Military Review

Varyag will be upgraded to 2020 g

66
The cruiser "Varyag" must undergo repairs and upgrades to 2020. In the course of the works, the ship will receive updated radio equipment, reports MIC with reference to RIA News.




“In the period until 2020, repair and modernization of the Pacific guards missile cruiser will be carried out fleet "Varangian". In the near future, an enterprise that will perform this work will be determined, ”a source told the agency.

According to him, "on the cruiser, the radio equipment will be updated, as well as various communications that ensure the life of the ship, both at the pier and at sea."

"In addition, the cruiser propulsion system will also be repaired and upgraded," he added.

Help newspaper: "Guards missile cruiser Varyag has a displacement of 11490 tons, its maximum length 186 meters, width - 20 meters. The cruiser has the autonomy of navigation in 30 days for the distance to 7500 nautical miles. The crew consists of 480 people, 16 launchers of the Vulcan anti-ship missile system are located on board the ship. ”
Photos used:
http://defence.ru/
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hammer
    Hammer 8 February 2016 14: 11
    +3
    I wonder how to change the main weapon systems? Will air defense be upgraded? Anyone in the know?
    1. Inok10
      Inok10 8 February 2016 14: 16
      11
      Quote: Hammer
      I wonder how to change the main weapon systems? Will air defense be upgraded? Anyone in the know?

      ... by 99% according to the Ustinov modernization option .. there are enough bumps there ... those documentation remained in Nikolaev ... hi
      1. seti
        seti 8 February 2016 14: 21
        +3
        Nothing. Our engineers have heads and they are not made from the finger. They will draw up a project, there are materials, and the golden hands of our workers will bring it to life. The ship will serve the Fatherland for a long time.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 8 February 2016 14: 23
          +7
          Quote: seti
          Nothing. Our engineers have heads and they are not made from the finger. They will draw up a project, there are materials, and the golden hands of our workers will bring it to life. The ship will serve the Fatherland for a long time.

          ... for one broken, two not broken give ... hi
          1. Eggor
            Eggor 8 February 2016 14: 39
            11
            Ustinov (s) Asterisk:
        2. Bulrumeb
          Bulrumeb 8 February 2016 14: 35
          16
          . Our engineers have heads and they are not made from the finger.

          It’s good that they are still there, engineers and workers. And then with our education system soon you will not find either qualified engineers or workers, some effective managers will be.
        3. Sura
          Sura 8 February 2016 14: 50
          0
          I agree, the main thing is that some design bureaus exist for many decades, high-class engineering personnel, a lot of experience, will do.
      2. Hammer
        Hammer 8 February 2016 14: 26
        +1
        Those. only repair and resource extension, upgrade only electronic equipment? The main armament will remain unchanged? .. well, in principle, probably the right decision in the current situation ... thanks for the info. hi
      3. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 8 February 2016 14: 34
        +1
        Quote: Inok10
        ... by 99% according to the Ustinov modernization option .. there are enough bumps there ... those documentation remained in Nikolaev ...

        So Ustinov’s only installed new antennas, it’s like - all the old weapons were left
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 8 February 2016 14: 56
          +4
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          So Ustinov’s only installed new antennas, it’s like - all the old weapons were left

          ... including all the cable of the route and brains ... there were rumors on the "Fort" launcher, there was no confirmation ... but in case of replacement, it turns into "Fort M" (PM2) with a slight movement of the hand, and as a result other missiles, range of destruction, max height of defeat, max speed of targets hit and the number of simultaneously tracked / attacked targets ... hi
          1. severyanin
            severyanin 9 February 2016 01: 01
            +2
            Oh, what people! Was it not with you, dear, we argued last year about the timing of the release of "Ustinov"? Well, who was right? hi
            Here you are vigorously and write in details in your comments about the modernization of individual systems, but again these are your conjectures, which have little to do with reality, believe me.
            And the cruiser, meanwhile, instead of plowing the expanses of the okyan seas and being where our country really needs it, continues to stand in the long-suffering prolonged repairs on the Zvezdochka ... It's all sad recourse
            The most important thing is not to give the rest of the cruisers of this project for repair to local "craftsmen" and "effective managers" - the sad example of "Ustinov" confirms this!
          2. Alex777
            Alex777 April 8 2016 19: 06
            0
            On Ustinov Zircon are going to fix.
            Because of this, the repairs were delayed until the end of 2016.
        2. Michael67
          Michael67 8 February 2016 14: 57
          +1
          On Ustinov, practically all the weapons will be new. The strike complex will definitely be new, as will the air defense. "Varyag" should be sent to "Zvezdochka". And it should undergo modernization not until the 20th year, but until the 18th (... I would like to).
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 8 February 2016 15: 36
            0
            The strike complex will definitely be new

            And where does this information come from?
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 8 February 2016 15: 52
              +3
              Quote: Wiruz
              And where does this information come from?

              ... P-500 "Basalt" on P-1000 "Vulcan" ... with the preservation of the launching equipment and a noticeable increase in the range of action due to the use of a new starting engine, an increase in the volume of fuel of the sustainer stage, a decrease in the mass of the rocket armor ... "Vulcan "continuation of" Basalt "... PU are identical .. hi ... according to "Fort" to Fort M "... B-203 to B-203A .. a difference of several tens of centimeters in length TPK, in the photo ... hi
              1. Wiruz
                Wiruz 8 February 2016 19: 54
                +1
                Ugh, damn it. I already thought there would be some sort of macaron of Caliber or Onyx shoved, while increasing ammunition, and you mean Volcanoes request
                1. kugelblitz
                  kugelblitz 8 February 2016 21: 39
                  0
                  The volcano and now a very cool rocket.
            2. Alex777
              Alex777 16 February 2016 22: 05
              0
              According to the statement of the naval leadership, Ustinov will be supplied with "a strike complex of which is not yet available" this year.
              Obviously, this is neither Volcano nor Basalt, and what science is not exactly aware of.
              There is a timid hope for Zircon. In any case, they are going to put him on Nakhimov.
          2. gispanec
            gispanec 8 February 2016 16: 22
            0
            Quote: Michael67
            The strike complex will definitely be new

            what is it, I’m embarrassed to ask ???? The old ones are standing and what new can be stuffed into them ????? if you are talking about a volcano, what kind of new one is it ?? ... although it is newer than basalt ...
          3. severyanin
            severyanin 9 February 2016 01: 02
            0
            Quote: Michael67
            On Ustinov, practically all the weapons will be new. The strike complex will definitely be new, as will the air defense. "Varyag" should be sent to "Zvezdochka". And it should undergo modernization not until the 20th year, but until the 18th (... I would like to).

            Bullshit ... where does infa come from?
            PS: in no case should you put "Varyag" or "Moscow" on "Zvezdochka" !!! This organization has completely compromised itself with the repair of "Ustinov" - the terms are disrupted, the quality of the repair is very low! am
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 8 February 2016 14: 32
      +1
      Quote: Hammer
      Will air defense be upgraded? Anyone in the know?

      So, like Fort, the coolest anti-aircraft defense system is so far. By more powerful until not messed up
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 8 February 2016 14: 41
        +5
        Quote: Tusv
        So, like Fort, the coolest anti-aircraft defense system is so far. By more powerful until not messed up

        EMNIP, at 1164 there is a "clean" "Fort": S-300F. And there is already "Fort-M" S-300FM with more long-range missiles (1 complex is on "Peter the Great").
      2. Michael67
        Michael67 8 February 2016 15: 01
        0
        There will be a modernized "Fort".
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 8 February 2016 17: 38
      0
      Impressive ship, "Varyag", but "Moscow" in Sevastopol saw.
  2. Dangerous
    Dangerous 8 February 2016 14: 13
    0
    Let's hope that by 2020 our navy will be replenished with a sufficient number of frigates 22350 and 11356, so that the absence of the Varyag in the ranks will not become critical
    1. Fregate
      Fregate 8 February 2016 14: 20
      +2
      But who knows? There are no engines of their own yet and how many will be there until 2020 is unknown.
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 8 February 2016 14: 23
      +4
      Quote: Dangerous
      Let's hope that by 2020 our navy will be replenished with a sufficient number of frigates 22350 and 11356, so that the absence of the Varyag in the ranks will not become critical

      And where will they come from in sufficient quantities? If a miracle happens, and even then, no more than four ships.
      1. Rader
        Rader 8 February 2016 14: 48
        0
        I note that the Varangian is still a cruiser, a ship of the first rank. And with the ships of the first rank, the greatest problems are observed. An equivalent replacement for this combat unit could be the destroyer of the Leader project, which now exists on paper. By 2020, Russia can only have a couple of battle-worthy cruisers (Peter and Moscow)! It is not solid. Do not get me wrong, frigates are good, especially if they do not have to be towed, but they are not a substitute for cruisers, which are not getting younger ...
        1. Andrey77
          Andrey77 8 February 2016 17: 33
          0
          We have no new cruisers and are not expected. Be patient.
        2. severyanin
          severyanin 9 February 2016 00: 35
          0
          Quote: Rader
          By the 2020 year, Russia can only have a couple of battle-worthy cruisers (Peter and Moscow)

          I will correct - "Peter" and "Ustinov" (they must finally push him out of the long-suffering repair at "Zvezdochka")
          "Moscow" and "Varyag" without repairs until 2020 will definitely not hold out in their condition
          1. Andrey77
            Andrey77 11 February 2016 13: 11
            0
            Below is my link to the Ship. See who we can.
    3. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 8 February 2016 14: 30
      +5
      The eye cuts right
      Quote: Dangerous
      our navy

      For your information:
      Navy - A type of armed forces designed to conduct search and rescue operations, protect the economic interests of Russia, and conduct combat operations at sea and ocean theaters of operations. The Navy is capable of delivering conventional and nuclear attacks on the enemy’s naval and coastal forces, disrupting its naval communications, landing marines, etc. The Russian Navy consists of four fleets and one flotilla: the Baltic, Northern, Pacific and Black Sea and Caspian flotillas .

      Learn mat.chast!
      1. yuriy55
        yuriy55 8 February 2016 14: 56
        -2
        Quote: oborzevatel
        ... Learn the mat.chast!


        Come on. Why get hardened. Confused by habit (US Navy), with whom it does not happen ... wink
        1. Poppy
          Poppy 8 February 2016 17: 33
          +1
          suspicious habit laughing
    4. Michael67
      Michael67 8 February 2016 15: 04
      -3
      It is necessary that by 2020, the Amer fleet to be in the sea-Akiyan became dumb.
    5. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 8 February 2016 15: 52
      0
      Quote: Dangerous
      Let's hope that by 2020 our navy will be replenished with a sufficient number of frigates 22350 and 11356, so that the absence of the Varyag in the ranks will not become critical


      What 2020 year, the bill for the days has already gone ..
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 8 February 2016 22: 13
        +1
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        What 2020 year, the bill for the days has already gone ..
        Well, do not languish ... yes
        Finally, name D-Day ... am
        And then, the time is unequal, I won’t fulfill the mobile prescription ...crying
        Something dumb from one thought about it becomes:
        the war began, "but the men don't know" ... bully
  3. ASUR
    ASUR 8 February 2016 14: 19
    -1
    Yes .. I would like to increase the number of new boats in parallel with improving the quality of existing ones ...
    1. severyanin
      severyanin 9 February 2016 00: 47
      0
      Quote: ASUR
      Yes .. I would like to increase the number of new boats in parallel with improving the quality of existing ones ...

      And where does the submarine ????? Have you read the article at all, or just to leave a comment as soon as possible ???
      1. ASUR
        ASUR 11 February 2016 08: 57
        0
        Northerner
        A boat, not a submarine ...
        I read the article.
        The forum and articles here are just for People to leave their comments.
        What hungry for something?
  4. kote119
    kote119 8 February 2016 14: 20
    -1
    the repair will most likely take place at the Severodvinsk "Zvezdochka", they have experience, this year they will hand over the same type Ustinov
    1. severyanin
      severyanin 9 February 2016 00: 44
      -1
      Quote: kote119
      the repair will most likely take place at the Severodvinsk "Zvezdochka", they have experience, this year they will hand over the same type Ustinov

      It is better not to be on the "Zvezdochka", otherwise the poor fellow "Ustinov" still cannot get out of the tenacious sweaty palms of the "effective managers" there ... The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation also has enough complaints against the Severodvinsk shipbuilders ...
      These "comrades" (Zvezdochka) are already asleep and see how a piece even fatter "Ustinov" - "Kuznetsov" will come to them next year
      The best option, in my opinion, is to give the order for the repair of "Varyag" to "Dalzavod"
  5. igor.borov775
    igor.borov775 8 February 2016 14: 22
    +1
    So they took up the old people. While there are still no opportunities, and most importantly, new projects satisfying the requirements of the Ministry of Defense. First you need to launch a new series of destroyers.
    ☺☺
  6. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 8 February 2016 14: 23
    +1
    It is high time. It’s good that they did it, it’s a pity that it will just stretch out over a long period. During this time, it will be necessary to strengthen the Pacific Fleet grouping, otherwise Japan is not just building helicopter carriers, but again and again raising the Kuril questions.
  7. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 8 February 2016 14: 23
    0
    Well, this is a ship - so a ship, not like the Ukrainian misunderstanding from the next article ..
  8. Rosty
    Rosty 8 February 2016 14: 30
    +4
    It is high time. A very successful project, especially at the Pacific Fleet, the group clearly does not meet the current challenges. I wonder if rearmament is provided? Well, money - if they start to postpone the deadlines, it can sadly end.
  9. triglav
    triglav 8 February 2016 14: 31
    +1
    And it will be like new.
  10. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 8 February 2016 14: 36
    +8
    February 2016 Sevastopol, Severnaya Bukhta. Guards missile cruiser Moskva. After a long campaign. Scheduled repairs soon.
  11. kugelblitz
    kugelblitz 8 February 2016 14: 38
    +3
    I want the ships of this project to exist forever, even after decommissioning it must be preserved, as an engineering masterpiece and an identity of functional beauty! I personally do not like atomic irons at all, but Atlanta ... mmm ... beauty !!!
    1. shans2
      shans2 8 February 2016 15: 11
      +1
      Better eagles, no cooler)
  12. red joni
    red joni 8 February 2016 14: 42
    +5
    long years of service to the cruiser "Varyag" and new victories with new weapons.
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 8 February 2016 15: 00
      +4
      Just for the sake of the heroic predecessor, you need to do ...
      1. Yarik
        Yarik 8 February 2016 15: 55
        0
        Here recently, in "Memoirs of the Activities of the First Pacific Squadron and Naval Commands on the Shore in
        during the siege of Port Arthur in 1904 "M. Bubnov met that the author attributed him to the armored cruisers. About how. Confused?" belay
        1. Andrey77
          Andrey77 8 February 2016 17: 30
          +1
          No. Armored cruiser 1st rank.
          1. Poppy
            Poppy 8 February 2016 17: 34
            0
            but not armored?
            1. Andrey77
              Andrey77 11 February 2016 12: 52
              0
              Armored. So Melnikov - R.M. Melnikov "Cruiser Varyag". Edition 1983
  13. GEV67
    GEV67 8 February 2016 14: 55
    0
    Upgrading is great! Still, they would have built more new ones, so that everyone would know that Russia is a great sea power! soldier
  14. Sazaren
    Sazaren 8 February 2016 15: 19
    +1
    We are modernizing, building, and to the United States
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 8 February 2016 17: 35
      0
      And the United States does not overtake, and why?
  15. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 8 February 2016 15: 51
    0
    Quote: Sazaren
    We are modernizing, building, and to the United States

    And now we do not have the task of "catching up and overtaking", the concept is different - reasonable counteraction with maximum efficiency and minimum costs hi !
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 8 February 2016 22: 35
      +1
      Quote: gladysheff2010
      Other-reasonable countermeasure concept with maximum efficiency and minimum cost

      As far as I remember (in order not to ruin the economy and not tear industry), the concept of defense sufficiency was adopted.
      Then the economy was still sagging, social tension was emerging in society - they adopted the concept of minimum necessary defense sufficiency under a nuclear umbrella. (By analogy with GB).
      And what is circulating at the top right now, I really don’t know ...
      But we hold on to vigorous weapons tightly, as we can’t defeat the adversary in any other way: it hurts a lot of them to divorce ... We’ll think about it here ...
      (Maybe some thread of their livestock can be edited with Ebola? Not openly, but "disgusting", out of sly, how they shit on us. Well, at least the same GB /////) recourse
  16. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 8 February 2016 16: 01
    +1
    Quote: Sazaren
    We are modernizing, building, and to the United States

    And I believe that we do not need quantitative parity with the US Navy. Well, how many aircraft carriers need to be built, not to mention the destroyers. For my unprofessional one must somehow try to compensate for the quantity with quality, and parity is needed in SSBNs.
    By the way, for a long time there was no article from Oleg Kaptsov about armored ships.
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 8 February 2016 17: 28
      -1
      The SSBN has already deployed as much as possible under the contract. Nowhere else to go.
  17. Michael67
    Michael67 9 February 2016 00: 38
    +1
    [quote = Michael67] It is necessary that by 2020 the Amer fleet be in the Akiyan Sea becomes dumb. [/ quote Hey, disagree, what do you want, su..chok ... with its minuses. Comrades will support me in any way. Write me your address. I will explain (explain) at your leisure, where is the Motherland and where is the feeder. Come here with ...
  18. VadimSt
    VadimSt 9 February 2016 05: 58
    -1
    Quote: severyanin
    PS: in no case should you put "Varyag" or "Moscow" on "Zvezdochka" !!! This organization has completely compromised itself with the repair of "Ustinov" - the terms are disrupted, the quality of the repair is very low!
    Yes, this is all clear, but how are we going to "live" in the future, and even more so to develop? To blame everything on those "who can do it", to eliminate all "who can not do it" or to force "to train in repairing on cats"? At the same time, do not forget to set a queue for a promising "repair", until about 3020? This is complete nonsense. With a guarantee of further destruction in Russia of its own shipbuilding and the working class. And who will build ships and where, the ubiquitous creative class, at meetings, on the Swamp or in underground workshops!
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 11 February 2016 12: 57
      0
      Something like this: http://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/123490.html
      The ship more or less gives an objective assessment.

      And do not have tantrums, who and where will build the ships. We will understand without you.