The Armed Forces General Staff published a report on the events in the Debaltsevsky cauldron: "The Ukrainian army stopped the Russian Armed Forces, advancing on Kharkov"
The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine published a report on how, according to the version of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, events developed near the village of Debaltseve. At the same time in the General Staff and today the events of January-February 2015 of the year are called events on the “Debaltsev bridgehead”. The report states that 136 of Ukrainian soldiers were killed on the “bridgehead”, 331 was injured, 7 was captured, 18 went missing.
The material of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine states that in the area of the settlement of Debaltseve, up to 30% of military equipment belonging to the Armed Forces of Ukraine was destroyed or incapacitated.
Not without a statement that the Ukrainian army opposed the "armed forces of the Russian Federation." The material of the Ukrainian General Staff states that “Russian-terrorist troops” (a term written by the Maidan “experts”) planned after the fighting near the city of Debaltseve to break through to Artyomovsk, and then, no less, to take Kharkov. “Take Kharkov”, as it turns out, was hampered by two factors: “the persistent defense of the fighters of the Ukrainian army” and “depletion of the enemy’s forces”. This statement alone makes it possible to perceive the report of Mr. Muzhenko’s department as a fantastic piece of literature from the category of works of an absurdist writer.
In general, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine assigned the blame for the retreat from the “Debaltsevskiy bridgehead” to the very fighters who “steadfastly defended”. The article says that a number of Ukrainian units "untimely reacted to the movement of the enemy." Named and specific units that disrupted the operation of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the "complete and unconditional peremog."
Of material:
So who was more "exhausted": the Ukrainian army or the enemy? ..
As an intermediate output GSU VSU:
In general, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine actions of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine itself on the "withdrawal of a large number of troops" were recognized as successful. Who would doubt that...
The material of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine states that in the area of the settlement of Debaltseve, up to 30% of military equipment belonging to the Armed Forces of Ukraine was destroyed or incapacitated.
Not without a statement that the Ukrainian army opposed the "armed forces of the Russian Federation." The material of the Ukrainian General Staff states that “Russian-terrorist troops” (a term written by the Maidan “experts”) planned after the fighting near the city of Debaltseve to break through to Artyomovsk, and then, no less, to take Kharkov. “Take Kharkov”, as it turns out, was hampered by two factors: “the persistent defense of the fighters of the Ukrainian army” and “depletion of the enemy’s forces”. This statement alone makes it possible to perceive the report of Mr. Muzhenko’s department as a fantastic piece of literature from the category of works of an absurdist writer.
In general, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine assigned the blame for the retreat from the “Debaltsevskiy bridgehead” to the very fighters who “steadfastly defended”. The article says that a number of Ukrainian units "untimely reacted to the movement of the enemy." Named and specific units that disrupted the operation of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the "complete and unconditional peremog."
Of material:
At a time when the enemy had concentrated the maximum amount of forces and means in the Debaltseve area, the 57-th separate motorized infantry brigade was assigned the task of conducting assault actions and taking Gorlovka. But the team has not budged.
The personnel of the combined detachment of the 3-th and 8-th separate special forces regiments, which were supposed to ensure the withdrawal of units from the Debaltsevo area, as a result of physical and moral exhaustion refused to perform the tasks, independently changing them and leaving without orders to safe areas.
The personnel of the combined detachment of the 3-th and 8-th separate special forces regiments, which were supposed to ensure the withdrawal of units from the Debaltsevo area, as a result of physical and moral exhaustion refused to perform the tasks, independently changing them and leaving without orders to safe areas.
So who was more "exhausted": the Ukrainian army or the enemy? ..
As an intermediate output GSU VSU:
When it became clear that it was impossible to keep Debaltseve, it was decided to move the units to safe areas. During the Debaltsev operation, for the first time a large number of troops were withdrawn from enemy attacks.
In general, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine actions of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine itself on the "withdrawal of a large number of troops" were recognized as successful. Who would doubt that...
Information