The scenario of the new Russian-Turkish war, which several years ago might seem like a figment of a sick imagination (although the deep-seated contradictions between the two powers have not disappeared and always existed), is already quite possible. Moreover, the situation is so dangerous that the war can begin at any time. Preparation of the Turkish armed forces for the creation of a “buffer zone” in Syria and high-profile statements by leading Turkish politicians; support for intervention in Syria by Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain; British troop-transfer exercises with commentary on preparations for a conflict with Russia; sudden army exercises and fleet The Russian Federation in the south and south-west strategic direction (there are other "bells and whistles") - all this speaks of the real danger of an escalation of hostilities on the Middle East front of the Fourth World War, which has been going on on the planet since 2014.
Reference. Third world war - this is so-called. “Cold”, information war 1945-1991, with local military foci in territories that do not belong to the core of the socialist and capitalist bloc. The USSR lost the war with a crash. Moreover, he did not lose at the level of military forces and the economy, but at a conceptual, cultural, informational level, when the top of the Red Empire simply lost all positions, betrayed the Soviet people and got the opportunity to become fabulously rich by plundering the national wealth and entering the lower levels of the hierarchy of the global elite of the New World order Such a defeat and shame Russian civilization did not know for all the millennial history. Without a fight and military defeat (!), Almost all Hitler’s plans to divide our state into buffer, Russophobic, “independent and independent” states were realized. They separated the Baltic states, where they almost never had their own statehood, creating on its territory dwarf Russophobic and neo-Nazi regimes, where millions of Russians overnight became the “second grade”. The Baltic states themselves became a bridgehead for NATO, hanging over the Russian Federation, at once destroying the military-strategic positions that the Russian princes and kings created for a thousand years. They created a “separatist”, hostile to Ukraine, Ukraine, which has now also been turned into a military ram directed against the Russian Federation and a NATO foothold. Kiev - "the mother of Russian cities", the capital of the original, primordial Russia, was in another "state"! They created the "independent" White Russia - another fragment of the Russian civilization, which alone is doomed to spiritual, cultural and socio-economic degradation. Moldova, which is waiting for the absorption of Romania and Romanization. In Transcaucasia, normal relations are preserved only with Armenia. Georgia is an enemy waiting in the wings. And the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh created a non-healing ulcer of war. Central Asia, separated from large Russia, was doomed to archaization, degradation, Islamization, and economic (and then political) expansion of China. This process has so far led to the fact that Central Asia can become one huge “inferno zone” like Afghanistan, Syria — Iraq, Libya, and Somalia. At the same time there is a threat from Japan, which claims to be the Kuriles. China, when implementing negative scenarios for the development of the Russian Federation, will also not abandon the “original Chinese lands” - Siberia. "Reformers-perestroika" in the Russian Federation began to carry out "reforms" according to the recipes of the West, de facto it was a cultural-informational, socio-economic genocide, again according to Hitler's plans. Criminal and sexual revolution were implemented. This eventually led to the extinction of the Russians and other indigenous peoples of Russia. We lost up to 15 million people, and this is without war and only direct losses, indirect losses are much greater. And these “figures”, who honestly can be called “enemies of the people”, still occupy key positions in the financial, socio-economic, educational sectors of the Russian Federation, continuing their wrecking activity. These are just some of the most obvious outcomes of the Third World War.
Almost immediately, the masters of the West began training in the Fourth World War. The goal is the destruction, defragmentation of large national states created following the Second World War, civilization states (Russia, China, India), utilization of the main mass of mankind to drastically reduce consumption and restore the planet’s ecology and creating the New World Order on the ruins of the old world. The non-slave-owning global civilization is the “Babylon” project, where there will be “islands” (including huge ships-liners) of the highest technologies, and immersed in the archaic - primitive communities, neo-feudalism and slavery, the rest of the planet. At the same time, one of the main tasks is to utilize “extra biomass” to 500 million - 1-2 billion people. This should solve the problem of reducing the resource base of mankind, and the restoration of ecology. War, with its gradual escalation, should burn huge masses of people. At the same time, the destruction of the old socio-economic and energy infrastructure in countries where war is going on, examples of Libya, Iraq, Syria, where previously thriving cities and districts are in ruins, will cause even greater losses to the human population than direct hostilities. Destroyed territories simply will not feed those masses of people who live there now. Constant conflicts over the remaining resources, hunger, disease (with the destruction of the medical care system), etc., will kill more people than war.
It is clear that some people will try to escape in the regions and countries of the world that are not yet affected by the war. Hundreds of thousands, millions of people have already fled to Turkey, to the countries of Europe. However, this completely suits the “matrix reset” architects. First, millions of refugees, and there will be even more, will only bring with them various problems (rising crime, drug trafficking, slave trade, a surge of xenophobia, nationalism, etc.) and, as a result, a war to still relatively stable countries. Secondly, still stable countries and large cities will build “walls”, lock themselves off, that is, build “islands of security”, tighten laws, restrict the right to move.
For example, here is the last news on this topic: Israel plans to build a wall around the entire border. This statement was made by the head of the Israeli government Benjamin Netanyahu. “We are preparing a multi-year program to build a security fence along all the country's borders in order to protect ourselves in the Middle East,” said the Prime Minister. According to Netanyahu, we are talking about a program that “costs many billions of shekels, these are expenses for many years.” “Now we are working on a list of priorities to start a gradual construction, but this program will be implemented for the sake of Israel’s security,” the politician said. “In the environment in which we live, we must protect ourselves from predators,” said the Israeli Prime Minister. “In the end, Israel, as I see it, will be surrounded on all sides by a security fence,” he added. Israel has already built walls near the borders with Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, and also with the Gaza Strip. The fence was also erected on a substantial part along the line with the West Bank. In 2015, the construction of the first section of the fence on the border with Jordan started. Thus, we see how security islands are being built before our eyes, separated from the rest of the world. To this leads the policy of the owners of the West.
That is, everything is according to plan - the construction of an "electronic concentration camp" is underway. As a result, it may come to the point that the refugees will simply be shot at the border, they will drown their ships, and they will mine the corridors along the movement of people. Tolerance, humanism and political correctness will be buried in world war. Strengthen the position of the radicals, parochial nationalists. In Europe itself, in the West as a whole, society will be finally divided into castes: 1) owners of property, the “elite” - clan aristocracy, financial and economic clans, owners of TNK-TNB; 2) “citizens” who will cling to remnants of past well-being; 3) “non-citizens” - migrants, including “white slaves” from Eastern Europe, descended “citizens”, etc. The global slave-owning “pyramid” is a “bright future” according to the plans of the owners of the West.
The Fourth World War itself develops as a conflict of civilizations. The North-South confrontation, the Islamic world is confronted with European and Russian civilizations. In the long term, it is possible to connect the states-civilizations of India and China. India can face Pakistan. China will be obliged to intervene if Central Asia is blown up, through which important transport and fuel communications go, as well as the implementation of the leading project of the Celestial Empire, the New Silk Road. It is also possible to intensify the Pacific Front - through the war on the Korean Peninsula, the conflict along the line Japan - China, Vietnam, the Philippines - China, Taiwan - China, India - China. A number of other countries are being drawn into the anti-Chinese alliance, scaring them with the "Chinese threat." The United States is behind the backs of all the opponents of China, but the Americans themselves are not going to the front line, for this there is the "infantry". The United States supports all potential opponents of China, making their ranks. In particular, they pump up the sea, air and expeditionary muscles of Australia, strengthen their positions in South Korea and the Philippines, support the militarization of Japan, etc.
Turkey has long gone to war (Turkey - the project "Ottoman Empire-2"; New Ottoman Empire). Ankara gradually abandoned the leading line of the previous period - a secular state, where the army is a guarantor of secularism, in favor of the so-called. "Moderate Islamization". Opponents of Islamization in the army were repressed.
Ankara, strengthening its geopolitical positions, army and navy, economy, has become a powerful regional power. At the same time, Turkey launched the project “New Ottoman Empire” (“Ottoman Empire - 2”, “Great Turan”). The Turkish elite built its domestic and foreign policy on three main principles: 1) neo-Ottomanism - with the help of the media, cinema, youth policy, the Turks create idealized ideas about the Ottoman Empire. The idea of a leading, progressive role of Turkey in the Middle East is being introduced. In foreign policy there was an opinion about the need for expansion: to the south-west - in the direction of Syria-Lebanon-Egypt, the south - Iraq and the countries of the Persian Gulf, the east - Transcaucasia. Crimean peninsula and north - the Balkans.
New Pan-Turkism. The Turks worked closely with Azerbaijan, the Crimean Tatars, penetrated into the North Caucasus and the Volga region. Actively mastered Central Asia. Turkey is positioned as the core, center of the Turkic world, the “Great Turan”.
Turkish Eurasianism. Turkey is considered the center of Eurasia, a “bridge” from Asia to Europe, between the Islamic world and Europe. Turkey is currently working on the role of the mediator between China and Europe, as part of the Great Silk Road project.
It should be noted that this ideology was partially developed by the Anglo-Saxons, the days of the “cold war”, when Turkey was planned to be made the leader of the Islamic world, as opposed to the Soviet Union. Ankara modernized this idea. The collapse of such old regional centers of power as Iraq, Syria, Libya, the weakening of Egypt and Iran (which came under sanctions), allowed Turkey to claim the role of leader in the “Caliphate” project, that is, the united Islamic (Sunni) world. Currently, Turkey has entered into an alliance with the second leading center of this project, Saudi Arabia, which heads the Arab monarchy bloc. Turkey and Saudi Arabia want to finish off Syria at the head of Assad, and not allow Iran to restore its position.
The external situation has long been favorable for the Turkish expansion. In the Balkans: Greece "lies", decimated by the economic crisis; Yugoslavia is completely fragmented, and the process of crushing continues. There are powerful and passionate "points of support" - Muslim Albanians, including Kosovo and Bosnians. A powerful influx of Muslim migrants creates an entire "army of chaos." The Slavic world of the Balkans is fragmented, decomposed, "on knives", the elites are Westernized. Europe itself is experiencing a lot of problems, it will soon not be up to the Balkans. The Balkans may well become a new “powder keg” that will blow up southern Europe and create a new Balkan front of world war.
South Caucasus: Georgia is dismembered, its combat potential is close to zero and can easily lose Muslim Ajaria. The problem of Nagorno-Karabakh creates a real possibility of a major war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. And without the help of Russia, Armenia will be crushed.
Crimea, Ukraine: Turkey had a traditional influence on the Crimean Tatars. During the collapse of Ukraine and the reunification of the Crimea with the Russian Federation, Turkey as a whole was neutral, as the Russian Federation and Turkey have strong economic ties. However, after Russia launched a military operation in Syria, the situation changed. Geopolitics, military strategy above and long-term economic interests that can be restructured. From here provocation from Su-24, refusal from public apologies and punishment of those responsible for the incident and further escalation. What caused the most serious crisis between Moscow and Ankara in the entire modern history, since the 1920-s. Therefore, Ankara began to work out the issue of using the Crimean Tatars and Ukraine in the confrontation with Russia.
Iraq and Syria: Turkey actively participated in the dismemberment of these countries, supporting US policy. In Iraq, Turkish troops in recent years regularly conduct "counter-terrorist operations" against Kurdish armed groups. The situation is similar with Syria. At the same time, the Turks plunged headlong into the Syrian war and simply can’t get away from there. Turkey supports a number of different gangs: from "moderate" to radical. There is evidence of links with the "Islamic State" (a banned organization in Russia). Turkey is interested in Turkomans, a nation ethnically close to the Turks. There is a certain economic interest. At the same time, Turkey cannot allow the creation of a Syrian (Western) Kurdistan in the ruins of Syria. This raises the question of Turkish (Eastern) Kurdistan. The Turkish army is already fighting the Kurds on its territory. Syrian Kurdistan will be a springboard for the destruction of Turkey itself.
Kurdish question threatens to destroy Turkey
Not surprisingly, Ankara has set an ultimatum for the United States to choose between Turkey and the terrorist (from a Turkish point of view) Kurdish Democratic Union party. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called on Washington to choose either Turkey or the Democratic Union party of the Syrian Kurds as its ally. “How can we trust you? Who are your partners? ”Stated Erdogan. After a pause, the States replied that they did not consider DS to be terrorists. The representative of the US State Department, John Kirby, said that Washington is working with both parties. The representative of the State Department said that the United States does not consider the Democratic Union of Syrian Kurds to be terrorists, but on the contrary, it believes that its members are “effective fighters with ISIS inside Syria”. When asked to clarify who is leading a more effective fight against the IG - Turkey or the Kurds, Kirby again could not make a choice, noting only that "each is useful in its own way."
Ankara's concern is understandable. Kurdish activity is constantly increasing, and with the support of the United States, European countries and Israel. First, Iraqi Kurdistan separated from Iraq de facto. True, Ankara was able to improve relations with Erbil. Then Ankara achieved “historic success” made peace with the Kurdish Workers Party. However, the controversy grew and 25 July 2015, the Kurdistan Workers Party declared that it was impossible to continue a truce with Turkey. Began a new round of confrontation with the Kurds in Turkey. In addition, the Kurdish movement in Syria has intensified, which leads to the emergence of an autonomous Syrian Kurdistan, which becomes the basis for action against Turkey.
If earlier the attention of the Kurds was associated with the IS, now they are increasingly able to act against Turkey. The relations with the “Islamic state” of the Kurds are quite logical: we don’t need someone else’s, but we don’t give up ours. That is, the Kurds fiercely defend their territories in Iraq and Syria, but do not go any further. The period of fierce fighting in Syria, when ISIS troops stubbornly rushed to the north and planned to eliminate the Kurdish bridgeheads along the border, ended. The Syrian Kurds, with the support of the Iraqi Kurds, managed to repel the ISIS offensive near Kobani and drove them back. In Iraq, the picture is about the same: the Kurdish militia groups mostly knocked ISIS out of the territories that they consider their own and have lost their offensive outburst. The Kurds do not want to fight for “foreign” territories. In turn, the IG is more interested in other areas. As a result, the Kurds were intensified, organized, received combat experience and weapon (including from Western countries) now have the time and opportunity to direct efforts towards solving the main task - the creation of an independent Kurdistan. At the same time, new Kurdish authorities, young and uncompromising, rose to this wave, and the positions of the old leaders, who were in compromise with Turkey, were shaken.
The appearance of the rear - Syrian Kurdistan, is of great importance for the Kurds and Turkey. Earlier, when Turkey’s neighbor was strong and united Syria, the Kurds did not have such an opportunity. Damascus itself was suspicious of the Kurds and did not give them any will. Now the Kurds have received a rear where they can prepare operations, replenish units and reserves, leave Turkey in case of danger. Moreover, Turkey itself has created this threat to itself de facto when it took part in the destruction of Syria, and even on the first roles. In Ankara, they forgot that a double-edged sword. Destroying Syria in its geopolitical, military-strategic, economic interests, Ankara simultaneously created the threat of an IG breakthrough to the east, destabilization of the Turkish territory itself, in particular, through the masses of migrants and refugees, and activated the Kurdish movement.
Not surprisingly, the blockade of Aleppo in Ankara is perceived as a “red line”, beyond which Turkey will be forced to take independent steps. With or without the United States and NATO. Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu told a meeting of the parliamentary faction of the ruling Justice and Development Party he headed: “We will return our historical duty. Once our brothers from Aleppo defended our cities - Sanliurfa, Gaziantep, Kahramanmaras (during the First World War), now we will defend heroic Aleppo. Behind his defenders are all Turkey. ” In fact, this is a military statement. Behind the promises of the Turkish Prime Minister Davutoglu to “protect” the militant-controlled Syrian city of Aleppo may be the beginning of the creation of a “no-fly zone”, in order to support the opponents of Assad, and a full-scale invasion to create Turkish, and possibly Saudi, influence zones.
Washington understands this perfectly and maintains free hand. The Anglo-Saxons are accustomed to acting with someone else's hands and with the help of someone else's cannon fodder. Ankara simply has nowhere to go. It is impossible to retreat: this is the failure of the policy of all the recent years and the strengthening of the Kurdish positions. This is a destabilization of the internal situation. Erdogan and Davutoglu will show their weakness, they will not forgive their own. However, an open invasion of Syria, even with the support of the Arab monarchies, leads to poorly predictable negative consequences. Turkish intervention is fraught with a clash with Russia: from a local conflict to its escalation into a full-scale war. And this brings the war in the Middle East to a new level and raises the question of the actions of NATO countries and the United States.
At the same time, Washington and London are doing well. On the one hand, they provoke Turkey into invasion and conflict with Russia. The masters of the West will greatly benefit from such a conflict. The fourth world war will reach a new level. Turkey and Russia will be destabilized. And the main goal of the world war is destabilization and the collapse of large national states into small and “independent” state formations. Turkey masters of the West do not mind. According to the principle - the moor did his job, the moor can leave. The collapse of Turkey into parts and the war on its territory quite fit into the global strategy of "divide, poison and rule."
On the other hand, the masters of the West are pushing Turkey into a war, offering it neither help, nor participation, only moral support. It is beneficial for the masters of the West to push Russia and Turkey, and locally in Syria. This leads to the fact that NATO can stay on the sidelines, bringing down further sanctions on Russia and a wave of criticism in the style of “Northern Mordor” attacking “free and democratic” countries.
In this way. The United States and NATO remain free to choose. They can intervene, or they can stand aside, limiting themselves to diplomatic and economic measures. They can intervene much later when Russia and Turkey are exhausted (economy and armed forces), which will allow Kurdistan to be isolated from Turkey, and to organize a “crusade” against Russia, according to the scenario of the Eastern (Crimean) War 1853-1856. And such a scenario is quite possible. This is shown by recent NATO actions to strengthen positions in the East - in the Baltic States, Poland, Romania, the Baltic, and Black Seas. As well as the growth of Russophobia in Finland, Norway and Sweden. At the same time the Baltic Limits, Poland, Romania, Ukraine and Turkey mobilized will act as “infantry”.
Turkey has now virtually no choice: to admit defeat or to send troops. The Turkish leadership was stymied by both the actions of the West and its own policies.
To be continued ...