In Thailand, denied reports about the intention of the military to buy Russian tanks

73
Thailand is not going to buy Russian yet Tanks T-90, transmits RIA News Statement by the representative of the Ministry of Defense of the country Vinthaya Suvari.

In Thailand, denied reports about the intention of the military to buy Russian tanks


Over the weekend, local media reported on the intention of the Thai Minister of Defense Pravita Wongsuvanva during a visit to Moscow to begin negotiations on the purchase of T-90 tanks.

“Contrary to some Thai media reports, Thailand does not yet have plans to acquire Russian tanks. The fact that the Minister of Defense can inspect Russian tanks during a visit does not mean that he is going to sign a contract for their purchase. This will be an introductory inspection, ”said Suvari.

Earlier it was reported about the interest of the Thai military to the Russian and Chinese tanks in connection with the delay in the supply of Ukrainian "stronghold". The contract with Ukraine provides for the supply of 50 machines, but for the year 2 only 10 units were supplied.
  • RIA News. Ramil Sitdikov
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    8 February 2016 17: 59
    And that is true. What for them are non-kosher tanks? Better without them at all than to displease the empire of good. Cheaper to lose the war. At a minimum, the elite will not lose deposits in American banks.
    1. +2
      8 February 2016 18: 00
      The contract with Ukraine provides for the supply of 50 cars, but only 2 units were delivered in 10 years.

      Well, so long as they reach their speed! smile How many days did Ukrainian cars get to China - in Kazakhstan they got lost, and then Taiwan. smile
      1. +5
        8 February 2016 18: 03
        Quote: SRC P-15
        The contract with Ukraine provides for the supply of 50 cars, but only 2 units were delivered in 10 years.

        Well, so long as they reach their speed!

        On the new Ukrainian silk road, through China smile
        1. +1
          8 February 2016 18: 04
          Awesome trip will be. More abruptly the same cartoon. The comedy films shot on this occasion will have a preamble: Based on real events.
      2. +3
        8 February 2016 19: 56
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        and here is Taiwan

        And then Thailand! Taiwan is a completely different place! hi
      3. +1
        8 February 2016 21: 32
        Taki Thailand, not Taiwan! :)
    2. +9
      8 February 2016 18: 01
      Quote: Pereira
      What for them tanks?

      Thais are naive people, everyone hopes to see "Strongholds". smile
      1. +4
        8 February 2016 18: 57
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Thais are naive people, everyone hopes to see "Strongholds".

        Duc, sort of seen already (and use a little).
        well, though not all of the "Oplots" have "arrived" yet request . it happens... winked

    3. 0
      8 February 2016 18: 12
      Quote: Pereira
      And that is true. Nafig them not kosher ...

      compete who will jump further
    4. +7
      8 February 2016 18: 13
      Quote: Pereira
      Cheaper to lose the war.

      And what tanks ended in Thailand? And what kind of war?
      1. 0
        8 February 2016 18: 17
        In fact, they have graters with their neighbors for many years because of the local temple complex.
        1. +1
          8 February 2016 18: 28
          Quote: Pereira
          In fact, they have graters with their neighbors for many years because of the local temple complex.

          And how many tanks were lost in these graters? In the last ten years?



          Oplot-M Flag of Ukraine.svg Ukraine Main battle tank 11[1][1] [2] 49 ordered
          М60А1 Flag of the United States.svg USA Main battle tank 53[2]
          М60А3 Flag of the United States.svg USA Main battle tank 125[2]
          Type 69 Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg PRC Main battle tank 50[2] in storage
          М48А5 Flag of the United States.svg USA medium tank 105[2]
          M41 Walker Bulldog Flag of the United States.svg USA light tank 24[2]
          FV101 Scorpion Flag of the United Kingdom.svg Great Britain light tank 104[2] 50 in storage
          Stingray Flag of the United States.svg USA light tank 66[2]


          50 Strongholds they will receive in a couple of years.
          1. 0
            8 February 2016 19: 17
            So what? Do you need tanks? I did not understand the message.
            1. +1
              8 February 2016 20: 00
              Quote: Pereira
              So what? Do you need tanks? I did not understand the message.

              Quote: Pereira
              Cheaper to lose the war.

              What war to lose? How fast did BTT decline?
          2. +7
            8 February 2016 19: 30
            Quote: Kars
            50 Strongholds they will receive in a couple of years.

            This is at a rate of 5 tanks per year in the domesticated Ukraine ...
            With all due respect to you, Kars, Ukraine’s fulfillment of this order is highly questionable, and its implementation current Ukraine is generally seen as something fantastic ...
            1. +1
              8 February 2016 20: 03
              Quote: Albert1988
              With all due respect to you, Kars, the fulfillment by Ukraine of this order is highly questionable, and the fulfillment of it by the current Ukraine seems to be somehow fantastic ...

              After all, are these the problems of the Thais? The contract, despite a bunch of stuffing, has not been canceled, although this is at least the second time that the well-known resources are selling Russian BTGs to Thais instead of strongholds.
              1. +4
                8 February 2016 20: 33
                Quote: Kars
                Are these the problems of Thais?

                Yes, in many respects these are problems of Thais - because to contact or not to contact a problem supplier is entirely on the customer’s conscience.
                As the saying goes "you wouldn't be chasing, pop ..."
                And most importantly, the fact that the contract has not yet been terminated does not mean that Ukraine will fulfill it within an acceptable period ...
                1. +3
                  8 February 2016 20: 36
                  Quote: Albert1988
                  As the saying goes "you wouldn't be chasing, pop ..."

                  What exactly did the Thais chase in 2011?
                  Quote: Albert1988
                  contact or not contact the problem provider

                  we also don’t know the financial conditions. But it is clear that there was no full prepayment.
                  1. +3
                    8 February 2016 20: 51
                    Quote: Kars
                    What exactly did the Thais chase in 2011?

                    Figs knows them, although it seems to me that they just wanted to find an alternative supplier of high-quality armored vehicles - it’s kind of like to drive an M-60, it’s expensive to buy an Amer’s new one, but the Ukrainian stronghold, at the stated characteristics, had a very decent price.
                    Quote: Kars
                    we also don’t know the financial conditions. But it is clear that there was no full prepayment.

                    If there was no full prepayment, then Thais can wait for the contract to be completed at least until the second coming, especially if the first 10 tanks have covered at least half of the amount paid.
                    But all these circumstances again do not cancel the main thing - the obvious inability of Ukraine to fulfill the order within an acceptable period of time, maybe they will put 50 strongholds for the Thais ... by the time the stronghold is already outdated.
                    1. +1
                      8 February 2016 20: 58
                      Quote: Albert1988
                      Amer’s new purchase is expensive,

                      4,2 a million dollars for Oplot.b / used abrams can be taken cheaper, like a leopard 2-and not countries like Thailand used leopards take.
                      T-90 is even cheaper. So you need to expand your thought, for what you were chasing, or it will turn out that BM Oplot was taken for characteristics
                      Quote: Albert1988
                      If there was no full prepayment, then Thais can wait for the contract to be completed at least until the second coming

                      If they were, they would have already demanded forfeit.
                      Quote: Albert1988
                      But all these circumstances again do not cancel the main thing - the obvious inability of Ukraine to fulfill the order within an acceptable period of time,

                      there is force majeure, some components were delivered from Crimean enterprises in general.
                      Quote: Albert1988
                      . by the time the stronghold is already outdated.

                      Well, you, vryatli in the Thai habitat in the next 5 years, someone will massively put himself in the Armed Forces of the sun))))
                      1. +3
                        8 February 2016 21: 11
                        Quote: Kars
                        second-hand abrams can be taken cheaper, like a leopard 2 and not countries like Thailand used leopards take.

                        Well, we don't know what the "hot Thai guys" were thinking about, do we? Maybe they just wanted new tanks?
                        Quote: Kars
                        If they were, they would have already demanded forfeit.

                        Well, what am I talking about?
                        Quote: Kars
                        there is force majeure, some components were delivered from Crimean enterprises in general.

                        When my dad saw the stronghold, he made a very reasonable assumption that many components there and from Russian enterprises could be supplied. He was especially alarmed by such a familiar and familiar "curtain" complex for him (the chief designer of the optical component for which he once was).
                        Quote: Kars
                        Well, you, vryatli in the Thai habitat in the next 5 years, someone will massively put himself in the Armed Forces of the sun))))

                        But what has the "armata" to do with it? This animal in the next 10 years at least will be an obligate endemic, albeit with a very large area of ​​about 1/8 of the land. And in Thailand during this time can be successfully introduced such subspecies as, for example, the last modernization of the same leopard 2A5, which the Germans already nicknamed "revolutionary". And by the way, which is important, they position it exactly as an option for those. who wants to improve the existing already existing modifications of the second leo ...
                      2. +1
                        8 February 2016 21: 23
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        Well, we don't know what the "hot Thai guys" were thinking about, do we? Maybe they just wanted new tanks?

                        Egypt Abrams buys cheaper))) than 4,2
                        I'm not talking about the T-90.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        the familiar "curtain" complex (the chief designer of the optical component for which he was at one time).

                        Now it is called Warta, and make it according to Soviet documentation
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        But what has the "armata" to do with it?

                        And where does the stronghold become obsolete?
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        the last modernization of the same leopard 2A5, which the Germans already called "revolutionary"

                        So they’ll deliver him too. But it’s not a fact that he’s better. Heavier than that. He’ll objectively evaluate aiming systems hard, this is the only thing he can have better in picking with the A7
                      3. +4
                        8 February 2016 21: 46
                        Quote: Kars
                        Egypt Abrams buys cheaper))) than 4,2 I'm not talking about the T-90.

                        Firstly, we don’t know how, in principle, the situation was with the Amer’s willingness to sell something to the Thais, maybe the Thais needed 50 tanks, but the Americans didn’t want to sell a hundred or less? Like not profitable. This, of course, I o-very much exaggerate, but who knows?))))))
                        Quote: Kars
                        Now it is called Warta, and make it according to Soviet documentation

                        But it is interesting where it is produced and according to what kind of documentation there: the father clearly remembers that the documentation for the production of at least the optical component was handed over to not such a wide circle of enterprises, among which there were no Ukrainian ones.
                        Quote: Kars
                        And where does the stronghold become obsolete?

                        Despite the fact that by that time the same Germans or Americans can develop a good option for modernizing old Leo and Abrash, which will leave the stronghold far behind, given the situation in Ukraine now, I cannot believe it. that Ukrainian design bureaus will be able to develop something very new and enterprises will be able to establish its mass production.
                        Quote: Kars
                        So they’ll deliver him too, but it’s not a fact that he’s better.

                        I just gave it as an example of what is now. And what will be "tomorrow"? Considering that the "armata" that you mentioned in the sui has quite excited tank builders (at least in Europe), so in the near future we can expect a good stream of very decent modernizations of existing models of Western equipment, many of which will be exported.
                      4. +1
                        8 February 2016 21: 54
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        Firstly, we don’t know how there, in principle, the situation was with the amers' willingness to sell something to Thais,

                        and what they have any problems between the US and Thailand? Thailand can be said to be a regular buyer of US weapons.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        But it’s interesting where it is produced and what documentation there is:

                        That's what I don’t know, I don’t know.
                        But it is clear that there is no evidence that the Russian Federation sold at least one set of Curtains to Ukraine.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        With the fact that by that time the same Germans or Americans could develop a good option for the modernization of old Leo and Abrash, which will leave the stronghold far behind

                        I would like to see it. Yes, even that would leave far behind.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        And what will be "tomorrow"? Considering that the "armata" that you mentioned in the sui has quite excited tank builders (at least in Europe),

                        I personally have not seen any agitation. Unfortunately.

                        by the way, in my opinion, the leopard 2 closest to Thailand
                      5. +1
                        8 February 2016 22: 33
                        Quote: Kars
                        and what they have any problems between the US and Thailand? Thailand can be said to be a regular buyer of US weapons.

                        That's what I don’t know - I don’t know, Americans are also the same fruits - what they want is what they turn around, that is, they act in their interests, hegemons in a word ...)))))
                        Quote: Kars
                        That's what I don’t know, I don’t know.
                        But it is clear that there is no evidence that the Russian Federation sold at least one set of Curtains to Ukraine.

                        This also raises my questions of whether there is someone who sold to someone or not, but there is a fact: the problems with the production of strongholds in Ukraine began even before the Maidan, and this already leads to some thoughts ...
                        Quote: Kars
                        I would like to see it. Yes, even that would leave far behind.

                        the same Leo 2A7 is already not very bad, and most importantly - how do we know that the same stronghold is as good as it is painted? I remember the scandal with the cracked BTR-4 for Iraq ... There, of course, the story was dark. but still some thoughts arise again ...
                        Quote: Kars
                        I personally have not seen any agitation. Unfortunately.

                        Why - there were certain fermentations, and very intense, another thing is that the results will be visible in a couple of years only.
                        Quote: Kars
                        by the way, in my opinion, the leopard 2 closest to Thailand

                        By the way, it already looks good, by the way, to put the optics and the gun on the A7, so in general it will be sweet. The potential for modernization will, of course, be very close to its end. but the stronghold, forgive magnanimously, does not have it at all, because there is no opportunity to shove something into the old Soviet "teshki" beyond what they pushed into the stronghold or the T-90MS is no longer there, alas ((((
                      6. +1
                        8 February 2016 23: 49
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        problems with the production of strongholds in Ukraine began even before the Maidan,

                        I don’t remember any special problems before the Maidan. Considering that the Kharkov tank did not make new tanks after the fulfillment of the Pakistan contract, everything is within the normal range.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        the same Leo 2A7 is not very bad anymore,

                        Well, Leo2A7 costs like two Bastions. And weighs about the same

                        Quote: Albert1988
                        A memory of the cracked BTR-4 scandal for Iraq.


                        Thais accept tanks themselves, and the first five have been in operation for more than a year.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        Looks pretty good by the way

                        hung ceramic blocks, that's the whole surroundings.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        and A7, so generally sweetie will be.

                        What is this expressed in? The only more or less positive point is the auto tracking of the target.
                        Quote: Albert1988
                        but at the stronghold, forgive me generously, he is no longer at all

                        where did you get this from? and what do you intend to upgrade on the Oplot? which, by the way, is even adapted for the installation of 140 mm guns. And it weighs 20 tons lighter than the Leopard.
                      7. 0
                        9 February 2016 21: 21
                        Quote: Kars
                        I don’t remember any special problems before the Maidan. Considering that the Kharkov tank did not make new tanks after the fulfillment of the Pakistan contract, everything is within the normal range.

                        So you want to say that the inability of KhTZ to give out at least some acceptable batch of tanks during the period that was clearly indicated in the contract is the norm?
                        If so, what is there to say?
                        Quote: Kars
                        Thais accept tanks themselves, and the first five have been in operation for more than a year.

                        Well, fine, but where are the remaining tanks? And then the Thais already noted that with the paint on these very strongholds, not everything is so smooth ... And this, again, leads to some thoughts ...
                        Quote: Kars
                        hung ceramic blocks, that's the whole surroundings.

                        That is, in your opinion, German products do not guarantee an improvement in protection, but DZ and stronghold armor are the very thing, in light of the fact that in Donbass, the Ukrainian DZ on "bulat" and other T-64s of varying degrees of modernization proved to be yes oh not in the best way (and this is against the old Soviet shells!) the superiority of the stronghold in this area raises at least doubts ...
                        Quote: Kars
                        What is this expressed in? The only more or less positive point is the auto tracking of the target.

                        But nothing that the German L-120/55 is currently the most powerful tank gun in the world? Only our 2A82 so far surpasses it, but it is only on a couple of dozen experimental armatures. So the stronghold with its old Soviet 2A43 clearly loses to the German cat. And the fact that the Ukrainian shells will be so superior to modern German, somehow hardly believe ...
                        Well, the fact that Ukrainian optics will be comparable with German, I also allow myself to honestly doubt ...
                        Quote: Kars
                        where did you get this from? and what do you intend to upgrade at the Oplot?

                        How is that? SLA, BIUS, gun ...
                        Speaking of the gun - 140 mm per stronghold? 140 mm stupid into a tiny Soviet-style tower in which you can’t turn around anyway?
                        That's what I don't believe in, I don't believe in that! Yes, and I don’t appropriate the Stanislavsky laurels for myself ... Considering that even Leo and Abrasha didn’t pull 140mm, then what can we say about the stronghold, which is already hung up to the most. No, in principle it is possible to put it, only now the tower will have to be completely redone and do something ala "black eagle".

                        So if you briefly summarize, then modern Leo surpass the stronghold in terms of gun characteristics (the stronghold will leave here only due to missiles launched through the barrel, and it is not known how much of them can be produced by Ukraine, if at all), by the fire control system and, most importantly , according to crew survival (but here all Soviet tanks are far in touch).
                        And when you consider that Leo still has a slightly greater modernization potential than the old St. Petersburg 80, which in essence is a stronghold, as well as the fact that modern Ukraine is very unlikely to be able to develop something much superior to that. what she has now, we can draw the appropriate conclusion ...
      2. +1
        8 February 2016 23: 24
        Quote: Kars
        And what in Thailand did the tanks run out?

        In Thailand, there are approximately 330 of very old US medium tanks M-60 and M-48, and Chinese Type-69. And 190 light also outdated tanks.
        So the desire for rearmament is normal, because their medium tanks are something like the T-34, T-44 and T-55.
    5. +1
      8 February 2016 18: 21
      So I did not understand. The Kantemir division formed again includes T72 T80, the question is, where is T90? The question is not The topic of course, but still T90 left to right, and their last goes to Syria?
    6. +1
      8 February 2016 18: 59
      They will be told what to buy.
    7. +1
      8 February 2016 20: 04
      The United States kicks Thailand to buy hohlorazvaliny kicks)))
      1. +1
        8 February 2016 20: 23
        Quote: Civil
        buy hohlorazvaliny))

        Well, naturally. Otherwise, there is no way to explain that stupid Thai people will not buy the T-90 anyway.
        that would not be so offensive to read the article)))
        1. +4
          8 February 2016 22: 08
          Quote: Kars
          Well, naturally. Otherwise, there is no way to explain that stupid Thai people will not buy the T-90 anyway.

          Everyone understands that such information is considered insider and no one will confirm the conclusion of such a contract, only a leak.
          Whether or not such a contract will be clear within six months ............ that's all.
          1. +1
            8 February 2016 23: 52
            Quote: APASUS
            Whether or not such a contract will be clear within six months ............ that's all.

            What is the insider? UVZ shares are sold on the London stock market? And you should have 4 months at least from half a year. When were the Thais at the Tagil exhibition? And can you recall the T-90 trip to Peru and how it ended.
            1. +1
              9 February 2016 17: 53
              Quote: Kars
              Quote: APASUS
              Whether or not such a contract will be clear within six months ............ that's all.

              What is the insider? UVZ shares are sold on the London stock market? And you should have 4 months at least from half a year. When were the Thais at the Tagil exhibition? And can you recall the T-90 trip to Peru and how it ended.

              Will there be such a contract or not, while the Thais visited not only Russia, but also China, so we sit down more conveniently and observe the development of events
    8. +2
      8 February 2016 21: 46
      Thailand - in the sixes in the United States and for him there is a fight with China. And they don’t need our T-90s there. They have their own tanks - they’re steaming them. Most likely they will buy Abrams, for which they will then repent for a long time and expensive ... ;-)
    9. 0
      8 February 2016 23: 13
      Quote: Pereira
      And that is true. What for them are non-kosher tanks? Better without them at all than to displease the empire of good. Cheaper to lose the war. At a minimum, the elite will not lose deposits in American banks.

      And what have the "kosher" tanks. It was just that Ukraine offered them to supply their own, cheaper tanks than the T-90 in a short time, and deceived them. So they are looking at more expensive ones. The war in Syria will show the effectiveness of these tanks and then they will fork out. No one wants to buy equipment that has not yet shown itself. One thing can be said that modern Abrams and Leopards with their weight in the Thai jungle simply will not be able to fight.
      1. +1
        8 February 2016 23: 54
        Quote: Алексей_К
        It’s just that Ukraine offered them to deliver their cheaper tanks in a short time than the T-90 and deceived

        Really? T-90 costs more than 4,2 a million? Yes, and in terms of time, even initially was more than 3 years.
        Quote: Алексей_К
        No one wants to buy equipment that has not yet shown itself.

        Is the T-90 a new tank? It has been in operation and sold for more than a year, and its operation can be read in Indian forums and talk to Indian tankers.
        1. 0
          9 February 2016 12: 11
          Quote: Kars
          Is the T-90 a new tank? It has been in operation and sold for more than a year, and its operation can be read in Indian forums and talk to Indian tankers.

          Will you name a newer tank in the army? If you mean the T-14, then it has not yet passed all types of tests and is not supplied to the troops in series.
          Second: T-90 is the common name for all modifications of this type of tank. The last modification of the 2011 of the year for Russia is the T-90AM with the cost for Russia of 118 million rubles.
          There is nothing newer than this tank in Russia. Yes, and you can’t call him old either.
          1. +1
            9 February 2016 12: 14
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Will you name a newer tank in the army?

            Why? When are we talking about the tender that Thailand ruled in 2009 -2011 years?
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Second: T-90 is the common name for all modifications of this type of tank. Last modification of 2011

            this modification is not in service with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and has not been in time for the tender over the years either.
            So don't be fooled and clever
            Quote: Алексей_К
            growth Ukraine invited them to deliver their cheaper tanks in a short time than the T-90 and deceived.

            in that you do not understand and do not know.
  2. +3
    8 February 2016 18: 01
    Thailand has no plans to acquire Russian tanks


    They are in vain ... Good tanks on the farm will always come in handy!
    1. +2
      8 February 2016 18: 36
      To begin with, the Minister of Defense needs to swim out of the "oplotovo" shit dry ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    8 February 2016 18: 02
    They don’t want to - well, don’t. The master is the master. smile
  4. +6
    8 February 2016 18: 04
    The only country that fell for the "super" tank Oplot !!!))) Apparently they did not expect such a bummer!)))) Ukrainians, by the way, took this news that the tanks under the contract were not delivered in their own way. we have money and tanks in the ATO will send against the Russian hordes to fight! But in fact, there are less than a dozen of them. In general, it is not clear how the Kharkov plant survives. I hope the Thais will estimate the situation and make a choice in favor of our tanks
  5. +2
    8 February 2016 18: 04
    Quote: kote119
    They don’t want to - well, don’t. The master is the master. smile

    let them ride on horses !!!
  6. 0
    8 February 2016 18: 05
    "We will wait for the results of the T-90 tests in Syria," the Thais unofficially said.
    1. 0
      8 February 2016 18: 30
      And what to experience, there are no indestructible tanks. These barmalei will burn you even a leopard.
      1. +1
        8 February 2016 18: 49
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        And what to experience, there are no indestructible tanks. These barmalei will burn you even a leopard.

        many t90 burned?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          8 February 2016 19: 20
          Sometimes it's better to underestimate than overestimate the technique, and then disgrace.
          1. 0
            8 February 2016 19: 39
            Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
            Sometimes it's better to underestimate than overestimate the technique, and then disgrace.

            Do you clearly imagine the boundaries of this "under" and "over"?
        3. 0
          8 February 2016 19: 57
          Quote: poquello
          many t90 burned?

          Not yet, but judging by the way the loyals are leading the offensive, it’s quite possible to see.
          For example, East Guta recently, 50 people were lost by the Asadites and a tank with a crew ... To conduct an offensive in an open area wasn’t particularly hiding (they were high) or rather frivolous, especially not the first year of the war ...


          1. -2
            8 February 2016 20: 00
            And here is the video of the massacre
            1. +3
              8 February 2016 20: 34
              Quote: Mera Joota
              To conduct an offensive in an open area is not particularly hiding (they were stoned) or rather frivolous, especially not the first year of the war ...

              Quote: Mera Joota
              And here is the video of the massacre

              In my opinion, this is a well-organized ambush, judging by the situation of the dead and shooters, and not an offensive.
              1. +2
                8 February 2016 21: 43
                Quote: Vladimirets

                Quote: Mera Joota
                And here is the video of the massacre

                In my opinion, this is a well-organized ambush, judging by the situation of the dead and shooters, and not an offensive.

                and maybe treason to a heap, well, from what trample on bare terrain, like an airport in dill - like "everything is under control" forward
        4. -2
          8 February 2016 20: 04
          Quote: poquello
          many t90 burned?

          Did they fight a lot?
          1. 0
            8 February 2016 20: 33
            Quote: Bayonet
            Quote: poquello
            many t90 burned?

            Did they fight a lot?

            two months a decent period for direct clashes
        5. 0
          8 February 2016 20: 49
          For that we alone stole T 90A in South Ossetia
          1. -1
            8 February 2016 22: 39
            Quote: Vadim237
            For that we alone stole T 90A in South Ossetia

            so the Americans planned the operation there, not ours, "the joyful Tskhinvali people greet the Georgian liberators with flowers" - the bourgeoisie threw them on the Internet when Tskhinvali lay in ruins, and people in the basements
  7. +4
    8 February 2016 18: 10
    Thais now have the problem of getting money from Ukrainians at least. How the Ukrainians have treated the Thais, now they began to doubt.
  8. +6
    8 February 2016 18: 10
    But what for tanks in general in Thailand? When was the last time they fought? Do they have potential enemies?
    1. +1
      8 February 2016 18: 27
      Yes, they have no enemies, they are already under Uncle Sam.
      1. 0
        8 February 2016 18: 36
        nevertheless they spend money on weapons. According to NTV reports:

        German company Rheinmetall received an order for the supply of Skyguard system
        from an unknown customer in the amount of 390 million euros. customer unknown. It is known that in January the same system (4 installations) was ordered Thailand about ten times less to protect an "important and large object"
        The Skyguard system is distinguished by a combination of standard rapid-fire systems like Oerlikon, special radar equipment and programmable ammunition like Ahead-Air-Burst, in which the detonation time is programmed at the time of the shot depending on the parameters of the target (speed, distance).
    2. +2
      8 February 2016 18: 39
      Quote: Monos
      Do they have potential enemies?
      Everyone has enemies.
      Myanmar - Thailand: The Problem of Illegal Karen Migration (Myanmar) to Thailand.
      Thailand - Malaysia: Problems due to Muslim separatists in the southern provinces of Thailand (bordering Malaysia).
      Thailand - Laos: Disputes over islands on the r. Mekong, demarcation of the border continues.
      Thailand - Cambodia: Unresolved Disputes Over Unmarked Border Sections; Cambodia prevents access to the ruins of ancient temples located in territories transferred to Thailand by a decision of the International Court of Justice in 1962.
      At various times, Thailand fought against France, Japan, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.
      1. +1
        8 February 2016 18: 58
        Anthem to Thailand Written by our composer and Thais are very grateful to us and Nikolai
  9. +4
    8 February 2016 18: 12
    Contrary to some Thai media reports, Thailand has no plans to acquire Russian tanks
    "Burning in milk and blowing on water." Thais are cautious after the Ukrainian "break-off". And we do not mind: look, sit, evaluate, ask the price ... We will wait, ripen.
  10. +3
    8 February 2016 18: 25
    Thais are waiting for the T-90 to show themselves in Syria ... (and they will certainly show themselves in all their glory and power)
    1. 0
      8 February 2016 18: 57
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      Thais are waiting for the T-90 to show themselves in Syria ... (and they will certainly show themselves in all their glory and power)

      already show, the terrorists promised good money for the wrecked t90, while their victorious howl is not observed
  11. +2
    8 February 2016 18: 25
    Do not ride on Ukrainian Strongholds ride! (if they start) laughing
    1. +6
      8 February 2016 18: 36
      Quote: Mercenary
      Do not ride on Ukrainian Strongholds ride! (if they start)

      1. -6
        8 February 2016 18: 59
        noisy not riding mr.
        1. +10
          8 February 2016 19: 13
          Quote: art 230
          noisy not riding mr.

          What a deep technical analysis. Immediately visible analyteG laughing
  12. +4
    8 February 2016 18: 59
    They are not interested in the T-90, they will receive a "stronghold" modernized by Raguli and Seluk
  13. +3
    8 February 2016 19: 49
    Well, if Ukrainians did 2 cars in 10 years, then until the end of the contract there was nothing left, some 8 years. These are trifles laughing Well, if of course they strain, then maybe they will have time.
  14. +1
    8 February 2016 20: 34
    Ahahahaha ... they are still waiting for strongholds: D
  15. +3
    8 February 2016 22: 15
    The Chinese, and those Kiev consider Russian, even who speak Russian. And the Thais, the more there is no difference between Tagil and Kharkov.
    By the way, I’m too strong! wassat
  16. 0
    8 February 2016 23: 14
    Use yourself. Let the great p.ed.do.s.o.s. buy abrushki. If you have enough money for these hefty loud and loud monsters.
  17. 0
    9 February 2016 10: 29
    Unfortunately, all Thai "Op in mouth" have already burned down in the Donbass ... So they will not see cars, not penalties from the fascist UKRALINA ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"