Military Review

The Pentagon denies participation in the bombing of Aleppo

104
American aviation did not strike Wednesday in the Syrian city of Aleppo, leads Look Pentagon spokesman Stephen Warren.




According to Warren, any reports about the participation of American aircraft in the raid on the city are fabricated.

Another Pentagon spokesman, Jeff Davis, called the statement by the Russian military on this subject “a clear lie.”

The newspaper reminds that on Wednesday, Warren accused the Russian Space Forces of the Russian Federation in striking Aleppo, which resulted in the destruction of two civilian hospitals.

At this, the representative of the Ministry of Defense Igor Konashenkov said on Thursday: “As promised to our American partners, we will not hide the information. Yesterday at Moscow time in 13.55 from the territory of Turkey, by the shortest course directly to Aleppo, two attack aircraft of the US Air Force "A-10" entered the Syrian sky and worked out in full on objects in the city. For some reason, Colonel Warren did not advertise this fly in the direct and, by the way, figuratively, too. ”

The general also drew attention to the fact that Americans in unpleasant situations for themselves always act in the same way. “The first thing that is being done is to drop unsubstantiated accusations in our address in order to ward off all suspicions from ourselves. If this is the case, then soon we will have to hold two briefings: first for ourselves, and then for those guys from the coalition who consider themselves professionals, ”said Konashenkov.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 12 February 2016 08: 32 New
    21
    They, the Americans have unconditional moral principles: "not caught - not a thief."
    1. vyinemeynen
      vyinemeynen 12 February 2016 08: 35 New
      +7
      and "not a thief for that and caught" hi
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 12 February 2016 08: 41 New
        15
        Everything is logical, from their point of view. I needed a reason to run into the Russian Air Force because of the alleged bombing of civilians. And it was cynically organized.
        1. yushch
          yushch 12 February 2016 09: 28 New
          +1
          Quote: Thrall
          Everything is logical, from their point of view. I needed a reason to run into the Russian Air Force because of the alleged bombing of civilians. And it was cynically organized.


          I think there is a slightly different meaning here, our Ministry of Defense has adopted the methods of our Pin.don "partners". As the saying goes, "with their own lard and musals," and as expected, our "partners" once again missed this "outrageous trick" of the Russians, because they did not expect such "impudence" from them. laughing wassat
          1. DIMA45R
            DIMA45R 12 February 2016 12: 11 New
            +1
            The Russian Ministry of Defense responded to Pentagon allegations.
            Official position, Major General Igor Konashenkov
            http://oko-planet.su/politik/politikarm/309860-ministerstvo-oborony-rf-otvetilo-
            na-obvineniya-pentagona.html
        2. aktanir
          aktanir 12 February 2016 09: 32 New
          -3
          ours always check when and where to hit, I don't think it's them. The Americans are also unlikely to bomb those who are now in Aleppo - namely, the "moderate opposition", which they hold on to with their hands and feet and which they themselves sponsor, trying to get rid of Assad. There is, apparently, someone else. Maybe the Assad aviation or the anti-ISIS coalition, represented by other countries, blasted by mistake. The United States could, in theory, substitute bombing for Russia, but not on the territory where the RF Armed Forces have an all-seeing eye in the form of radars, satellite stations, S300 and S400, as well as radars of the Syrian military. Everything is not clear, in general.
          1. Rom14
            Rom14 12 February 2016 12: 27 New
            +1
            There is such a mess that anything can be anything, but it’s not clear why they are standing there with 300 400, EWs, a raven or something to scare? Military, when do you stop making excuses!? It is unlikely that our Fathers would reach Berlin if they would report and make excuses to each mongrel ...
        3. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 12 February 2016 10: 23 New
          +2
          Quote: Thrall
          Everything is logical, from their point of view. I needed a reason to run into the Russian Air Force because of the alleged bombing of civilians. And it was cynically organized.

          Classical provocation.
          At the copper mine, Erdogan expressed threats that Turkey could take action if the humanitarian situation on the border with Turkey deteriorates, meaning that crowds of refugees from Aleppo will rush to him, of which up to 30 thousand have already accumulated on the border. I think that these were overtaken under machine guns, like a human shield, so as not to bomb the "bearded" ones.
          Considering the fact that Turkish aviation cannot take off into the air now. is under an all-seeing eye, mattresses helped them to increase the exodus of civilians and give Erdogan a formal reason to bring in Turkish troops, ostensibly to "protect" civilians from the SAA and Russia. Here and DavutAglu literally three days ago, that was rattling about the historical debt of the Turks to the citizens of Aleppo, the time comes to repay this debt.
      2. dorz
        dorz 12 February 2016 08: 42 New
        +4
        Nasra * b under the door and knock over. How does it look like them
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 12 February 2016 10: 04 New
          +6
          Two briefings for the Russian aerospace forces and for that “guy” from the American coalition in BV representatives of the Russian Ministry of Defense had to hold for a long time - even when in November 2015, the American media issued video footage of the Russian Defense Ministry high-precision air strikes of the Russian Armed Forces for air strikes by US pilots, and the marriage of US pilots was attributed to Russian pilots. And now, the media of France have already taken advantage of similar PLAGIATE.
          So, firstly, Russia must protect its “copyright” in airstrikes on the battlefield in Syria from plagiarism in foreign media! And, secondly, it is necessary to hit the “face” of those provocateurs who blame other people's crimes on Russia.
      3. Truth
        Truth 12 February 2016 08: 43 New
        24
        Everything will fall into place and it will be clear to everyone when, aircraft of unknown origin, striking at civilian targets, will be brought down by anti-aircraft systems, of the same unknown affiliation ...

        п.se. Mattresses do not want to cooperate with us ?! Well, of course, all of their jambs will be in full view.
        1. Mainbeam
          Mainbeam 12 February 2016 08: 54 New
          +8
          Quote: Truth
          will be lost by anti-aircraft systems of the same unknown affiliation

          The same thought came up. If you lose an aircraft, you will not be able to unlock, no matter what you flew or bombed. But, judging by the way they write off their "bombing of peaceful objects" on us, what a howl they will raise at the loss of aircraft! And they won't even explain how these planes appeared in that place.
          1. Temples
            Temples 12 February 2016 09: 03 New
            +3
            Mattresses do not want to cooperate with us ?!

            Wow! Five points! laughing laughing laughing
            TO COLLECT !!!
            Turn into a koala !!!
            Let them coalesce in one mug.
            And in fact, they are simply called out without the letter "o".
          2. Truth
            Truth 12 February 2016 09: 06 New
            +2
            Quote: MainBeam
            how they write off their "bombing of peaceful objects" on us, what howl they will raise when the aircraft are lost

            Well, why ...
            A "noble" provocation (and we are also good at doing this) - shots from "Stingers" (for the reliability of hitting from 3-5 "pipes") from areas presumably occupied by barmaley ...
            They themselves are to blame - they knew who they sell these MANPADS to.

            This is so, just a quick thought, but if you work through it, then there are a dozen of options you can choose for implementation.
            1. taram taramych
              taram taramych 12 February 2016 11: 09 New
              +1
              Why complicate things? Theoretically, the air defense of the SAR can shoot down, in its airspace, everything that flies. But in the Aleppo area, it is now "hot", no matter how long it is, and it is simply not realistic to intercept the "attack aircraft" from the ground. But why did the air interceptors not work, the question?
          3. Koshel2901
            Koshel2901 12 February 2016 10: 23 New
            0
            It's time for their squeals just us
        2. soldat74
          soldat74 12 February 2016 09: 21 New
          +1
          Yes. And yesterday, for the same to me, statements of minuses were instructed.
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          MOSCOW, Feb 11 - RIA News. US attack aircraft staged a bombing on Wednesday in the Syrian city of Aleppo, which they then accused Russia of, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov said Thursday.

          And what, our s-400 will not reach Aleppa? Shoot down nafig, and if possible intercept the pilots, Yes, drag to a universal court. Well, let them do it later, We bombed it or not We!
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Schulz
          Schulz 12 February 2016 09: 54 New
          +6
          Quote: Truth
          Everything will fall into place and it will be clear to everyone when, aircraft of unknown origin, striking at civilian targets, will be brought down by anti-aircraft systems, of the same unknown affiliation ...

          What is the problem? S-400 there for what is it worth, for beauty?
          "This weapon is so powerful and sophisticated that now foreign aircraft have no chance to fly in Syria."
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. REDBLUE
        REDBLUE 12 February 2016 09: 01 New
        +1
        They are the highest race. It’s time to go down to the minke whales to the realities on the earth and rake to the very top
      6. 70BSN
        70BSN 12 February 2016 09: 07 New
        +1
        Well this is purely American .....
      7. Sura
        Sura 12 February 2016 09: 22 New
        0
        and "not a thief for that and caught

        So it is thinking at the level of a teenager that he has spoiled, but I don’t confess to anything, maybe they will.
    2. Bath
      Bath 12 February 2016 08: 36 New
      11
      Well, and what does our briefings suit anyway, nobody in the West listens to the guilty party, there is always one do not mark the beads in front of the pigs
      1. twviewer
        twviewer 12 February 2016 09: 15 New
        +3
        Quote: Bath
        Well, so what do our briefings suit anyway nobody in the West listens to them

        it all depends on how to submit the material
        1. Truth
          Truth 12 February 2016 09: 24 New
          +1
          In 41 seconds, Barmaley remembered Allah-Akbar seven times ...
          And what, pee .. chic gorgeous flew.
    3. Finches
      Finches 12 February 2016 08: 39 New
      +5
      "A lie repeated a thousand times becomes true"ЕфJosef Goebbels - the teacher and idol of the American establishment, including the military .... Only they would be nice to remember that for Josie and his minions, however, it triumphed ....
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 12 February 2016 08: 52 New
        +6
        Veni, Vidi. Vichi translated into English-Lied, Lying, I Will Lie.
      2. Voha_krim
        Voha_krim 12 February 2016 08: 54 New
        15
        Quote: Finches
        A lie repeated a thousand times becomes true "" Joseph Goebbels is a teacher and idol of the American establishment, including the military ...
      3. Schulz
        Schulz 12 February 2016 09: 59 New
        -15 qualifying.
        Quote: Finches
        Only they would be nice to remember

        At the same time, remember this
        1. Finches
          Finches 12 February 2016 10: 17 New
          +3
          Liberal national treasonous ideas are discussed on other sites ...! hi
          1. Schulz
            Schulz 12 February 2016 10: 37 New
            -15 qualifying.
            Quote: Finches
            Liberal national treasonous ideas are discussed on other sites ...! hi

            Are you talking about Kadyrov? Well on this site his ideas are discussed, and people like you also admire them.
            fool
            1. Finches
              Finches 12 February 2016 10: 50 New
              +5
              I’m talking about you! In this case, I completely share Kadyrov’s point of view! Whether you like it or not, I'm sorry, but I don't care.
              1. Schulz
                Schulz 12 February 2016 10: 58 New
                -15 qualifying.
                Quote: Finches
                I fully share Kadyrov’s point of view!

                Which is absolutely no different from Goebbels' "point of view"? I congratulate you!
                1. Finches
                  Finches 12 February 2016 11: 10 New
                  +8
                  Don't distort! I already wrote that we do not have opposition - those whom Kadyrov had in mind! We do not have liberals - in the absolute meaning of this definition! We have people who sell their Motherland for foreign money or throw mud at everything connected with it! This is not opposition to opinion or agreement with the authorities, not a desire to do better - this is an ordinary, lowest betrayal! That's all! Therefore, really, who are they if not "enemies of the people"?
                  For me personally, there is a huge difference between General Vlasov and General Karbyshev. If General Vlasov is sweeter to your heart, then I won’t even congratulate you!
                  1. Schulz
                    Schulz 12 February 2016 11: 30 New
                    -12 qualifying.
                    Quote: Finches
                    Do not distort! I already wrote that we do not have opposition - those whom Kadyrov had in mind! We do not have liberals - in the absolute sense of this definition!

                    "Convenient religion was invented by the Indians ..." Well, enlighten me who, in your understanding, is the opposition and the liberal. It is very interesting to listen to.

                    Quote: Finches
                    We have people who sell their homeland for foreign money or mud everything that is connected with it!

                    Do you want to talk specifically, and not in the abstract style of slogans, as you like about it? Take, for example, Navalny. For example, I constantly read about how he "sells for foreign money ...". Can you specifically tell me who is transferring money to him from abroad and give at least approximate amounts? I see you are a savvy person and you will not "skid".
                    After all, you have already learned how to justify the saying practically word for word of a Russian "patriot" and a Nazi criminal.
                    1. Finches
                      Finches 12 February 2016 11: 53 New
                      +9
                      I will give just one small example from the biography of this "patriot"

                      Mr. Navalny, on the recommendation of no less advanced "patriots" like Kasparov, took a course on the Yale University World Scholarship Program, where he studied not mathematics, but such courses as "American Exceptionalism and Human Rights", "Globalization: A New Incarnation of the Old Process " etc. Even if you do not take into account what they teach there, but the very fact of payment for this study by the US Government is a little alarming ... I will not speak in slogans, and prove that agents of influence are trained at Yale, you yourself can easily figure this out and I will not particularly discuss this, but all the same, I will ask one question - what was so outstanding that Navalny did for Russia? Do not enlighten?
                      1. Schulz
                        Schulz 12 February 2016 12: 39 New
                        -9
                        Quote: Finches
                        I will give just one small example from the biography of this "patriot"

                        Have you heard the question? How much and from whom did he take foreign money? First, answer a simple question and then we'll talk about what Navalny did in comparison with such an outstanding patriot as you, for example.
                        PS: You see the signalman. If it’s not a secret, then which VUS and where did they serve?
                      2. Finches
                        Finches 12 February 2016 12: 50 New
                        +3
                        By the way, I personally did not specify what exactly Bulk took - I wrote about foreign grants for which all kinds of societies organized by these comrades live! You asked specifically about Navalny, and I answered what is a fact!

                        Multichannel telecommunication systems. The current officer. He began to serve in ZabVO.
                      3. Schulz
                        Schulz 12 February 2016 13: 02 New
                        -7
                        Quote: Finches
                        By the way, I personally did not specify what exactly Bulk took - I wrote about foreign grants for which all kinds of societies organized by these comrades live!

                        The Dynasty Foundation, for example?
                      4. Finches
                        Finches 12 February 2016 13: 11 New
                        +2
                        Why not? Under the guise of such organizations, supposedly helping Russian education, the support of young scientists ... this Russian education was buried in our country, and brain drain streams turned into full-flowing rivers! How these comrades recruit smart students by bribing them with the prospect of working for Western companies - I know very well!
              2. Manul
                Manul 12 February 2016 12: 33 New
                +3
                Quote: Schulz
                Can you specifically tell me who is transferring money to him from abroad and give at least approximate amounts? I see you are a savvy person and will not "skid".

                At the same time, you confirm the words of Goebbels. Do not offer demotivators. There are plenty of confirmed facts when Navalny was hanging out in the USA and talking with our enemies. You still prove useless. Go to your Ukhomats and fake yourself there.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. Schulz
                  Schulz 12 February 2016 12: 57 New
                  -7
                  Quote: Manul
                  There are plenty of confirmed facts when Navalny was hanging out in the USA and talking with our enemies.

                  Here is also a confirmed fact when one famous person was hanging out with another famous person (do you know him or tell me who this is?). Conclusions to do?
                3. Schulz
                  Schulz 12 February 2016 12: 59 New
                  -8
                  And here is another fact
                4. Finches
                  Finches 12 February 2016 13: 06 New
                  +5
                  We are not talking about GDP now - in any case, GDP personally inspires much more respect for me than your Navalny, in spite of the photoshops you posted ... However, even if not Photoshop, it does not really matter. In a very primitive and crude form, this can be expressed with the phrase - Better our thief and despot than American lackey ... but you don’t understand this anyway! Do not write only about slave identity - do not put yourself in a ridiculous position!
                5. Schulz
                  Schulz 12 February 2016 13: 17 New
                  -8
                  Quote: Finches
                  We are not talking about GDP now

                  I didn’t lay it out for you, but to the person who was talking about the proven fact of hanging out with someone.
                  Quote: Finches
                  In any case, I personally have much more respect for GDP than your Navalny, in spite of the photoshop you posted ...

                  Yes to health. You and the man who cut the throat of Russian soldiers is more respected and the man who destroyed millions of his own compatriots. I repeat once again: to your health!
                  Quote: Finches
                  Do not write only about slave identity - do not put yourself in a ridiculous position!

                  That is, you have neither arguments nor facts, just quotes from the TV, and I put myself in a ridiculous position?
                6. Schulz
                  Schulz 12 February 2016 13: 21 New
                  -6
                  Especially liked
                  Better our thief and despot than
                7. Finches
                  Finches 12 February 2016 13: 25 New
                  +4
                  I just brought a fact, but you still get off with common phrases! That's how you always have liberals - there is a lot of noise, there are a lot of raids, but there is little sense ... So you couldn’t write what Navalny did good for Russia ! And you can’t. Because - besides harm, nothing! For this I take my leave, for neh ...!
                8. Schulz
                  Schulz 12 February 2016 13: 50 New
                  -6
                  Quote: Finches
                  I just brought the fact

                  You should be in a full house.

                  Quote: Finches
                  So you couldn’t write - what good did Navalny do for Russia! And you can’t.

                  Well, at least:
                  - RosYama
                  - RosZHKH
                  I think you and the hundredth part of this did not. Only in language.

                  Quote: Finches
                  For this I take my leave, for neh ...!

                  For a short time you "savvy" was enough.
        2. Manul
          Manul 12 February 2016 13: 21 New
          +2
          Quote: Schulz
          Here is also a confirmed fact when one famous person was hanging out with another famous person (do you know him or tell me who this is?). Conclusions to do?

          That is, you are not arguing that Navalny receives training manuals from the State Department? Once you immediately translate the arrows .. That is, your Naval actually travels to the states, receives instructions on how to arrange coups in Russia, Kadyrov calls things by their proper names (traitors are traitors), but what is happening in your brain? What are you dreaming about, "gentlemen" liberals? To change the power? Is that all? Do you have any wishes about the development of agriculture, animal husbandry, industry, space programs? Or do you have only one point in your political program - to overthrow Putin? You really got it with your "disclosures".
        3. Schulz
          Schulz 12 February 2016 13: 44 New
          -5
          Quote: Manul

          That is, you do not dispute that Navalny receives manuals from the State Department? Just immediately translate the arrows ..

          Those. if I give a similar example (and not even a similar one, because the fact that the president of the country is hanging out with a thief in law is definitely a fact, and you only have childhood fantasies about some kind of "enemies"), then this is "translating arrows"?

          Quote: Manul
          That is, your Naval really travels to the states, gets instructions there on how to organize coups in Russia,

          Can you, if you do not confirm this in any way, will I call you a yap?
          Quote: Manul
          and what's going on in your brain?

          I think that it’s just all right with me. Even in complete delirium, I personally will never write down the person who killed Russian soldiers as heroes of Russia.

          Quote: Manul
          Do you have any desire for the development of agriculture, livestock, industry, space programs?

          At least I am helping my friend in my former city to maintain a shelter for dogs. And what can you boast about in terms of boosting agriculture and space industry?

          Quote: Manul
          You really got it with your "disclosures".

          I'm not doing this for "ostriches".
        4. Manul
          Manul 13 February 2016 02: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: Schulz
          and you only have childhood fantasies about some kind of "enemies"),

          I’m 40 years old. So you can’t tell me about childhood. I feel great both young and wise. But the fact that you are a child (or a scoundrel, which is more likely), I know for sure. You can’t even make excuses. Everything is obvious. Do you want evidence-in PM. But you don’t get paid for it. Not sure to meet.
        5. Schulz
          Schulz 13 February 2016 09: 53 New
          -1
          Quote: Manul

          I am 40 years old. So you can not tell me about childhood.

          And here, how old are you according to your passport? Your thoughts are direct and short, like Pinocchio.
          Quote: Manul
          Do you want evidence-in PM. But you don’t get paid for it. Not sure to meet.

          And rightly so, that they are not sure. What can you talk about besides slogans?
          PS: Yesterday I showed my German colleagues at work (not Russian-speaking, but indigenous) yours (not yours specifically, but
          all this patriotic audience of the site) comments in support and defense of the Hero of Russia Ramzan Kadyrov. He explained that this is one of the most patriotic sites in the Russian Federation, showed a video from YouTube about Kadyrov and Russian prisoners of war, and explained that this is the norm in Russia. That this is the patriots of Russia so militantly stand up for the killer of Russian military personnel and in the next branch stigmatize European tolerance.
          And then these stupid Germans kept asking what the word "skrepy" meant when referring to Russia.
          PS: I think that the VO site will soon become famous throughout Europe. In "Stern" and "Dee Welt" it seems they are going to release articles on this matter. hi
        6. The comment was deleted.
  2. Vasily042
    Vasily042 12 February 2016 15: 54 New
    +1
    Vladimir Putin did not take pictures with Ded Khasan: "Rain" has solved the mystery of the photograph that surprised the blogosphere http://www.newsru.com/russia/17jan2013/khasan.html
  • Cat man null
    Cat man null 12 February 2016 11: 20 New
    +2
    Quote: Schulz
    Which absolutely nothing does not differ from Goebbels' "point of view"? I congratulate you!

    - Absolutely, probably? Well, that’s absolutely so .. the words are similar in places - yes ..

    And so you can already get to the classics, for example: "Lake Baikal looks like a cucumber" - dispute? wink
    1. Schulz
      Schulz 12 February 2016 11: 42 New
      -9
      Quote: Cat Man Null

      Well, that’s absolutely so .. the words are similar in places - yes ..

      Is there an objection to the objection, or are we going to look for commas in the wrong places?
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 12 February 2016 11: 54 New
        +3
        Quote: Schulz
        In the sense of the objection is

        Naturally .. hi

        Quote: Schulz
        or commas in the wrong places will we look for?

        And this is also possible .. what do you prefer? wink

        In terms of meaning - to declare the words of Kadyrov (that’s not a fan of Kadyrov’s, I’m never a fan, but -) identical to the words of Goebbels’s comrade (whom, incidentally, I am also not a fan at all) - this, IMHO, is too much.

        What you were told about. On the example of Lake Baikal and cucumber, yes.

        Actually, that's all for now request
        1. Schulz
          Schulz 12 February 2016 12: 48 New
          -7
          Quote: Cat Man Null

          In terms of meaning - declaring Kadyrov’s words identical with the words of Goebbels’s comrade is, IMHO, a bust.

          Are you generally adequate? Kadyrov said that. Goebbels said that too. Explain to me, please, what is the semantic difference, do not push water in a mortar. But please, not in the style of Zyablitsev that: "we have no opposition" and our liberals are wrong in the broad sense of the word.

          Quote: Cat Man Null

          What you were told about. On the example of Lake Baikal and cucumber, yes.

          Is this the most powerful example you could come up with?
        2. Cat man null
          Cat man null 12 February 2016 13: 04 New
          +2
          Quote: Schulz
          Are you generally adequate?

          Yes, where am I?

          Quote: Schulz
          Is this the most powerful example you could come up with?

          This is the simplest. Ad absurdum - have you heard such a term? This is it.

          Quote: Schulz
          Only please, not in the style of Zyablitsev that: "we have no opposition"

          Why not? Constructive opposition, which would really offer something (preferably useful for the Country), and at the same time could do something else - it really does not exist. A bunch of, excuse me, talkers, which for some reason are usually called "liberals" in our country (well, that's a curse) - is not a constructive opposition, by definition ..

          Moreover, under the Union, the same Navalny, Kasparov and many others would either be expelled from the country (forcibly, without the right to return), or undergo a course of treatment somewhere in the White Pillars. And I still like the current order more than the current one.

          This, I repeat, is my personal opinion. To prove such a question, I, as it were, have no obligation hi
        3. Cynic
          Cynic 12 February 2016 13: 04 New
          +2
          Dear, do not feed the troll, this is NOT HARMFUL for him.
        4. Manul
          Manul 12 February 2016 13: 28 New
          +2
          Quote: Cynic
          Dear no need to feed the troll, this is NOT HARMFUL for him

          I came up with a tongue twister.
          To troll the troll not to troll him, otherwise the troll will troll - it’s easier to balabolit.
        5. Cynic
          Cynic 12 February 2016 15: 43 New
          +3
          Is it trolling?
          A typical representative of shit-cratoliberaltolerasts.
        6. dmikras
          dmikras 12 February 2016 17: 50 New
          0
          But Schulz didn’t change his flags for two hours.
        7. taram taramych
          taram taramych 12 February 2016 18: 09 New
          0
          Do not pay attention to pennants on this resource, when using a proxy server, belonging to any country is difficult to determine. Does it bother you?
  • oldzek
    oldzek 12 February 2016 15: 34 New
    +1
    there is another argument: Goebbels is a bastard and therefore he cannot speak the right words, but if he says these words are wrong and everyone who says the same bastards is also a mistake. much more important what a person thinks and how he acts
  • Nord2015
    Nord2015 12 February 2016 08: 44 New
    +2
    Quote: avvg
    them, the Americans have unconditional moral principles: "not caught - not a thief"

    Genetic memory, probably. Who were the pioneers in the wild west are adventurers and runaway criminals.
  • Samaritan
    Samaritan 12 February 2016 08: 56 New
    +2
    USA - unscrupulous ki and the main terrorists in the world!
    And now they are blaming us for their terrorism! USA must be destroyed!
    "Peaceful" Aleppo:
  • Yugan Oleg
    Yugan Oleg 12 February 2016 09: 00 New
    +5
    avvg
    Is it caught when they shot down? wink
  • Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 12 February 2016 09: 22 New
    +1
    Gee! How not caught? Our evidence is 100%, and the place of take-off, and the route, and the photo above and below, and the Americans know it. laughing
    Dr. Goebbels' tactics will fail them once cool.
  • Koshel2901
    Koshel2901 12 February 2016 10: 21 New
    +1
    Isn’t it time to catch thieves in Syria using the S-300?
  • aleks 62 next
    aleks 62 next 12 February 2016 10: 38 New
    +1
    ..... They, the Americans, have unconditional moral principles: "not caught - not a thief" ...

    ... So what's the problem ???? .... We need to catch it .... With a mousetrap with the name "S-400" ..... And present the corpse of the "mouse" .... Moreover, the "mousetrap" "is there at the official invitation of the authorities .... laughing
  • Wolverine
    Wolverine 12 February 2016 11: 10 New
    0
    It is necessary then to intercept US planes and send them back, or even better to fill up and also say nothing, they did not see anything, they did not hear anything.
  • Juborg
    Juborg 12 February 2016 13: 24 New
    0
    Quote: avvg
    They, the Americans have unconditional moral principles: "not caught - not a thief."


    So the fact of the matter is that they were caught by the hand and poked in the head, but they still "see nothing, nothing I hear."
    1. amirbek
      amirbek 12 February 2016 13: 49 New
      0
      Quote: juborg
      and poked in g about in n about

      by the way about _ovna ... these two pillots are in earnest the whole cabin 10 times littered while flying back laughing
  • Blondy
    Blondy 12 February 2016 15: 29 New
    0
    Yes, no, just caught. Objective monitoring data from any radar station has not disappeared. Kindergarten - thinks that if you poke your finger in another and growl louder, then they will believe more.
  • By001261
    By001261 12 February 2016 08: 34 New
    +5
    Quote: avvg
    They have a principle - "no thief is caught"



    they have the principle to serve ... Russia !!!
  • tchoni
    tchoni 12 February 2016 08: 35 New
    +6
    they have a prince - who has the trunk, he and the rapist. And, it would not be bad to adopt it ...
  • magirus401
    magirus401 12 February 2016 08: 37 New
    +4
    Well done mattresses, a little cant, so we were not there, but if something beautiful, we were the first here
  • Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 12 February 2016 08: 37 New
    +1
    hi The faster you call, the more faithful you will be believed .. The truth is nobody needs .. This is not our method ... am
  • shultc
    shultc 12 February 2016 08: 37 New
    +1
    "... What is strength, brother, and strength is in truth" - Danila Bodrov. Each has its own. Therefore, irrefutable evidence of the treachery of the sheep is needed. And put them online for everyone to see. People need to know.
  • dFG
    dFG 12 February 2016 08: 40 New
    +2
    Everything will be wasted as long as there are only words, if there was such a grouping of satellites in orbit, one could show a couple of three images with these same A-10s and ideally bring down one attack aircraft and present the wreckage .... and yes, you will soon have to carry out two conferences. Since in our time it is possible to lie only to one side and this is not the Russian Federation
  • Doomph
    Doomph 12 February 2016 08: 42 New
    +4
    So it was necessary to bring down those planes. the Americans said that it was not they. It means draws.
  • brasist
    brasist 12 February 2016 08: 43 New
    +1
    According to Warren, any reports about the participation of American aircraft in the raid on the city are fabricated.

    Now it is clear from which country Petyunya caught the "bullshit" virus.
  • gergi
    gergi 12 February 2016 08: 43 New
    +2
    Meanness on meanness. Partners, damn it! With such partners it’s good to eat shit, we still won’t have time to take on the spoon, and they already gobbled up everything. Well, to health.
  • Sanya Rus
    Sanya Rus 12 February 2016 08: 44 New
    +2
    It is necessary to intensify work in the Western sector of the Internet and the media, to refute the Western NATO lie, the NATO talkers have already surpassed their teacher, Goebbels dad.
  • gergi
    gergi 12 February 2016 08: 46 New
    0
    Partners! It’s good to eat shit with such partners, I didn’t have time to take a spoon, but they already ate everything. Well, to health.
  • LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 12 February 2016 08: 48 New
    +2
    The Pentagon denies participation in the bombing of Aleppo
    Star-assed have such "denials" like a fool of a makhorka. What are concrete facts they do not know?
  • Stinger
    Stinger 12 February 2016 08: 49 New
    0
    Warren accused the Russian Aerospace Forces of striking Aleppo, which destroyed two civilian hospitals.

    We know these statements. They are called "Stop the thief". Favorite technique of carriers of democracy.
  • V.ic
    V.ic 12 February 2016 08: 50 New
    +1
    So after all, mattress makers are specialists in hospital bombing (in particular, they bombed "doctors without borders" in Afghanistan).
  • 3vs
    3vs 12 February 2016 08: 51 New
    +1
    Well, of course, "You are lying ... !!!".
    It was necessary to knock down this couple, and then figure it out, they bombed a foreign land.
  • huntsman650
    huntsman650 12 February 2016 08: 55 New
    0
    Ammers do not put us in anything and show it to the whole world, they hold for suckers.
  • pravednik
    pravednik 12 February 2016 08: 57 New
    0
    And in theory, American (US) politicians, as they were prostitutes, remained so. She doesn’t even have a nation. HAVE MEXICANS, HAVE CANADIANS, AND BETWEEN US THEM. Ready to crap everyone and everyone just to show that they are democratic.
  • Wolka
    Wolka 12 February 2016 09: 00 New
    0
    to deny the obvious, facts and evidence are needed, Yankees, but do you have them?
    1. Fat
      Fat 12 February 2016 10: 54 New
      0
      Quote: Volka
      to deny the obvious, facts and evidence are needed, Yankees, but do you have them?

      Facts and evidence they have. Only they are secret... as usual laughing
  • BOB044
    BOB044 12 February 2016 09: 01 New
    +1
    According to Warren, any reports about the participation of American aircraft in the raid on the city are fabricated.
    They began to make excuses, they did not like that Russia poked their mug in their feces. And we also stream data from radars.
  • Papapg
    Papapg 12 February 2016 09: 02 New
    +2
    The verbiage of the media begins to bother, if we claim that the coalition bombed Aleppo, then we have evidence in the form of at least photo control with the routes of the aircraft or something else. In fact, it turns out your word against mine - you bombed, no, it's not me but you. We have S-400 there, moving it into the zone of destruction of the complex, at least we need to agree not to shoot, it is not clear who controls the airspace there? The flyers somehow agree, there were reports about this.
  • Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 12 February 2016 09: 02 New
    +5
    Judging by our actions, the American A-10 were not shot down because they did not threaten the Russian military. Attack aircraft are heading straight for Alepo. Attack aircraft do not threaten the Russian Aerospace Forces - S-400 is silent. And it doesn’t matter for our military who these bombers will bomb: civilians in the city or part of the Syrian army. We Syrians, of course, are allies in the war with ISIS. But we do not fit in with the Syrians, because the attack aircraft did not threaten the Russian Aerospace Forces.

    And now I have a question: will there be an answer if our next plane is shot down?

    And if Turkish or Saudi troops begin to occupy Syrian territories and the Syrian military begin to fight for their homeland with the American coalition, will ours support the Syrians with fire? Or until the Turks come to Latakia, and will sit in the mouth typing water? Is it water? They will probably gather another briefing and tell the whole world what Yankos radishes.

    .
  • afrikanez
    afrikanez 12 February 2016 09: 06 New
    0
    In such a situation, you just need to shoot down planes that crossed the Syrian border. What would then not be "neponyatok" on both sides. stop
  • Alexez
    Alexez 12 February 2016 09: 11 New
    +3
    Well, where is our no-fly zone? - after all, it was clear from the very beginning that if you did not close the Syrian sky, then such provocations would begin.
  • Mera joota
    Mera joota 12 February 2016 09: 16 New
    +3
    "Yesterday at 13:55 Moscow time, two US Air Force A-10 attack aircraft entered the Syrian sky from the territory of Turkey on the shortest course directly to Aleppo and fully worked on objects in the city," Konashenkov told reporters.


    BEFORE:

    “I am sure that even Turkish air defense specialists know that radar stations (radars) monitoring airspace can only record the height, course and speed of an object in the air. None of these radars is capable of establishing the type and nationality of the air object - Russia or the so-called "anti-IS coalition" led by the United States., - said Konashenkov.


    Is it still possible?
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 February 2016 09: 23 New
    +2
    Didn't fly or bomb? Well then, we declare a zone over Aleppo exclusively for our VKS. And the Syrian, of course. All unnecessary "non-flying" will be lost, and already on the wreckage to figure out what "did not fly" there. am
  • Warm Padded Jacket
    Warm Padded Jacket 12 February 2016 09: 32 New
    0
    and if their planes shot down. would they deny that it was them or stink of the whole world?
  • Berber
    Berber 12 February 2016 09: 32 New
    0
    To prove that it’s right is harder when you have to essentially justify yourself. The Americans are using it. Konashenkov has great respect for the idea of ​​double briefings.
  • CRASH
    CRASH 12 February 2016 09: 36 New
    +2
    Yes, everything is clear who bombed.
  • Leo7777
    Leo7777 12 February 2016 09: 36 New
    0
    but in general it is necessary to forbid the NATO members to fly in Syria, and if they refuse, let the Syrian troops bring them down
  • saber
    saber 12 February 2016 09: 38 New
    +5
    I am all gnawed at one idea: to create a fake grouping al Kishmish Asr-Basr for example, and Mosfilm to shoot a bearded uncle in a turban - ibn Mahmud al Hussein, like, let his finger poke at the sky. For a couple of days we launch a duck, they say the Kishmishites have captured a tactical missile ... or two .... The Syrians with sad faces confirm. Ibn Mahmud threatens the invaders on the mosflme and pokes his finger into the sky. Well, this "captured" rocket arrives at the Turkish troops. Russia is in shock! promises to find and punish the reptile! Zakharova expresses condolences, Konashenkov offers to jointly catch the bastard ibn Mahmud! how is the idea?
    1. Dezinto
      Dezinto 12 February 2016 10: 10 New
      0
      Hitropopo however! - that is, brilliant! fellow

      And in truth, why would our specialists not arrange such a large-scale bred, the CIA has been practicing such schemes for a long time.
      1. Fat
        Fat 12 February 2016 11: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: DEZINTO
        Hitropopo however! - that is, brilliant! fellow

        And in truth, why would our specialists not arrange such a large-scale bred, the CIA has been practicing such schemes for a long time.

        ... "Congenial, Shura"Turkish troops in an accelerated march, with the support of the American coalition aviation, to the" place of deployment "of the captured launcher ... And thanks to the publication of the saber (2) RU Today, 09:38 the media are pouring another diarrhea on Russia. No.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Disant
      Disant 12 February 2016 21: 32 New
      0
      saber, disinto!
      a dirty idea that will fall asleep. then they will scream about truth and justice, and all of our super-strong, crystal-clear and open diplomacy will become an empty phrase.
      they just simply stupidly stop believing in the Russian word in the world, but they still believe Russian and even very successfully use it in their interests
      and the exhaust from your idea is scanty. Now everything is more unprincipled and simpler. it’s easier from the submarine to calibrate the caliber (s) on the anchor to the right place. who shot than shot - go figure it out.
      as with mn17 - still cart cart
  • Editor
    Editor 12 February 2016 10: 01 New
    0
    Quote: avvg
    They, the Americans have unconditional moral principles: "not caught - not a thief."


    should I catch the S-400?
  • shelva
    shelva 12 February 2016 10: 03 New
    0
    And with these freaks to agree on a truce ?, will also be the same as in New Russia.
  • mixdiur
    mixdiur 12 February 2016 10: 03 New
    0
    Plagiarism.USA_in_court_suit.This_zhe_ their_ methods!))
  • Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 12 February 2016 10: 04 New
    +5
    I am already sick of the fact that Russia is a constantly “justifying” side. Why doesn't our leadership at any raid by the "Western coalition" shout at all corners that hundreds of civilians have been killed? Konashenkov promises to hold two "briefings" for us and for the "Western coalition" - so he only "promises". It is necessary for a long time to hold "briefings" on the raids of the "Western coalition" so that they are "justified" and not us. there is a feeling that our military and government are unfamiliar with the rules of "information war" and do not understand what needs to be "shouted" first, or the "first cry" is the most memorable and deposited in the minds of the average person. And also this dibble, repeated at all angles calling our enemies "partners" ...
  • evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 12 February 2016 10: 14 New
    0
    Yes ... It's hard for our guys in a real and information war.
    Why not prosecute information lies? Wrote ... and thought. Who can bring them to justice for a lie, if even for conducting outstanding military operations - no responsibility.
  • wandlitz
    wandlitz 12 February 2016 10: 14 New
    +1
    And what did they put C-400 just to frighten the Turks?
    If a shotgun hangs on the stage in the first act, then in the third act it should shoot. It seems so said Anton Pavlovich Chekhov.
    It's time to let C-400 go ...
    1. screw cutter
      screw cutter 12 February 2016 10: 53 New
      +2
      Correctly. As soon as an object appears on the radar, a request is made, the answer is "our" means there is a record of negotiations, the answer is "I do not know" to shoot down nafig.
      1. Rom14
        Rom14 12 February 2016 12: 41 New
        +1
        It’s easy to say - shoot nafig .., but what about briefings then ??
  • Andryukha G
    Andryukha G 12 February 2016 10: 27 New
    +2
    The Americans bombed German cities to the ground together with civilians (the infamous bombing of Dresden by the US and British aircraft - died on February 13-15, 1945 - 25 thousand civilians !!!), especially zealous in those cities that were supposed to be occupied by Soviet troops army, therefore, it is not surprising that the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of those who deliberately bombed civilians in the 45th continue to do their vile deed without remorse after 70 years. Therefore, (as one comrade wrote) we need to collect materials for the new Nuremberg.
  • cap
    cap 12 February 2016 10: 52 New
    0
    "American aircraft did not strike on the Syrian city of Aleppo on Wednesday, Pentagon spokesman Stephen Warren said in a statement."

    Of course, everyone heard from Psaki. But the man is lying too much.
  • koshmarik
    koshmarik 12 February 2016 11: 12 New
    +1
    The Americans stand to the death version that they didn’t bomb the peaceful neighborhoods, if not they, then the Turks - there is no one else, but they are all in the same NATO team. So that everything falls into place. I just don’t understand where did the Russian-American agreement on coordinating aviation flights over Syria go?
  • triglav
    triglav 12 February 2016 11: 12 New
    0
    Of course, the Americans will now deny everything. I said that our media should work in the same way as the Western ones. Watering ideologically. Inflate the smallest news to an unprecedented size. By the way, their A-10 has long been bullshit. They do not have good attack aircraft. And we know which bombers. So you need to wet them morally: let them make excuses.
  • Tra-ta-ta
    Tra-ta-ta 12 February 2016 11: 17 New
    0
    Something "a lot of fog" in this incident ..
    To Aleppo from our base no more than 150 km., I.e. our rockets calmly reach .. And if so, then the pins could not fly on the route without warning our VKS ..
    Those. "flight" was .., but for what purposes ..?
    You just need to find fragments of missiles / bombs .. and everything will be clear and public.
    Konashenko, come down from heaven to earth ..!
    And learn how to sew epaulettes correctly at headquarters .. Ato in one in Russian, and in 2's in Pinsk ...
  • seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 12 February 2016 11: 25 New
    0
    still have to shoot them down in the future.
  • square
    square 12 February 2016 12: 14 New
    0
    According to Warren, any reports about the participation of American aircraft in the raid on the city are fabricated.
    Yeah, and they didn’t bomb the Navruz hospital! Where did you see the maniac who himself came to the police?
  • tatarinalbert35
    tatarinalbert35 12 February 2016 12: 31 New
    0
    and where is the much-vaunted one with 400? where is his work? as always, we work with caution, we’ll beat down 24 more a couple of times, then they will only act !! angry
  • Rom14
    Rom14 12 February 2016 12: 37 New
    +1
    [quote = Truth] Everything will fall into place and it will be clear to everyone when, aircraft of unknown origin, striking at civilian targets, will be interrupted by anti-aircraft systems, of the same unknown affiliation ...

    Your words and the military in the ears !!! They wander around, or do not allow .., and briefings to everyone on x .., no speeches will reach them, only in the forehead, and the stronger, the more respect ...
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 12 February 2016 13: 10 New
      0
      Quote: Truth
      ... aircraft of unknown origin ...

      This is a figure of speech, everyone knows everything there.
      Just for so many years of impunity, the Yusovites have finally blew the roof.
  • garnik64
    garnik64 12 February 2016 13: 01 New
    0
    It is necessary to parachute along the border and escort (flying) airplanes. And if something happens, push them out of the combat zone. And how to do this, you do not need to teach a Russian pilot.
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 12 February 2016 13: 15 New
      0
      Quote: garnik64
      Gotta go around

      Well first, the barрAging, secondly, is not funny.
      hi
  • Whowhy
    Whowhy 12 February 2016 16: 15 New
    0
    All this is just "blah blah blah" - so far there is not a single proof, both from the one side and the other ...
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 12 February 2016 18: 24 New
      0
      Quote: whowhy
      there is no evidence from either side or the other ...

      As tolerantly said.
      Thunderbolt is so easy to confuse with other machines.