Military Review

Mediterranean training crew of the BOD "Vice Admiral Kulakov"

25
Head of the Press Service of the North fleet Captain 1st Rank Vadim Serga reports that the crew of the large anti-submarine ship "Vice Admiral Kulakov" conducted exercises in the Mediterranean Sea. According to the press service of the fleet, the BOD crew tested the skills of practical grenade throwing using 1 mm multi-barrel rocket-propelled grenade launchers MRG-55.


RIA News cites a fragment of Vadim Sergi’s statement:
During the exercise, the crew of the ship worked out the use of hydroacoustic systems for detecting underwater objects. The personnel of the BPC mine-torpedo warhead carried out a practical grenade launcher using the MRG-1 rocket launchers designed for the ship’s self-defense against underwater sabotage forces and means.


Mediterranean training crew of the BOD "Vice Admiral Kulakov"


The maximum firing range of the IWG-1 is 500 m, the depth of the undermining of a grenade is up to 30 m. The IWG-1 is designed for operation by a calculation of 2-s people.

At the moment, the BOD "Vice Admiral Kulakov" carries out a long hike, launched in October last year. During this time, the crew of the ship took part in exercises to curb drug trafficking at sea. The teachings were called the Arabian monsoon 2015. In total, since the beginning of the BOD campaign, Vice Admiral Kulakov has passed more than 15,5 thousand nautical miles, calling at the ports of Cyprus, Pakistan and Oman.
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimyrych
    Vladimyrych 12 February 2016 13: 39
    +6
    Hard worker ship. When they (1155 and 956) replace it interestingly shines? How interesting are they still able to pull the service ..?
    1. maxiban
      maxiban 12 February 2016 13: 45
      0
      How interesting are they still able to pull the service ..?


      How much will be needed, so much they can.
      1. Urals
        Urals 12 February 2016 13: 53
        0
        Quote: maxiban
        How interesting are they still able to pull the service ..?


        How much will be needed, so much they can.

        Unfortunately, so far it will be .. But if there is anything to kick in!
        "To the enemy, our formidable" Varyag "does not surrender ...." This is in Russian!
        1. lelikas
          lelikas 12 February 2016 16: 16
          0
          Quote: Ural
          Unfortunately, so far it will be .. But if there is anything to kick in!
          "To the enemy, our formidable" Varyag "does not surrender ...." This is in Russian!

          And how many articles dedicated to the anniversary of the battle were on the forum! sad
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 12 February 2016 13: 56
      +4
      Quote: Vladimir
      Hard worker ship. When they (1155 and 956) replace it interestingly shines? How interesting are they still able to pull the service ..?

      Judging by how much their predecessors served, then 1155 will be able to serve for a long time.
      For example, Project 1135 TFR "Ladny" (predecessor of Project 1155), commissioned in 1980, is still serving in the Black Sea Fleet.
      And the ship of the previous project 61 / 61M - SKR "Smetlivy", which was commissioned already in 1969, also serves there. smile

      But with 956 not everything is so simple: the fleet complains about the overly capricious power plant delivered by industry, the industry complains about the curvature of the naval warheads-5.
      1. Sailor
        Sailor 12 February 2016 20: 52
        +1
        I myself can say from the warhead-5, in our defense, if the commander of the warhead is a hard worker, then all the machines will work properly.
    3. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 12 February 2016 14: 17
      0
      It all depends on plans for modernization, when and how much.
      Quote: Vladimir
      Hard worker ship. When they (1155 and 956) replace it interestingly shines? How interesting are they still able to pull the service ..?
    4. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 12 February 2016 15: 58
      +1
      Let us recall the feat of February 12, 1988, the watchmen “Bezavezhetny" and SKR-6, who on that day put a delicious slap on the face of two US Navy ships that brazenly violated the state border of the USSR !!!!!!! Real heroes :))))))
  2. starschina
    starschina 12 February 2016 13: 48
    +2
    no replacement yet! after the trip, probably again in the repair!
  3. Tra-ta-ta
    Tra-ta-ta 12 February 2016 13: 59
    +1
    more than 15,5 thousand nautical miles have passed since the beginning of the campaign BPC “Vice Admiral Kulakov”
    Solidly "screwed up" ..! And the car doesn't even smoke ..
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 12 February 2016 14: 30
      +2
      So there are turbines - they do not smoke. Smoke diesel and KTU.
  4. triglav
    triglav 12 February 2016 14: 02
    +3
    The ship is very good. While there are no new ones, it will be regularly updated.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 12 February 2016 14: 33
      +5
      Not yet. What do you mean by modernization? Installing posts on a new electronic base (monitors)? New antennas and electronic warfare systems, interference and other small things? Then yes, everyone is modernizing like that.

      If we are talking about something more capital, then there are no real plans, and no PCB requests, but no requests.

      Kulakova:
      SAM only in the stern Dagger with a slightly modernized antenna post. They did not find the second post in the nose, so they put Bending and stubs.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 12 February 2016 18: 01
        +1
        Quote: donavi49
        Kulakova:
        SAM only in the stern Dagger with a slightly modernized antenna post. They did not find the second post in the nose, so they put Bending and stubs.

        Moreover, at least something was installed in the bow only with the recent modernization. And before that, "Kulakov" proudly dissected with only one stern air defense system.
        And the USSR is to blame for everything, which did not master the complete set of air defense systems for the first 1155. smile

        By the way, in the photo in Vika there are "Udaloy", "Kulakov" and "Vasilevsky" without both antenna posts of "Dagger" at all. Only 2 bare platforms.
    2. cap
      cap 12 February 2016 15: 51
      -1
      Quote: triglav
      The ship is very good. While there are no new ones, it will be regularly updated.


      Well done sailors. Other details good .
  5. Michael67
    Michael67 12 February 2016 14: 19
    +6
    Well done little brothers. IWG is a good thing. Himself once grumbled. Training is needed, suddenly an ergodanute in a mask and fins will come across ...
  6. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 12 February 2016 14: 46
    +4
    the crew of the large anti-submarine ship "Vice Admiral Kulakov" conducted a training in waters of the Mediterranean Sea.
    Got the hint, Turkish shaitans?
  7. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 12 February 2016 15: 04
    +2
    Interestingly, nowhere on the Turkish beaches thrown out "fur seals" have not been seen? Well, there are tourist or ecological pictures? wassat
  8. Zomanus
    Zomanus 12 February 2016 15: 37
    0
    The launchers would have to load "Calibers".
    There, if I remember correctly, you can load several pieces into one launcher.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 12 February 2016 16: 24
      0
      Quote: Zomanus
      The launchers would have to load "Calibers".
      There, if I remember correctly, you can load several pieces into one launcher.

      I would just remove the second tower, and there, put the mine UVP, there is a lot of space there, should be enough.
  9. Victor jnnjdfy
    Victor jnnjdfy 12 February 2016 15: 51
    +2
    [quote = Alexey RA] [quote = Vladimir]

    Quote: "But with 956, not everything is so simple: the fleet complains about the excessively capricious power plant supplied by the industry, the industry - about the curvature of the naval warhead-5."

    As the greatest manager of all times and peoples Stalin used to say, when someone complained to him about Soviet writers: "I have no other writers for you."
    Therefore, the questions should first of all be to the industry, tk. , at least, they did not provide for the "curvature of the naval warhead warhead-5".
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 12 February 2016 16: 21
      0
      Quote: Victor Jnnjdfy
      Therefore, the questions should first of all be to the industry, tk. , at least, they did not provide for the "curvature of the naval warhead warhead-5".

      Yes, everyone mowed equally. Those factory specialists, sometimes I throw out such pearls that you are amazed ..
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 12 February 2016 18: 06
      -1
      Quote: Victor Jnnjdfy
      Therefore, the questions should first of all be to the industry, tk. , at least, they did not provide for the "curvature of the naval warhead

      As usual, our sailor is unusually curious and extremely playful. Running along the corridor of the only aircraft carrier in Russia, he thoughtlessly poked a button on a pretty unsealed device with his dirty finger and a nibbled fingernail, and hearing a loud pop and the sound of pouring water behind the bulkhead, joyfully jumped and rushed into the bread slicer to steal butter. What does it matter to him that within a few seconds he incapacitated immediately more than a hundred of the best air-to-air anti-aircraft missiles in the world, for each of which the once fraternal Ukraine is fighting over more than one hundred thousand dollars with us according to the best world standards.

      TAVKR "Kuznetsov" - our ship is unique. So last week, while washing the personnel in the bath, they unexpectedly found 200 tons of first-class aviation kerosene, which they lost in combat service four years ago (TAVKR is a heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser).
      (c) Alexander Tolstik - From the Naval Practice
      1. kepmor
        kepmor 12 February 2016 18: 43
        +1
        This is all nonsense and tales of a drunken mattress!
        Apparently, this Fatty is from this category of "buggers from the tank", a lover of tongue scratching ...
        And the "curvature of the naval warhead BCH-5" is just a favorite way of our industry and shifts theft to the fleet!
        The excellent destroyers were ruined due to the fault of our "tsekovskaya elders" and personally Ustinov, who simply pushed through the decision to install fucking "locomotive boilers", which at one time were stamped beyond measure and lay in the warehouses of the Navy's GTU!
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 15 February 2016 10: 18
          0
          Quote: kepmor
          The excellent destroyers were ruined due to the fault of our "tsekovskaya elders" and personally Ustinov, who simply pushed through the decision to install fucking "locomotive boilers", which at one time were stamped beyond measure and lay in the warehouses of the Navy's GTU!

          Are you talking about which of the boilers? On pr. 956 there were 2 types: KVN 98 / 64-2 and KVG-3.
          And the fleet’s complaints about the first type of boilers at 956 are not very clear, since these same boilers were already operated at 1134A and 1143 - and there were no complaints about their shaft.
  10. proud
    proud 13 February 2016 00: 02
    0
    Nevertheless, they were able to build good and most importantly beautiful ships under the Union, although a veteran will still serve the country