Military Review

Are we starting a hysteria in the “Russian go” style again?

66
And again, the British TV channel BBC. This time, though, the Air Force-2, but is there a difference in numbers? The main thing is the essence. And the bottom line is that the British journalists from television journalism launched an absolutely provocative broadcast and an equally stupid reality show with the big name “World War III. View from headquarters.”


Are we starting a hysteria in the “Russian go” style again?


Naturally, Russia is the instigator and aggressor in the third world war. There are no options. And, in fact, the point is not even in the fact that in the frankly weak scenario that television creators from the Air Force made, Russia is unleashing a war. This will not surprise anyone today.

The very fact that a fantastic plot, invented incomprehensibly under the influence of what means, is discussed on the air by very specific people. Those who occupied, I note, earlier, very high posts. Former ambassador to Russia Tony Brenton, former ambassador to the UN Christopher Mayer, former chief of staff of the British Navy, Admiral West and other former, but no less senior officials in the past.

It is surprising some ease with which a half dozen famous people in Britain rushed to discuss the plot. And here, apparently, it's not about fees. The member of the House of Lords, Baroness Faulkner, has an exact order with money. Although, to be honest, she looks the most adequate in this company.

Let's return to the plot. Russia is organizing some unrest in the territory of Latvia and Estonia with the help of the Russian-speaking population. What for? To (attention!) To separate in their favor the territory and population of these areas. A sort of Ukraine number two.

An interesting idea of ​​our Baltic micro-neighbors. If you thoughtfully try to understand what is bungled, then it turns out that on the territory of independent states there are entire reservation areas in which there are some Russian-speaking elements who sleep and see that they will live in Russia. Nothing like?

Crimea smacks? Oh yeah! According to the full program.

Well, the main question that the participants of the show are discussing: how can Latvia help? She is a member of NATO, anyway. And the actors playing in the show the role of representatives of the same Latvia and (of course, as without them!) The USA, with might and main hurry the participants with making decisions.

And naturally, NATO is being drawn into this "conflict." You know, if only actors were participants of the show, it would not look so disgusting. But, alas, on the screen are people who most recently determined the military policy of Britain. And from their mouths, Russia is an unconditional enemy, with whom one should not stand on ceremony and in respect of which nuclear power can be applied. weapon. And not just possible, but even necessary.

The main vile "highlight" of the film show is the inclusion of real, non-fiction episodes. There are enough game episodes, but we are dealing with the most despicable thing — when documentary inclusions are included in the big lie, which make the viewer treat the fantastic brew as real-world events. Indeed, in fact, the channel of the Air Force-2 is famous for the fact that its programs discuss real events and use documentary footage.

And here is the documentary footage. From Ukraine and New Russia. What gives a frankly fictional story some claim to documentary. But agree, and how much should an ordinary British man in the street? Yes, "sniff the cork and look at the pineapple" - and the client is ready, as they say. A bit of Russian mate, real footage of fighting in the Donbas, Kalashnikov assault rifles among combatants. Yes, and a few frankly unshaven and tanned faces in the frame. Enough. And some "understatement" of the participants plus frank statements on the topic "how to save Europe from the Russians".



On the one hand, the conflict is invented from beginning to end. But at the same time, television strategists are thinking how to resist the real president of Russia. And stop Russia, seeking to seize the territory of its neighbors.

Admiral West: "Destroying control objects in Moscow with a missile volley of one submarine will not be enough. You need to send a second boat to the combat area. This will be a good warning."

How can I comment on what was said? Differently. Even considering the frankly fantastic show. But it is not said by an actor. This is said by the admiral. I do not presume to judge how seriously West took this, but it doesn’t look funny on many points.

Perhaps it would not have been so sad if it were another Hollywood blockbuster. But here, alas, there is a serious analytical channel specializing in the discussion of real world problems.

So we have the fact of forcing anti-Russian hysteria in the best traditions of the Cold War. Again creating the image of the enemy. And again in the face of Russian. And again, very, very famous people take part in creating this image.

Yes, a nuclear strike on the script was dealt. Naturally, Russia. On the ships of the NATO group. But for some reason, the “experts” in the program are discussing not a retaliatory strike against Russian ships or military installations, but against cities. And discuss violently and painfully. Good figure, is not it?

Obviously, one thought still exists in the brains of participants who are firmly stuck in the 60-70 years of the last century. The fact that Russia is an enemy, and it is necessary to destroy not only its military potential, but the entire population. What they can and congratulate. And we answered - with such, if I may say so, "partners."

Two aspects are surprising. Namely, with what ease in Britain the former high-sitting ladies and gentlemen rushed to create the image of the enemy. And the second. For some reason, no participant in the show has the idea that things can “fly in with greetings” from Russia are much more serious than those carried by three British submarines of nuclear deterrence forces. And what are these three submarines for the Russian army.

One gets the feeling that Britain is somewhere near the center of the Earth. Or on the back of the moon. And so you can safely discuss how two of the three submarines at once will sweep away all the military power of Russia. Well, under the gin and tonic, it’s quite a ride.

Yes, the tale on the Air Force-2 came up with all the heart. Both former and retired leaders joined in full. But a fairy tale is a lie, but there is a hint in it ...

Of course, it is a pity that such a well-known and respected (not without reason) channel, like the Air Force, began to slip into the maelstrom of political order. It is a pity that without having any more or less reliable justifications, from Russia they began urgently to sculpt the image of the enemy of all humanity.

But by and large, we will not have to regret it. What a bit of consolation. How can the British be comforted by the fact that soon they will have no time for Russians in the Baltic States. They have enough of their own. Similar to those from the movie. Dark, bearded, well aware of how to use AK.

So it’s not worth waiting for the Russians. You, dear British, enough of their own. British, German, French. It is clear who we are talking about.

And we definitely will not touch Latvia. In full accordance with the eternal Russian harmfulness and unpredictability.
Author:
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 5 February 2016 06: 24
    14
    These serials and the unfounded false cries of NATO and the United States about our super-aggressiveness are an example of psychological self-hypnosis that Russia is an "ogressor" power - and against it all means and ends are good, up to the invasion ...
    1. KAV
      KAV 5 February 2016 10: 40
      10
      If it was only a self-suggestion ... This is not itself. This is the most complete suggestion. They methodically and systematically began to grind, yes, precisely to grind, the Euro-NATO hamsters the idea that Russia is an evil that must be destroyed before the invasion of their territory. Why did their territory surrender to us, and indeed, why did they all surrender to us - they simply do not talk about it, because there is no need. The goal is not to explain something. The goal is to form anti-Russian opinion and hysteria. So that later there was no need to justify their aggressive actions against us, then later on this also cut down political ratings ...
      1. Chiropractor
        Chiropractor 5 February 2016 12: 30
        +3
        Englishwoman shits ...
        1. IrOqUoIs
          IrOqUoIs 5 February 2016 13: 05
          +2
          And tomorrow they wake up, and really will ask:
          - Well, did the Russians attack us?
          Insanity grows stronger.
          Projection ukro-maidan some kind on our country. Everyone thinks, We will seek some reason for the manifestation of our post-imperial ways. And fot, figs to you!
      2. Pete mitchell
        Pete mitchell 5 February 2016 20: 27
        +8
        Simply put, they are preparing the masses of the people for war.
      3. NIKNN
        NIKNN 5 February 2016 20: 37
        +4

        Gentlemen, Americans, we must be friends! We have about 70% of the male population in Tanchiki chopped for days - train! If Che, we warned you!
        1. Remy_Argo
          Remy_Argo 6 February 2016 19: 43
          0
          mdyayaya ... am that's for sure ... ready to kill
  2. Koshak
    Koshak 5 February 2016 06: 33
    12
    Back in the 70s. one missile was enough for this "unsinkable aircraft carrier". One, Karl! We would sit quietly .... This is not D, B! these are ... very bad people.
  3. hohkn
    hohkn 5 February 2016 06: 38
    +4
    Clients for "Kashchenko".
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 5 February 2016 07: 11
      20
      Quote: hohkn
      Clients for "Kashchenko".

      This is not Kashchenko, these are smart liars. They are pushing their population to the idea that a warrior is inevitable. Preparing for slaughter.
      Then it’s already possible to start the war with Russia first, but at the same time say that it is a retaliatory strike. Or they’ll play it out before it was in Georgia. They said on TV that Saka was killed and Russia started the war with Georgia.
      They will do the same for themselves, there will be panic and chaos. We will be guilty again, evil Russia brought their population to paranoia
      1. Mikhail Krapivin
        Mikhail Krapivin 5 February 2016 08: 50
        11
        I agree with every word. In the same picture, the constant false throws of the US administration fit perfectly, which they then reluctantly refute, after a few days. So it will be — they will blow something up somewhere, there’s a sensation on all the channels — the Russians attacked us! They immediately demolish us all over the country — and three days later, excuse me, we didn’t look there, in general, the Russians didn’t guess at us, but now it no longer matters ...
      2. Mik13
        Mik13 5 February 2016 09: 15
        +7
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        This is not Kashchenko, these are smart liars. They are pushing their population to the idea that a warrior is inevitable. Preparing for slaughter.
        Then it’s already possible to start the war with Russia first, but at the same time say that it is a retaliatory strike. Or they’ll play it out before it was in Georgia. They said on TV that Saka was killed and Russia started the war with Georgia.
        They will do the same for themselves, there will be panic and chaos. We will be guilty again, evil Russia brought their population to paranoia

        There is a non-zero probability that after ALL of the consequences of the new crisis occur, it will be easier for them to kill their own population than to agree. The new 17 year is not Russia winking, but just the same Britain.
        There is also Switzerland next to its ideas of a "guaranteed social minimum" ...

        You can, for example, introduce martial law inside the country (without a real war), establish total censorship, turn off the Internet. And to the population to say that NATO is at war with the Russian Federation, to blow up something to convince ...

        Your word, comrade Orwell ...
        1. stalkerwalker
          stalkerwalker 5 February 2016 11: 33
          +7
          Quote: Mik13
          Your word, comrade Orwell ...

          There is Russia Today in the broadcasting network of British TV channels. Normal Britons have long been "checking" the Air Force tales with the Russian RT.
          The BBC scarecrows are the EU-sponsored response to the Russian "information war" buzzed about by Euro-liberals. The other day, K. Shakhnazarov at Solovyov's "Duel" Kolya Zlobin "smeared", and that Tokma turned out to bleat in response.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Hyppopotut
        Hyppopotut 5 February 2016 09: 24
        +5
        "Then you can start a war with Russia first, but at the same time declare that this is a retaliatory strike"
        And to whom to declare and who will be after the retaliatory strike of Russia? hi
  4. Jääkorppi
    Jääkorppi 5 February 2016 06: 41
    10
    So what? Who does it surprise? Is there anyone else besides the paid liberals or just the narrow-minded, limited people who believe that Russia is expected with open arms in Europe? (Except as a meal). Or is history not teaching anyone? Respect the strong!
  5. Volga Cossack
    Volga Cossack 5 February 2016 06: 42
    +4
    a new round of the Cold War - the budget needs to be cut both by the geyrope and mattresses ....... okay - persuaded - I’ll cover the balalaika with fresh varnish - I’ll feed and go to America to fight. funny ....... if it weren’t so sad ........
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 5 February 2016 08: 06
      +6
      Quote: Volga Cossack
      a new round of the Cold War - the budget needs to be cut both by the geyrope and mattresses ....... okay - persuaded - I’ll cover the balalaika with fresh varnish - I’ll feed and go to America to fight. funny ....... if it weren’t so sad ........

      And shaw, so right, sober and let's go? drinks laughing
  6. Constructor1
    Constructor1 5 February 2016 06: 43
    +9
    Oh, they don't know our sayings ... "As it comes around, it will respond"
  7. shimus
    shimus 5 February 2016 06: 49
    +6
    They not only do not know the sayings, they also do not teach history!
    They tried to conquer Russia as soon as they didn’t attack, they fucked up one figs awesomely, did it, even before reaching the Urals.
  8. salad
    salad 5 February 2016 06: 53
    +2
    Damn when the Russian Federation will pay compensation for PR laughing but in fact it is ukrovirus tupizmus
  9. ArhipenkoAndrey
    ArhipenkoAndrey 5 February 2016 07: 07
    +4
    As they say, dark people who are completely not friends with their heads will not understand in any way that Russia does not need ALL the Baltic countries, an eternal hemorrhoids. Of course, maybe this is why they are trying to do everything that the Russians took them for themselves, because they themselves are tired of the parasites. In general, it is very similar to powerless malice, because by and large, apart from sanctions and dirty tricks from human rights defenders, who are practically blind in both eyes, they can’t do anything, so at least they can amuse their sick imagination, and they dream of a war rather than a peaceful one coexistence with Russia.
    1. pensioneree
      pensioneree 5 February 2016 12: 13
      0
      Here hope slipped through: -Latvia- "for what", Estonia "thinks for what"
  10. ovod84
    ovod84 5 February 2016 07: 08
    +2
    They are afraid that the point is trembling with partners once such forecasts and films are made, I wonder why a nuclear missile was sent to aircraft carriers even better in Scotland, where their nuclear base is.
  11. Hooks
    Hooks 5 February 2016 07: 18
    +4
    I would not be surprised if soon the State Department, citing secret photographs that cannot be demonstrated, will require Russia to explain its intentions to deliver a nuclear strike against Sweden. Sorry, not that branch ... Although, let it be.
  12. parusnik
    parusnik 5 February 2016 07: 19
    +2
    Apparently in Europe, the problem with refugees is very acute, but not only is the problem with them, if they shout “Russians are coming!” .. We must distract the peoples from the problems ..
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 5 February 2016 14: 03
      +2
      Quote: parusnik
      Apparently in Europe, the problem with refugees is very acute, but not only is the problem with them, if they shout “Russians are coming!” .. We must distract the peoples from the problems ..

      They more than once distracted them from their problems, so much so that after that half of Europe lay in ruins. And why? Because history teaches them nothing. Masochists in one word. In World War II, they were also going to join forces to destroy the USSR, and what was the result? They ogrebli, licked the wounds and again - "The Russians are coming !!!" - again they unite efforts to get it on the ears.
      Now, if things get hotter, then you just need to create a "collective farm named after Buratino" there and no longer allow any amateur performance.
  13. Yak28
    Yak28 5 February 2016 07: 27
    +4
    NATO can calmly strike at Russia and make it appear as if Russia attacked first and everyone will believe it. What is the use of the statement of the General Staff with evidence about the complicity of the Turks in terrorists, no one hears or listens to Russia. Even if they show how the soldiers NATO is killing civilians, they are teaching Ukrainian bandits to kill their own population, no one in the world will pay attention to this, for all Russia is a bad point.
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 5 February 2016 08: 13
      +4
      Quote: Yak28
      NATO can calmly strike at Russia and make it appear as if Russia attacked first and everyone will believe it ..

      I’m afraid that after that I believe I don’t believe there will be no one to play chamomile. Well, those who are lucky (will they be lucky?) Will be busy with a completely different, more pressing matter than finding out who was the first.
  14. bionik
    bionik 5 February 2016 07: 29
    +2
    Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov commented on BBC Two movie
    - “It's a pity to waste time on cheap things.”
  15. nivander
    nivander 5 February 2016 07: 44
    21
    Russians are coming
    1. pensioneree
      pensioneree 5 February 2016 12: 18
      +2
      God forbid raped! (So this is the same monument-all the same raped). angry
  16. Pig
    Pig 5 February 2016 07: 52
    +3
    "Of course, it's a pity that such a well-known and respected (not without reason) channel, like the BBC, began to slide into a maelstrom of political zakazukh" "
    Yes Yes! "rolls down" aha ... the bibisi has always been a weapon of propaganda and has always been engaged in political zakazukha and chernukha!
    like Vysotsky: "... and then they will trumpet bibi about this case!"
    this is all a burp of "perestroika", it is then that the bibisi does not know with what fright they declared a "non-biased and not dependent" channel ...
  17. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 5 February 2016 08: 09
    +2
    Geeks are jumping, we will make them their fiction a reality.
  18. Irbenwolf
    Irbenwolf 5 February 2016 08: 14
    17
    No wonder the behavior of the Western media, surprisingly the behavior of the Russian side. Even in the best of times (90-2000) there were films about Soviet (read Russian) aggression. I'm not talking about the most important source of forming opinions among fragile minds - computer games. One RedAlert series is worth it. And in Modern Warfare you just need to mow down peaceful people at the Russian airport - just for fun. I emphasize thesis American-English commandos are ALLOWED to kill Russian people. This in the view of the authors is not at all a tragedy.

    After all this, those around them are surprised that those who speak Russian are not spared during military operations. Yes, because hamsters are hammered in even in childhood (indirectly) the idea that Russian is not a person, because the armies of "developed countries", according to propaganda, fight only "according to the rules", and if such things get into game content, then it is possible.

    It's practically Goebbels, just wrapped in plush. But the Hitler Youth is growing.

    It is necessary to answer. Instead of grinning that "these are just games." Games. But the mindset is firmly in place.
    1. sds87
      sds87 5 February 2016 10: 45
      +2
      I agree with you. When I was still playing games on my computer, I got to play Modern Warfare. From the very beginning ofigel from the gameplay with the shooting of civilians at the airport. And I am sure there are many such games. This is all - brainwashing. Russians, Russia and Chechens - they all put the terrorists under one comb. Moreover, the Chechens in the games called Russian. Prescribed installation - Russian - terrorist - to kill. This completely discouraged me the desire to play PC games. But then I read on the gaming forums how the players praised these games, and said that this was just a game ... True, there were many who were just as disgusted to play such games. The information war is in full swing. The young generation perceives us Russians in the world as savages with AK, which must be destroyed. And this is scary!
      1. Petrix
        Petrix 5 February 2016 12: 08
        +2
        Quote: sds87
        they said it was just a game ...

        Such personalities let the images of their children, parents, relatives and friends bring into the game. Let them shoot at them. If you raise your hand to play such a game - you can safely isolate them from society.
    2. Petrix
      Petrix 5 February 2016 12: 04
      -1
      Quote: IrbenWolf
      It is necessary to answer.

      You say it right. But please explain how to respond?
      1. Irbenwolf
        Irbenwolf 5 February 2016 16: 34
        +1
        You need to answer symmetrically. "Launch pre-emptive strikes" like Rtoday does now. As for games ... You just need to give out a product in which to subtly hint that "controlled chaos" is primarily the blood from which individual countries extract purely resource dividends. Equip a couple of "catch phrases" of prominent "American hawks" (they have said a lot of interesting things over the past 10 years) and the "alternative view" is ready.
  19. serkhan
    serkhan 5 February 2016 08: 20
    +3
    Yes, the scenario’s nuclear strike was delivered. Naturally, by Russia

    Everyone, of course, remembers the tragedy in the United States on September 11, so in order to "blind the hunchback" our overseas "partners" may not be stingy (as you can see from the show) not even by the city, but by the whole country.
  20. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 February 2016 08: 32
    +3
    alas, a serious analytical channel specializing in discussing real world problems.

    Perhaps he was once serious. In my opinion yesterday on the program of R. Babayan it was said that a year ago almost the entire leadership of the Air Force was replaced for the release of a documentary film about "English tricks" in the last wars. Therefore, one should not expect the professionalism of the previous one from the new Air Force. Government order is above company policy.
  21. Warm Padded Jacket
    Warm Padded Jacket 5 February 2016 08: 38
    +2
    let them feed the pros themselves, we do not need rogues)
  22. Hammer
    Hammer 5 February 2016 08: 41
    +6
    Well, the main question that the participants of the show discuss: how to help Latvia? She is a member of NATO

    Ahaha, how funny they are! It will be the same as with Finland at 39. At first, they promised hundreds of divisions of elite British-French troops, support for the Navy, and almost mountains of gold for the economy, if only they would continue to provoke the USSR. And as patience ran out, as the war began, so at the Finnish screams immediately mooing about "last a couple of months" and the moral support of the entire world community. As a result, it turned out that no ships left their ports, no divisions were preparing for a march to the east. An epic Anglo-Saxon sink, and you say, Latvia ...
  23. ser-pov
    ser-pov 5 February 2016 08: 43
    +3
    It feels like they are trying to scare us. Like, if you start to fight against the NATO country, we will start the 3rd world! And who are our troops now pulling to the border with Syria ..? All these are horror stories ... Discuss! And with the Turks, too, it simply will not happen, only if we immediately preemptively hit the military facilities in Turkey. But everything goes to this .. How damn tired ... ur.fool
  24. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 5 February 2016 09: 00
    +1
    Fools, not to show the effects of nuclear bombing in Japan. There is a mass of material. But, unfortunately, the Anglo-Saxons lost fear. They simply cannot imagine what a nuclear attack is. They are used to fighting the Tuareg and Bantu tribes.

    It turns out that there is no difference between politicians, actors and clowns. This big top really bothered me.
  25. Neophyte
    Neophyte 5 February 2016 09: 09
    +2
    Session of House No. 6! Why the hell did we get this territory of Livonia and other Estonia?
    In Mother Russia, what is missing from the country?
  26. scrap123
    scrap123 5 February 2016 09: 18
    +1
    afraid means respected with ... ki
  27. tomeng
    tomeng 5 February 2016 09: 35
    0
    And the British there too .. What is so super important in this Baltic? Nakoy she Russia? Well, except for the next crap.
  28. Belousov
    Belousov 5 February 2016 10: 05
    +1
    And none of these clown politicians want to explain what for the Baltic parasites are needed? There are no natural resources there, the population is also almost gone, all the more qualified, everyone left who was in demand. Feed these idlers again? No, they were fed them for 50 years, and then they were the first to bark against Russia. So let them sit and choke with their bile, all the same, they have nothing but sprat and bile.
  29. Achilles
    Achilles 5 February 2016 10: 07
    0
    They are doing this in order to justify future costs in Eastern Europe + once again make us an evil empire, most importantly we know that all Anglo-Saxons are evil that will be done away sooner or later
  30. Aitvaras
    Aitvaras 5 February 2016 10: 18
    -4
    Lithuania is very serious about this. Last year, the Vilna and Klaipeda people's republics were announced, in the image of the Donbass in Ukraine. Signatures were collected. Specialist. Lithuanian services reacted quickly. Now we are demanding to deploy NATO tank brigades in Lithuania. We are buying modern equipment for the Lithuanian army. The "Union of Riflemen", Lithuania received NATO assault rifles, will soon allow shooters to keep weapons at home. Why does Russia need Lithuania? Then I think it's better to ask Mr. Zhirinovsky why "Stalin's gifts" Vilnius and Klaipeda are needed. Yesterday at VO, there was an article about NATO being unable to defend the Baltic states, so there some commentators quite clearly explained why Russia needs the Baltic states.
    1. Geser
      Geser 5 February 2016 13: 07
      +2
      The Air Force did not give in its plot an answer to two main questions. The first is why Russia should conquer the Baltic states. The second - are American and European soldiers, accustomed to remote push-button warfare, really ready to fight, to enter into direct fire contact with the enemy for the sake of the Baltic states? Personally, I can answer you. First, Russia does not need to capture the Baltic states. For what? For the sake of access to the sea? It has long been available thanks to Peter the Great. There are no unique minerals for the sake of which the Baltic states should fight. Thus, from a purely practical point of view, there is no reason to invade the Baltic states. The second - neither Americans nor Europeans will die in battle for the sake of some Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians. The morale of the NATO soldiers is low, the NATO are too used to fighting remotely, without coming into contact with the enemy. It is also worth considering that Westerners, mainly Americans love to fight in comfort. An example - during the war in Iraq, American soldiers refused to go into battle until they brought orange juice. It was really like that. So learn - you do not need either Russia or the West as such. Nobody will fight with you or die for you.
      1. Aitvaras
        Aitvaras 5 February 2016 14: 04
        -8
        This is your private opinion, it would be good if the majority in Russia thought so, but we have reason to think that this is not the case. The theory of the "Russian World" -g. Dugin, this is the ideological basis of Russian foreign policy, it is from there that all the statements of Mr. Zhirinovsky about the need to restore the borders of Russia, at the beginning of 1917, and like-minded people, these politicians, are enough in Russia, even here if you read the comments in VO I think that this BBC documentary has the same grounds.
        1. Lekov L
          Lekov L 5 February 2016 16: 28
          +5
          Cold pickle with a hangover helps.
          But if you smoked something stronger than the fly agarics - then be careful - irreversible changes could occur.
          Even me, the one who was born in the Lithuanian SSR, "in the ever-occupied territory" in the family of the occupier, your wretched (today) "area" is not needed.
          Especially with such a population.
          I think that in fifteen years you will run away from all three republics.
          The part on earnings, the part from an old age will die out, and the dark-haired lads with BV will squeeze the rest.
          Then we will take our lands and take the cheryavchenky work: we have a lot of land.
          I can not see - age ..
          But if I live I will come and worship the graves of my father's friends.
          If you have not destroyed these gravestones. Although there are your countrymen.
          I hope you personally understand that Russia will not feed your countries, and then why fight?
          And you yourself and so bend.
          I have the honor.
        2. Geser
          Geser 8 February 2016 08: 11
          +1
          The Air Force clearly read Tom Clancy, who became famous for fiction where the USSR and NATO fight in World War III without using nuclear weapons against each other. Moreover, NATO always wins. I repeat once again - from a practical point of view, capturing the Baltic States for Russia is devoid of any sense, and the highest echelons of power are also sure of this. You yourself, as such, dream that we will return and again put you on your neck. After all, Europe does not feed very satisfyingly. Just do not wait, we will not come. In our place dark-skinned bearded men and blacks from Europe will come to you. As for the Russian world, Russia is restoring lost ties with compatriots and begins to protect and help them, correcting the mistake of the 90s when millions of Russians were without the support and protection of Russia. So there is no need to hysteria about this, any self-respecting country protects its citizens and compatriots.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  31. Gene_24
    Gene_24 5 February 2016 10: 33
    +2
    I remember that in August 2008 Ukraine was very worried that Russia would fight with Ukraine, Georgia was just a rehearsal. The British were worried about Ukraine (for example, I found the first article that came across in August 2008 on the Ukrainian site): http://www.segodnya.ua/newsarchive/nashi-korabli-ne-vypuckajut-iz-hruzii-jushche
    nko-boitcja-chto-ukrainu-vtjanut-v-vojnu.html. "Britain warns of the threat of an armed conflict between Ukrainians and Russians if Ukraine does not allow the return of Russian ships from the Caucasus to Crimea," said James Sherr, program manager for Russia and Eurasia at the British Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    "Russia has been thinking about Ukraine from the very beginning of this conflict. Of course, Russia's goal is not limited to South Ossetia or Georgia," the British expert noted.
    At that time it was hard to believe that there would be such a "tense" relationship with Ukraine. Now the soil is being prepared in the Baltics ...
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. triglav
    triglav 5 February 2016 11: 18
    +3
    England always hated Russia. And she fought with other people’s hands. So there is nothing surprising in this concoction.
  34. gramatey
    gramatey 5 February 2016 11: 31
    +1
    In my opinion, the demonstration of this film is needed in order to study the feedback of the EU society on the creation of a media, pseudo-real cause for war.
    Dans: a well-known media company; real characters are politicians; cutting real footage from any conflict; production shots.
    Objective: to assess the degree of confidence of the audience in what is said and shown, according to the criterion "truth"
    Surely learned, correct the flaws.
    Gleivitz or an attack on the twins to organize costly and long. Now it will be possible to get by with one studio.
  35. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 5 February 2016 11: 34
    +1
    The thief is the first to scream - hold the thief.
  36. afrikanez
    afrikanez 5 February 2016 12: 19
    +1
    So the descendants of UBLU DK A-Churchill participate in this show, and so it should be treated like that. am
  37. Kostyanich
    Kostyanich 5 February 2016 12: 26
    0
    I will also be engaged in sofa analytics smile How many high-explosive land mines are needed to divide the UK
    to many islands?
    1. Lekov L
      Lekov L 5 February 2016 16: 33
      0
      Four!
      If you regret the Scots ..
    2. Geser
      Geser 6 March 2016 16: 27
      0
      And on a fig on these Britons to spend nuclear landmines? They will soon become slaves to their former colonists, whose number now exceeds the white population in Britain. And they are already starting to kick the British. And they dutifully accept it.
  38. iouris
    iouris 5 February 2016 12: 37
    0
    The West is waging an aggressive war. So far, only in B. Vostok. The Russians intervened. It is necessary to deprive the Russians of moral support for the population of Europe and B. Vostok.
    All more or less significant events and statements are aimed at solving this particular problem.
    The Air Force lost its former respectability. Recently, a Norwegian movie was uploaded. It would be necessary to show these films in the Russian Federation. The rating of power will increase at times.
  39. cap
    cap 5 February 2016 13: 05
    +1
    "Admiral West:" It will not be enough to destroy command facilities in Moscow with a missile salvo of one submarine. It is necessary to send a second boat to the combat area. This will be a good warning. "
    "On the screen are people who recently determined the military policy of Britain. And in their mouths Russia is an unconditional enemy with whom one should not stand on ceremony and against which nuclear weapons can be used. And it is not just possible, but even necessary."
    "The very fact that a fantastic story, invented by some unknown means, is being discussed on the air by very specific people. I will note that previously held very high posts. Former ambassador to Russia Tony Brenton, former ambassador to the UN Christopher Mayer, former chief of staff British Navy Admiral West and others, former, but no less senior officials in the past. "

    The plot is fantastic, and the ladies and gentlemen endowed with power yesterday and claiming it in the future participate in the show. I personally perceive the fact of participation of such persons in provocations against Russia as a threat.
    If our liberals, seeing their idol in the eyepiece of a telescopic sight, demand that Ramzan Kadyrov be held accountable, I really want to see them in domestic television debates on the topic “Britain has blown its roof off.” I will gladly listen to the excuses for libel which cannot be found words. Well, perhaps from nautical slang. hi
  40. Ortrega
    Ortrega 5 February 2016 13: 26
    +1
    The creators of this film are very seriously ill. They have an irreversibly disturbed nervous system and suffering from schizophrenia. I, personally, feel sorry for them)))
  41. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 5 February 2016 14: 05
    +3
    Quote: bionik
    Press Secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov commented on the BBC Two- “It’s a pity to waste time on cheap stuff.”

    Rightly said.
    But even more convincing is this inscription on the American flag
  42. Pre-cat
    Pre-cat 5 February 2016 14: 19
    +1
    Creating an image of the enemy (in this case, Russia) allows you to cut good money. Under the brand name "Russians are coming" you can push through an increase in the military budget, for example. And this is an increase in the income of companies carrying out military orders. All these former admirals, ambassadors and members of the House of Peers are not feeding on the holy spirit. Surely they have their own financial interests in the military-industrial complex. English high society has always been distinguished by the ability to make money in war. Let us recall at least the "exploits" of Admiral Drake, who robbed the Spanish galleons. Members of the royal family, led by the queen, invested in the equipment of his ships. And from bloodthirsty pirates Drake and others like him turned into respectable privateers. Although the difference can not be seen in a microscope. But Captain Kidd (also equipped with the means of the crown) closed the share - he was hanged as a pirate.
    But now to raise bad manners on the mast of the Jolly Roger. There are other "relatively honest" ways of taking money from the population. Including the transfer of budgetary money from social needs to the needs of defense against evil Russians. In addition, the creation of a pre-war atmosphere is beneficial to the elite for a number of reasons. For example, you can cut off the oxygen by imagining free media. Let them just try to tell about the fact that over the past 100 years Russia has only initiated hostilities a couple of times. And that is forced. Yes, for this they (the media) will immediately be labeled as Putin's agents. You can also limit a number of civil rights of the population. After all, the war is on the nose - or are you not patriots? In general, under the stories of a terrible Russian bear, ready to crawl out of the den and tear all many good-hearted people, you can collect. Hence all the screams about the Russian threat. Yes, we need them ...
  43. realist
    realist 5 February 2016 19: 01
    0
    I didn’t understand here, is it really something unusual? in my opinion, command-and-staff games are held regularly both with us and with them, what is happening there thank God they don’t show the masses, well? and here they showed in general the same thing only with artists (albeit former military and politicians), so what! I do not understand .....
  44. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 5 February 2016 19: 02
    0
    The Masonic elite keeps the "public" in a Russophobic tone. So they are preparing a specific dirty trick against Russia. The main thing is that the "public", in the event of an accomplished dirty trick, would react in the direction they need.
  45. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 5 February 2016 19: 16
    +7
    She, even a nurse, has a Masonic status))
  46. UNFAMILIAR
    UNFAMILIAR 5 February 2016 22: 12
    +1
    I don't understand how the epic "historical" film "Raid", presented by Parashenko, was missed on VO, "1500 Russian shells at the pontoon crossing, with the direct work of the GRU spotters, we have a lot of wounded, few armored personnel carriers on the move," you are here discussing Norwegian and English fiction laughing