Military Review

Stoltenberg: Russia simulates nuclear strikes at NATO countries, incl. in Sweden

109
Over the last 3 of the year, Russia conducted 18 major exercises, which included modeling of nuclear strikes at NATO countries, the Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said in his report.




“As part of its overall military build-up, the scale of Russia's military maneuvers and exercises has reached a level unprecedented since the days of the Cold War. Over the past three years, Russia has conducted at least 18 large-scale exercises, some of which were attended by more than 100 thousand soldiers. These exercises also include simulations of nuclear strikes against NATO and its partners (for example, nuclear attacks on Sweden were simulated in March 2013), and (exercises) were used to disguise mass movements of military forces (for example, in February 2014 before illegal annexation of the Crimea) ",
newspaper quotes the report Look.

Stoltenberg called “the military base in Småland and the building of the intelligence service near Stockholm” as educational targets for Russians.

Earlier, a source in the Swedish military told one of the local publications that "March 29 2013 in 30 kilometers from the Swedish border flew two Tu-22М3 and four Su-27, which allegedly launched a training attack on objects in Sweden." He also said that "the duty link of the Swedish Air Force fighters did not have time to rise into the air."

Now this unsubstantiated "fact" was officially confirmed in the report of the NATO Secretary General.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. oldseaman1957
    oldseaman1957 4 February 2016 09: 29 New
    55
    "" Stoltenberg: RF simulates nuclear strikes against NATO countries, incl. on Sweden "" - "Wise" remark! Especially after the release of the declassified archives, where they constantly tried to arrange for us a nuclear armageddon since 1945. Glamorous hypocrites!
    1. cniza
      cniza 4 February 2016 09: 32 New
      33
      Well, does hysteria begin? They will howl on different topics and from all sides ... Syria, you see, Russia has robbed them ....
      1. Now we are free
        Now we are free 4 February 2016 09: 36 New
        24
        No, well, look how they want to set the Swedes on us ... Shilov ... the NATO members say that Sweden is not a member of this prostitute union under the control of a black pimp. I really hope for the Swedes' sanity and the fact that they will send NATO in the person of Stoltenberg with his wet dreams of a Russian nuclear strike against Sweden to one place. Sweden is also Sweden because it has always kept itself apart from the "European priestesses of love" earning at the same time without losing its face (like Switzerland).

        P.S. What will a respectable wealthy girl answer to an offer to voluntarily join the "Trade Union of Prostitutes"? .. I hope Sweden will answer the same way as a girl who is friendly with her own head would answer.
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 4 February 2016 09: 47 New
          38
          Quote: Now we are free
          I really hope for the sanity of the Swedes

          They show cartoons to children with talking genitals and talking poop and piss! Children are called "IT" until the gender was determined!

          What the hell is sanity! These are moral hoops!
          1. Wind_zl
            Wind_zl 4 February 2016 09: 48 New
            0
            And what they have to show, well, not Carlson on the roof? He, though charged to Gerring, is a pretty decent citizen.
            1. Diana Ilyina
              Diana Ilyina 4 February 2016 10: 18 New
              16
              Quote: Wind_ZL
              And what they have to show, well, not Carlson on the roof? He, though charged to Gerring, is a pretty decent citizen.


              What makes you think that Carlson is deducted from Gerring ?! In any case, even Gerring is better than talking excrement and genitals!

              As for the Swedish "friendship with the head", they quarreled with it for a long time, even before they started looking for our submarine in their skerries. Yes, and their memory apparently lost. They decided to remember the 18th century, when they, together with the Turks, tried to fight with Russia. True, the poor fellows have forgotten how it ended for them!
              1. Wind_zl
                Wind_zl 5 February 2016 11: 58 New
                +1
                The Swedish writer Astrid Lingred was a great friend and admirer of Hermann Herring, as well as National Socialism. His favorite words: - nonsense, everyday life, I’m a man in the prime of life, etc., and his main dream is a motor on his back to fly. DO NOT KNOW THIS - GO! As one Robindranath Tagore_- Shura said, you are tramp!
                1. VeterS
                  VeterS 5 February 2016 12: 08 New
                  +1
                  Yes, in general, this is not Punchinel's secret. A well-known fact from the biography of Lindgred and the prototypes of "Carlson who ...". It's a shame not to know. By the way, the Swedes for the most part are notorious National Socialists, like the Germans used to be. What the hell was Italian fascism dragged to them, God only knows !? Although ... it has long been noticed that education and education are far from the same thing.
          2. Truth
            Truth 4 February 2016 10: 10 New
            +5
            These exercises also include modeling nuclear attacks on NATO and its partners.

            But actually, what is wrong here?
            Well, simulate, while no one climbs to us - climb, so fucking on the simulated.
            And this ... you can promise lope that Russia will attack now, it’s time we ourselves have to admonish on this topic, well, at least organize some kind of provocation.
            Or are there no heroes in Europe, only one peep ... did you stay?
            1. Kent0001
              Kent0001 4 February 2016 10: 16 New
              +3
              It’s pinned that their fighters did not have time to fly into the air.
            2. Constructor1
              Constructor1 4 February 2016 10: 18 New
              +8
              in March 2013, nuclear attacks on Sweden were simulated),

              Why do we need a nuclear strike against Sweden? I do not understand. There are more priority goals .. for example, across the Atlantic and Arctic oceans soldier
              1. aleks 62 next
                aleks 62 next 4 February 2016 10: 55 New
                +1
                ..... Why do we need a nuclear strike against Sweden? ...

                ... Nickel is not enough .... There are rumored very large deposits ..... laughing . fool
                1. Constructor1
                  Constructor1 4 February 2016 12: 57 New
                  +2
                  Quote: aleks 62 next
                  ..Nickel is missing .... There are rumors of very large deposits ..

                  Radioactive, improved? laughing
              2. cap
                cap 4 February 2016 11: 21 New
                +9
                Quote: Designer 1
                in March 2013, nuclear attacks on Sweden were simulated),

                Why do we need a nuclear strike against Sweden? I do not understand. There are more priority goals .. for example, across the Atlantic and Arctic oceans soldier


                2 February 2016 02:43 | "Media: during the exercise, Britain did not dare to retaliate against Russia"
                I’ll leave the same comment. But the cries of the threat are simply tired.
                Who are they scared of besides themselves?
                "I read this news, hair on end!
                If this is a training plan, I want to ask which one ... wrote it.
                I’ll say it more simply. If the conversation is about the use of nuclear weapons, no one will probably ever knock on the clave and fill in coordinates, an iron trough at sea. The beginning of ANY operation on someone else’s theater of operations involves first of all putting the troops on alert. For nuclear weapons delivery means to areas of combat deployment, or transition to readiness No. 1 for mine-based missiles, the same for submarines located on the database. ON ALL! Target carriers are set up ADVANCE.
                Targets under the numbers. The number is dialed as "call a friend" and "goodbye gentlemen"! Helicopter carrier in Greenland with a crew within an hour, Britain in northern Canada. Washington DC on Easter Island. Then cartographers and dosimetrists work. The war is over.
                Something like this. I forgot who we attacked there. The Baltic seems.
                So her wave washed away !.
                For ....... from NATO. For 2016, the General Staff of Russia plans to hold 100! (one hundred) combat training deployments of the Strategic Missile Forces as part of combat training. This is open data, so that every third day of the year they will not forget to pray in the morning and enjoy the sun and peace in the world. Now all I wanted to say was "about the teachings." hi
            3. Vita vko
              Vita vko 4 February 2016 10: 44 New
              +4
              Quote: Truth
              actually what is wrong here?

              Stoltenberg deliberately distorts the phrase "modeling reciprocal nuclear strikes ", which, incidentally, is not surprising. Whipping up horror among politicians has long been the main method of squeezing out the military budget. Otherwise they are fixated on refugees, they want to remove sanctions from Russia, and they even dared to shoot true films on the Maidan. poor, unhappy Nulad has a pie in a lean year, and if the EU continues to do this, Stolnberg's American fairy tales will win Oscars for Best Script for Horror Films.
            4. Maxom75
              Maxom75 4 February 2016 11: 07 New
              +1
              interesting, but are they at the NATO headquarters simulating corn crops?)
            5. Aleksander
              Aleksander 4 February 2016 12: 09 New
              0
              Quote: Truth
              Well, simulate, while no one climbs to us - climb, so fucking on the simulated.

              And why did this Sweden surrender? The USA will be the first to "model" in nature, the rest of Sweden will simply crawl on their knees.
            6. Aleksander
              Aleksander 4 February 2016 12: 09 New
              0
              Quote: Truth
              Well, simulate, while no one climbs to us - climb, so fucking on the simulated.

              And why did this Sweden surrender? The USA will be the first to "model" in nature, the rest of Sweden will simply crawl on their knees.
            7. dorz
              dorz 4 February 2016 14: 20 New
              0
              It is a little reassuring that a simple simulation of a nuclear strike will probably help calm some hotheads in the West.
            8. Xapoh
              Xapoh 4 February 2016 15: 18 New
              0
              there is no pees ... ly, there 3,14 darasy will remain
        2. iConst
          iConst 4 February 2016 10: 25 New
          +1
          Quote: Now we are free
          I really hope for the common sense of the Swedes and that they will send NATO in the person of Stoltenberg with his wet dreams of a nuclear strike by the Russians on Sweden to one place. Sweden is also Sweden because it has always kept itself apart from the "European priestesses of love" earning at the same time without losing its face (like Switzerland).
          - And what does sanity have to do with it?

          Vaughn, several million French people protested against "parent 1" "parent 2" - so what? As it was not.

          Geyrop has already introduced supranational governance. With the conclusion of the agreement, TTIP of the state as institutions will wither away, since this agreement takes precedence over the internal laws of these countries.

          And about morality - the Scandinavians are just the leaders in the implementation of all kinds of rainbow crap.
        3. tilovaykrisa
          tilovaykrisa 4 February 2016 14: 36 New
          0
          Peter the first ruled the brains, however, they fell silent under the Nazis and lay down under NATO, so everything must be modeled correctly. Let’s remember that in the event of a mess, they will be the first to turn into a nuclear waste dump.
        4. NIKNN
          NIKNN 4 February 2016 22: 01 New
          +2
          Quote: Now we are free
          No, well, look how they want to set the Swedes on us ... Shilov ... the NATO members say that Sweden is not a member of this prostitute union under the control of a black pimp. I really hope for the Swedes' sanity and the fact that they will send NATO in the person of Stoltenberg with his wet dreams of a Russian nuclear strike against Sweden to one place. Sweden is also Sweden because it has always kept itself apart from the "European priestesses of love" earning at the same time without losing its face (like Switzerland).

          P.S. What will a respectable wealthy girl answer to an offer to voluntarily join the "Trade Union of Prostitutes"? .. I hope Sweden will answer the same way as a girl who is friendly with her own head would answer.


          So for whom, for whom we will not begin to deliver a nuclear strike so it is in Sweden:
          1 non member nato
          2 does not have its own nuclear weapons
          3 does not place someone else's territory
          What is the point? All the same, mushrooms or cocaine ... request
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 4 February 2016 09: 34 New
      +8
      Russia conducted 18 major exercises, which included modeling nuclear attacks on NATO countries

      Do we have to throw you sweets and buns or something?
      He also said that "the duty link of the Swedish Air Force fighters did not have time to fly into the air."

      Pilots diapers changed?
    3. Oberon812
      Oberon812 4 February 2016 09: 34 New
      10
      He also said that "the duty link of the Swedish Air Force fighters did not have time to fly into the air"

      Are we also to blame for this? request
      1. Ugrumiy
        Ugrumiy 4 February 2016 10: 03 New
        +3
        No, it’s just that the Swedes also conducted their studies, conditionally depicted the destruction at the airport, so they didn’t take off. yes
    4. Finches
      Finches 4 February 2016 09: 35 New
      14
      And what do we need to model in military exercises ??? How to surrender ??? Strange uncle, but on your teachings, what do you model there ... laughing
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 4 February 2016 09: 41 New
        +6
        Earlier, a source in the Swedish military department told one of the local publications that March 29, 2013 30 kilometers from the Swedish border flew two Tu-22M3 and four Su-27, who allegedly launched a training attack on objects in Sweden "

        We flew there and World War II, so what? fool
    5. trenitron
      trenitron 4 February 2016 09: 38 New
      +9
      Do not judge strictly, he has not yet recovered
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 4 February 2016 12: 44 New
        +2
        Quote: trenitron
        Do not judge strictly, he has not yet recovered

        This does not make it any easier for us. A patient on his head in such a position is already a risk to the whole world)))
        In general, these statements fall in order to implement the plan of inciting hatred in European society against Russia. That this is a false lie is secondary to them.
        The main goal - Society must be intimidated and ready to defend itself or accept mobilization as an option to get rid of fear. This simplifies the introduction of the American contingent into Sweden, the deployment of nuclear armaments there, which will be perceived by the population with "understanding and gratitude" and not with protests.
        And they do it massively, in a week:
        1. The film is about a corrupt and unpredictable Putin.
        2. A film which simulates the Russian attack on the Baltic States and NATO's involvement in "punishing the aggressor".
        3. A statement on the exercises with insidious plans to attack Sweden (which most recently caught a Russian submarine).
        At the same time, there is a buildup of NATO forces in the Baltic states ...
        Those. the population is morally prepared for a war with Russia, a formal occasion for the start of which can be any provocation.
        Seriously ...
    6. 79807420129
      79807420129 4 February 2016 09: 38 New
      16
      If this NATO dog wandered, then we are doing everything right, but did this nonsense forget to tell us to deliver nuclear strikes against Sweden? The nuclear strikes will be primarily directed at a structure that threatens Russia, and today it is a structure that threatens Russia with NATO. But Russia is not the United States and was not the first to use a vigorous loaf.
    7. Dembel77
      Dembel77 4 February 2016 09: 43 New
      +5
      Modeling, military exercises, or practicing training strikes — whatever — are an inalienable right of any armed forces of any state, including Russia. Moreover, NATO itself is already asking itself, missiles and missile defense there are different at the very borders of the Russian deploy. Are we calmly watching this? They will encircle us from all sides, take us in the ring, and we should be indifferent to this !? Nevermind gentlemen! It's not gonna go! And God forbid you to rock on us! Get to any. We, as they say, are peaceful people - but it is better to be friends with us.
    8. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 4 February 2016 09: 53 New
      +1
      As part of its overall military buildup, Russia's military maneuvers and exercises have reached levels unseen since the Cold War. Over the past three years, Russia has conducted at least 18 major exercises, some of which involved more than 100 thousand soldiers.

      Russia conducts EXERCISES, unlike the United States and its allies,
      leading WARs in the Middle East and Europe (Yugoslavia) since the collapse of the Union!
      And do not confuse and scare the WORLD!
    9. tol100v
      tol100v 4 February 2016 10: 02 New
      0
      Quote: oldseaman1957
      "" Stoltenberg: RF simulates nuclear strikes against NATO countries, incl. in Sweden "" -

      And HE models the increase of military budgets for the future, that’s the whole point of his statements! There is a threat, GIVE money!
    10. Blondy
      Blondy 4 February 2016 10: 09 New
      +1
      Putin once described it exhaustively. He's like a thief. disguised, shouts: "Stop the thief" - in my opinion, not yet a week has passed since they conducted command-staff exercises in England with the delivery of nuclear strikes.
    11. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 4 February 2016 10: 53 New
      +1
      ..... "Stoltenberg: RF simulates nuclear strikes against NATO countries, including Sweden" "...

      .... Ha ... !!!! ..... News !!!! .... Modeling .... And constantly ..... Just like the "partners" .... Why in this such ????? .... lol
    12. Pirogov
      Pirogov 4 February 2016 11: 21 New
      0
      The State Department waved his wand hysteria began! We will not hear that yet.
    13. go21zd45few
      go21zd45few 4 February 2016 12: 01 New
      0
      And you, Stolbtenberg, move NATO to those borders that were before 1991,
      and even better, generally self-destruct and there will be peace and order in Europe.
      We are RUSSIAN peaceful people, but who comes to us with a sword from the sword and perishes, this is exactly what you need to remember.
  2. Putinets
    Putinets 4 February 2016 09: 31 New
    -1
    Well, do you need to train in Papua New Guinea or better in the Sun?
  3. 24rus
    24rus 4 February 2016 09: 32 New
    +1
    This is ours have not tried))
  4. sledge
    sledge 4 February 2016 09: 34 New
    +1
    Another nonsense of NATO paranoid
    1. Stinger
      Stinger 4 February 2016 11: 55 New
      0
      "including Sweden"!
      Blabbed. I would like to have the Swedes in NATO so much that I want to write. That's what they are chasing mythical submarines. And we are more concerned about the situation in Honduras.
  5. dmitrymb
    dmitrymb 4 February 2016 09: 37 New
    +4
    balabol is given the command "fas". Only nuclear weapons keep Western ghouls from attacking Russia!
  6. dzerzhinsky
    dzerzhinsky 4 February 2016 09: 38 New
    +1
    Stoltenberg got drunk again from fear. Don’t be afraid, we won’t hurt you!
  7. engineer74
    engineer74 4 February 2016 09: 39 New
    +2
    These exercises also include modeling nuclear attacks on NATO and its partners ...

    "It's hard to learn - easy to fight!" - nothing more to say! good
  8. sds87
    sds87 4 February 2016 09: 40 New
    +3
    Stoltenberg, and NATO by chance did not overload its computers until they completely freeze, which calculate the destruction of Russia in the most effective way? When such people as the NATO secretary general start mentioning nuclear weapons, it means that the United States has already decided everything in Europe and is preparing a provocation in which Russia will be declared guilty. However, I can be wrong and all this is just "Game of Thrones" am
  9. drop
    drop 4 February 2016 09: 40 New
    +8
    Lord gentlemen from NATO, Mr. J. Stoltenberg! Think about the arms race and your bases in Europe, including at the borders of Russia, do not bode well. You understand that all of your oil production platforms have long been under the gun of the Russian Navy's submarine fleet. Assess the risk in the end. Stop dictating your conditions to our country. After all, Russia, and indeed the USSR, never attacked other countries. Russia is a self-sufficient country, but there is no European country. Therefore, you are eager for us. The people of Russia understand that you are attracted to our country. I have the honor.
  10. kapitan92
    kapitan92 4 February 2016 09: 41 New
    +5
    The bastards have begun to fuss! I don’t like how Russia straightens its shoulders. The NATO hysteria and insanity grows stronger year after year.
  11. morpogr
    morpogr 4 February 2016 09: 41 New
    +8
    They frighten themselves and make people fear. And the conclusion is that only one enemy of Russia is to give money and more to protect yourself from it. And most importantly, America is with us.
  12. BOB044
    BOB044 4 February 2016 09: 43 New
    +2
    Smoke, it’s like smoking and very strong nonsense. Even the face of Stoltenberg is visible. Do not go to the grandmother.
  13. triglav
    triglav 4 February 2016 09: 43 New
    +2
    "The duty link of the Swedish Air Force fighters did not have time to fly into the air"

    Described from fear? So you need it. Now do you understand what your armed forces are? The warriors are bad.
  14. Kahlan amnell
    Kahlan amnell 4 February 2016 09: 45 New
    +2
    The talking heads are different, but the songs are all the same. That Rasmussen, that Stoltenberg - the same wolf cantatas.
  15. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 4 February 2016 09: 46 New
    +2
    Against the background of their latest "documentary" film about the Russian attack on the Baltic countries, this is all innocent babble. And by the way, in this film, after the capture of the Baltic States, the United States and Britain by our polite people, "heroically" help the allies and inflict a nuclear strike on Russia. On the issue of nuclear strikes and the preparation of public opinion for a nuclear war.
  16. carabiner sks
    carabiner sks 4 February 2016 09: 47 New
    +1
    I was especially pleased that the fighters to intercept did not have time to rise.
  17. Vladimir 23rus
    Vladimir 23rus 4 February 2016 09: 48 New
    +4
    Stoltenberg called “the military base in Småland and the building of the intelligence service near Stockholm” as educational targets for Russians.
    This is megalomania tongue For nuclear strikes, there are more worthy goals than building a intelligence center. But most likely they just scare the Swedes. To make them ask faster.
  18. Odysseus
    Odysseus 4 February 2016 09: 50 New
    +4
    The meaning of this, at first glance, delusional, statement is to more closely connect Sweden and NATO. Ultimately, to achieve the inclusion of Sweden in NATO.
  19. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 4 February 2016 09: 52 New
    +2
    Nuclear strike simulation. And what is so unexpected about this? General Staff of any nuclear power is surely engaged in this.
  20. From Samara
    From Samara 4 February 2016 09: 53 New
    +2
    Normal phenomenon! Sweden has lost the status of a neutral country, let it sweat now ...
  21. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 4 February 2016 09: 53 New
    +3
    And the striped exercises on the perimeter of Russia, how to evaluate ??? am
  22. ltx777
    ltx777 4 February 2016 09: 53 New
    +1
    Europe no longer knows how to distract its citizens from pressing problems - a crisis in the EU economy and migrants. Stoltenberg is right in principle, we will simulate such a blow if migrants and terrorists make up 100% of the population of Sweden)
  23. From Samara
    From Samara 4 February 2016 09: 56 New
    +1
    Even in Austria and Switzerland, it is necessary to model what they would think when they renounce neutrality!
  24. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 4 February 2016 09: 59 New
    0
    Who Needs a Nuclear Strike on Sweden? It does not have strike forces, even with tactical nuclear weapons. Its fleet is "pocket", there is no common border ... But it will join NATO, plant a nuclear arsenal on it, and the coordinates of "this fool" will immediately appear in the warheads of our missiles (or where they are stored there).
  25. vitaliy.rnd
    vitaliy.rnd 4 February 2016 09: 59 New
    +2
    This is their "What about us?" already tired.
  26. nthvbyfnjh2015
    nthvbyfnjh2015 4 February 2016 09: 59 New
    0
    The American chief military dude was late with conclusions, only about two or three years had passed, and he was just choking on it. OPERATINGLY !!! I could wait a couple of years with my conclusions.
  27. 31rus
    31rus 4 February 2016 10: 00 New
    +2
    Dear, everything is correct, there are more bases, more objects in Europe, so there are more targets for our missiles, what’s new or secret, and the gentlemen from Europe should understand that for any machinations including this statement, the answer will be adequate
  28. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 4 February 2016 10: 01 New
    +1
    Well, of course, nonsense, a patient with persecution mania, but towards the psyche ...
    I'd love to ask Stoltenberg: Well, what? Are you glad Do you want your well-fed, spoiled citizens to live that way? In constant fear?
    Well ... Well, these Tolerasts and panic may begin, oh love their clients in NATO, oh love laughing
  29. Lator kron
    Lator kron 4 February 2016 10: 01 New
    +1
    PPC, well, he has a mug ... a classic portrait of the SS - a dead head.
  30. Million
    Million 4 February 2016 10: 03 New
    +1
    As the Americans themselves would say: these countries threaten our security)
  31. kergudu straight
    kergudu straight 4 February 2016 10: 03 New
    +1
    Plan, do not plan, but "Vigorous Migrant" has already grabbed the whole geyurop, so they are planning escape routes to Russia
  32. kg pv
    kg pv 4 February 2016 10: 06 New
    +2
    This is what Sweden should have done so that it would have to be thrown at with a vigorous bomb? recourse
  33. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 4 February 2016 10: 06 New
    +1
    The preparation of nuclear strikes against a likely enemy is a common practice of operational planning in the armies of ALL nuclear powers. Another thing is who is considered a likely adversary. And if the Swedish authorities chose NATO as their partners, then one should not be surprised that they were on the list of potential targets for Russian missiles. Stoltenberg knows and realizes this very well. And the statement is exclusively populist in nature, counting on public opinion. We can make the same statements.
  34. teron
    teron 4 February 2016 10: 07 New
    +2
    One must be prepared for everything - at least for a nuclear war with the Vatican, at least for the arrival of the Martians. U.S. European Allies who have built military facilities for the designated alliance - fiery greetings!
  35. Lator kron
    Lator kron 4 February 2016 10: 12 New
    +3
    And in general, what did you want? We were building up, building up our bases near the borders of Russia, they pushed nuclear weapons there. Formed offensive groups. Lighted hot spots near the borders of the Russian Federation, new conflicts in the same Latvia, etc.
    And oops! they are surprised that they are preparing an adequate response.
    Guys when she arrives this planet will already be unsuitable for life. In vain you started it.
    Neither money, nor bunkers, nor underground cities will last long without a surface. And on the surface after an exchange of nuclear strikes it will be impossible to live for 300-500 years.
    Even if Russia is destroyed, the Doomsday machine, the "perimeter" system, they nicknamed it "The Dead Hand" will strike back without the participation of people.
  36. askort154
    askort154 4 February 2016 10: 16 New
    +2
    Skewheads! A slow-motion "nuclear strike" is already on your territory. Its affected area is the whole of Europe, the period of disintegration is not foreseen, but on the contrary, over time it will only become more active. Just Russia, it has nothing to do with it.
  37. An64
    An64 4 February 2016 10: 17 New
    +2
    No wonder. We have nuclear weapons. There must be goals for him - this is obvious! It is foolish to have a weapon and not learn to use it. And who our enemies (or rather, where the military threats to our security come from) are clearly stated in the military doctrine. No secrets, no unknown facts. We will assume that the NATO simply stated well-known things (a friend who does not know wink ).
  38. Tusv
    Tusv 4 February 2016 10: 18 New
    +1
    You will see Mr. Solberg. Nefiga we do not model. We are already working on OTU, and Nuclear deterrence has long been on the DB and all of NATO is in sight.
  39. kizhe
    kizhe 4 February 2016 10: 19 New
    0
    We are still only modeling, but NATO has long planned everything. Since the advent of nuclear weapons. So, let him shut up and not shame.
  40. serkhan
    serkhan 4 February 2016 10: 21 New
    +1
    Stoltenberg can’t wait. He reminds me of a flowing cat, he has already put up his bare NATO back to the very limits and has indicated a point where to poke him and is already modeling the whole process ...
  41. Ivan Tucha
    Ivan Tucha 4 February 2016 10: 25 New
    +1
    old paranoid.
  42. hartlend
    hartlend 4 February 2016 10: 27 New
    0
    The poor fellow is forced to snuggle up to prove his loyalty and usefulness to the owners. After all, they can also strip rations.
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. Papapg
    Papapg 4 February 2016 10: 28 New
    0
    How should we train? And in general, the presence of nuclear weapons provides for the possibility of its use, well, how can you do without training? Yes, and we need to be bolder, for example, load the "POPLAR" on a ship, with an escort and ride it across the seas, they will begin to be indignant, but he is not charged to say. And this statement reminds me of interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. Or maybe it's time to worry about our soldiers so that the soldiers do not have stress after shooting at a potential enemy - to decorate chest targets No. 4 with photomurals with photos of soldiers of these opponents? This is our internal affair!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 4 February 2016 18: 06 New
      0
      It is necessary to bring all these guys from NATO to a nervous breakdown, and there they will bend.
  45. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 4 February 2016 10: 28 New
    +2
    The opening of the century, of course. Stoltenberg cherishes the blue dream that Russia will surrender its nuclear weapons, self-disintegrate, seize the micro-Gaidar on the throne, donate its resources, etc.

    I always wondered how the NATOrasts sucked the speculation about a nuclear attack from the fact of the flight of aircraft on duty.
  46. coleg-10
    coleg-10 4 February 2016 10: 28 New
    +1
    Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg opens Sweden's eyes!
  47. ArcanAG
    ArcanAG 4 February 2016 10: 35 New
    +1
    And why do we need, excuse me, to strike a nuclear strike against Sweden?
    Why does she threaten us so much?
  48. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 4 February 2016 10: 36 New
    0
    Mr. simply wanted to express the idea that NATO, unlike us, does not model attacks on Sweden. We can well say in response that we are not simulating attacks on Yakutia. And do not even plan.
  49. 72jora72
    72jora72 4 February 2016 10: 37 New
    +1
    two Tu-22M3 and four Su-27 flew from the Swedish border, allegedly conducting a training attack on targets in Sweden. ” He also said that "the duty link of the Swedish Air Force fighters did not have time to fly into the air."
    I hope that in the future, only from one glance at our airplanes will they begin to involuntarily rush right into their pants.
  50. GEV67
    GEV67 4 February 2016 10: 39 New
    0
    "Click on the button, we will definitely click, but then ...."