Moscow stalls as a new "icon" of Russian liberals. The demolition echo ...
Someone sat down at the calculator and began to consider how many Moscow-based innovative businessmen, after working with excavators and bulldozers, will receive less of the freshest shawarma every day, and therefore - revenues, and also, therefore - how much tax the Moscow city budget will lose. Aha - taxes ... And the calculators led these people to the fact that it was the shawarma that for many years was the engine of progress in the Russian capital, and the stalls for its production were literally city-forming enterprises. There are no “shaurmyachechny” and “lyulyakababny” - no, you know, and Moscow itself ...
And when in one of the discussions a phrase like “Moscow is not the same” appears, uttered with all seriousness, it becomes once again extremely clear what our dear “friends” from the liberal panopticon see modern Russia. In the next program of Konstantin Semin "Agitprop", released recently on the TV channel "Russia 24", a remarkable characteristic was given to that liberal stomping with feet and sprinkling of saliva, which suddenly, like a wave of a magic wand, manifested itself against the background of the decision of the city authorities. As Konstantin says, why do ladies and gentlemen who are now raising a wave about the demolition of an illegal samostroit in central Moscow, and stating that this is a blow to Russian business, were silent in a rag when in Moscow at one time they stopped and looted entire factories. Why did they not raise their “popular wave” when the production lines were privatized for nothing, then they gave up on the ferrous metal with simultaneous dismissal of hundreds of employees of factories and plants and the start of construction of the next points for the sale of alcohol or Chinese-Turkish consumer goods.
Hundreds of Moscow industrial enterprises were destroyed with a light stroke of the pen in 90 — against the background of “saving privatization”, and indeed, about the same, Privatizers continue to be engaged now. The logic is as follows: why open a new textile factory, if you can buy bales of low-quality products somewhere in Asia, why invest in something that will bring financial returns no earlier than 2-3 years, if grandmas are needed here and now? ..
At the same time, the phrase “deductions to the budget” of such businessmen and their ideological advocates from among the “non-survivors” causes, at best, a slight grin, and more often loud laughter - they say, deductions to somewhere? .. The excuses are as follows: in Moscow You know, the economic sense of expanding production in industrial (well, which used to be such) areas of the capital is very expensive to rent land, it’s better to set up “shawry-ball” and wine-glasses in the central streets and squares, tangle with stolen mobile phones and the Moscow railway stations are so economically more appropriate ... And if there is a stall in which Jumshut (with the permission of Rajab and their common "roof" with stars on shoulder straps from some "re-certified" police station) , they decided to demolish the Moscow authorities, that, you know, a blow to the Russian economy ...
None of the samostroyas who were concerned about the demolition, including Mr. Navalny, who mourned the "small business", did not say a word about whether this is a step in the work on the fight against corruption. After all, it is not a secret to anyone that the financial return from the samostroi in the center of Moscow could go to anyone, including the mentioned “roof”, but not to the capital budget. On stalls, snack bars, eateries, built on the basis of officials committing corruption crimes, earned precisely those against whom, by definition, all sorts of anti-corruption funds, including the fund of the notorious Navalny, should fight. But, here's a bad luck, Mr. Navalny, as a fierce anti-corruption fighter, now acts as one of the fighters against the demolition of an unlawful samostroya, braiding something absurd in the style: “Are businessmen really to blame? .. They took loans, built , rented, worked ... "Well, of course, the businessman who delivered the flashed mobiles in the station stall or roasted chebureks on triple expired oil from the meat that was running around the station yesterday (by a guest who does not have an elementary booklet from the sunny Central Asian Republic) not mind Om, that his stall is on the municipal land, and the "tax" he pays in the envelope to the "good uncle" from the police station located nearby ...
Photo of the "shopping center", known to most locals actually open trade in narcotic substances (from Oleg Lurie's blog):
And for some reason, none of the “non-living” reports in their blogs that, along with the demolition of illegal samostroevs, a wave swept across Moscow, as the president of the brotherly state tells us, the “overhaul” of the personnel of the Moscow supervisory bodies and relevant committees in the municipalities . And why talk about this? After all, for a liberal “intelligentsia”, not the truth is important, but the wave is important, which needs to be raised so that ordinary citizens discuss it in the right way for them (“non-living”). The wave is raised, but only in this case, this wave perfectly demonstrates the whole essence of the persons raising it. And these persons have the same essence: to try to protect the property acquired with honest (hard work) with thin handlers with thin hands. To defend, for rampant and actual anarchy of 90-s in Russia is for the sake of the return of which the "non-living" three times a day feed on the cookies of the well-known "confectioners".
- Alexei Volodin
- http://macos.livejournal.com/, http://kungurov.livejournal.com
Information