Military Review

The American research center together with the Pentagon came to the conclusion that the Russian army in three days will crush the NATO contingent in the Baltic States

145
The American Strategic Research Center RAND Corporation, together with representatives of the Pentagon, conducted a "simulation of military operations in Eastern Europe." In the simulation, NATO troops in the Baltic states on the one hand and the Russian army on the other were represented as opponents. Edition Foregn policy publishes material on the conclusions that were made after the simulation of a combat collision.


The American research center together with the Pentagon came to the conclusion that the Russian army in three days will crush the NATO contingent in the Baltic States


The conclusions were as follows: Russian troops would smash the NATO forces in the Baltic States in no more than three days. From the material:
NATO military personnel, including the Baltic countries, using the support of the American aviation, could not stop the advance of mechanized units of the RF Armed Forces and suffered heavy losses. The United States and other NATO representatives in the Baltic countries do not have enough soldiers and equipment that would be enough to confront the Russian troops.


This conclusion is published on behalf of such representatives. RAND Corporation like Michael Johnson and and David Shlapak.

The material also says that the NATO countries could counterattack Russian forces “advancing across the Baltic territory”, but “this would entail the involvement of the RF armed forces in the conflict zone”.

This is not the first such statement from Western experts, who, in all likelihood, stubbornly lead to NATO increasing its forces in the Baltic countries.
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru
145 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 4 February 2016 16: 21
    59
    Why ??? where are our soldiers so long they will hang around-poured NATO troops goziki watered or what ???
    1. Vend
      Vend 4 February 2016 16: 27
      23
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      Why ??? where are our soldiers so long they will hang around-poured NATO troops goziki watered or what ???

      Well, they also want to somehow show the coolness of their NATO laughing Russian troops will defeat any military formations of NATO, for one simple reason they are smeared with a thin layer in a large number of countries, for the sake of intimidation. However, NATO is no longer afraid.
      1. Wheel
        Wheel 4 February 2016 16: 40
        17
        It is necessary for NATO in the Baltic states to deploy the xoxlac contingent, here those stopudovo will destroy the entire Russian armored cavalry and all the paratroopers to the heap ... twenty times every day ... and without losses ..
        And then, look, "The military of the NATO countries, including the Baltic countries, using the support of American aviation, could not stop the advance of the mechanized units of the Russian Armed Forces and suffered heavy losses."
        1. alex-s
          alex-s 4 February 2016 16: 44
          +5
          NATO needs in the Baltic states

          Moreover, the kakly still whistle so beautifully about the "Debaltsevo bridgehead"!
          1. Mahmut
            Mahmut 4 February 2016 18: 00
            +7
            What are 3 more days. August 2 will begin, 2nd and finish.
            1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
              Uncle VasyaSayapin 4 February 2016 19: 01
              +3
              3 days. The Poles will block the border and the Balts will block all roads leaving for Poland.
            2. Chaplain wk
              Chaplain wk 5 February 2016 00: 02
              +1
              Capsozacidone again? 41st is not enough? On foreign territory and with little blood ... But is there any provocation from NATA: they say, the Baltic States is a convenient place for an easy breakthrough of our armored wedges?
              1. Marconi41
                Marconi41 5 February 2016 00: 54
                +2
                Quote: Chaplain WK
                Capsozacidone again? 41st is not enough? On foreign territory and little blood

                You're right. Not without it. Although, in order to draw the conclusions of the RAND Corporation, a big mind is not needed. It is enough to compare the aspect ratio in this section. Well, then, you need to predict whether Europe and NATO will save the Baltic states or limit themselves to regular sanctions.
              2. Seraphimamur
                Seraphimamur 5 February 2016 04: 24
                0
                And where will these armored wedges break through?
            3. Remy_Argo
              Remy_Argo 6 February 2016 19: 35
              0
              before!
              MLRS Smerch lesion area of ​​672 square meters. km
              area of ​​Lithuania 65 300 sq. km
              the deployment of their troops will take a maximum of 3000 square meters. km
              5 volleys MLRS Smerch / Tornado in 5 minutes and the war is over
              laughing
    2. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 4 February 2016 16: 31
      38
      Such articles have been alarming me lately !.
      Remember the 41st .... "The armor is strong and our tanks are fast .."
      Maybe they’re checking, just? After all, we were draping up to Moscow ... We must be on guard men! Tactics, something is changing, there is clearly a survey and data collection ..
      I will not say anything! hi
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 4 February 2016 16: 55
        11
        Quote: MIKHAN
        I will not say anything!

        "Is that you?" (from) laughing
    3. Pirogov
      Pirogov 4 February 2016 16: 32
      17
      The article is not the accuracy apparently in the beginning was 3 hours.
      1. lukke
        lukke 4 February 2016 16: 54
        +3
        the Russian army in three days will defeat the NATO contingent in the Baltic
        yeah and then
        (RF Armed Forces): well, what, NATO comrades, have increased the grouping in the Baltic states?
        (NATO): they increased, sucked up all the resources from the six countries for the payment of our buildup in a year and brought in half of all their equipment, but they increased!
        (RF Armed Forces): so what are the forecasts now?
        (NATO): now four!)
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 4 February 2016 17: 57
          11
          Quote: lukke
          increased, exhausted over the year all the resources from the six countries to pay for our increase and brought half of all their equipment, but increased!

          ... and placed in the places that we built back in the USSR, for example Adazi, etc. .. and everything was shot with a topographic accuracy of 1 meter ... that is, targets with previously known coordinates .. they don’t even have time to go to the areas of dispersal ... yes, and these areas have been known since the time of the Union .. laughing .
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. skullcap
        skullcap 4 February 2016 16: 55
        +1
        Quote: Pirogov
        The article is not the accuracy apparently in the beginning was 3 hours.

        And with the "Russian Army" too much.
        I am afraid that some kind of tanker-company will get tired of hearing such cries and he, in order to stop them, will drive into this Baltics somehow out of boredom.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. Altona
        Altona 4 February 2016 17: 21
        +3
        Quote: Pirogov
        The article is not the accuracy apparently in the beginning was 3 hours.

        --------------------
        I also thought what to do there for three days? But in general, NATO has the occupying forces there, to suppress the people in the Eastern European limitrophes themselves, and the same exercises are held. Landing on the coast, where the vaunted Humvee immediately got stuck in the belly, was a flashy attack on the coast. Since the operation of Overlord in 1944, the quality of airborne landing assaults has not improved a bit ...
    4. Kasym
      Kasym 4 February 2016 16: 52
      30
      The area of ​​the Baltic countries is very small. Lithuania and Latvia at 60 t. km, and Estonia 45t. km .. Some MLRS shot at once half the country. There are almost no rear lines and are pressed to the sea. Therefore, any breakthrough to the sea promises a dissection of the country and no maneuver for the reserve. There, even roll up the entire defense in reinforced concrete and that will not help. And even if a triple strike: marines from the sea, a landing and a strike from the front, it is better to immediately do the legs. I think the bill will go for hours, not for days. The Baltic armed forces will have to fight directly in their garrisons, not having time to turn around. Well, for an airplane 200-300km - 20-30min. for transport workers and such an unexpected person in the form of airborne forces at key points in any of 3 countries. Marines with naval support can occupy coastal points and ports. It turns out three days, if only they would defend themselves, as in the Brest Fortress - which is unlikely. NATO Air Force will not be able to lift into the region - the whole Baltic States has grown. the territory is shot through through the S-400, and if you still tighten the ships, then the S-300 will be enough. Will have to fight only with what is in place. And how many tank units and at least barrel artillery are there - piece targets ?! hi
      1. Persistent
        Persistent 4 February 2016 17: 39
        +5
        it’s better to immediately do the legs.

        In this situation, and nowhere to run !!!! laughing
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 4 February 2016 18: 02
          +6
          Quote: Persistent
          In this situation, and nowhere to run !!!!

          ... feed the prisoners of war prisoners again ... laughing
          1. kush62
            kush62 4 February 2016 19: 25
            0
            Inok10 (4) Today, 18:02 PM ↑ New
            ... feed the prisoners of war prisoners again ...

            Maybe better when trying to escape .....
      2. Foxmara
        Foxmara 4 February 2016 18: 17
        +2
        Tanks were thrown there by Europe, the Yankees, it seems, too, but later decided to replace them with BMPs. Well, three of our tanks from the USSR remained. But there seems to be MLRS, as well as mortars, artillery .. True, at the parade I was not impressed by their "powerful artillery on powerful Mercedes trucks", but there was some.
        1. Persistent
          Persistent 4 February 2016 20: 48
          +1
          three of their tanks from the USSR left.

          And in which of them are "Three Poles Georgians and a Sabak" sitting ???? laughing
      3. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 4 February 2016 22: 46
        +1
        Three days or longer, only because of the length of the territory, moreover, swampy, saturated with natural obstacles, completely unsuitable for tank battles. And if there is armed resistance, then longer. At sea, you’ll have to face not with the Baltic minesweepers, but with the warships of NATO countries, which will also slow down the progress. All the same, one needs to look at the world more realistically. hi
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 5 February 2016 00: 28
          +2
          Quote: sharp-lad
          Three days or longer, only because of the length of the territory, moreover, swampy, saturated with natural obstacles, completely unsuitable for tank battles. And if there is armed resistance, then longer. At sea, you’ll have to face not with the Baltic minesweepers, but with the warships of NATO countries, which will also slow down the progress. All the same, one needs to look at the world more realistically.

          ... Molodets, enter the regiment Pie, aunt Nuland ... laughing ... we know this theater by heart from the time of Peter I ... Courland .. the same places are reserved for me ... laughing
        2. Foxmara
          Foxmara 5 February 2016 17: 29
          0
          Quote: sharp-lad
          only because of the extent of the territory,

          500 km border. We have a distance from Krasnoyarsk to Abakan 400. Who are you going to scare?
          Quote: sharp-lad
          swampy, saturated with natural obstacles

          Does someone need your swamps ?? Or do they play a strategically important role? What roads after the collapse of the union have already been destroyed?
          Quote: sharp-lad
          And if there is armed resistance,

          Not understood? Young people working in Europe wash toilets. Who will resist there? And if you try to mobilize what is - firstly, half does not speak the national languages, but only the mighty, and how to carry out the commands? secondly, it is not a fact that he will not turn weapons together with the "conquerors" against the current occupiers. Yes, you can hang a gay man on the gate in the first city and the process of pouring out of the bugger will go faster.
          Quote: sharp-lad
          with warships of NATO countries

          Is this the kind of NATO in which everyone hides and scares each other for Russian aggression? Yes, is that NATO that is not able to resist 2 million refugees?
          Quote: sharp-lad
          All the same, one needs to look at the world more realistically.

          Well, yes, I guess. In reality, we do not need either Europe or the Baltic states. You can just smash the runway, drown the fleet (we have enough RCC), cut off the cable in the Atlantic, turn off the satellites and in the absence of the leading role of the United States, Europe will finally remember that it also has national interests. soldier
    5. Persistent
      Persistent 4 February 2016 16: 55
      11
      Sorry hi fresh news !!!

      MOSCOW, February 3. / TASS /. Russian Public Initiative has posted a proposal to rename the 7th Rostov lane in Moscow to the lane of pilot Oleg Peshkov, shot down by the Turkish Air Force in the skies over Syria in November. The head of the League for Assistance to Defense Enterprises (LSOP), State Duma deputy Vladimir Gutenev told the journalists about this. "On the Internet site" Russian Public Initiative "published a proposal of the League for Assistance to Defense Enterprises to rename the 7th Rostov lane in Moscow, on which the Embassy of the Turkish Republic is located, in the Lane of Pilot Peshkov," Gutenev informed.

      More on TASS:
      http://tass.ru/obschestvo/2634793

      Another splinter of the Turks !!! Each time you write the address of your embassy, ​​you will have to remember our dead guy !!! Min Defense promised to establish a bust of the Hero on the renamed street.
      1. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 4 February 2016 18: 38
        +1
        The surname "Peshkov" for the Turks may not say anything, but if the street was called "Constantinople", then the Turks would have had a more serious jittery.
        1. Persistent
          Persistent 4 February 2016 20: 51
          0
          The surname "Peshkov" for the Turks may not say anything,

          Turks are naive as small children. An inquiring childish mind gets to the bottom !!!! laughing
        2. TURAR
          TURAR 5 February 2016 09: 46
          0
          And this is not for the "Turks" that we would not forget.
      2. Idiot
        Idiot 4 February 2016 21: 09
        0
        A bust should be set in front of the Turkish embassy.
      3. Idiot
        Idiot 4 February 2016 21: 09
        0
        A bust should be set in front of the Turkish embassy.
    6. Oleg Lavrov
      Oleg Lavrov 4 February 2016 16: 57
      +3
      Exactly! )) In addition, the war with the Russian Federation will be a completely unknown fact for NATO! Since NATO will no longer be able to fire with impunity from a distance safe for itself! And the fact that "shameless" Russians will get them everywhere, who will not want to die in batches, but will give specific people in response, will be a bolt from the blue for NATO, with a huge number of coffins covered with "stars and stripes"!
      1. Sid.74
        Sid.74 4 February 2016 17: 48
        10
        I can't understand one thing .... why do we need to seize the Baltic States? Why do we so diligently impose this seizure?
        Crimea is one thing, and the Baltic is completely different ..request What to us from this proc ... what And without capture, in 50 years the population of the Baltic will be zero people.
        In the words of the Pentagon and ko, this means - take God, that we are not worthless.

        And everything from which ... Eurosolidarity is breathing its last ... ... The EU and NATO have gotten to play in wars ... which is not even able to restrain migrants ... and now the expenditures on NATO are justified by such nonsense ... ugh. negative
        1. KSLip
          KSLip 4 February 2016 18: 16
          +4
          Quote: Sid.74
          I just can’t understand one thing .... why do we need to capture the Baltics? Why are we so hard to impose this capture. Crimea is one thing, and the Baltic States is completely different.

          in-in. female dogs "put to sleep". then another question arises: while our tankers are washing trucks in the Baltic, what will the "Young Europeans" do? and there is an impression that they will cover the Kaliningrad region. so deliciously, on a grand scale. here one colleague wrote about the small size of the Baltic regions ... and the Kaliningrad region is much larger? guys, nafig these sprats are not needed. let’s go further in the geyrops, the shocks are washed in turn with the kakla. feed them later.
          1. Sid.74
            Sid.74 4 February 2016 18: 42
            +2
            Quote: KSLip
            Here another question arises: while our tankers are washing trucks in the Baltic, what will the "Young Europeans" do?

            Well, Poland presented a plan to evacuate its General Staff to London that year. winked
            1. KSLip
              KSLip 4 February 2016 19: 07
              +1
              Quote: Sid.74
              Well, Poland back in that year presented a plan to evacuate its General Staff to London

              Quote: KSLip
              ... female dogs "put to sleep". t
            2. Wheel
              Wheel 4 February 2016 20: 06
              +2
              Quote: Sid.74
              Well, Poland presented a plan to evacuate its General Staff to London that year.

              The Pshek leadership in London is not used to running. laughing
            3. Foxmara
              Foxmara 5 February 2016 17: 33
              0
              They don’t get used to actually) Go from the last time everyone remembers. Where is what, how to behave in the presence of the owner.
    7. sub307
      sub307 4 February 2016 17: 22
      +2
      The whole point of these defeatist "opuses" is to squeeze out money for defense as a whole .... Big money is "at stake" .... And they (especially those interested in military orders) actually "fig" what is the "simulation" pokazat - three days ... one day. Simply - a good opportunity to "make good money", the main thing is a "well-founded" opportunity.
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. Vadim237
      Vadim237 4 February 2016 18: 21
      0
      To capture all the military installations in the Baltics, our and one night is enough - the Afghan style of flight - from such a surprise there will not be any opposition there.
    10. Juborg
      Juborg 4 February 2016 19: 05
      0
      And what is so much? A year ago, they gave 12 HOURS OR THAT WEAPONS AND TECHNIQUE WHICH THEY HAVE ASSIGNED TO THE BALTS, INCREASED THE TIME OF THE BURST? Doubtful.
    11. Aleks76
      Aleks76 4 February 2016 21: 25
      0
      Two days customs will pass wink
    12. marlin1203
      marlin1203 4 February 2016 23: 17
      0
      Well, yes, in the Finnish war, with the same playful enthusiasm about the Mannerheim line, the forehead was also broken ... well, this experience in the Second World War helped out.
    13. Scraptor
      Scraptor 5 February 2016 09: 08
      0
      Khokhokh not khokhok, but only in the near-aboluses of 750 batrics, mostly with birds

      therefore, reckon with a margin for a couple of weeks leisurely and do not be shy with ...
  2. venaya
    venaya 4 February 2016 16: 24
    +3
    It is important to crow, there, though, do not bloom further. It is important that the necessary "people" get the money, and again they are pleased to spit on Russia.
    1. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm 4 February 2016 16: 26
      +5
      Congress, come on. Ten more yards!
      And you, dear Baltic states, make fun of having at least a month extended in the event of an attack by Russian barbarians!
  3. Temer
    Temer 4 February 2016 16: 24
    +2
    The Georgian army was rolled out in three days (or in a week?). And then do not understand that ...
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 4 February 2016 16: 27
      +8
      Georgians, too, are still warriors, but Medved helped them with their ridiculous orders ...
      1. KBR109
        KBR109 4 February 2016 16: 47
        +2
        Self-removal from the post of the Supreme ... for up to half a day. Zam had to grab the rule from distant Beijing.
    2. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 4 February 2016 16: 43
      27
      Then, at 9 o’clock they searched for Toldyan Serdyukov, he was out of the zone, then the day they seized the heroic NSh MO Makarov to lead the operation, but it refused, citing that for 3 months it hadn’t accepted the case. The bear called his dad in Beijing and complained about fate. Only when Baluevsky was found in his pajamas in the country, the thing went, without taking off his pajamas, he piled in 2 days to rodents that they took the horseradish to tiflis! am
  4. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 4 February 2016 16: 24
    +1
    “The conclusions turned out to be the following: Russian troops will defeat the NATO forces in the Baltic states in no more than three days.
    The servicemen of NATO countries, including the Baltic countries, using the support of American aviation, were unable to stop the advance of the mechanized units of the RF Armed Forces and suffered heavy losses. The United States and other NATO representatives in the Baltic states do not have enough soldiers and equipment to counter the Russian forces. "

    It seems to me that they did not take into account the mass surrender of the Baltic states. Everything can end much earlier.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 4 February 2016 16: 29
      +5
      Quote: lysyj bob

      It seems to me that they did not take into account the mass surrender of the Baltic states. Everything can end much earlier.

      Just three days, it would be necessary, not in a hurry, to drive the entire Baltic states on a tank to Kaliningrad. Here from here and the calculation of the term.
    2. Dam
      Dam 4 February 2016 17: 29
      +2
      Three days to deploy surrendered NATO troops?
    3. benjerro
      benjerro 4 February 2016 17: 51
      +1
      Or vice versa drag out.
      These "natopithecus" need to be sorted, washed, fed, put in transport and sent somewhere to await their further fate.
      1. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 4 February 2016 18: 42
        +1
        And why is this? Drive everyone into the Baltic Sea. Cross into Orthodoxy, with which their ancestors were and let them live at home. And whoever doesn’t want to let them sail to Europe, there is now free refugees. Moreover, white will be more welcome than black.
  5. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 4 February 2016 16: 24
    +6
    We recently "sunk" the NATO Mistrals of nuclear weapons.
    But here, apparently, they "regretted" spending money on the Balts.
    1. lysyj bob
      lysyj bob 4 February 2016 16: 26
      +1
      Quote: MainBeam
      regretted spending money on the Balts.


      Not worth powder and shot
  6. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 4 February 2016 16: 25
    +2
    It is clear that this is a pretext for building up our group of forces, and in the future it is possible to use the Baltic states as a bridgehead for an attack on Russia.
  7. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 4 February 2016 16: 25
    +2
    I would have looked in real life. I think it will end much, much faster than the Americans can imagine in the worst dream;)
    1. mad
      mad 4 February 2016 17: 26
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      I would have looked in real life.

      No, no ... better in theory! hi
  8. skrabplus.ru
    skrabplus.ru 4 February 2016 16: 25
    +8
    They definitely want to bring up troops to the Russian border. Anyway, this decision was made a long time ago, the reason was also found long ago (aggression, including in the Ukraine), but the peace-loving Gay Europeans (except, of course, the militant Baltic states) do not want to heat up the situation, for this the Yankees conducted a "simulation" for military equipment)
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 4 February 2016 22: 53
      0
      Let them tighten! They don’t remember about Kursk! Pulling a large amount of heavy equipment to the forefront is an offer to the enemy on an artillery holiday!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  9. ava09
    ava09 4 February 2016 16: 25
    +4
    (C) The American Research Center, together with the Pentagon, concluded that the Russian army would defeat the NATO contingent in the Baltic in three days (C)

    Now the Pentagon is ready to increase its budget, and the NATO occupiers in the Baltics are ready for a replenishment meeting ...
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 4 February 2016 16: 34
      +1
      The material also says that the NATO countries could counterattack Russian forces “advancing across the Baltic territory”, but “this would entail the involvement of the RF armed forces in the conflict zone”.
      So they will not counterattack. If they didn’t do it in a war game. Now we will know how many troops to keep there. THANK.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. sir_obs
    sir_obs 4 February 2016 16: 25
    +3
    This is if they start on Friday. Well, there is a weekend so far, and so on Monday, if you wake up early.
    1. 2С5
      2С5 4 February 2016 17: 30
      +2
      ... well, it’s unlikely! If they start on Friday morning, then by the evening they must finish everything — a short day + weekend ahead ... beer, fishing, then-sho, 5-10 recourse
  12. dvina71
    dvina71 4 February 2016 16: 26
    +3
    Balts .. dreaming .. No, really surrendered am, so surrendered. Enjoy it.
    And yes .. 3 days? Someone flatter themselves.
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 4 February 2016 16: 57
      +1
      Quote: dvina71
      Balts .. dreaming .. No, really surrendered am, so surrendered. Enjoy it.
      And yes .. 3 days? Someone flatter themselves.

      Well yes. Why defeat several tens of thousands of well-armed and motivated, heavy infantry. I remember the Finns, too, in three days they were going to defeat.
      1. Dazdranagon
        Dazdranagon 4 February 2016 17: 07
        +3
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        heavy infantry

        - these or what? laughing
      2. Terner38
        Terner38 4 February 2016 17: 11
        +1
        What motivated infantry or by whom?
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 4 February 2016 23: 04
          0
          The land of their ancestors, a very strong motivation. Or do you think that only Russian people can stand up for the defense of the Motherland?
          1. Dazdranagon
            Dazdranagon 5 February 2016 09: 04
            0
            Quote: sharp-lad
            The land of their ancestors, a very strong motivation. Or do you think that only Russian people can stand up for the defense of the Motherland?
            - for example, the Germans have already shown how ready they are to defend themselves from refugees - their women are raped, and men in protest put on skirts and walk around the city ... laughing
          2. GRIG
            GRIG 5 February 2016 09: 37
            0
            Quote: sharp-lad
            The land of their ancestors, a very strong motivation.

            Something this "motivation" did not work when they gave the "land of their ancestors" for the occupying foreign military bases.
      3. nemec55
        nemec55 4 February 2016 17: 14
        +2
        Well yes. Why defeat several tens of thousands of well-armed and motivated, heavy infantry. I remember the Finns, too, in three days they were going to defeat.

        Unfortunately, many do not understand what they write, as Putin said, they enjoy the war from the TV screens while drinking beer (not verbatim) But after all, someone should die if something happens ..
      4. 2С5
        2С5 4 February 2016 17: 38
        +2
        ... backfill question: What place are they motivated for? The Yankees will definitely not send their fighters into battle (it’s not their topic, the habit of raking in heat with other hands is indestructible), and the Baltic states, as it were, didn’t arm them well firstly not patriots (unlike the Russians), but bastards screaming ... secondly to brains with hands must also be attached to these very weapons, and how the aeroinstructors train them for big money is known to the whole world ... for example, remember how they trained the anti-igilov unit and what came of it ... but about the Finns, you are in vain, dear. In those days, they themselves cut for their own without any NATO and the EU, and this is a big deal ... so ... as they say, feel the difference hi
        1. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 4 February 2016 23: 13
          -1
          The Yankes themselves learned from the Latvian soldiers some of the techniques and tactical tricks applicable in the conditions of Latvia. This time the Latvians will fight for their own, though with the hope of NATO help. Many of them, speaking about the "occupation", remember the annexation and know what is the hidden difference.
          1. GRIG
            GRIG 5 February 2016 09: 48
            0
            Quote: sharp-lad
            The Jankeses themselves learned from the Latvian soldiers some techniques and tactical tricks applicable in the conditions of Latvia.

            Oh how)
            Those. some incomprehensible pride in the possession of certain "exclusive" and "secret" tactical tricks (tell this to our "Iskander" and "calibers"))), you are more than replaced by the thought that your country was simply raped and the "land is used" your ancestors "for their own purposes, exposing it to her?

            And do you really think that Russia needs your territory, and that in general there is a desire to fight with someone?
      5. NEXUS
        NEXUS 4 February 2016 17: 50
        +5
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Well yes. Why defeat several tens of thousands of well-armed and motivated, heavy infantry. I remember the Finns, too, in three days they were going to defeat.

        There was a line of Mozheno to the Finnish, and swamps and forests that were not passable for tanks. In addition, there were no multiple launch rocket complexes, no BF with Caliber, nor strategic and tactical aircraft.
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Why defeat several tens of thousands of well-armed and motivated, heavy infantry.

        So the Georgians were equipped and trained quite well ... and where did this heavy infantry end up with its motivation? Remind me how many NATO equipment was thrown when this "Georgian choir" burst into Tbilisi?
        1. Wheel
          Wheel 4 February 2016 18: 05
          +3
          Quote: NEXUS
          There was a line in Finnish,

          Maginot Line was in France.
          In Finland "Mannerheim Line"
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 4 February 2016 18: 06
            +3
            Quote: Wheel
            In Finland "Mannerheim Line"

            Sorry, right ... confused ... it happens. But the essence is hopefully clear. Thank you for the amendment. hi
        2. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 4 February 2016 23: 16
          -1
          There is no need to compare tough Latvians with such "fickle" Georgians. Read the history of the revolution and the USSR.
          1. Dazdranagon
            Dazdranagon 5 February 2016 09: 05
            0
            Quote: sharp-lad
            No need to compare tough Latvians with such "fickle" Georgians
            - Damn, you’re a walking joke generator today ... laughing
      6. Wheel
        Wheel 4 February 2016 17: 52
        +1
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Well yes. What is there to defeat several tens of thousands ...

        A few tens of thousands?
        Do not specify how much specifically?
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        well armed

        Well, say, well, well ... lol
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        and motivated

        uh ... well, oh well, let's write off the nationalist fervor ... until the first ... lulina
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        heavy infantry.

        Heavy on the rise?
        Yes, Estonians are power! Until it comes ... laughing
      7. dvina71
        dvina71 4 February 2016 19: 25
        0
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Well yes. Why defeat several tens of thousands of well-armed and motivated, heavy infantry.

        Must they be smashed? Is this modern military science in Israel?
      8. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 4 February 2016 23: 02
        0
        Not badly armed infantry entrenched in their land. And to be honest, there will not be any mass grave-trenches, as well as a clear front line, those days have passed. Even to capture a relatively small Baltic region, you will have to make a lot of effort and spend a lot of resources. But with the exception of the "exceptional" and a few especially "gifted" local wars with Russia, no one wants, which does not exclude resistance with arms.
  13. tsvetkov1274
    tsvetkov1274 4 February 2016 16: 27
    0
    So jump from the windows fellow
  14. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 4 February 2016 16: 27
    +1
    You bring ukroheroev to the Baltic states, they have already stopped ten times laughing
    It's like, give as much money, let them break it, not for three, but for six. And then just as much ... yes
  15. raketnik
    raketnik 4 February 2016 16: 32
    +1
    NOOS ... the week’s work on 3 is a bit wrong there ... until everyone is picked out from the caches, while we’ll be sentenced, while everyone is outweighed NOOOO ... analyte add time ... we don’t need a head start
  16. beer-youk
    beer-youk 4 February 2016 16: 36
    +1
    Quote: lelikas
    Just three days, it would be necessary, not in a hurry, to drive the entire Baltic States by tank, to Kaliningrad


    Correct a little, with your permission. Passing the Baltic States for three days is possible only in the case of half-hour stops after each hour of movement, and, of course, with a night's rest. In addition, oncoming traffic from Kaliningrad was not taken into account.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 4 February 2016 17: 28
      +3
      How many kilometers has Syrian regular progressed
      army for 4 months offensive against irregular infantry (militants), not
      having neither aviation nor armored vehicles (almost)? smile
      1. kil 31
        kil 31 4 February 2016 18: 07
        +1
        Quote: voyaka uh
        How many kilometers has Syrian regular progressed
        army for 4 months offensive against irregular infantry (militants), not
        having neither aviation nor armored vehicles (almost)? smile

        Cool comparison of CA with RA. CA also does not have armored vehicles (almost) It ran out of steam during the war years. If you fight for several years with your neighbors (without respite) and you have only Jerusalem left, you’ll advance to the fig if the US can only help bomb your neighbors. A warrior needs to be criticized.
      2. dvina71
        dvina71 4 February 2016 19: 24
        +1
        Quote: voyaka uh
        not
        having neither aviation nor armored vehicles

        Moved .. Even more likely not so. There was nowhere to move. There were local centers of resistance of the SAA and the same local centers of pressure of the Islamists, very mobile and externally fed.
        We have it now. The point is still toward the formation of a continuous front, which will not allow mobile groups on carts to smash the rear of the SAA. A group of jihadists are squeezing out in Damascus. The border with Turkey is in Latakia, technically under the control of the SAA and the Kurds.
        In general, everything is going to eliminate the internal foci of resistance of jihadists, which will release significant forces of the SAA .. in fact, then only the desert will remain ..
        NUI about igil armored vehicles .. there are many. This is a well-known fact.
      3. Victor-M
        Victor-M 4 February 2016 22: 23
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        How many kilometers has Syrian regular progressed
        army for 4 months offensive against irregular infantry (militants), not
        having neither aviation nor armored vehicles (almost)? smile

        And where did you get the idea that they (American, Guantan PMCs, Islamic spill) do not have armored vehicles and aircraft, they have everything, only they are afraid to use them, although some, the most "courageous" such as the USA and Saudi callolitia, are used in remote areas where there are no air defense and missile defense systems.
    2. 2С5
      2С5 4 February 2016 17: 42
      0
      ... well, the Baltic states in itself stimulate to sluggishness and smoothness in movements and thoughts laughing ... and all this simulation and conclusions, whatever one may say, were, in my opinion, the Baltic states, judging by the clearly overestimated time frames lol
  17. Rom14
    Rom14 4 February 2016 16: 36
    +3
    Quote: Temer
    The Georgian army was rolled out in three days (or in a week?). And then do not understand that ...

    They rolled out the moment, it’s the staff with Medvedev who spent three days ...
  18. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 4 February 2016 16: 39
    +2
    The eastern part of Europe is specially trolled to deploy NATO troops closer to our borders and to justify missile defense.
    1. cap
      cap 4 February 2016 17: 01
      +1
      Quote: Siberia 9444
      The eastern part of Europe is specially trolled to deploy NATO troops closer to our borders and to justify missile defense.


      They accustom to the idea that Russia’s first goal is Europe (and the most non-heroic part of it). A false setup and a false goal. Self-respecting countries will simply be asked for answers like that. These mongrels about whom the conversation has been constantly talking lately will simply be silent .
      Since they were pawns and will remain.
      Scared mattresses new military doctrine of Russia? Of course yes.
      Putin's decisiveness to use new weapons in a local conflict makes one think that Putin will not hesitate to use nuclear weapons against the states. Therefore, there is a probe of sentiment and under the guise of reducing flight time to missile deployment centers and air defense lines. As for the money allegedly needed by NATO, this is ordinary yap. All European defense has long been supported by the American budget. There is an economic and psychological war "to starve." From here Ukraine, Syria will soon have to wait for Afghanistan and Central Asia.
      Something like that hi
  19. max2215
    max2215 4 February 2016 16: 40
    +4
    But these strategists did not raise the question, but why the hell do we need it? That already were our grandfathers and great-grandfathers and great-great ..., it is clear that there is nothing there that we need. But we need to, so that they would not come to us either with advice or with decrees on how to live. And so to put our guys for the sake of corrupt Balts, well, we do not need. To give the teeth without entering the territory of the adversary, there are enough technical means to be imprinted at the genetic level. It can be seen, our ancestors, for a very long time and on wallowing, are still afraid, but what no one remembers)))
    1. 2С5
      2С5 4 February 2016 17: 44
      0
      ... well it must be like that! All the strategies, "research of British scientists" and other heresy at the state level are made with the sole purpose of extinguishing the babos ... what's not clear? recourse
  20. potalevl
    potalevl 4 February 2016 16: 41
    0
    Do they have that spring exacerbation of the brain after a groundhog day or a heavy outcast after the New Year holidays?
  21. PBF
    PBF 4 February 2016 16: 41
    0
    The United States and other NATO representatives in the Baltic countries do not have enough soldiers and equipment that would be enough to confront Russian troops.


    If you collect all the equipment that can resist, and not a "large" number of soldiers, then the peaceful ones will have to be taken out from the Baltic states, there will be no room left.
  22. vair
    vair 4 February 2016 16: 41
    +1
    Quote: venaya
    It is important to crow, there, though, do not bloom further. It is important that the necessary "people" get the money, and again they are pleased to spit on Russia.

    That's it! Old songs about the main thing - grandmother come on! And then we will not fight against the Russian hordes.
  23. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 4 February 2016 16: 41
    +1
    the Russian army in three days will defeat the NATO contingent in the Baltic

    It depends on what they will smash
  24. Vital
    Vital 4 February 2016 16: 41
    +1
    And where is such confidence that NATO simply will not throw the Baltic states?
  25. Stinger
    Stinger 4 February 2016 16: 42
    0
    What's this! And if they beat through Alaska, then three hours is enough. For one, and the unfortunate Aleuts will be freed from democratic military idiocy. Glory to NATO!
  26. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 4 February 2016 16: 42
    +1
    All this crap in order to justify money injections into the defense industry, that is, in NATO, otherwise the USA has a large public debt. Let the Baltic states give most of their money to NATO.
  27. Mixweb
    Mixweb 4 February 2016 16: 43
    +1
    NATO members have an incredibly high opinion of themselves. 3 days. Unless our troops will walk on foot.
  28. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 4 February 2016 16: 44
    +2
    Well, men, well, a circus, big top. As soon as their press, then turn off the lights, horror movies. The Russian army in two days didn’t roll the whole nature into the asphalt, but somewhere deeply sank. Our planes are the coolest, the submarines are the most subtle, the air defense is the most surmountable, the tanks are the most armored, the soldiers are generally animals and there are no obstacles for them. And the USA is terribly lucky that they are on the island.
    Despite the fact that they always only belittled our capabilities. Yesterday we were either regionals or calling us no matter how.
    And such a nap lies in the middle of the road and paws lifted up, oh there is no strength to resist.
    I propose to get around and go my own way. It will fall away or resolve itself.
  29. raiart
    raiart 4 February 2016 16: 44
    +3
    NATO members have too high an opinion of themselves. As soon as it is clear that the Russian troops decided to return their territory, all this vaunted nata bullet will be in fear on the Spanish coast.
  30. Michael67
    Michael67 4 February 2016 16: 46
    +3
    Morons. Wrong conclusion. Less than a day is enough.
  31. AlexTires
    AlexTires 4 February 2016 16: 46
    +3
    A day after the start of the database, the Russian-speaking population of the Baltic countries will strangle the local army with their bare hands, at least that part of it that dares to fart towards Russia .... laughing
  32. Sergey Vladimirovich
    Sergey Vladimirovich 4 February 2016 16: 51
    0
    They are looking for a reason to increase the grouping of troops near the borders with Russia, they are frankly looking. At this pace, the whole Baltic region will turn into one solid US military base, and at the same time at the Baltic expense ... Differbs sing, of course, but it would be better if they were not there. No matter how songs these minds clouded over to some of our leaders ...
  33. Jarserge
    Jarserge 4 February 2016 16: 51
    +1
    I wonder how .... And why the Russian Federation Baltic? !! Again to contain these pompous Chukhontsev?
  34. Gloomy Hedgehog
    Gloomy Hedgehog 4 February 2016 16: 52
    0
    Three days - it can be assumed, of course, but in this case, the Russian military can have at most baseball bats and the day of the week - Saturday. Then get three days. )))
  35. 4ekist
    4ekist 4 February 2016 16: 54
    0
    In Latvia, a mobile plan can be frustrated. All to be mobilized went west to turn the plumbing nuts, while others were homo ......
  36. vetor
    vetor 4 February 2016 16: 55
    0
    The excitement around Russia is growing, then a nuclear strike on Sweden is an aggression towards the Baltic states. Prepare Allies for Preventive Strike?
  37. 1536
    1536 4 February 2016 16: 56
    0
    I think that with small garrisons Russian troops will not enter the battle. Forced march, first to Berlin, and then ... History has shown that after Hitler the United States took the baton of the struggle with Russia and its people. So what will happen next, let's see.
  38. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 4 February 2016 16: 58
    0
    Does anyone recall how many days we planned to get to Lisbon in the Cold War?
  39. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 4 February 2016 16: 59
    +1
    Along the way, they firmly decided that the Balts can be thrown into the meat grinder first ........ and it doesn't matter if the patient wants it or not. "Doctor" said - "To the morgue, then to the morgue"
    1. 2С5
      2С5 4 February 2016 17: 48
      0
      ... she died so she died))) And finally, Kaneshno is a script for Hollywood, the whales are used to turning everything into a show, the nature is such a dumb, hysterical, purely American request
  40. 31rus
    31rus 4 February 2016 17: 01
    +1
    Dear and what are you discussing nonsense, from NATO, this is a provocation, so it’s calmer
  41. old pioneer
    old pioneer 4 February 2016 17: 02
    0
    In my opinion, Americans flatter the Balts ...
  42. SADKO72
    SADKO72 4 February 2016 17: 07
    0
    And what, lure! Oh, what if!
  43. Sausuolis
    Sausuolis 4 February 2016 17: 08
    0
    There is no Lithuania in the script because in 3 days we will not be able to.
    1. 2С5
      2С5 4 February 2016 17: 52
      +1
      ... and nah you fell? You don't even need to be taken, Nats and ees will refuse you, where will you run for a crust of bread? Will cut through you that the Russians are brothers and you lived with them for 70 years in love and harmony, and those who were against this had already faded into Omerigu? B "you are two-handed as well as your sponsoring hosts ... adyu, defective! tongue

      dogs: learn to write in Russian correctly, it may come in handy ..
  44. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 4 February 2016 17: 10
    +1
    The conclusions were as follows: in no more than three days, Russian troops will defeat the NATO forces in the Baltic states.

    No matter how fair or flattering such conclusions of American strategists may seem to us, the whole danger of articles about such conclusions, as well as the very fact of research on this topic, lies in the fact that Western (and not so) ordinary people are dripping into their heads and settles there, becoming commonplace, the dogma about the inevitable collision of the West and Russia. Another couple of years of such enhanced drip therapy and the Balts will actually begin to build fortified areas on the borders with Russia. And the Central European states will support them in every possible way in this madness. And, what the hell is not joking, they will begin to form "volunteer battalions" from African refugees and send them to the eastern line (not yet a front).
    As a countermeasure, I consider it appropriate to publish similar studies of our General Staff, which will consider the scenario of the treacherous attack of NATO units on our peaceful cities from the territories of the Baltic states, followed by their immediate destruction by tactical nuclear weapons, the application of preventive nuclear weapons at industrial and military centers of NATO members, and reflection of the response blow our missile defense / air defense, and after the deactivation of the territory, the transformation thereof into reserves for growing bears. Maybe then cease to engage in x-her.
    1. 2С5
      2С5 4 February 2016 18: 01
      0
      As a countermeasure, I consider it appropriate to publish similar studies of our General Staff, which will consider the scenario of the treacherous attack of NATO units on our peaceful cities from the territories of the Baltic states, followed by their immediate destruction by tactical nuclear weapons, the application of preventive nuclear weapons at industrial and military centers of NATO members, and reflection of the response strike by our missile defense / air defense ...

      ... what's the point? The analysis of these studies to a simple man in the street (I mean imported) is unlikely to reach or will come in a distorted form beyond recognition, and if they have information "uncut" Duc about the successes of the Russian Army, so you know ... what for to be like minke whales and "British scientists "? I am sure that at the headquarters exercises, many options for attack and response are played out and calculated, and this information is not for widespread coverage ... we seem to be not one of the boastful wink
  45. sergo1914
    sergo1914 4 February 2016 17: 15
    0
    At such times, the SA went out to the English Channel.
  46. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 4 February 2016 17: 22
    0
    Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Why ??? where are our soldiers so long they will hang around-poured NATO troops goziki watered or what ???

    I think such an obvious conclusion is being published for the sake of increasing the military presence in the Baltic states by NATO forces and increasing the already not small defense spending ... Western propaganda is intensely and methodically preparing the population for a war with Russia ... The Air Force’s film about the capture of Sweden by Russia is another confirmation of this .. .
  47. Velizariy
    Velizariy 4 February 2016 17: 23
    0
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    Quote: dvina71
    Balts .. dreaming .. No, really surrendered am, so surrendered. Enjoy it.
    And yes .. 3 days? Someone flatter themselves.

    Well yes. Why defeat several tens of thousands of well-armed and motivated,heavy infantry.

    A pig will go, in a tight formation))) And who is there motivated then in the Baltic states ???
  48. mihasik
    mihasik 4 February 2016 17: 36
    0
    The American research center together with the Pentagon came to the conclusion that the Russian army in three days will crush the NATO contingent in the Baltic States

    So I say: Do not hell with them in the Baltic states! Get home over a large puddle while the wind is without stones! laughing
  49. Lelek
    Lelek 4 February 2016 17: 40
    0
    ("The military personnel of NATO countries, including the Baltic countries, using the support of American aviation, could not stop the advance of mechanized units of the RF Armed Forces and suffered heavy losses. The United States and other NATO representatives in the Baltic countries do not have enough soldiers and equipment to resist. Russian troops. "
    This conclusion is published on behalf of RAND Corporation representatives such as Michael Johnson and David Shlapak.)

    You, Western "seers", have been trying for so long and persistently to convince the whole world and us that we are insidious, aggressive and only think how to attack this peaceful and almost defenseless "Western world", and do it so "convincingly" that we will one day believe you and hit you in full. Advice to you: do not poke a stick into the bear den - it will remove the scalp along with the rest of the skin. yes
  50. Russia
    Russia 4 February 2016 17: 43
    0
    This is not the first such statement from Western experts, who, in all likelihood, stubbornly lead to NATO increasing its forces in the Baltic countries.

    A series:
    "In a black-black room, a black-black hand (of Russia) flies ... and is about to attack the little Baltic kids."
    Fear and arm yourself (buy from us / usa / weapons) Baltic kids!