Military Review

Grushko: NATO imposes a "confrontational agenda" on us

44
Moscow will take into account the approach of NATO to the Russian borders in its military planning, leads Look words of the permanent representative at the alliance of Alexander Grushko.




In 2004, the Baltic was the most tranquil region of Europe.

“At that time, the Baltic States was militarily the most peaceful region in Europe. Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia de facto did not have armed forces, and NATO did not have the potentials on the territory of these countries, which allowed us (Russia) to reduce our military presence, ”said Grushko.

According to him, “the alliance’s decision in 2004 to establish air patrols over the Baltic Sea was the first step towards major security changes.”

“Now the general alarming picture is complemented by the permanent military exercises of the Alliance countries in Europe, the rotation of American troops, the redeployment of heavy military equipment to the locations of warehouses and the transfer of rapid deployment equipment from two to five brigades,” the permanent representative noted.

“This is certainly the biggest shift in the security and deployment models (units) of NATO. We will seriously pay attention to this in the process of further military planning, ”he said.

“Russia is not moving anywhere. But NATO as a result of its expansion is approaching Russia. It (the organization) uses the territory to project military power in the direction of Russia, ”the diplomat stated.

“NATO is trying to impose a confrontational agenda on us, which we believe is in the past,” he said. “Our vision of European security allows all countries to be involved in a joint search for approaches to new security challenges.”

The Permanent Representative described as speculations "allegations about the development of the use of nuclear weapons by the example of Sweden, which is not a nuclear power."

"All these stories about the so-called imitations of nuclear attacks on other states do not correspond to reality, ”he added.

But Russia to the alliance "has well-founded claims in connection with the practice of the so-called NATO joint nuclear missions (nuclear sharing), which in itself contradicts the spirit and letter of the NPT."

“Now, as we see, the main focus (of NATO) is on how to contain Russia. Not only politically, but also by military means. Such a mix of military planning and politics is a dangerous tendency, the permanent representative noted. - This is not our choice. We firmly believe that we must continue along the path of creating a new Europe. ”

“NATO is moving in the direction of ensuring security in accordance with the old scheme, instead of looking for ways to expand interaction with Russia on a number of issues affecting security,” Grushko said.

Touching upon the topic of the American concept of global strike, the diplomat noted that this is a very dangerous idea from the point of view of stability in the world.

“This is a very dangerous thing in terms of strategic stability. It is necessary to study the question of the militarization of space. We are trying to convince our partners to seriously participate in the negotiations on the refusal to deploy military assets in space, ”he said.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. with
    with 15 February 2016 14: 15
    13
    [i] “Now, as we see, the main focus (of NATO) is on how to contain Russia. Not only politically, but also by military means. Such a mix of military planning and politics is a dangerous trend, the permanent representative noted. “This is not our choice.” We firmly believe that we must continue along the path of creating a new Europe. ”
    Now NATO has neither the mind nor the money to disguise its "peaceful" plans.
    1. Michael67
      Michael67 15 February 2016 14: 17
      +8
      Here it is to God - not people. How much will they drink blood?
      1. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 15 February 2016 14: 26
        +6
        Pralna, also sue Nata for using the mentally damaging, inconspicuous midgets of the Baltic states for mercenary purposes! am
      2. chikenous59
        chikenous59 15 February 2016 14: 34
        +9
        Quote: Michael67
        Here it is to God - not people. How much will they drink blood?

        What do you want? People have always fought and will fight. For oil, for territory, for money, for food, for anything!
        We are not in paradise. Everyone has their own interests. We have different interests with the West, and therefore we are in conflict. They will not listen to us, we will not listen to them, because we are competitors for each other "in a common kitchen" - there will not be enough resources for everyone, so the strongest will survive.
        Do not wait for someone to be honest with us. Everyone has their own motives.
        But we insist on observance of international law only because we have not restored our economy, it is too early for us to rush into the battle.
        So we are wasting time with all sorts of negotiations, such as "Minsk", "Geneva", etc.
        Take off your pink glasses.

        Relations between the West and Russia are exactly the same as between predators in the forest. Everyone wants to grab a piece fatter, but he will get the strongest. The weak suffers or dies.
        Man by nature is also "animal". In our country, people are constantly killing, robbing, and raping each other.
        It’s the same here, but between states.

        So while the "hurray-patriots" are letting off steam and throwing their caps at the United States in the comments, smart and necessary people are doing everything to grab this "fat piece" from competitors, while doing without war (praise the diplomats).
        1. cap
          cap 15 February 2016 15: 09
          +4
          Quote: chikenous59
          So while the "hurray-patriots" are letting off steam and throwing their caps at the United States in the comments, smart and necessary people are doing everything to grab this "fat piece" from competitors, while doing without war (praise the diplomats).


          I must admit that you are right. Apart from the caps, the patriots have nothing but a VO site where you can let off steam and throw a hat at an adversary of the state interests of Russia. I support the praise given to diplomats. However, you shouldn’t use derogatory speech to many compatriots. the audience, in addition to hats and slippers by the couch, has ascribed testimonies of military commissariats from Sakhalin to Kaliningrad. And the words of diplomats are words that are not Kalashnikov’s assault rifles in the hands of a real defender of the Motherland.
          That's something like this. I put you a plus, given the future potential. I hope to continue to see you in our well-organized ranks. hi
        2. Shark Lover
          Shark Lover 15 February 2016 15: 21
          +1
          If we descend from global thoughts and consider a more approximate example, then the picture is as follows. There was a small, frequent shop, did not bother anyone, sold at a good price, it was profitable for everyone, the entrepreneur, the customers. Taxes were paid, rent wages to employees, etc. At this time, a group of people with large resources decided to open a chain store in this quarter, to capture the market share that the store was successfully hilling. They paid, bribed, invested, blasted advertising through the media, built, opened. The little shop is dead. From the group of people, no one even bothered about the fate of an entrepreneur, the desire of clients, on the contrary, nothing personal, only business. And so in many industries, areas in our "market life". The same do the immigrants with countries, they deeply do not care about morals and ethical standards. If it is necessary to erase half of the continent for profit, yes, for God's sake, preferably by someone else's hands, saving your resources. And nobody cares about what will happen to the residents, as the redhead said, “they did not fit into our plans.” It will always be like this, the strong (not physically, but resourcefully) will devour the weak. There is only one way out, to be strong. And in this struggle there will be no 45-year, Victory, it will always be. Even if you hit on these Indian haters, the wrong ones will die, ordinary, stupid residents will die, the instigators and initiators of all this will sit out and again count the profit. By the way, the main instigators are all with the same surnames), far from American.
      3. Agent_017
        Agent_017 15 February 2016 15: 08
        +2
        Vampires cannot eat carrots ... Only a silver bullet or an aspen stake .. It’s better to score in a soft place .. We subconsciously divide the whole world into good and bad. And they also have - Nothing personal, just business! So after all, on military orders and deployment, some earn a lot of money, this is just the case .. Greed knows no bounds, and therefore only amputation ...
      4. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 15 February 2016 19: 12
        0
        Here it’s not necessary to be a Wang - until they rake a bit or in full. Up to this point, 100% will climb.
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 15 February 2016 14: 21
      10
      They not only have no mind, no money, but no literate specialists who worked against the USSR long ago left, there are stupid young people who need a quick career and a full pocket of money.
    3. Baikonur
      Baikonur 15 February 2016 14: 21
      +3
      Quote: Grushko
      focus (NATO) on how to contain Russia.
      We are trying to convince our partners to seriously participate in negotiations on the refusal to deploy military assets in space
      Yeah! SHCHAZ! all abandoned and refused! My slippers even laugh! laughing
      1. 2С5
        2С5 15 February 2016 14: 56
        +1
        ... ya vapsche patstalom laughing
    4. Tor5
      Tor5 15 February 2016 14: 24
      +3
      Eh, Daesh, Daesh, they would have taken and distracted the bastards with a real problem, and not far-fetched ones.
      1. yuriy55
        yuriy55 15 February 2016 14: 38
        +1
        “Russia is not moving anywhere. But NATO, as a result of its expansion, is approaching Russia. She (the organization) uses the territory to project military power in the direction of Russia, ”the diplomat said.


        "Therefore, those who are closest to Russia will be the first to receive their portion of" lyuly ", - S.K.Shoigu had to state ...
        soldier
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Flinky
      Flinky 15 February 2016 14: 37
      +1
      Money will print. But there is definitely no mind, but this is not the main thing. No time. Therefore, such a wave began.
      1. marna
        marna 15 February 2016 14: 51
        +1
        NATO was created in 1949 to repel the "Soviet threat". There is no USSR, it would seem there is no threat. But there is the United States, whose share in NATO spending is about 70%. So Europe is nightmare to justify itself in front of a senior partner that it is not in vain that he invests money.
    7. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 15 February 2016 14: 51
      +3
      Deployment of NATO troops, headquarters and arsenals in Eastern Europe? Yes, please, Iskander, Caliber and other things with a wide range of warheads will be enough for all of them.
      The population of the Baltic states, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and other countries just thinks about the fact that their politicians, n.e.d.o.m.c.s, are turning their own territories into a target field for Russian missiles ?
    8. 2С5
      2С5 15 February 2016 14: 53
      +2
      ... their "smart" is not intended for the prompt solution of problems ... a plus, or maybe a minus, is that when solving foreign policy issues in the State Department and the Pentagon, thanks to the upcoming elections, each "sect" pulls a blanket over itself and to they cannot come to a "consensus" ... well, and probably the most important thing is that they do not take into account the Yankees of the current moment and act according to old worn out and read-out scenarios in which perhaps they did not wrap the fish ... and this country imagines itself as a world leader in everything (including external debt lol )! All their arrogance is only enough for cheap throwing poop in our direction and zombifying XoXLs. They apparently believe that if the USSR succeeded in destroying the USSR, it means that we will ditch Russia according to the same scenario ... but "oh, you guessed it there! Our people remember the" charms "of hump-yelts-capitalism and in the second round they will hardly agree to such an attraction .. ...
  2. A-Sim
    A-Sim 15 February 2016 14: 16
    +3
    Words cannot achieve anything with them. Unfortunately, their understanding starts from the moment they feel hurt. And the greater the damage, the faster understanding and negotiability comes.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. bronik
    bronik 15 February 2016 14: 23
    +8
    If you look at the world map of the 80s and compare with today, it turns out that NATO has invaded the territory of the USSR long ago. It’s better not to talk about the Warsaw Treaty. It hurts!
  5. DMB_95
    DMB_95 15 February 2016 14: 23
    +5
    According to the official point of view, the United States put Russia in 1st place (China-on 2nd, igil-on 5th) among its enemies. Maybe it's time to become what we have been considered for a long time?
    1. 2С5
      2С5 15 February 2016 15: 00
      +1
      ... and what, like, have not yet !? What Kaashmarr! It is probably necessary to conduct a poll in the "member countries" on the topic: Whom do you (we) consider to be a threat to world democracy No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3? Shl lol .
  6. EvgNik
    EvgNik 15 February 2016 14: 24
    +1
    Russia is not moving anywhere. But NATO, as a result of its expansion, is approaching Russia.

    If NATO wants to commit suicide, this is NATO’s problem. Could simply explode their charges on their territory. And to draw the whole world into a suicidal war ... Or are they thinking of sitting out overseas? Will not work. The first missiles from our side will fly right there.
  7. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 15 February 2016 14: 27
    +3
    Baltic wrestlers follow Russia laughing
    1. gg.na
      gg.na 15 February 2016 16: 09
      +1
      Quote: Gormengast
      wrestlers

      wrestlers laughing yy- lol yyyyy wassat -y- bully ss ha ha ha ha !!! Well, you came up with the name good !!! BORTSUNYYYYYY !!!!! ha ha ha hahaaaaa wassat laughing lol good Definitely ++++++++++ !!!!!!!!
  8. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 15 February 2016 14: 30
    +4
    The desire of homoNATO is quite understandable. laughing
    1. 4ekist
      4ekist 15 February 2016 14: 45
      +2
      Some kind of humanoid.
      1. gg.na
        gg.na 15 February 2016 16: 11
        +2
        Quote: 4ekist
        Humanoid

        More likely a homonoid! wink
  9. An64
    An64 15 February 2016 14: 30
    +1
    Russia is not moving anywhere. But NATO, as a result of its expansion, is approaching Russia

    To be honest, Russia has nowhere to move. In the West, we don’t have allies who could form a military alliance with us (I’m not talking about Belarus - it is a member of the CSTO).
    I do not really understand the functions of the permanent mission of the Russian Federation to NATO. We do not consider them friends-allies, moreover, "NATO is trying to impose a confrontational agenda on us," and we maintain our apparatus at their headquarters. What for? To persuade those who do not hear us and do not want to hear?
    1. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 15 February 2016 16: 46
      0
      Quote: An64
      I do not really understand the functions of the Russian permanent mission to NATO. We do not consider them friends-allies, moreover, "NATO is trying to impose a confrontational agenda on us," and we maintain our apparatus at their headquarters. What for?


      I would like to say the same about our representations in the EU, OSCE, etc., etc. We pay some, and considerable, funds for their maintenance. What for?
  10. Tusv
    Tusv 15 February 2016 14: 33
    0
    Quote: DMB_95
    According to the official point of view, the United States put Russia in 1st place (China-2nd, igil-5th) among its enemies. Maybe it's time to become what

    What enemies do we have?
    1) States 2) Liberoids. Rest of the variation
  11. mr.grin19z
    mr.grin19z 15 February 2016 14: 36
    +1
    no brainer that we have no allies in the west and the fact that they are trying to impose all the bullshit they themselves only create problems
  12. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 15 February 2016 14: 38
    0
    In the West, for a long time, as is evident from practice, leaders of both blocs and EU countries have been elected not by their education and work experience, but simply by completely agreeing to any actions indicated above. and we hear at all levels all nonsense from the West and the type of solidarity, although it's all just Big Top!
  13. Michael67
    Michael67 15 February 2016 14: 44
    +1
    Quote: chikenous59
    Quote: Michael67
    Here it is to God - not people. How much will they drink blood?

    What do you want? People have always fought and will fight. For oil, for territory, for money, for food, for anything!
    We are not in paradise. Everyone has their own interests. We have different interests with the West, and therefore we are in conflict. They will not listen to us, we will not listen to them, because we are competitors for each other "in a common kitchen" - there will not be enough resources for everyone, so the strongest will survive.
    Do not wait for someone to be honest with us. Everyone has their own motives.
    But we insist on observance of international law only because we have not restored our economy, it is too early for us to rush into the battle.
    So we are wasting time with all sorts of negotiations, such as "Minsk", "Geneva", etc.
    Take off your pink glasses.

    Relations between the West and Russia are exactly the same as between predators in the forest. Everyone wants to grab a piece fatter, but he will get the strongest. The weak suffers or dies.
    Man by nature is also "animal". In our country, people are constantly killing, robbing, and raping each other.
    It’s the same here, but between states.

    So while the "hurray-patriots" are letting off steam and throwing their caps at the United States in the comments, smart and necessary people are doing everything to grab this "fat piece" from competitors, while doing without war (praise the diplomats).

    Russia has never "snatched" anything from anyone. It only provided justice. And this is a historical fact.
    1. chikenous59
      chikenous59 15 February 2016 14: 50
      -12 qualifying.
      Quote: Michael67
      Russia has never "snatched" anything from anyone

      I hesitate to ask, and about 500-600 years ago our territory was just as huge?
      What about the achievements of Ivan the Terrible, Ermak, etc.?)) Do not tell me. Remember from history how Siberia and the Caucasus were conquered, how much blood was shed!
      We fought no less than others and took territories, just at some point there was no time for wars of conquest, because the country's territories were gigantic and it was necessary to somehow manage it. Apparently this is not so simple.
      The USA is a young state and behaves in exactly the same way as our state many centuries ago.
      There is nothing to be surprised at!
      They want to control oil flows in Syria and we want, here you have the conflict of 2 predators, each of which is not going to give in!
      You can throw me minuses, caps, but you do not need to turn the story upside down! We always fought and seized territories.
      1. MSL
        MSL 15 February 2016 15: 31
        +3
        Quote: chikenous59
        They want to control oil flows in Syria and we want, here you have the conflict of 2 predators, each of which is not going to give in!


        We? Control oil flows in Syria? God forbid, we can cope with our own, which, incidentally, the Anglo-Saxons have their own views.

        As a historian, I’m interested in: what nations disappeared from the face of the earth when Russia conquered Siberia, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Alaska, California?
      2. serezhasoldatow
        serezhasoldatow 15 February 2016 15: 46
        +1
        These were not predatory wars. It was mastering and joining. The Russians did not impose their religion and lifestyle on anyone. The annexed territories and peoples were, are and will be under the protection of the Russians. Something like that.
      3. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 15 February 2016 16: 13
        +1
        This is where did you learn history? And besides Ivan the Terrible and Ermak, is there anything else?
        1. chikenous59
          chikenous59 15 February 2016 17: 03
          -3
          Quote: Observer 33
          This is where did you learn history? And besides Ivan the Terrible and Ermak, is there anything else?

          Of course there is, take a look at the textbook. Only not something, but someone.
          1. Volzhanin
            Volzhanin 15 February 2016 19: 22
            +1
            :) Are you seriously? In which - in Khokhlyatsky? In Polish, in spratostan?

            So we also conquered the sex of the geyrops, but where are the conquests?
            Facts to the studio!
      4. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 15 February 2016 19: 18
        0
        The facts basically say the opposite, but I feel you do it anyway. :))
  14. valent45
    valent45 15 February 2016 14: 47
    +2
    NATO is not only imposing its confrontation on us, it is pumping money out of member countries.
    And the member countries (Poland, the Baltic states) are catching on the horrors of the Russian threat to extort money from
    patron countries.
  15. shelva
    shelva 15 February 2016 14: 59
    0
    These Baltic dwarf states surprise - poured pugs from Krylov's fable, even ammunition pity them.
    1. Oleg1080
      Oleg1080 15 February 2016 15: 09
      +1
      Throw them with stones and sticks, dope must be knocked out of my head.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. 2С5
    2С5 15 February 2016 15: 05
    0
    Putin to Obama: Barik, if there was a world competition of m "Dacians, you would certainly take second place ...

    BO: Why?

    VVP: Yes, because you are duck
  17. square
    square 15 February 2016 15: 11
    +1
    Grushko: NATO imposes a “confrontational agenda” on us /
    And since its inception.
  18. afrikanez
    afrikanez 15 February 2016 16: 54
    0
    To the Americans, that on the forehead, that on the forehead, one horseradish will stand on its own, rams. It seems that they consider Europe their territory, if they are so worried about its security! belay
  19. anfil
    anfil 15 February 2016 16: 58
    +2
    Quote: Michael67
    Here it is to God - not people. How much will they drink blood?