Military Review

Damascus demanded that the UN "put an end" to the crimes of Ankara in Syria

60
In Damascus, they condemned Turkey’s actions against the SAR and demanded that the UN "put an end" to the crimes of the Turkish troops that continue to fire at settlements in the province of Aleppo, reports RIA News.




“The city of Deir-Jamal in the north of the province of Aleppo has undergone regular shelling of Turkish guns,” a Syrian source told the news agency.

Prime Minister Davutoglu explained Turkey’s actions by responding to it in accordance with the “rules of engagement”. He demanded the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PDS) to leave the position north of Allepo. The head of the PDS, Salih Muslim, refused. According to him, "if the invasion occurs, the entire Syrian people will resist them (the Turks)."

The ATS government, in response to the actions of Ankara, sent a letter to the UN Secretary General, condemning the "attacks from Turkey" and called on the Organization "to fulfill its obligations and put an end to the crimes of the Turkish regime."

On Sunday, a statement was received from the US Department of State: "We are concerned about the situation north of Aleppo and are working to reduce tension on all sides."

In turn, Vice President Joe Biden called on Ankara to cease fire on Syrian territory.

“The vice president noted that the United States is making efforts to convince the Syrian Kurdish forces not to use the current circumstances in order to seize additional territory near the Turkish border. He also called on Turkey to demonstrate mutual restraint by stopping artillery strikes in the area, ”the White House release said.

It is noted that "the vice-president stressed support for the Turkish struggle against terrorism of the Kurdish Workers' Party, the leaders stressed that their common goal is to defeat the IS and to work on the cessation of hostilities, as agreed in Munich."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. nemec55
    nemec55 15 February 2016 09: 55
    0
    Why is there no answer ?? Why do not cover the place of shelling ??
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 15 February 2016 09: 57
      39
      Quote: nemec55
      Why is there no answer ?? Why do not cover the place of shelling ??

      Than? Hats of Russian patriots? Indeed, it is time to build a header pipeline from the Voennoye Obozreniye site to Syria ...
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 15 February 2016 10: 00
        19
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Damascus demanded that the UN "put an end" to the crimes of Ankara in Syria

        And what kind of reaction does Damascus expect from the UN?

        Yes, there will be no reaction, well, unless the next concern expresses
        1. cniza
          cniza 15 February 2016 10: 02
          11
          The reaction can only be from Russia.
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 15 February 2016 10: 07
            +7
            Quote: cniza
            The reaction can only be from Russia.
            And the UN - Put the BOLT!
            Damascus demanded that the UN "put an end"
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 15 February 2016 10: 41
              16
              Damascus’s statement to the UN regarding Turkey on the information and diplomatic front was necessary and tactically absolutely correct. The war is going on at two levels - 1) armed and 2) diplomatic and informational.
              Damascus and Russia should not lose the information and diplomatic war to Turkey and its patrons. A gain at the information and diplomatic level can prevent an armed exacerbation in the war itself. These are the psychological laws of armed confrontation between the opposing sides. You cannot leave the "black mark" for yourself - it must be shifted to the enemy.
          2. asadov
            asadov 15 February 2016 10: 10
            0
            and only if the Turks and others like them cross or cross the border.
            1. Zeppelin ml.
              Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 19
              0
              Quote: asadov
              and only if the Turks and others like them cross or cross the border.

              and that will be? Will Damascus declare war on Turkey? And then?
              1. Sid.74
                Sid.74 15 February 2016 10: 55
                +7
                Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                and that will be?
                I think that they will shoot down the aircraft of Turkey. The president instructed the RF Ministry of Defense to shoot down any object threatening our aircraft. All in all, the C-400 was carrying Syria for good reason.
              2. shuhartred
                shuhartred 15 February 2016 14: 02
                0
                Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                and that will be? Will Damascus declare war on Turkey? And then?

                What's next? Syria war with Turkey. Were there few of them in history? Over there, some one hundred years with each other sausage.
        2. kapitan92
          kapitan92 15 February 2016 10: 11
          +9
          Quote: vovanpain
          Yes, there will be no reaction, well, unless the next concern expresses

          I agree with you! The UN is a purely deliberative and advisory body, but an unscheduled meeting of the Security Council can be initiated.
          Probably the goal is to attract public opinion and the media.
        3. The black
          The black 15 February 2016 10: 12
          +8
          Yes, there will be no reaction, well, unless the next concern expresses
          Will not be. Nevertheless, it is necessary to declare. In general, the Syrians should, on every occasion and at all levels, declare about the impending invasion and shelling of their territory, so that then the UN Secretary General would not expand his eyes in surprise and he would not say that he knew nothing of this.
        4. Sid.74
          Sid.74 15 February 2016 10: 43
          +1
          Quote: vovanpain
          Yes, there will be no reaction, well, unless the next concern expresses

          How is it? Even the Americans got worried ... the fact is that besides the Kurds, there are no allies in Syria, even temporary ones.

          US Vice President Joe Biden urged Turkish Prime Minister to stop strikes in northern Syria

          US Vice President Joe Biden, in a telephone conversation with Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, called on Ankara to demonstrate mutual restraint by stopping artillery strikes in the north of Syria.http: //ria.ru/syria/20160214/1374398127.html

          Although America officially does not support the Kurdish Workers Party, it supports Kurdish troops in Syria. And the Turks beat them out of artillery.
        5. Old
          Old 15 February 2016 10: 43
          +2
          It is necessary to create a coalition against the Turks. Invite the Kurds, Iran, Iraq, Armenians, Georgians, Greeks, Bulgarians ... To hold the first working meeting in Damascus.
      2. Thrall
        Thrall 15 February 2016 10: 03
        21
        Hmm, over the border (Syrian-Turkish) clouds go gloomy.
        1. revnagan
          revnagan 15 February 2016 11: 05
          +2
          Phe, we have such rats, the whole Verkhovna Zrada. And still on Bankova - kublo.
      3. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 17
        -10 qualifying.
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Hats of Russian patriots? Indeed, it is high time to build a header pipeline from the Voennoye Obozreniye website to Syria ..

        laughing well unscrewed)
      4. rpek32
        rpek32 15 February 2016 10: 30
        +3
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Caps of Russian patriots?

        Syria has artillery, so the question "with what" is incorrect
        1. revnagan
          revnagan 15 February 2016 11: 41
          0
          Quote: rpek32
          Syria has artillery.

          And the Turks have it. And who has more? Until Assad does not get rid of Daesh, his hands are tied.
          1. Cheshire
            Cheshire 15 February 2016 12: 16
            0
            Until Assad does away with Daesh, his hands are tied.

            And since daish enjoys the support of Turkey, you won’t be able to deal with him without having finished with the Turks.
            hi
            1. Misha Honest
              Misha Honest 15 February 2016 13: 37
              0
              Quote: revnagan
              And the Turks have it. And who has more? Until Assad does not get rid of Daesh, his hands are tied.

              Quote: Cheshire
              And since daish enjoys the support of Turkey, you won’t be able to deal with him without having finished with the Turks.

              Vicious circle. Although, personally the first statement seems more fair to me. To start a war also with the Turks for Syria is tantamount to suicide. A war on two fronts has never ended in any good state. Although no, it will already be a war on three fronts, if we count the Syrian Free Army ...
          2. rpek32
            rpek32 15 February 2016 12: 39
            0
            Quote: revnagan
            And the Turks have it. And who has more? Until Assad does not get rid of Daesh, his hands are tied.

            the question was not "who will shoot whom more with artillery" but "how to respond to shelling with turkey"
      5. Svetlana
        Svetlana 15 February 2016 11: 12
        +3
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Hats of Russian patriots? Indeed, it is time to build a header pipeline from the Voennoye Obozreniye site to Syria ...

        It is not advisable to respond to all provocations of the enemy and not in all cases. Sometimes this is appropriate and important. And sometimes it's just stupid. I really hope that not fools and cowards are sitting in our Ministry of Defense, but adequate educated people who have studied the entire experience of waging wars by their predecessors both in the East and in the West. Events in Syria in recent months confirm this, at least. If only the liberals in our government do not start to put a spoke in the wheels of the military machine, then we will be able to deal with ISIS and the Turks. There is a good Russian proverb: "The devil is not so terrible as he is painted."
        Underestimating the strength of the enemy is criminal and destructive, but, in my opinion, someone also underestimates our forces to their doom. If sensible people remain in the Turkish leadership, they will not allow Erdogan to put his country under attack. If not, then all the worse for them. We can defeat an enemy superior in strength, and this has been shown to the world more than once or twice. If the Turks are hoping for NATO’s help, then let them remember the history of the 2 World War II and estimate, at what point does the West usually come to the aid of the Allies? At first they will look, without getting involved in a fight, who will start to win, and after that they will already begin to help. But no matter how late and pointless.
      6. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 15 February 2016 11: 25
        0
        Our UN Security Council needs to be assembled. Here is what you need. And while they do not accept our resolution, do not dissolve, let them sit for a week ... There, and prescribe measures of influence. And either the UN will finally work, or I don’t know ...
        1. atalef
          atalef 15 February 2016 11: 32
          -2
          Quote: Observer 33
          Our UN Security Council needs to be assembled. Here is what you need. And while they do not accept our resolution, do not dissolve, let them sit for a week ... There, and prescribe measures of influence.

          Is that a conclave in the Vatican? Until white smoke starts? And will you entrust the security of the Owls Hall to the sailor Zheleznyak?
          1. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher 15 February 2016 11: 41
            +2
            And why ernichat something, I did not understand? And why me? Am I a special envoy to the UN? This is the only way out. There is, of course, one more, but I'm afraid you will not like it.
            1. Cheshire
              Cheshire 15 February 2016 12: 19
              +1
              Remind me, please, when did the UN really decide something?
              1. 33 Watcher
                33 Watcher 15 February 2016 13: 02
                0
                Years to 1965 ...
      7. SPACE
        SPACE 15 February 2016 11: 33
        +3
        Quote: nemec55
        Why is there no answer ?? Why do not cover the place of shelling ??

        And what, something extraordinary has already happened? ))) I can’t wait for people, I wanted to war, I don’t need panic, better fasten your seat belts, passengers e, take care of nerve cells.
        Only cats are born quickly, everything will be, everything has its time ... the fish has not yet swallowed the bait, and maybe it will not be able ...;)
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Caps of Russian patriots?

        The patriots even have hats, you don’t have anything left for the darling, you all have long been prosralipolymers, so relax and watch from the side, this is not your story.
        Z.Y. Now the polymer workers will go out of hibernation and become more active))), they have another opportunity to throw themselves around with all kinds of garbage, and probably it’s not worth it to interfere, for which time they themselves will come to naught))).
      8. lelikas
        lelikas 15 February 2016 11: 36
        +1
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Hats of Russian patriots? Indeed, it is time to build a header pipeline from the Voennoye Obozreniye site to Syria ...

        It will be too much! Well, the hats, they are at least soft - and from Mikhan the helmets will fly - they are iron ...
        It’s just that the Kurds should, by chance, find howitzers in the steppe and boxes with shells and shooting tables.
      9. Suhov
        Suhov 15 February 2016 13: 09
        +2
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Hats of Russian patriots? Indeed, it is time to build a header pipeline from the Voennoye Obozreniye site to Syria ...


        If you are criticizing, and in this form, then propose a solution to this problem yourself.
        How to stop shelling of Syrian territory, the Syrian military, as well as civilians from the Turkish side. What need to do?
        It seemed that you know this decision, but somehow tear it down. smile
        This question, by the way, is of interest to many.
        There are several obvious solutions, but what the consequences will be - this must be considered. The necessary data for this for most, but not for everyone for well-known reasons - not available.
        Sound your solution to the problem, sir? smile
        hi
      10. shuhartred
        shuhartred 15 February 2016 13: 59
        0
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Than? Caps of Russian patriots?

        And what the Syrians have nothing to answer? belay And where does the cap and hatched conduit? You dear, say what you think, but think what you say! If you do not delve into the previous comment nefig knock on the clave.
        PS By the way, there was infa today that the otvetka did fly. Only I don’t remember where I saw it !?
    2. vyinemeynen
      vyinemeynen 15 February 2016 10: 04
      +3
      Turkey's suicide about Russia continues!
      Quote: nemec55
      Why is there no answer ?? Why do not cover the place of shelling ??

      does the absence of a picture on the "reply" on TV indicate the absence of the fact of "reply"
    3. PKK
      PKK 15 February 2016 10: 06
      +4
      There was an answer the day before yesterday with one battery.
      1. Vita vko
        Vita vko 15 February 2016 10: 14
        +4
        It's time to deliver the Zoo systems to the Syrians. The Ottomans are used to doing everything with impunity, but when they get it in the teeth, they immediately calm down.
        1. Zeppelin ml.
          Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 21
          0
          Quote: Vita VKO
          It's time to deliver

          again "suppliers" got worried laughing In each article "it's time to supply ..." - Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, North Korea (hereinafter everywhere).
          1. vlad66
            vlad66 15 February 2016 10: 27
            12
            Quote: Zeppelin ml.
            Quote: Vita VKO
            It's time to deliver

            again "suppliers" got worried laughing In each article "it's time to supply ..." - Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, North Korea (hereinafter everywhere).

            It will be necessary to put it this way, they won’t ask us hi
            1. Zeppelin ml.
              Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 39
              +2
              Quote: vlad66
              It will be necessary to put it this way, they won’t ask us

              unconditionally)
              The firm belief of some is simply amusing: "We put the wunderwaffe - victory is assured."
          2. drilled
            drilled 15 February 2016 10: 28
            +4
            And what needs to be done, comrade. Zippelin, tell me. And then we will not put our mind in any way.
            1. Zeppelin ml.
              Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 33
              -6
              Quote: Burieway
              And what needs to be done, comrade. Zippelin, tell me. And then we will not put our mind in any way.

              yes easy - record a video message to Ban Ki-moon, like studiosus recently. Gather a bunch of likes on VO.
              1. MACCABI-TLV
                MACCABI-TLV 15 February 2016 10: 58
                0
                Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                Ban Ki-moon

                the kid is not sane, the next option please.
                1. Zeppelin ml.
                  Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 11: 53
                  +1
                  Quote: MACCABI-TLV
                  Quote: Zeppelin ml.
                  Ban Ki-moon

                  the kid is not sane, the next option please.

                  rightly so. There are no candidates (
                  Shoigu? laughing
              2. Tu-214R
                Tu-214R 15 February 2016 11: 10
                +1
                yes easy - record a video message to Ban Ki-moon, like studiosus recently. Gather a bunch of likes on VO.

                I can't decide whose circus is better / cooler. Or Top Var with local balabolic clowns like zeppelin and other Giants of thought. Or Courage, with the local kings who cannot decide among themselves what to consider offtopic in the subject and ban everyone in a row (Cartographer "release to freedom"!)
                1. Zeppelin ml.
                  Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 11: 36
                  -1
                  Quote: Tu-214P
                  Or Top Var with local clown-balabol type zeppelin and

                  finally there was a neclown and nebalabol !! Come on, "coves like spaceships ply the Bolshoi Theater .." (c) About the supply of sunshine has already been. What else to put there?
          3. Vita vko
            Vita vko 15 February 2016 10: 29
            -3
            And why should they rot on the NZ when they can be tested in combat conditions. Moreover, ammunition is not needed. And after the destruction of several batteries, the Turks will be careful not to shoot towards the Syrian border. Or do you think that these systems can be applied in the European part of Russia against the banned "right sector"? I doubt it very much.
    4. Blondy
      Blondy 15 February 2016 12: 15
      +1
      Quote: nemec55
      Why is there no answer ?? Why do not cover the place of shelling ??

      They answered, but one does not interfere with the other.
      I quote again: the Syrian army opened fire on artillery points on the territory of Turkey, from which military positions were fired in the north of Latakia province. This was reported by LifeNews correspondent Arthur Kebekov. In total, several salvoes were made by the Damascus military.
  2. Mera joota
    Mera joota 15 February 2016 09: 55
    +3
    Damascus demanded that the UN "put an end" to the crimes of Ankara in Syria

    And what kind of reaction does Damascus expect from the UN?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 15 February 2016 10: 04
      0
      There will be only one answer - "Assad must leave"
      1. vyinemeynen
        vyinemeynen 15 February 2016 10: 15
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        There will be only one answer - "Assad must leave"

        I think this time the UN response will surprise you. Shall we wait? smile
      2. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 12: 40
        +1
        Quote: Vadim237
        There will be only one answer - "Assad must leave"

        so there is also a mantra about "Aerospace Forces must stop bombing."
    2. Coconut Tima
      Coconut Tima 15 February 2016 10: 14
      0
      Quote: Mera Joota
      And what kind of reaction does Damascus expect from the UN?

      Puzzled Concern
    3. Dimy4
      Dimy4 15 February 2016 10: 31
      0
      Checking the "lice" of the organization, which has become almost another state instrument of the United States.
    4. Revolver
      Revolver 15 February 2016 10: 39
      +2
      Quote: Mera Joota
      Damascus demanded that the UN "put an end"

      And Erdogan put an end to this. Just as if he had not been crushed by this end by chance. belay
      1. MACCABI-TLV
        MACCABI-TLV 15 February 2016 10: 51
        -1
        Quote: Nagan
        That's just as if he had not crushed this end by chance

        Who! At least voice the options.
    5. lelikas
      lelikas 15 February 2016 11: 39
      0
      Quote: Mera Joota
      And what kind of reaction does Damascus expect from the UN?

      Ban Ki-moon will choose Pikachu!
  3. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 15 February 2016 09: 56
    +5
    Ottomans run up to prevent hemorrhoids. All they dream about is the Ottoman Empire. History is not taught. With a high probability they can get the opposite effect.
    1. Old
      Old 15 February 2016 10: 35
      +1
      Bulgarians, Greeks, Armenians, Georgians, Kurds, Iraq, Iran, Russians ... Turks continue to make enemies among their neighbors ... And the amount will always turn into quality. In my opinion, not a bad coalition is knocking together ...
  4. izya top
    izya top 15 February 2016 10: 00
    +1
    by any, any resolution, the Yankees, Britons and paddles will covet
  5. Svetlana
    Svetlana 15 February 2016 10: 03
    +3
    [quote] It is noted that "the vice president emphasized Turkey’s fight against terrorism by the Kurdish Workers' Party, leaders emphasized that their common goal is to defeat the Islamic State and work to end the hostilities, as agreed in Munich." [quote]
    Did you understand what you said? Erdogan is fighting the Kurdish terrorists, the US supports him, but they have one goal - to stop hostilities, which will defeat the Islamic State. Well, nonsense! Where is the logic here? Because gladiolus!
  6. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 15 February 2016 10: 03
    +4
    But the situation is serious, the Turks pulled up troops and are ready to invade Syria, supposedly to fight the Kurdish opposition! And what are our actions?
  7. PKK
    PKK 15 February 2016 10: 05
    0
    Erdogan has something new: "the rules of the use of force", he can share with the Kurds and with the Syrians. Otherwise, he will receive a response not according to the rules. He will also be offended.
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. snifer
      snifer 15 February 2016 10: 12
      +2
      oh, and you have drooling and some kind of non-healthy foam came out recourse
    2. Check
      Check 15 February 2016 10: 13
      0
      It’s good that the authorities aren’t such a careless person like you. just to see the spectacle. all options are probably already considered. for me, so if Turkey begins the invasion, then ours will simply equip the Kurds with all necessary means. and maybe already.
    3. Achilles
      Achilles 15 February 2016 10: 19
      +1
      In the case of Turkish aggression, the 1980 law on peace and friendship with Syria will enter into force, according to which the Soviet Union (and its legal successor in the person of the Russian Federation) is obliged to provide any military assistance in the event of external aggression. I do not know how much this is true about the 1980 law and is valid whether he is, we are not the USSR but the Russian Federation, but still I think if the Turks cross the border and do not threaten the base of the Russian Federation, we will in any case either directly or indirectly help the regular troops bomb the Turkish invasion. For Russians, if anyone did not know the gut is not thin, but NATO, which is afraid of any victims, does not run into Turkey, let alone an aggressor country. Who has a small intestine at NATO. Putin is not a cop but a KGB
    4. Victor-M
      Victor-M 15 February 2016 10: 22
      +1
      Quote: cheap trick
      and Russia has a gut against NATO answer!

      Russia does not have a gut, but just common sense and endurance, but there is a limit to everything. Life is a complicated and unpredictable thing, wait and see. Let NATO take care of its gut, or rather its patency, it will soon need it.
      1. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 43
        +2
        Quote: Victor-M
        Quote: cheap trick
        and Russia has a gut against NATO answer!

        Russia does not have a gut, but just common sense and endurance

        call it what you want, but fighting NATO is clearly not part of Russia's plans. That is just why it (NATO) will not call one of its gopniks to the norms of corporate behavior, but mumbles about a "possible" revision of its Charter - it is not entirely clear.
  9. alex-cn
    alex-cn 15 February 2016 10: 11
    +2
    It will be enough if the UN recognizes the aggression of Turkey. This will free NATO from obligations to protect them ... I think that after this the Turks will wither themselves ...
  10. PKK
    PKK 15 February 2016 10: 12
    0
    The US is only urging Erdogan not to touch the Kurds, and Russia is helping them free their lands. Well, and who will they go after that?
  11. EvgNik
    EvgNik 15 February 2016 10: 12
    +1
    Even if there is a veto, but turning to the UN is a serious thing, then you can take measures to counter Turkish aggression. Although the place is more visible than us. I hope that the Syrians know what they are doing.
  12. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 15 February 2016 10: 23
    0
    Yes, it's time for diplomats to work. To expose Turkey as an aggressor, it will be of great benefit to us.
  13. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 15 February 2016 10: 24
    0
    It would probably be right to first complain about Turkey’s actions in international organizations, wait a while, and then fuck it well with these Turkish militants!
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 10: 51
      0
      Quote: dchegrinec
      and then it’s good to fuck these Turkish fighters!

      who will fuck?
  14. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING 15 February 2016 10: 26
    0
    The statement "nowhere"
  15. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 February 2016 10: 35
    0
    Unfortunately, the Ottomans use arrogant tricks, dragging artillery to the very border. The range of confident destruction with this artillery is about 20 km, plus or minus. This entire area will be UNPUNISHED to be fired upon by the Ottomans and nothing can be done with it YET. When they climb over the border, then a different situation will come. Kurds have no equivalent response to Turkish shelling. A "critical mass" of Ottoman mischief is gaining.
  16. koshmarik
    koshmarik 15 February 2016 10: 45
    +1
    At one time, many in the West, and some in our country, after using cruise missiles and strategic aviation of the Russian Armed Forces, reproached Russia for demonstrating muscles, intimidating neighbors, etc. Life has shown that everything was done correctly and in a timely manner. If it weren’t for this, by the way, forced demonstration of power, the Turks would have invaded Syria long ago, and now Erdogan is scratching his turnips hard - it’s understandable, NATO will not get involved in solving personal affairs of the Erdogan family, and Turkey is shot at from all sides - from the Black and Mediterranean seas, from Armenia and Syria, from the airfields of Engels and Mozdok. I think that we will not swing with scimitars and janissaries, but Turkey’s military infrastructure will be gouged for a week.
  17. VP
    VP 15 February 2016 10: 57
    0
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    That's when they climb over the border, then another situation will come.

    The Turkish Minister of Defense said that the talk of sending military personnel to Syria is not even on the agenda.
    Literally
    No thoughts on Turkish soldiers entering Syria

    Either it lets the fog go or the Americans put the squeeze on, they recently hit the Turks about this.
  18. Evil 55
    Evil 55 15 February 2016 11: 00
    0
    The Ottomans will wait ... They will deepen the Russian straits of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles ... So that "Caliber" does not interfere with flying ..
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 15 February 2016 12: 15
      0
      Quote: Angry 55
      They will deepen the Russian straits of the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles ... So that "Caliber" does not interfere with flying ..

      cool. And what is the relationship between calibers and the depth of the straits?
  19. Dave36
    Dave36 15 February 2016 11: 18
    0
    Rzhunemogu ... there will be no reaction, not our war.
  20. Wolka
    Wolka 15 February 2016 11: 29
    0
    or maybe as in Yemen, hit a couple of times with Dots on targets in Turkey, well, it flew by itself, probably from the Moon why the Turks are allowed and the Syrians aren’t ...
  21. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 15 February 2016 14: 20
    0
    Damascus demanded that the UN "put an end" to the crimes of Ankara in Syria.
    At the UN, the same half of the blindly infantile are now sitting.
  22. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 15 February 2016 14: 35
    0
    Quote: MACCABI-TLV
    Who! At least voice the options.

    Russia, together with Iran and Syria, is not enough?