Military Review

The first flight of a light transport IL-112 is scheduled for 2017 g

47
Work on the creation of a light military transport IL-112 go on schedule, its first flight is scheduled for 2017 g, leads MIC a message from Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov, who recently visited the Voronezh Aircraft Building Society (VASO).


The first flight of a light transport IL-112 is scheduled for 2017 g


“United Aircraft Corporation has chosen VASO as the main manufacturer of these aircraft. We renewed the contract for their development. According to the plan, from the middle of 2017, the first flight should take place. According to the reports of the military missions, while the situation is under control, everything is going according to schedule, ”said Borisov.

In addition, "VASO develops special boards for top officials of the state based on wide-body long-haul IL-96 aircraft," the deputy minister added.

He noted that "the level of quality of military products has increased over the past three years and continues to increase."

“This year, on the instructions of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, we will pay special attention to quality. February 15 we have planned to hold a conference together with the industry, where we will discuss issues of raising the level of quality, ”said Borisov.

In turn, the head of the UAC, Yuri Slyusar, expressed confidence that in the future the production of transport aircraft can be measured in "tens and hundreds of units."

“The collectives of the VASO factories and the Il company are doing everything in their power so that in July 2017 of the year IL-112 soars into the sky. This is a very ambitious task. We hope that the efforts undertaken by the VASO team will lead to the desired result. The car is very necessary, "- said Slyusar.

The IL company signed a contract with the Ministry of Defense in 2014 for the construction of two prototypes of the aircraft. In the future, aircraft manufacturers are hoping to receive an order for serial deliveries of vehicles that can start in 2019.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. lelikas
    lelikas 13 February 2016 10: 54
    20
    The prototype of the machine and the draft design were presented to the Ministry of Defense back in December 2004, and in May 2005, the commander of the 61st Air Army, Lieutenant General Viktor Denisov, promised that the IL-112 would fly into the air already in 2006, and in 2007 there would be an installation the consignment.
    Who will we land if we don’t see flights at 17?
    1. Civil
      Civil 13 February 2016 10: 56
      +7
      Quote: lelikas
      The prototype of the machine and the draft design were presented to the Ministry of Defense back in December 2004, and in May 2005, the commander of the 61st Air Army, Lieutenant General Viktor Denisov, promised that the IL-112 would fly into the air already in 2006, and in 2007 there would be an installation the consignment.
      Who will we land if we don’t see flights at 17?

      1. No one.
      2. 17 in such an economy is a fairy tale.
      1. Urals
        Urals 13 February 2016 11: 00
        +8
        Specialists from Antonov, pulled themselves up .. Let the men work! You will succeed ... hi
      2. NIKNN
        NIKNN 13 February 2016 11: 02
        +5
        The aircraft is designed for operation on small, low-equipped airfields with both concrete and unpaved surfaces of runways. For the Il-112 aircraft, a maintenance system will be adopted according to the technical condition without major repairsensuring the maintenance of the required level of airworthiness with minimum operating costs within the assigned resource (45000 flight hours or 30000 flights) and a service life of 35 years

        I don’t know why, but with such a system of exploitation in our (modern economic system with kickbacks and other advanced methods of the economy) it seems 35 years old ...
        1. g1v2
          g1v2 13 February 2016 13: 56
          +5
          IL 112 should replace the An 26, both in the military and in civil aviation. An 26 fly for 30 years, there is no reason to doubt that IL 112 will be a part of the BT and civil airlines for a long time. But the joint with the Indians il214, aka MTS, was stopped in connection with the release of the Indians from the project. It is unclear whether this aircraft will be developed on its own or not.
          In general, we still have to change the Ukrainian en, and KB Ilyushina will rise well on this. Of our 13 VTA aircraft brands, 7 are Ukrainian ANs. In civil aviation, the Academy of Sciences is the third largest fleet of aircraft after Boeing and Airbus. Boeing 337, watermelon 280, and 120 pieces out of a total of 994 passenger aircraft plus transporters. For comparison, there are about 30 passenger cars, 48 ​​yaks so far, there are less than 50 superjets in the Russian Federation. So our aircraft manufacturers have a lot to develop. hi
          1. glasha3032
            glasha3032 13 February 2016 16: 37
            0
            "An-26" fly for 30 years, but in the process of operation they still undergo major overhaul.
      3. Pereira
        Pereira 13 February 2016 11: 09
        +5
        The delay, of course, is monstrous, but the main capital investments have already been made. So it is very possible that they will meet the deadlines.
        1. Baikonur
          Baikonur 13 February 2016 12: 31
          +8
          I would like to introduce this, the opinion (I personally agree): An-26 is a well-known military transport aircraft. In NATO it is called "Whirlwind", in our people it is called "Nastenka". The aircraft has proven itself in difficult conditions of combat operation, and in the Far North. Like all machines developed back in the Soviet Union, the An-26 has a large backlog in design, reliable and easy to operate, in general, a solid army horse that has served for more than a dozen years.
          Unfortunately, any mechanism, and especially such a complex complex as an airplane, has its own limit on modernization and operation.
          In the spring of 2015, the technical design of the Il-112B aircraft was defended in front of the customer (Ministry of Defense), which approved the appearance of the aircraft, the composition of its systems and equipment, and a set of documents. The crew will consist of three people: two pilots and the operator of the onboard systems.
          Our IL-112 should come to replace our Nastenka, according to the Russian Defense Ministry and the designers of the Ilyushin Design Bureau. In principle, aircraft are quite similar in their characteristics. Engine parameters - too. The carrying capacity of the IL-112 is 500 kg more. But this is not the weight that can be considered a plus.
          It is not clear why one change to another freighter, with almost the same characteristics.
          If 70-s TTX An-26 were quite impressive, the performance characteristics of the IL-112 10-to mid-ies 21 century already look a little serious. In 2011, the military has refused to IL-112v now again the topic was raised. Do not blame the fact the notorious program of import substitution, under which corporations want to push projects and developments, so to say, not entirely new. But their own, domestic.
          What is new is good LVTS (light military transport aircraft)
          What and how much can transport trucks carrying capacity of tons 6?
          One car GAZ-66, blank, board. Same old, like the An-26. And why should it be transported somewhere?
          In the cargo and passenger variant, the declared payload of the 44 fighter. We will calculate the weight of a fighter about 80 kg, meaning a well-trained man, and not a draftee with "lamb" weight. A full set of soldiers weighs about 24 kg. This, together with weapons, ammunition, clothing, etc. That is, one fighter with a personal weapon will weigh 105 kg, or even more. 44 passenger x 110 kg = 4840 kg. And this is practically 80% of the board load. According to the staff list, a motor rifle company from 60 to 100 people, from the paratroopers of the company up to 80 people. That is, for one flight it will be possible to transfer an incomplete company, with a minimum of additional armament (MANPADS, ATGMs and others). And throw this company can only be on 1-2,5 thousand km. And this will go from 2 to 5 hours, the speed on the "cruiser" at IL-112 is equal to 480 km / h (in An-26 cruising was 435 km / hour).
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 13 February 2016 12: 32
            +3
            What is the meaning of such a replacement, which are millions of rubles?
            At that time, while we were either launching production, then we were taking off regular projects from it, Brazil not only danced at carnivals. Pictured is the new Brazilian medium transport aircraft designed to replace the C-130 Lockheed. Embraer designers have created a good car for unpaved areas.
            TTX KC-390 impressive:
            - Cruising speed - 920 km \ hour
            - Flight range with a cargo of 19 tons - 6200 km
            - The maximum weight that the machine takes is 23,6 tons
            - The length of the cargo compartment is almost 16 meters, for the C-130 - 12 meters, for the Il-112 - 11,3 meters (with a ramp)
            -Standard load capacity - 14,5 tons
            For comparison, the weight of our BMP-2 - 14 tons, BTR-70 - 11,5 tons, SMP-2 "Tiger" - 6,4 tons. So what and where and for how long can a “new” transporter throw? In addition to half a half of fighters in the area of ​​a big city?
            Although light is incorrect to compare the IL-114 with an average transporters Embraer, we are trying to understand the issue of expediency of such a machine, and replace them AN-26.
            The first aircraft IL-112V series will be built at the Voronezh plant by the end of the year 2016, maybe it will take a worthy place in the ranks of Russian BTA, who knows ....
            Valery Smirnov specifically for avia.pro
            Read more at: http://avia.pro/blog/il-112v
            1. fzr1000
              fzr1000 13 February 2016 13: 14
              0
              Maybe even in the GA they will take it to local lines? And you can forget about Antonov.
            2. gjv
              gjv 13 February 2016 13: 21
              0
              Quote: Baikonur
              Although light is incorrect to compare the IL-114 with an average transporters Embraer, we are trying to understand the issue of expediency of such a machine, and replace them AN-26.

              As, for example, the Indians abandoned the joint development and production of IL-214 with a carrying capacity of 20 tons. But they also do not buy KC-390 (apparently a little expensive request ).
              Instead of the planned 45 pieces, IL-214 ordered 56 pieces of the CASA C-295 with a carrying capacity of 9,7 tons. Still, 9,7 tons with similar dimensions are better than 6 tons in the Il-112.
              And they also planned to repair 40 pieces of An-32 (g / p 7,5 tons) in Ukraine. How are you doing, don’t you know?
            3. gjv
              gjv 13 February 2016 13: 53
              0
              Quote: Baikonur
              we are trying to understand the feasibility of producing such a machine, and replacing it with the An-26.

              As for the direct replacement of the An-26, it would be nice to know how much is involved?
              According to various sources, the Russian Air Force has 30 to 120 flying An-26s (including not only transport, but also special modifications - ASLK, KPA, RR, RT, RTR, Sh, M, D). For many aircraft, data more than 10 years ago, respectively - reliability request . Nevertheless, the youngest of them is 1985, the majority is 1976-80. What is the intensity of flights? Apparently the resource for take-offs and landings is close to exhaustion. Then it is quite logical to replace with new Ilami. hi
            4. g1v2
              g1v2 13 February 2016 14: 04
              0
              The point is import substitution an26, which is now a brand of Ukraine, that is, a hostile state. Importing ALL ans, except for Ruslans, will be expensive, but KB Ilyushina will rise tremendously, and aircraft production in the Russian Federation will increase. The en brands presented in the BTA and in civilian life in the Russian Federation are an24, an 26, an12, an22, an 124, an 72, an 148, an 140. The volume of impot substitution is decent.
          2. Dewa1s
            Dewa1s 16 February 2016 07: 00
            0
            It is not clear why one change to another freighter, with almost the same characteristics.

            What a complicated riddle ...
      4. Zheka40
        Zheka40 13 February 2016 12: 33
        0
        2. Make, will not touch the military budget.
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 13 February 2016 11: 12
      11
      Quote: lelikas
      Who will we land if we don’t see flights at 17?

      We’ll plant them all! Better immediately to the wall! What are you saying nonsense? The company is reborn, unlike the same Saratov aircraft factory, which fell apart four years ago.
      VASO relied on wide-body IL-96-300, IL-96-400T and short-range An-148. For the ruined production of Ilyushinsky machines, say thank you to Deputy Prime Minister Khristenko, who preferred foreign air junk to domestic aircraft. Well, at least there were orders from the presidential squadron - they did not allow the plant to stop, although more than a thousand people were fired.
      An-148 was planned for serial production in wide cooperation with Ukraine, now its fate is in question.
      And with this IL-112, the state itself, then funded the development, then stopped. Could not decide on the need of this transporter for the Air Force. Have finally decided? Well, the factory workers can handle it. There would be money, but not as always.
      I am proud that I had some relation to the Voronezh aircraft plant. The legendary enterprise.
      1. turishev
        turishev 13 February 2016 11: 24
        +5
        He worked at VASO as a design engineer in the department of the chief technologist
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 13 February 2016 11: 30
          +3
          Oh how! I wrote a diploma in this department. Greetings colleague hi
          1. NIKNN
            NIKNN 13 February 2016 12: 06
            +4
            Countrymen drinks A trifle, nice. good
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Michael67
          Michael67 13 February 2016 12: 12
          0
          "Worked for VASO as a design engineer in the department of the chief technologist." Now we need to pass on the experience of young people.
      2. lelikas
        lelikas 13 February 2016 11: 36
        +6
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        We’ll plant them all! Better immediately to the wall! What are you saying nonsense? The company is reborn, unlike the same Saratov aircraft factory, which fell apart four years ago.

        I don’t have any questions for the company, but if I’m interested, I can create a list of everything that was supposed to go, swim, fly, build, get laid by 10mi 15 mu 20 mu year, which will pull the article, u and just sorry that not from the Criminal Code.
        I hope I answered clearly? hi
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock 13 February 2016 12: 04
          0
          What is much more interesting is that with the IL-214? Which we create together with the Hindus, a lifting capacity of 20 tons.
          1. gjv
            gjv 13 February 2016 12: 13
            0
            Quote: Lt. air force reserve
            what is there with IL-214? Which we create together with the Hindus

            In January 2016, Sergey Velmozhkin, General Director of Ilyushin Aviation Complex, announced that the project had been stopped.
            We have an intergovernmental agreement, no one has canceled it, but because of passivity, or rather not because of passivity, but because of the strange position of the Indian side, the caution of the Indian side, the project is actually frozen. To date, the project has been completed.
        2. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 13 February 2016 12: 18
          0
          Quote: lelikas
          what pulls on the article, u and just a pity that not from the Criminal Code

          If there was a man, there would be an article. Just from the Criminal Code. A command from the authorities is needed, and only the relevant law enforcement agencies will work out.
          Quote: lelikas
          I hope I answered clearly?

          It is quite hi
      3. g1v2
        g1v2 13 February 2016 14: 11
        0
        While Ukraine had tolerant relations, it was cheaper and easier to buy aircraft from it, especially since everything was done in cooperation with our manufacturers. Now Ukraine is our opponent and import substitution of anovs is a necessity. So silt 112 and silt 114 went into business, which are the 26 and an24 main planes for local transportation in the Russian Federation. As the main short-range aircraft, the An 148 was planned, but now it will have to be changed to a superjet. Thu Ilyushins should be very grateful to the Americans for the Maidan in Ukraine. If he hadn’t, their projects would have been on the shelf. hi
        1. FID
          FID 13 February 2016 20: 02
          +1
          Quote: g1v2
          The quality of the main short-range aircraft was en 148, but now it will have to be changed to a superjet.

          They will not replace them, the superdromes are needed ... And VASO has already cut a quarter of the salary, two extreme Il-96-300 machines for the SLO will be built, the extreme An-148s for the military will be built and that's all ... top "comrades ...
          1. g1v2
            g1v2 14 February 2016 00: 50
            0
            There was an article on Vaso that Il112 was going to produce. And il114 I think that it will also be produced there. OF course, THE PRODUCTION HAS NOT STARTED, THIS EVERYTHING MAY CHANGE BUT WHILE WRITTEN. hi
        2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Blondy
      Blondy 13 February 2016 12: 06
      0
      My heart feels that it’s necessary to plant - women’s delays, exactly the same as when building a cosmodrome or oceanarium in Vladivostok, when such scandalous things were born about corruption.
  2. Nord2015
    Nord2015 13 February 2016 10: 55
    +1
    An article about plans and intentions. I would like to believe all this, of course, but it would be much more pleasant for me to hear that the company is already releasing much-needed transport aircraft, and passenger ILs, too.
  3. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 13 February 2016 10: 58
    0
    It’s good that we are moving in the right direction. I would like to go faster and that everything would be ours.
  4. midivan
    midivan 13 February 2016 10: 58
    +2
    In addition, "VASO develops special boards for top officials of the state based on wide-body long-haul IL-96 aircraft," the deputy minister added.
    and when will we see the passengers? the pilot (who put the Boeing 777 on one engine in the Dominican Republic) said the interview yesterday, “a smart car”, well, I would love to hear about this from Ilyuha from our pilots sad although a familiar aviation electrician once said that everyone else smokes compared to 96
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 13 February 2016 11: 44
      0
      MS-21 only if.

      The silts were built under communism and today are not viable. And in general, the big question is, is anything viable in the Airbusik and Boeing segments? They are at war with each other, working for a long profit (minimum selling price + ultra-profitable loans / leasing + global service + training centers around the world).

      Orders for Ily are only from budget organizations. None of the businessmen are even interested. Aeroflot spoke extremely negatively about 96 and it was unprofitable for them, it did not fly, etc. Which also did not advertise the aircraft.

      Again, the design efficiency (the number of flight hours per day, the required maintenance, the number of flight personnel on a flight) is obviously lower than even the previous generations of Boeing / Airbus, fuel efficiency is worse.

      You can buy and even fly, but only in two cases:
      - ticket prices remain the same, but the difference pays the budget
      - ticket prices go up, and given that the rest fly to B / A and keep the old price, this is the way to ruin who bought Ily
      1. 73bor
        73bor 13 February 2016 12: 34
        +1
        Although I am not an expert, I don’t believe in your calculations and figures about efficiency and economy, all this is noodles and nothing more, everything flies around and the IL-96 can’t fly only as a presidential one, I’m not talking about compensation to the CEO ” Aeroflot "so that it can skillfully" shit "our planes!
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 13 February 2016 13: 29
          +1
          Faith is such a thing.

          A-380 and Boeings fly with 2 pilots - IL with 3. That is, it is an extra salary, extra space for shift crews. Minus profit.

          Longer service (even taking into account the 1 SC for the whole world - for example, if a board crashes somewhere in Europe / beyond the Urals, then you need to drive it to the SC and it will only be repaired, whereas Airbus and Boeing have the widest network and the nearest SC if not this airport is within a radius of 400km for sure, but for Europe 100km) the procedures themselves are longer - which means more downtime and less money.

          More gluttonous engines.

          And in general, today more IL-96 are parked and disassembled than fly. And they fly only in SLO Russia and in Cuba in a Cuban company - which bought planes for 15% of the cost (the rest went into the credit account, which was then restructured, forgiven).
          1. g1v2
            g1v2 13 February 2016 14: 17
            0
            Well, in my opinion, the main passenger long-haul aircraft in the Russian Federation will still be making an airplane based on silt 96. It seems like work is underway to modernize it to make it competitive. But there is an option that they will do a joint aircraft with the Chinese in order to break into their market. There are only 130 long-haul aircraft in Russian airlines and this market is not enough to recoup such an expensive business as the development of a new long-haul aircraft. Including modernization of the old il96 or joint production in order to enter foreign markets following the example of a superjet. hi
          2. glasha3032
            glasha3032 13 February 2016 16: 57
            +1
            The Cuban company bought it for 15% - this is the money that cost the cosmetic repairs of the out-of-date Il-96. For money and a hat. ALL pilots who piloted the Il-96 note its increased efficiency and fault tolerance compared to other aircraft. The time to failure is even less than that of Boeings and Airbuses, which often fly with a huge list of allowable failures, but still. (2 pilots!) Is not always the right decision. Example - Malaysia - loss of 2 (or 3x?) Boeing777s led the airline to bankruptcy.
          3. 406ppm2gv
            406ppm2gv 13 February 2016 17: 23
            +2
            donavi49 - maybe I don’t understand something. Is there a modification of the IL-96-400 cargo modification, the passenger modification assumes 435 seats. Install PS-90A2 engines than a non-aircraft for GA? especially on the Moscow-Adler, Sevastopol line. 1, 2 classes, berths, flight duration 2-3 hours are not needed there. transportation costs are cheaper + depreciation is cheaper. modernization from 3's crew members to 2's, I’m just sure they will create it at VASO without any problems.
            for me all this is from the crafty, Russian aircraft, to justify the purchase of foreign aircraft, there are kickbacks there.
            1. Falcon
              Falcon 13 February 2016 20: 10
              +1
              Quote: 406ppmp2gv
              donavi49 - maybe I don’t understand something. Is there a modification of the IL-96-400 cargo modification, the passenger modification assumes 435 seats. Install PS-90A2 engines than a non-aircraft for GA? especially on the Moscow-Adler, Sevastopol line. 1, 2 classes, berths, flight duration 2-3 hours are not needed there. transportation costs are cheaper + depreciation is cheaper. modernization from 3's crew members to 2's, I’m just sure they will create it at VASO without any problems.
              for me all this is from the crafty, Russian aircraft, to justify the purchase of foreign aircraft, there are kickbacks there.


              You have not read the onavi49 comments too carefully.

              You rightly said that the lesser problem is to make 2 people in a carriage, instead of three. But the key here is in the presence of customers.

              To my great regret, the IL-96 was created already obsolete, for the international market. 4 engines are always less economical than two. But that is not all. PS-90 is such an engine that it is not worth throwing a miserable one and producing it. In addition to being our most advanced engine, it has grown with a huge amount of problems. Look at the reports of red wings there is no such Tu-204 which PS-90 would not refuse (unfortunately). In addition, its specific consumption greatly loses to foreign competitors. Many years later, his resource was never brought to import counterparts, it is about half as much.

              In addition, the il-96 is still overweight and has constant problems with spare parts. In fact, you can continue for a long time ...

              And kickbacks have nothing to do with it. The main thing here is mathematics. Any "aviator", not a couch one, will tell you the same thing. For example, see the history of the Concorde. It was given to airlines for $ 1 (or something). The IL-96 has about the same fate.
      2. nov_tech.vrn
        nov_tech.vrn 27 June 2016 22: 32
        0
        Aeroflot management carefully destroyed everything that was not Boeing or Airbus, the same An-148 that Aeroflot dismissed under the pretext of inefficiency fly perfectly in the Angara and bring profit, and now flying hospitals are sculpted on VASO based on them
  5. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 13 February 2016 11: 07
    +4
    Yes, the work on this aircraft is going on with difficulty and "viscous", but still it is going. "The road will be mastered by the walking one."
    The Ministry of Defence in the summer of 2010 years suspended financing, despite what has already been partially built four Il-112. For full completion of these machines lack 800 million.

    Ultimately, VACO has produced four models of aircraft, and two of them are flight. Plans to achieve the manufacturers release 18 these machines a year. Another problem was the refusal of the Ministry of Defence of transportation options in the IL-112 2011, in favor of the An-140. For this reason, the development of transport aircraft IL-112 were discontinued.
    Read more at: http://avia.pro/blog/il-112
  6. vic58
    vic58 13 February 2016 11: 07
    +1
    There were Krylov's fables, Borisov's tales began!
    1. midivan
      midivan 13 February 2016 11: 18
      +2
      Quote: vic58
      There were Krylov's fables, Borisov's tales began!

      still unbeliever Thomas was remembered wink
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 13 February 2016 11: 27
    +3
    They tried to help the Ukrop "partners", they strangled the 112th instead of the An 140. Now it is clear that this was a mistake, and it has to be corrected, difficult and expensive. So that's the mistake that is expensive. Otherwise it would have been called differently. Voronezh aircraft plant deserves to work for the good of its own and the Motherland. We got a good vaccination against "tolerance" and liberalism with "Independent".
  8. Corvetkapitan
    Corvetkapitan 13 February 2016 11: 32
    +2
    Aircraft built in Russia, these are jobs created in Russia and a contribution to the industry of Russia. I always have a positive attitude to such events.
    1. glasha3032
      glasha3032 13 February 2016 17: 06
      0
      Here, apparently, the main thing is that the NECESSARY plane should be built, otherwise after the commentary of "Baikonur" above, one may doubt the correctness of the choice of the plane model.
  9. Leprekon
    Leprekon 13 February 2016 11: 36
    +2
    Quote: LÄRZ
    Another problem was the refusal by the Ministry of Defense of the IL-112 transport options in 2011 in favor of the An-140.
    They fed the "brother" who was sitting on two chairs, to the detriment of their own interests.
  10. 52
    52 13 February 2016 11: 58
    +1
    Well, the An-26 comes out to rest little by little, the 72-74 family was originally specific. Something needs to be done, but the IL-112 is not so hot any kind of masterpiece.
  11. pvv113
    pvv113 13 February 2016 12: 02
    +5
    The main characteristics of the aircraft IL-112

    Characteristics of the aircraft:
    profile - screw monoplane with upright straight wing
    crew - 2 pilots
    passenger capacity - 44
    load capacity - 6 t
    length - 23,49 m
    wing span - 25,74 m
    height - 8,9 m
    curb weight - 15 t
    normal take-off weight - 20,4 t
    Max. take-off weight - 21 t
    fuel capacity - 7900 l

    The main characteristics of the power plant:
    number of engines - 2
    engine type - turboprop
    engine - TV7-117ST
    power - 2 × 2800 hp
    propeller - single-row six-blade AV-112
    screw diameter - 3,9 m
    thrust - 3 645 kgf
    afterburner traction - 4 kgf
    fuel consumption - 500 kg / hour

    Aircraft performance characteristics:
    maximum speed - 550 km / h
    cruising speed - 480 km / h
    practical range - 1 km at maximum load, 000 km - 3 tons
    ferry range - 5 km
    practical ceiling - 7 m
    take-off run - 870 m
    run length - 600 m
    http://www.arms-expo.ru/news/archive/okonchatel-noe-reshenie-na-razrabotku-il-11
    2v-mo-rf-do-sih-por-ne-prinyalo23-03-2014-12-26-00/
  12. Valkh
    Valkh 13 February 2016 16: 38
    0
    2017th ???? Rogozin, that he will rivet him ??? - drummer however)))
  13. starper
    starper 15 February 2016 12: 12
    0
    Good afternoon, can someone explain to me that in Russia, the laws of physics do not work? Well, to hell with it, the turbine, there is the profile of the blades, the shape of the combustion chambers and a bunch of all kinds of high-tech bells and whistles. But why are our piston engines so voracious foreign? Regards Starper.