Military Review

Russia's preventive global strike

188
Constantly read in the world media articles in which well-known Western journalists and analysts argue about the preventive strike of the United States and the West on Russia with subtext: stand, or maybe not stand, and it's time? How about some self-evident opportunity. After all, Russia, the Western media are shouting, is so “aggressive,” so the West seems to have the right to do so.




Italian Il Giornale writes about the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation: “Being isolated from Russia, not counting sea routes, Kaliningrad was always regarded as a weak link in the new Russian strategy, but it was sufficiently strengthened to inflict maximum damage in the case of a preemptive strike from NATO". According to the American General Frank Gorenko, "this is an extremely dangerous situation."

Italian journalists and American generals concluded that a preemptive strike on Kaliningrad would not bring the desired results, too well protected, unfortunately? The recent meeting of Nuland-Surkov in the same Kaliningrad was deciphered by the Western media as a warning from Nuland about the NATO “imminent attack” on Russia.

Recently, the BBC again distinguished itself: it took off like a “documentary”, using video clips of the war in the Donbas, the film “Third World War: at the command post”. This, so to speak, is a warning film, with the reasoning of well-known British ex-politicians, about how Russia’s “aggression” against Latvia can (or will be?) Look like atomic weapons against the English warship. And in Sweden, nuclear exercises of the Russian aviation, says the whole NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, but without evidence ...

Strictly speaking, this is called the preparation of a western man in the street for a sudden "disarming" NATO attack on Russia, and its justification. Especially considering the insults and defamation of the Russian president are already government officials of the United States and Britain.

At the same time, analysts of “aggressive Russia”, like water in their mouths, scored, and are afraid to say a word in their “aggressive manner”. Break this vicious tradition.

On the one hand, we repeat, we see the preparation of not only Western, but also world public opinion for a preventive US nuclear strike against Russia, supposedly “disarming” and therefore almost “humane”. If Russia did not have atomic weapons, then the US atomic attack on Russia-USSR took place long ago, according to the already declassified American plan "Dropshot", or an attack on Russia took place according to the Yugoslav scenario, which many Western high-ranking political analysts openly dream of. The nuclear forces of Russia prevent the Yugoslav-Russian scenario from being realized, but the information aggression of the West has already begun ...

I understand this danger, given the increasing propaganda aggression in the Western media against Russia, which is actually a preparation for a military attack (that’s how Hitler’s Germany acted before its blitzkriegs), maybe Russia should speculate on a preventive humane “disarming” attack on the West, from USA to Europe? Why not, if the West publicly discusses such strategies?

Our Stratfor could say in response that there are no coincidences in the Great Game, and the West’s propaganda attack on Russia is a harbinger of a sudden and treacherous military attack. Russia is trying to warn the West about the consequences, and this is why the military operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria is being carried out - this is a demonstration of Russia's military capabilities. Togo, for example, what can happen in Ukraine if Russia has to conduct a peacekeeping operation there to disarm the Bandera neo-Nazi formations. In order not to have to use VKS in Ukraine, Russia and conducts significant military exercises in Syria.

By the way, Bandera's spells about the imminent disintegration of Russia, thanks to which Banderia will flourish, say that Bandera propagandists consider the imminent attack of the West on Russia by the affair already decided. After all, Banderia itself is part of the plan for an attack on Russia, a springboard for this. Some American generals in the summer of 2015 bluntly said that American missiles and Bandera bayonets would smash Russia. And the Kiev Hitlers painted on the billboards the entrance of the ukrovermht to Moscow.

What they think is incomprehensible, since in the case of the Great War, Ukraine will become the main field of this war, and what it will turn into is difficult to imagine. While Russia can count on the preservation of its eastern regions and Siberia. However, what about the Galician raguls, when European sages put US bases on their territory.

Therefore, Russia may demand the immediate cessation of propaganda aggression in the Western media, and the disavowal of provocative materials already released, such as the war in the Baltic States from the BBC. And the denazification of the Bandera regime. If this does not happen, Russia can take this information war seriously, as preparation for a sudden military attack on it, that war with the West is inevitable ...

In a situation of propaganda aggression, the "human factor" can be superimposed on a failure in the computer networks of the Russian Defense Ministry, or even some accident, and the West itself can receive the first "disarming" humane blow. Yes, then Russia will compensate for the damage caused, within reasonable limits and from a position of strength. After all, in the end, the West itself is to blame: with its plans for preventive strikes and a propaganda campaign, it provoked a "global humane" blow to Russia, it also began to consider it possible.

At the same time, most likely, there will be no Russian invasion of either the Baltic States or Georgia, or Europe, or America, which are broadcast by Stratfor and the BBC. What for? Who we need to get, we will get it anyway! - President Putin has already answered this question. There is no operational need.

In general, Russia today has nothing to lose. Russia-USSR surrendered to the West the Warsaw Pact, surrendered their union republics, so what? We were left alone? The vagrancy before the West of our liberal column indicates what kind of "civilized" West Russia will be. In the humane opinion of our liberals, Russia must endure and defend itself, but in such a way as not to harm the West and the progress of its similar values. And why do we need such values ​​and liberal lackeyess?

For some reason, our liberal column is confident that the military and economic power of the United States is forever, that it is a kind of constant, not subject to the influence of time, crises and catastrophes. And we will see, we will not hurry. We will preserve the sovereignty of Russia, and there, you see, the United States will collapse like the USSR. Freedom to the enslaved peoples of America and Europe!

The task of our liberals is to generate pro-Western decadent sentiments in Russia, and to justify the need for Russia to retreat before the West, to surrender positions further and further. Stanislav Belkovsky, who talked about Putin's riches on the BBC, on the air of Ekho Moskvy, said honestly that it is not usually his characteristic: “Russia needs the West to give it to him.” And we answer him: the West needs Russia to calibrate it. And our liberal column also needs it very much ...
Author:
188 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. as150505
    as150505 8 February 2016 07: 34 New
    56
    Do not bend! Our strength is in truth!
    1. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 8 February 2016 07: 49 New
      31
      Gods are with us our land ...
      1. cniza
        cniza 8 February 2016 08: 07 New
        23
        Freedom to the enslaved peoples of America and Europe!


        All these conclusions and analyzes are not encouraging; slogans cannot solve all these problems.
        1. skeptic
          skeptic 8 February 2016 14: 17 New
          27
          Quote: cniza
          Freedom to the enslaved peoples of America and Europe!


          All these conclusions and analyzes are not encouraging; slogans cannot solve all these problems.


          The lack of care before the West of our liberal column speaks of what Russia will be "civilized" by the West. According to the humane opinion of our liberals, Russia should tolerate and defend itself, but in such a way as not to harm the West and the progress of its gay-like values. And why do we need such values ​​and liberal servility?


          Liberoids hope for "warm places" in the administration of the reserves, which the Western crap-mongers hope to destroy Russia, if they win, and our task is to break off their attempts.
        2. Alekseev
          Alekseev 8 February 2016 19: 56 New
          16
          Quote: cniza
          slogans do not solve all these problems.

          And when were such problems solved by slogans?
          It must be said bluntly that only the guaranteed destruction of NATO countries, including the United States, the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation prevents them from using force against our country.
          And so it has always been in the nuclear era, remember the many plans of Americans from the end of World War 2 ...
          For some reason, in the responses of our media to the stupid BBC film about the nuclear war, there was no advice to former high-ranking British women to worry more about whether it would be good or bad to destroy "millions of Russians", but about the fact that the UK in this case simply will not be. And she can disappear from the face of the earth not only with abstract millions of citizens, but also together with them, their children and relatives ...
          Perhaps an understanding of this fact would lead to an end to the silly chatter about saving the Baltic states from Russian aggression and NATO solidarity.
          1. madjik
            madjik 8 February 2016 21: 40 New
            +4
            it is necessary, as if by chance, to merge in the media information about the goals and objects of our nuclear strikes and there will be a howl, and for us? laughing
            1. Awega
              Awega 9 February 2016 20: 09 New
              +3
              ... well, maybe they leaked "accidentally" Status-6. So that you understand what horseradish is and what it is eaten with.
          2. pesny2006
            pesny2006 9 February 2016 09: 55 New
            10
            ... It must be said bluntly that only the guaranteed destruction of the NATO countries, including the USA, the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation prevents them from using force against our country ...
            I would add: "And the USA and England in the first place" ....
            1. BLACK-SHARK-64
              BLACK-SHARK-64 10 February 2016 20: 22 New
              0
              in the very first ... then the rest ... angry
          3. Ivan Ivanovich
            Ivan Ivanovich 9 February 2016 19: 18 New
            +5
            Liberastov on stakes ...
            1. BLACK-SHARK-64
              BLACK-SHARK-64 10 February 2016 20: 23 New
              0
              first pepper in point .... am
        3. NordUral
          NordUral 8 February 2016 21: 43 New
          14
          Everything can happen while all this liberal bastard is in power, for which our country is only a feeding trough, but not a homeland. We need to make an unambiguous conclusion - to roll the liberals in the elections, those who have not completely lost their minds and conscience to be called to work for the good of the country and people, and not their own wallet. Otherwise, anything could happen.
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 8 February 2016 21: 49 New
            -21 qualifying.
            Quote: NordUral
            We need to make an unambiguous conclusion - to roll liberals in the elections, those who have not completely lost their minds and conscience to be called to work for the good of the country and people, and not their own wallet

            You are .. funny .. "I want everything, a lot, and you can go without bread" ..

            Are there any ready-made recipes? Who will you vote for ??

            Freaks, plin ..
            1. NordUral
              NordUral 8 February 2016 22: 12 New
              20
              My friend, why be rude. You are so tolerant in Europe.
              And for whom to decide without you decide.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 9 February 2016 08: 37 New
                -1
                Quote: NordUral
                My friend, why be rude

                This, in fact, was not for you personally .. so, a collective image.

                If accidentally hit - my apologies repeat

                Quote: NordUral
                You are so tolerant in Europe

                The flag is left, already tired of repeating .. Although the city of Korolev, he, essno, is also in Europe laughing

                Quote: NordUral
                for whom to vote without you decide

                Good luck. I had a key question there - "and for whom." Because I also have to decide, and there are no special ideas yet.

                PS: Moreover - you will choose only from those from whom you will be allowed to choose. And for some reason, actor Evdokimov comes to mind ... the people's governor .. no, that a normal man cannot be taken away .. only now - how did he manage to become famous and how did it end?

                And you are elections, elections .. request
                1. dali
                  dali 9 February 2016 21: 33 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  PS: Moreover - you will choose only from those from whom you will be allowed to choose.

                  Look at this tattered cat - the smartest cat, what ?!

                  Well, tell me, you are not our smartest freak-handsome, where is much better in the world?

                  And of course you choose who you want ... laughing

                  By the way, these words hurt you so much in NordUral’s comment -
                  Quote: NordUral
                  ride liberals in the elections, those who have not completely lost their minds and conscience to call to work for the good of the country and people,
                  hotly sensed beneath ...

                  In addition, there are just those who choose - the liberals, and those who oppose them. And there are all kinds of things on either side ... but only one thing is certain, the liberalists are ready (some of their own free will, and some of them with a misunderstanding) to surrender Russia ...
            2. LeftPers
              LeftPers 9 February 2016 05: 53 New
              +5
              You yourself are a freak plin, for the team that is now.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 9 February 2016 08: 40 New
                +1
                Quote: LeftPers
                You yourself are a freak plin

                Exactly accepted laughing

                Quote: LeftPers
                for the team that is now

                The team that is very heterogeneous now, dispute?

                And the thing, IMHO, is not so much in the team, but in completely external circumstances. Although .. there are not enough good people there - quite enough.

                Something like that.
                Understand one thing - even though you choose a wizard in a blue helicopter - nothing, by and large, will not change
                1. Winter cherry
                  Winter cherry 9 February 2016 09: 20 New
                  +2
                  Your suggestions?
                  1. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 9 February 2016 10: 11 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Winter cherry
                    Your suggestions?

                    Shots (joke).

                    I have no real ideas, I repeat. Therefore, I am trying to awaken .. um .. ideas .. from the "militant".

                    Something like that.
                  2. BLACK-SHARK-64
                    BLACK-SHARK-64 10 February 2016 20: 27 New
                    0
                    100 rubles???? laughing
        4. samuil60
          samuil60 8 February 2016 22: 43 New
          +8
          Yes ... Solved issues in civilian fashion. With the help of mainly cavalry. And here, when the world government sits in its bunkers deep underground and dreams of reducing the world's population by 2/3, then turning most of the survivors into lifelong slaves, there is no need to wave a bomb. Stalin took time to rearm the army, and he didn’t have time ... I can imagine what would happen if Hitler attacked in the 39th! We would not even have time to prepare the plant sites in the Urals ... But Stalin was wise. Why does the author of the article consider Putin an idiot !?
          1. KaPToC
            KaPToC 9 February 2016 13: 04 New
            0
            Can German superhumans fight without training? In the thirty-ninth after the Polish company, the very idea of ​​a blitzkrieg was just born.
        5. Chera
          Chera 10 February 2016 11: 57 New
          0
          Without slogans - even more so.
      2. aba
        aba 8 February 2016 08: 10 New
        +5
        I do not like it when they remember the name of the Lord in vain. Yes, and the Crusades would not hurt to remember.
        1. Aleksey_K
          Aleksey_K 8 February 2016 12: 18 New
          +7
          Quote: aba
          I do not like it when they remember the name of the Lord in vain.

          You didn't read the words "Alex_Rarog" carefully. He wrote - "God is with us ...". This is a pagan saying. It has nothing to do with Christianity and the triune God. So don't worry.
          1. 2С5
            2С5 8 February 2016 16: 38 New
            +3
            ... Adolf Catholic had a chip to steal and redraw Old Slavic symbols and expressions ... he probably paid for it negative
            1. Winter cherry
              Winter cherry 9 February 2016 09: 23 New
              +2
              No, he was a Satanist, although the Catholic popes are also somewhere nearby.
              1. Agent_017
                Agent_017 10 February 2016 17: 40 New
                0
                I wonder what secrets and artifacts the Vatican hides. The course of history could turn around. It was necessary to get to Italy and undo this birdhouse ...
                1. BLACK-SHARK-64
                  BLACK-SHARK-64 10 February 2016 20: 30 New
                  0
                  not a birdhouse but an adder ..... am
        2. NordUral
          NordUral 8 February 2016 21: 46 New
          +2
          You got the address wrong. On a crusade and other campaign - this is to the West.
      3. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ 8 February 2016 08: 22 New
        39
        Pancake! Got these cheers patriots!
        Russia-USSR surrendered the Warsaw Pact to the West, surrendered its union republics, and so what? Are we left alone? The lack of care in the West of our liberal column speaks of how Russia will be "civilized" by the West - from an article

        It is unlikely that anyone will fight against Russia, which is militarily strong, with a nuclear potential, especially with a tendency to restore the military potential destroyed by Serdyukov. It is called more expensive for itself.
        They can provoke a military conflict by someone else’s hands, such as the Georgian 08.08.08., By extracting a certain political capital from it.
        But they will try to ruin Russia, like the USSR, using the fifth liberal column. Moreover, this treacherous fifth column in state power.
        This is the BASIC THREAT to Russia, and by the way, not worked out in the State Security Program. The ruling oligarchs and corrupt officials, in order to preserve part of their right to plunder Russia, can go for the surrender of state interests, betraying Russia itself and its people.
        1. Voha_krim
          Voha_krim 8 February 2016 08: 34 New
          22
          After all, Russia, the Western media shout, is so “aggressive,” so the West seems to have a right to it.

          Veiko Korhonen from the city of Oulu (Finland) posted a very unexpected publication on his page on the social network. The results of Russia's “aggressions” - half of Europe and part of Asia received statehood from the hands of Russia (USSR).

          Full and additional list on
          http://c-pravda.ru/newspapers/2016/02/04/pochemu-polmira-obyazany-rossii
          1. aleksey980
            aleksey980 9 February 2016 13: 50 New
            0
            Quote: Voha_krim

            Full and additional list on
            http://c-pravda.ru/newspapers/2016/02/04/pochemu-polmira-obyazany-rossii

            It is very interesting and instructive, but I never found a single "proof" that it was written by this person and what about it in general, i.e. post or link to the original post ((
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 8 February 2016 08: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: vladimirZ
          Moreover, this treacherous fifth column in state power.

          Gorbachev thinks the same way you do. You are his worthy student.
          1. kotvov
            kotvov 8 February 2016 18: 50 New
            +8
            By the way, Alexander, you are aware that Gorby was awarded a medal for winning the Cold War, now he can criticize anyone he wants, he did his job.
            1. ARS56
              ARS56 9 February 2016 16: 28 New
              +3
              In addition to the enemy medal, for the victory in the Cold War, the labeled traitor also awarded the liberoid Medvedev the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called when he was a resident of Russia. This denigration of the Order cannot be forgotten by Medvedev.
          2. Svidetel 45
            Svidetel 45 8 February 2016 22: 52 New
            +7
            And this worthlessness is not worth mentioning at all, a lot of honor for him. He is dissatisfied with the fact that our liberals have been ruining Russia for so long, that in five or six years he has managed with the USSR, and our liberoids have been rooting Russia for almost 15 years, and they still won’t finish the job.
          3. Michael
            Michael 9 February 2016 19: 28 New
            -1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: vladimirZ
            Moreover, this treacherous fifth column in state power.

            Gorbachev thinks the same way you do. You are his worthy student.

            Scoops .. What to take from them! Sausage for 3.20.
            You need to wean them, from all these dogmas .. Slaves, were and remain ..
          4. nikeseverin
            nikeseverin 10 February 2016 11: 47 New
            +1
            Who would talk about the fifth column, but not this ghoul. Although Dimon may well be a secret patch.
          5. demidov.evg
            demidov.evg 10 February 2016 15: 23 New
            0
            I believe that, from Gorbachev's point of view, Putin and Medvedev are "traitors to democracy" and "the civilized world community." I think this is how Gorbachev's words should be understood. Putin, and to some extent Medvedev, and with them the whole of Russia, in the opinion of a certain category of citizens, is what the "civilized" West is "betraying". Oh no no no! How bad! What a shame! belay
            As for Vladimir's commentary, it seems to me that by "the treacherous fifth column in the power of the state" he meant not the top leaders of the Russian Federation, but a part of the political elite close to running the state or to its top officials.
          6. Agent_017
            Agent_017 10 February 2016 17: 43 New
            0
            And where did this chicken - Gorbachev come from? From the alpine mountains? Where does the ax reach? It’s like a rooster for a loyal chicken coop, he needs to cut his head off so that he can run around the yard .. I’m buying my dear Raisa Maximovna, what a brave husband you have ..
        3. Grbear
          Grbear 8 February 2016 08: 52 New
          20
          vladimirZI’ll plant my piglet.

          And what our liberals think about - advanced wrestlers fool ... In case of aggravation of relations with the West, they will be the first in line to be simply destroyed, because they are closer and the people will not "harness" for them. And even after a "preemptive" strike, their fate does not arouse optimism - the survivors will "find" the guilty ones. We should not forget the fate of all traitors - few of them died in a warm bed.
          In the place of the West, I would cherish and cherish Russia with free loans and all sorts of "sweets" until she got fat, like Europe - to the point where your girlfriend is fucked, and the "Russian" would stand and cry.
          D ... b ... (Lavrov ®). hi
          ps By the way, some of the work they have already done Ї since 2002, about 30 million young people have his education, and tomorrow they will come to power. This is a topic for thought.
          hi
          1. vladimirZ
            vladimirZ 8 February 2016 09: 40 New
            23
            GrBear (1)

            Our ruling liberals are thinking about how to preserve their position, palaces / houses / accounts / yachts in the West, their "peaceful" relations with the West, and the right to rob Russia.
            It is in this "right to rob Russia" that they have a conflict with the West, imperialist competition for raw materials markets.
            Today's Russia no longer has ideological contradictions with the West, and here and there, the ideology of the "golden calf" is capitalism.
            Until a certain time, years so "the end of Serdyukovschina", our bourgeois (it's time to get used to this class term) thought that they were accepted into the ranks of the moneybags of the West, and therefore their government destroyed its Army, fearing "a man with a gun", hoping for "friendly" relations with the West, especially since they invested their capital there, supporting the US economy, buying houses and palaces there, transporting their families.

            But "American Uncle Sam" considered it stupid and ineffective the situation when Russia's raw materials pass through the hands of Russian oligarchs and officials.
            Why, when can you simply own the raw material pie of Russia yourself.
            A conflict arose, thanks to which the power of Russia, President Putin realized that the fate of Libya and Gaddafi awaited them, and therefore an urgent need to "steer" back, restoring the Army and the sovereignty of Russia.
            The "sad" fate of the current Russian liberal bourgeois - oligarchs and officials, they are afraid of their own people and their "partners" in the class of exploiters - competitors of the United States and the West. And who else is the question more?

            Therefore, objectively assessing the situation, they - the ruling Russian liberals, for the sake of preserving at least part of their right to plunder Russia’s raw materials and preserving “partner” relations with the West, can agree to a treacherous conciliatory position of surrendering to Russia - a certain compromise, while satisfying both sides of the competition ...
            As the historical experience of the destruction of the USSR by the traitorous ruling elite shows, this situation is possible.
            And do not fight with Russia, exchanging nuclear strikes.
            1. SPACE
              SPACE 8 February 2016 12: 12 New
              +6
              Quote: vladimirZ
              Our ruling liberals are thinking about how to preserve their position, palaces / houses / accounts / yachts in the West, their "peaceful" relations with the West, and the right to rob Russia.

              It’s as old as the world, and under Pugachev and Stenka Razin and in 17, the proletariat probably also thought about how many rich people were killed, in 17 they brought everyone to the root altogether, the most honest people remained indifferent to wealth. And again, 25, and where do they get these rich from?))) It is time to stop raving about utopias and mocking our homeland and the state.
              Z.Y. It is not a global blow that will hit Russia, but its own ignorance and stupidity, for which it is already the last time, the wealth of the ancestors must be preserved and increased by labor, and not revolution, to the joy of inflicting diseases ...
              1. KaPToC
                KaPToC 8 February 2016 18: 35 New
                +1
                The fight against ignorance and stupidity must begin with oneself.
              2. kotvov
                kotvov 8 February 2016 18: 52 New
                +1
                the wealth of the ancestors must be preserved and increased by labor, and not revolution to the joy of inflicting diseases ... ,,
                that is, you suggest: let us rob, our, and not strangers.
                1. fotopavka
                  fotopavka 8 February 2016 19: 11 New
                  0
                  And you, therefore, prefer to be robbed by strangers after all ?!
                  To do this, you want to arrange a revolution, to alleviate the task of a stranger?
                2. Svidetel 45
                  Svidetel 45 8 February 2016 23: 11 New
                  +5
                  It’s a good call to increase the country's wealth by work, only people’s work should not turn into a monkey’s work, the work of each individual person in modern conditions is just a small link in the complex system of productive forces of the whole country, and for them to be efficient and highly productive, they must be supported by modern technologies and the high organization of this very system, and for this, smart leaders are needed, and such are not yet visible. Current ones like Medvedev, under the 15-year-old talk about the development of real production, have only ensured the effective transformation of Russia into a raw materials appendage of the West, and now also of China. Yes, in recent years, the situation in the defense industry has improved somewhat and by the 13th year some improvement in the material well-being of citizens, but this was only due to the period of high energy prices, but prices collapsed and the real results and achievements of the current leaders crawled out.
              3. RUS69
                RUS69 8 February 2016 19: 23 New
                +3
                the wealth of the ancestors must be preserved and increased by labor, and not revolution to the joy of inflicting diseases ...
                Whoever minuses you for such words is the traitor of the Motherland .. or simply weak-witted by nature.
              4. vladimirZ
                vladimirZ 11 February 2016 19: 11 New
                0
                In support of their point of view
                "American Uncle Sam" considered it stupid and ineffective the situation when Russia's raw materials pass through the hands of Russian oligarchs and officials.
                Why, when can you simply own the raw material pie of Russia yourself.
                A conflict arose, thanks to which the power of Russia, President Putin realized that the fate of Libya and Gaddafi awaited them, and therefore an urgent need to "steer" back, restoring the Army and the sovereignty of Russia.
                etc.

                accidentally found confirmation of my statements in an article on the site:
                http://interpolit.ru/blog/glazev_predlozhil_zamorozit_rubl/2016-02-05-6456

                discussing proposals of academician S. Glazyev "to freeze the ruble".
                Among those discussing, the opinion of the director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements Boris Kagarlitsky, who answered the question:
                - How long can the contradiction persist between the revival of sovereign elements on the foreign policy side and the preservation of the “mothballs” liberal course in the economy?

                The answer given by the political scientist and economist Kagarlitsky confirmed my statement on the actions of the ruling elite and Putin
                - The patriotic course in foreign policy was not the result of processes occurring in the Russian elite.
                This is a defensive reaction to political and economic aggression coming from outside.
                Built in 1990 the system of relations "older brother - younger partner" was broken by the West itself with its aggressive behavior.
                The Russian oligarchy felt like a predator, which they themselves wanted to eat. And in order to defend himself, he is forced to take a patriotic position.
                Moreover, it absolutely contradicts the internal essence of our elites, their interests. In order to survive, they have to say patriotic things from time to time.
          2. Foxmara
            Foxmara 8 February 2016 20: 00 New
            +1
            Quote: GrBear
            few of them died in a warm bed.

            The British took Kerensky out. Together with family. Trotsky though escaped, but did not help)
        4. Aleksander
          Aleksander 8 February 2016 09: 25 New
          22
          Quote: vladimirZ
          It is unlikely that anyone will be at war with Russia, militarily strong, with nuclear potential, especially with the tendency to restore the damaged


          The history of terrible unprovoked aggressive wars against Russia and the Russian people, gives Law Russia MOST strike preemptively according to the ever-present western aggressor. Russia NEVER was the first to attack. This right is suffered and deserved by Russia tens of millions of victims in those wars. She should no longer receive a terrible first blow, and then, washing herself with blood, with terrible victims, restore at least balance and only then go to victory.
          22 JUNE 1941 — NEVER REPEAT NEVER! In thousands of memoirs, memoirs of military leaders, soldiers, veterans, there was always terrible bitterness from the impossibility of returning back to June 22 to disperse planes, disguise, withdraw troops into fields, tanks, artillery and deliver a prepared blow to the aggressor at the slightest start of aggression. This terrible and bitter experience MUST be taken into account ...
          1. 97110
            97110 8 February 2016 14: 28 New
            -3
            Quote: Aleksander
            until June 22 — to disperse planes, camouflage, withdraw troops into fields, tanks, artillery and — deliver a prepared blow to the aggressor at the slightest start of aggression.
            And get not one French division on the Borodino field, but the combined forces of England, the United States and all class close. Do not paint in front of Stalin. Bleeding Hitler and the Mikada with the Aglosaxes - this is not for you to plant aircraft at airfields. Do not remember the words of Truman, about whom the states should help? So remember.
            1. Aleksander
              Aleksander 8 February 2016 20: 49 New
              +1
              Quote: 97110
              And get not one French division on the Borodino field, but the combined forces of England, the United States and all class close


              What are you ?! belay In June 41 destroyed by Hitler France, beaten by Hitler England and unarmed America just thought how to attack Russia with Hitler lol . England was severely defeated in France, Greece, Crete, the Middle East, weakened due to sea blockade, air war, and with great relief learned about the attack on the USSR.
              Winston Churchill spoke and wrote more than once that he ready to make an alliance with the devil himself, if this alliance is directed against Hitler. Churchill 22 June 1941 year: “We will never agree, we will never enter into negotiations with Hitler "... And this is so, after WHAT did Hitler with England in 1939-1941 — she couldn’t suddenly become her ally.
              PS The blow would be struck by to the German aggressor in Poland (aggression against Poland is recognized and condemned by the whole world) and no one would ever speak on the sides of the aggressor.
          2. Gorodovik
            Gorodovik 8 February 2016 16: 53 New
            +6
            And rightly, June 22 should never be repeated. But not by delivering a preventive strike, but so that no one thinks about it. And this implies not only a strong army. But also an effective foreign policy.
        5. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 8 February 2016 09: 29 New
          -2
          Quote: vladimirZ
          But to ruin Russia, like the USSR, using the fifth liberal column,

          For some reason, our liberal column is confident that the military and economic power of the United States is forever, that it is a kind of constant, not subject to the influence of time, crises and catastrophes. And we will see, we will not hurry. We will preserve the sovereignty of Russia, and there, you see, the United States will collapse like the USSR. Freedom to the enslaved peoples of America and Europe!

          The author stole from Vitali - Mikhan .. lol
        6. Victor Kamenev
          8 February 2016 10: 29 New
          +1
          Comrade wants anarchy, "ruling oligarchs" who do not suit him under US sanctions, he needs a coup d'etat and "all power to the people" ... God, you cannot bring the balabols to their senses, send them to Kiev, there they belong, there are also naive dreamed of "the power of the people" ...
          1. vladimirZ
            vladimirZ 8 February 2016 12: 06 New
            +7
            Viktor Kamenev
            Comrade does not want anarchy. The comrade wants fair elections, the criminal liability of officials, including the President of Russia, for their, if any, illegal anti-state actions in government posts; truly democratic social state.

            You yourself, what do you not assess who "rules" the Russian Government, whose interests are protected in the State Duma, through the all-powerful liberal United Russia and the liberal President Putin V.V.?
            For you, what's the secret: 90% of natural resources and industrial production belongs to 1% of the population - oligarchs and corrupt officials, or rather 150 "families" who are ready to do anything to preserve their "status quo"?

            1. 97110
              97110 8 February 2016 14: 39 New
              -3
              Quote: vladimirZ
              For you that secret
              political economy of capitalism? Or do you hope, being the seventh, to slip past three feathers?
              Quote: vladimirZ
              The comrade wants fair elections, the criminal liability of officials, including the President of Russia, for their, if any, illegal anti-state actions in government posts; truly democratic social state.

              Ask Eroshenko how it works under true democracy (the power of the American people). And everything else is not true democracy. The people are not American. And the American people will surely help him (the people) for the benefit of his elite to establish the power of the Georgians, the Baltic states, who are inexpensively sold.
        7. SPACE
          SPACE 8 February 2016 11: 56 New
          +1
          Quote: vladimirZ
          But they will try to ruin Russia, like the USSR, using the fifth liberal column.

          Of course, it is only important to determine who she is this very liberal fifth column.
          Quote: vladimirZ
          Moreover, this treacherous fifth column in state power.

          And here we have already determined, quickly however, well, if this is the case and the 5 column has been in power all these years, then the answer to why they have not ruined Russia, look at the neighbors from Ukraine, let the country go around the world for a couple of years, or maybe the 5 column is so unprofessional that for more than 15 summer time at the helm, it could not ruin the state, with unlimited financial, informational and all other help, all progressive Western mankind? But that's not all, answer also, how did the notorious 5 column entrenched in the government, dare, contrary to the will of the West, pull back the Crimea and the Donbass, as well as provide assistance to Syria with the utter destruction of the Isil peace militia? And the coolest thing? After all, according to your logic, there is no economy, since it was replaced by an oil and gas needle, there is no production because everyone was prosral and weapons cannot be, because there is no education, science and production! Yes, and even sanctions are introduced against the allegarchs))) Do you find in your vital statements some cognitive dissonance? Answer yourself, only honestly, and at the same time also to all mentally suffering, I do not need, and so I know, moreover, I know all this your primitive logic and the course of these not distant thoughts.
          Z.Y. If Russia achieved such not-so-bad indicators thanks to the wrecking of the fifth column, then let the flag in her hands, let it continue to be harmed))) But seriously, one should not be afraid of the fifth impotent column, but of its own mass, mass-political stupidity, an example in plain sight. In the end, the balabolov screamers whiners a dime a dozen, and doing things two times and miscalculated. Yes and no, and there will be no alternative, because all, no matter how outstanding they are, come to power, they will immediately fall within the framework of the same circumstances and opportunities. And if they pursue the interests of the state, then there will be no alternative, there is only one way, because the right things do not change, but the nuances that doing life is not ideal.
          1. 97110
            97110 8 February 2016 14: 56 New
            0
            Quote: SPACE
            mass mob stupidity

            Separate plus. For the comment set the usual.
          2. Svidetel 45
            Svidetel 45 8 February 2016 23: 30 New
            +6
            And no one even claims that the power in the country is wholly owned by the 5th column, it is a question of the fact that many of its representatives are in power and which do considerable harm both in the domestic and foreign policies of the country, hence often such inconsistent and ambiguous actions of the authorities, compare the changes that took place in the country over 10 years from the 30th to the 41st, and nowadays, for example, from 2005 to 2015. And at a critical moment, these elements may well play a fateful role in the fate of the country and people, as happened in the year 91.
        8. Reserve officer
          Reserve officer 8 February 2016 12: 52 New
          +7
          Quote: vladimirZ
          Pancake! Got these cheers patriots!
          Russia-USSR surrendered the Warsaw Pact to the West, surrendered its union republics, and so what? Are we left alone? The lack of care in the West of our liberal column speaks of how Russia will be "civilized" by the West - from an article

          It is unlikely that anyone will fight against Russia, which is militarily strong, with a nuclear potential, especially with a tendency to restore the military potential destroyed by Serdyukov. It is called more expensive for itself.
          They can provoke a military conflict by someone else’s hands, such as the Georgian 08.08.08., By extracting a certain political capital from it.
          But they will try to ruin Russia, like the USSR, using the fifth liberal column. Moreover, this treacherous fifth column in state power.
          This is the BASIC THREAT to Russia, and by the way, not worked out in the State Security Program. The ruling oligarchs and corrupt officials, in order to preserve part of their right to plunder Russia, can go for the surrender of state interests, betraying Russia itself and its people.


          Vladimir, thanks for the comment. The very essence.
          I just wanted to write that the main threat to Russia comes from within. Moreover, you do not have to go far for examples.
          1. alexamin68
            alexamin68 8 February 2016 19: 02 New
            +3
            Do not forget about China, they have long been eyeing new territories, Siberia, the Far East. And about the treachery and impermanence of Asians it is unnecessary to speak, this is the essence of their policy.
        9. Svidetel 45
          Svidetel 45 8 February 2016 22: 45 New
          +3
          I completely agree with you, we have plenty of representatives of the fifth column in power, and to clean it, power, as Iosif Vissarionovich did, there is, unfortunately, no one, our guarantor is so white and fluffy, a supporter of democratic values, and Stalin is the same bloody dictator for him as for all this liberoid public.
      4. rassel0889
        rassel0889 8 February 2016 11: 46 New
        +7
        Both our army and our people! I live near a military airfield, for 20 years our combat aircraft flew only on holidays, and the pilots trained with airplanes in their hands over the map. In recent years, everything has changed dramatically, and consistently. I am writing this comment, under the hum of a fighter or bomber, or attack aircraft, or maybe a cargo giant flew by. I will alarmingly tell you, they have been flying around the clock lately, they have been training at night and in any weather, of course, this is good, but on the other hand, you understand how close we are now to the "red line", and perhaps we have already crossed it, and the collision in the near future avoidable ..
        1. Tatar
          Tatar 8 February 2016 12: 58 New
          +4
          our landing in the field, air defense personnel are also on the platoon, along serpentines to Abkhazia VAIshniki. Are you going to cut through the corridor to Armenia? Is this the hour of X?
          1. glasha3032
            glasha3032 8 February 2016 15: 47 New
            +5
            Is this a response to the transfer of British troops to Jordan in the light of President Aliyev’s visit to London (apparently he flew for help)?
      5. iConst
        iConst 8 February 2016 13: 11 New
        14
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Gods are with us our land ...
        - Paganism? Gods - in the studio! By ranking ... laughing

        Russia will collapse like the Union-from the inside. So far, everything leads to that.

        Huber is changed like gloves. Moreover, only when there is already "nowhere to go".

        The strategic object - the cosmodrome - (Mlyn, what more important can you think of?) - was plundered ...

        This all speaks of the rottenness of the system. And do not blame the West for stealing there too.

        They steal, but not in such places and not so brazenly.

        A flair that has not let me down for many years says - stagnation, similar to Brezhnevsky. The same Faberge, only a side view.

        Yes, the military-industrial complex pulled up what in expensive oil. But only that.

        All billions of billions went to dust. Education - the foundation - has been successfully leaked. Restore horseradish. Next in line is medicine - half way passed.

        Preparing for the sale of the remnants of state property - preparation for the dismemberment of Russia?
        Not so long ago they were selling out - a little without nuclear power they weren't left. Barely retired.

        What few examples?
        So, the general vector is bad. And the government’s wacky dollybills are now busy guessing about the price of oil and what to cut in the first place.
      6. Evpatiy.
        Evpatiy. 8 February 2016 23: 57 New
        0
        Is that a swastika?
      7. SuperVodka777
        SuperVodka777 10 February 2016 23: 46 New
        -1
        Pi * dec. It’s clear who we are dealing with)))
    2. Dimka999
      Dimka999 8 February 2016 10: 35 New
      -2
      What is the strength in, brother? Is it about money? I think strength is in truth. Who really is stronger!))))
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 8 February 2016 19: 35 New
        +1
        In every joke there is a share of jokes.
    3. 222222
      222222 8 February 2016 10: 43 New
      +5
      as150505 (1) RU Today, 07:34 AM
      We will not bend! Our strength is in truth! "" "

      “In any war, victory is ultimately determined by the state of mind of the masses who shed their blood on the battlefield” (V. Lenin, PSS, vol. 41, p. 21).

      “Our cause is just, the enemy will be defeated, the victory will be ours”
      ((The final phrase of the appeal to the Soviet people, which the Deputy Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR V.M. Molotov read out at 12 noon on June 22, 1941 - the day the Great Patriotic War began.))
    4. larand
      larand 8 February 2016 10: 55 New
      +7
      Quote: as150505
      Do not bend! Our strength is in truth!

      "Strength in truth" is certainly beautiful for a movie, but in the context that the author talks about, strength should be in the soldiers, in tanks, in planes, missiles and other military structures. And certainly in a strong rear without rats. And if you hope for the truth, the gods and 82%, you can lose everything.
      1. SMikhalych
        SMikhalych 8 February 2016 11: 48 New
        +3
        Quote: larand
        "Strength in truth" is certainly beautiful for a movie, but in the context that the author talks about, strength should be in the soldiers, in tanks, in planes, missiles and other military structures. And certainly in a strong rear without rats. And if you hope for the truth, the gods and 82%, you can lose everything.

        I recommend everyone to listen to the end. At the time of the placement of the video (2014), Turkey only smelled slightly and that kind of friendship bully
        1. demidov.evg
          demidov.evg 10 February 2016 16: 31 New
          0
          Great! "Kulikovo Field - Russian Victory". Thank you for the video!
          To the argument of the comrades about what strength consists of ...
          Of course, it is foolish to deny that the force "should be in the soldiers, in tanks, in planes, missiles and other military structures", in "certainly in the strong rear ...". Of course!
          But it is equally foolish to deny that power lies in truth! And, if we understand by "strength" only coarse material strength, then it is not out of place to recall another popular expression: "God is not in strength, but in truth!" But where there is God, where there is truth, there is the real crushing power.
    5. demchuk.ig
      demchuk.ig 8 February 2016 17: 57 New
      +2
      Quote: as150505
      Do not bend! Our strength is in truth!

      Well, you can’t manage one truth with them! They hear only the strong!
    6. GradusHuK
      GradusHuK 9 February 2016 15: 27 New
      0
      American democracy does not take root in regions rich in "Topol"
  2. Kent0001
    Kent0001 8 February 2016 07: 35 New
    +2
    No, well, I have long believed that Europe we will instantly smash. And then we will take up the rest.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 8 February 2016 08: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: Kent0001
      No, well, I have long believed that Europe we will instantly smash. And then we will take up the rest.

      You need to start with the "REST", and the rest for a snack!
  3. GDV
    GDV 8 February 2016 07: 37 New
    0
    This is our last Chinese warning to you.
  4. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 8 February 2016 07: 43 New
    +3
    The West is clearly escalating hysteria by working through options - how to attack Russia faster and safer for itself, remembering the backup option - doesn’t ward off the flood, will we quickly surrender?
  5. with
    with 8 February 2016 07: 44 New
    +9
    Americanoids and natoids are creatures dangerous to Life on Earth, bred for "world despotism", the genetic descendants of bandits (from the crusaders who destroyed Christian Constantinople to NATO, who continue to invade the world to wreak havoc across the globe), who plundered the backward ones for centuries. from "other areas." You can't erase a gene with your finger. They have seriously "won" the Cold War, they are seriously uttering provocative boorish tirades. But apart from the hatred and fear that they are trying to instill, there is nothing behind them.
    1. cap
      cap 8 February 2016 08: 04 New
      0
      Quote: met
      You can't erase a genome with your finger. They have seriously "won" the Cold War, they are seriously uttering provocative boorish tirades. But apart from the hatred and fear that they are trying to instill, there is nothing behind them.


      Do not diminish not add you the first plus. hi
    2. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 8 February 2016 10: 36 New
      +8
      Quote: met
      They seriously "won" the Cold War, they seriously utter provocative boorish tirades

      They will answer for everything - soon
  6. Nitarius
    Nitarius 8 February 2016 07: 45 New
    39
    It's time for the Liberals to send bundles in wooden suits to the west! They don’t understand differently ... they gave me the opportunity to get out of the country alive .. And there, as they say ... who didn’t have time .. HIS PROBLEMS!
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 8 February 2016 08: 52 New
      +8
      The liberals still rule the economy - Chubais, Gref, Nabibulina and so on. Why should they dump out of the country - they live much better than patriots. And it’s not yet clear who will solve this issue there, only slogans
    2. ZIS
      ZIS 8 February 2016 10: 22 New
      +1
      You are cruel. It’s more humane to send orange orchards to the New or Northern lands and change oranges for bread ... A kilogram per kilogram.
  7. L. A. A.
    L. A. A. 8 February 2016 07: 48 New
    +3
    Need Peace on earth! This is becoming less understood in the West.
  8. with
    with 8 February 2016 07: 49 New
    16
    "It is high time for mankind to understand and accept one of the most important truths: violence breeds violence. And the path to peace and prosperity is formed by goodwill and dialogue, and the memory of the lessons of past wars, of who started them and why ... There is One very important feature is that presumptuous opponents who consider themselves to be obviously stronger, we always warn that the policy of attacking us will lead to very bad consequences for everyone - both for us and for them, moreover, to come to an agreement with us after the start of the war, to replay all back, realizing that everything went wrong, it will be impossible. Very often they do not believe us - but every time later they are convinced of our rightness. Because God is not in power, but in truth. "

    Vladimir Putin.
  9. Flinky
    Flinky 8 February 2016 08: 03 New
    +5
    The main thing is not to take prisoners. For not needed, feed them yet.
  10. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 8 February 2016 08: 04 New
    +8
    Ideas about the preservation of some regions in the event of a nuclear Western strike indicate that the author did not avoid Hollywood clichés. The West will definitely not miss our deposits, factories and research centers from the sights! Their destruction should destroy the possibility of our economy functioning, and after their "inevitable victory" the West will have orders to restore all this for itself, which seems to them to be another tasty morsel.
    And it is just as strange to think that Western people suddenly forgot for some reason what a Russian partisan is. No, they certainly haven't forgotten that! So, dear author, about the disarming blow you are ... you are greatly mistaken. We will be cut at the root. No "30 million maintenance staff". No Russians at all!
    Have you not noticed - in Germany they are already writing that aggressive strangers have moved from Russia to them, ready to overthrow the government. And this is not about "refugees" from Syria in general! So there will be a nuclear strike or not. Most likely it will be, but as a background, an external decoration. And the main one will most likely be a strike with bacteriological weapons to wipe out everyone, clean up. As soon as a microbe or virus can be targeted accurately enough so that it takes mainly carriers of the Russian genotype, they will hit us right away.
    Here they have a problem, because we are very different. But Siberia, alas, is the most vulnerable in terms of such an attack, because there is nothing to target. Just something deadly, and with a short life cycle. Kill the Siberians and disappear, and the inaccessibility of the Siberian regions will protect against the spread of viruses, until they themselves disappear by counting a given number of life cycles.
    The scenario is spooky, but, unlike "disarming strike", real.
    1. shuhartred
      shuhartred 8 February 2016 08: 23 New
      +7
      Quote: Mikhail3
      The West will definitely not miss our deposits, factories and research centers from the sights! Their destruction should destroy the possibility of our economy functioning, and after their "inevitable victory" the West will have orders to restore all this for itself, which seems to them to be another tasty morsel.

      What nafig orders. Recovery of what ???? We will simply destroy the planet and 99% of the living beings on it. There will be nothing later for us !!!
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 8 February 2016 09: 28 New
      +8
      Quote: Mikhail3
      But Siberia, alas, is the most vulnerable in terms of such an attack, because there is no need to target anything.

      laughing According to one version - they have already tried to do this - the so-called encephalitis tick, according to some scientists, this is a joint work of the Angles and Yapes from the beginning of the 20th century. But many indigenous peoples of Siberia have developed a stable immunity (natural selection), but a visitor must be vaccinated. In Siberia, given the climatic periods - long winters, short summers, something like the Zika virus is difficult to implement, influenza viruses also feel bad in the cold.
      A long and cold winter is practically an "antidote" in this case, as it gives time to prepare and time to create a vaccine. In epidemiological terms, regions with an unstable climate are much more vulnerable (the average temperature in winter is + -5 and a large crowd of people are the largest megacities).
      So what about Siberia you are mistaken - Siberia just at the moment is the most stable region, another thing that they can try to undermine from the inside. I don’t think that Europeans are eager to go to work in our Siberia, to walk in sheepskin coats and winter shoes for 8 months - this is not the most interesting occupation, the Chinese also do not crave. Swamps, midges, mosquitoes, snow in winter, frosts up to 60 degrees.
      Therefore, they will not touch Siberia, and if possible they will try to leave the population, but someone should work for them and serve the fields.
    3. tsvetkov1274
      tsvetkov1274 8 February 2016 09: 34 New
      +2
      Zika virus is already being tried on blacks .. Afraid of pregnancy. Plus mine.
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 8 February 2016 11: 43 New
        +8
        Quote: tsvetkov1274
        Zika virus is already being tried on blacks .. Afraid of pregnancy

        As the saying goes "completely in the hole", the Zika virus is very similar to a tool for containing or exterminating a population (well, or another gift from pharmacologists in an attempt to make money on a vaccine), in my opinion, Americans also created Ebola and tested it in Africa.
    4. Klos
      Klos 8 February 2016 19: 15 New
      0
      In the event of a mutual nuclear strike, everyone will get a kirda. Without options
  11. aba
    aba 8 February 2016 08: 05 New
    +4
    In general, Russia has nothing to lose today. Russia-USSR surrendered the Warsaw Pact to the West, surrendered its union republics, and so what? Are we left alone?

    This is the biggest disaster in the history of the USSR. Even the Second World War fades into the background, however, I do not mean that the events of 1941-1945 are less significant. From that battle the USSR emerged victorious.
  12. dmikras
    dmikras 8 February 2016 08: 09 New
    +1
    "In a situation of propaganda aggression, the" human factor "may be superimposed on a failure in the computer networks of the RF Ministry of Defense, or some other accident, and the West itself may receive the first" disarming "humane blow."
    Who threw the boots on the remote
    Or maybe this America was not
  13. cap
    cap 8 February 2016 08: 13 New
    +6
    They hope to sit behind a puddle as always. As before.
    Russia has everything to give all characters a worthy rebuff! (Click)
  14. Same lech
    Same lech 8 February 2016 08: 15 New
    +9
    The task of our liberals is to generate pro-Western decadent sentiments in Russia, and to justify the need for Russia to retreat to the West


    Absolutely right...
    GREF's performance just fits into that outline.
    The West wants to destroy our country with our own hands.
    What can we do in this case?
    The answer, as always, can be found in our history ... only aggressive coercion to peace will make the WEST talk on equal terms with us ....
    In no case should one give slack in any matters ... this retreat in the WEST is instantly used as their victory ...
    The struggle and only the struggle for our freedom and independence will give us a chance not to slide into the abyss of nothingness.
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 8 February 2016 19: 04 New
      +3
      GREF’s performance just fits this outline. ,,
      oh well, gref, he seems to be not a government official. here is another great privatizer, dvorkovich, ready to sell half of the state property, but in essence distribute his own.
  15. shinobi
    shinobi 8 February 2016 08: 24 New
    +2
    Well, they always made plans for the attack, things are still there. Rhetoric is needed in order to shove the troops withdrawn after Iraq and Afghanistan somewhere. The USA will become a problem at home even worse than illegal immigrants. Actually, they are already becoming, Vietnam’s syndrome is repeating. Well and elections in the United States, they will be held and much will be forgotten. Speech will change, not fundamentally, but emotions will be less. NATO? And what about NATO? Without the USA, it’s just a bunch of papers. And the USA itself will never fight with Russia. All the more now.
  16. lexx2038
    lexx2038 8 February 2016 08: 29 New
    17
    Those who knew how it all ends are gone, we will probably have to teach new Europeans again.
    ROAD TO STALINGRAD.
    1. ILIA
      ILIA 8 February 2016 09: 24 New
      +7
      It’s possible how you can do it without us ... It’s necessary that they fight among themselves ..)
    2. RomanS
      RomanS 8 February 2016 12: 01 New
      +4
      Only among the dead are many defenders. The fact is unfortunately.
  17. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 8 February 2016 08: 30 New
    +8
    The fact that the West has long begun informational preparations for war is, as they say, a medical fact. But I strongly doubt that Russia will be able to strike the first blow. It is unlikely that our leadership will decide on this, and not in our traditions.
  18. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 8 February 2016 08: 31 New
    +8
    And one more moment. What is happening fits into the European mentality. That is, in the usual power model. As you know, the power is clear in Europe now - pure booth, and with hangover clowns. And if so, then again secret, so ancient and self-confident in Europe, advanced to the levers of power.
    So the technology is being used that is used by secret rulers, namely, terrible ones, accompanied by horrific victims and destruction of actions, for which there seems to be no one to blame, it seems to be on its own. So what should happen?
    The United States is striking us. In response, we wash away their coasts, forever excluding the United States from the great powers. Who did win? That's how it is. And Europe still has the opportunity to expand to the east, which they have dreamed of for thousands of years. The Chinese will be contained by diseases from which they will not have "keys". And the Europeans will! A very, very likely scenario, that's how they always reasoned.
  19. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 8 February 2016 08: 32 New
    +6
    this is called the preparation of the western man in the street for a sudden "disarming" NATO attack on Russia, and its justification
    And who then will explain to this layman why he will have to restore Russia's infrastructure and live in cold barracks in unsanitary conditions until his death in a bowl of cereal a day?
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 8 February 2016 14: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: Volzhanin
      this is called the preparation of the western man in the street for a sudden "disarming" NATO attack on Russia, and its justification
      And who then will explain to this layman why he will have to restore Russia's infrastructure and live in cold barracks in unsanitary conditions until his death in a bowl of cereal a day?

      And it will be, according to their plan, not the infrastructure of Russia, but already their infrastructure! And each of them will be encouraged by the fact that supposedly he will receive a large piece of property. Remember, Russians are not needed. There will be no Russians who are not bomb, that disease.
      And slaves will be brought in plenty. Here, though, those blacks that now for half a mash of pottage, ships are cut with scissors. Will the blacks freeze? Well ...
  20. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 8 February 2016 08: 36 New
    +5
    The West needs Russia to calibrate it. And our liberal convoy also needs it very much ...

    As the warrant officer from the film "DMB" said: "The time will come with a bang ..." The West, of course, desperately needs to be finally put in its place. But for this, there is still the Foreign Ministry, which is simply obliged to answer this, and not only in the Russian media, which in the West are read exclusively by specialists. But for the so-called. It is time for the "liberals" to be taken seriously, they have gone too far. They harm the state no less than Western thugs
  21. 31rus
    31rus 8 February 2016 08: 38 New
    +2
    Dear, there is no one who will not fight globally with Russia, all this PR, just to enrich themselves even more for a certain circle of persons, corporations, but economic and ideological war, here is the main theater of "military actions", so answer the question the president himself criticizes the West, and the model of the economy and the development of society is Western, again, all business in Russia is with Western capital, so where are we striving and what are we focusing on? Yes, you can talk a lot about patriotism, about import substitution, and a lot on the painful, but persistently do your job
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 8 February 2016 08: 55 New
      10
      Quote: 31rus
      Dear, no one will not fight globally with Russia

      21 June 1941 years, many in the USSR said that Germany would not attack. History is cyclical in your case.
      1. 31rus
        31rus 8 February 2016 10: 02 New
        +1
        Dear Alexander, this is an information war, to intimidate, blame, distorted facts, drag into an arms race, etc., all these clowns from NATO and the USA are just a screen, and in Europe and the USA they perfectly understand that a global war will begin but economically weaken, discord, try to conduct a color revolution under the guise, that’s the point of their policy towards Russia, we’ll continue to live until someone first falls
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 8 February 2016 12: 11 New
          +3
          Quote: 31rus
          Dear Alexander, this is an information war, to intimidate, blame, distorted facts, drag into an arms race, etc.

          We can sleep well, right?
          Quote: 31rus
          and in Europe and in the USA, they are well aware that a global war will begin,

          I doubt it
      2. Aleksey_K
        Aleksey_K 8 February 2016 12: 29 New
        -5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: 31rus
        Dear, no one will not fight globally with Russia

        21 June 1941 years, many in the USSR said that Germany would not attack. History is cyclical in your case.

        Neither Germany nor the USSR in 1941 had nuclear weapons. Therefore, Germany attacked the USSR, because She believed that the USSR was weaker than Germany and would not use chemical weapons. If the USSR has nuclear weapons, it is not yet known who would attack anyone. Such plans in the USSR (attacks on Germany even without nuclear weapons) were also hatched.
        1. Mikhail Krapivin
          Mikhail Krapivin 8 February 2016 15: 08 New
          +2
          And without nuclear weapons, attacking a huge, multi-resource and populous USSR was crazy for Germany. It would be much more logical to tear Britain to shreds and divide the rest of the world with the USSR, locking the United States within its borders. But the great ones and the melobrites fussed, what they pressed, where they pulled, and Germany committed the longest and bloody suicide in history. Now they are pushing and pulling again, in Turkey. What will happen next?
        2. kotvov
          kotvov 8 February 2016 19: 13 New
          +2
          Such plans in the USSR (attacks on Germany even without nuclear weapons) were also hatched. ,,
          Congratulations, you are clearly impressed by the Mlecin, the whistleblower. You at least know that ANY General Staff has a development in the blank for the case of ANY actions of a potential adversary. If you do not understand this, at least ask.
  22. mpzss
    mpzss 8 February 2016 08: 43 New
    +1
    as they said in our army: Dembel is inevitable, like the collapse of capitalism!
    But seriously, while Russia is in its own border and has nuclear weapons, the Americans will leave us only if we do not make America our region or put our government there! and this can be done either by revolution, or as with Germany in 1945 ... let them choose!
  23. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 8 February 2016 08: 54 New
    10
    Description from Gumilyov.

    Offense.

    The country that could be a paradise
    Became a den of fire.
    We are approaching the fourth day,
    We have not eaten for four days.

    But do not be earthly
    In this terrible and bright hour,
    Because the word of the Lord
    Better bread feeds us.

    And drenched in blood week
    Dazzling and light.
    Shrapnel rushes over me
    Birds soar blades.

    I scream and my voice is wild.
    This copper strikes copper.
    I, the bearer of great thought,
    I can not, I can not die.

    Like thunder hammers
    Or waves of angry seas
    Golden heart of Russia
    Rhythmically beats in my chest.


    And so sweet to win the Victory,
    Like a girl in pearls
    Walking on the smoke trail
    Retreating enemy.
  24. SergeyIV
    SergeyIV 8 February 2016 08: 56 New
    +4
    I would advise the author to put his thoughts in order, otherwise reading the article gives the impression that he has porridge in his head. He made conclusions from the ZSMI publications that were almost correct, but his thoughts jumped in the wrong direction. Yes, such publications in the press are designed to prepare public opinion, they have several goals:
    1 Show the aggressiveness of Russia (should cause fear of Russia and its bloodthirstiness)
    2 Show that the West has the ability to resist, but the "free" citizens of Europe need to bend down a little more and pay the United States (Europeans, and Americans, too, must humbly donate their money to Washington's War Machine)
    3 They downgrade the danger of nuclear weapons, as if to say - look this is not Armageddon, this is just a powerful weapon, here it is effective against a ship, not scary against a city - the majority will survive (Europeans and Americans should not be afraid of using nuclear weapons, they should realize that they are it is not catastrophic that, in the event of a US attack on Russia, an uncontrollable panic would not arise in the "civilized" west).
    1. Victor Kamenev
      8 February 2016 10: 23 New
      -1
      In your head, I see some platitudes ...
      1. Fat
        Fat 8 February 2016 13: 40 New
        0
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        In your head, I see some platitudes ...

        A banal article and suggests a "banal" discussion. Did you have a lot of extraordinary thoughts? Share, Dear ...
  25. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 8 February 2016 09: 00 New
    +2
    Well, questions to the author)
    Italian journalists and American generals came to the conclusion that a preventive strike on Kaliningrad will not bring the desired results, is too well protected, unfortunately?
    And what kind of fortifications are there such that NATO cannot master the whole whole? A link can be made by pro-American generals and Italian journalists))) direct haberdashery and cardinal)
    Russia is trying to warn the West about the consequences, which is also why the military operation of the Russian air forces in Syria is being carried out - this is a demonstration of Russia's military capabilities. That, for example, what could happen in Ukraine if Russia would have to carry out a peacekeeping operation there to disarm Bandera neo-Nazi forces. In order not to have to use the videoconferencing system in Ukraine, Russia is conducting demonstrative military exercises in Syria.
    In general, it’s more logical, at first, to deal with Bandera at hand, than to send signals to the West in Syria.

    In the summer of 2015, some American generals said bluntly that American missiles and Bandera bayonets would smash Russia.
    Again, some American generals - you can specifically name the names with quotations. This is the first time I have heard such a statement. And then the author uses "American generals" as "British scientists".
  26. Sargord A.
    Sargord A. 8 February 2016 09: 05 New
    0
    Quote: GrBear
    what our liberals think about - advanced wrestlers

    About his fee in foreign currency for the next performance.
  27. VeterS
    VeterS 8 February 2016 09: 08 New
    +3
    "... What they think at the same time, it is not clear, since in the event of the Great War, Ukraine will become the main field of this war, and what it will turn into is hard to even imagine. ..."

    It is difficult to imagine, but, incidentally, that there would be no illusions among the enemy and his population, to tell them what will be not only possible, but also necessary. And so, first and foremost, all NATO bases of the first, most dangerous line are destroyed in the first seconds of hostilities. The second and subsequent ones are destroyed in the first minutes of the outbreak of hostilities. Further, in order to make the advance of their troops, their supply and replenishment of manpower as difficult as possible, BURN OUT entire countries on the principle of carpet destruction and nuclear contamination. Etc. The main thing is that the West should REMEMBER, there will be no war, there will be total DESTRUCTION of everything that crawls, flies and floats. By the way, to solve the English verbiage, an "average" bomb will be enough, one from which the island will "float away" into the fogs of geographical history ...
    Yes, more ... The Fifth Column and the alarmists who joined them and just crap, accustomed to living according to the principle, "I don’t agree," and so the answer to them is this: penalty companies are 100% guaranteed to you (this is at best).
  28. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 8 February 2016 09: 22 New
    +3
    They (the West) think that the war will be according to their plan .. high-precision strikes, air supremacy, the actions of the "fifth column" together with their special forces and the obedience of the population. Nakosya-bite!
  29. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 8 February 2016 09: 25 New
    +2
    And the President is ours, a liberal! And even this does not hide. Yes, a patriot. But, as the people say, Putin is too little Putin.
  30. Aleksander
    Aleksander 8 February 2016 09: 31 New
    +8
    Before WWI and WWII, everyone also thought that they were IMPOSSIBLE — well, who in their right mind would start killing and dying — with the terrible weapons of murder existing then (machine guns, airplanes, tanks, etc.)? However, they did happen. Today the situation is the same, people think the same, but meanwhile, the war is close. The UN has degraded, just like the League of Nations before WWII, the tool for resolving disputes WITHOUT war breaks down, the West has the temptation and the illusory opportunity to resolve the issue "immediately" and "forever."
    Only the clearly expressed threat of the destruction of the West and its inevitability can stop the west.
    1. lubesky
      lubesky 9 February 2016 01: 00 New
      +1
      Quote: Aleksander
      Before the WWII and WWII, it also seemed to everyone that they-IMPOSSIBLE-

      As for WWII, I agree. But as for the PMV - accurate to the contrary. Refresh your knowledge of the public mood of ordinary people on the eve of this terrible war. Do not forget also that the devastating and protracted nature of the WWII, the capabilities of modern weapons, layered defense, etc. - were a big surprise, even for officers of the general staffs of the warring countries. And the PMV itself was dreaming of simple euro-producers from newspapers, like a breath of fresh air, a solution to the accumulated problems, a fun and swift walk through enemy territory (moreover, it was equally easy and naive from the layman of any power). The disappointment in the new format of the war has yet to become bitterness in the mouth and hearts of millions of ordinary soldiers ...
  31. Patriot 771
    Patriot 771 8 February 2016 09: 38 New
    +3
    Being prepared for everything is our credo. If we do not forget about it, everything will be fine. Train and train.
  32. Alex ..
    Alex .. 8 February 2016 09: 57 New
    +9
    I’m not sure that they are ready to really face Russia.
  33. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 8 February 2016 10: 11 New
    +2
    It is dangerous to wake a bear in winter. The consequences are not predictable ...
  34. Victor Kamenev
    8 February 2016 10: 18 New
    +2
    Those who say that "Putin is not enough of Putin" should be sent to one place in Crimea so that they do not consider themselves Napoleons. And experts on Gataullina. A friend should be close, and keep the enemy even closer, this is not about Gataullina, but, perhaps, about the Gref-Chubais. Our friends in "Putin's Secret Wealth" just said that Putin nationalized everything, took everything away from the "right owners" under ... a liberal economy. With whom do you stand in solidarity against Putin, and with different argumentation ?! This is schizophrenia!

    As for the links to the materials - Google will help you, and the presumption of the author. I am not a Stratfor in terms of resources ... But for what I have said, I answer.
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 8 February 2016 19: 19 New
      0
      it’s not about Gataullina, but maybe about Gref-Chubais. ,,
      and do not you think that these GF expensive country?
  35. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf 8 February 2016 10: 22 New
    -2
    Who should strike in the West? The pro-American elite ruling in Russia? Do not tell my heels. They spit on us, and we stand under the visor. What are the blows?
  36. thinker
    thinker 8 February 2016 10: 25 New
    +3
    At that time, analysts of “aggressive Russia” got into their mouth like water, and they are afraid to say a word in the characteristic “aggressive manner”.

    Dmitry Kiselev, “News of the Week”
    “In the late 1980s and early 1990s, like many of my colleagues, I considered the BBC journalistic standard to be the reference standard, and then they were equal to it. The loss of illusions occurred gradually and through internal resistance. And now without options - The BBC is just rubbish, they burned themselves, the internal standard is dirt. ”
    1. 31rus
      31rus 8 February 2016 11: 03 New
      +5
      By the way, it turns out that during the USSR there was no patriotism, there was only ideology, but now according to Kiselyov 100% are patriots, the question is where did the militants come to ISIS, including from the Russian Caucasus, where 5,6 came from, columns
  37. Wanderer 2008
    Wanderer 2008 8 February 2016 10: 28 New
    0
    Quote: Mikhail3
    The scenario is spooky, but, unlike "disarming strike", real.
    You, dear Mikhail, terrible scenarios work out well.
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 8 February 2016 14: 14 New
      0
      Quote: Wanderer 2008
      Quote: Mikhail3
      The scenario is spooky, but, unlike "disarming strike", real.
      You, dear Mikhail, terrible scenarios work out well.

      So what war can be still against us? We are not giving up. If we don’t push us to the end, we will all slam. The West should already have learned this lesson. They invented humanism there for export (and upon closer examination there is nothing worse than humanism), but Western people themselves act extremely pragmatically and without the slightest pity for anyone other than themselves.
      So there can be nothing fluffy in the scenarios of tough confrontation, excuse me.
  38. Lator kron
    Lator kron 8 February 2016 10: 38 New
    +3
    After all, they’ll finish the game, if it doesn’t really reach that then the whole world is in ruins and the planet earth will not be suitable for life.
    And if any bastard survives, of those who arranged it, then he will be tormented until his death fiercely and hopelessly.
    Will the bunkers save? underground cities? loot? og ..))
    It’s the same as flying into outer space in one spacesuit, with a supply of oxygen behind on a leash for about 1000 (thousand) years, but what's the point? how to function eat drink sleep etc? Well, they will live for about 50-100 years. They will give offspring, and who will they be? dungeons? in addition to the destruction of the planet, nuclear winter will also be nuclear contamination. And how long will it all last? when will the surface become habitable? in 100-500 years? or never?
    It is interesting what all these figures who so stubbornly strive for this ending count on.
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 8 February 2016 16: 57 New
      +3
      Quote: Lator Kron
      ... It is interesting what all these figures who so stubbornly strive for this ending count on.


      Because of their narrow-mindedness, they cannot calculate anything. Just fed up on Hollywood films about the invincibility and superhumanity of a single nation, they believed that they could survive between a rock and a hard place (it is possible to frighten to a shiver, it is possible to sit out in bunkers). This is their kind of life: they feel bad when others live well. It’s useless to talk with this mold, there’s nothing to talk about, you just need to fight with them (if you have to!) To the bitter end, otherwise it will constantly appear wherever it falls, poisoning the healthy shoots of the future at the most inopportune time ...
      hi
  39. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 8 February 2016 11: 34 New
    0
    I am not talking about foreign policy. What prevents Putin from being Putin domestically?
    Quote: Victor Kamenev
    Those who say that "Putin is not enough of Putin" should be sent to one place in Crimea so that they do not consider themselves Napoleons.
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 8 February 2016 14: 23 New
      +7
      Somehow, Catherine the Great gathered a large meeting (if it’s modern), wanting to find ways to abolish the outdated serfdom. Since the state took over the right of the fortress for a long time, the restrictions imposed by it lost their meaning and began to slow down the development of the country.
      And what did she hear from all classes and groups (not peasants, of course)? Slaves! Slaves! SLAVES !! The temptation of idleness on slavery was too strong. Not seeing any support, the empress was forced to curtail the project.
      Putin is a virtuoso on the world stage because there are different groups with different interests, that is, energy for movement. And the consequences of the 90x reforms are such that there is practically no maneuver inside the country. Between thieves-officials and thieves-bandits, who have become big businessmen and oligarchs, there are too few differences and heterogeneous ideas to be able to actively do something.
      Where is the strongest support for the development of the country? Developing your pocket is a priority! The country is, of course, not bad. But the pocket is immeasurably better! Carriers of other opinions are simply being killed. Out of great mercy, it only happens that they plant them, having taken away everything.
      It is necessary to become Stalin, and besides, Stalin forged more than 20 years of people before he really took power in the right volume. And from whom to fetter Putin a new NKVD? Eh ...
  40. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 8 February 2016 11: 51 New
    +4
    Russia is a huge self-sufficient country and it is necessary to conduct foreign policy in accordance with its status !!! Listen less, let alone make excuses, to Western comrades, for how many of them they "beat" they harbored grudge for centuries. The symbol of our state is a bear, a big strong owner who does not touch anyone until he is provoked, all European "animals" should think about this.
  41. cergey51046
    cergey51046 8 February 2016 12: 09 New
    +3
    What do you worry, they are from bsslnoy malice. Their time is running out, and ours is coming. A lot of anger will accumulate and the volcano will restore order.
  42. minirulet
    minirulet 8 February 2016 13: 52 New
    0
    Quote: Aleksander
    Quote: vladimirZ
    It is unlikely that anyone will be at war with Russia, militarily strong, with nuclear potential, especially with the tendency to restore the damaged


    The history of terrible unprovoked aggressive wars against Russia and the Russian people, gives Law Russia MOST strike preemptively according to the ever-present western aggressor. Russia NEVER was the first to attack. This right is suffered and deserved by Russia tens of millions of victims in those wars. She should no longer receive a terrible first blow, and then, washing herself with blood, with terrible victims, restore at least balance and only then go to victory.
    22 JUNE 1941 — NEVER REPEAT NEVER! In thousands of memoirs, memoirs of military leaders, soldiers, veterans, there was always terrible bitterness from the impossibility of returning back to June 22 to disperse planes, disguise, withdraw troops into fields, tanks, artillery and deliver a prepared blow to the aggressor at the slightest start of aggression. This terrible and bitter experience MUST be taken into account ...

    Something I hear more and more often such proposals about a preventive strike by Russia. Do you even understand the difference between a preemptive strike and a strike in response to aggression? As I understand it, the Goebbels case lives on. Listen to Kiselev less. Think with your head. NOBODY in their right mind in the 21st century will strike a nuclear power! Even North Korea won't think of that. For this is the end of humanity. But a "preventive" strike against a neighboring state will be perceived as an act of aggression on our part, with all the ensuing consequences. So do not have such stupid thoughts, whoever climbs up to us, he rakes off. It has always been and will be so.
  43. uskrabut
    uskrabut 8 February 2016 14: 21 New
    10
    I would like to devote our liberals to a terrible secret. The West needs them while there is Russia. Russia will end, all the trash will not be needed, and the stolen money will be taken away by the Saxons. I always remember an episode from "The Golden Calf", when Bender dumped with gold across the border. What happened there? That's right, they took the gold, slapped it on the hara (ribs). laughing
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 8 February 2016 17: 04 New
      +3
      Quote: uskrabut
      I would like to initiate our liberals into a terrible secret ...


      Enough to dedicate someone. You just need to approach such people and ask what they specifically have done for their Fatherland today. If the answer is not comprehensible, send them to work on improvement: we have a lot of talkers, and there are a shortage of janitors and road workers ... yes
  44. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 8 February 2016 15: 18 New
    +3
    A preemptive strike is not certain, but it is imperative to show the determination of its delivery. At every corner, constantly talk about our intention to take the rest of the world with us, to constantly publish maps of localization of strikes in the press, so that the whole world understands that no one will be able to sit out. Alphabetically: Australia - 100 warheads, Austria - 20, Albania - 10, Britain - 100 and so on. And then we sit, silent, mislead partners about their true intentions. And then someone will say on the wreckage of the world - well, the Russians didn’t warn that they were serious, we wouldn’t contact them at such a price ..
    1. polkovnik manuch
      polkovnik manuch 9 February 2016 08: 57 New
      +1
      Common sense, sobering hot heads, is in your statement, but what does Austria have to do with it (one of the most reliable partners of Russia).
      1. demidov.evg
        demidov.evg 10 February 2016 18: 10 New
        0
        We will not exchange for all sorts of Australia and Albania either.
    2. Vyatsky
      Vyatsky 9 February 2016 11: 43 New
      0
      I think that there is no need to tell at all angles. We ourselves will form the image of "Aggressive Russia". I think we just need to explain to the real masters of the Western world (the Bilderberg Club, for example) through the mouth of the top management that if something happens, "the hand will not flinch." The fear of the population is nothing to them, fear for their own life is much more effective.
  45. Mentat
    Mentat 8 February 2016 15: 30 New
    +2
    Quote: vladimirZ
    GrBear (1)

    Our ruling liberals are thinking about how to preserve their position, palaces / houses / accounts / yachts in the West, their "peaceful" relations with the West, and the right to rob Russia.
    It is in this "right to rob Russia" that they have a conflict with the West, imperialist competition for raw materials markets.
    Today's Russia no longer has ideological contradictions with the West, and here and there, the ideology of the "golden calf" is capitalism.
    Until a certain time, years so "the end of Serdyukovschina", our bourgeois (it's time to get used to this class term) thought that they were accepted into the ranks of the moneybags of the West, and therefore their government destroyed its Army, fearing "a man with a gun", hoping for "friendly" relations with the West, especially since they invested their capital there, supporting the US economy, buying houses and palaces there, transporting their families.

    But "American Uncle Sam" considered it stupid and ineffective the situation when Russia's raw materials pass through the hands of Russian oligarchs and officials.
    Why, when can you simply own the raw material pie of Russia yourself.
    A conflict arose, thanks to which the power of Russia, President Putin realized that the fate of Libya and Gaddafi awaited them, and therefore an urgent need to "steer" back, restoring the Army and the sovereignty of Russia.
    The "sad" fate of the current Russian liberal bourgeois - oligarchs and officials, they are afraid of their own people and their "partners" in the class of exploiters - competitors of the United States and the West. And who else is the question more?

    Therefore, objectively assessing the situation, they - the ruling Russian liberals, for the sake of preserving at least part of their right to plunder Russia’s raw materials and preserving “partner” relations with the West, can agree to a treacherous conciliatory position of surrendering to Russia - a certain compromise, while satisfying both sides of the competition ...
    As the historical experience of the destruction of the USSR by the traitorous ruling elite shows, this situation is possible.
    And do not fight with Russia, exchanging nuclear strikes.

    In fact, it was the people of President Putin who brought the oligarchs to life in the 90s and early 2000s. These are different groups of people. The epoch and point in this story is Khodorkovsky’s landing as a symbol of the end of the oligarchy’s claims for political leadership and control of the security forces (and, in fact, for pulling Russia to “private territories”).

    So you interfere with flies with cutlets. Why are you doing this is another question.
    1. vladimirZ
      vladimirZ 8 February 2016 16: 16 New
      +4
      In fact, it was the people of President Putin who brought the oligarchs to life in the 90s and early 2000s.
      - Mentat

      "The people of President Putin" after "bringing to life" the oligarchs of the 90s, themselves became oligarchs.
      They did not carry out this "work" for the sake of Russia and its people, they redistributed the former state public property from one private pocket to another, with even greater robbery of the state and the people, with even greater impoverishment of the people, turning the state into a great feeding trough for those in power.
      Why are you doing this is another question

      That's somehow so that people understand that some robbers of the oligarchs were replaced by others.
      1. Rivares
        Rivares 9 February 2016 04: 25 New
        -1
        Quote: vladimirZ
        That's somehow so that people understand that some robbers of the oligarchs were replaced by others.

        From your picture it turns out ... that under Yeltsin it was precisely the country that was plundered (90-2000 minimum of the rich in Russia, i.e. the funds were withdrawn from the country), and under Putin they began to get rich, incl. and oligarchs, and reserves for gold reserves also began to grow under him.
        By the way, judging by your obsession with the poor and the rich, you will propose to rob the rich and become rich yourself and "justly" steer)) Or you will propose that you will distribute all such poor, taken away to the poor from the train stations and gypsies, as well as not allow anyone to have wealth? It seems that at 17 we went through this ...
  46. Bayun
    Bayun 8 February 2016 15: 50 New
    +5
    Today, due to the complete lack of moral guidelines among the authorities and the highest military personnel around the world (everyone first of all serves himself, is potentially corrupt and is internally ready for treason). Yes, forgive me, those "not destroyed by war" who "HONOR". With such "commanders" the Great War is IMPOSSIBLE. When Lions, Bears, Tigers and Eagles are used to EATING DELICIOUSLY, they themselves will most likely be devoured by mice, rats and flocks of crows. Nuclear claws and armored fangs are useless when the inner law has decayed in the heart ...
  47. dmb91
    dmb91 8 February 2016 16: 18 New
    +1
    [We will preserve the sovereignty of Russia] We still have to live up to sovereignty and much more needs to be done.
  48. Caramba
    Caramba 8 February 2016 16: 49 New
    0
    In such cases, you need to beat first.
  49. Balagan
    Balagan 8 February 2016 17: 44 New
    +1
    Gee-gee, well, just to troll NATO members - to show on RT a film about a preemptive strike on all NATO countries at the same time, well, for example, for insulting Russia in the person of the president. hi
    1. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 10 February 2016 19: 31 New
      0
      The radio broadcast of the "War of the Worlds" caused mega panic, and you are suggesting this. Have you forgotten that they are on duty stoned at the "nuclear button"? ))
  50. Old warrior
    Old warrior 8 February 2016 18: 08 New
    +4
    As, at one time, the author of "The Scarlet Flower" I.S. Aksakov: "If there is a whistle and din about the lust for power and the gripping lust of Russia, you should know that some Western European state is preparing the most shameless seizure of someone else's land." (C)

    The only thing the West does not think about is that after the disappearance of Russia thirty years will pass and the White Race will disappear forever.