Military Review

There is a cultural war, a cruel war

113
You know, I’ve never been a military man, I even served the army alternatively for a number of reasons, but I think that I’m not very wrong with the truth if I say that “Almaty”, “Caliber”, and other equipment are very necessary, no doubt but only in extremely rare situations. It is not so important for the self-defense of a nuclear power, which Russia is today. Even if you equip the army instead of the T-90 with the pre-war T-26, you want to "smell what it smells" weapons plutonium, still will not increase. Do not think that I criticize the military-industrial complex or the government for excessive squandering for military needs, on the contrary, I argue that military spending is not superfluous at all. But today, the main threat to Russia is not the new American ATGM, not Tanks and not even missile defense. The great information war, which has been going on long enough to be noticed, in the event of our defeat will “give” us such consequences that the inhabitants of Hiroshima who died in a nuclear fire startled in the afterlife from horror. Trying to cover in detail all aspects of the information war in one article (perhaps even in a special book) is pure adventure, so I will try to give an overview of what is happening in one particular theater of war, which I know firsthand - on the front of Russian cultural life.


There is a cultural war, a cruel war


As far as art influences the upbringing of a person, his education as a person, his views, deeds, words and qualities, I think, it does not make sense to tell. Everyone understands how big his role is. But, nevertheless, we often regard art as lightly, as something insignificant, something so abstract and beyond the laws of logic, that there is no point in even studying it seriously. Meanwhile, as already mentioned, art, which affects us in the most direct way, surrounding us from birth to death, from home to work, at subway stations, in squares, in airspace, every day, every minute and every second, is in fact the triumph of logic, methodology and, if you will, the mechanics of emotion, psyche, soul and mind of man. Art is an extremely rational engineering machine of human souls based on the rigid code of laws of nature, and it depends on how music a child has been listening to since childhood, what tales mom tells it, what cartoons he sees on the TV screen. to other people, how it will develop spiritually, intellectually and physically, with what dedication it will work, what ideals to serve, what goals to pursue. And it is the people formed by a particular culture that make up nations and states. So it can be argued that the fate of the state, its future depends directly on how it relates to the cultivation of certain qualities in its construction material - a person, in other words, from culture.

Like various types of weapons, various branches of culture have different influences, have their own scope and also depend on the development of certain types of technologies. Until the twentieth century, literature had the most significant influence on the souls of people, “high” music and theater were slightly behind it, and visual arts and architecture were less influential. The recording and playback devices invented at the end of the 19th century gave impetus to the increasing influence of music. Television and radio, which appeared in the 20th century, on the one hand, significantly pressed all other branches of culture, on the other hand, helped popularize theatrical productions, musical works, and partly literary works. In the end, television has become an independent art form. Nevertheless, the emergence of the Internet can be considered the most significant stage in the evolution of culture. The Internet, on the one hand, allowed man to enrich himself with all the informational benefits of civilization created from ancient times to our days, but on the other, he brought to a qualitatively new level intercultural competition, which leads to ideological diffusion with an excess of eclecticism and internal antagonisms. The network has allowed its most influential players to impose a certain culture on the weaker, if not completely led to the degradation of the cultural level of people due to an overabundance of information.

Culture is conventionally divided into “elite”, having an impact on a relatively small group of initiates (or better said immersed) individuals in it, and “popular”, that is, folk, demanded in wide circles. As was said, the division is very conditional. For example, operatic art is in principle considered to be elitist, since at the time of its appearance, in the epoch of its heyday, and until recently, it was not accessible to everyone. But the Bolsheviks, pursuing a reform of culture and education, popularized the opera, making it accessible to the masses and educating in them the skills of perception of the sublime and complex art, extracting from it not only pleasure, but also experience, skills to expand the methodological base. In this step and in many others, the Bolsheviks consistently work to educate the high level of spiritual development of the masses when the people (plebeians, if you will) were intensively raised and raised to the level of elitist (patricians). Thus, the phenomenon of the Soviet person is a rather rare and positive cultural phenomenon in stories our state.

Popular art grew with the people. It is enough to compare the popular (“pop”) singers of the Soviet and democratic periods of our history in order to understand what is being said. The Soviet "equivalents" of modern bilan-arbenin-sukachevs (the above can be described as TSB - stupid, self-satisfied mediocrity, this abbreviation will be used further) were such personalities as Georg Ots, Muslim Magomayev, Aida Vedischeva, Yevgeny Martynov and another whole band of outstanding musicians personalities. It can be said without exaggeration that many modern singers of the elite class can hardly reach the level of popular Soviet artists. The Russian culture of the democratic period has made a confident step towards the degradation of the average level and is intensively moving away from the Russian culture towards the notorious modern Western culture, rotten mincemeat from the scraps of subcultures gathered in the endless fields of feasting marasmus in the West.

Но обо всем по порядку.

The most "influential" and sought-after branches of art that shape our culture are music, theater, cinema and literature. I apologize in advance (I will often do this) to all artists, architects and representatives of other branches of art for not including their field of activity in this list. Their contribution to the common cause is great, but on a modern computer-dependent and button-speaking individual (of which our state will consist in a considerable percentage in the next half century) the beauty of the Sistine Chapel frescoes or the magnificent layout and divine decoration of the Moscow Metro stations named after V. I. Lenin and the beautiful calligraphy of medieval written monuments does not seem to have any influence even on a subconscious level.

Fifty shades of gray


“It’s impossible to win Russians, we have seen this for hundreds of years. But Russians can be instilled in false values, and then they will win themselves. "
Otto Edward Leopold von Bismarck-Schönhausen.


What can I say? Do not read, do not read - and that's it! They do not read classics, do not read philosophers (even such popular ones as Marx and Nietzsche), do not read folk tales - a fount of wisdom, do not read scientific monographs. And then what is read? And now we have to read what is called "bestsellers", i.e. what sells well, or, more simply, consumer goods. At the same time, it is pious to believe that from this you become more “individual” and unique. We read Haruki Murakami, even if the author is not bad, but absolutely alien to us, carrying completely different values ​​(it would be better to read Akutagawa Ryunoske - closer and clearer). We read Daria Dontsova! You will laugh, but the degrading, brainwashing detectives have huge ratings (as if not only that her writing was the reason for the closure of Rutrecker). Today, all sorts of parodies (or even clones) are read to the works of the Strugatskys, as monotonous as they are meaningless and useless.



I admit one weakness: I like to drop in the person reading the subway over his shoulder and read with him. So, I don’t know, maybe I didn’t come across such people, but I have never seen Tolstoy, Pushkin, Turgenev or Dostoevsky read. Our Russian classics, or rather, not so, but this: our Russian classics, has become "irrelevant." From the Russian names one can only hear the name of the paper maker Akunin-Chkhartishvili or Nikolay Perumov. Young people read, as a rule, foreigners are not of the highest class - not Balzac, of course, not Voltaire, you can hardly find the young reader Remarque in the library. And what is read? All sorts of waste semi-finished products, a wide variety of "fifty plates of the first" and other things not burdened with meaning and the idea of ​​garbage. The only thing that attracts the young reader in literary characters today is the protest of a gray personality, nothing but protest, and protest for the sake of protest. Not for the sake of something new, not for the sake of one ideal, but just like that, because there is nothing more outstanding, nothing individual in it, except for his personal and, meanwhile, imposed on him from outside a protest against everything around him. The young reader, poisoned in everyday life with an excess of light, constantly surrounding him, unnecessary, intrusive and imposed, frankly garbage information, is no longer able to digest Shakespeare, Hamlet’s throwing is alien to him, like Macbeth he is driven by pride and vanity, and Caesar’s words “Trus dies many times until death, and a brave death tastes only once! ”they will not awaken anything in it. There is no place for monumentality in his life, no place for global thought, no fatum, no rock, no reverence for titanic personalities, no such deeply Russian feeling as awareness of the need for achievement. All this has sunk into oblivion. The epoch of romantic and deeply carnal, but elevated heroes, on whose examples one can learn, has passed, because we are surrounded by gray and medium ones, even at the mercy of any more or less distinguished personality is sulfur, like dirty snow, because there is no need for fears and hunger fight, love is not sought, it is bought, no meanings are sought, they are imposed, and not convincingly, but categorically. Now they learn by examples of prudent betrayal, cunning, arrogant, arrogant arrogance, and by passion, love, and spiritual impulse, they mean the groundless "hysteric" of the petty, fragile little soul of a deep gray, inexpressive and not outstanding protagonist.

The loss of world classics abroad is not so bad, but by losing our literature, we lose the beauty and culture of speech. I am silent about the fact that now third-graders are completely free to communicate on mats and hair dryers. Even speech deprived of this mud becomes poorer and poorer every day, sentences are simplified, phraseological units that have become incomprehensible become empty, literacy is emasculated and disappears, the meaning of words is lost. Oh, yes ... The meaning of words. Today we do not understand the terms used in everyday life, and this is terrible. Newfangled western buzzwords appear that do not mean something new, which we did not have before, which are not technical or medical terminology (well, there is no adequate Russian analogue to the words "TV", "computer" or "adenoma"), but are called upon to exorcise, replace with us the familiar Russian words. Not a manager, but a manager, not a businessman, but a businessman, not a bodyguard, but a security guard, not a walk, but a promenade. And this is not a necessity, it is, as the satirist Zadornov says, “fashionableness”, the desire to cover up one hundred and fifty shades of dullness and inconspicuousness. If you express yourself with words dubbed from Western languages, then you are definitely “cool”, you are “in the subject line”, not lagging behind. And along with the original sound of Russian words, we lose the possibility of a subconscious understanding and analysis of meaning. We lose Russianness, if you like. We cease to be ourselves. It will only remain to replace the Cyrillic alphabet with the Latin alphabet, the question of this sounds more and more often, and togda na russkoy tzivilizatzii mojhno byd'et stavit 'zhirniy krest.

For a masterpiece and three notes is a bit too much

«
No music is sweeter than the angelic voices of the children, if you don’t particularly listen to the words they utter. ”
Logan Pearsall Smith.


Honestly, I don’t even know where to start. Probably, you need to remember about Russian music from its very inception, to recall its youth, maturity, etc., to finally understand how it has come to such senility, which is starting to happen with it now, in our day.



I think that I will be able to surprise you, but “Black Raven” and “Kalinka Malinka” are not Russian folk songs. Today, real folk songs for an inexperienced listener, unprepared, unaccustomed to authentic music, will be akin to a long lecture on a subject like logic for a young student in love. The songs of the Russian people, which have come down to us since the time of Prince Vladimir, are the national epic about the deeds of the sons of the Russian land, these are epic tune with a very primitive melody with a simple rhythm, legends about work, about heroism, about love suffering, humorous and satirical sketches. They can somehow remind songs of the peoples of ancient Scandinavia and the German lands, also called to teach and educate descendants. But Russian music has one more distinctive quality: throughout its growth, its development as a professional art, it has not lost this main quality - informativeness. This feature, which Bayan carefully carried in the music, put guslars into the strings and sang the narrators, this is the sound that sounded in the buffoon laughter, this same passion that was written on paper, spelled with a spell in the piano keys of Glinka, Borodin, Tchaikovsky. Each time, absorbing new trends from the West, then from the South, enriching themselves with the tunes of new peoples, revealing new qualities, being infused with Tatar pentatonics or a distant Cossack song, she did not cease to be the bearer of our spirit, the information that makes us us. Looking ahead, I can say that modern foreign performers of classical music consider Russian classics to be one of the most complex and original areas, where the vocal melody, orchestral accompaniment, a separate solo of each instrument, all the action is primarily subordinated not to the enjoyment of the hearing, but to the transmission of deep meaning, which the author has invested in his child, literally forging it from his soul and the soul of the whole Russian people. Russian love in Russian music is not the passion of a separate individual for another, it is the craving of one archetype towards its opposite, it is a spontaneous attraction without the right to take a breather. Russian tragedy in Russian music is the collapse and collision of centuries and millennia, this is unpredictable destruction and fall of everything and everywhere, these are flames erupting from the ground, these are scales worthy of the revelations of John the Theologian. Recall at least the opera by Boris Godunov by Modest Mussorgsky. Chronologically, its first act begins at the time when Tsar Boris came to power, and the last one ends at the time of the birth of the troubles and death of the elected king. How many destinies, how much blood and tears will spill through your mind and soul in a few moments of life, how much knowledge, how much experience, feeling, information (not naked, not from the pages of Wikipedia, but what you have lived and passed) you will receive. And then go to "Khovanshchina", whose narration begins immediately after the unrest and ends in the era of the accession of Peter the Great. And again the sea of ​​deaths, hopes, images of those times, our genetic memory, our spiritual heritage. This is the testament of the ancestors to us, which is pronounced in such a monumental voice, such a thundering sound, that such engines as the great Richard Wagner simply fade and grow dumb.

Soviet music, the new hypostasis of Russian music, was born with a volley of Aurora, grew out of a biting slogan and was tempered in the fire of revolution. Her childhood was spent in marches "On the valleys and on the hills", "Varshavyanka" and "Internazionale", new trends, new melodies, new horizons tirelessly submitted to her. “Boldly, comrades, in step,” “Cossack Steppe is led by Comrade Stalin” and “Life Has Become Better, Life Has Become More Fun” - we were told new songs, not a single note, without ceasing to be carriers of our “code”. From the first volleys of the Great War of the Fathers did not subside, “Get up, great country!” And led our glorious ancestors from the impregnable walls of Moscow to the den of the beast, crushing the fascist armored armadas of our people with a mighty choir of hearts and will of our people! »The song helped to restore the destroyed, create and build new. She said: “I love you life!” - sincerely, without pathos, she sounded from the heart with the voice of Bernes, she gracefully fluttered notes of Lyubov Orlova, she led the overtones of Georg Ots. "Life, do you remember the soldiers that died, protecting you?" - she did not forget, she demanded from the descendants to remember. Every note was pithy, not a single superfluous ringtone, every word was weighted, it was appropriate for the place and time.

And what is happening now? After the collapse of the Union, everything collapsed except for the earnings of a few small characters: the economy, the combat readiness of the army, education, medical care, etc. and the like, and culture along with them. I am silent about the fact that many musical genres that the Bolsheviks popularized again became “elite”, and some areas were completely sectarian. Well, reading, raise your hand those who are familiar with the first concert for piano and Tchaikovsky orchestra? And who remembers at least some melody from the cycle of piano pieces “Pictures from the exhibition” by Mussorgsky? I'm right, that there are very few of those who can boast acquaintance with the music of Rachmaninoff? Our origins are forgotten. Our music subsides. Moreover, the quality of performers of "elite" genres falls with each new generation. But what to do with modern folk music, which is now called the import word "pop" (pop is not the one with censer, but from the word popular, populus - the people)? You will forgive me, but if at the beginning of 90's “pops” there was at least something from the music, then today's “non-joke-pro-minibuses” are really built on three (THREE!) Notes. And what about the texts, which are now persistently called text? What do they have from Russian culture? NOTHING! A modern song does not make sense at best, otherwise there is either a sexual attraction of an unformed personality to the opposite sex without a gram of real feelings, or an attraction of an unformed personality to undeserved material benefits. At the same time, either without a rhyme, or with a “poor” verb rhyme, or with such a “mysterious” rhyme, such as “how the motor works - having won my heart”. Even the relative new genre for us "chanson" (Fr. chanson - song) managed to poison the alcohol-criminal "romance". From among such talented, extraordinary, witty people, do they dig up such garbage that they write "music" and "poems"? Composers and poets can not be called. Of all the modern groups, perhaps, only Lyube can rightly claim the right to be called the bearer of Russian culture (for which Rastorguyev has a low bow), although I could be mistaken, and there are a couple more teams from “popular” who are still “ours” spirit and mind. But they cannot compete with a horde of “bilans” unencumbered by the brain and soul. Just do not say that culture and music change over time. On the contrary, culture and economy (the latter to a greater degree) change time. And with the advent of capitalism and the culture of the gateway, the time of vulgarity and bad taste, timelessness has come to us. But who, I'm sorry, makes us listen to this? And our need for beauty, only in the absence of beauty, we listen to these slops. At best, all three-note masterpieces allow various “information bureaus” (or, as they are called “mass media”), which replicate these ugly clones, reproduce them, replacing them with real creativity. We had Tchaikovsky, who amazed with the beauty and richness of his melodies, now we have rap, which doesn’t have those at all, and, in my opinion, music genres are mistakenly classified. We had Vysotsky, who, in a hoarse voice, was pouring out his soul, now there is Dzhigurda, who, in a hoarse voice, belches his own lack of spirituality. What will the music of our era tell descendants? Is it possible to call modern Russian music Russian? What will the prostituted female writers, singing thongs, bluish, sugary boys in tight shorts tell our future generations? How then will historians and culturologists call our time, because the names of “unrest” and “lost generation” are already taken?

Theater starts from the gallows


“Never forget that the theater does not live by the brilliance of lights, the luxury of scenery and costumes, spectacular scenes, but the ideas of a playwright. A flaw in the idea of ​​the play can not be closed by anything. No theatrical tinsel will help. ”
Konstantin Nikolaevich Stanislavsky.


The Russian Drama Theater, Opera and Ballet is a whole galaxy of names, a century of tradition, a reason for more than a dozen major scientific works, a milestone in the history of world art history. But the most important thing is that all this is an important, visible part of our life. We reviewed the opera a little higher, and nothing bad can be said about Russian ballet. Unusual attention to trifles is a traditional feature of the Russian drama: every smallest trait of a person will be, like a magnifying glass, brought to the judgment of the viewer, every action will be carefully studied from all sides. It is the skill of impartiality, with a considerable amount of mockery, to show flaws, stupidity and shallowness or, on the contrary, point out a subtle feat of household soot smeared by household, the ability to carefully extract it for the eyes of the viewer is different for Gogol and Chekhov. Under the magnifying glass, we are examined by Fonvizin, Ostrovsky, Tolstoy, and many other great creators of the Russian drama. And this idea is brought to us by beautiful artists: Papanov, Mironov, Etush and many more great names. The Stanislavsky director's school is the best in the world, it has gathered in itself all the most significant and beautiful things that have happened in world art, this is not a school of “games” - it is a school of “life on the stage”.



The theater has always been and remains a stronghold of Russian art. And to say that everything is good in him and right, yes it is impossible, it will be dishonest. And the fish rots from the head. So far, the trend of “modernism” has touched, mainly metropolitan theaters, and has affected not the quality of the actors' play, it is still fluctuating within the normal range (although the preparation has now fallen below the baseboard compared to the Soviet period, and the younger generation of actors differ from the Soviet actor like a walnut Sun, while possessing tremendous aplomb and self-adoration). And it's not even in small funding. The problem is that the young Russian who replaced the Soviet directors for some reason are very often moral monsters. Yes, I’ll say this straight. I would like to recall one case for example.

Remember, at the beginning of last year under the walls of the Moscow Art Theater. Chekhov was thrown pig head. It would seem that the event is ordinary, and the action was carried out by so-called “Orthodox activists” (who before Orthodoxy, as I in a known position to Betelgeuse) under the guidance of the notorious Dmitry nicknamed “Enteo”. But when you try to watch the same play “The Ideal Husband” from Wilde’s play, you begin to understand that there’s nothing left of Wilde in the play, and the head of this “play”, Konstantin Bogomolov, must lie at the entrance to the Moscow Art Theater. I would call “this” pornography, but to be honest, I’m very much afraid to insult pornography with this, for “God’s Thought Action” is much dirtier and more disgusting. If we discard emotions and look purely technically, the plot in the interpretation of the “genius of directing” is reduced to prostitution, cattle, drug addiction, to such phenomena as pederastia and pedophilia. We can say the following about the director's work: incomprehensible, naive childishly and horribly vulgar “inter-line” metaphors, clowning, racing and crying. The potential audience is those who are in the setting of the play like a fish in water: drug addicts, “moths”, representatives of the political, if you can call it that, elites and other people from the “beau monde”. A vile impression, but their majesty "sees this." What do you need to have in your head instead of eyes to see like this? By the way, about the head. I look at the physiognomy of this creature, who imagines himself the creator of art, and I do not leave the feeling that before my eyes the representative of "those". I mean unconventional. And even the presence of the wife of this creature does not in the least change the situation (and even complements, if we recall how in the same “ideal husband” he divided the Darya Moroz topless). Obviously, as a teenager, Kostya did not enjoy the attention of the opposite sex.

And then another “genius” is recalled, which “sees it so” that it is disgusting to look at others, and at the same time it has the above described features of degradation - Timofey Kulyabin. By the way, too, apparently, gay. This one managed to play Wagner's "Tannhäuser". And there is such a Dmitry Chernyakov - a bigger fish, but the handwriting is the same: vulgarity, twisting the plot, "nudity." Also gay The homosexual lobby, by the way, is extremely strong in theatrical circles, the Ministry of Culture, and even in the State Duma. Fortunately, the farther from the capital, the less this dirt is in the theater and in everyday life.

By the way, for reference: all of the above "so seeing artists" are graduates of Europe's largest theatrical university - RATI GITIS. There is something to think about ...

Kinah won't, electricity is over


"If Mikhalkov is the sun of Russian cinema, then we are weary of the sun."
Vladimir Semenov.


Lenin not for nothing noticed that the movie - the most important of the arts. Being a synthesis of theatrical action, artistic perspective, music, cinema embodied a huge arsenal of techniques and methods of influencing the viewer. In this it until recently had no equal at all. Soviet cinema is a truly inexhaustible source of worldly wisdom, wit and just good mood, which we are served in a beautiful design. It is difficult to list all the quotes that are dazzling with our films and which still live in our Russian speech, decorating and enriching it. But we need to consider our culture not only through the prism of such beautiful comedies, melodramas, television plays and musical films. In our history there is an event that divides our life, our self-understanding into “before and after” - this is the Great Patriotic War. It is relevant even for the generation of the "nineties", who know about it only from the stories of participants, books (which are hardly read) and films. We will talk about war films, taking for comparison modern Russian war films, American, Soviet and Chinese films.



Speaking about the standard of the military film, one cannot pass over the silence of Ozerov's epic film “Liberation”, which shows us those tragic and glorious days from the perspective of a battle artist: from a bird's eye view we see hordes of fascist tanks, a dry line sounds orders and directives, the scale of the action is so high beyond the perception of mortal man, that it is impossible to realize and feel the individual tragedies of each participant. We see the battle with the inner gaze of the commander, we and our marshals are fighting for a just cause.

Quite differently, the genius of Sergey Bondarchuk in the film “They Fought for the Motherland” shows us the war. We are immersed in the inner world of the heroes of the film and already with their eyes we are looking at the battlefield and the war in general. Here is the jolly fellow and Lopakhin balagur, defying in front of his colleagues and local residents, this is Lopakhin, who took off his mask, and to the surprise of the viewer, turned out to be a serious person who linked his fate with the fate of the fatherland. Here Zvyagintsev, terrified by the burning wheat field, is a somewhat narrow-minded, straightforward and a little petty person, who meanwhile without a shadow of a doubt goes to the bayonet at the fascist machine gunner and defeats him not so much with skill as with vigor and fighting spirit. Before us stand the most different images of very different people in different situations. After the bombing, in which many soldiers are killed, life-affirming laughter is heard over the trenches: you cannot kill everybody, we are still alive, which means we have someone to fight back the fascists. Here the soldiers are preparing for the crossing and one of them, who cannot swim, is worried about this all the way. But all of them, so different, with all their strengths and weaknesses, do not give up their banner, they fight for the Motherland and sacrifice their lives without any doubt.

So filmed in the Soviet Union. There are many pictures with different directions of thought, but they all lead to one thing: we fought for our Motherland in that war, we put 27 of millions of lives on the altar of freedom, we have something to be proud of, we have something to strive for and where to grow, we have from whom to learn and from whom to take an example, and we should not forget anything and always be ready to work, fight and, if necessary, die for the right thing. So brought up in the Soviet Union.

American films about wars, with a huge reappraisal of the US contribution to World War II and a clear inferiority complex about Vietnam, however, do not suffer from poor quality. They paint their soldiers with brave, strong, courageous and immaculately devoted to their American dream. “Saving Private Ryan” is perhaps one of the best examples. But for contrast, it would be very interesting to see the creations of a younger and more inexperienced Chinese cinema. The film describing one of the events of the civil war in China, which in the Russian version is called “In the name of honor” or “Signal to gather,” struck me, frankly. Firstly, naturalism is beyond all praise and at the same time without enumeration (Mikhalkov is still learning and learning). Secondly, look at the attitude to your army, history, to your people and, most importantly, to the party. There is no decryption of “stupid” orders; there is not even a drop of “liberal” co-operation. There is an order, albeit suicidal, but justified by military necessity, - it is necessary to carry out. The film is a wonderful military drama-biography, in which there is a place and scale and the disclosure of personality and wisdom. Look, you will not regret. Another film - the film about the Xinhai Revolution "The Fall of the Last Empire" - all that was said about the previous film, plus Jackie Chan.

And what does modern Russian cinema present to us? A huge mountain, sorry, guano. Starting with the saboteur overflowing with clichés of “Diverters”, ending with lies, slander and filth poured on our Fatherland from the womb of Alexander Atanesyan along with the film “Bubbles”. This word is applicable both to the author of this creation, and to the author of the same story. But all this is drowning in the sea of ​​all kinds of “gums,” “our rush,” the dumbest serials and no less stupid films that our cinema, led by Zvyagintsev-svetozarovymi-funnel, produced. All equally soulless, unprincipled, and most importantly, low-quality. But we have two large chicken eggs, personifying the modern Russian film business, and we'll talk about them.

I have already mentioned in the article of the brilliant actor, director and screenwriter Sergei Bondarchuk. He is, without a doubt, a genius, and nature is resting on the children of geniuses. Alas, the Bondarchuk family was no exception.

I do not know whether Fede Bondarchuk was destined to follow in his father’s footsteps, but he went and went very confidently. At first, he was engaged in plagiarism, making clips for our pop star stars. copying the concept from western clips to the last frame. Then he became interested in cinema. Well, okay, his biography is freely available, it makes no sense to retell it. We are interested in his films about the war. Let's start with “9 Company”, which the author managed to call a “historical film”, the old-fashioned slogan of a slogan from some of the Rambo films: “They wanted to be loved ...” And what did the author show us? I am sure that one of the readers gave a military duty in Afghanistan, and someone served there as a father, uncle or grandfather. Ask if they had a regimental prostitute? They kissed her feet together? Probably not. Then compare the behavior of the Afghan warriors with the behavior of the main characters of the film - it seems? Also no. At the same time, the film has wonderful, expensive special effects, make-up, decent camera work. What is the matter? Was it worth it to strain so as to throw mud at people who defended our borders against dushmans, and our youth from the flow of drugs? I have the answer. But Fedya didn’t even understand how miserable from the point of spirituality he filmed the movie. It’s just that Fedya is a representative of the “golden youth”, who from childhood did not know the word “no”, who always had everything, and did not have to give anything for it, he was surrounded by similar “gold” ones. And it is the type of behavior of his “contemporaries-fellows” that he transfers to his heroes - hysterical, cowardly, devoid of logic, with bleached teeth, selfish, pampered children. It is this type of heroes that is chosen mainly in his film “Stalingrad”.

Yes, the name of the city of Stalingrad is sacred to me, and therefore I will call Bondarchuk’s film (with the help of blogger Evgeny Bazhenov) “They fought for Katya”. In addition to the dumbest blunders in terms of technology (like a fallen burning Heinkel that did not explode, rafting with poles across the Volga (who was on the Volga, understand) and crookedly drawn T-4), there are no less logical blunders (like the plan attacks on German positions without prior liquidation of oil storages with artillery and opponents, who sit in neighboring buildings, look at each other and do not shoot), and most importantly, a completely incomprehensible position of the narrator. The protagonist is snotty and hysterical, he is fighting not for Stalin and not for the Motherland, but for Katya, who is “used” by the whole platoon, the words of a fascist officer that all Russian bandits and bastards are not refuted by anyone (i.e. the author agrees with this), the Soviet sniper for the entire film only burns on women from among the prisoners, and not on the Germans. You can write a lot, even very much. But only one conclusion can be made: Fedya Bondarchuk is a cheap clip maker, a typical representative of TSB, who would like to make a good film, but there was not enough brains or spirituality. Is it our next “redhead” business ... Guess who is the enemy of Russian art in art №1?

Boyar Mikhalkov is an extraordinary and quite talented person, but he also has a number of drawbacks that may be inherent in the representative of the "gold" ones. And all this grows from a generic inferiority complex, expressed in a disproportionately great delusions of grandeur. Like his memorable dad, well, Nikita Sergeyevich would very much like to be a nobleman, so that with titles, yes honors, and even altogether, with slaves! But here, no matter how cool, but there is not a drop of blue blood. No, that's all. And Nikita is so angry at the whole Russian people: they don’t bow to his belt, they don’t appreciate the unearthly talent, and even the flasher is taken away, the Herods. Himself, he is ready for anyone to get a nice penny to wave his hat and lick a famous place. And Nikitkino's sick ego climbs out of all the cracks. First, he became a brave warlord Kotov - good, but not enough. And the film - rubbish and little pathos, and most importantly, almost no narcissism. He tried himself in the image of Tsar Alexander III, breathed the royal air, felt better ... And then it started. Perhaps, after “His among strangers ...” there was not a single worthy film with him, but from the point of view of mud, he updated his highs powerfully. Having resurrected the murdered Kotov in “Burnt-2” and poured into this already phantasmagoric, deprived image of a ton of his hypertrophied ego, without any realism, he decided not only to throw mud at us, but also our ancestors, and still alive veterans face spit all the poison that has accumulated over the years. There is only one hero in this “picture” - MIKHALKOOOV! He can dunk Stalin himself with his face into the cake, figure it out with the help of a fantastic finger holder (I didn’t understand what it was) with the hooligans and in general, he is a superman betmenovich. And besides this, the classically stupid "soviet" commanders, tanks on sails, the pilot of the Luftwaffe, defecating directly from the open cabin of the "Junkers", and mountains of corpses. Someone called Nikitkin "The Citadel" death pornography, but I will say that it is Nikitkin "spiritual" masturbation, it seems to him that he has thus risen. And in fact, as it was an empty place, it was never filled. I will not list all the stupidity, bloopers, and most importantly, the anti-Russian meanness with which this movie teems like an old sofa with bugs ...

By the way, so as not to say that I only see the bad, I recently watched the “One” movie, a pretty good movie. Hmm ... That's it!

Epilogue


I wanted to write about computer games, there is also nothing good, but I decided that it would be a bit too much. As always, questions arise. How come to life like that? Who is guilty? What to do?



How come? Yes, very simple. There is no state without ideology, contrary to the shameful 13 article of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Simply, if there is no state-national ideology, then there is anti-people. We skipped our popular ideology together with the Soviet Union, allowed traitors to power. They looted our economy and now, so that we could not see their frauds, chop the best Soviet educational system in the world into pieces, and in case we suddenly see and understand, they ruin our culture, divide us into religions and nations so that we never did not come together and did not start an irreconcilable struggle with them. While all kinds of Medinsky (worthy followers of Serdyukov's) are sitting in the Ministry of Insecurity, our culture will collapse and degrade. The word "spirituality" now risks becoming archaism and has almost become synonymous with "religiosity."

Our economy (and, therefore, the base of Russia as a state) is not even a market economy, it is of a colonial-raw type, we have the bowels, they give us beads (dollars). No need to swear and call for my "patriotic feelings." We are so strong, so we are surpassing the West, we are a superpower, and we ourselves do not know which side to “thrust” with an oil needle into Europe. This is the nature of our "economy" and its "crises". If someone does not understand, just in case, let me remind you: with this type of economic relations, a large population is unprofitable. The pipe is one, the more “owners”, the less for each individual is his piece of benefit. The benefit is divided: 99% - to Miller-Chubais, 1% - to the people. But the first is a shame that this 1% has to be torn from itself. Thus, from the point of view of the current economy, about 140 of millions of excess people, useless hungry mouths, live in the Russian Federation. It is clear that to kill them en masse and immediately fail. Therefore, a program of hidden genocide enters - deterioration of education, reduction of cultural needs and their maximum simplification (ie, “mundane”), deterioration in the quality of food, health care, complication of self-realization of the “real” economic sector with subsequent destruction (agriculture, industry - read new budget plan). In this case, Medina (very reminiscent in the image of an old woman lender from the famous work of Dostoevsky and Yatsenyuk), Livanov, Skvortsova, Medvedev - they all sit in their seats, and their work is more than effective. Shoigu is also in place, but someone must protect riches from capitalist competitors if they suddenly want to take it by force. No wonder Putin is "pleased with the work of the government." And judge for yourself: many families today are simply not able to support children, not to mention their studies; pensioners die earlier because of the inaccessibility of expensive drugs and the lack of qualified doctors; young people are buried in "smartphones" and do not see what is happening around them, rapidly degrading; an organized working class cannot be formed due to the lack of developed industry and the consistent “finishing up” of what remains.

Therefore, it is not necessary to think that the process of the disintegration of our society is natural and natural. It is ruled by our ruling elite and is a reflection of its economic interests. Western society is being destroyed by similar methods, and it should be noted that our people would not have suffered such a defeat as in a “civilized” Europe. What is the legalization of homosexuality, direct, orderly destruction of the institution of the traditional family and the statement of the interests of "minorities" over the interests of the majority. Therefore, they will cook us over low heat, like a frog from a famous parable.

Speaking of the fact that the theater is extremely politicized, it should be noted that politics, on the contrary, is extremely theatrical. Take a look at the scene (Channel One, for example) - this is the main character! Putin! His image reads Roland (a mighty, devoted hero who cannot be broken), something from Ilya Muromets (heaviness, Russian epic power), some Darth Vader (light bloom of a dark charismatic anti-hero, usually associated with service in the KGB) and Of course, Don Quixote (a romantic hero, a bit tragic, who is always looking into the distance and therefore does not see the problems described in the previous paragraph). We also have a vile dwarf traitor, his role is played by Medvedev. In addition to Don Quixote / Darth Vader, there is also a devotee Sancho Panza / General Maximilian Virs - Sergei Shoigu. There are two court jester: Zyuganov and Zhirinovsky. They are comic characters, antipodes of each other, designed to distract the viewer. There is a whole herd of thievish boyars, who play the extras. So that it would not be completely faceless, it contains familiar faces like Kobzon, Kabaeva, Valuev and others. There are also funny, not far-away priests of ancient gods like Mizulina and Milonov. There is a mandatory and their "evil orcs" - the so-called "liberal opposition". Their main striking force is the mass media and the local trolls. Here on the "liberasta" dwell in more detail.

It is not a secret for anyone that we still do not get rid of “everyday anti-Semitism” (I myself sometimes believe in the Jewish conspiracy). That is why the bulk of the “liberal opposition” is selected from the Jews: Dmitry Bykov, Yulia Latynina, Viktor Shenderevach, Boris Nemtsov, Valeria Novodvorskaya, Yevgenia Albats, Alexey Venediktov, Andrei Makarevich, Leonid Gozman, Iosif Rayhelgauz, Garry Kasparov, Tatyana Lokshina, Sergey Kiriyenko and so on. The full list will take about fifteen pages. Vladimir Soloviev and Anatoly Wasserman clearly do not fit into this concept: they show by their example that not all Jews are “liberals”, and therefore not all are enemies. I am willing to argue that all kinds of “Moscow soup” is completely on providing one of the “privile” corporations, and they play the role of “orcs” to divert people's anger and not allow it to concentrate on the real enemies - the destroyers and plunderers of our economy.

You can also give an example of such a phenomenon as "theater in the theater." Vladimir Vladimirovich will help us with this (I feel rightly that the spinal cord will feel like I will be "minus": after all, I have mentioned the holy in vain). If such actions as refusing to introduce a progressive tax rate, diplomatic failure (namely, failure) on the Ukrainian front (ideally, Ukraine should have been part of the Russian Federation already from 2008) and abstraction from the pressing problems of the people are completely understandable, since they affect economic the interests of the real owners of our country, here's how to deal with the Yeltsin center? Judge for yourself. Is it advisable to spend money during a crisis to open and maintain such a center during a deep crisis? No, nobody needs this center. Will it raise the GDP rating? No, we remember too well the rule of His Drunkenness. What then is the meaning of this center? Everything is pretty trite. This is a curtsey, a sign of respect in the form of a theatrical interlude for the direct superiors of the "guarantor". So he outlined his position and showed that he is with “them”, and not with us. Similarly, the so-called "de-Stalinization" can be characterized. The very name of the Father of the Nations horrifies the entire United Russia company, and the Russian people, on the contrary, associate with the very “justice above the law” to which he subconsciously and consciously seeks.

Therefore, the situation unfolds "somewhat differently" than the First Channel draws to us. We are stubbornly confronted with the West and with some post-Soviet republics (Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltic States). This is done by the efforts of the United States and England, with the tacit support of the Russian elite. This is necessary not to hide the class character of the war. For us, ours are the working people of the whole world, the enemies are the exploiters, and “their own” exploiters are not a bit better than the “Westerners”. They have one goal - your arched back. The Russian people, the Ukrainian people, the peoples of the Baltic states, Central Asia and the Caucasus should unite into a single whole, and this is possible only with a clear understanding of us as brothers, as one people. While we are at war with each other, while we are being poisoned, we are weak. When we pinpoint our enemies and win the first battle, we will not be stopped. To do this, we must revive our united, high culture, gain knowledge and experience, discard false prejudices.

By the way, we are not so bad. The orgy of vices and horror in the place of the once great European culture, which is created in Western countries, is powerful evidence of this. Despite the fact that serious damage has been inflicted on us (entire generations have been brought up as consumers, the Russian language is being destroyed), the consequences of which will still be felt for a long time, and the blows will be delivered more than once (just recently, they burned and want to evict in Pushkino, is about to introduce a new "tribute" for artists in the form of the law on SRO), we have more chances to win this battle than anyone else. We are required not to forget who we are, not to let our loved ones degrade, to constantly develop ourselves, unite and learn, learn and learn again.

Make sure that while playing at the computer, your child does not shoot at the Russian soldiers, even in the game. He should know exactly who his enemy is. Make sure that he does not watch modern low-grade films that carry a hostile program and values, let him watch the Soviet cinema, so it will develop properly. Let him read our and foreign classics, let him listen to music that has been proven for centuries. Keep your speech clear, get rid of barbarism. Temper the will, train your body and mind.
Author:
113 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rov81
    rov81 11 February 2016 06: 39
    +5
    The author smiled at Putin’s mix of abilities (a touch of dark power))) There is no need to anger the GDP, for it can play for many and like a whole death star!) Partners, do not annoy the commander in chief!
    1. Cormorants
      Cormorants 11 February 2016 06: 46
      +9
      I think there’s nothing to be afraid of, here is an example Carousel Channel is a good alternative to 2 + 2 Disney channels. I think the children will sleep peacefully.
      1. Mitek
        Mitek 11 February 2016 07: 04
        21
        Disconnected the children with nickelodeon and other gamma. Carousel left. I have never seen such a feverish drug addiction as on disconnected channels.
        1. Cormorants
          Cormorants 11 February 2016 07: 33
          +4
          Especially the brain endures the cartoon "Super Prison" it's just some kind of kapets.
          1. Cormorants
            Cormorants 11 February 2016 07: 40
            +5
            On the whole, I agree with the author, but Mikhalkov's "Sunstroke" is just great, I don't think he is mediocrity, the Besogon project is not bad either +. On the 9th company I agree, the Soviet soldiers did not behave like that. They fought for Katya, too, I agree, a purely commercial project, we are waiting for 28 Panfilovites. I'll look at one.
            And I think they’ll start reading the classics, we just need to do projects more often commensurate with the recent reading of Tolstoy, more a project involving celebrities and the older generation (remember our reflection), we didn’t stop reading, but you stopped RE-READ.
            1. Cormorants
              Cormorants 11 February 2016 07: 43
              +1
              In general, the article is not bad, only the author is an ardent communist, and from his bell tower assesses the situation. I am not against the USSR, but such an analysis of the topic should be impartial.
              1. Cormorants
                Cormorants 11 February 2016 08: 05
                -8
                As for the power, you try to give an ideology to a hungry person, the ideology in a country that has recently experienced a collapse, default, privatization, etc. would not go. It is necessary to solve economic problems, and then introduce ideology, by the way, the president recently "gave a hint" about the idea, the idea of ​​patriotism, a start has already been made, I think this topic will be developed by anyone who should.
                1. Dembel77
                  Dembel77 11 February 2016 09: 14
                  +6
                  I sincerely thank you for an extremely important article, and for the author and site management. It is a pity that the fruits of a deliberate struggle with culture in Russia already exist. And these fruits can be reaped in large quantities on the comment pages of this blessed site. Sorry, I will not call anyone specifically, so as not to offend anyone in vain. Itself is not far gone. Well, I’ll say briefly about the article - my soul cries, seeing how easy it is to turn people into unicultural and limited! All is true!
                  1. Mahmut
                    Mahmut 11 February 2016 10: 32
                    -1
                    competition, which leads to philosophical diffusion with an overabundance of eclecticism and internal antagonisms.

                    And with that phrase he wants to hook young
                2. SveTok
                  SveTok 11 February 2016 09: 30
                  +5
                  Idealogy does not interfere with the development of the economy, but rather increases its growth many times and in such a state there is no place for oligarchs and crooks of all stripes.
                3. gergi
                  gergi 11 February 2016 09: 41
                  -2
                  Loving your country is the main ideology. Everything else is a verbal screen for dishonest ideologues who wash loot on it.
                4. veksha50
                  veksha50 11 February 2016 12: 07
                  +1
                  Quote: Cormorants
                  you try to give ideology to a hungry person



                  And where do you see hungry people around you ???

                  Here's how many cliches flashed: "hungry pensioners", "hungry people" ...
                  What, like in besieged Leningrad, or what ???

                  But the economy, or rather what we mean - the national economy, cannot be raised without ideology ... The collectivization and industrialization of the whole country took place precisely on the rise of patriotism, and the rise of ideology was at the head of this rise ...
                  1. Mr. Pip
                    Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 12: 22
                    -1
                    Quote: veksha50
                    Collectivization and industrialization of the whole country took place just on the rise of patriotism, and at the head of this rise was ideology

                    That is, only and exclusively on the "rise of patriotism" - that is, the "nationalization" of your property by the collective farmers was greeted exclusively by shouts of "Hurray, I will give my cow to the collective farm in spite of the bourgeoisie from the USA" ?!
                    That is, there were no dissatisfied, there was NOT ALL ?! fellow
                    1. veksha50
                      veksha50 11 February 2016 12: 31
                      +3
                      Quote: Mr. PIP
                      That is, there were no dissatisfied, there was NOT ALL ?!



                      No need to exaggerate ... I am far from being a revolutionary, and the threatened revolution is even afraid ...

                      However, collectivization was carried out by WHO ??? That's right, ideological revolutionaries to the marrow ... And they fell down crosses from churches ...

                      PS Honestly, my great-grandmother said that collectivization in the village was carried out by drunk and ragged ...

                      But industrialization was carried out, dams and factories were built "in knee-deep mud, with a pick and a shovel, so that tomorrow the water would rustle in the turbines" - here there was true patriotism ... And virgin lands, and much more ...
                5. cast iron
                  cast iron 12 February 2016 03: 17
                  +2
                  Patriotism for money bags and thieves? No, thank you.
                  1. PHANTOM-AS
                    PHANTOM-AS 12 February 2016 03: 27
                    +1
                    Quote: cast iron
                    Patriotism for money bags and thieves? No, thank you.

                    Join us! good drinks
                6. PHANTOM-AS
                  PHANTOM-AS 12 February 2016 03: 58
                  +2
                  Quote: Cormorants
                  you try to give ideology to a hungry person,


                  "Do you want to make your country advanced in the sense of raising it
                  statehood, - raise the literacy of the population, raise your culture
                  countries, the rest will follow. "

                  (IV meeting of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) with senior officials of national
                  republics and regions "v.5 p.329.)
                  I.V. Stalin.
                  1. cast iron
                    cast iron 21 February 2016 02: 23
                    0
                    The communists saved the people from greedy ghouls-bourgeois and bureaucrats sung with them, so the hungry people heeded the words of both Lenin and Stalin, and did the right thing. When I get bureaucrats on a Mercedes S-class, whose son is sitting either in the State Duma or in a business that receives state funding about patriotism, then I boldly send such an official in a certain direction along with his patriotism. I studied very well the First World War of 1914-1918 - there, too, ordinary peasants were poured bourgeois about patriotism towards the country. As a result, 2 million corpses for the financial interests of people who were later dumped into Civil in France.
                7. miv110
                  miv110 12 February 2016 07: 43
                  0
                  It seems that we are the only "stutterers" who control us, everyone stutters and stutters, and they are in no hurry to develop something, moreover, they stick a stick in the wheel to those who, in your opinion, should develop the topic.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. antoXa
                antoXa 11 February 2016 11: 30
                0
                Cormorants
                I agree! It seems that the author says the right things, but from reading the sediment remains that he writes something wrong ...
                The article is very reminiscent of such a conclusion "I am the only one D'artagnan." I think the same Mikhalkov would have found an answer to the author)
                1. gergi
                  gergi 13 February 2016 18: 13
                  0
                  The handwriting shows the political leader. Always could not stand them, everywhere his mug was not clever poked, life taught us. At the trough first.
              4. larand
                larand 11 February 2016 13: 10
                +3
                Quote: Cormorants
                In general, the article is not bad, only the author is an ardent communist, and from his bell tower assesses the situation.

                The author says that there was culture in the USSR. Maybe somewhere naive, somewhere painting life, which does not exist, but which can be created. And in Russia there is almost no culture of its own, the remnants of the Soviet can no longer compensate for that frank abomination that comes from the screens and from the stage. The only principle of "culture" in the Russian Federation is that for your money we will at least eat it right on stage.
              5. alecsis69
                alecsis69 13 February 2016 17: 17
                0
                Honestly, the last paragraphs are given not so much by communism, but rather by ardent Trotskyism. We inflate the world fire and throw Russia into the furnace of the world revolution.
                As for the current state of the Russian mass cultural environment, it is hard to disagree with the analysis of the author. The more dangerous his slogans.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. dark_flame
              dark_flame 11 February 2016 18: 25
              +1
              Quote: Cormorants
              And I think they’ll start reading the classics, we just need to do projects more often commensurate with the recent reading of Tolstoy, more a project involving celebrities and the older generation (remember our reflection), we didn’t stop reading, but you stopped RE-READ.

              I’m not a fan of classics and I will never be one, I’m 20 years old and in my opinion Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, and other representatives of classical literature are already outdated, in the same Metro trilogy I saw more sense than in all the classics that I went to school. The point of the article is not that we stopped reading the classics, but that now there are few good writers and few worthy of reading works.
              1. alecsis69
                alecsis69 13 February 2016 17: 21
                0
                Just Tolstoy and Dostoevsky in 15 - 17 years can understand the percentage of 10. You are 20, re-read another 20, and then another 20.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Baloo
        Baloo 11 February 2016 11: 19
        +4
        from the Carousel Channel example is a good alternative to 2 + 2 Disney channels. I think the children will sleep peacefully.
        I support! Who knows how many souls were distorted by the Simpsons, which were banned in Eastern Europe, and played on Russian channels from morning to evening. The carousel should be shown on all regional channels at a time convenient for family viewing. Children need not "entertaining", but "teaching". hi
        1. Mr. Pip
          Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 55
          -3
          Quote: Balu
          Who knows how many souls are warped by the Simpsons

          Cool cartoon, after uni I liked to watch at dinner, but South Park will be better good
          And for "teaching" there are special channels on YouTube or special books stop
        2. veksha50
          veksha50 11 February 2016 12: 09
          0
          Quote: Balu
          Children need not "entertaining", but "teaching".



          Plus "educated" ... All Soviet cartoons taught and brought up kind, philanthropic ...
          1. Mr. Pip
            Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 12: 24
            -3
            Quote: veksha50
            All Soviet cartoons taught and educated good, philanthropic

            That is, parents were no longer needed by Soviet children - kind and light brought up cartoons, a kindergarten and a summer "camp" ?! Well settled down, brought up to the "brothers" from the 90s fellow
            1. veksha50
              veksha50 11 February 2016 12: 34
              +1
              Quote: Mr. PIP
              That is, the parents of Soviet children were no longer needed



              I already told you in the top post that you are exaggerating ...
              It's about comparing Soviet cartoons and different "Simpsons" and the like ...
              1. Mr. Pip
                Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 13: 05
                -5
                Quote: veksha50
                I already told you in the top post that you are exaggerating

                Maybe I just walked away from the main topic, but IMHO you are initially wrong.
                I, despite watching Soviet cartoons in my childhood, saw them already in adulthood on the Internet from nothing to do - this, excuse me, is some kind of nonsense addict!
                The impression was that the creators of the cartoons had an ideological task from childhood to educate people who could "bear all the burdens of service" while living in the Soviet Union and serving in the Soviet army request
                Western cartoons, the same "Chip and Dale" is 100500 times kinder and more humane than the same "hedgehog in the fog" and "snow before last" - this is generally some kind of arthouse not for the middle brain, Lars von Trier (from the mass) is nervous smokes request
                And with regards to the 100 times mentioned The Simpsons, this is actually originally an Animated Comedy Series for a predominantly "matured" target audience (that is, those who have at least graduated from school) and, by the way, according to Time magazine, the best television series of the XNUMXth century.
                Anyway, where are the cartoons and where are the years of life and education as part of an accomplished person ?!
        3. dark_flame
          dark_flame 11 February 2016 17: 28
          +1
          Quote: Balu
          Children need not "entertaining", but "teaching". hi

          Children need to be raised, and if the father behaves like Homer Simpson, then his son will become Bart, and it does not matter what cartoons he watches.
      3. Mexovoy
        Mexovoy 11 February 2016 16: 55
        +1
        2x2 channel for adults. How much can you drag it to where you do not need to?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Azitral
      Azitral 11 February 2016 10: 20
      -1
      "After the collapse of the Soviet Union, everything collapsed ..."
      It was after the collapse of the Russian Empire that everything fell apart. And the Bolsheviks during the First World War, - these are data from a school history textbook of the 70s, - called for "making every effort to defeat tsarism by military means." Being a very Soviet boy, I did not understand and did not accept this even then. What is it like? To kill more Russians? This is done only by traitors from among traitors, many of the tsarist generals mortally offended by the Soviet regime and hating it were still on the side of Russia in 41-45. They were nobler and better than the clique of the infinitely vengeful power-hungry Ulyanov.
  2. avvg
    avvg 11 February 2016 06: 41
    +5
    That's right, we will puff off, the Anglo-Saxons will never leave us alone, we ourselves can destroy ourselves and we can protect ourselves.
  3. Telemon
    Telemon 11 February 2016 06: 42
    +7
    Hello! Well, as the saying goes, "bukaff a lot." About THIS back in 1949 Dulles wrote off in his plan against the USSR. What WE see on Wikipedia (and, as you know, it does not deceive):
    Purpose of this plan allegedly was the destruction of the USSR (Russia - my comment) by propaganda methods aimed at the separation of nationalities and social groups, the loss of traditions, moral values, the moral decay of the country's population ...- A short passage, but very revealing.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 06: 50
      11
      Quote: Telemont
      Well, as the saying goes "bukaff a lot."

      Yeah, and most importantly, they won’t read the article, but everyone will speak out laughing
      1. Telemon
        Telemon 11 February 2016 07: 40
        +7
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Yeah, and most importantly, they won’t read the article, but everyone will speak out

        Yeah, when frankly boring to read. laughing Chitalis-s: The war will end, everything will settle down and settle down. And we will throw everything that we have: all the gold, all the material power to fool and fool people! The human brain, the minds of people are capable of change. Having sowed chaos there, we discreetly replace their values ​​with false ones and force them to believe in these false values. How? We will find our like-minded people, our allies in Russia itself. Episode by episode will be played out with a grandiose scale tragedy of the death of the most rebellious people on earth, the final and irreversible fading of their self-consciousness. For example, from art and literature we will gradually erase its social essence; wean artists and writers - we will discourage them from engaging in the depiction and study of those processes that occur in the depths of the masses. Literature, theaters, cinema - everything will depict and glorify the most base human feelings. We will do our best to support and raise the so-called artists who will instill and hammer into the human mind the cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal - in a word, all immorality. In government, we will create chaos and confusion. We will quietly, but actively and constantly promote tyranny of officials, the prosperity of bribe takers and unscrupulousness. Bureaucracy and red tape will be elevated to virtue. Honesty and decency will be ridiculed and will not be needed by anyone, will turn into a relic of the past. Rudeness and arrogance, lies and deceit, drunkenness and drug addiction, animal fear of each other and shamelessness, betrayal, nationalism and enmity of peoples - first of all, enmity and hatred of the Russian people - we will cultivate all this adroitly and inconspicuously, it will bloom terry color. And only a few, very few will guess or even understand what is happening. But we will put such people in a helpless position, turn them into a laughing stock, find a way to slander them and declare them to be the scum of society. We will dig up spiritual roots, vulgarize and destroy the foundations of popular morality. We will shatter thus, generation after generation. We will take on people from childhood and youth, and we will always make the main bet ON YOUTH - we will decompose, corrupt and corrupt it. We will make cynics, vulgarities and cosmopolitans of it. This is how we do it! - Well, Cho, then continue, or stop ... tongue
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 08: 41
          0
          Quote: Telemont
          Well Cho, then continue, or stop

          Well, great article, you can read.
          1. Telemon
            Telemon 11 February 2016 09: 51
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Well, great article, you can read.

            Yes, for "health" and it went to mind so that, yeah smile :
        2. dengy12
          dengy12 11 February 2016 11: 42
          +1
          Quote: Telemont
          Yeah, when frankly boring to read. laughing Chitalis-s: The war will end, everything will settle down and settle down. And we will throw everything that we have: all the gold, all the material power to fool and fool people! The human brain, the minds of people are capable of change. Having sowed chaos there, we discreetly replace their values ​​with false ones and force them to believe in these false values. How? We will find our like-minded people, our allies in Russia itself. Episode by episode will be played out with a grandiose scale tragedy of the death of the most rebellious people on earth, the final and irreversible fading of their self-consciousness. For example, from art and literature we will gradually erase its social essence; wean artists and writers - we will discourage them from engaging in the depiction and study of those processes that occur in the depths of the masses. Literature, theaters, cinema - everything will depict and glorify the most base human feelings. We will do our best to support and raise the so-called artists who will instill and hammer into the human mind the cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal - in a word, all immorality. In government, we will create chaos and confusion. We will quietly, but actively and constantly promote tyranny of officials, the prosperity of bribe takers and unscrupulousness. Bureaucracy and red tape will be elevated to virtue. Honesty and decency will be ridiculed and will not be needed by anyone, will turn into a relic of the past. Rudeness and arrogance, lies and deceit, drunkenness and drug addiction, animal fear of each other and shamelessness, betrayal, nationalism and enmity of peoples - first of all, enmity and hatred of the Russian people - we will cultivate all this adroitly and inconspicuously, it will bloom terry color. And only a few, very few will guess or even understand what is happening. But we will put such people in a helpless position, turn them into a laughing stock, find a way to slander them and declare them to be the scum of society. We will dig up spiritual roots, vulgarize and destroy the foundations of popular morality. We will shatter thus, generation after generation. We will take on people from childhood and youth, and we will always make the main bet ON YOUTH - we will decompose, corrupt and corrupt it. We will make cynics, vulgarities and cosmopolitans of it. This is how we do it! - Well Cho, then continue, or stop ... tongue

          This is a respected, not Dulles' plan, but a quote from the book "At the Black Knights" by the Soviet writer Yu.P. Dold-Mikhalik.
          I must say smart was a man as he looked into the water
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. EvgNik
        EvgNik 11 February 2016 08: 12
        +7
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Yeah, and most importantly, she won’t read the article, but everyone will speak out

        The article will be read by someone who is interested in this topic, whom it affects, who has already comprehended what is written in it. Personally, I read it very carefully. And I think that "bukaf" is not enough. There are still unaddressed issues.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 08: 40
          +1
          Quote: EvgNik
          The article will be read by someone who is interested in this topic.

          As practice shows, 90% of Saitas read the headline, the first and last paragraphs. And such long ones are generally 1%. And you see this 1%.
    2. EvgNik
      EvgNik 11 February 2016 08: 05
      +7
      Quote: Telemont
      What WE see on Wikipedia (and as you know, it does not deceive

      It also deceives how. It is not for nothing that it was created in such a way that the data laid out in it can be adjusted.
      1. Telemon
        Telemon 11 February 2016 08: 10
        +1
        Quote: EvgNik
        Deceives and how.

        I agree with you, but I am with a MORE share of sarcasm, so to speak. hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Azitral
      Azitral 11 February 2016 10: 23
      +2
      How many times can a cheap Dulles Plan fake be denied? From the first phrase, you can see the style of some district committee instructor. It does not reach the regional committee.
      1. EwgenyZ
        EwgenyZ 11 February 2016 11: 28
        +1
        Azitral
        How many times can a cheap Dulles Plan fake be denied?

        Well, it happens ... The main thing is well said, and there is someone to "translate the arrows", Dulles is to blame, period.
        1. Telemon
          Telemon 11 February 2016 13: 03
          0
          Quote: EwgenyZ
          Well, it happens ... The main thing is well said, and there is someone to "translate the arrows", Dulles is to blame, period.

          Well, everything in Dulles, everything is much "easier", if you have time, please:
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0-AXjJ4MZk, - I would gladly raise it, but because of dementia I can’t in the form of a video. Do not consider it work. Take a look. But it didn’t work out:
  4. Leprekon
    Leprekon 11 February 2016 06: 42
    +7
    War, but war, nothing is as expensive as your own stupidity! That is why the priority of confronting these threats depends - one should not be afraid of external information threats, but put the complex formation of the personality of the younger generation as the main priority of the entire system of education and upbringing.
    Sometimes new, this is the forgotten old.
    1. cap
      cap 11 February 2016 06: 53
      +2
      Quote: Leprechaun
      War, but war, nothing is as expensive as your own stupidity! That is why the priority of confronting these threats depends - one should not be afraid of external information threats, but put the complex formation of the personality of the younger generation as the main priority of the entire system of education and upbringing.
      Sometimes new, this is the forgotten old.


      Tongue removed. +.
  5. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 06: 45
    +2
    there were such personalities as Georg Ots, Muslim Magomayev, Aida Vedishcheva, Yevgeny Martynov and a whole galaxy of outstanding musicians and personalities.
    I won’t read it here or here. A man under 70 and this music of his generation. Young people will not listen to such music, I did not listen to it, and our children today no longer listen to Tsoi or Nautilus. So it has been from generation to generation.
    And youngsters like to listen to Bilan’s fagot, let them listen.
    Although I would have gathered all the pop music in one hut, doused it with gasoline and burned it. Kirkorov was the first!
    Author Comrade Glebov
    Ah, the communist is clear. There was such a singer, Lyubov Orlova, why her author does not consider it great. It is a shame you should be in front of the party.
    1. Flinky
      Flinky 11 February 2016 06: 52
      +5
      Orlova is not a great singer. And not even a great actress, for that matter. But at one time she shot gorgeous.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 07: 25
        -2
        Quote: Flinky
        Orlova is not a great singer.

        And for me, the above are also not great. I won’t even listen to them. They are not my generation hi
      2. Azitral
        Azitral 11 February 2016 10: 26
        0
        And she’s not, God knows what a beauty. Nowadays, nine out of ten girls are prettier. Yes, even without makeup.
    2. 34 region
      34 region 11 February 2016 07: 46
      +1
      Romanov! 06.45. If the songs of the 50s are already so old, then how are the songs in 2 thousand years? And after all they are sung by many, and young! And stories that are 2 years old are also constantly being told.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 08: 38
          +1
          Quote: 34 region
          then how are songs at 2 thousand years old?

          Sing me a song that is 2 years old.
          Quote: 34 region
          And after all they are sung by many, and young!

          Yes, damn it, let me listen.
          Quote: 34 region
          And stories that are 2 years old are also constantly being told.

          I heard stories, but I appeal to you with songs. Give the track.
          1. 34 region
            34 region 11 February 2016 09: 02
            -1
            Romanov! 08.38. Just do not play the fool. Take any religion. How many years have these couplets been singing there?
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 09: 28
              +1
              Quote: Region 34
              Take any religion. How many years have these couplets been singing there?

              And what does the psalm have to do with it, I ask for songs.
              1. 34 region
                34 region 11 February 2016 09: 56
                +2
                Romanov! 09.28. Why are psalms not songs? Today rap sing and listen. And there seems to be no melody there. Only the little thing. And how then do psalms differ from rap? It seems that the meaning is in the text, but there is no melody. hi
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 09: 59
                  0
                  Quote: Region 34
                  . Why are psalms not songs?

                  Yeah ...... No comments.
                  Quote: Region 34
                  Today rap sing and listen. And there seems to be no melody there. Only the little thing. And how then do psalms differ from rap

                  You respected such nonsense write that I am in touch.
                  1. 34 region
                    34 region 11 February 2016 10: 22
                    0
                    Romanov! 09.59. Well! Either the songs of the 50s are not the same, then the millennia. Or do not sing in churches (or churches)? Well no. They sing. There is a choir of singers. So what's the stupid thing?
              2. Telemon
                Telemon 11 February 2016 09: 59
                +2
                Sir, well, you are a dirty trick, the right word. negative
      2. Azitral
        Azitral 11 February 2016 10: 28
        +1
        And young people listen beautifully to Bach, Albenoni and Mozart. For some reason, Beethoven is not in trend.
  6. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 11 February 2016 06: 50
    +2
    Market economy. Our filmmakers look west, as if they would like, grab the dough from them, maybe they can stroke the head and give some tin prize for 30 pieces of silver.
  7. venaya
    venaya 11 February 2016 06: 50
    +8
    The topic is complex and too comprehensive, it is difficult for the author to fully describe it in full, but I would not criticize him, he poses questions that are too overwhelming.
    1. cap
      cap 11 February 2016 07: 11
      -1
      Quote: venaya
      The topic is complex and too comprehensive, it is difficult for the author to fully describe it in full, but I would not criticize him, he poses questions that are too overwhelming.


      "The press has lived for many decades with its tongue stuck in its ass. And someone has thrust it into its own, and someone else's. When the tongue was allowed to be taken out, it turned out that nothing good could be said with it."
      Source: http://www.aphorisme.ru/by-authors/mihalkov/?q=7718&p=1

      I do not like this author (aphorism), but as a comment to the author (article) is suitable.
  8. Yak28
    Yak28 11 February 2016 06: 52
    16
    In the case of a big war, it seems to me that Russia has the weakest point is the lack of human resources, and there is no common idea or goal that will unite people of different social classes, but essentially class enemies. I will say for those who don’t He knows that the Soviet Union didn’t collapse, but the leadership of the country, led by Gorbachev. The collapse of Russia, the army, the disruption of the country's defense, the collapse of medicine, education, was also not done by NATO. And the country's leadership, headed by Yeltsin. The most interesting thing is that no one punished, not convicted and not responsible Tweenness for the deed
    1. Wheel
      Wheel 11 February 2016 13: 25
      +1
      Quote: Yak28
      , collapse of medicine, education, also did not NATO. and the country's leadership, headed by Yeltsin.

      No, well, what a short memory people have!
      Naturally, EBN has done so much that it doesn’t seem to be enough, but still it’s not comme il faut to hang on him the sins of others.
      If anyone has forgotten. Let me remind you that the USE began to be introduced in 2001, and the health care "reform" program was adopted on December 29, 2005.
      Who taxied in those years - ask Wikipedia.
  9. sv-georgij
    sv-georgij 11 February 2016 06: 59
    +4
    No one is going to just mince the current. It is a lot of autumn and very true. Indeed, there is a lot of rubbish in our art and mediocrity rules the ball there. And I'm already sick of various entertaining shows there. But I just don’t watch them now, and I watch TV from time to time because there’s nothing to watch. Read modern waste paper, too, do not want to. Yes, I read this literature and forgot what it was about. Leaves absolutely nothing.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 11 February 2016 08: 41
      +1
      Quote: sv-georgij
      Yes, I read this literature and forgot what it was about. Leaves absolutely nothing.

      Why not? Anyone who wants to find a good book will always find it. I can recommend Alexey Ivanov. For those who are not in the subject - a film based on his book "The Geographer Drank the Globe" with Khabensky. But the book is much more interesting than the movie. Ivanov's other books are no less interesting.
  10. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 11 February 2016 06: 59
    +5
    Oh, how many letters, but thesis, not destiny? Who argues that a war is being waged against Russia and not only (global trend) in the cultural, informational, and other sectors? Nobody! "Exceptional owners of Wall Street", literate people are not needed, they are difficult to manage. And the entire elite, including the Russian one, was formed in the 90s, again by the same "masters". Here they are, in various economic forums, and show their true colors. Now about playing off peoples, well, you my friend, this is their motto, which they openly express - divide et impera! (Divide and rule).
  11. inkass_98
    inkass_98 11 February 2016 07: 05
    14
    I read it, mastered it and, as they say, got a double impression. On the one hand, everything is clear, everything was good before (I almost agree), but now everything is the same bad (I also agree in many ways). I also agree with the lack of a purposeful state educational policy in cinema. For the rest - sorry, sir. If you do not like a theater director - do not go to his performances, do not pay money for his "work", so there will be no performances of him. For a long time I have not organically digested Viktyuk with his delights, but I don’t go and watch his performances.
    And about Mikhalkov and Fedya Bondarchuk I will say this: they are talented people, you cannot take this away from them with all your desire. Fedya is an excellent actor, but you can't let him get close to directing. And Nikita Sergeevich just became a star, he was a poser in Soviet times, and now it's even more so. But he is also a great actor and almost a brilliant director. But only his talent for peaceful purposes, and not for achieving the next Oscar, will not be given any more.
    As for the music - who like pop, who popey, and who popova daughter. Do not like it - do not listen, look for your ideals. I don’t listen to the current pop music either, so my children don’t perceive it, as well as the chanson.
    Bottom line - you can not teach everyone to live according to one pattern, the times are not the same. And public policy should be, but not in the form of shafts and ruts, but in the form of targeted sponsorship of art trends aimed at maintaining the existing policy of preserving Russia's traditional values, family, history and culture. And they will break through themselves, without them it still can not do.
    1. xorgi
      xorgi 11 February 2016 08: 45
      +1
      Purely out of interest, personally for yourself, by what criteria do you evaluate the genius of director Mikhalkov?
    2. Azitral
      Azitral 11 February 2016 10: 40
      +1
      F. Bondarchuk is very, very fond of scolding liberals. Such refined connoisseurs, I, too, was led, and then I just watched the "Inhabited Island" and "9th company" and so on - yes, normal films! Maybe not masterpieces, but nothing disgusting and especially vulgar. You can watch some episodes.
      And Mikhalkov's "Citadel", of course, is monstrous.
  12. Ivan Tucha
    Ivan Tucha 11 February 2016 07: 05
    -3
    The author, each military unit had a couple of, or even more, of its girls of easy virtue. So it’s not necessary to drive Fedya B. You see either the military unit wasn’t very special or something was wrong with you if you didn’t hear about it or didn’t try it.
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 11 February 2016 07: 41
      0
      Quote: Ivan Tucha
      The author, each military unit had a couple of, or even more, of its girls of easy virtue. So it’s not necessary to drive Fedya B. You see either the military unit wasn’t very special or something was wrong with you if you didn’t hear about it or didn’t try it.

      Have you tried it? I met a venereologist? Well, now, hero fool .
  13. Sirocco
    Sirocco 11 February 2016 07: 12
    +6
    Well, I read the article, in general, what the author writes about is the secret of the Opener, about which we have repeatedly spoken out here. I will say briefly, the problem we have in Culture, and Education, as there is neither one nor the other, and about this we have greased the language in VO, but things are still there.
    I think it is necessary for our deputies to give such a read more often, and to dip their faces in the pot with their faces. Maybe something will move. In general, I agree with many of the author. In what is not. Well this is his right and look. Especially closer to the end of the article, as according to Stirlitz, about the most important thing at the end of the article. Putin dunk into the pot turned out.
    The question remained open, what should we do with all this? A rich country, as a historical culture, spiritual, and we fall downhill. He remembered the elite about our business, and remembered the city where he spent his childhood and youth. This is the church of the merchant Golubitsky, this was the lyceum of such a merchant, this is the store of such a merchant, and this is the school of such a merchant. What does a modern merchant boast ?????
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 11 February 2016 10: 23
      +2
      The current one boasts the largest yacht, the longest-legged or "star" wife, a football club, or, finally, a moron son or a drug addict daughter who study over the hill.
  14. Million
    Million 11 February 2016 07: 12
    +5
    Now all over the world something is going wrong with culture
  15. Neophyte
    Neophyte 11 February 2016 07: 13
    +2
    Article plus! The author correctly emphasized, and the picture on zombies with adaptations for zombies is very accurate! Many conclusions require a detailed
    elaboration, but the degradation of our society is evident! I want to believe that not everything is lost and there is a chance to wake up!
  16. Nehist
    Nehist 11 February 2016 07: 16
    +7
    There is no state without ideology, contrary to the shameful article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Simply, if there is no state-folk ideology, then there is anti-people’s (C)
    A short and succinct phrase of which the author had to finish the article, there is nothing to add to this
    1. xorgi
      xorgi 11 February 2016 09: 10
      +1
      Minus from me, I do not agree with "if there is no state-people's ideology, then there is an anti-popular one." This is all the more wrong in relation to our country. Even if the state is against us, even if we are under the citizenship of another state, there is still something elusive in us, some kind of core. This allows us not to bend under oppression, it is thanks to this that we do not dissolve in the cultural mass of other peoples. It is this elusiveness that makes us fight the occupation. This is what the people's ideology is, our worldview, and it cannot be eradicated from us.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik 11 February 2016 10: 31
        +1
        Quote: xorgi
        This is the people's ideology, our worldview and it cannot be etched from us

        You write about popular ideology, and Nehist, to which you put a minus, about state. Agree that these are all different concepts.
  17. shinobi
    shinobi 11 February 2016 07: 21
    0
    When Pompeii was dug up, an inscription was read on one of the walls of his coliseum-Not that youth went!

    If we consider the phenomena from the author’s point of view, I partially agree with it, the Russian Empire finally lost the cultural war in the 17th year. The rest of the consequences are still being scooped up by descendants. But this is if we take Russia away from everyone. And this is not so. The problem of losing cultural identity and succession of generations is observed everywhere around the world, especially pronounced in large multinational countries. The root of the problem in the process of globalization, imposed by transnational corporations and capital m. There is already a solution to the problem, as an example of Japan or China. The bad thing is that in Russia the old original culture was almost completely destroyed and its particles remained only in the disappearing rural outback.
  18. Humpty
    Humpty 11 February 2016 07: 22
    +5
    About the culture of Chinese television - they have been running a series about the war for 10 years - Santa Barbara is also crying. The characters are a couple of generals and a support group, a dozen young Chinese women in uniform.

    In Mutovsk, rear-wheel drive youth organizations oversee and fund American volunteers, the Dutch used to be in charge.

    Now about friendship between peoples, what does a separate national "cultural elite" think about it, admire:
    “Kyrgyz girls marry men of different nationalities, and Kyrgyz guys also get married [to different]. It’s the same as a lion cub marrying a jackal or a jackal marrying a lioness ”- the chairman of the National Union of Writers, public figure and poet Abdrakhman Alymbaev compared representatives of non-Kyrgyz nationalities with jackals.
    This poet and activist was still grinding a lot of things, they even scolded him a little for that.
    Collected into a comment a bunch of things little by little. Like the article can be read diagonally.
  19. beer-youk
    beer-youk 11 February 2016 08: 16
    +6
    The author overestimated his strength and decided to embrace the immensity. The topic is crucial - no doubt about it. But everything turned out too much: wordy, emotional, fragmentary and haphazard. Therefore, almost like in the Soviet school for an essay - the main idea - "+", its presentation - "-".
  20. Ogogoshka
    Ogogoshka 11 February 2016 08: 20
    +1
    Good article, sobering, merge unfortunately.
  21. EvgNik
    EvgNik 11 February 2016 08: 32
    +1
    My wife had a period - she read love affairs and chivalry, Dontsova too. But it was quite short. And as a biblioman, I myself formed the tastes of both wives and children. Everyone, of course, has different preferences, but they always listen to my opinion. And the questions raised in the article are the guarantee of the survival of the Russian people. Incidentally, he noted that Putin’s rating began to fall just after the opening of the center to the shame of Russia. The people are sensitive to such things.
  22. CONTROL
    CONTROL 11 February 2016 08: 32
    +5
    The author, despite the culturological delights - an ordinary, even primitive snob! (Snobbery is a characteristic behavior, way of thinking, manners of an individual claiming to be elitist, consisting in admiration for everything first-class, starting with works of art, ending with clothes, that should characterize an intelligent and educated seasoned person - one of the few.

    Snobbery lies precisely in the fact that a snob appreciates objects and phenomena not for their quality, but only because these objects and phenomena are appreciated by representatives of the elite, to whom the snob wants to be involved. Snobbery differs from hypocrisy in that the snob, not fully aware of himself, sincerely considers himself an intellectual, in which he is convinced by the manners and tastes of the snob.
    )

    ... only - when the "elite" is divided into "our elite" and - "their cesspool"! ... our scouts and their spies ... our interrogators and their executioners ...
    Kulturtreger! ... Do not like it - do not look! if you don’t feel like it - don’t read ... don’t like it - don’t listen!
    (by the way, all my life - long enough, before "retirement" - I could not stand Tolstoy, who is Leo; he always seemed to me a hypocrite! and over the years he only strengthened in this attitude of mine towards him! Yes, let's say, Chekhov is a jerk and "super-pseudo-intellectual" with the same set of complexes - Haruki Murakami nervously smokes on the sidelines ...
    ... Well, discuss the literary, as well as the cinematic ... pictorial and sculptural
    oh ... pop ... theatrical ... etc ....- preferences, in other words - tastes, occupation at least - ungrateful! ...
    ... Are you crazy about Berlin;
    I prefer Medyn.
    You, my friend, and bitter horseradish - raspberries,
    And to me and Blanmange - wormwood! ...
    Art has never been crammed into any framework, under any - dictatorial-totalitarian, gay-lesbo-democratic ... and any kind of government and state system - it was (and will be) "free" from everything! sometimes - from the norms of morality ...
    (at the dawn of "perestroika", a story caught my eye - not a story, a short story? ... but no ... with the name "Mahrot of All Russia" ... Well, what is this for you? How to evaluate THIS? name...)
    In general - empty talk, taste; "bazaar about nothing" ...
    1. Mr. Pip
      Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 23
      0
      Quote: CONTROL
      Art never and nobody managed to push into any framework

      It was a success under Nazism.
      Do you remember the cultural heritage that Nazi Germany left us, its literature, cinema, music (well, except for one old song)? No? And here I am about the same thing! fellow
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL 11 February 2016 12: 39
        0
        Quote: Mr PIP
        Quote: CONTROL
        Art never and nobody managed to push into any framework

        It was a success under Nazism.
        Do you remember the cultural heritage that Nazi Germany left us, its literature, cinema, music (well, except for one old song)? No? And here I am about the same thing! fellow

        Lena Riefenstahl - with his anthem of Nazi Germany! - for example ... Manna (brotherly) ... too ... Here our Roman Carmen and Grossman - fell behind ...
        And in our country we are not familiar with the culture of Germany of that period - for obvious reasons!
        1. Mr. Pip
          Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 13: 21
          0
          Quote: CONTROL
          with your Nazi Germany anthem!

          Well, who in the 21st century, besides idealizing Nazism, is interested in listening to this "biliberday"?
          And in general, where is the world culture against the Nazi who sought to destroy it, it’s really laughing
          I'd rather dance to "hava nagila", dancing is still more fun than marching to Nazi marches.
          1. CONTROL
            CONTROL 11 February 2016 14: 59
            0
            Quote: Mr PIP
            Quote: CONTROL
            with your Nazi Germany anthem!

            Well, who in the 21st century, besides idealizing Nazism, is interested in listening to this "biliberday"?
            And in general, where is the world culture against the Nazi who sought to destroy it, it’s really laughing
            I'd rather dance to "hava nagila", dancing is still more fun than marching to Nazi marches.

            ... who is closer! and sweeter ... And even the anthem of Russia performed by Penkin ... or the Mummy of the troll!
          2. CONTROL
            CONTROL 11 February 2016 15: 10
            0
            Quote: Mr PIP
            Quote: CONTROL
            with your Nazi Germany anthem!

            Well, who in the 21st century, besides idealizing Nazism, is interested in listening to this "biliberday"?
            ... than marching under Nazi marches.

            Lena Riefenstahl (lady, by the way) - filmmaker and photographer; and by the way - after all, the heritage of world culture! ...
      2. CONTROL
        CONTROL 11 February 2016 14: 57
        0
        Quote: Mr PIP
        Quote: CONTROL
        Art never and nobody managed to push into any framework

        It was a success under Nazism.
        Do you remember the cultural heritage that Nazi Germany left us, its literature, cinema, music (well, except for one old song)? No? And here I am about the same thing! fellow

        ... by the way, about the birds: the national anthem of one oh-oh-oh-very familiar, maybe even union (former!) republic - the slammed "Horst Wessel" ... even me, with my "bear-ears", and then - understood ...
  23. sergo1914
    sergo1914 11 February 2016 08: 53
    +3
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    there were such personalities as Georg Ots, Muslim Magomayev, Aida Vedishcheva, Yevgeny Martynov and a whole galaxy of outstanding musicians and personalities.
    I won’t read it here or here. A person under 70 is also the music of his generation. Young people will not listen to such music,I did not listen to her


    Listens to the youth of all of the above. And Mr. X also looks. Rarely, however, show. So no one has canceled torrents yet. As for the last sentence ... That explains a lot.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 09: 42
      +1
      Quote: sergo1914
      Listens to the youth of all of the above.

      Well, the paper will endure everything. You can write. Whatever you want.
      Quote: sergo1914
      As for the last sentence ... That explains a lot.

      And what does this explain? Your attempt to humiliate it somehow did not pass, because each generation listens to its own music. Conduct a survey among young people who Georgy Ots is and if one out of 100 says it right, let us assume that you are right.
      Well, I just believe in miracles.
      1. Mr. Pip
        Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 26
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        who is George Ots and if one out of 100 says it right.

        I know that my wife's alarm clock has a song "the best day" - this is probably the only thing that can wake me up without a fight before 8-00 request
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 11 February 2016 11: 48
          0
          Quote: Mr. PIP

          I know my wife has the best day song on her alarm clock

          Ahahahaha wassat wassat wassat
  24. Mantykora
    Mantykora 11 February 2016 09: 13
    +5
    From the article:
    And then what are they reading? And now we are supposed to read what is called “best sellers,” that is, to read. what sells well, or, more simply, consumer goods. At the same time, it is sacred to believe that you are becoming more “individual" and unique from this.

    And no one will think that this is an oxymoron - a combination of incongruous. What is it - an adult woman - 40 with more than years - they asked me to drop some books on a freshly bought tablet - I dropped the folder with 200 historical books - I was on my computer, the first thing came to hand. After a few days - everything is boring, I deleted, give love stories. Heck!!! There was no love in history ?!

    About the movie.
    Before you turn on the TV set - there is nothing to watch, after a few years - you turn on the cable - there is nothing to watch, although there are over a hundred channels. Today - turn on the torrent - what's new in the last 1982 hours? - there is NOTHING to watch! Maybe it's not me that harmful, but really there is nothing to watch? The last film that caused at least some emotions is "An Officer and a Citizen" XNUMX. Not a masterpiece, but a couple of normal messages are available. And now you look - there are no special emotions, there is nothing special to remember, or even to look at all is harmful. Is that only a few successful phrases to remember, which is not a sin to insert into life.

    About the music.
    If the song has meaning, good meaning and the message that takes for the soul - it is worth listening to. The standard for me is Vysotsky. And if for two verses, which are about nothing, there are five refrains, then why listen to this?
    1. Mr. Pip
      Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 28
      +1
      Quote: Mantykora
      What is it - an adult woman - over 40 years old

      And these, by the way, are usually read by the Dontsovs and Co. - although they grew up under the "Soviet culture" fellow
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL 11 February 2016 12: 47
        0
        Quote: Mr PIP
        Quote: Mantykora
        What is it - an adult woman - over 40 years old

        And these, by the way, are usually read by the Dontsovs and Co. - although they grew up under the "Soviet culture" fellow

        There is female и man's literature ... and movies ... and ... and ... and even clothes! although THEY - put on pants! And you - a skirt with a blouse ... dare? Well - prettier, such ... That's the same!
        1. Mr. Pip
          Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 13: 28
          +1
          Quote: CONTROL
          although THEY - put on pants! And you - a skirt with a blouse ... dare? well - prettier, such

          No, because I am partly dependent on the "opinion of others" because my well-being partly depends on this "opinion".
          In general, the highlanders of Scotland or the legionnaires of Ancient Rome wore skirts - because of this they ceased to be "men" or what exactly did you want to tell me now, I did not understand you? request
          1. CONTROL
            CONTROL 11 February 2016 15: 03
            0
            Quote: Mr PIP
            Quote: CONTROL
            although THEY - put on pants! And you - a skirt with a blouse ... dare? well - prettier, such

            No, because I am partly dependent on the "opinion of others" because my well-being partly depends on this "opinion".
            In general, the highlanders of Scotland or the legionnaires of Ancient Rome wore skirts - because of this they ceased to be "men" or what exactly did you want to tell me now, I did not understand you? request

            Well, that's what I wanted to say! Every time and place has its own customs, fashions, morals and - aha, art! We all depend on the opinion of the "surrounding" ... except for some - those who nail the scrotum to the pavement with nails! his, by the way ...
            The Dontsovs calculate - and "create" - for a certain category of the public, the Strugatskys - for another; Losev there or Herr Kant or Nietzsche - for the third ... and Murakami - for the shiza! ...
          2. Fat
            Fat 11 February 2016 22: 58
            0
            Quote: Mr. PIP
            In general, the highlanders of Scotland or the legionnaires of Ancient Rome wore skirts - because of this they ceased to be "men" or what exactly did you want to tell me now, I did not understand you?

            A kilt and a tunic are not skirts. Dear Pip. A kilt (by the way, it is worn over the legs) is a piece of "Big kilt" for example. This garment, known by many other names (Great Plaid, Feileadh Mor, Breacan Feile, Belted Plaid), is essentially two pieces of thick woolen fabric sewn together. Its length can range from 4,5 to 9 yards (approximately 4,1-8,2 m), but the most common length is 6-7 yards (5,5-6,5 m). The folds on one part of the fabric were collected by hand and secured with a wide belt. Another part could be thrown over the left shoulder and used as a cloak, or be fastened to a belt, partially falling from it, or cover the shoulders and head in bad weather, and also serve as a blanket at night ... Actually, this is the dress of the Celts. Other modern representatives of the Celtic group - Irish, Welsh, Isle of Man - also adopted the wearing of the kilt (albeit to a lesser extent compared to the Scots).
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 11 February 2016 12: 45
      0
      Quote: Mantykora
      About the movie.
      Previously, you turn on the telly - there is nothing to watch, after a few years - you turn on the cable - there is nothing to watch, although there are a hundred channels. Today - turn on the torrent - what's new in the last day? - watch NOTHING!

      Watch the old American (!!!) TV series "Beyond the Possible". Fun, of course, but - there are also thoughts, at times - even clever thoughts!
      ... Although, of course, they were lying! ... for the amusement of the world bourgeoisie ...
  25. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 11 February 2016 09: 29
    +3
    "let him watch Soviet cinema, so he will develop correctly" ////

    And that's it. The remaining thousand letters of the article are superfluous. laughing
  26. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 11 February 2016 09: 31
    +2
    In short, they took everything on a balalaika, put on a blouse with striped pants and bast shoes, sat in a corner of the hut and strummed, joining our primordial culture. And instead of watching TV, you can watch a splinter in the corner. All of this is very reminiscent of Sorokin's work - an ancient Russia, with a tsar, oprichnina, common people, fenced off from external and cultural influences of the West, but in the 21st century, with cars, airplanes and "far-sightedness" - that is, television. Personally, I really like this idea. But from the outside.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 11 February 2016 10: 42
      +1
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Personally, I really like this idea. But from the side.

      For God's sake, listen to Leps, Mikhailov, Viagra, Pugacheva, Kirkorov. Watch Mikhalkov's films. Zvezdulte with them - and you will be happy.
      1. Mr. Pip
        Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 29
        +1
        Quote: EvgNik
        For God's sake, listen to Leps, Mikhailov, Viagra, Pugacheva, Kirkorov. Watch Mikhalkov's films.

        Who are all these people?! belay
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 11 February 2016 12: 53
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      In short, they took everything on a balalaika, put on a blouse with striped pants and bast shoes, sat in a corner of the hut and strummed, joining our primordial culture. And instead of watching TV, you can watch a splinter in the corner. All of this is very reminiscent of Sorokin's work - an ancient Russia, with a tsar, oprichnina, common people, fenced off from external and cultural influences of the West, but in the 21st century, with cars, airplanes and "far-sightedness" - that is, television. Personally, I really like this idea. But from the outside.

      Degradation! The regression is obvious: what is the TV that our contemporaries sit out after work in apartment buildings, better than a bonfire in the cave, which our ancestors spent the evenings with?
      Yes, worse! Bonfire - it shines and warms! and the television only shines, and even then - on the one hand ...
      1. Mr. Pip
        Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 13: 30
        0
        Quote: CONTROL
        The regression is obvious: what is the TV that our contemporaries sit out after work in apartment buildings, better than a bonfire in the cave, which our ancestors spent the evenings with?

        Indeed, throw the computer into a fire, let it not only shine for you, but also warm it! good
  27. capitosha1rang
    capitosha1rang 11 February 2016 09: 42
    +4
    The author "digs deeply" (one of the characters in this Gaidaev film "12 chairs" seems to have said so).
    And how can one disagree with him, when everything described here it is - before our eyes, and above all "cinema is the most accessible art for the masses", which has turned into DYNASTIC KIBENEMATOGRAPH
    Why is there Indian cinema in India? Is it Chinese in China?
    But in Russia - the movie is not Russian. Why?
    Maybe because they took up a perimeter defense and stand to the death, not letting the "outsiders" go to the trough, fresh blood artistic, directorial, singing and other dynasties Messrs. Mikhalkovs - Evstigneevs - Pugachevs - Efremovs - Lazarevs - Presnyakovs - Ledogorovs - Samoilovs - Vertinsky - Malikovs - Bondarchukov - Zakharovs - Innocents - Slavazaytsovys - Tabakovs - Menglets - Chirkovs - Raikinsky - Pyuhovy - Dzyovyh Dzyrovs - Pykhovykh Dizov - Dzyrovyh Dizy - Dzyrovyh Dizy - Dyuvyi Dzyrovy - Dzyovyh - Razhovyh - Dzyovy - Dzyovy - Dzyovyh Dzyrovy - Kozakovs - Etush - Konchalovsky ...
    1. Mr. Pip
      Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 48
      0
      Quote: capitosha1rang
      But in Russia - the movie is not Russian. Why?

      Because in Russia, Russian cinema is FACT yes
      If in doubt, take an interest in watching our films in the USA or Korea, by the way, for comparison, watch films from Korean cinema - I can recommend director Pak Chan Uk as more or less European, questions will disappear right away!
  28. ASK505
    ASK505 11 February 2016 09: 46
    +2
    In general, everything is correct. What’s called boiling. What to do? The task of the state: to teach, treat and protect. If with the latter things have started to get better, then with the first two, work is no end or trouble. Cause? See the root. The reason for all the troubles and upheavals in one question. Who owns private ownership of the means of production? From the Internet: 110 people in Russia hold in their hands 35% of national wealth, which they do not belong to either conscience or the Constitution. This is the highest level of inequality in the world, with the exception of a few small islands in the Caribbean. Promises: “Factories - to the workers, land - to the peasants" remained on paper. Planted on a raw material needle. The article is a cry of the soul, but we don’t need the orange trouble. This we have already passed.

    Pops has always been. “Like a verse without a thought in a fashionable song, The winter road is smooth ...” A.S. Pushkin in his great Eugene Onegin.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 11 February 2016 11: 10
      0
      Quote: ASK505
      Pops has always been.

      Popsa has always been, that's for sure. only one but... What remains of her over time. At one time, both Mozart and Strauss were considered low-quality, but they still sound. At one time Maya Kristalinskaya was scolded for the song "I could run around the corner" (a line from the song, I don't remember the name). It seems to be the construction of the song as it is now, a verse of three identical lines and one ending. A simple song, but how many feelings! And pain, and bitterness, and resentment, and love. And in the present - only instincts, and nothing more. Who will listen to them in 20 years, especially in 100. Now the young people do not know many of those who sang 20 years ago
  29. ARES623
    ARES623 11 February 2016 09: 48
    -1
    The article is so-so. Reflections about nothing. The author does not want to dig deep, and therefore does not establish a cause-and-effect relationship. I believe that it is possible to attach to any cultural heritage only on the basis of general literacy and education. What is the use of offering to read Dostoevsky, if at the time of his study in the secondary school program, the student reads with difficulty? What is the use of leading a person to the theater if, due to the lack of understanding of the rules of behavior, only his presence and behavior interferes with both the audience and the actors? First of all, you need to pay attention to school and family. To help those who want to succeed, ask hard from the negligent, including both teachers and parents. Pupils from elementary school are not taught the right attitude towards each other, cruelty and violence flourish. Nobody cares about this, except for the parents of the victims. The professional skills of an educator and a teacher among teachers of subjects who form a citizen of the country are so low that graduates know only rights, without responsibilities, and they simply hate history. This is where football ultras, fanatical suicides and other nasty things come from. From there, "army hazing" and mercenaries in IS. IMHO
  30. tommy717
    tommy717 11 February 2016 10: 02
    +2
    I can not put + article and I can not put -. Some things are in tune with my idea of ​​today's life, others are the other way around. Incidentally, I, too, am not a fan of the music of Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov and other great composers. I do not digest Bilanov-Nyush. I love melodic and pleasant music, including and western. And he turned to literary classics only in adulthood just to reflect on it a bit (and at school in literature classes they completely repelled the desire to read Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. I just remember the sucking: what did T. Larina think, what character did Bazarov do, what did he do wrong Onegin) I do not want to say that I was a d-league and did not like to read. Quite the opposite was well-read. the literary exam to my teacher’s surprise (and the school head teacher who didn’t give lessons at the exam) took the exam perfectly. But for some reason I love my Motherland. And my children are patriots, despite the fact that they bear the stamp of perestroika time and the dashing 90s. By the way, Mikhalkov is also a multifaceted personality. He can make junk films, and he can touch the thin strings of the soul, including in some Besogon programs. Maybe I'm wrong, but this is my life and my opinion.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 11 February 2016 11: 26
      0
      Quote: tommy717
      I do not want to say that I was a d-league and did not like to read. Quite the opposite was well-read. the literary exam to my teacher’s surprise (and the school head teacher who didn’t give lessons at the exam) took the exam perfectly. But for some reason I love my Motherland

      Why "but"? Everything is correct and quite logical. These books (which we "passed" at school) you then read? At school, I only read the entire Young Guard. The rest are after 30 years. Each book has its own time. And I also watch "Besogon" sometimes. Oh, Nikita Sergeevich is disingenuous, disingenuous. It's just a form of PR and not a painful one.
  31. iury.vorgul
    iury.vorgul 11 February 2016 10: 33
    +5
    I agree with the author's opinion about our cinema. And even the latest, seemingly patriotic films, but still, the directors are trying to put some kind of "guano" in. I recently watched a new film adaptation of "The Dawns Here Are Quiet". I liked it and filmed well, and the patriotic idea is expressed. But ... Here Davletyarov shoots how the "evil NKVDeshniki" repress the family of Liza Brichkina, they are driven into exile. Here are no less "evil NKVDeshniki" arrest Gali Chetvertak's parents and send her to an orphanage. Oooh ... bastards. And then I decided to refresh my memory for myself and re-read the story of Boris Vasiliev, which I had previously read as a child. And that turned out. Brichkina is the daughter of a forester, and there is not the slightest mention of the fact that she is from a dispossessed family. Yes, Chetvertak is an orphanage, but again, nowhere in the text is there the slightest mention of the fact that her parents were repressed. The question is - why did Daletyarov, while shooting "patriotic" films, casually kick a huge layer of our history?
  32. Fat
    Fat 11 February 2016 11: 01
    +1
    I did not like the article by Comrade Glebov. Too superficial and not a single fresh bright thought. So, the "cry of the soul" dissatisfied with the excess of consumer goods in human culture. I do not like it when such "comrades" impose their tastes and worldview on me. They want the best, but it turns out as always, boring, gray, spiteful.
  33. veksha50
    veksha50 11 February 2016 11: 23
    +1
    "I have never come across such people, but I have never seen anyone read Tolstoy, Pushkin, Turgenev or Dostoevsky. Our Russian classics, or rather, not like this, but like this: our Russian classic, has become "irrelevant"" ...

    Unfortunately, this is a cruel truth ...
    The other day, I found on the Internet and re-read the collection of Victor Afanasyev, a prose writer Soviet times, praising Russian nature and people "Tsar-Fish" ... I can not say that there are now writers who write in the same way as Astafiev ...
    The same Shukshin ... There are no writers who kindly educate on seemingly insignificant works a feeling of love for their country and its people ...

    Well, after all, modern youth will not read such things, will not !!! And so Tolstoy-Dostoevsky - even more so ...

    And with movies the same rubbish ... It seems that a decision was made at the level of the Government - to shoot patriotic films, but sometimes they distort them beyond recognition and stupidity ...

    And what to do with all this ???
  34. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 11 February 2016 11: 39
    0
    The topic of course is too big to cover in one article. I believe that the author simply expressed his opinion and deserves respect for this already. Basically, I agree with the author, but you can’t do with classics and your favorite Soviet films in raising children.
  35. Mr. Pip
    Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 11: 44
    +1
    Dear comrade Glebov, do you have difficulties with children or grandchildren or what ?! Why do you have such a break with the young generation, they should be your relatives - with a common language for you request
    Here I am "a little old" and I grew up on films with Schwarzenegger, Jackie Chan, Bruce Lee and other stupid films with stupid actors, I watched no less stupid cartoons about "Beavis and Bathhet" and listened almost all my life to mostly stupid "punk rock" well, or then metal and all metal wassat
    As a result, I am a candidate of sciences, I have a family, we do not drink, do not use drugs and we generally live well in the Russian Federation, and on top of that, I am "for some reason" a PATRIOT of Russia!
    And I'm not the only one, almost all of my peer friends are like that - maybe you, the author, are doing a little the wrong thing and not thinking about that?
    Maybe you want the reconstruction of Nazism in Russia, with the prohibition first of the wrong music, and then the wrong people? fellow
  36. triglav
    triglav 11 February 2016 12: 11
    0
    And it all started with the fact that they ruined our classical education. Now all sorts of USE ... Do not read young people. And if he reads, then all the Western crap. Not a classic. And the films are made mostly action-like. In schools they teach in such a way that one wonders. Here VVP recently said that the national idea is patriotism. This is, of course, correct. But then bring back the quality of education. For children to study the history of the country and its literature. Without interruption, as we studied at one time. Then it was clear what time, for example, M.A.Bulgakov wrote about in "White Guard". Now children don't even know about it. Geography should be taught in such a way that children are interested. And be sure to talk about our outstanding scientists, seafarers, discoverers. And our children should watch domestic cartoons. Smart and kind. Not all foreign nonsense. And for this it is necessary to prohibit the main TV channels from showing any imported nonsense. Precisely to ban! And those guilty of the violation - mercilessly fire! These are the enemies of our children. And that means - and ours. And all this should be headed by the Minister of Education. And for this, there must be a reliable person in office with appropriate powers from the Prime Minister and the President. And the prime minister must be pro-Russian. And the whole government.
    1. Mr. Pip
      Mr. Pip 11 February 2016 12: 26
      0
      Quote: triglav
      And the films are mostly action-like.

      Are we on the Military Site or what ?! Here, probably EVERYONE wants to fight NATO in Ukraine and Turkey - but "militants" are bad and immoral request
      1. vladimirw
        vladimirw 11 February 2016 12: 49
        0
        probably it was necessary to put bad action movies!
  37. vladimirw
    vladimirw 11 February 2016 12: 48
    0
    In fact, everything is correct, but long and not readable. But + of course!
  38. Normal ok
    Normal ok 11 February 2016 13: 04
    0
    Quote: gergi
    Loving your country is the main ideology.

    Love for the Motherland - i.e. "patriotism" cannot be an ideology. This is a substitution of concepts. Let me explain. Love is a feeling, but feelings tend to change to the opposite. What we have seen more than once. And "ideology" is a clearly formulated idea, thought. This is not a product of feelings, but of logic and will - i.e. these are beliefs! In addition, patriotism, like other feelings, is experienced by different people in different ways. And there are a great many examples of how patriots killed each other (and at the same time ruined the Motherland) for a different vision of what exactly the Motherland should be. And "ideology" is a clearly formulated vector of development that draws a line between friends and foes. Therefore, loving the Motherland is good, but this is not enough. We need a clear idea of ​​what kind of homeland we want to see. And we need a thoughtful broadcast, transmission of this idea to the next generations. So that the descendants in a dozen years do not begin to "destroy to the ground, and then ..." Formulate the ideology of politics. But the transmission of the idea is, in many ways, a function of culture about the decline of which the author writes. And if the idea is not formulated, then there is nothing to convey. And a holy place is never empty, which we see in the dominance of a third-rate cultural "product".
  39. Whowhy
    Whowhy 11 February 2016 13: 18
    +2
    "Who dines a girl, he dances her" ... What is there to talk about if the state has completely withdrawn itself from the education of young people?
    1. South Ural
      South Ural 11 February 2016 18: 18
      0
      no, it has not eliminated itself, it imposes false two-faced concepts, and through them it changes the consciousness of young people, learning how to reason and think. This is unnecessary ...
    2. TOR2
      TOR2 11 February 2016 19: 45
      +1
      Quote: whowhy
      What can I talk about if the state has completely withdrawn from youth education?

      In some regions, the local authorities went even further.
      https://lenta.ru/articles/2016/02/11/vor/
      It is for such a system of education that a “football team” should be assembled from the proper persons before the shooting wall! am I have no words!!!
  40. South Ural
    South Ural 11 February 2016 18: 16
    +1
    Article with one hundred percent hit the target! Culture, the upbringing system, the system of views on how to develop oneself as a person, society, homeland - all these are fundamental components. Today, sometimes even the most intelligent youth does not know and does not understand the processes in society, their interdependence and mutual influence. That there is only a wording from the 8th grade textbook on social studies about parents, whom this textbook calls "agents of primary socialization." Now we are not dad and mom, but agents. This is where "parent one - parent two" begins and ends !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1. Fat
      Fat 11 February 2016 23: 15
      0
      The origin of the family, private property and the state by Friedrich Engels now does not steer, but in vain. Excellent book, in his youths he read.
  41. Comrade Glebov
    11 February 2016 23: 14
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    there were such personalities as Georg Ots, Muslim Magomayev, Aida Vedishcheva, Yevgeny Martynov and a whole galaxy of outstanding musicians and personalities.
    I won’t read it here or here. A man under 70 and this music of his generation. Young people will not listen to such music, I did not listen to it, and our children today no longer listen to Tsoi or Nautilus. So it has been from generation to generation.
    And youngsters like to listen to Bilan’s fagot, let them listen.
    Although I would have gathered all the pop music in one hut, doused it with gasoline and burned it. Kirkorov was the first!
    Author Comrade Glebov
    Ah, the communist is clear. There was such a singer, Lyubov Orlova, why her author does not consider it great. It is a shame you should be in front of the party.


    I didn't want to leave a comment under my article, but I can't help but make amendments. I am up to 70 still almost 45 years old. If you don't listen to really good music, don't speak for young people. As for the nit-picking with "not mentioning" Lyubov Orlova, I will say this: if you list everyone whom I listen to, then the article will be from the first volume of "War and Peace". hi
  42. Human-dv
    Human-dv 12 February 2016 10: 00
    0
    Good article, I liked it! There is something to think about and something to think about!