Military Review

Kherson region. New Tatar autonomy as a scimitar for the Crimea?

44
Most recently, we wrote that because of the blockade of the Crimea, residents of the Kherson region suffer no less. Moreover, in the matter of supplying gas for heating residential buildings, Russia even had to remember about charity. Gas set for free.


Kherson region. New Tatar autonomy as a scimitar for the Crimea?


The campaign to highlight this action has stirred the media for some time. But then quietly faded out. As the campaign of the Crimean Tatars on the organization of the blockade of the peninsula. Today, only in some editions they recall this loud epic.

However, our calm today threatens the emergence of a completely new danger. It is the danger. On the border with the Crimea, a new Crimean Tatar autonomy arises. Without much adverting this, the Majlis is carrying out very serious work on the Islamization of the Kherson region.

For almost half a year, reports have been received from Kherson region about various cases of the arbitrariness of the Crimean Tatars. Squeeze cars. Evict residents from their own homes. Rob the locals. Cattle are stolen.

Almost a full set of gang raids. In this case, the local government looks at everything in silence. Moreover, the chiefs declare no crimes.

At the very beginning of the blockade of the Crimean Tatars actively supported the radicals of the Right Sector. It was they who formed the power component of the blockers. However, after the "pravosekov" Kiev authorities began to press, the friendship ended. "Majlis" was left without support.

And here, we must pay tribute to the active work of the leaders of the Mejlis, there was money. Appeared immediately from two sources, at least. Ukrainian authorities and Turkey. Poroshenko and Erdogan began direct funding of the Crimean Tatars in the Kherson region.

And with the advent of the opportunity to earn, fighters of famous battalions "Azov" and "Aydar" arrived there. We came to "help" to maintain constitutional order. Methods of such assistance punitive worked in the area of ​​ATO. And they are not going to change them.

This is a brief история the emergence of the main acting forces in this situation.

Many analysts from those who are interested in this issue, mistakenly believe that in the Kherson region after our charity events, pro-Russian sentiments are strong. Alas, it is not. There are few supporters of Russia among the locals. Rather, we can talk about antikievskim sentiments. Opponents Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk here really enough.

Why today should look at this region? Today, in fact, the Kherson region has become so far a virtual autonomy of the Tatars. Moreover, in conversations with the Crimean Tatars, references to historical documents began to flash more and more often. It was from there that the conversations about the historical borders of the Crimean Khanate began.

Indeed, we have learned to talk about historical boundaries. Crimean Khanate really "had access to the field." Crimea was only part of the Khanate. And that did not completely belong to the Tatars. So, the Kherson region can really be proclaimed the territory of the Crimean Tatars with the appropriate stretch.

But back today. What are the Crimean Tatars doing in the border areas? And they make a clear and well-known thing. Sly they populate the territory with their own people and crush the local authorities. Here is what one of the leaders of the “Majlis” Refat Chubarov writes.

“Under these conditions, when the Ukrainian government cannot control the Crimea and allocated some money for the arrangement of the Crimean Tatars, we are talking about 60 million UAH, we are trying to help this region as much as possible. It is not about financing the Majlis, but about financing the program of arrangement of the Crimean Tatars, about helping the media of the Crimean Tatars, including the ATR. We, of course, are trying to help this region as much as possible now. The same is our diaspora planning in the construction of mosques and other social projects. This year she will be implementing some projects in the region, including assistance to kindergartens. This assistance will be directed not only to the Crimean Tatars, but will objectively cover people of other nationalities. ”

The very process of resettlement of the Tatars in the Kherson region has accelerated. Not only citizens of Ukraine have already arrived here, but also a fairly large group of former citizens of other countries. In particular, Turkey. And these people, in some part, have experience of participation in radical organizations like the Gray Wolves. Moreover, they have combat experience of the Syrian war.

What is it done for? The answer lies in the policy of Kiev in relation to the Crimea. Divide and rule. Poroshenko and the company seeks to destroy the monolithic population. Thus, to deprive the opportunity to actively confront Kiev, as it happened in the Donbas.

The next question is quite reasonable - why spend the money the Turks? After all, no one hides that many objects are built by the Turks with their own money. And these are, first of all, religious and cultural centers, schools. What for?

The answer to this question, I think, lies in the assumption of further events in Ukraine. The unitary model of the state is falling apart. To save the existing system is already unrealistic. The next step is next. More precisely, the options steps.

The first option is federalization. When implementing this option, especially given the weakness of Kiev, the local regional elites get a lot of power. And this, in conjunction with financial supplies from Turkey, will automatically make the region almost independent of the central government. Thus, Turkey receives a territory that is very close to the Russian Crimea and becomes a sort of “yatagan” at its heart.

It will be even easier with the implementation of the second plan - the confederation. In this case, even nominally, the territory can be subordinated to Ankara. And then - according to the scheme described earlier.

On the agenda today is the issue of confronting the creation of a new Crimean Tatar autonomy. It is the confrontation. If we close our eyes to the facts today, then tomorrow we will receive quite tangible dangers.

Hope for Kiev and the Ukrainian government is not worth it. It cannot control the process. Even the millions that are allocated to the Majlis seem to be more paid off than the means to fight. Poroshenko yulit, but he has very few options. Either leave everything to chance, or to bargain for some benefits for themselves.
Author:
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. izya top
    izya top 5 February 2016 06: 13
    11
    in the framework of debilism on the ruin, I propose to rename Kherson to Dzhamilevka or Chubarov
    1. brasist
      brasist 5 February 2016 10: 55
      0
      Then completely ... the dream will disappear.
      1. Megatron
        Megatron 5 February 2016 20: 29
        0
        But what about terbat Kherson?
        It seems that he already protected the locals from the Tatars and from the Aidar


        It was necessary to immediately take away all the areas, right up to Transnistria, so no, they blinked.
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 5 February 2016 11: 55
      0
      Quote: izya top
      rename Kherson to Dzhamilevka or Chebarovka

      in "-to-nose" ...
  2. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 5 February 2016 06: 20
    +2
    There are not many supporters of Russia among local residents.
    So this is a well-known fact about the inhabitants there, frostbite ears to spite Putin!
    1. Aleksander
      Aleksander 5 February 2016 09: 29
      +5
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      There are not many supporters of Russia among local residents.
      So this is a well-known fact about the inhabitants there, frostbite ears to spite Putin!


      There are 165 thousand Russians, people are just afraid. Tatars + Turks = 10 thousand (1%), but behind them are organization, power and money.
    2. Mik13
      Mik13 5 February 2016 09: 42
      -4
      Many analysts from those who are interested in this issue, mistakenly believe that in the Kherson region after our charity events, pro-Russian sentiments are strong. Alas, it is not. There are few supporters of Russia among the locals. Rather, we can talk about antikievskim sentiments. Opponents Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk here really enough.

      I would like to see some justification for this statement.
      Maybe someone conducted a sociological study, maybe the author discovered a new sociological methodology.
      1. user
        user 5 February 2016 10: 10
        +2
        There are few supporters of Russia among local residents.


        Let them then jump on.
  3. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 5 February 2016 06: 32
    11
    These are not Tatars, but quasi-Tatars that are sold as cheap street girls ... they need to be expelled into the turchin by force, but the local population is too amorphous and therefore allows any dishonesty on its neck
  4. itr
    itr 5 February 2016 06: 40
    -13 qualifying.
    The article was written by Dill !!!! his article is trying to bleed Russian Tatars
    This is how, for half a year, Ukrainians can Muslims do ???????? What the hell! it's just the local gangs are robbing the population. What did you forget how in Russia it was 90 to ride along the highways? here is the same
    1. Comrade Bender
      Comrade Bender 5 February 2016 09: 26
      11
      You are mistaken, my dear. The same picture was at one time in> Crimea. Where the Majlis of Chubarov and Dzhemilev comes, banditry arises.
      1. itr
        itr 5 February 2016 10: 51
        0
        Comrade Bender !!!! When were you in Crimea ????????
        1. Comrade Bender
          Comrade Bender 6 February 2016 18: 55
          0
          In 2009, Mr. I saw with my own eyes acts in the seizure of land and local attitudes towards them. And I continue to correspond with fellow soldiers from there. That's it, my dear.
      2. beck
        beck 5 February 2016 19: 50
        +2
        had a rest in Crimea in the 00s, met a neighbor from Simferopol and he told the following story: his colleague, a Tatar, moved with his family from Uzbekistan. his grandfather and grandmother were relocated from Crimea to Uzbekistan at the time, they took root there, children, grandchildren, relatives, friends, their business (children and grandchildren), the house is full. at one fine moment, guests came to their house and offered to move to their original homeland - to the Crimea, they were politely sent, they partedly offered to think well. a month later, these people returned and already in an ultimatum form offered to move, in case of disobedience they promised to arrange a fun life (fire in the house, accidents with relatives). so there was nothing left to do, they all hastily sold out and went to the already strange Crimea, in a pure field, where no one was relatives. in such a way the Crimean Tatars returned to their original homeland,
  5. pts-m
    pts-m 5 February 2016 06: 46
    +9
    These arisen questions on the settlement of Russian territories should be taken with all seriousness, and not wait for the thunder to strike. Really the tops of Russia do not see a clear threat? Or everything is ideologically agreed with urine. The results of this will not keep you waiting.
  6. ovod84
    ovod84 5 February 2016 07: 03
    +7
    We are tired of vigilantly guarding the Crimean border and intensifying the work of special services in the region and their scimitar run up against a steel Amuzgin blade or saber.
  7. parusnik
    parusnik 5 February 2016 07: 15
    +7
    It will end with the fact that the Tatars of Kherson declare independence from Ukraine, and go to bow to Turkey, like we are your bourgeois, take us to us, we have Kherson region .. and we will return Crimea together there ... and violinist (Ukraine) is not needed ..
  8. Balagan
    Balagan 5 February 2016 07: 24
    11
    Almost Kosovo option. Let us spend the night ...
  9. sa-ag
    sa-ag 5 February 2016 07: 45
    -21 qualifying.
    "... Moreover, when it comes to gas supplies for heating residential buildings, Russia even had to remember about charity. Gas was supplied free of charge."

    Is it one that was mined at the Arabat Spit and the excess of which was stored in a gas storage facility in the Crimea? Then it's no surprise that it's "free" :-)
    1. domokl
      domokl 5 February 2016 08: 14
      11
      Why write half the truth? Previously, there really was stored gas produced where you indicated. You know perfectly well that gas has not been supplied to the storages for two years now. Just because Ukraine did not want to pay for storage. So, Ukrainian is not there. Selected last winter.
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 5 February 2016 11: 06
      +2
      Quote: sa-ag
      Is it one that was mined at the Arabat Spit and the excess of which was stored in a gas storage facility in the Crimea? Then it's no surprise that it's "free" :-)

      This is the gas that Ukraine did not pay for storage at first. And after another reminder of payment - she began to burn excess gas, moving the arrows to the Crimea.
      ... for more than half a year, the Crimean gas storage facility has not accepted the surplus gas that occurs in the warm season during production from the Strelkovsky field. Therefore, the excess gas has to be burned.

      And like a cherry on a cake:
      3 April 2015 city
      Today, April 3, a session of the Genichesky District Council was held, during which the Council recognized Russia as an aggressor country.
      ... the deputy head of the Genichesk regional state administration, Aleksey Syshchenko, came to the session in an eloquent T-shirt - "PTN YLO la-la-la".

      And us for sho ?!
  10. Scud
    Scud 5 February 2016 07: 55
    +7
    The population of the Kherson region is half-maid, now the truth is already beginning to scratch turnips. But in any case, those great forces of the Majlis, Dogs, Azov create a dangerous and unpredictable tumor.
  11. standing
    standing 5 February 2016 08: 07
    +7
    A good sweep of 50 years helps.
  12. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 5 February 2016 08: 14
    +4
    Is there any sane population left? What are the fools waiting for? Or are they tired of living?
    It looks like the "brothers" decided to commit suicide.
    1. KVIRTU
      KVIRTU 5 February 2016 11: 59
      0
      I will add statistics: census 2001, Kherson region.
      Ukrainians 961,6 thousand people.
      Russians 165,2
      Tatars 5,4
      Crimean Tatars 2,1
      And further : ....Russians, the number of which, compared with the 1989 census, decreased by 33,8%.
      At the same time, the number of Armenians (3,8 times), Koreans (2,9 times), Tatars (2,5 times) and Azerbaijanis (1,7 times) increased in the region.
      As you can see, only for the year 89-2001 minus 33% of those who wrote in the column "nationality" Russian were reforged.
      1. iouris
        iouris 5 February 2016 13: 11
        +2
        "Ukrainian" is not a nationality. This is a calling.
        "Russian" is fate.
        These numbers do not mean anything. The main quality, not quantity. Ukraine is East European France. In order to destroy the royal power in France, it took 10 thousand agents.
      2. vignat21
        vignat21 5 February 2016 19: 53
        +2
        Do not forget that among 961,6 thousand Ukrainians, there will be 20 percent, while the rest Russians recorded them in the census by Ukrainians, supposedly to show, look in the Ukrainian region. This whole census is puffy.
        1. KVIRTU
          KVIRTU 7 February 2016 15: 09
          0
          Write nonsense. The census is usual, in 2001 there was no special need to "blow". People in the questionnaires could easily write what nationality they belong to.
          For comparison, data on the Crimea (from the same site of the state statistics of Ukraine):
          total xnumx
          Russian 1180,4 thousand
          Ukrainians 492,2
          Crimean Tatars 243,4
    2. Pirogov
      Pirogov 5 February 2016 12: 09
      +2
      What can they do? To make a rally, there were already a lot of them, only after they are hurt. Yes, and you should remember that they need to confront the armed groups of Tatar, Turkish, Azov, etc.
  13. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 February 2016 08: 15
    +5
    Poroshenko and Erdogan began direct financing of the Crimean Tatars in the Kherson region.

    Those. Together, they create an enclave of radical scumbags in the peak of the Crimea, and therefore Russia. Poroshenko completely drank brains. Doesn’t he understand what this can ultimately turn into for Ukraine itself? You don’t even have to be a conspiracy theorist to understand where the wind originally blows through Turkey.
  14. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 5 February 2016 08: 41
    0
    "A new Crimean Tatar autonomy is emerging on the border with Crimea. Without really advertising this, the Majlis is doing very serious work to Islamize the Kherson region."

    So send all the Tatars from the Crimea there. To reunite with fellow countrymen. And in their place, the Russians from the middle zone, as they used to gain population in Kaliningrad.
    1. svu93
      svu93 5 February 2016 09: 09
      0
      why so radical? there are many Tatars in Crimea who are satisfied with everything, including Russian passports.
    2. svu93
      svu93 5 February 2016 09: 09
      +1
      why so radical? there are many Tatars in Crimea who are satisfied with everything, including Russian passports.
    3. Curbstone xnumx
      Curbstone xnumx 5 February 2016 14: 02
      +2
      Do not touch the Tatars, in the Crimea there are plenty of normal Tatars who just want to live and that no one would touch them. I work with some of them and I can’t say a crooked word to them
      1. beck
        beck 5 February 2016 20: 00
        0
        many of them in the 00s were forcibly resettled from the places of resettlement of their grandfathers and grandmothers, they have already come under the distribution and resettlement once, a lesson for the rest of their lives
  15. Vega
    Vega 5 February 2016 09: 56
    +2
    Bandit bandit sees from far away. They sang on the ground to rob their own under the banner of the fight against Russia.
  16. Wolverine
    Wolverine 5 February 2016 10: 08
    +2
    Quote: Comrade Bender
    Where the Mejlis of Chubarov and Dzhemilev comes, banditry arises.


    Is there really such a great problem to remove these ghouls? So nobody needs it and it's sad ...
  17. Belousov
    Belousov 5 February 2016 10: 34
    0
    The problem is that our special services do not react in any way. If a dozen new arrivals suddenly "died in a car accident," then the flow of those who wish would not be so stormy.
  18. speelforce
    speelforce 5 February 2016 10: 47
    +1
    My colleague is a Tatar, from the service Kazan Kazan Tatars. They have their own hierarchy there, as the Crimean Tatars say, they are not Tatars at all, of course it correctly says that they are Tatars only by name. And so - guests from all stripes gathered.
  19. Petrik66
    Petrik66 5 February 2016 10: 52
    0
    Scimitar at the heart ..... well, why exaggerate? A gang of clowns in machine guns. The combat experience of most of these "jihadists": POSITION Near a power line blown up on its territory and blocking their own - hohlyatsky trucks on their own territory. Chatting, spreading semolina on a plate.
  20. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 5 February 2016 11: 31
    +3
    The instigators and performers of buza in Ukraine are not interested in the fate of the country. The main thing is to create hotbeds of tension with Russia. And the more they will be, the higher will be their fee. No one needs a strong and independent Ukraine in the modern world, where competition rules. Turkey is too far from Ukraine. It is unlikely that she will get there. This is not in the interests of Russia and the Russian Federation and will not allow Turkey to warm its hands there.
  21. engineer
    engineer 5 February 2016 12: 06
    0
    But they can create autonomy. If Ukraine falls apart, then this piece may well become Tatar under the influence of Turkey. And a new hotbed of radicals.
  22. koshmarik
    koshmarik 5 February 2016 12: 14
    +5
    The trouble with the Ukrainian people is that a modern political system with a whole range of parties, non-partisan public organizations, movements, etc., has not been formed in the country. Each crest lives on its own, therefore, for the Tatarization of the Kherson region, several thousand well-organized Tatars are enough, and a year later the Tatar-Turkish Chersonesos will appear on the Kate of Ukraine with mosques instead of churches, and Ukrainians lined with tribute will remain in remote villages and hamlets.
  23. Erg
    Erg 5 February 2016 20: 40
    0
    NKVD. Any questions? The mess is the path to self-destruction.
  24. King, just king
    King, just king 5 February 2016 21: 01
    -2
    Pancake! Here, some have already written about why the author drives the blizzard, for what purpose? Dear, I am a citizen of Russia and live in the Kherson region, not very far from the border. The author, if you read my post - there are specific facts of cattle theft, evictions from homes? There is - in the studio, no - there is nothing to sow fecal formations here and start people.
    Yeah, the Crimean Tatars are such fools that from more or less for so many years of inhabited places IN CRIMEA, shuffle the bride where by the name of the bride, yeah, right now.
    1. Scud
      Scud 5 February 2016 21: 54
      +2
      Hey king! Dress the St. George ribbon for May 9 or February 23 and walk with flowers in Kherson. Then tell about the feces.
      1. King, just king
        King, just king 5 February 2016 22: 36
        -2
        Hey SCUD! As a matter of fact, is there something to vyaknut, or is it also so, for the catch phrase? And turn to strangers on "you", do not go by and do not go.
  25. Bassoon
    Bassoon 5 February 2016 21: 48
    0
    Rather, a scimitar to the throat of Ukraine. Let's see how the dill will sing when they begin to live according to Sharia. And there, and before the emergence of a new center of instability, a stone's throw.
  26. Tavria666666555
    Tavria666666555 25 May 2016 21: 50
    0
    Indeed, we have learned to talk about historical boundaries. Crimean Khanate really "had access to the field." Crimea was only part of the Khanate. And that did not completely belong to the Tatars. So, the Kherson region can really be proclaimed the territory of the Crimean Tatars with the appropriate stretch. lol what do you smoke ??? The Kherson region is not only a field, learn all its nature and resources; secondly, Rashka stole gas from the Strelkovoye field of the Genichesk region and brazenly stole the Crimea even before the occupation, and thirdly, even if Patrashenko somehow makes concessions to the Tatars, they have nothing will come out and the "heart" of the Crimea nafig is not necessary, and if the Kherson region is renamed, then it will be Tavria, about the Tatars, almost true recently on one of the social networks, Tatarinjemilevsky himself stated that the south is chancy and that it would be nice to return both it and the Crimea to historical borders