Military Review

Saudi Ministry of Defense announced the process of coordinating the start of a ground operation in Syria with the American coalition

104
The Saudi authorities have confirmed their intention to begin a land operation in Syria. Earlier, the Saudi monarchy’s defense minister, Adel al-Jubeir, said that Saudi special forces could appear in Syria in order to carry out “countering terrorist groups” together with representatives of the American coalition. At the same time, Al-Jubeir did not name the dates for the start of the ground operation, nor those groups with which Saudi Arabia is going to fight.


Saudi Ministry of Defense announced the process of coordinating the start of a ground operation in Syria with the American coalition


Today, the adviser to the Minister of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Ahmed Asiri, said that the ground operation of the Saudi special forces in Syria will begin after Riyadh will coordinate its actions with representatives of the American coalition. RIA News Drive fragment statements Asiri:

Saudi Arabia’s announcement of the participation of its troops in a land operation will not be reviewed. The operation will be started as soon as the coalition makes a decision (after agreement).


It should be recalled that the other day the authorities of the United Arab Emirates confirmed their readiness to send a contingent of military to the territory of Syria. At the same time, the UAE is part of the so-called Saudi coalition, as a result of which the number of terrorists in Syria multiplied until the interception of the strategic initiative by the SAR army with the support of the RF AUC.
Photos used:
eadaily.com
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. SAM 5
    SAM 5 11 February 2016 18: 48
    15
    Prepare replenishment for IDISH.
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 11 February 2016 18: 51
      21
      "The concentration of troops in Crimea has been stepped up in connection with the military exercises," Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said in a report to President Vladimir Putin about the surprise exercises in the Southern Military District.
      Obviously not just like that!
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 11 February 2016 18: 55
        +4
        EPRST! is it true that Afghanistan-2 will be in Syria ?! That was the USSR - the USA, and now Russia - the USA + coalition + Saudis + ...! Already the USA will have a part (part) of responsibility for this! Exactly what is needed! Technically!
        God forbid!
        1. Foxmara
          Foxmara 11 February 2016 19: 06
          44
          Quote: Baikonur
          EPRST! is it true that Afghanistan-2 will be in Syria ?!

          Take it higher, Syria in an unsuccessful scenario is the beginning of a world war. Against NATO, if these buggers nevertheless get together, and the United States pushes them especially, it will be difficult for us to stand. Even one Turkey will have to be beaten in full force. The probability of using nuclear weapons is higher, as at a certain level of threat, it will certainly be applied. on the other side do not understand what they are playing with.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Baikonur
            Baikonur 11 February 2016 19: 28
            10
            In general, I had this in mind (world war)! And the fact that
            on the other side do not understand what they are playing with.
            that's for sure! they really don’t understand the consequences and this is dangerous!
            They see that the Nuclear Bomb - just - HUGE BOMB!
            They think: "We have a lot of them, we will kill all the enemies of democracy! Wa-Ha-Ha! And a bottle of Rum!"
            D ..., b ...!
            1. Mahmut
              Mahmut 12 February 2016 06: 04
              +1
              The Saudi army is very well armed, but does not possess combat experience. At the beginning of the ground operation, he immediately enters the environment of the IG and transfers his weapons to them. Such an idea may be associated with the closure of the Syrian-Turkish border.
          3. demo
            demo 11 February 2016 20: 24
            +5
            Ie it is necessary to definitely shy around the United States, in a preventive manner.
            That there was no 3rd world.
          4. just exp
            just exp 11 February 2016 20: 34
            +5
            and here I am sitting and thinking, and if they really invade. ours will get involved in the war or not.
            and you can’t surrender Syria, and we won’t drag out a global war.
            1. Finntroll
              Finntroll 11 February 2016 21: 22
              17
              And who will pull the global war? USA? NATO? NATO + USA ?? No one will pull a global war, because a global war is 100% nuclear armageddian. Another thing is that in the West, after the collapse of the USSR, they completely lost their fear, they were so demolished the tower for joy that they completely lost touch with reality. In order to somehow cool off especially violent heads in our country (to our great honor, our "heads" do not live in the headquarters and the government, but on the Internet so far) and they (by the way, everything is the other way around, and this is really scary, in the power of all sorts of imbits, who believed in their exclusivity and impunity, so much has bred that hair moves even in the most indecent places) So that's what I need, I ought to collect all these heads together, bring them to Novaya Zemlya, plant them in the front rows, better in the trenches (at a relatively safe distance, but so that all the delights of the performance would be felt on oneself by 146%) and shy off 300-400 kilotons for clarity. And then show on a piece of paper the total "megatonnage" of our and American arsenals, and ask, WHO NEEDS IT? I am more than sure that there will be a bunch of political solutions, a bunch of political problems and more.
              1. alexmach
                alexmach 11 February 2016 23: 57
                +3
                God knows him, on the one hand, until the nose is given, they will not calm down. On the other hand, it is easy to slide into a full-blown conflict. And our forces are so unequal that there are not many ways out of a large-scale conflict.
            2. Foxmara
              Foxmara 12 February 2016 17: 24
              0
              Quote: just explo
              and global war we will not pull.

              I would not want to look like a jingoistic patriot, but

              Europe is unable to cope with 2 million refugees!
              Europe has been scared by Russians for decades
              Europe may remember at least something about how we fight. And to those who forgot, we just showed. We may not have enough calibers for all purposes, yes ... but there will be enough nuclear weapons. NOBODY wants to die there first. All hope for Navalny and Maidan. Maybe it’s enough to play the Democrats and clean out the column of lords?
              In the event of a war, there is a high probability that there will be a mass of miscarriages THERE, yelling "Russians are coming".
              GDP has no options to give up. Like all of us. Either with a shield, or on a shield. Therefore, the beat will be painful, but carefully. As far as possible.
          5. Oleg Lavrov
            Oleg Lavrov 11 February 2016 20: 36
            +6
            This is already clear! Stupidly Erdogan has driven himself into a trap! Now, give the back and do not enter Syria, they will bite their own ... but if you enter. Russia will blow so that the feathers will fly! And the Anglo-Saxons will watch from across the ocean, as they used to! They don't give a damn about the Turkobes !! They will wait for exhaustion in the war between Russia and Turkey, and then their favorite slogan .. "divide, play and rule" .. Erdogan, fell into the trap of his own "partners" in NATO
        2. Bird the Talker
          Bird the Talker 11 February 2016 19: 18
          +7
          it was the same last time, the Saudis sponsored the Mujahideen no less.
        3. sir.jonn
          sir.jonn 11 February 2016 20: 03
          +2
          Quote: Baikonur
          EPRST! is it true that Afghanistan-2 will be in Syria ?! That was the USSR - the USA, and now Russia - the USA + coalition + Saudis + ...! Already the USA will have a part (part) of responsibility for this! Exactly what is needed! Technically!
          God forbid!

          For the Saudis and the coalition there will be an analogue of Afghanistan or the Ukrainian anti-terrorist operation, and for us, the development of tactics of sabotage warfare with an enemy armed with modern equipment, mainly NATO standards. They will not dare to touch our strongholds, but we will easily do it with our hands.
        4. Asadullah
          Asadullah 11 February 2016 20: 28
          +2
          EPRST! really afghan-2


          Here is the case, Russia would not help Assad alone, an unbearable burden for a country that has just begun to recover. There were agreements with Iran, Iraq and the PRC. From that question, who will fight "meat". The fact that there will be our losses, no doubt, they already exist, but that's why the war is, it does not feed on logs like fire, it needs lives. The main thing is that there will be few losses, given the specifics. Another question is, why the hell are the Saudis getting there? And they climb there to stake out territories of influence. The Turks will immediately follow the Saudis. Probably the beginning of Derbal Syria.
          1. 34 region
            34 region 11 February 2016 22: 47
            +2
            Asadullah! 20.28. Derbalovo of Syria? And why? Why are you so hooked on Syria? Why did Russia get in there? Step in? So we have a lot of conflicts around the world and we are not going anywhere. Maybe the matter is in energy resources? Having chopped off the oil-bearing region, one can become a monopolist of energy resources. If the United States chop off this region, then they will squeeze Russia on the energy supply market. Where will they ship? Yes to Europe. The threat of supply of liquefied natural gas and shale gas production dampened the appetites of our companies. Apparently that's why we entered Syria. In order not to stay with nothing. Although before that calmly looked at the death of Iraq and Libya. And as Medvedev said: They did it consciously (about Libya).
            1. Was mammoth
              Was mammoth 11 February 2016 23: 12
              +2
              Quote: Region 34
              If the United States chop off this region, then they will squeeze Russia on the energy supply market. Where will they ship? Yes to Europe.

              "Iran will sell oil to Europe at $ 1,25 cheaper than Saudi Arabia." Iran intends to keep low prices until it gains a stable market share. The country is trying to greatly increase supplies to the international market in a short time, "the general said Qamar Energy Director Robin Mills. "
              https://rns.online/energy/Iran-budet-prodavat-neft-v-Evropu-po-125-za-barrel-201
              6-02-11 /? 8743874
              Still, it's not just about oil wink
            2. Asadullah
              Asadullah 11 February 2016 23: 25
              +6
              Asadullah! 20.28. Derbalovo of Syria? And why? Why are you so hooked on Syria? Why did Russia get in there? Step in? So we have a lot of conflicts around the world and we are not going anywhere. Maybe the matter is in energy resources? Having chopped off the oil-bearing region, one can become a monopolist of energy resources. If the United States chop off this region, then they will squeeze Russia on the energy supply market. Where will they ship? Yes to Europe. The threat of supply of liquefied natural gas and shale gas production dampened the appetites of our companies. Apparently that's why we entered Syria. In order not to stay with nothing. Although before that calmly looked at the death of Iraq and Libya. And as Medvedev said: They did it consciously (about Libya).


              Some set of questions. The first is gas. We can see how quickly Americans can persuade Arabs to lower the price of oil. Same thing with gas. The Arab gas pipeline to Europe will put the gas industry in Russia in a very difficult position. You might think, well, to hell with it, but, according to my calculations, Russia needs another twenty years of hydrocarbon export policy. It was the policy of containing Russia and fastening it to the American convoy of economics that unleashed the war in Syria. The second question is the presence of Russia in the Mediterranean. Syria, the only way to have this presence. As an end result, the impact on global trade in hydrocarbons. That is, Russia in Syria is the strengthening of Russia in spite of the actions of the United States. The victory in Syria, this is the refusal of the US from a policy of deterrence by radical methods, will switch to softer tactics. But we need to buy time. Ten years, and half the work is done, then everything will go easier every year.
            3. The comment was deleted.
      2. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 11 February 2016 19: 12
        14
        When this miracle in pajamas, with a face similar to the artist Oleg Menshikov (sorry Oleg), blurted out that the "brave" Saudi warriors would go to smash Syria exactly at the time set by the Yankees, laughter was heard from neighboring Yemen, turning into wild neighing! To use you poor, goodbye! am
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 11 February 2016 19: 22
          +9
          Quote: Major Yurik
          blurted out that the "brave" Saudi soldiers would go to smash Syria

          ... only a war can start a war on two fronts ... Saudit ... but Iran will be especially glad about this ... hi
          1. cap
            cap 11 February 2016 19: 58
            +2
            Quote: Inok10
            Quote: Major Yurik
            blurted out that the "brave" Saudi soldiers would go to smash Syria

            ... only a war can start a war on two fronts ... Saudit ... but Iran will be especially glad about this ... hi


            Look at a stoned golfer. What can he really decide? Unless you push him into a hookah. The states said mongrel barked.
        2. Asadullah
          Asadullah 11 February 2016 20: 35
          10
          When it's a miracle in pajamas, with a face like an artist ....


          You are in vain, Major. Adele al-Jubair, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the SA, formerly Saudi ambassador to the United States. (!) Relative of the royal family, the architect of all politics in BV. A very influential person, smart, well educated. Will be hanged one of the first.
        3. Roman 57 rus
          Roman 57 rus 11 February 2016 22: 18
          0
          So I think that with material support, the Syrian army will be the most combat-ready in the region.
      3. tol100v
        tol100v 11 February 2016 19: 17
        0
        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        Obviously not just like that!

        If this were so, then S.K.Shoigu would hardly have spoken about it!
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 11 February 2016 18: 53
      13
      Quote: SAM 5
      Prepare replenishment for IDISH.

      Preparing a replenishment for the Gardens of Eden. Meet, wonderful gurus, the next "faithful warriors of Allah"! Now from Saudi Arabia - handsome military men, in NATO camouflage. Not like the bearded, stinking barmaley in slippers.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 11 February 2016 18: 55
      +4
      This means that the Syrian army must act symmetrically. Go to Saudi Arabia, because of the likelihood of finding Daesh accomplices there.

      1. Foxmara
        Foxmara 11 February 2016 19: 10
        +3
        THAN?? She has not yet recaptured her territory. Iran would gladly go there. But he does not have a common border, so so far the Houthis are beating the Saudis there and so far they are beating them successfully. Iran can also plant weapons on them, thereby complicating the front. Also, the houseites can block the "faucet" of oil transportation, if I'm not mistaken. True - it will be a red rag for the United States.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 11 February 2016 19: 32
          +7
          Quote: Foxmara
          THAN?? She has not yet recaptured her territory. Iran would love to go there. But he doesn’t have a common border, so while the Howsites are beating the Saudis there and so far have been successfully beaten. Iran could also throw up arms, thereby complicating the front .....

          That's just Iran, a week ago, voiced its intention to return the Saudi special forces to their homeland in coffins if they land in Syria. Despite the lack of a common border, the fighters of the Iranian Islamic revolution today are fighting in Syria.
      2. ksv1973
        ksv1973 11 February 2016 19: 21
        +3
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        This means that the Syrian army must act symmetrically. Go to Saudi Arabia, because of the likelihood of finding Daesh accomplices there.

        The Saudis can "enter" Syria through Turkey (as most likely it will) or through Jordan (the latter will not want to quarrel with Riyadh). And HOW can Syria "enter" Saudi Arabia? AS? what
        1. Asadullah
          Asadullah 11 February 2016 20: 42
          +1
          The Saudis can "enter" Syria through ...


          The Saudis are already in Iraq. This is most likely about the northeast (east) of Syria. Chain of cities in the Jazeera desert. To create a territory outside of Assad’s control there, and later proclaim the state. It is even possible to part of Iraq to prevent the territorial rapprochement of Syria with Iran. This is just the beginning.
    4. Deniska999
      Deniska999 11 February 2016 18: 56
      12
      They will divide Syria. Readers' comments on "and we will hit them" are surprising. Do you really think that we will fight them? Divide the banal Syria into zones of influence and nothing more.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 11 February 2016 19: 02
        +5
        Saudi Ministry of Defense announced the process of coordinating the start of a ground operation in Syria with the American coalition

        How much talk can you do?
        Learn from Russia: we first coordinated our actions with Iran, Iraq and Syria, and then announced that we were already in Syria. yes
      2. Kent0001
        Kent0001 11 February 2016 19: 14
        +6
        The main thing is that the gas pipeline from Qatar to Geyropa would not be built.
    5. Tatyana
      Tatyana 11 February 2016 19: 02
      +1
      SAM 5
      Prepare replenishment for ISIS

      Most likely, they themselves will engage in the "dirty" work of occupying the oil regions in Syria. ISIS are demoralized and deserting almost everywhere, especially near Aleppo.
      1. marna
        marna 11 February 2016 19: 19
        +1
        Saudi special forces may appear in Syria to work together with representatives of the American coalition to “counter terrorist groups.”

        Nobody wants to get into this heat without the Americans. The Americans got in on the most unwillingness. This is what is read to "be friends" at the same time with everyone.
      2. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 11 February 2016 19: 28
        +1
        I'm wondering where this coalition is going to move to the territory occupied by ISIS? Hardly. Rather towards Aleppo, to defend our "moderates". If so, this will mean one of two things: either the Western coalition recognizes that Aleppo is now captured by terrorists, who need to be destroyed along with ISIS, which we actually do, or they confirm that the real goal of the ground operation will not be to fight ISIS, but interference in the internal affairs of Syria and military support for one of the political forces.
        1. Realist1989
          Realist1989 11 February 2016 19: 49
          +3
          It is to the territory occupied by ISIS that they must move first. The territory of the "moderates" is not large, and even so it is controlled. And ISIS and the war against them are an ideal argument for bringing troops into Syria without asking the opinion of the official regime. The Western coalition needs to occupy as much territory as possible - in order to establish its own "moderate" regime there and expand its influence (the territory of ISIS is suitable for this). If someone else thinks that the coalition troops are afraid of ISIS, don't be ridiculous, these spooks are no different from others and when a normal modern army appears on the horizon, they will instantly disperse in all directions.
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 11 February 2016 20: 08
            0
            Quote: Realist1989
            these dushmans are no different from others, and when a normal modern army appears on the horizon, someone will disperse instantly.

            I will say more - they will easily join the ranks of the "moderate" regime! And the Americans really need them! They have to pay much less than their own!
            1. Realist1989
              Realist1989 11 February 2016 22: 23
              0
              Yes, it’s also true, the circulation of people in these groups is constant, the field commanders move from group to group, depending on where it is situationally more vivid and safer.
    6. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 11 February 2016 19: 09
      +1
      Do not! Try to graze, there is still left. Not so Yankees are stupid. They are very attentive. Oh, they are. they’ll definitely not climb. They lost time, And the Syrians have already announced. Come receive. Indeed they will receive. Too mntgo have inherited there. Lask will definitely not. No one dares to go there too hot. And the demarches and pressure on us and Syria will be. We will survive worse.
    7. GSH-18
      GSH-18 11 February 2016 20: 04
      0
      Saudi Ministry of Defense announced the process of coordinating the start of a ground operation in Syria with the American coalition

      This shocking behavior strikes me. I’m embarrassed to ask, did someone call them there? Or do they have a UN Security Council mandate ?? Syrian forces have every right to attack these uninvited guests!
    8. Oleg Lavrov
      Oleg Lavrov 11 February 2016 20: 31
      0
      Precisely, in the form of coffins, covered with "stars and stripes" !!
    9. KAV
      KAV 11 February 2016 20: 45
      +4
      Ahmed Asiri said that the ground operation of the Saudi special forces in Syria will begin after Riyadh coordinates its actions with representatives of the American coalition
      How wonderful. Do we already have that, does the coalition own Syria? Those. the Syrian government doesn’t even need to be warned, not just asking for his permission? This is wonderful ... How much they have already been told in plain text - you are operating OUTSIDE international law! No ... as if they don’t even hear. Complete ignore.
      Well, as if I didn’t want, but apparently, nevertheless, we can’t avoid the big badabum ... :( They themselves are getting into trouble ... And then, if it starts, it will be far from a la Ukraine and Donbass. Here there will be much more blood and destruction ... :( Here zhezh greedy his ** chi !!!
    10. Hello
      Hello 11 February 2016 21: 23
      +3
      Quote: SAM 5
      YIDDISH

      Who hurts wink
    11. 222222
      222222 11 February 2016 22: 59
      0
      They understand that things are coming to an end ... and they need to somehow stake out the territories belonging to Syria, so that later all the same
      nye "pipes for gas and oil from the Middle East to Europe
    12. Dreiko11
      Dreiko11 12 February 2016 02: 51
      0
      the seizure of foreign territory is now called so, with a show-off there is a struggle with the IS and they themselves settle on the territory there and remain?
    13. rubidiy
      rubidiy 12 February 2016 03: 53
      +1
      Prepare replenishment for IDISH.

      can be more detailed about IDISH. laughing
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 12 February 2016 04: 06
        0
        Quote: rubidiy
        can be more detailed about YIDISH

        Crossed ISIS and Daesh, IMHO.

        But it turned out really cool laughing
    14. kodxnumx
      kodxnumx 12 February 2016 05: 12
      0
      Quote: SAM 5
      Prepare replenishment for IDISH.

      These cameleers from their gratuitous money completely lost the scent, they were so scented by the special forces, so to speak, that they are unlikely to return home!
  2. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING 11 February 2016 18: 49
    +5
    ... now also to bomb them ... damn it, the Saudis do not help, but only throw up work ... well, okay, at least Iskander has a reason to try.
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 11 February 2016 18: 56
      +4
      Quote: AGAIN
      now also bomb them ...
      Yes, it would be good to bomb their airfields. They will not only come in by infantry, but will also support it from the air. But it’s impossible to bomb. And in Syria it’s getting crowded. ... And in the air and on the earth ... (c).
  3. KBR109
    KBR109 11 February 2016 18: 51
    23
    Dear, why are we rating the article rating? We chop heads to the bad messenger? negative After all, it is written short and clear. Clear and accessible syllable. Thanks to the author that we now know this. Although the news is certainly bad.
    1. hartlend
      hartlend 11 February 2016 19: 01
      +3
      I wrote about the same in the comments to other articles, they are still minus if I don’t like the news.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 11 February 2016 19: 45
        +3
        I always thank the authors for the news, even if it is unpleasant for the Russians. I always put + if the article is well written and the problem is clearly and clearly formulated.
        And minus those who do not understand the very meaning of obtaining TRUE information. For forewarned is forearmed!
        These minusers fool prefer to see the world exclusively in "pink" glasses. Their brains are smooth - without convolutions - that's why it's stupid and "crap" on the forum. No matter how you tell them, everything is useless.
    2. Stanislas
      Stanislas 11 February 2016 19: 07
      +7
      Quote: KBR109
      We chop heads to the bad messenger?
      Maybe you need to have two or three ratings under the article? A micropros. Offhand: Is the topic interesting? (+ 0-) Do you agree with the position of the author? (+ 0-) What is the relationship caused by the events reported in the article? (+ 0-) Maybe the admins get something for themselves from those ratings that are, but I want more ...
      1. ty60
        ty60 11 February 2016 19: 49
        +2
        I would slightly change the arrangement of your criteria. 1-TOPIC 2-ATTITUDE TO EVENTS. 3-ATTITUDE TO AUTHOR'S POSITION. In the following comments, it will be easier to evaluate the commentator's level a priori. And his opinion about the article.
  4. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 11 February 2016 18: 53
    +4
    Interestingly, the time will come when, if we do not declare with might and main, then at least hint that all this fuss of the so-called "coalition" led by the United States, to put it mildly from the point of view of world law, is illegal and can raise a lot of questions? repeat
    And the slaves have already put things in order at their "workplace" where our pilots work. soldier And then everyone is hanging around for no reason under far-fetched pretexts negative
  5. Mercenary
    Mercenary 11 February 2016 18: 53
    +5
    Saudis, did anyone ask you about this? You yourself dig a grave for everyone, dragons against yourself with Iran almost a war, and that you do not live in their wealth and prosperity.
    Brains swam with fat?
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 11 February 2016 19: 03
      0
      And Iran is also an ally of Syria, so there will be a war!
  6. AlexTires
    AlexTires 11 February 2016 18: 54
    +1
    Bedouins revived ...
    1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 11 February 2016 19: 04
      0
      aha, they brought water! laughing
      1. Dam
        Dam 11 February 2016 19: 24
        0
        Have you brought fresh grass?
  7. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 11 February 2016 18: 57
    +1
    Morons .. The coalition must make a decision Saudis in the first eds do not want to go ah
  8. Altona
    Altona 11 February 2016 18: 58
    +6
    The Saudis could actually bring ground forces into Yemen. What hindered? They have such soldiers that they jump out of a newfangled tank at the sight of a somewhat serious enemy, pairs of enemy soldiers with an anti-tank ATGM device or a rocket launcher, for example. And in Syria and Iraq, they only need to be ordered to remove the DAISH-IS banners and raise the Saudi flags. These are their soldiers.
  9. Andrea
    Andrea 11 February 2016 19: 00
    +3
    A lot of popcorn and a comfortable sofa. We will watch with enthusiasm how they will drive the Saudis through the desert.
    The Syrian army has been fighting for 4 years. During this time, they’ll make an excellent warrior from any dunce, and the Saudis have already rolled balls of honey in their pockets in Yemen.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 11 February 2016 19: 06
      +4
      There, at every step, gouging and sending machine guns to frontal attacks. Successful operations take place in those areas where the Hezes, Persians and white advisers at headquarters operate.

      In Guta, then 250 people were sent to death, in a frontal attack on positions controlled by the Baboons for about a year - about 60 people were surrounded.


      Here are the remains in the environment:
      https://www.facebook.com/601615093274280/videos/672848132817642/

      Field medicine under fire:
      https://www.facebook.com/601615093274280/videos/672865229482599/

      This is the army team by the way, and not the NDF and volunteers.
    2. AlexTires
      AlexTires 11 February 2016 19: 27
      +2
      Quote: Andrea
      , and the Saudis have already rolled balls in honey pockets in Yemen.

      the Saudis in Yemen barely dodge pissed rags, what kind of Syria are they ...
  10. Hooks
    Hooks 11 February 2016 19: 00
    12
    That's because State Department litter! Work out as they can, in this case by mouth.
  11. hartlend
    hartlend 11 February 2016 19: 06
    +3
    The Americans are just waiting for this, that Russia entered the war on several fronts. And then Obama comes out to the cake section, all in white. I hope our politicians are more far-sighted than most commentators here.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 11 February 2016 21: 42
      +1
      Your politicians really turned out to be more far-sighted, they prescribed in the defense doctrine that the "exceptional" would get the most out of it in any scenario. Something like this, in short.
  12. Delink
    Delink 11 February 2016 19: 11
    +1
    Nothing to those who were born standing!
    Brains completely bent off.
    It’s time to create a table, how many boxes will start to be sent home.
  13. gergi
    gergi 11 February 2016 19: 14
    +1
    Will fall under the beater. And why not climb where they did not call. They pile them in full.
  14. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 11 February 2016 19: 15
    +1
    "Adel al-Jubeir announced that Saudi special forces may appear in Syria"

    Why are they procrastinating. ISIS meat ends.
  15. novobranets
    novobranets 11 February 2016 19: 15
    0
    Today, the adviser to the Minister of Defense of Saudi Arabia, Ahmed Asiri, said that the ground operation of the Saudi special forces in Syria will begin after Riyadh will coordinate its actions with representatives of the American coalition.
    Absolutely fucked up. Who are these Ami, the masters of Syria? If agreed, then with the legitimate government of Assad, but not with their Abominable Exclusions. It’s time to drive the Merikos off with pissed rags from Syria, from these scoundrels more harm than help.
    1. ty60
      ty60 11 February 2016 19: 55
      0
      It’s time to bring down a couple of coalition attack aircraft. Starting from Turkey. Thank Caliber airfields based.
  16. BOB044
    BOB044 11 February 2016 19: 23
    +1
    How to enter and run. The Syrians said that they would send them all in their coffins.
  17. Fonmeg
    Fonmeg 11 February 2016 19: 27
    +3
    The entry of Saudi troops into the territory of a sovereign state without coordination with the legitimate authority of Syria is, according to international laws, a direct aggression with all the ensuing consequences for the aggressor! They will be destroyed as accomplices of ISIS with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces. They need it ?!
  18. Realist1989
    Realist1989 11 February 2016 19: 28
    12
    The only way to secure at least some chance of participating in the political future of Syria is to keep a specific territory. The Western coalition understands that the only real force besides ISIS in Syria is the SAR army, and that if you pull for a long time, they will simply lose all of Syria and pushing their protégés into the country's leadership will be unrealistic. Therefore, the only way for the US coalition is to start its invasion (naturally under the banner of fighting ISIS) and stake out territory that is not yet occupied by the SAR army. Nobody is going to fight with the army of the SAR (hence with Russia), the main thing for them is to manage to occupy the territory and establish an oppositional Assad regime on it. But then a big bargaining will begin - who will create what kind of coalition government, who will leave when, on what conditions, etc. At the moment, you just have to wait for the partition of the country into occupation zones, as in the good old days after the First World War.
  19. awg75
    awg75 11 February 2016 19: 31
    +2
    why minus the article then ?? !!! it's like spitting on a mirror! but about the Arabs, it's like in life: there is a bunch of gopniks, and there is a very younger brother of a gopnik .... the baby bully and "WHAT HERE OFFENED THE BABY" ??? and away we go .... personally, I think that soon there will be a very, very big war
  20. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 11 February 2016 19: 39
    +3
    The situation is interesting because ours, at least theoretically own the sky of Syria. A ground operation in our time is impossible without the support of aviation and, on the contrary, is meaningless if our and / or Syrians immediately begin to level these troops with the ground using airplanes. Hence the question - how do these muddy guys in white hoodies see this for themselves? Fell our air defense system? This kind of pumping will begin ... On a quiet one to seep into Syria, and then announce it? Firstly, our and Syrian intelligence, and secondly, they will begin to level off with the earth a little later, but they will start anyway, be sure .. What thoughts?
    1. ochakow703
      ochakow703 11 February 2016 19: 59
      +4
      They will not start. If there was a tough position against their arrival, then the amers were already put in their place. That Assad cannot declare, at least at the UN level, about the unauthorized "arrival of assistants"? Maybe, but he is silent. And our people keep quiet, they are afraid of complications. And they will push their idea, and we will get another hemorrhoid. There is a country, we have more regions, but there is no control. Who, and by what right, bombed hospitals in Aleppo? Maybe the UN allowed it? Or Assad gave the go-ahead to any crooks to bomb the sovereign territory. Vegetable garden! Themselves called themselves right, doing their own thing, and WE, and we will be to blame for all the troubles. And so it will be as long as we chew snot around the corner, but make excuses for what we did not do.
    2. Realist1989
      Realist1989 11 February 2016 20: 06
      +4
      Not all the skies are owned by the RF Aerospace Forces. Since the very appearance of Russian aviation, the sky has been de facto divided into "bombing zones" in order to avoid collisions, so that somewhere they bomb and "control" the Russian Air Force and SAR, and somewhere - the Western coalition. These very zones in fact change with the advance of ground forces - the SAR army on the one hand, and the "moderate" and others like them on the other. With what fright did you get the idea that the Syrians, or even more so the Russian Federation, will suddenly start shooting at the coalition contingents? What for? None of the coalitions is going to openly fight each other, there are no fools there, they will simply divide the country into sectors of responsibility, and then they will begin to bargain.
      1. ochakow703
        ochakow703 12 February 2016 20: 47
        0
        "... they will simply divide the country into sectors of responsibility, and then they will begin to bargain." This is the most unpleasant thing. The conflict is dragging on, resources are melting, "partners" are living up to livestock. We, using such a soft (liberal) scenario, make a lot of trouble that could be merged in one touch. Just once saying to everyone that Syria is our concern and we will resolve it. But this is not, and in the end the master Oland (!) demands to stop WHO. Well, isn’t you insanity?
  21. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 11 February 2016 19: 47
    +1
    It's funny The funny thing is how they talk to those who were not called and whose actions were not authorized.
    Damn, with whom to talk, but to enter one of the Saudi palaces for permanent residence?
    There is a room, internet, food ....
  22. nemec55
    nemec55 11 February 2016 20: 03
    +2
    It turns out that I’ve been able to figure out such an incident from the bell tower about three or four months ago in the form of a coalition of the United States and its satellites. It becomes clear why our offer of a truce is to see that the Syrian army, with the support of our VKS, is heading for an inevitable victory fundamentally does not agree with the desires of the West of America and other mischief. And everything goes on a hike to the big mess that immediately leads to the question OUR READY TO CONFLICT ???? I would like that we were ready and didn’t back down because a step back is a delay of the inevitable. It’s bad that this mess starts far from our borders, where around and around NATO.
  23. Karayakupovo
    Karayakupovo 11 February 2016 20: 19
    0
    Wow. This is how many additional targets will appear for the RF Aerospace Forces. And then, whoever did not hide, we are not to blame. PS. Has anyone invited you to share the "pie" with "bacon"?
  24. STALK1974
    STALK1974 11 February 2016 20: 35
    0
    This muda..m in Yemen a little cheated, so they decided and in Syria still an opis .... fuck, really does not reach! wassat
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. STALK1974
    STALK1974 11 February 2016 20: 45
    +1
    All this is intimidation from the US. It is worth destroying oil wells and they will be poor.
  27. Sly
    Sly 11 February 2016 20: 46
    0
    Quote: Foxmara
    The probability of using nuclear weapons is all higher

    Well, if nuclear weapons are used, then for the cunning and on the territory of Syria itself for the accumulation of this Saudi army and with the permission of the Syrian government itself
  28. STALK1974
    STALK1974 11 February 2016 20: 50
    0
    Duck, the fact of the matter is that at the request of the Syrians it is possible to strike at any adversaries who have invaded the border. The main thing is that they ask.
  29. Bradypodidae
    Bradypodidae 11 February 2016 20: 54
    +3
    Cough somewhere in the Saudi desert, away from the cities a couple of kilotons. After that, it’s popular to explain that the next blow will be for real goals. And that’s all, after that no one goes anywhere. And oil will break all the records for high cost. Yes, whack will be universal. But it’s much cheaper than bringing the matter to the point where the priests are really ready to start a war. Their sixes will be reconciled after that, and real players will understand (I hope) that they have come close to the border beyond which there will be no winner. The real use of nuclear weapons (albeit a demonstration one) helps to cool the hot heads. I think so.
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. bmv04636
    bmv04636 11 February 2016 21: 44
    0
    have you all finished in Yemen? Like Ali won.
  32. From Samara
    From Samara 11 February 2016 21: 47
    +1
    They don’t know how to fight, but they all climb somewhere. Soon Iran will deal with you ...
  33. trantor
    trantor 11 February 2016 21: 52
    -2
    Quote: Foxmara
    Take it higher, Syria in an unsuccessful scenario is the beginning of a world war. Against NATO, if these buggers nevertheless get together, and the USA pushes them especially, it will be difficult for us to stand

    Well, the war has been going on for a long time. But who these animals will be wet in the first place is a big question. No matter how they started with the Americans ... in the short term, not NATO and our opponent. Everything is much more interesting and more terrible - the war begins with civilization, which now lives in some kind of 14XX Hijra (in our opinion, the 15th century), but at the same time it has modern weapons, mobile communications, computers and the Internet. And if the world were ruled by smart, not politicians, you would have long understood that now is not the time for blocs.
    1. Stanislas
      Stanislas 12 February 2016 06: 51
      +1
      Quote: trantor
      war begins with civilization, which now lives in some kind of 14XX
      It is necessary to have a bite.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  34. trantor
    trantor 11 February 2016 22: 03
    0
    Is this a joke? Wahhabis Wahhabis will be wet? I'd like to see this sur.
    1. Bradypodidae
      Bradypodidae 11 February 2016 22: 13
      +2
      This whole land operation is being conceived for only one purpose. To chop off a piece of Syria. It didn’t work out, so at least a part will be taken. As soon as the coalition troops set foot on Syrian land, all these igil and opposition will surrender together. Syria will leave. And what to do about it? To fight? It’s easier to do nuclear broads in the desert. Let them breathe in fresh radiation air, it can settle down.
  35. Belarus
    Belarus 11 February 2016 22: 20
    0
    In this situation, I can not understand only one thing: why all this announcement of the invasion of Syria?Perhaps playing on the nerves? But the Russian Federation to one place these games, which may end badly for the party that will try to unnerve the Russian Federation. It is possible for Syria, but this is also not an option. There is only self-satisfaction of this Arab coalition on the principle: we can do something else.

    The question remains, how and what will happen in Syria when, without a UN mandate, does this exaggerated coalition enter Syria? In principle, I do not believe that there will be at least any confrontation between the Russian Aerospace Forces and these coalition leaders.
    1. Bradypodidae
      Bradypodidae 11 February 2016 22: 31
      0
      1-They announced their intentions and are waiting for a reaction, and it should be, because the statement is serious.
      2-Turkey invade from the north, the Saudis from the southeast, p and ndos with all their show-offs from the air and sea. Occupy the bold piece of Syria without encountering opposition from the igil and opposition. After this, you can fight Assad’s troops and say that it’s not a coalition that is fighting, but the opposition of the Assad regime.
      Do you continue to believe that there will be no confrontation?
  36. mr.grin19z
    mr.grin19z 11 February 2016 22: 27
    -1
    while they decide will the war end
  37. Bijo
    Bijo 11 February 2016 23: 11
    0
    If they start hammering ours in Syria, the Supreme is obliged to use all available means of destruction up to nuclear weapons, we have very limited forces there, they will simply destroy the guys, look at it from the outside and say let them be killed so long as there is no nuclear war - this is not right ... If we use nuclear weapons against the armies of Turkey and the Saudis, I do not think that NATO members will fit in for them. If they fit in, so much the worse for them. Everything is heading for a big war, it's too late to be afraid, as they say, two deaths will not happen .... like Vysotsky's "it's better than from vodka and colds."
  38. tehnokrat
    tehnokrat 11 February 2016 23: 27
    0
    Quote: Foxmara
    Take it higher, Syria in an unsuccessful scenario is the beginning of a world war.

    And this is what I think, colleagues.
    The fact that in a bad situation the probability of a general nuclear war is almost 100% has long been established.
    Why, only financial supergiants need such a deal? For this, they invented tactical nuclear weapons;
    its use is more likely. But a nuclear apocalypse is possible, IMHO, except for the absolute foolishness of stoned m ... daks, moreover, several at once. I hope that all the barriers that block access to the button are arranged correctly.
    The global financial redistribution is coming, as they say, and the butt goes beyond where the border of the spheres of influence of monetary super-bodies will go; "The whole world in ruin" they are unlikely to allow. But the inflated unsecured dollar is doomed, and the owners of the printing press seem to understand this. If the bubble bursts, few will survive. It is not beneficial for anyone to burst: it is not the Rockefellers, nor China, nor even us. It must be blown off carefully, but only to whom then to evaporate excess air? So you have to share the aces: the yuan has already been accepted into reserve currencies, and Iran, for example, intends to conduct oil deals in the yuan.
    The Sauds, it seems, are taking the Pontus, they are looking at the SGA, since they have the word “by agreement” through the word.
    But where are the announced aircraft carriers now? This is really serious!
  39. BARMEN628651
    BARMEN628651 11 February 2016 23: 41
    -1
    The main thing is that Russia be ready for this blow. And overturn all the troops of the invasion.
  40. 8140
    8140 12 February 2016 00: 59
    0
    Great news)
    If they didn’t do this, they had to give them money so that they would come in)))) fools)))
    This event opens such windows of opportunity for Shiites)
  41. The comment was deleted.
  42. Wolka
    Wolka 12 February 2016 05: 36
    0
    these individuals with Krakow calbaskas on their heads are already starting to get bored, well, they’ll try the Russian strongies, and the Yankees were not in vain bombing Aleppo, Kanashenkov correctly noted that the situation was similar to Afghanistan, when the Yankees bombed a hospital there, they swept their lasts, soaked in Aleppo wounded Igilovites, who would definitely be captured and the ATS would have untied their tongues, then it would have been definitely a world scandal ...
  43. Horn
    Horn 12 February 2016 07: 10
    0
    It turns out interesting: 2 of some left-wing countries agree on the date and tactics of the attack on the third country. Do not find it strange? How would Russia, for example, coordinate with China the start of a military operation in Germany ...
  44. Yugan Oleg
    Yugan Oleg 12 February 2016 08: 50
    0
    In fact, this was to be expected, I hope for the activation of the Yemeni resistance to the Saudi acupants.
  45. was-witek
    was-witek 12 February 2016 10: 53
    0
    What is this kid ??? I'm afraid toilet paper is not enough at the sight of our paratroopers !!!!