The historic meeting of the heads of the Orthodox and Catholic churches will be held in Cuba

121
Historical The meeting between the Patriarch of Moscow and the Pope will take place on February 12 in Cuba. A historical meeting can be called if only because there have never been any direct official contacts between the heads of the Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches in the history of two branches of Christianity. The press service of the Moscow Patriarchate reports that the meeting between Patriarch Kirill and Pope Francis will be held in a special hall of Jose Marti Airport.

According to the channel "Russia24", the main issues to be discussed by the two supreme clerics will be the issues of persecution of Christians in different regions of the world, including the Middle East, as well as problems with growing territories of instability, carrying great threats to the Christian (and not only Christian) civilization.

Following the meeting, it is expected that a joint declaration will be signed on the issues mentioned.

The historic meeting of the heads of the Orthodox and Catholic churches will be held in Cuba


Preparations for the meeting between the Patriarch of Moscow and the Pope have been confirmed both in the ROC and in the Vatican Secretariat. The meeting will be held in the format of a tour of two Christian leaders in Latin America. Patriarch Kirill will be touring from 11 to 22 February. Cuba is one of the points of the pastoral visit.
  • www.optina-pustin.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    5 February 2016 14: 56
    The necessary unification amid the development of radical Islam.
    1. +3
      5 February 2016 15: 00
      What does radical Islam have to do with it? It is a sign for the whole world and a weapon of agitation for brainless fighters. For that matter, this is a catalytic US balamutite BV. So why is it such a union then with the Catholics? There are no religious wars, all are much more pragmatic.
      1. +13
        5 February 2016 15: 01
        Sophisticated is the topic!
        1. +12
          5 February 2016 15: 06
          The necessary unification amid the development of radical Islam.

          We are different.
          There will be no association.
          The meeting will be.
          They got to the point that the former Pope retired.
          For them it is "work" !!!
          I do not understand this!
          We are different.
          1. +19
            5 February 2016 15: 12
            Quote: AGAIN
            The necessary unification amid the development of radical Islam.

            Unnecessary union!
            With gay marriage promoters!
            Crowds of Catholic priests, pedophiles (and this is only official!)
            In their opinion, God can be bought off!
            He sinned, confessed, "received the Holy Communion" and more!
            I don’t remember watching the film — a boy came to church and tells the priest I did poorly; as a result, a man died. Do you know how the priest answered?
            - Read the prayer of the Virgin Mary for the night 15 times and you will be forgiven! SO SIMPLE!!!!

            They are sitting in a church, as if a favor to GOD!

            NO! NO! And again NO !!! perverts perverted the church, FAITH !!!

            If Orthodoxy is soiled, then there will be no good communication with Islam !!!
            1. +8
              5 February 2016 15: 25
              Quote: Pravdarm
              With gay marriage promoters!

              The current Catholic pontiff is against such marriages.
              The first ever dad from the New World and the first in more than 1200 years dad not from Europe.
              1. +2
                5 February 2016 15: 42
                Quote: Sid.74
                The current Catholic pontiff is against such marriages.

                BUT...!
                1. +6
                  5 February 2016 16: 25
                  Explain to me then, how is this possible?
                  The chief says: You can’t!
                  But subordinates still do and even more!
                  And not even laid off and bonuses are not without!
                  What the hell for x ... ?????
                  1. +7
                    5 February 2016 18: 10
                    Quote: Pravdarm
                    But subordinates still do and even more!
                    And not even laid off and bonuses are not without!

                    The words of the Vatican are not EU laws. Europe has lost faith in God ... just like the USA.

                    Moreover, in the United States there is officially a devil church. And this is drama. People themselves bring trouble.
                    1. +2
                      5 February 2016 18: 20
                      Quote: Sid.74 in the USA officially there is a devil's church.

                      The Church of Satan was founded at Walpurgis Night (April 30) of the 1966 of the year in San Francisco by Anton Sandor LaVey, later the author of The Satanic Bible (1969). 1966 was named by him the first year of the Satanic era. LaVey was the high priest of the Church of Satan until his death (1966 — 1997). Not only.
                      In the fall of 2004, the British Armed Forces officially register the first Satanist, Technical Service Sergeant Chris Cranmer, on the frigate Cumberland. And.
                      On June 6 on June 2014, the Bozhychi religious organization (Church of Satan) (Ukrainian. Religion community “Bozhichi”) was officially registered in the village of Pastoral, Cherkasy Region, “openly and legally, based on the Constitution of Ukraine, professing devil worship " led by S.V. Neboga ("Sorcerer of Neboga", "Agoben").
                      USA is not alone.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                  2. +5
                    5 February 2016 18: 22
                    Catholicism in Europe has long been bent, and the Vatican is a large museum. At the same time, there are enough Catholics in Latin America and southern, as well as in other third world countries. Here you can establish cooperation with them. But in Europe it seems necessary to send missionaries, as to the Gentiles.
              2. +5
                5 February 2016 17: 11
                Come on, let them meet, after which Ragnarok should begin, for there was a mutual anathema. On the other hand, both met with the Islamists and even ... rabbis and nothing, there are theological differences, and with the latter, well, as Mel Gibson's dad said ...
                1. +2
                  5 February 2016 17: 38
                  Quote: hrych there are theological differences, and with the latter, well, as Mel Gibson's dad said ...

                  I don’t know who, how, but the film watched with pleasure how Catholics (Scots) Protestants love laughing
                  1. +3
                    5 February 2016 21: 20
                    When William Wallace (Years of Life: 1270-1305) fought with English women, they were also Catholics. Only Henry VIII (who beheaded the wife of Anna Boleyn, mother of Elizabeth I not to be confused with the current second) in 1534 proclaimed the independence of the English Church from the Roman Curia because it did not give the Vatican a divorce ...
                    1. +1
                      5 February 2016 21: 29
                      Quote: grunt When William Wallace (Years of Life: 1270 - 1305 gg.) Fought with English women, they were also Catholics.

                      Yes, I know. And in 1560, Scotland also became Protestant. But, anyway, I respect the Scots more because I was beaten and because the whiskey is tasty. drinks
                      1. +1
                        5 February 2016 21: 52

                        If the Scots did not invent whiskey ... they would conquer the whole world drinks
                      2. +2
                        5 February 2016 22: 09
                        If the Scots did not invent whiskey ... they would conquer the whole world

                        Through chur, passionate were. Freemen. The world would not have been conquered, but it would certainly have been more interesting. Maybe they will once again make a referendum on separation? Last time I went broke, took the famous partridge. Did not help. laughing
                    2. +1
                      6 February 2016 03: 06
                      Quote: hrych
                      When William Wallace (Years of Life: 1270-1305) fought with English women,

                      What are you, the Scots are "robbers"! wink
            2. PN
              +9
              5 February 2016 15: 26
              Is our church impeccable? How many cases, for example, when drunk priests get into accidents while driving expensive cars. Look at the photo of how modestly the pope is dressed and how our patriarch is lined with gold! The Bible calls for humility and modesty, and the church at this time boasts of wealth. The higher the dignity, the steeper the jeep and the more luxurious the apartment. It should not be so.
              1. +4
                5 February 2016 15: 30
                Quote: PN Is our church impeccable? How many cases, for example, when drunk priests get into accidents while driving expensive cars. Look at the photo of how modestly the pope is dressed and how our patriarch is lined with gold!

                BEGAN!
                MIKHAN, where are you ?!
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +6
                  5 February 2016 15: 45
                  Well, denying the fact that many capital priests (meaning St. Petersburg and Moscow) in the region ruptured pointless. The farther from the centers, the purer and sincere faith in people.
                  1. +7
                    5 February 2016 21: 32
                    I am very sorry that you did not meet a real POP in Moscow. Believe me, there are a lot of them!

                    And about the meeting ... The theme of the meeting is humanitarian, it has nothing to do with dogma. A meeting of senior church officials.
                    1. -2
                      5 February 2016 23: 02
                      The thing is ... I know that they are. But people remember the bad much longer than the good. You get used to the good, but the bad constantly mazolit eyes.
                      There was one acquaintance ... In general, there was no money at that time to pay for the funeral of the church, too, so the local priest said, they say, the turn days in 5 we can hold. Let's go to another - the same garbage. As a result, they spat and came to the Catholics. To the church of St. Anthony the Miracle Worker. There, as I understand it, a beggarly order is located.
                      The essence of the fable is ... The farther the priests are from the authorities, the cleaner and better they are.
                      Here they constantly write on forums about which Catholics are rich, banks, etc.
                      Do you guys think that all the restoration of Orthodox cathedrals, churches and temples are done at the expense of the state or at the expense of taxes? Cars at priests - gifts of wealthy parishioners? I would like to tell you one funny thing from a friend who works in financial monitoring, so no one will believe.
                      Faith replaces some of them. This is not about a specific religion. If Catholics are Orthodox filthy heretics, Muslims are generally animals and should be killed. Orthodox - Catholics, filthy heretics, sleep and see how to multiply us by zero. The attitude towards Muslims is much better, but the aggressiveness remains. Muslims have the most disgusting radicalism, but here the politicians and special services of the world empire of goodness and rainbow unicorns "helped".
                      1. +2
                        5 February 2016 23: 20
                        Quote: Samurai3X Let's go to another - the same garbage. As a result, they spat and came to the Catholics. To the church of St. Anthony the Miracle Worker.

                        The deceased, what kind of faith was that? And, if it doesn’t matter who the funeral service is, then why do the funeral service at all. And, about the priest, who refused because of a lack of money, I won’t believe it. Be it even Moscow, or which city else. And the rest of the reasoning in the comment, about what?
                      2. -1
                        6 February 2016 11: 43
                        He was a Christian.
                        So the pop did not refuse. He said that there are a lot of people and by no means will come out before 5 days. Not without a difference, but the relatives were in such a shock that only later became angry.
                      3. 0
                        8 February 2016 09: 15
                        Quote: Samurai3X
                        In general, there was no money at that time to pay for the funeral even for the church, so the local priest said that they could spend a turn and days through 5.

                        Story
                3. +7
                  5 February 2016 16: 33
                  Quote: PN
                  Look at the photo of how modestly dressed dad

                  They are awfully poor! Like your eyes, only "poor" clothes are visible!
                  And in the know? what
                  The papal state, a dwarf state in size (0,44 square kilometers hidden behind the Vatican wall, in the western region of Rome, on the right bank of the Tiber, the population is about two thousand people, although Wikipedia gives 832 people), is titanium by international influence. The Vatican became an independent state on June 7, 1929, in accordance with the Lateran agreements concluded by Pope Pius XI with the Italian government, led by Benito Mussolini. The state has its own newspaper, radio and televisionown flag. True, there are no cops of their own. The Vatican also has its own army (Swiss guards), its own prison.
                  The Vatican has almost 1,5 billion Catholics under its rule. The Vatican's gigantic wealth consists of the investments of the banks of Rothschild, Britain and the USA.
                  Money laundering
                  The sole owner of the bank is the representative of St. Peter on Earth - Pope. Although the activities of the bank are very far from sacred affairs. This is a kind of pantry for the entire Roman Catholic Church. Countless dioceses, councils, church organizations and foundations have accounts here. But bank customers are not only different institutions. The accounts in this bank are used by the Italian mafia for money laundering. Corrupt German politicians also use the services of the Vatican Bank when they want to be sure that no tax or financial institution can get to their money. Thousands of super-rich Germans (and not only Germans) hide their millions in various financial institutions in certain countries, where they can be sure of their safety. After recent revelations, for example, in Switzerland or Liechtenstein, many themselves confessed to avoid prosecution for tax crimes in Germany. But these millionaires were either very cunning, or they did not have the necessary information. If someone wants to be absolutely sure that the tax inspectors will never bother him, he must entrust his not-so-pure millions to one very silent Roman lady ... And although in November last year the Vatican signed a money laundering agreement with the European Union, this the document should not bother capital owners of dubious origin - politicians, economists, and others. The contract deals only with minor cosmetic measures.

                  More information at http://voprosik.net/vatikan-kak-mezhdunarodnyj-oligarx/ © QUESTION
                  1. +4
                    5 February 2016 16: 36
                    A bank within a church state is legal in general. autonomous. Whatever the Vatican signs, important obligations with respect to the EU, in principle, it remains just an official paper, because everything that the Vatican Bank does is a completely different issue, and from a legal point of view, these are two fundamentally different things! Speeches by Pope Benedict XVI against money laundering are worthy of respect - he zealously informed the public about this. But the mafia, some politicians and other bank customers caress the rumor of the word that the Vatican Bank denies the presence of "dirty" money in its vaults. The Vatican Bank maintains accounts and funds that do not actually exist. The Bank provides them to politicians representing parties whose names contain the word "Christian." Among them, for example, are public figures who in Germany diligently denounce citizens who illegally shelter their savings abroad. Democracy in Germany has several "black holes" that ordinary citizens know nothing about. The Vatican Bank is one of them, and incredibly effective. Religiosity and morality in practice The Bank of the Vatican cannot be controlled or closed. Officially, it is a private and at the same time very devout institution. But it’s strange that the bank’s employees and customers have nothing to do with true Christian religiosity and morality, which is taught in the basics of theology. Very clearly and metaphorically simple bank activities can be described as follows. Imagine the richest billionaire in the world, who (hypothetically) has safes with their own billions hidden in different places. And none of them reports a billionaire. Traveling around the world, he transfers money from one safe to another without any control and any taxes, while his good friends can also hide his considerable accumulations from him, if necessary, again without any outside control. The Vatican Bank carefully and carefully selects those who will be offered a very profitable cooperation. They must not only entrust their millions or billions to the bank, they must also be very pious. In terms of The Vatican’s internal code of ethics, which is completely different from the external code, which the pope and his closest associates demand from their parishioners. And if the flocks abide by this code, she is promised eternal bliss in heaven. P / S. Once Pope Leo XIII decided to open Vatican archives for "scientists and people of different professions", but quickly changed his mind, leaving the famous saying to the heirs: "History is a huge complex of events and processes. Many would like to change it or see it in their own way. Therefore, discovering new things about the past is dangerous and even harmful." Apparently, proceeding from this logic, not a single Pope exposed and criticized (in secular language) any of his predecessors.

                    More information at http://voprosik.net/vatikan-kak-mezhdunarodnyj-oligarx/ © QUESTION
                  2. 0
                    5 February 2016 16: 38
                    Quote: avva2012
                    Look at the photo of how modestly dressed dad

                    Pravdarm Okst where, I wrote like that. You, however, imagined something.
                    1. +1
                      5 February 2016 16: 43
                      Guilty, corrected! This is PN. Accidentally!
                      1. +1
                        5 February 2016 16: 46
                        Thank you And then, about the modesty of the Pope, this is a bust.
                      2. 0
                        5 February 2016 16: 54
                        In what sense is "overkill"? What is it?
                      3. +1
                        5 February 2016 17: 06
                        In what sense is "overkill"? What is it?

                        Yes, you have described everything perfectly. Plus the Order of the Jesuits, that intelligence, the KGB would be envious. And not only them.
                      4. +1
                        5 February 2016 17: 11
                        Oh, got it! Something I personally accepted, but you are not talking about me! hi
                        By the way
                        At the end of the branch it is not clear what is happening.
                        Indeed, for the first time I see this! The machinations of the Vatican antichrist. (And not only belay )
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. +3
                  5 February 2016 15: 54
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich oh in vain you hinted about the Russian Orthodox Church on this site, the rules are strict, you can’t hurt the feelings of believers, you can only atheists and agnostics spread rot. 21 century, adults ...

                  Yes, okay, you, Andrey Yuryevich. Believe what you want or don't believe at all. If only the person was good. I just don't like some believers. Those who are "blessings of the Church", etc., that's where the stinking ulcer is.
                  1. +4
                    5 February 2016 15: 58
                    Quote: avva2012
                    Yes, okay, you, Andrey Yuryevich. Believe in what you want or not believe at all. If only the person was good.

                    say the truth! drinks
                2. 0
                  5 February 2016 16: 05
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich By the way, I can deceive that this note will disappear very soon, as soon as people begin to express their attitude to the church, the article is immediately deleted.

                  Ah, the mess has already begun. At the end of the branch it is not clear what is happening.
                3. +2
                  5 February 2016 16: 21
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  atheists yes agnostics spread rot

                  But who spread rot you?
                4. PN
                  +2
                  5 February 2016 16: 34
                  Feelings of believers and no one hurts. And think deeper, what does a person believe in God or the ROC? I think the answer is obvious, despite the fact that the Russian Orthodox Church positions itself as a conductor between man and God. ;-)
                  1. +4
                    5 February 2016 22: 32
                    Feelings of believers and no one hurts. And think deeper, what does a person believe in God or the ROC? I think the answer is obvious, despite the fact that the Russian Orthodox Church positions itself as a conductor between man and God.


                    The Russian Orthodox Church has never positioned itself as an intermediary. Priests are servants of God. You can go to the Temple, you can not go - they will still serve. Simply, when you do not go to the Temple, you deprive yourself of the opportunity to participate in the sacraments of the Church. It is important for you or not to decide for yourself.
                5. +5
                  5 February 2016 22: 02
                  but to me as a servant of the devil another penalty point will fly!


                  In vain you flaunt. How not to regret it. There were, you know, precedents. I wish you to avoid this. hi
              3. +2
                5 February 2016 16: 38
                Quote: PN
                how modestly the pope is dressed and how our patriarch is lined with gold!

                The pope has his own state, albeit a dwarf one - he is so good.
              4. +1
                5 February 2016 16: 42
                Quote: PN
                It should not be so.

                Everyone should live in TV boxes and wear chains. smile
              5. +1
                5 February 2016 19: 57
                Is our church impeccable? How many cases, for example, when drunk priests get into accidents while driving expensive cars. Look at the photo of how modestly the pope is dressed and how our patriarch is lined with gold! The Bible calls for humility and modesty, and the church at this time boasts of wealth. The higher the dignity, the steeper the jeep and the more luxurious the apartment. Shouldn't be like that

                So the patriarch has already spoken on this subject:

                0
                Constant talk about the excess wealth of the Russian Orthodox Church, priests and their cars lead a person away from faith, salvation and the “cross of the Lord,” said Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Kirill at the consecration ceremony of the new Moscow church. The words of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church on Sunday, RIA Novosti.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. +5
              5 February 2016 16: 01
              I don’t remember watching the film — a boy came to church and tells the priest I did poorly; as a result, a man died.

              You still try to study the life of the church on cartoons
            5. 0
              5 February 2016 21: 09
              Do you think that in other religions the clergy are much better? Do not be naive or a fanatic.
          2. Arh
            +1
            5 February 2016 15: 13
            Well, friendship and understanding of churches are healthy !!!
            1. +2
              5 February 2016 15: 47
              Quote: Arh
              That's because is healthy friendship and understanding of churches !!!
              Yes, not healthy ... (a doctor friend said)
              1. Arh
                0
                5 February 2016 20: 39
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                Quote: Arh
                That's because is healthy friendship and understanding of churches !!!
                Yes, not healthy ... (a doctor friend said)


                Clearly healthy it is healthy, but not healthy at the floor and without a doctor it is clear)))))) laughing laughing laughing
        2. +3
          5 February 2016 16: 18
          This is not a difficult topic. This topic is not at all from our site !! And here Military Review and the meeting of two church leaders
        3. +1
          6 February 2016 19: 14
          Quote: alex-s
          Sophisticated is the topic!

          If only not in Slytherin. Only not in Slytherin.
          laughing
          1. SSR
            0
            6 February 2016 19: 26
            Quote: Remy_Argo
            Quote: alex-s
            Sophisticated is the topic!

            If only not in Slytherin. Only not in Slytherin.
            laughing

            ha ha ha! He laughed))) Thank you. )))
      2. +7
        5 February 2016 15: 05
        For that matter, this is a catalytic US balamutite BV.

        US elites are not Catholic, but Protestant. They are also called WASP - white anglo-saxon protestants. Catholics in the United States are immigrants from Latin America, as well as descendants of immigrants from Ireland, Italy and Poland.
        1. +3
          5 February 2016 15: 14
          Quote: Lanista US elites are not Catholic, but Protestant. They are also called WASP - white anglo-saxon protestants.
          Now, this is evil !. And, in fact, they are idolaters. Their God is Mammon!
      3. +5
        5 February 2016 15: 23
        The United States is not Catholic, but Protestant and Jewish.
        1. +3
          5 February 2016 15: 28
          Quote: Uncle Vasya Sayapin The United States is not Catholic, but Protestant and Jewish.

          The Irish are Catholics, and they are present in the elite. If not mistaken, the Kennedy clan as well. But, if we talk about the Americans, then formal worship no longer matters. Although, not the most ugly president was one of them.
          1. +2
            5 February 2016 15: 49
            Quote: avva2012
            Although, not the most ugly president was one of them.
            The Fed would not have touched, would have lived longer ...
        2. -1
          5 February 2016 15: 33
          Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin
          The United States is not Catholic, but Protestant and Jewish.

          The United States believes in disbelief in the form of God. As the Roman legionnaire, capturing Jerusalem, exclaimed - is this your god? There is nothing
      4. +3
        5 February 2016 15: 39
        So in the USA, it’s mostly Baptists and other sects :-)
        1. +3
          5 February 2016 15: 50
          Quote: 2s1122
          So in the USA, it’s mostly Baptists and other sects :-)

          like Mavrodi ... and yes, solid sectarians ...
      5. +2
        5 February 2016 15: 42
        USA??? Catholic ??? We don’t study history at all?
      6. +1
        5 February 2016 15: 49
        Quote: Engineer
        For that matter, this is a catalytic US balamutite BV.

        Protestant USA hi
      7. +3
        5 February 2016 17: 05
        For that matter, this is a catalytic US balamutite BV ....................................... .......................................
        .................... the United States is more Protestant, no one in the world has destroyed as many people as Protestants! Catholics are just angels in the flesh compared to Protestants!
      8. +1
        5 February 2016 17: 46
        Quote: Engineer
        What does radical Islam have to do with it? It is a sign for the whole world and a weapon of agitation for brainless fighters. For that matter, this is a catalytic US balamutite BV. So why is it such a union then with the Catholics? There are no religious wars, all are much more pragmatic.


        The main religion in the USA is Protestants. There are Catholics, but not very many. There is such a definition of the governing and steering country of the American - BAP (white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant).
      9. 0
        5 February 2016 18: 42
        The United States has never been Catholic, most Christians in the states are Protestants. Catholics are South America. But there is radical Islam; one does not have to pretend that it is not. Take even Saudi Arabia - there is nowhere more radical.
        1. 0
          5 February 2016 18: 56
          Quote: Maksus most Christians in the states are Protestants.
          But there is radical Islam; one does not have to pretend that it does not exist.

          Yes, what are they, Christians. Protestantism unites, precisely with radical Islam, the fact that they pay attention to the external side of religion. Some are sure that since there were no cowards under the prophet, that means you can also cut your head for that. Others are sure that since you are rich, then God loves you. Of course, if not, then alas. By and large, that those others are atheists. They do not understand that the deepest meaning of faith, however, is different.
      10. 0
        5 February 2016 22: 33
        Cuban priests are cool. The pope is weeping for not being taken.
    2. +3
      5 February 2016 15: 04
      They decided to hold a meeting on a neutral territory, amusing ... so that there were no squeaks from the EU or the United States. what

      And in the meantime ... in Moscow ... they made a decision. And perhaps fateful for the whole BV.
      Representation of Syrian Kurdistan to open in Moscow
      1. +2
        5 February 2016 15: 18
        I am sure that the howling and humiliation of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian Orthodox will begin again? You can start the devils already!
        1. +3
          5 February 2016 15: 22
          Quote MIHAN I am sure that the howling and humiliation of the Russian Orthodox Church will begin again? You can start the devils already!

          MIKHAN, well, where the hell on the VO site? If, only in a binge.
          1. +1
            5 February 2016 15: 51
            Quote: avva2012

            MIKHAN, well, where the hell on the VO site? If, only in a binge.

            I don’t know how, but Meehan has their own. laughing
          2. +2
            5 February 2016 16: 42
            Quote: avva2012
            Quote MIHAN I am sure that the howling and humiliation of the Russian Orthodox Church will begin again? You can start the devils already!

            MIKHAN, well, where the hell on the VO site? If, only in a binge.

            Read further comments .... and see everything! (your joke is stupid and inappropriate)
            1. +1
              5 February 2016 16: 52
              Quote MIHAN Read further comments .... and see everything! (your joke is stupid and inappropriate)

              As one person said, "all the stupidest things have always been done with serious faces" (or something like that). And, people, in the majority, simply do not believe. What, pour them holy water for that? Where is your Christian tolerance? Ah, those who out of spite writes or for money, those also do not belong to hell. They are miserable.
              1. +2
                5 February 2016 17: 01
                Quote: avva2012
                Quote MIHAN Read further comments .... and see everything! (your joke is stupid and inappropriate)

                As one person said, "all the stupidest things have always been done with serious faces" (or something like that). And, people, in the majority, simply do not believe. What, pour them holy water for that? Where is your Christian tolerance? Ah, those who out of spite writes or for money, those also do not belong to hell. They are miserable.

                Yes, you went ... Damn golem! You start to get bastard bastard .. well, well
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +2
                    5 February 2016 17: 13
                    Quote: avva2012
                    MIKHAN I twist myself, can it help?

                    You have it clearly twisted ... dude! Stop sniffing coke .. bastard!
                    1. +1
                      5 February 2016 17: 32
                      MIKHAN, the transition to personal insults without argument is a sign of a narrow-minded person. You also consider yourself a patriot.
                      1. +2
                        5 February 2016 17: 53
                        Quote: razgildyay
                        MIKHAN, the transition to personal insults without argument is a sign of a narrow-minded person. You also consider yourself a patriot.

                        You again ? May I manage without yours, please? Well, I don’t want to be rude, honestly! How did you all get me .... angry
        2. -5
          5 February 2016 16: 54
          howl and humiliation of the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian Orthodox

          So do not let yourself be offended, because you see, they are being hurt on the forum. For example, Daul’s unloved one - whatever one may say, but in Islamic worship a lot of people openly support him. Yes, yes, and in Chechnya too.
          So build your Orthodox State of Russia and the CIS and nobody will offend you.
          1. +3
            5 February 2016 20: 53
            Quote: razgildyay
            howl and humiliation of the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian Orthodox

            So do not let yourself be offended, because you see, they are being hurt on the forum. For example, Daul’s unloved one - whatever one may say, but in Islamic worship a lot of people openly support him. Yes, yes, and in Chechnya too.
            So build your Orthodox State of Russia and the CIS and nobody will offend you.

            in short ... the liberalist is over!
            Shoot nafig! I read such mudazvonov .. bully And more than once!
    3. -4
      5 February 2016 15: 40
      Only the Popes are baptized to God, and they pray the devil. It always has been.
    4. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        5 February 2016 16: 40
        MEMORANDUM FOR THE CREATION OF “A NEW WORLD RELIGION” SIGNED IN STRASBOURG BETWEEN GLOBAL JUDO-SATANISTS AND TRADITORS OF ORTHODOXY FROM GREECE, RUSSIA, etc.
        http://ajbolit444.livejournal.com/1341558.html?thread=6682486
        on the part of the Russian Orthodox Church, the document was signed by Archbishop Hilarion ...

        On the "Censor" gave a link?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +7
            5 February 2016 17: 48
            Quote: Sveles One goal - to destroy the Orthodox Church, to turn people into cattle.

            Destroy the Orthodox Church, only we can. If we turn into cattle. With God's help, I think this will not happen. And so, it is more like conspiracy thesis.
          2. +1
            5 February 2016 19: 53
            Quote: Sveles

            http://communitarian.ru/publikacii/tserkovnaya_analitika/memorandum_o_sozdanii_n

            ovoy_mirovoy_religii_podpisannyy_v_strasburge_mezhdu_globalnymi_iudo-satanistami

            _i_predatelyami_pravoslaviya_iz_grecii_08112015 /

            Anyway, you drive.
      2. +1
        5 February 2016 17: 30
        Quote: Sveles
        MEMORANDUM FOR THE CREATION OF “A NEW WORLD RELIGION” SIGNED IN STRASBOURG BETWEEN GLOBAL JUDO-SATANISTS

        I recommend that you call the Judeo-Satanists Department and talk about it, call 8 (495) 637-21-20, from 9-30 to 16-30 (Moscow time) on business days.
      3. -2
        5 February 2016 17: 50
        Of course, I am not a big specialist for rabbis, but the man on the right is more like a Catholic priest than a rabbi. And you can’t confuse our priest with anyone :)
      4. +1
        5 February 2016 19: 52
        Quote: Sveles
        ATTENTION !!! IMPORTANT !!! CHANGE !!!

        You drive.
    5. -1
      5 February 2016 21: 10
      Ecumenism is coming. We are waiting for sodomite priests, same-sex marriages and other "fun" in Russia.
  2. +5
    5 February 2016 15: 02
    Yes, we live in an interesting time. It certainly hasn’t happened yet.
  3. +6
    5 February 2016 15: 08
    It is high time to move away from the Middle Ages in relations between Orthodox and Catholics. The difference is distinguished only by theologians. And ISIS is not the worst. There it is clear, bearded, they are not ours. Yes, and with knives. The so-called liberal values ​​of the West, its nihilism, unbelief are much worse. These are dressed in white clothes, talking about freedom. The freedom to be a pervert, the freedom to hate your parents, the country. IMHO. There is only one freedom - the freedom of conscience, i.e., Faith. May God bless the heads of Christianity!
    1. +1
      5 February 2016 15: 27
      The difference is that they are different organizations with their own goals. This is all politics. But I personally like Catholics more than Protestants.
      1. +1
        5 February 2016 15: 32
        Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin But I personally like Catholics more than Protestants.

        I agree. And, most importantly, both Orthodox and Catholics agree on this issue (about Protestants). Schismatics are for them.
        1. +1
          5 February 2016 18: 57
          Quote: avva2012
          Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin But I personally like Catholics more than Protestants.

          I agree. And, most importantly, both Orthodox and Catholics agree on this issue (about Protestants). Schismatics are for them.

          You should at least read something on the topic before writing such nonsense. I mean, they read something more or less serious. And not some kind of agitation. After the split of the Church into Eastern (Orthodox) and Western (Roman Catholic), both churches cursed each other (officially the anathema was lifted only in 1965). And the relationship all this time was appropriate, right up to the massacres. In the 16th century, the Reformation took place in the Roman Church. Some priests opposed the departure from the Bible and the abuse of the clergy. As a result, two new branches of Christianity appeared: Lutherans and Reformats (they are also Presbyterians, they are Huguenots - the name depended on the country) - in general, these are classical Protestants (later many branches appeared). So these new churches were much closer to Orthodoxy than Catholics. It is interesting that the Pope cursed Protestants (in the middle of the 20th century the anathema was lifted, and the Pope recently repented for persecution), BUT the Orthodox Church never protested. It got to the point that during the time of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, when Catholics terrorized all dissidents in the territory of present-day western and central Ukraine, priests of the Orthodox and Reformed churches concluded an informal alliance to assert their rights.
          In the Orthodox Church there is a clear division of Christians into Orthodox and Orthodox. Non-Orthodox are Catholics and Protestants: Lutherans, Reforms, Presbyterians, Anglicans and it seems the Baptists (not sure). Sects that are not considered Christians at all are identified separately. Moreover, by the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in 1858, the rite of conversion of the heterodox to Orthodoxy was determined. So, if a priest from these Protestant churches converted to Orthodoxy, he would still remain a priest !!!
          Problems in relations between the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (other Orthodox patriarchs have no such problems) and Protestants, appeared only in recent history. This happened during the Soviet era when the Russian Orthodox Church actually agreed to serve the interests of the atheist government and most Protestants refused. Although at the official international level, the Russian Orthodox Church contacted Protestants in the World Council of Churches.
          Bottom line: the gap between the RCC and Orthodoxy is much larger than between the Orthodox and Protestants. Further, Protestants were never schismatic for Orthodoxy, but Catholics for Orthodoxy were schismatic until 1965. And for Catholics, for almost 50 years, Protestants are not schismatic. Moreover, due to the fact that the RCC - has a single world center (Rome), and the Protestants are quite divided, politically the RCC is a much more dangerous organization, which they have demonstrated over the past 1000 years.
          1. 0
            5 February 2016 19: 58
            Quote: Normal ok This happened during the Soviet era when the Russian Orthodox Church actually agreed to serve the interests of the atheist government and most Protestants refused. Although at the official international level, the Russian Orthodox Church contacted Protestants in the World Council of Churches.

            Well, firstly, it’s not clear, but what immediately is nonsense? Come with good arguments. Secondly, thirdly, etc.
            The Church has always "served" the authorities. Do you think the Protestants were in opposition to Henry the 8th? At the expense of Soviet power, read what the hierarchs wrote in "modern history", Why and for what, they recognized the power of the Soviets. I, I think, were not interested, because of the ideological rejection of everything Soviet? In my opinion, you can find (pull out of context) any evidence that you are right. Therefore, I will not approach much from the other side. And what the Protestants don't have? Protestants have no apostolic succession, no saints, no fasting, no confession, repentance, and no sacrament, no icons and spiritual art, no monasticism and monasteries. Maybe, to whom it seems, this is all superfluous, I don’t. As for the schismatics of the Protestants, they are unambiguously considered those of the Protestants who do not accept the icon. And, another point that does not apply directly to religion. The political struggle of East and West, it is also a struggle of churches. It was more fierce with the Catholics. Hence the hatred and distrust. If we take the essence of the doctrine itself, then the difference between the Orthodox and Catholics is still less than with the Protestants.
    2. 0
      5 February 2016 15: 52
      Quote: avva2012
      It is high time to move away from the Middle Ages in relations between Orthodox and Catholics.

      maybe just move away?
      1. +3
        5 February 2016 15: 58
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich maybe just move away?

        Can believers decide for themselves?
        1. -1
          5 February 2016 16: 00
          Quote: avva2012
          Can believers decide for themselves?

          God knows ... maybe they decide ... request
          1. 0
            5 February 2016 16: 09
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich God knows ... maybe they decide ...

            THIS is not that believer. Or rather not there. Or not from there. In short, he only "believes and trembles." Therefore, he cannot know.
            Ah, I personally hope so.
    3. +2
      5 February 2016 16: 12
      "Only theologians can tell the difference." Fear God! We are so different that white and black are one color compared to us. All that is good for us is death. Not to be confused with our local Catholics! The bearded and I are closer, we ourselves were like that before Nikon's reform, "true Christians."
      1. -3
        5 February 2016 16: 31
        "Quote: NyeMoNik70 Only theologians can tell the difference. "Fear God!

        For Catholics, the Symbol of Faith was changed (In Catholicism, the Holy Spirit emanates from God the Father and from God the Son, in Orthodoxy only from God the Father). And it's all!
        Everything else, that is, celibacy, "the Pope, God's vicar on earth", the age of communion, and from the heels of other differences, is not essential! The rest is politics.
  4. +5
    5 February 2016 15: 11
    The topic is complicated. No questions. There is an understanding that the Vatican has been trying for centuries to get rid of Orthodoxy by all available methods. It would be nice if Patriarch Kirill asked Pope Francis - where and why, during the time of Peter the Great, the Vatican emissaries took carts and books of the times from monasteries by convoys and destroyed them? And what has changed since then?
    1. +1
      5 February 2016 22: 19
      Can I link to fierce nonsense about the convoys of emissaries of the Vatican, exporting property from Orthodox monasteries with the consent of Peter the Great? Fomenko miscalculated or even some sort of charlatan? laughing
      1. 0
        8 February 2016 09: 21
        Quote: Pissarro
        Fomenko miscalculated or even some sort of charlatan?

        That is, the Uniates in Ukraine did not do anything .... Yeah.
        1. 0
          10 February 2016 18: 51
          what does the Ukrainian Uniates have to do with Peter the Great? The lands inhabited by the Uniates to the empire annexed Catherine and the Uniates returned to Orthodoxy on these lands. They remained only in Austrian Galicia, Stalin dispersed them there. They crawled out again after perestroika
          1. 0
            11 February 2016 09: 44
            Quote: Pissarro
            The lands inhabited by Uniates to the empire were joined by Catherine

            That is, before that, they lived soul to soul with the ROC?
  5. +2
    5 February 2016 15: 12
    It’s interesting of course, but I don’t think it can lead to anything concrete ... too long and strong contradictions, I generally have little idea what they can discuss
    1. +1
      5 February 2016 15: 32
      Quote: pavlentiy
      too long and strong contradictions

      It is true that they cannot even agree with the ROCC and DOC, but even more so with the Catholics.
  6. +8
    5 February 2016 15: 13
    The title is not entirely incorrect. The head of the Orthodox Church is Jesus Christ. Patriarch Kirill - Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church.
    But the news is very unexpected and important.
  7. +4
    5 February 2016 15: 13
    Why the Pope wears a tiara and Why the Patriarch of All Russia wears a warrior helmet covered in brocade. The patriarch protects. These are not my words, but my friend after talking with Alexy II. May God agree. Obama's godless mess fed up
  8. +4
    5 February 2016 15: 15
    Following the meeting, it is expected that a joint declaration will be signed on the issues mentioned.
    It means that the preparations have already begun quite a while. Of course, you need to meet and talk "eye to eye". Patriarch Kirill knows better.
  9. 0
    5 February 2016 15: 25
    Quote: alex-s
    Sophisticated is the topic!

    That's right. Cubans themselves are mostly Catholics, but there are other religions there. Although the church itself is separated from the state. Well, they will travel to warm places, discuss and disperse. Unfortunately {and maybe better} now religious leaders do not influence state policy.
    Well, in general, take a break from their homes stop x places
  10. +5
    5 February 2016 15: 29
    Honestly, as a Russian Orthodox person, this visit causes some caution. Some sixth sense suggests that all this is no accident.
  11. +1
    5 February 2016 15: 34
    Quote: avva2012
    It is high time to move away from the Middle Ages in relations between Orthodox and Catholics. The difference is distinguished only by theologians. And ISIS is not the worst. There it is clear, bearded, they are not ours. Yes, and with knives. The so-called liberal values ​​of the West, its nihilism, unbelief are much worse. These are dressed in white clothes, talking about freedom. The freedom to be a pervert, the freedom to hate your parents, the country. IMHO. There is only one freedom - the freedom of conscience, i.e., Faith. May God bless the heads of Christianity!


    Read the Apocalypse. It says all Churches will unite to worship the Antichrist.
    1. +3
      5 February 2016 15: 38
      [Quote] Quote: Winter Cherry Read the Apocalypse. It says all the churches will unite to worship the Antichrist.

      Worship who bothers you. Wow, from the whole Gospel, the first thing that came to your mind? But, while I grieve you, they just meet, do not agree, but meet! For the first time, during the entire existence of Christianity after the separation!
  • 0
    5 February 2016 15: 39
    Quote: Winter Cherry
    Read the Apocalypse. It says all Churches will unite to worship the Antichrist

    Read Leo Taxil to have such predictions with humor
    1. +1
      5 February 2016 15: 45
      Read in the 80s "Funny Bible", "Funny Gospel". Only I don't find anything funny there, however, Charles Hebdo smokes on the sidelines - blasphemy is off the charts.
  • +2
    5 February 2016 15: 35
    The flock from Latin America, which supports Russia's policy regarding the United States, has a great influence on the pope.
  • 0
    5 February 2016 15: 41
    God is one in all faiths, and all have one path to Paradise through goodness, but thanks to the apostates, everything has changed upside down.
    1. -1
      5 February 2016 16: 13
      You are mistaken, the Orthodox holy fathers said that the path to Paradise lies through the recognition of one's own sins and repentance, moreover, sincere.
      1. -1
        5 February 2016 16: 17
        Quote: Winter cherry
        through the confession of one's own sins and repentance, and sincerely.

        AND AWARE!
  • +1
    5 February 2016 15: 42
    Quote: avva2012
    quote] Quote: Winter cherry Read the Apocalypse. It says all the churches will unite to worship the Antichrist.

    Worship who bothers you. Wow, from the whole Gospel, the first thing that came to your mind? But, while I grieve you, they just meet, do not agree, but meet! For the first time, during the entire existence of Christianity after the separation!

    I’m just against unification and especially worship. But you can’t throw words out of the Holy Scripture.
    1. 0
      5 February 2016 15: 47
      So, after all, a great event will actually happen! For the first time! Sorry for the harshness. From emotions. And what is in Cuba is symbolic. "Liberty Island!".
  • +1
    5 February 2016 15: 45
    As you know, these two figures serve the same forces -
  • -1
    5 February 2016 15: 53
    The main beginning of the dialogue is already a good deed for all Orthodox and Catholics.
    1. +1
      5 February 2016 16: 09
      No, not good. The Catholic Church has always claimed universal authority and supremacy. And if something happens, then not unification, but the accession of the Orthodox Church to the Satanic Catholic. Only on these conditions will the Catholic Church meet the Orthodox. Do you need it? I don’t.
      1. 0
        5 February 2016 16: 15
        do not confuse politics with contradictions within the church. The discord between the churches occurred, precisely because of politics, that is, the secular principle. Currently, there are no irreconcilable positions. The fact that there will be a reunion, the conversation will go so five hundred years later (if there is anyone). And, here is the coordination of actions in the fight against spirituality, is possible right now.
      2. 0
        5 February 2016 16: 15
        At least I am against it!
      3. 0
        5 February 2016 17: 53
        Quote: Winter Cherry
        No, not good. The Catholic Church has always claimed universal authority and supremacy. And if something happens, then not unification, but the accession of the Orthodox Church to the Satanic Catholic. Only on these conditions will the Catholic Church meet the Orthodox. Do you need it? I don’t.

        I completely agree! And with the conclusions of this Man, too! - http://kalmius-info.ru/avtori/anton-blagin/56289.html
  • 0
    5 February 2016 15: 54
    Extremely interesting news. Maybe I'm wrong, but it looks like a reformation of the Christian religion is coming. It is difficult to imagine another reason for a PERSONAL MEETING. Everything else is decided by conventional channels.
    Obi systems have existed for over two thousand years. The question is what has really changed? The Aquarian Age? Everything is not as simple as it seems. But the event is definitely epoch-making. Indeed, "when I enter the city, a man with a jug of water will meet me."
  • 0
    5 February 2016 16: 05
    Would not fight. wassat
  • 0
    5 February 2016 16: 15
    I would like to combine the dates of the celebration of the great Christian holidays and the Orthodox and Catholics with the Lutherans to celebrate in the same days.
  • -1
    5 February 2016 16: 18
    Dad, seeing Cyril, is freaking out about what a rogue he is (Dad))))) You can see even the "trick" in the photo.
  • 0
    5 February 2016 16: 21
    Quote: Engineer
    What does radical Islam have to do with it? It is a sign for the whole world and a weapon of agitation for brainless fighters. For that matter, this is a catalytic US balamutite BV. So why is it such a union then with the Catholics? There are no religious wars, all are much more pragmatic.

    The United States is predominantly a Protestant country, about 24% of Catholics there.
  • 0
    5 February 2016 16: 43
    Looked at the pictures. If they are made after the meeting, then we won or what?
  • +1
    5 February 2016 16: 44
    Quote: PN
    Is our church impeccable? How many cases, for example, when drunk priests get into accidents while driving expensive cars. Look at the photo of how modestly the pope is dressed and how our patriarch is lined with gold! The Bible calls for humility and modesty, and the church at this time boasts of wealth. The higher the dignity, the steeper the jeep and the more luxurious the apartment. It should not be so.

    Have you seen the good? Or do we see only the bad things in Orthodoxy?
  • 0
    5 February 2016 20: 37
    The procedure of ecumenism will be discussed. Cyril is an ardent supporter of the unification of the ecumenical and orthodox churches.
    1. 0
      6 February 2016 02: 46
      Quote: vignat21
      Cyril is an ardent supporter of the unification of the ecumenical and orthodox churches

      Why do you think so.
  • 0
    5 February 2016 21: 27
    Andrei Ilyich Fursov seems to have warned of something like this (I apologize if I did not understand his words correctly or distorted them). He said that it was important for us to preserve our Orthodoxy, and not to catholicize it due to world trends, so that we would not spiritually fall under the power of the Vatican.
  • +2
    5 February 2016 21: 42
    Quote: Pravdarm
    Quote: AGAIN
    The necessary unification amid the development of radical Islam.

    Unnecessary union!
    With gay marriage promoters!
    Crowds of Catholic priests, pedophiles (and this is only official!)
    In their opinion, God can be bought off!
    He sinned, confessed, "received the Holy Communion" and more!
    I don’t remember watching the film — a boy came to church and tells the priest I did poorly; as a result, a man died. Do you know how the priest answered?
    - Read the prayer of the Virgin Mary for the night 15 times and you will be forgiven! SO SIMPLE!!!!

    They are sitting in a church, as if a favor to GOD!

    NO! NO! And again NO !!! perverts perverted the church, FAITH !!!

    If Orthodoxy is soiled, then there will be no good communication with Islam !!!

    A fanatic is not a believer.
    And what you are doing here is just the classic incitement of inter-religious hatred.
  • +2
    5 February 2016 23: 56
    MDA - SOMETHING WILL BE! ALL SUCH FIRST FOR 1000 YEARS !!!!!
  • "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"