Military Review

Why is the United States again starting a cold war with Russia? (The National Interest, USA)

133
Why is the United States again starting a cold war with Russia? (The National Interest, USA)



New draft budget proposed by the president on 2017 year, provides for an increase in the 200% of our military spending in Europe on action against Russia - which is probably the most provocative step in our efforts, clearly aimed at, to encircle this country and create antagonism.

At the same time, spending on LIH is expected to increase by only 50%.

Speaking last week in Washington, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter has publicly stated that Russia is a major threat to US security than LIH, as evidenced by the Russian military actions from Ukraine to Syria. US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, obediently following the administrative rate, expressed the same opinion.

All this is warlike nonsense.

Radical Islam has declared war on the United States, cut off the heads of our citizens, planned and carried out the attacks in the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon, killing our soldiers and marines in Iraq and Afghanistan, and also announced its intention to create a caliphate that would stretch from the Mediterranean to Caspian.

Originated and strengthened in Pakistan and the Caucasus, and spreading from there to Central Asia and beyond, the caliphate will occupy a territory with a population roughly equal to the United States. He will have nuclear weaponwhich the Islamists use without hesitation and without shame of conscience are used to destroy the modern world.

On the other hand, Russia's actions in Ukraine and in Syria represent (as it seems to Moscow) defensive measures aimed at protecting legitimate national interests. According to the Kremlin, Crimea is Russian and has no relation to US national security. From Syria to the borders of Russia as much as from New York to Chicago, and Russia will not allow the establishment of a jihadist regime in Damascus. She just remembers very well that the fifteen thousand Islamist militants fighting in Syria are Chechens, who will then return from there to Russia to cause a new wave of terrorism and cruelty.

As for Ukraine, if the United States would not recognize the overthrow of the legitimately elected president, and instead would support the holding of the country's election campaign and the next election, Viktor Yanukovych is likely to be lost to be held on February 2015 year elections. And there is no doubt that now would be a part of Crimea in Ukraine. And if Ukraine is now in a state of chaos, we must consider what role in this strategic fiasco played the West.

In the same way, we had to agree on the future of Syria, without setting conditions for Assad’s resignation (Moscow refused to participate in this farce - in meaningless “negotiations”, the result of which is already predetermined). In all likelihood, Syria could have prevented this chaos and lawlessness, which now encompassed a large part of the country. Russia would not conduct military operations there, and Europe would not be flooded with flows of refugees who do not assimilate, but are ready to kill and commit terrorist acts.

After the collapse of communism, Russia has focused on internal problems - yes, sometimes solving them contrary to our values. Its leaders and policies are far from perfect and deeply flawed. And if Russia increases its military potential, then this is a trend that we should pay attention to, but this does not mean that we should return it to the status of our enemy.

In matters of military procurement, the NATO countries still spend far more resources than Moscow. There is no evidence that Russia, just like it was in the times when it was the Soviet Union, embarked on the vicious path of global expansion. It is a country that unilaterally withdrew its troops from Eastern Europe, putting an end to the Cold War.

Of course, some very influential people can not put up with it and forget about the cold war, their way of thinking and a career related to the long-standing hostility between the Kremlin and the White House. In particular, they can be found among analysts, strategists and arms dealers.

President Eisenhower, a professional soldier and one of our greatest heroes, was not afraid to warn his fellow countrymen about the danger of the unrestrained growth of the military-industrial complex. And at the same time, those leaders of the Cold War, who were supporters of Ike, understood that weakness provokes others to aggressive actions, and took measures to ensure that the armed forces are sufficiently combat-ready for to deter and defeat those who will harm us.

At the height of the Cold War, President Nixon felt it was important to resolve the dispute with Red China, in order to neutralize the Soviet Union and reduce its impact. President Reagan during the negotiations on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles in the heart of Europe, was not opposed to the Soviet Union to share its missile technology, the SDI program. He announced the end of the Cold War and a walk through Red Square arm in arm with President Gorbachev.

The current approach is completely different: the reduction of military potential, combined with a crude policy towards Russia - a country that could become an ally in the fight against such common enemies as radical Islam and, possibly, growing China.

This policy personifies an amazing and complete inconsistency of the strategic concept and moral ideas. We must cast aside these ridiculous, expensive, unrealizable and uncharacteristic ambitions for Americans, with which we would play the role of a world gendarme and flood the entire planet with troops, interfering in every conflict. We must give preference to a policy that encourages mutually beneficial relations with countries that have similar culture and values, skillfully negotiate in the interests of the country - and at the same time, of course, retaining unmatched defensive potential and military strategy. America was created as a strong and viable republic, rather than a life-losing empire.

At the end of this week - after centuries of disagreement and conflict - the heads of the Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches will take a very significant step. They will not allow long-term alienation in matters of theology and church doctrines to prevent the establishment of new friendly ties and cooperation, to overcome the once insurmountable differences.

The impetus for such a rapprochement could serve as the words of Pope Francis, uttered in 2015 year in Sarajevo. Hinting at growing tensions over the crisis in Ukraine and the Middle East, he warned that “many conflicts in the world are gradually turning into a third world war ... The atmosphere of war "looms over our planet.

Historical the meeting of these two greatest representatives of the Christian faith should be partially perceived as an attempt (albeit initially modest) to prevent an impending catastrophe. I admired what Pope John Paul II did, which helped end the Cold War. And I hope that Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill will be able to begin the process of healing in relations between Moscow and the West and will open a new era of interaction. We must not maintain the “atmosphere of war” hanging over our planet now.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.nationalinterest.org/feature/why-america-restarting-the-cold-war-russia-15183
133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 13 February 2016 14: 41
    52
    Its (Russia) leaders and politics are far from perfect and deeply vicious

    Look at their leaders and their methods. Sinless angels with wings, damn it.

    Medvedev in Munich has now annealed, referring to "Western partners":
    The danger of such approaches is that after 10 and 20 years we will discuss the same topics with you. If, of course, there will be something to discuss at all. Discussions inappropriate within the framework of the world caliphate

    For good reason! Definitely +40 Karma smile
    1. Inok10
      Inok10 13 February 2016 14: 52
      15
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      Its (Russia) leaders and politics are far from perfect and deeply vicious
      Look at their leaders and their methods. Angels with wings, damn it.

      ... the phrase was cut in the same way ... but right there, they smear it with fir:
      And if Russia increases its military potential, then this is a trend that we should pay attention to, but this does not mean that we should return to it the status of our enemy.
      ... something like publications in the mattress press, not very in tune with the statements of Mr. Kerry .. he already seemed to be about to send troops into Syria ... hi
      1. cniza
        cniza 13 February 2016 15: 17
        25
        How did they get their mantras ... Assad must leave, S. Hussein left, Gaddafi got better? We need to achieve Daesh and no compromises on this issue, and let Assyrians decide on Assad after the Daesh is exiled.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 13 February 2016 15: 43
          +5
          Quote: cniza
          How did they get their mantras ... Assad must leave, S. Hussein left, Gaddafi got better? We need to achieve Daesh and no compromises on this issue, and let Assyrians decide on Assad after the Daesh is exiled.

          ... well, here's another "peaceful" statement by Mr. Kerry in Munich:
          "We see no real signs of improvement yet," he said at the Munich Security Conference.
          "The Syrians missed the opportunity for a political settlement," Kerry added.
          RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/syria_peace/20160213/1373941665.html#ixzz403DFsvFF
          ... eloquently ... hi
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 44
            19
            Quote: Inok10
            "The Syrians missed the opportunity for a political settlement," Kerry added.

            This means they decided to start a warrior!
            Wang was right, Obama is the last US president.
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 13 February 2016 15: 50
              +6
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              This means they decided to start a warrior!
              Wang was right, Obama is the last US president.

              ... besides, until the last Syrian, Turk and Saudi ... they themselves will not climb, as well as the "British supposedly gentlemen" .. hi
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 16: 12
                +5
                Quote: Inok10
                ... they themselves will not climb

                They will climb, not infantry, so aviation, drones, axes. Why not. And the most interesting thing is that the French will be in the forefront. I guarantee.
                1. Inok10
                  Inok10 13 February 2016 16: 38
                  +3
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  They will climb, not infantry, so aviation, drones, axes. Why not. And the most interesting thing is that the French will be in the forefront. I guarantee.

                  ... I agree, in such a way they can, as they do from far away and surreptitiously ... brave landsknechts in the person of the Turks-Sudites, errand boys, paddling pads ... "English gentlemen" as an executive officer for mattress mats ...
                2. Tusv
                  Tusv 13 February 2016 16: 47
                  +3
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  the most interesting thing is that the French will be in the forefront.

                  Let me ask, where is such confidence from?
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 17: 23
                    +5
                    Quote: Tusv
                    Let me ask, where is such confidence from?

                    Prostitutes always go in the forefront.
                    1. Tusv
                      Tusv 13 February 2016 18: 02
                      +1
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Prostitutes always go in the forefront.

                      A note about prostitutes is not very. You wanted to say. Cannon fodder?
                      1. sabakina
                        sabakina 13 February 2016 20: 15
                        +3
                        Quote: Tusv
                        Quote: Alexander Romanov
                        Prostitutes always go in the forefront.

                        A note about prostitutes is not very. You wanted to say. Cannon fodder?

                        Guys, it's useless to argue with A. Romanov. He saw the future ....
                      2. Ami du peuple
                        Ami du peuple 13 February 2016 21: 00
                        +3
                        Quote: sabakina
                        Guys, it's useless to argue with A. Romanov. He saw the future ....

                        He actively brings this future closer! Dear members of the forum, tell Romanov to exclude me from his "black list". I promise that I will no longer speak approvingly about the DPRK in general and Kim Jr. in particular with him. bully
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Asadullah
            Asadullah 13 February 2016 19: 55
            +1
            This means they decided to start a warrior!


            Most likely a war in Syria. The only question is that most likely the hands of the Turks and Arabs. The operation, as I understand it, is planned in certain areas where there will be support for the Saudis and Turks. NATO will be the guarantor of the non-infliction of Russian strikes on the territory of Turkey. On the other hand, without aviation, they have nothing to do in Syria. There are a lot of questions, and if everything was so simple, Turkey has long entered Syria.
            1. 72jora72
              72jora72 14 February 2016 07: 13
              0
              . On the other hand, without aviation, they have nothing to do in Syria. There are a lot of questions, and if everything was so simple, Turkey has long entered Syria.
              Today, the Saudis began to transfer their aircraft to the Incirlik base in Turkey .........
      2. sherman1506
        sherman1506 13 February 2016 16: 25
        +8


        There is nothing to add.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 13 February 2016 16: 27
      +5
      Quote: Inok10
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      ... something like publications in the mattress press, not very in tune with the statements of Mr. Kerry .. he already seemed to be about to send troops into Syria ... hi

      Cold war since 1945 and did not end. Incompatibility of Civilizations. We can get along even with anyone on an equal footing, they can only live as bosses and bend everyone.
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 13 February 2016 16: 59
        +5
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Cold war since 1945 and did not end. Incompatibility of Civilizations. We can get along even with anyone on an equal footing, they can only live as bosses and bend everyone.

        ... what has been there since 1945! ... since the 8th century, there were no mattress mattresses then, from the moment of attempts to form the Russian state ... Constantinople was the first, it was necessary to explain by nailing a shield to the gate and the rest of the "preoccupied" every 30-40 years, or even more often ... The Turks are generally "champions", they taught them 12 times ... hi
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 14 February 2016 00: 59
          +1
          Quote: Inok10
          The Turks are generally "champions", they taught them 12 times ...

          Pancake! Well, what careless students we come across! The Germans are the Turks ...
          In this regard, I really liked the answer of the Japanese Mikado to the question of the Führer: why Japan does not enter the war against the Soviet Union.
          The Japanese answered:
          - at Lake Hassan we received an elementary military education
          - on the Halkn-Gol River - average ...
          we are not in a hurry to get higher education, thereby ending our studies. hi
  2. NIKNN
    NIKNN 13 February 2016 14: 59
    21
    A new cold war with Russia will cover all of Europe and America will keep warm from this request eat each other for the glory of the Yankees ....
    US first planted in countries DEMOkratiu. Then you have to buy a paid version ...
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 34
      +5
      Quote: NIKNN
      A new cold war with Russia will cover all of Europe

      And why in the future tense, and now, that the cold warrior is not coming?
    2. gergi
      gergi 13 February 2016 15: 52
      +3
      More precisely, DEMONRACY.
  3. Civil
    Civil 13 February 2016 15: 29
    -9
    Enough on the ears, what about the Russian economy ???
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 36
      +8
      Quote: Civil
      Enough on the ears, what about the Russian economy ???

      Everything is normal with the economy. You can do better, go to the premieres and do it.
      1. onix757
        onix757 13 February 2016 15: 50
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Everything is normal with the economy. You can do better, go to the premieres and do it.

        But what is normal in the economy?
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 54
          +1
          Quote: onix757
          But what is normal in the economy?

          Do you die of hunger? Most recently, they shouted that they were ready to tighten their belts.
          1. onix757
            onix757 13 February 2016 15: 59
            +1
            Do you die of hunger?

            But what, the state of the economy is estimated by the live weight of its citizens? And so long? And then, I want to remind you about the decrease in salaries in real terms with the general rise in price of goods and services. 80% of the population are poor or poor. And what's normal?
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Most recently, they shouted that they were ready to tighten their belts.

            No, I never said that I was ready to sacrifice for the interests of the feudal lords. Not for this power.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 16: 15
              +5
              Quote: onix757
              80% of the population are poor or poor. And what's normal?

              Stop whistling for me, I’m in Russia myself. Life has become more difficult, but we have not become poor.
              Quote: onix757
              And what's normal?

              Well, return the Crimea, leave Donbass, drain the Assad and lift the sanctions. Will you again eat your parmesan. Just one question, do not choke?
              1. vsoltan
                vsoltan 13 February 2016 16: 41
                +5
                Romanov, of course you are a moderator ... but rude to what?
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 17: 21
                  +1
                  Quote: vsoltan
                  but rude to what?

                  Do not be rude, I ask!
                2. sabakina
                  sabakina 13 February 2016 20: 22
                  +3
                  I would post a couple of screenshots with the words of the moderators, but clean up the bastards ...
                  P.S. A. Romanov still keeps ignoring me. Fears...
              2. EvgNik
                EvgNik 13 February 2016 18: 53
                +1
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Well, return the Crimea, leave the Donbass, drain the Assad and lift the sanctions

                Parmesan will be allowed (in the form of an incentive), but sanctions will not be lifted. They can be removed in one case - if instead of Putin there will be Khodor or Navalny. But we will not agree to this in any way.
          2. EvgNik
            EvgNik 13 February 2016 18: 48
            +3
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Do you die of hunger? Most recently, they shouted that they were ready to tighten their belts.

            No, we did not die of hunger even in the 90s, and now we will survive. But this does not mean that the economy is full of lace.
      2. Villon
        Villon 14 February 2016 01: 34
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Civil
        Enough on the ears, what about the Russian economy ???

        Everything is normal with the economy. You can do better, go to the premieres and do it.

        Our prime minister goes out of his way to show people that he is taking at least some steps to improve the economy. And here's how you cut: "Everything is normal with the economy." You need this in the premiere. With you there, the last headache in the government about the economy would have stopped.
    2. gergi
      gergi 13 February 2016 15: 54
      0
      What's with her? It seems to be alive, contrary to the efforts of Mr. Medvedev and others like him. Do not wait!
    3. NIKNN
      NIKNN 13 February 2016 16: 58
      +6
      Quote: Civil
      Enough on the ears, what about the Russian economy ???


      The strength of the state’s economy is not in linking world oil trade to its currency and not in the trillionth national debt.
  4. Misha Honest
    Misha Honest 13 February 2016 15: 29
    13
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Look at their leaders and their methods. Sinless angels with wings, damn it.

    Medvedev in Munich has now annealed, referring to "Western partners":
    The danger of such approaches is that after 10 and 20 years we will discuss the same topics with you. If, of course, there will be something to discuss at all. Discussions inappropriate within the framework of the world caliphate
    For good reason! Definitely +40 Karma

    But Kerry, now (on P24 an hour ago showing his performance on the air) again called Russia the main threat to all living things and accused him of all mortal sins, at the same time hinting that Washington was ready to talk with Moscow only if we were completely bent under them!
    Listen to the nonsense that the Secretary General of the United States carried and you will immediately understand that America did not hear us, does not hear and is not going to hear!
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 13 February 2016 15: 43
      +5
      Quote: Misha Honest
      Listen to the nonsense that the US Secretary General carried

      Mish, "US Secretary General" is five! smile
      Quote: Misha Honest
      America did not hear us, does not hear and is not going to hear!

      And this is good. Finally, it will reach our most stubborn Westernizers in power that they are not "partners" for the Americans, but food - and they do not listen to food, they eat it. And, it seems, it is already beginning to reach - just how Dmitry Anatolyevich got excited, he calls things by their proper names.
      1. neri73-r
        neri73-r 13 February 2016 16: 11
        0
        Mish, "US Secretary General" is five! smile


        Let me disagree, Obama is not the Secretary General of the USA, he is the speaker of the Secretary General, the Secretary General of the USA, there are in the shadows, they are not visible, these general secretaries!
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Misha Honest
        Misha Honest 13 February 2016 16: 26
        0
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Mish, "US Secretary General" is five!

        Sorry, Kerry - Gossek of course. laughing I decided to listen to the speech of the enemy - it looks like after that the brains are a little "that" wassat laughing
    2. yuriy55
      yuriy55 13 February 2016 15: 48
      +6
      Quote: Misha Honest
      Listen to the nonsense that the Secretary General of the United States carried and you will immediately understand that America did not hear us, does not hear and is not going to hear!


      There is only one reason why America does not hear us. This reason is deafness. Deafness from the numerous praises of vassals of various kinds, religion and nationality. The property qualification of performers is not important here, the main thing is motive and consistency.

      Should we listen to the undeserved accusations against us from those who incite or enter the war only for the purpose of profit. Our great-grandfathers, grandfathers and fathers saw enough of this in the last century. Apparently our turn has come ...
      soldier
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 13 February 2016 15: 57
        +5
        Quote: yuriy55
        Our great-grandfathers, grandfathers and fathers have seen enough of this in the last century. Apparently our turn has come ...

        No, Yuri Vasilyevich, for us, the 60-year-old train has already left, only if in a partisan war, but I hope our children will not allow this.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 13 February 2016 19: 33
          +5
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          No, Yuri Vasilyevich, for us, the 60-year-old train has already left, only if in a partisan war, but I hope our children will not allow this.

          ... hey, senior citizens ... drinks ... there are also 45 year olds ... not only in the rear by the might, but also in the front line ... soldier
          1. sabakina
            sabakina 13 February 2016 20: 31
            +3
            drinks 48 years old. The shutter is on the right, although I'm left-handed, but I write on the right .... and yes. store either 30 or 45 rounds. The rest is a matter of technology!
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 13 February 2016 21: 34
              +3
              Quote: sabakina
              left-handed, but I write right

              . drinks ... right-handed, but the exact actions are better than the left ... a thread in a needle ... request
    3. gergi
      gergi 13 February 2016 15: 57
      +1
      Yes, they would walk in the forest! What do we care about their hearing, throat, scent? Let them at least settle right on the podium! We must do what we consider necessary and put a bolt on them.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 13 February 2016 16: 12
        0
        Dana Rohrabacker
        is the same name of the person who asked questions in Congress Nuland?
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 13 February 2016 16: 42
    +8
    Why is the US starting the cold war with Russia again?

    The answer to this question is very easy to find if one knows the techniques of demagogy used by the Western press. In this case, they use the opponent’s accusations of what you do yourself.

    So what is Russia being blamed for?
    - the organization of wars and the creation of the image of the enemy in order to distract the attention of the population from economic problems;
    - aggressive strategy in Europe;
    - an attempt to subjugate Europe in the economic and political spheres;
    - propaganda and lies;
    - attempts to dismember the states;
    - bomb Syrians to send more refugees to the EU;

    And much more, but that’s enough.
    1) The USA "got out" from the crisis of the bursting bubble of 2008, having more than doubled the already astronomical national debt. Of course, working on reducing it and paying off debts to creditors is difficult and unpopular: budgetary savings are required, at such a pace you can quickly fly out of the chair (and so the already huge social sector is pressing). The quantitative easing program with zero refinancing rates has exhausted itself. The living standards of many Americans are declining, stratification is growing, new markets are not ready to create strong demand for American goods. It's time to blame everything on external enemies - terrorists, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Russia. In conditions when the population is again threatened by the old enemy, there is no time for the national debt! And the military-industrial complex will get hold of new orders.
    2) At the same time, the States are putting pressure on their satellites in Europe to open the last unoccupied wealthy market through TTIP. The expansion of the US military presence in Europe will prevent thoughts of independent politics (foreign and economic), and the wave of refugees caught up by the Allies can give a jackpot - create barriers within the EU itself, in which it becomes more profitable to buy American goods than local ones.
    3) The destruction of independent countries like Afghanistan (you can’t build bases under the Taliban, you won’t take hydrocarbons and drug trafficking), Iraq (a similar story), Libya (large gold reserves stolen by the United States, plans to create your own currency and undermine the dollar’s ​​weight) - This is just the American method of dealing with an economic opponent. Assad does not want to give hydrocarbons transit to American satellites under control.
    4) I'm just silent about lies and propaganda)
  • onix757
    onix757 13 February 2016 14: 41
    -9
    Because our elite is terrified as it is afraid of this very war in any form. They feel they are masters of the situation.
    1. Baikonur
      Baikonur 13 February 2016 14: 49
      19
      Why is the US starting the cold war with Russia again?
      Do not start, but continue! Because the BASIS of relations with Russia is DOCTRINE ALENA DALLAS, Director of the CIA, US CIA Directive 1945 (Abridged version) http://www.probujdenie.ru/novosti/process.html

      We will throw everything that we have, all gold, all material power and resources to fool, and fool people. The human brain, the minds of people are capable of change. Having sowed chaos in Russia, we will quietly replace their values ​​with fake ones and make them believe in these fake values ​​... We will find our like-minded people, our assistants and allies in Russia itself. Episode by episode will be played out on a grandiose scale tragedy of the death of the most rebellious people on earth, the final irreversible fading of his self-consciousness ...
      For example, we will gradually erase their social essence from literature and art, alienate artists, discourage them from engaging in image, investigation (research), or something, of the processes that occur in the depths of the masses. Literature, theaters, cinema, the press - everything will depict and glorify the most base human feelings, we will in every way support and raise the so-called artists who will instill and hammer into the human mind the cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal - in a word, all immorality . In government, we will create chaos and confusion, discreetly, but actively and constantly we will promote tyranny of officials, bribe takers, unscrupulousness, bureaucracy and red tape will bring to virtue. We will ridicule honesty and decency - they will not be needed by anyone, they will turn into a relic of the past. Rudeness and arrogance, lies and deceit, drunkenness and drug addiction, animal fear of each other and shameless betrayal, nationalism and enmity of peoples, primarily enmity and hatred of the Russian people - all this we will cleverly and inconspicuously cultivate, all this will bloom in a double color . And only a few, very few will guess or even understand what is happening. But we will put these people in a helpless position, turn them into a laughing stock, find a way to slander them and declare them to be the scum of society ... We will shake generation after generation ... We will fight for people from childhood, youth, we will always make the main bet on youth, we will decompose, corrupt, and corrupt it.
      1. Platonich
        Platonich 13 February 2016 15: 30
        +7
        And I want to note they succeed! Look at how many drug addicts, prostitutes, rapists, suicides, etc. have become. Morality has long been on its side thanks to our policy in culture and education. Where are Russian songs, dances, communication on art, morality. On the road, one hamlo! Everyone needs to unite, create Russian societies on the history of Russia, its culture and art. Need to grow PATRIOTS!
        1. gergi
          gergi 13 February 2016 16: 08
          +2
          Who wanted to see what he saw. And on the hamloe in the minority, and in life. No need to be a bore and a defeatist. Communicate better with children and grandchildren; communication should be interesting. Their patriotism depends on you.
        2. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 13 February 2016 23: 49
          0
          That's only at home and at their allies, they succeeded much more! And this.... hi patriots are raised, not raised.
        3. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 13 February 2016 23: 49
          0
          That's only at home and at their allies, they succeeded much more! And this.... hi patriots are raised, not raised.
      2. gergi
        gergi 13 February 2016 16: 04
        0
        Chatter, idle talk. They’ll give up everything. The toad will not strangle? I especially liked gold.
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 13 February 2016 14: 56
      -3
      Quote: onix757
      Because our elite is terrified as it is afraid of this very war in any form. They feel they are masters of the situation.

      Top - the government is afraid of war. Bottoms - the people simply hate it with all their organic cells. Who are the masters of the situation here?
      1. onix757
        onix757 13 February 2016 15: 08
        0
        Quote: Tusv
        Who are the masters of the situation here?

        Of course, the alliance. They see all the fears of our elites and weaknesses. And the people ... our great people and when he has nothing to lose, he will prove himself in all its glory.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 38
          +2
          Quote: onix757
          And the people ... our great people and when he has nothing to lose, he will prove himself in all its glory.

          You are waiting for the revolution. Fig to you. The communists will never be in power.
          And yet, the warriors are not afraid, only a complete fool!
          1. onix757
            onix757 13 February 2016 15: 47
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            You are waiting for the revolution. Fig to you. The communists will never be in power.
            And yet, the warriors are not afraid, only finished!

            If the feudal regime and their attendants are not replaced by true e patriots, then the country will at best be a mediocre appendage, and cease to exist in the best.
            Threat everyone is afraid of war, but more those who are weaker.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 57
              0
              Quote: onix757
              If feudal regime and

              We do not have a regime, we have a government and a president, a legitimate government. about the regime, you have learned from the State Department to see it.
          2. gergi
            gergi 13 February 2016 16: 13
            0
            The communists pissed off. They went to x ..! Close to prevent power! After the great Stalin, one abomination at the top nested. Potato Zyuganov-bubukalo, him power? Nightmare!
            1. onix757
              onix757 13 February 2016 17: 12
              -2
              Quote: gergi
              The communists pissed off.

              Well of course))) TI that 160 hated communists built and su 27 and moment 29 .. barbarians lol
              1. gergi
                gergi 14 February 2016 00: 37
                +1
                Yeah, and then shit! An empire not built by them shit!
          3. Urals
            Urals 13 February 2016 17: 05
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: onix757
            And the people ... our great people and when he has nothing to lose, he will prove himself in all its glory.

            You are waiting for the revolution. Fig to you. The communists will never be in power.
            And yet, the warriors are not afraid, only a complete fool!

            Sasha and 25 boxes of stewed meat, where did ...? (are people interested?)
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 17: 18
              0
              Quote: Ural
              Sasha and 25 boxes of stewed meat, where did ...?

              Banshee gobbled up
              1. The comment was deleted.
        2. yuriy55
          yuriy55 13 February 2016 16: 00
          +2
          Quote: onix757
          Quote: Tusv
          Who are the masters of the situation here?

          Of course, the alliance. They see all the fears of our elites and weaknesses ...


          Being an observing host may not be. The guard also watches ... Only he does not become the master. Our elite, our elite ... Who is this - our elite? Our Russian elite is not oligarchs with their capital and not officials. The real elite are those whose names hold strong glory and honor, power and strength of our Fatherland ...
          soldier
        3. Tusv
          Tusv 13 February 2016 16: 10
          +1
          Quote: onix757
          Of course, the alliance. They see all the fears of our elites and weaknesses. And the people ... our great people and when he has nothing to lose, he will prove himself in all its glory.

          My grandmother darned one fighter from the second shock 10 times. Better not. War is scary for all but exceptional. Just listen to the come away version of Melinda
    3. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 36
      +1
      Quote: onix757
      Because our elite is terrified as it is afraid of this very war in any form.

      And therefore, now it is spreading in Syria those whom the Americans are arming and training. Are there any brains?
      1. onix757
        onix757 13 February 2016 15: 41
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And therefore, now it is spreading in Syria those whom the Americans are arming and training. Are there any brains?

        Do you have a feeling in the strangeness of such a "runaway", at the slightest danger of collisions with the interests of the United States to hide in the bushes?
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 15: 53
          +5
          Quote: onix757
          Do you have a feeling in the strangeness of such a "runaway", at the slightest danger of collisions with the interests of the United States to hide in the bushes?

          Have we left Syria? We returned the Crimea? We leaked the Donbass?
          What else do we have to do according to yours, so that you don’t think so. Destroy Washington. Or are you so stubborn that you are ready to burn the whole world for your own satisfaction.
          Sit here in crowds and yelling, always not happy with everything around. Why are you not such a patriot in the Donbass or in Syria?
          So I give 100%, God forbid, the warrior will begin really about which you are so dreaming, and if by that time the Internet will work. ..You are at the beginning of this warrior, blame Putin or Medvedev .forgetting that you dreamed about them.
          I don’t have words to express your contempt like you. So, how do you spit that millions around you will die. For you, the main thing is your own ambitions based on self-esteem. And there is nothing else in you!
          1. Mainbeam
            Mainbeam 13 February 2016 16: 04
            +4
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            like you don't care that millions around you will die

            Romanov, I don’t recognize! I do not believe!
            Boat wrote and signed by "Romanov"

            .
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 16: 18
              +1
              Quote: MainBeam
              The bot wrote and signed "Romanov".

              All day long I read the comments of "very smart people" who can't stand it when the warrior will begin.
              1. Urals
                Urals 13 February 2016 17: 09
                0
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Quote: MainBeam
                The bot wrote and signed "Romanov".

                All day long I read the comments of "very smart people" who can't stand it when the warrior will begin.

                We are interested in something else ... Alexander! bully Calm down and answer simply ... bully
            2. gergi
              gergi 14 February 2016 00: 42
              +1
              He wrote everything correctly. Wars want those who are afraid to pinch their finger.
          2. onix757
            onix757 13 February 2016 16: 08
            -2
            Listen, drop your petty rhetoric. Better explain why the Americans were afraid of a conflict with the USSR, and the Russian Federation simply stupidly fear?
            1. PHANTOM-AS
              PHANTOM-AS 13 February 2016 16: 12
              +5
              Quote: onix757
              and the Russian Federation is just stupidly frightened?

              trolling laughing
            2. sabakina
              sabakina 13 February 2016 20: 39
              +2
              Quote: onix757
              Listen, drop your petty rhetoric. Better explain why the Americans were afraid of a conflict with the USSR, and the Russian Federation simply stupidly fear?

              I don’t understand ... Who are you talking to? To Romanov? This is a monument! Who will put him in prison? (or still plant?)
            3. gergi
              gergi 15 February 2016 09: 52
              0
              The masters of the spoken genre came to power in Ameritse. Pi.dobola, simply put.
    4. gergi
      gergi 13 February 2016 16: 00
      +3
      Only full idiots are not afraid of war. They, too, do not weaken us weakly.
      1. Urals
        Urals 13 February 2016 18: 05
        0
        Quote: gergi
        Only full idiots are not afraid of war. They, too, do not weaken us weakly.

        You are right of course ..! I'm interested in Atalef ... (Old, he threw a specific one ..))) And he disappeared .. They all deleted!
  • RUSS
    RUSS 13 February 2016 14: 44
    +6
    Why does hedgehog understand.
    The question must be posed: "The United States is starting a new Cold War, how can we answer?"
    1. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK 13 February 2016 14: 53
      -1
      "by tightening the belts on the spine"
      1. Simon
        Simon 13 February 2016 15: 48
        +4
        Only the development of the economy, which was ruined under Yeltsin, will help us.
      2. evge-malyshev
        evge-malyshev 13 February 2016 16: 26
        +2
        Quote: AdekvatNICK
        "by tightening the belts on the spine"


        Are you starving?
        1. Mainbeam
          Mainbeam 13 February 2016 17: 06
          -4
          Quote: evge-malyshev

          Are you starving?


          in December 2015, 3% of Russians did not even have enough money for food. At present, a little more than a tenth of the respondents (14%) can buy food, but they no longer have enough money to buy clothes. ”These are people living in a struggle for physical survival, although the category of clothing is methodologically very fuzzy and blurs the poverty line (for whom then there is not enough money for new branded clothes, and someone has nothing to protect themselves from the cold).

          More than half of Russians (58%) say that they can buy groceries and clothes, but there is no money to purchase large household appliances or TV. "This is the level at which life is possible, but not modern, because its attributes are exactly in this category of goods.

          http://7x7-journal.ru/post/75778
  • AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 13 February 2016 14: 45
    11
    Just Medvedev, at a security conference in Munich

    “It can be said more sharply: we slipped into the times of the new Cold War,” said the head of the Russian government, speaking at the Munich conference on security issues.

    Almost every day, Russia is declared the most terrible threat to almost the entire world; in some countries, films are made in which Russians start a nuclear war. "I sometimes think: are we living in 2016 or in 1962?" - suggested Medvedev to think about what is happening.

    “Our intensive dialogue on the future architecture of Euro-Atlantic security, on global stability, on regional threats is now especially necessary,” the head of the Cabinet emphasized.

    Instead, it broke off in almost all directions, the mechanisms that made it possible to timely remove mutual concerns were paralyzed. “Moreover, we have lost the culture of mutual arms control,” added Dmitry Medvedev. “Although for a long time it was this culture that served as the basis for building confidence.”
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. cniza
        cniza 13 February 2016 15: 36
        +3
        Quote: MainBeam
        Quote: AdekvatNICK
        "I sometimes think: we in 2016 year we live or in 1962? "- suggested Medvedev to think about

        What does he remember about 1962? He was born in 1965. Populist, yo-damn. Eifanchik.




        He does not convincingly say that he agrees, but you can read about 1962 and you do not have to be a participant in the events yourself.
        1. Mainbeam
          Mainbeam 13 February 2016 15: 47
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          it’s not necessary to be a participant in the events

          I disagree with you. The topic does not work for serious politicians "one grandmother said". Having read a clever book or watched a Hollywood movie about K-19, it does not make you a participant in those events. And your modern listeners will not be impressed either. We all know that there was a Cold War. But sending us back in 1962 is nothing gives concrete neither to me nor to you - populism.
          1. Mainbeam
            Mainbeam 13 February 2016 15: 56
            +5
            Hi to moderators! I see, the kosher topic regarding the heads of our state on the site is being cleaned up in the bud! Yes, the site, apparently, enjoys authority among a wide range of subscribers. Did the directive come? Removing posts without comment is not beautiful, without punishment is stupid. Or KGB officers indulge?
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 13 February 2016 16: 20
              0
              Quote: MainBeam
              I see, the kosher topic regarding the heads of our state on the site is being cleaned up in the bud!

              Idiocy at the root. Rather, I would like it to be so. I did not have time to remove the laces and there is no comment.
              Quote: MainBeam
              Did the directive come?

              Yes from the FSB
              Quote: MainBeam
              Removing posts without comments is not beautiful

              For the picture with the laces, the post was deleted.
              1. Mainbeam
                Mainbeam 13 February 2016 16: 53
                0
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Idiocy in the bud

                There is a lot of idiocy on the site, but you won’t erase it.
                But the "laces" - in less than 3 minutes. Promptly.
                Sick, apparently, a topic for the government our country.

                .
        2. gergi
          gergi 13 February 2016 16: 20
          +2
          In, it turns out, HE sometimes thinks! What happiness! Thinker, not Khuhra-Muhrah!
        3. EvgNik
          EvgNik 13 February 2016 19: 05
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          about 1962 you can read and do not have to be a participant in the events.

          About the times of the USSR, you can also read books (for those who were born later), and read. Solzhenitsyn. And draw conclusions. Those that the West needs. I didn’t put a minus, but I agree with the authors of the minuses.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. gergi
      gergi 13 February 2016 16: 17
      +1
      When this type says something, sort of the right words, the impression is that he is make-believe. He's all pretense. Why was this empty place sent there? Lavrov interfere?
      1. Urals
        Urals 13 February 2016 18: 28
        0
        All quiet men ... hi
      2. Saratoga833
        Saratoga833 13 February 2016 19: 10
        +3
        Quote: gergi
        Lavrov interfere?

        This "empty space" not only hinders Lavrov. He has no place in government at all. And next to him the same.
  • newcomer
    newcomer 13 February 2016 14: 48
    +5
    modestly, shyly, I would say reluctantly, they are beginning to see in the west. some.
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 13 February 2016 15: 01
      +4
      Quote: newbie
      in the west

      No epiphany. There were such articles earlier, and their share in the total mass does not increase. The article is about nothing. From the point of view of our propaganda machine, this is, like, the correct article, which really reflects the situation in world politics. But in reality - a fog, a screen, a superficial glance. This is not an analytical article, and not a "revelation". This is a populist article for the "broad masses" who do not really bother to understand politics or economics.

      The world is driven by capital. In this case, the US military-industrial capital. Nothing will change. the rhetoric will remain belligerent. The countries of Eastern Europe will first be intimidated by the Russian threat and then "offered" to buy NATO weapons. The Yankos themselves will invent a new "miracle weapon", implementing one billion out of 20 closed projects. The military-industrial machine will continue to spin at the same pace, or even gain momentum.

      Do we threaten states militarily? I think that even stupid Yankees understand that - no. But the Russian Federation curbs chaos in the Middle East and the strengthening of the Russian Federation threatens the crowding out of industrial capital from these countries. But they don’t like it. This is a threat to the states. Therefore, the paid-up politicians of different countries will be hysterical about the Russian threat, like the same Cameron - they write texts in one ideological center.

      The Bush Family is one of Texas's top oil families

      Nothing changes from such articles.
      1. Mainbeam
        Mainbeam 13 February 2016 15: 22
        -1
        All American presidents are from big business, representatives of the richest families of the USA, shareholders of the largest transnational corporations. George W. Bush, Sr. was from the Carlyle Group oil company, and Jr. was from Harkins Oil. Vice President Dick Cheney is from Halliburton, and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice has a lot to do with ExxonMobil.

        The current US presidential candidate, John McCain, is associated not only with the oil lobby, but also with the banking (the largest US banker Charles Keating finances his election campaign), as well as the military-industrial one. The Clinton family is the shareholder of a dozen major American companies, including Wal-Mart, the world's largest retail chain. Candidate Barack Obama is associated with the engineering and construction lobby.

        And where did the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair go? He has been appointed to the board of JPMorgan, the largest multinational bank. Guru of the American economy and former head of the US Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan works for Deutsche Bank. Ex-Chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schroeder became the head of the board of directors of the operator of the North European Gas Pipeline at Gazprom, which is a strategic project of a large German business.

        Yes, there is an opinion that this chip has already been well penetrated in Russia. The head of the board of the main Russian corporation Gazprom, Dmitry Medvedev, became the president of Russia.

        Read more at http://eizvestia.com/state/full/33218
  • ser-pov
    ser-pov 13 February 2016 14: 51
    +1
    It would be better if we were engaged in the construction of spaceships with us, you look, and in this century we would reach the border of the galaxy! So much dough and everything in arms ... Here comes an asteroid, only then they will start to think. ... Go.
    1. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK 13 February 2016 14: 56
      +1
      this will never happen, the Russia-USA conflict is eternal. Nobody will give in. Even if the asteroid arrives to gouge the asteroid (if gouged) together and then switch back to the Cold War.
      1. gergi
        gergi 13 February 2016 16: 25
        +1
        Why is it eternal? Yusa will die and the conflict will end. And your life, how much the dollar will still live. This is the only thing that holds this infection together and does not let it fall apart.
        1. AdekvatNICK
          AdekvatNICK 14 February 2016 08: 48
          0
          the joke is that she this your yusa will not die because they bury her from the time of the Indians and she still will not die.
    2. onix757
      onix757 13 February 2016 14: 59
      +2
      Quote: ser-pov
      It would be better if we were engaged in the construction of spaceships with us, you look, and in this century we would reach the border of the galaxy!

      They will manage without us. And we do not just need, but it is vitally necessary to learn how to do without them, if we want to be a real power and not a props consisting of PR. But this is no longer with this establishment.
  • Bykov.
    Bykov. 13 February 2016 15: 02
    +5
    American propaganda They so do not want to admit their wrong.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 13 February 2016 15: 56
      +3
      Quote: Bulls.
      . They so do not want to admit their wrong.

      This country has never recognized lies and hypocrisy, and probably never will recognize its criminal nature! SGA is the largest organized criminal group in the world with a bunch of "sixes" running errands! And at least they begin to understand something only when a good return line arrives at them, as it is now in Syria!
  • shinobi
    shinobi 13 February 2016 15: 08
    +5
    They need an enemy that is sane and understandable for a simple layman. And who is not guaranteed to attack first. And all this for purely domestic consumption. It's no secret that the most powerful push for development came at the peak of the Cold War. All of our discoveries and know how They were tied to or near the defense industry. Opposition will be useful to both powers, but it is necessary to keep the satellites in check.
    PS: R. Reagan, when the USSR collapsed, said in a private conversation: We (the West) will regret it very much more than once.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 13 February 2016 15: 50
        +1
        Quote: onix757
        The problem is that the regime in the Russian Federation eats up the Soviet legacy.

        There is no desire to begin srach, but the Soviets did not start from scratch. Ask who prepared the first counterintelligence.
        1. onix757
          onix757 13 February 2016 17: 30
          +1
          Quote: dvina71
          Tips are not out of nowhere started.

          Yes, only the Soviets multiplied by 1000 times and the current bourgeoisie all multiplied by 0. And that is all right.
  • LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 13 February 2016 15: 09
    +2
    Who "sprinkled" this opus?
    Posted by Dana Rohrabacher - A Republican congressman leads a subcommittee on European, Eurasian, and new threats to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
    Not a journalist, but a congressman! Well, come on, at home, these words are clearly and clearly convey to your colleagues. One cannot agree with everything there, but there are grains of common sense and a constructive approach to solving a number of problems.
  • Horst78
    Horst78 13 February 2016 15: 11
    +2
    Everything is quite contradictory. We are both "good" and immediately We are "bad", and then again "good". That's just We are "good" only when We are perceived as a "live target" and "cannon fodder". "Clean up", "kill each other, and We will stand on the sidelines, wait." Familiar, in the Second World War we have already seen it. When we are "praised" it means that something is wrong. The meaning of the article should be read with backward +/- signs. Then everything falls into place.
  • Severok
    Severok 13 February 2016 15: 13
    +3
    If half of the money spent on wars were spent on education, there would be no illiterate people in the world. If there were no illiterates left, Forbes magazine would have been left without its famous rating. If Forbes was left without a rating of the rich - .... (put your own answer)
  • pofigisst74
    pofigisst74 13 February 2016 15: 15
    +5
    The Americans, and indeed the Anglo-Saxons, cannot exist otherwise. From the time of the British Empire to the present, they need to rob other countries for existence. So it was, and it will be so. Unfortunately. request
  • newcomer
    newcomer 13 February 2016 15: 15
    +3
    all this should be over when it’s over. in my opinion the world is going to this. I think there will be no nuclear war, but there is a certain conflict that will put all emphasis inevitably. I’m sure we’ll beat them horns. I think the first will be ottomania and saudi. they run ahead of the porovoz.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • potalevl
    potalevl 13 February 2016 15: 17
    +4
    The task of mattress makers is to bring the world to a common "crappy" denominator, under the control of Fashington. To achieve this goal, according to the mattress, any means are good. Therefore, all those who disagree with this, in the opinion of the Naglo-Saxons, must be destroyed. Hence the conclusion: in order for humanity to continue its existence in peaceful conditions, the Fashington mattress must be wiped off the face of the earth. Nothing personal, ancient wisdom - if you want peace, prepare for war.
  • Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 13 February 2016 15: 19
    +1
    I was even surprised. A normal person in the US Congress. Apparently the electoral system failed.
    1. Baikonur
      Baikonur 14 February 2016 00: 59
      0
      These are machinations!
      They understand everything there! Just d.urachka include for the benefit of business, hose, so to speak! And you accept at face value!
  • dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 13 February 2016 15: 21
    +2
    They probably think that we are afraid of their terrible coalition? As the famous movie hero said: you won’t be afraid of everyone!
  • Masya masya
    Masya masya 13 February 2016 15: 28
    +5
    "Is the US starting a cold war with Russia again?"
    So it never ended! As long as Russia is united, strong, conditions may dictate, we will always be at the cross of the throat ...
  • Alexander_
    Alexander_ 13 February 2016 15: 32
    +2
    Well, the Munich Conference ... There are no options to peacefully negotiate with the exceptional. It is impossible to agree with the Nazis. It is sad that Russia alone confronts international fascism led by the United States. CSTO is silent.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 13 February 2016 15: 54
      +4
      There is nothing surprising here from the beginning Washington together with Tel-Twiv destroyed the USSR using their paid agents like Gorbachev Yeltsin and various Chubais and Abramovichs after that they hoped that the Russia formed on the "ruins" would "crumble" like the Union, but Vladimir Putin did not let their dreams come true and began to strengthen the country and especially its military power. The United States and its satellites, of course, did not like it, but now they cannot do anything with us in view of the sane leadership at the helm of power in the country and the presence of a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons inherited from the USSR and, frankly, economic sanctions do not help much, so they start a new one They simply have no other way out for the Cold War.
      Moreover, in the choice of their opponents, they rank Russia as Iran and China as their enemies, as well as the Daesh (IG) created by the USA itself.
      The Pentagon called Iran, Russia, China and the IG the main challenges for the United States
      Iran, Russia, the Islamic State terrorist group (IS, banned in Russia) and China represent the main challenges for the United States, Pentagon chief Ashton Carter said on Tuesday.
      "China and Russia are our main rivals" in the military industry, the US Secretary of Defense said in Washington. At the same time, he stressed that the United States "does not want any conflicts with any of these countries."
      http://ria.ru/world/20160202/1368789161.html
    2. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 13 February 2016 16: 55
      +2
      It is sad that Russia alone confronts international fascism led by the United States.


      Quote: Alexander_
      CSTO is silent.


      Unfortunately ... One. And the CSTO is silent.
    3. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 13 February 2016 16: 55
      0
      It is sad that Russia alone confronts international fascism led by the United States.


      Quote: Alexander_
      CSTO is silent.


      Unfortunately ... One. And the CSTO is silent.
  • Stariknv
    Stariknv 13 February 2016 15: 42
    +3
    The United States will not calm down until there is such a country as Russia will not Russia come up with an enemy or create for horror money for a military horror stories which are not.
    1. Masya masya
      Masya masya 13 February 2016 15: 51
      +3
      Russia can not be! Rather, they will introduce themselves ...
    2. Masya masya
      Masya masya 13 February 2016 16: 41
      +3
      Russia was, is and will be!
      Let them choke with bile ...
      1. Misha Honest
        Misha Honest 13 February 2016 16: 53
        +1
        Quote: Masya Masya
        Let them choke with bile ...

        In bile - just not choking - they swim in it, like a fish in water. Bile and cynicism for the United States are the two main favorite dishes.
  • valent45
    valent45 13 February 2016 15: 48
    +3
    There was a better opinion of Kerry. The press is obvious. Intimidation begins.
    No matter how the situation turned out like with Mariupol. We need to double the strength and pressure.
    1. onix757
      onix757 13 February 2016 15: 54
      +1
      Quote: valent45
      There was a better opinion of Kerry.

      Keri, like Lavrov, do not belong to themselves, whether they are "guides" and "resistance" of the interests of the states represented. Friendship is like friendship, but ..
      1. Horst78
        Horst78 13 February 2016 16: 10
        +1
        Quote: onix757
        Keri, like Lavrov, do not belong to themselves, whether they are "guides" and "resistance" of the interests of the states represented.

        It seems so, but Keri, in comparison with Lavrov, looks very pale. Lavrov, while still as Russia's representative to the UN (or to the UN), twisted "partners" as he wanted wassat
    2. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 13 February 2016 17: 26
      0
      Quote: valent45
      No matter how the situation with Mariupol


      Never allow a situation
      Aleppo - "Mariupol" by the end of the week, "kindly" provided by the Munich conference to reflect on a ceasefire between the Syrian army and the armed opposition.
  • 1536
    1536 13 February 2016 15: 56
    +2
    Why is the US starting a new Cold War? Very simple. Because they hope that the outcome of this war will be the collapse of Russia into separate "states" controlled by the monopolies of the United States and Western Europe. They succeeded with the USSR, found traitors in the face of the party elite, they hope that it will work with Russia, especially since, as in the case of the USSR, they have someone to rely on.
    1. PHANTOM-AS
      PHANTOM-AS 13 February 2016 16: 01
      0
      Quote: 1536
      Because they hope that the outcome of this war will be the collapse of Russia into separate "states" controlled by the monopolies of the United States and Western Europe.

      And so what? request Can you continue your thought further?
  • Seva
    Seva 13 February 2016 15: 59
    0
    Why is the United States again starting a cold war with Russia? (The National Interest, USA)


    You just need to imagine that it never stopped and will not end until there is the United States, hence all the conclusions
  • andrew42
    andrew42 13 February 2016 16: 38
    +3
    In Syria, you need to crush bandits, reap and reap, and reap. Every day is expensive! It seems a paradox: the more we drive up the bandits in Syria, the less Turkey will have a desire to go there. In fact, there is no paradox. The fewer opponents, the easier it is to meet them.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • Turkir
    Turkir 13 February 2016 17: 19
    0
    Dana Rohrabacher - Dawned.
    Hallelujah!
  • Old26
    Old26 13 February 2016 17: 25
    0
    Quote: valent45
    There was a better opinion of Kerry. The press is obvious. Intimidation begins.

    And what can he do? After all, he only voices what the President tells him. And he seems to be due to the fact that he no longer has to be president - he went to jail. It must be shown that he is cooler than those who will replace him

    Quote: andrew42
    In Syria, you need to crush bandits, reap and reap, and reap. Every day is expensive! The seeming paradox: the more we will drive up the bandits in Syria,

    Syrians must rot. We ourselves can’t do anything alone. Remember the doctrine of the Douai and its failure
  • afrikanez
    afrikanez 13 February 2016 17: 42
    0
    Ashton Carter openly stated that Russia poses a greater threat to US security than ISIS
    Wait America, when the same ISIS begins its full work in your country, then we’ll see what you sing and who you will ask for help. am
  • Corvetkapitan
    Corvetkapitan 13 February 2016 17: 43
    +1
    NATO is a creeping US occupation! A country that has foreign military bases on its territory does not have sovereignty.
  • Urals
    Urals 13 February 2016 17: 44
    0
    But I’ve cut the meat into small pieces today ... (rarely such a pleasure in Russia turns out ..) Fresh ... .. I want a good knife ..
    But seriously, let them go. We are not afraid of blood!
  • hly
    hly 13 February 2016 17: 48
    +4
    What else to add ....
  • Old26
    Old26 13 February 2016 17: 57
    +1
    Quote: Masya Masya
    Russia can not be! Rather, they will introduce themselves ...

    Yes, stop raving, how will they introduce themselves. One friend of mine used to say: "Capitalism (USA) has been rotting for two hundred years - but how does it smell"
    Nothing just like that, especially at our desire, as we want, will not happen. It will not work so that we wake up in the morning, and the USA is no longer there. Do not dream without reason. Now, before the election of a new president, the situation will be escalated, but without crossing the "red line!"
  • Darth Revan
    Darth Revan 13 February 2016 18: 09
    0
    Americans are clearly asking for local exterminatus am
  • 15 apr
    15 apr 13 February 2016 19: 52
    0
    Poor fellow Obama did not get rid of the inferiority complex. It would seem that the president of the most powerful country on the planet, and the ancestors literally two or three generations ago lived in huts. But genetic memory still does not let go ... Hence the decisions are far from generous. By the way, in Anglo-American there is a concept of generosity?
    1. the villain
      the villain 14 February 2016 04: 25
      0
      Quote: 15Apr
      Obama did not get rid of the inferiority complex.

      Yes, he has no inferiority complex. It's just that it's REALLY DEFECTIVE !!!
  • Kuzyakin15
    Kuzyakin15 13 February 2016 21: 36
    +1
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Masya Masya
    Russia can not be! Rather, they will introduce themselves ...

    Yes, stop raving, how will they introduce themselves. One friend of mine used to say: "Capitalism (USA) has been rotting for two hundred years - but how does it smell"
    Nothing just like that, especially at our desire, as we want, will not happen. It will not work so that we wake up in the morning, and the USA is no longer there. Do not dream without reason. Now, before the election of a new president, the situation will be escalated, but without crossing the "red line!"


    Are you sure, Vladimir? Well, what about .... ,, without crossing the ,, red line "?
  • Michael67
    Michael67 13 February 2016 21: 55
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: Inok10
    "The Syrians missed the opportunity for a political settlement," Kerry added.

    This means they decided to start a warrior!
    Wang was right, Obama is the last US president.

    This does not mean the outbreak of war. Well, they missed the political, I will find something else. That Wang is right, many agree. War MUST NOT BE!
  • Sots
    Sots 13 February 2016 21: 56
    0
    I wonder what technology Mr. Reagan would transmit? The technology is beautiful to ride on the ears, probably.

    President Reagan, during negotiations on the elimination of medium- and shorter-range missiles in the very heart of Europe, was not opposed to sharing with the Soviet Union the technology of his anti-missile defense missile program
  • Michael67
    Michael67 13 February 2016 22: 01
    0
    Quote: Sots
    I wonder what technology Mr. Reagan would transmit? The technology is beautiful to ride on the ears, probably.

    President Reagan, during negotiations on the elimination of medium- and shorter-range missiles in the very heart of Europe, was not opposed to sharing with the Soviet Union the technology of his anti-missile defense missile program

    If yes ...
  • anton197103
    anton197103 13 February 2016 23: 26
    0
    Need a symmetrical answer and no curtsy am
  • cergey51046
    cergey51046 14 February 2016 11: 05
    0
    The USA wants to be hegemony, and Russia all the time humiliates the USA and does not allow them to dominate. Descendants of pirates do not know how to live in friendship, they are used to solve all problems from a position of strength. So they suffer from impotent malice.