Military Review

Reuters: Syrian opposition forces ask for anti-aircraft systems

81
Syrian opposition asks allies to provide them with anti-aircraft weapon to protect against the bombing of civilians, transmits RIA News message from Reuters.




“If we (the anti-aircraft complexes) were here, this would solve the problems in Syria,” said the representative of the delegation of oppositionists Salim al-Muslat. “Anti-aircraft weapons will help protect civilians from air strikes, including Russian ones.”

According to him, "the opposition can guarantee that the weapon will not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."

Recall, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has repeatedly stressed that the aircraft of the VKS in Syria cause only “pinpoint strikes and only on the objects of the IG grouping after conducting aerial reconnaissance and multiple clarification of data obtained from different sources.”
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cniza
    cniza 11 February 2016 08: 58 New
    61
    According to him, "the opposition can guarantee that the weapon will not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."



    Did he even understand what he said?
    1. Cormorants
      Cormorants 11 February 2016 09: 00 New
      11
      Haha, give them a drip stick.
      1. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 11 February 2016 09: 03 New
        33
        send them plastic coffins, not anti-aircraft guns ... a good terrorist, a dead terrorist ...
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 11 February 2016 09: 07 New
          +6
          Meanwhile, Russia comes out with a new initiative: "The proposals will be presented today at the meeting of the International Syrian Support Group in Munich.
          Russia is proposing a ceasefire in the Syrian Arab Republic from March 1, Reuters reports citing a Western official.
          According to the agency, the parties have not yet reached an agreement on this issue. It is reported that the United States has some doubts on several points of Russia's proposals.
          Officially, Moscow does not disclose the essence of its initiative. Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN Vitaly Churkin said that the proposals will be presented today at a meeting of the International Syria Support Group in Munich.
          At the same time, US State Department spokesman Mark Toner said that Washington does not know specific dates for Moscow's possible ceasefire proposal in Syria. "I think our preference would be an immediate ceasefire," Toner said.
          Read on: http://izvestia.ru/news/603891#ixzz3zpwO2cLj
          1. aleks 62 next
            aleks 62 next 11 February 2016 09: 21 New
            26
            ..... Russia proposes to establish a ceasefire in the Syrian Arab Republic from March 1, ...

            ..... request ..... Shaw ??? .... Again on the same rake ... ????? ..... Donbass did not teach anything ???? ....
            1. Black Colonel
              Black Colonel 11 February 2016 09: 44 New
              +7
              Perhaps they know that before March 1, the bearded will be thinned and then it will be easier to bend your fingers.
              1. Nikolay K
                Nikolay K 11 February 2016 11: 04 New
                +3
                Well done, our diplomats, pulling time. If the Saudis or the Turks decide to send troops, then they will violate the peace process in Syria and turn out to be the aggressor, which they most likely will not dare to. And 1, of course, the fire will not stop, because too fragmented groups are involved in the process.
                1. aleks 62 next
                  aleks 62 next 11 February 2016 11: 37 New
                  +1
                  ...... If the Saudis or the Turks decide to send troops, then they will violate the peace process in Syria and turn out to be the aggressor ....

                  ... The aggressor there are others .... Fresh infa: ".... The Russian Ministry of Defense has accused the United States of bombing the Syrian city of Aleppo, Interfax reports a message from the representative of the military department Igor Konashenkov.

                  “Yesterday at 13:55 Moscow time, two US Air Force A-10 attack aircraft entered the Syrian sky on the shortest course from Turkey on the shortest course directly to Aleppo and fully worked on objects in the city,” he said. “..... Link: https://slon.ru/posts/63793
              2. Michael-rl
                Michael-rl 11 February 2016 11: 38 New
                0
                The phrase "about a ceasefire between the opposing groups" slipped through. It is unlikely that daesh is included in the list of these "groupings".
            2. Eragon
              Eragon 11 February 2016 09: 59 New
              +7
              Quote: aleks 62 next
              ..... Russia proposes to establish a ceasefire in the Syrian Arab Republic from March 1, ...

              ..... request ..... Shaw ??? .... Again on the same rake ... ????? ..... Donbass did not teach anything ???? ....

              Weather ... Until mid-May the weather will be mostly non-flying. Why not "make peace" for this time?
            3. Eragon
              Eragon 11 February 2016 09: 59 New
              0
              Quote: aleks 62 next
              ..... Russia proposes to establish a ceasefire in the Syrian Arab Republic from March 1, ...

              ..... request ..... Shaw ??? .... Again on the same rake ... ????? ..... Donbass did not teach anything ???? ....

              Weather ... Until mid-May the weather will be mostly non-flying. Why not "make peace" for this time?
            4. marna
              marna 11 February 2016 12: 00 New
              0
              Quote: aleks 62 next
              ..... Russia proposes to establish a ceasefire in the Syrian Arab Republic from March 1, ...

              ..... ..... Shaw ??? .... Again on the same rake ... ????? ..... Donbass did not teach anything ???? ....

              Maybe they want to see how the Turks behave when the fire ceases ... If they don’t observe a ceasefire, then with a clear conscience on them ... The situation in the BV is now a dead end, it is necessary to force all the masks to be dropped there.
          2. da Vinci
            da Vinci 11 February 2016 10: 23 New
            0
            "Moscow does not officially disclose the essence of its initiative" But why? If something practical, you can open at least some details. Here "democratic" countries will promote the smallest move so that it is expensive to watch / listen. As a result, any of their steps, sometimes multi-move and sneaky, is hidden behind a beautiful wrapper, and Russia has to prove and prove its case. hi
            1. Kite
              Kite 11 February 2016 12: 13 New
              +1
              Quote: da Vinci
              But why?

              .... US State Department spokesman Mark Toner said that Washington does not know the specific dates of a possible proposal from Moscow .....

              - because when they have nothing to say, they turn on the psak, they say they don’t know, they haven’t heard, they haven’t seen.
        2. DIVAN SOLDIER
          DIVAN SOLDIER 11 February 2016 09: 11 New
          +8
          By the way, what the American special forces are doing there! Do they happen to be engaged in the training of new anti-aircraft gunners?
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 11 February 2016 09: 17 New
            +2
            Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
            By the way, what the American special forces are doing there! Do they happen to be engaged in the training of new anti-aircraft gunners?

            They are easier to train somewhere, for example, in Turkey, and then delivered to Syria with the complex. But you still need to watch them, otherwise they will bring down something good that is not the plane.
          2. forest park 86
            forest park 86 11 February 2016 10: 24 New
            0
            Most likely, they have already been trained, and now they are preparing a more or less legal basis for the transfer of ISIS
      2. ltc22A
        ltc22A 11 February 2016 10: 44 New
        0
        From a dead donkey ears!
        O. Bender
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Kent0001
      Kent0001 11 February 2016 09: 19 New
      +3
      What they ordered, he said so.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 11 February 2016 09: 37 New
      11
      Bearded "oppositionists" from all sorts of ISIS and other evil spirits ask their owners to provide anti-aircraft weapons, and after all, the Anglo-Saxon ghouls can provide, through the same Saud or Turks.
    5. Samen
      Samen 11 February 2016 09: 49 New
      +5
      "The opposition can guarantee that weapons do not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."
      Very interesting: HOW will they be "observed"? Will the observers sit on the batteries? Shchazzz ... What Anglo-Saxon would voluntarily climb under the bombs? "D., B." (C)
    6. yushch
      yushch 11 February 2016 10: 02 New
      +1
      Reuters, such Reuters ... Only the most stubborn and stupid people trust this resource. Russian representatives have repeatedly stated that strikes are carried out on objects only after careful verification of information about them, and the fact that strikes are only EXCLUSIVELY on the IS is frank ... fool
    7. lysyj bob
      lysyj bob 11 February 2016 10: 03 New
      +3
      Quote: cniza
      Did he even understand what he said?


      He understood everything. He clearly passed his curators. The weapons will be under their (curators ') control, which means that it is supposed to be used only on our and Syrian planes with their (curators') knowledge. Whether the states will follow these requests or not is the question. If they behave and provide "means", then immediately provocations will begin on our planes from densely populated areas - to the fortuneteller on the go. The videoconferencing will have more problems. If not, there may be hysteria on the part of the "moderate" in Erdogan's style: "you are with us, or against the terrorists."
    8. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 11 February 2016 11: 06 New
      +1
      No, well, absolutely dead! So guys, where is my nuclear, nuclear say, who-thread saw where I was doing my rocket? laughing
    9. your1970
      your1970 11 February 2016 12: 31 New
      +1
      He said (if you expand the sentence into human language):
      "The units of the Syrian opposition are / will be divisions Europeans or Americans sufficient numbersto exclude theft / squeezing of anti-aircraft weapons. In addition, this weapon will be used exclusively for aviation of the Russian Federation-in order to avoid the risk of accidental destruction of the aircraft of the coalition / USA. This will be controlled by the said units of Europeans or Americans. "
      Something like this ...
    10. alexmach
      alexmach 11 February 2016 22: 06 New
      +1
      I think I understand. The positioners themselves with anti-aircraft systems can not cope.
  2. izya top
    izya top 11 February 2016 08: 58 New
    +9
    some javelins ask, others patriots what
    1. cniza
      cniza 11 February 2016 08: 59 New
      11
      Quote: iza top
      some javelins ask, others patriots what


      School one and one teacher.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. evil partisan
      evil partisan 11 February 2016 09: 06 New
      +5
      Quote: izya top
      some javelins ask, others patriots

      Izzy hi . Maybe we are this winked ... "Iron dome" we will give them? Well ... like "Iron" smilesuch as repeat ... Gesheft - as usual: 70 to 30. Is it coming? wink
      Hi, my fellow believer! hi
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 11 February 2016 09: 15 New
        +3
        Quote: Angry Guerrilla
        Izya. Maybe we will get this ... "Iron Dome"? Well ... like "Iron", like pgodadim ... Gesheft - as usual: 70 to 30. Okay?

        I share !!! amI also have some "iron dome"! smileso: 30-30-40! yes
        1. izya top
          izya top 11 February 2016 09: 21 New
          +2
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          I share !!!

          Tady enterprise becomes unprofitable request
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 11 February 2016 09: 26 New
            0
            Quote: izya top
            Tady enterprise becomes unprofitable

            then you are not participating! am
            1. izya top
              izya top 11 February 2016 09: 29 New
              +1
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              then you are not participating!

              you don’t hand over your banks, get out yourself tongue
              1. Andrey Yuryevich
                Andrey Yuryevich 11 February 2016 09: 37 New
                0
                Quote: iza top
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                then you are not participating!

                you don’t hand over your banks, get out yourself tongue

                Izya, you hurt me! belay
        2. evil partisan
          evil partisan 11 February 2016 09: 35 New
          0
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          I share !!!

          stopSchazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. We don’t serve on Thursdays! request
          Hi amateur! drinks
        3. atalef
          atalef 11 February 2016 09: 40 New
          +6
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          Quote: Angry Guerrilla
          Izya. Maybe we will get this ... "Iron Dome"? Well ... like "Iron", like pgodadim ... Gesheft - as usual: 70 to 30. Okay?

          I share !!! amI also have some "iron dome"! smileso: 30-30-40! yes

          We cut tails - I have a monopoly.
          1. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 11 February 2016 10: 03 New
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            We cut tails - I have a monopoly.

            "and you are Brutus" ... (c) recourse
      2. izya top
        izya top 11 February 2016 09: 20 New
        +2
        Quote: Angry Guerrilla
        Gesheft - as usual: 70 to 30. Is it coming?

        healthy hi well, if 70 to me, then it goes yes and beer cans for the dome throw wink
  3. activator
    activator 11 February 2016 09: 01 New
    +2
    will help protect civilians from airstrikes, including Russian ones ”
    Gee))) The Western coalition will also be shot down.
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 11 February 2016 10: 36 New
      0
      In Malaysia, are the Boeings still? what
  4. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 11 February 2016 09: 01 New
    +2
    We must offer them fabs, but more
  5. oldseaman1957
    oldseaman1957 11 February 2016 09: 02 New
    +3
    "" Anti-aircraft weapons will help protect civilians from airstrikes, including Russian "" - Arming with anti-aircraft systems of the opposition will be a de facto declaration of war on Russia from Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. I would very much like to hope that they are soberly calculating the consequences of such a step.
  6. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 11 February 2016 09: 02 New
    +6
    They can and give. It is quite possible that all this hysteria with "massive bombing of civilians" was created in order to justify the supply of air defense systems.
  7. saber
    saber 11 February 2016 09: 02 New
    +4
    A population armed with anti-aircraft guns continues to be peaceful ???? belay
    1. your1970
      your1970 11 February 2016 12: 41 New
      +1
      population,anti-aircraft continues to be peaceful ???? belay
      Usually it becomes dead ....
  8. Zeppelin ml.
    Zeppelin ml. 11 February 2016 09: 03 New
    +3
    “If they (anti-aircraft systems) were with us, this would solve the problems in Syria,

    deja vu. I remember one iDiot said that 1200 Jewels will solve the problems of one (ts-ss!) Certain country. Are these idiots done in one piece?
  9. kote119
    kote119 11 February 2016 09: 04 New
    +1
    I won’t be surprised if the tolerant put MANPADS to the bearded men to protect their children, in their spirit
  10. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 09: 04 New
    +4
    According to him, “the opposition can guarantee that the weapon does not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans”
    Yes, I can only imagine how bearded people are sitting behind air defense systems, without education and with a cry of Allah Akbar, they launch a rocket, having previously calculated all the trajectories.
    They will not supply them with air defense, they are afraid that these systems will fall into ours.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 11 February 2016 09: 08 New
      +5
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Yeah

      phrase itself
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      opposition can guarantee that weapons do not fall into the wrong hands

      that looks like "I swear by my mom" is a masterpiece. Only play poker with these guys.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 09: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: Zeppelin ml.

        that looks like "I swear to my mother" is a masterpiece

        You can translate into Russian, as I answer for the bazaar.
        1. Zeppelin ml.
          Zeppelin ml. 11 February 2016 09: 16 New
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          You can translate into Russian, as I answer for the bazaar.

          and, looking into those honest eyes under the balaclava, the West burst into tears from the surging feelings and - poured a batch of GTAMs to the bearded ones with calculations.
    2. ssergn
      ssergn 11 February 2016 09: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      they are afraid that these complexes will fall into ours.



      Alexander, good afternoon. Yes, there is logic in this and what else. But there are also factors: the cost of such weapons is not at all weak, the training of the operators (otherwise civilians will begin to fall again), and anti-radar missiles cannot be written off. Yes, and other means of suppression are available, again, intelligence does not sleep. A pair of complexes do not provide good protection.
    3. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 11 February 2016 09: 28 New
      0
      .... They will not supply them with air defense, they are afraid that these complexes will fall into ours ....

      ... They can deliver ... Melee ..... This is quite enough to drive aviation to altitudes of 10 km or more, where there will be low efficiency .... Only our trophy and after restoration .... From the same Africa, for example, or from the Saudis .... I do not exclude this option .... Modern hardly .... hi
      1. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 11 February 2016 09: 36 New
        0
        Quote: aleks 62 next
        .... They will not supply them with air defense, they are afraid that these complexes will fall into ours ....

        ... can and put ..

        in Afghanistan in the 86th, the stingers did appear ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 09: 47 New
          0
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          in Afghanistan in the 86th, the stingers did appear ...

          MANPADS will not do the weather.
    4. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 11 February 2016 09: 53 New
      +1
      The God-chosen ones will be the first to oppose and take all their efforts and opportunities to prevent the said supplies, because the bearded, by virtue of their mentality and genetic hatred, were not inappropriately flunking ANY Israeli plane. And the more they fill up, the more virgins will wait for them in the world of eternal hunting.
      1. Zeppelin ml.
        Zeppelin ml. 11 February 2016 10: 07 New
        +1
        Quote: Black Colonel
        God's chosen ones will be against

        it is truth too. The GI Air Force was also accused of "the death of civilians", I remember, last December, when they "cleaned up" Samir Kantar in Damascus.
  11. askort154
    askort154 11 February 2016 09: 06 New
    0
    They found an excuse "to protect the civilian population." It won't help, ours work at H = 6 thousand meters, and if
    to supply serious air defense, it will be another war.
    1. Zeppelin ml.
      Zeppelin ml. 11 February 2016 09: 33 New
      0
      Quote: askort154
      what if
      to supply serious air defense, it will be another war.

      namely - "other", you are right. Serious countermeasures will be required, and then the thesis of the GDP about "non-linkage" in Syria will undergo revision. And the whoopers who stink of "second Afghanistan" will have a holiday.
  12. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 11 February 2016 09: 07 New
    0
    To protect the civilian population ... and everyone unanimously believed!
  13. evil partisan
    evil partisan 11 February 2016 09: 08 New
    0
    Oh, this opposition will be interrogated. They will get on their heads a bunch of heavier and FAB-250/500 ...
  14. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 11 February 2016 09: 08 New
    10
    About how - Geneva we do not want, give us anti-aircraft guns ... what
    Is it too straightforward? Their overseas patrons are put under attack ... After all, the transfer of these weapons to those whom the official authorities (and we, as invited) consider terrorists, will directly show who actually supports terrorism. After all, they asked - let's define who is who - silence ... If we are fighting against a common enemy - DAISH, then why are anti-aircraft systems? They don't have aviation. The question arises - isn't it time to put in place such an "opposition" with the same "coalition"? For example, on their own terms. We are not trying to download their rights to all and sundry. So we will say, like, comrades, we will expel the ISIS members, then we will deal with you, but for now, if you don’t help, then don’t interfere. And if you interfere, you automatically become terrorists. Something like this.
    Well, this is purely my personal opinion repeat
    1. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 11 February 2016 09: 38 New
      +1
      Well now, something like this is happening yes
      1. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 11 February 2016 09: 44 New
        +1
        By the way, yes. The news slipped that V. Churkin refused to make excuses to anyone about the actions of the air forces in Syria. Moreover, we are officially there, and if someone needs to know about the actions of our forces, then see the briefings of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation - everything is clearly indicated and painted there smile
        So we are already starting to put in place "teachers" and "mentors" soldier
  15. Alexez
    Alexez 11 February 2016 09: 11 New
    +6
    Can they ask for nuclear weapons, solely to "protect the civilian population" from any aggression, even alien ...
  16. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 11 February 2016 09: 14 New
    +1
    In addition to MANPADS, it will not be possible to deploy anything quickly, trained calculations are needed. Is it that the payments will also be from the supplier country? So this is a direct declaration of war, "casus whites". Single PUs will not do anything, and deploying a full-fledged network is both money and time - a lot. Taking into account the fact that satellites and UAVs are constantly working, and the agents are probably working, it is unlikely that the mass deployment of even medium-sized missiles is slammed.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. Mercenary
    Mercenary 11 February 2016 09: 19 New
    0
    They need with this proposal to don Pedro, he will sell everything and conscience and honor and homeland. They have already sold experience to Georgia!
  19. Karayakupovo
    Karayakupovo 11 February 2016 09: 20 New
    0
    Well, then you have to "calibrate" the necessary places first. And then what will the "peaceful" bearded men ask for?
    1. salad
      salad 11 February 2016 09: 31 New
      0
      I agree with the calibers to prepare the site laughing
  20. brasist
    brasist 11 February 2016 09: 21 New
    0
    Quote: cniza
    According to him, "the opposition can guarantee that the weapon will not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."



    Did he even understand what he said?

    Well, they stuck well, they didn’t instruct yet what to say request
  21. Humpty
    Humpty 11 February 2016 09: 24 New
    +2
    It seems the bearded condoms are over.
  22. Achilles
    Achilles 11 February 2016 09: 28 New
    +1
    Let them at least give something, the Su-34 will crush it from the beginning, and then destroy it, as it was in Georgia in 2008.
    1. kapitan92
      kapitan92 11 February 2016 09: 59 New
      +6
      That's for sure! The latest anti-radar missile X-2015USHKE (TP) was presented at MAX 58.
      "...... The basic Kh-58USHKE missile is equipped with a solid-fuel engine that provides acceleration to a maximum speed of 4200 km / h. The maximum flight range is 245 km. Probably, the upgraded version of the Kh-58USHKE (TP) rocket has similar flight data. and can hit targets within the same radius.

      The X-58USHKE product is equipped with a combined guidance system with an inertial strapdown navigation system and a wide-range passive radar homing head. According to the developer, such equipment allows this missile to hit the target (a circle with a diameter of 20 m with a working radar in the center) with a probability of 0,8. "......
      A trial in combat would not hurt.
  23. Colleague
    Colleague 11 February 2016 09: 34 New
    0
    Poor bearded scavengers - dying is not a hunt.
  24. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 11 February 2016 09: 36 New
    0
    “If they (anti-aircraft systems) were with us,

    Then you have them right away, and there wouldn’t be ... As they say: Oh, oh, oh, but who can you use it, then it will ..? Naive guys, they suppose, got the air defense system and that's it, they defeated everyone at once ... laughing
  25. afrikanez
    afrikanez 11 February 2016 09: 46 New
    0
    It is somehow strange that they began to call terrorists now. Why more and more often they began to call them apposition. Well, when such an apposition specifically begins to operate in Europe, then let's see what the West will tell us. After all, they play with fire and cannot understand in any way what it leads to. fool
  26. Izotovp
    Izotovp 11 February 2016 09: 54 New
    +1
    Ours are already walking above the zone of destruction of MANPADS, and even higher is it like Buk? But where can they find such specialists among the "civilian population"? Or will the specialists in the kit go under the guise of observers or doctors without borders? Yes, and it is doubtful to hide the transfer and deployment.)))
  27. Alexanast
    Alexanast 11 February 2016 09: 54 New
    +7
    "The opposition can guarantee that weapons do not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."


    What are the wrong hands? Did he mean us? request
    Well then, he’s definitely nothing, that’s completely, to guarantee can not.
    1. wasjasibirjac
      wasjasibirjac 11 February 2016 14: 53 New
      0
      No, not us, they are oppositionists there, such as ISIS enemies, and here they are committed to not giving up ISIS. Well, if only expensive hi
  28. buywol
    buywol 11 February 2016 10: 10 New
    +1
    The same rake as in the Donbass. If in September 2014 there was no Minsk 1, people in the Donbass would have long forgotten what war is in their home, and Donbass was within its borders.
  29. triglav
    triglav 11 February 2016 10: 16 New
    0
    This opposition is the militants. Ours are cooperating with the real opposition.
  30. nrex
    nrex 11 February 2016 10: 18 New
    0
    Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
    By the way, what the American special forces are doing there! Do they happen to be engaged in the training of new anti-aircraft gunners?


    They cry in Iraq, terrible ..... they want to live. They thought they had come to jog in their park and scream little words.
  31. nrex
    nrex 11 February 2016 10: 20 New
    0
    Quote: buywol
    The same rake as in the Donbass. If in September 2014 there was no Minsk 1, people in the Donbass would have long forgotten what war is in their home, and Donbass was within its borders.


    And as part of Russia.
  32. Navy7981
    Navy7981 11 February 2016 10: 30 New
    0
    These "funny" fighters for a "bright future" not for a second without hesitation burned the whole country for the sake of dough and power, and now of course they will make every effort to protect against bombs ... ha ha.
  33. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 11 February 2016 10: 45 New
    0
    from beyond the forest from beyond the mountains showed a man an ax ...............
  34. TOZ-34
    TOZ-34 11 February 2016 10: 46 New
    0
    "The opposition can guarantee that weapons do not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."
    They told the truth. The West gives ISIS an air defense system, and further in the text, excluding the word "opposition".
  35. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 11 February 2016 11: 04 New
    0
    And they will achieve it if in the near future the Syrian (government) army, with our air support, does not well pinch the "oppositionists" and ISIS near Aleppo and Deir Ez-Zor.
  36. Yugan Oleg
    Yugan Oleg 11 February 2016 11: 20 New
    0
    Deliveries of air defense systems is in general a troublesome business. Then they may turn out to be with the Kurds and what good is in Geyrop, I do not think to be afraid. And politically it will look very defiant.
  37. magirus401
    magirus401 11 February 2016 12: 44 New
    0
    And in the photo, is that what they have already delivered the latest air defense systems?
  38. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 11 February 2016 12: 45 New
    +1
    Quote: aleks 62 next
    ...... If the Saudis or the Turks decide to send troops, then they will violate the peace process in Syria and turn out to be the aggressor ....

    ... The aggressor there are others .... Fresh infa: ".... The Russian Ministry of Defense has accused the United States of bombing the Syrian city of Aleppo, Interfax reports a message from the representative of the military department Igor Konashenkov.

    “Yesterday at 13:55 Moscow time, two US Air Force A-10 attack aircraft entered the Syrian sky on the shortest course from Turkey on the shortest course directly to Aleppo and fully worked on objects in the city,” he said. “..... Link: https://slon.ru/posts/63793

    Konashenkov is handsome, he stuck a hairpin in .... the NATO general))) “The first thing that is done is unfounded accusations against us in order to ward off all suspicions. If this goes on, then soon we will have to hold two briefings: first for ourselves, and then for those guys from the coalition who consider themselves to be professionals, ”Konashenkov concluded.
  39. olegkrava
    olegkrava 11 February 2016 17: 30 New
    0
    Quote: cniza
    According to him, "the opposition can guarantee that the weapon will not fall into the wrong hands, as it will be under the supervision of Europeans or Americans."

    Yeah, the Americans and the Europeans will stand by and wait for the FAB 500 to fly into their Bosko.