Duty of Russian anti-aircraft complexes in Syria (video)

47
Channel RT published a video, the cadres of which give an idea of ​​the combat duty on the basis of Khmeimim of the Russian complexes Pantsir-C2 and C-400.



These anti-aircraft systems were deployed in Syria in December last year.

  • russian.rt.com, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    4 February 2016 08: 23
    Handsome!
    Peaceful sky over your head!
    1. +25
      4 February 2016 08: 26
      Quote: Barnaul, Altai
      Handsome!
      Peaceful sky over your head!

      It’s for sure, the peaceful sky is just above Syria and the calculations of C-400 and Shell-C2 are established.
      1. +9
        4 February 2016 08: 31
        God grant that you would never have to work for real - study, train, improve your skills and have a peaceful sky.
        1. aba
          +15
          4 February 2016 08: 42
          He served on the S-200 first Angara, then Vega. In training, everything is cool! But once a combat alert was announced for an unidentified target and everything turned out for real, but later it turned out that it was a civilian flight and what inconsistencies were either with the codes or with the schedule (forgotten over the years) ...
          There I was then pounded for another half day, I was just in the cockpit on combat duty.
          1. +3
            4 February 2016 10: 36
            There were alarms on their planes with the broken "Friend or Foe" ... on the reconnaissance planes flying along the border ... They were out, the covers over the buttons were raised ... Only the launch commands were waiting ... Only adrenaline ... And nothing was shaking ...
            1. aba
              0
              5 February 2016 11: 52
              So your habit has already become a habit ... But I served deep in the rear and not every day military alarms, but at one time it was our unit that brought down Paers. So we did not work on real goals every day. And as true as anyone flies, so we accompany.
              1. 0
                10 February 2016 15: 01
                Perhaps you are right wink
        2. +6
          4 February 2016 09: 07
          The main thing is not to have to fly. We say "the best place for a dagger is the scabbard."
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        4 February 2016 12: 31
        Quote: 79807420129
        It’s for sure, the peaceful sky is just above Syria and the calculations of C-400 and Shell-C2 are established.

        But why show settings at positions, and even with reference to objects, it is not clear. The armor is right at the start of the take-off, and why give this information to ENEMIES? Yes, and we do not need ...
        1. 0
          4 February 2016 13: 02
          Quote: Aleksander
          But why show settings at positions, and even with reference to objects, it is not clear. The armor is right at the start of the take-off, and why give this information to ENEMIES? Yes, and we do not have to ..

          Opens the secret too. It's like closing your eyes with your palms and saying, "I can't be seen." The RS-135 for three hundred kilometers copies all our positions with reference to the terrain, and this byaka can fly for 10 hours and do not go to the grandmother, it flies every day 12 miles from the coast.
          The main thing here is that air defense systems have the ability to change position very quickly, and Armor and Buki - instantly
        2. 0
          4 February 2016 13: 06
          Quote: Aleksander
          But why show settings at positions, and even with reference to objects, it is not clear.

          Who cares, everyone already knows. Yes
    2. +1
      4 February 2016 08: 34
      everything is new, just removed the plastic film! Yes the Marine is handsome, did not show his face. soldier
      1. +1
        4 February 2016 08: 46
        Yes .. It's hot in their combat. And we have winter in Russia. Snow goes. Are the men there probably missing the snowball?
      2. +2
        4 February 2016 08: 51
        Only one thing is bad - the mountains are around, and this reduces the effectiveness of this complex. The video shows that the "Pantsir" can only work on near targets - these mountains are not far away. Most likely the S-400 has a more advantageous position, while the Pantsir's business is to defend this complex and destroy enemy targets on the approaches to the airfield.
        1. +1
          4 February 2016 10: 58
          As an experiment, they put one launcher with 40Н6Е.
          They have not yet been adopted. Pass the test. And so any F can be removed from half of Turkey.
    3. +1
      4 February 2016 09: 05
      Quote: Barnaul, Altai
      Handsome!
      Peaceful sky over your head!

      NATO has thought now, but some kind of trick on their part will slip through in the near future.
    4. +1
      4 February 2016 10: 38
      I am now looking at the "Star" d / f "Fortress Osovets", I can not write ....
    5. 0
      4 February 2016 10: 50
      But who knows how C2 differs from C1?
      1. +3
        4 February 2016 12: 13
        Quote: just EXPL
        But who knows how C2 differs from C1?

        ... software and radar processing became two canvases and an expanded range of missiles ... I can’t say anything about missiles ... silence is everywhere everywhere .. hi
  2. -1
    4 February 2016 08: 23
    Their 16 fairy revolves on our CANISTER soldier .
    1. +1
      4 February 2016 08: 36
      Can you hear at least one example of how f 16 turned the shell?
      1. +2
        4 February 2016 10: 43
        Not a carapace spun, but a carapace spun! That makes a big difference!
  3. +2
    4 February 2016 08: 32
    One word .... is impressive.
  4. +3
    4 February 2016 08: 33
    Not much, of course. So far, the S-400 is more of a scarecrow for Turkey. I don’t know if anything survived in Syria from the previous air defense system? If not, then the CA from the side means there is no one else to issue for this system. And relying only on itself and only its radar, the S-400 is itself a priority and well-highlighted target for the enemy.
    1. +4
      4 February 2016 10: 56
      Quote: Marconi41
      S-400 is itself a priority and well-highlighted target for the enemy.


      The highlight of this complex, however, as well as the entire base in Latakia, does not play any role, because the coordinates are known. can be specified at any time, e.g. satellite reconnaissance or the same AWACS.

      By the way, there is also a Buk-M2 and electronic warfare equipment.
      They showed what already flashed in the reports.
      1. 0
        5 February 2016 00: 07
        Quote: Alexandr-NVR
        The highlight of this complex, however, as well as the entire base in Latakia, does not play any role,

        I meant anti-missile missiles. They do not need clarifications from intelligence. And whether Buki or Pantsiri will bring them down depends on the quantity of ammunition released. Although these products are very expensive, but the game is worth the candle. In addition, they can be used with the launch of conventional CDs in a given square. This will further complicate the response.
  5. +1
    4 February 2016 08: 33
    Inspires .. Pride and Awe ..
    I hope that one species will be enough not to release a single cartridge of a single missile.
    Good luck ... God is with us.
  6. +1
    4 February 2016 08: 34
    What movements, yes guys, then we are ahead of the rest! And the desire to fly over Syria fell away automatically! drinks
    1. +1
      4 February 2016 08: 51
      Quote: Tankman55
      And the desire to fly over Syria fell away automatically! drinks


      In fairness, it should be noted that the desire to fly over Syria has disappeared only in certain areas (i.e., over Latakia, Damascus ...) and as for ALL Syria, the Western coalition also violates all norms of international law. And the point here is not the reluctance of the Syrian government to stop all this disgrace, they just do not have the opportunity, but we have ... but the combat use of the S-400 on the planes of "friends" is primarily a political decision that does not yet exist.
  7. +1
    4 February 2016 08: 41
    Who knows, the noise comes from the engines that rotate the generator to power all systems? This is how much fuel and resource eats. Not easier yet to connect to electricity?

    ps Do not tell me that something is not visible on the forum "Professor" and other nosy comrades. Self-liquidated?
    1. +1
      4 February 2016 08: 49
      Not easier yet to connect to electricity?

      Yes, most likely connected to ground power supplies with a reserve from the generator.
      1. +6
        4 February 2016 09: 27
        Quote: Wedmak
        Yes, most likely connected to ground power supplies with a reserve from the generator.

        combat duty, only from a diesel engine! constant, and sudden voltage drops are excluded.soldier
    2. +1
      4 February 2016 09: 56
      Quote: Kuzkin Batyan
      Not easier yet to connect to electricity?

      Easier when tracking work. Readiness number One - you are already reporting: "Ready for battle" - that is, ready to work to defeat real targets.
      Imagine, they shied away with an electromagnetic pulse, cut down the network, and it takes time enough to restart the complex to restart it.
  8. +1
    4 February 2016 08: 42
    Quote: Marconi41
    S-400 is itself a priority and well-highlighted target for the enemy.

    For this, they also brought modern electronic warfare systems there! I think they will "smear" this goal!
  9. 0
    4 February 2016 08: 53
    Well done !!! powerful missile defense systems, you can not say.
  10. +5
    4 February 2016 09: 11
    Duty of Russian anti-aircraft systems in Syria
    1. +1
      4 February 2016 09: 21
      From this smartphone, it would be nice to send an SMS to a heroic Turkish pilot who stealthily shot down our DRYING ...
  11. 0
    4 February 2016 09: 36
    Since September 2014, the US Air Force began to use the F-22 in combat use. F-22s performed at least 112 combat missions in the Syrian sky, demonstrated their versatility - completing an attack mission, reconnaissance of enemy ground forces, guiding other planes and escorting bombers.

    They say that after the appearance of Syria S-400, F-22 stopped flying to Syria.
  12. +1
    4 February 2016 10: 14
    Wouldn't it be better to disperse the technique stronger?
  13. +1
    4 February 2016 10: 35

    Yesterday’s Star video.
  14. +1
    4 February 2016 10: 39
    They drove the "Kamaz" into the mud ... It can be seen that it was window dressing ... Twisted to the sides, the guns were raised and lowered ... Apparently, even the "high" was not turned on ... The soldier is standing next to the operators very calmly .. ...
    1. 0
      4 February 2016 11: 11
      Yes, yes ... I practiced on the Buk-M1 - urgent .. if the control battery works, it is better in the car or away .. Sparrow fries ..
      1. 0
        4 February 2016 14: 18
        Quote: Yak-3P
        Yes, yes ... I practiced on the Buk-M1 - urgent .. if the control battery works, it is better in the car or away .. Sparrow fries ..

        Legends.


        Of course, you should not cuddle with the base station turned on. At least for a long time - for sure.

        Strongly not worth it get into the focus of the radar at various military sites: the power there is many times higher than the BS.
        But the radiation itself (flux density) is lower than power lines


        and a soldier
        Quote: The Cat
        The soldier is standing next to the operators very calmly ...

        especially nothing will happen.
        Otherwise, all the passengers at the airports would have been "fried" for a long time

        Radar stations are equipped, as a rule, with mirror-type antennas and have a narrowly directed radiation pattern in the form of a beam directed along the optical axis.

        Radar systems operate at frequencies from 500 MHz to 15 GHz, however, individual systems can operate at frequencies up to 100 GHz. The EM signal they create is fundamentally different from the radiation of other sources. This is due to the fact that the periodic movement of the antenna in space leads to spatial discontinuity of the radiation. Temporary intermittent irradiation due to the cyclical operation of the radar radiation. Operating time in various operating modes of radio equipment can be calculated from several hours to a day. So for meteorological radars with time discontinuities 30 min - radiation, 30 min - pause the total operating time does not exceed 12 h, while the radar stations of airports in most cases work around the clock. The width of the radiation pattern in the horizontal plane is usually a few degrees, and the duration of the irradiation over the observation period is tens of milliseconds.

        Metrological radars can create at a distance of 1 km PES ~ 100 W / m2 for each irradiation cycle. Airport radars create PES ~ 0,5 W / m2 at a distance of 60 m. Marine radar equipment is installed on all ships, usually it has transmitter power an order of magnitude lower than that of airfield radars, so in normal mode, scanning PES, created at a distance of several meters, does not exceed 10 W / m2.

        An increase in the power of radars for various purposes and the use of highly directional antennas of all-round visibility leads to a significant increase in the intensity of electromagnetic radiation of the microwave range and creates high-density zones with high energy flux on the terrain. The most unfavorable conditions are noted in residential areas of cities, within which airports are located: Irkutsk, Sochi, Syktyvkar, Rostov-on-Don and several others.

        Radar injury is a radar injury. If the radiation is weak, then there is no injury, but there is a chronic radar disease.
  15. +3
    4 February 2016 10: 57
    Quote: The Cat
    Apparently, even the "high" was not included ... The soldier is standing next to the operators very calmly ...

    So Saldatik and the operators are in the "local" - "high" on the drum. And in the booth, bring the neon bulb with a bulb to the microwave generator - lit
  16. 0
    4 February 2016 12: 56
    Quote: The Cat
    They drove the "Kamaz" into the mud ... It can be seen that it was window dressing ... Twisted to the sides, the guns were raised and lowered ... Apparently, even the "high" was not turned on ... The soldier is standing next to the operators very calmly .. ...

    Well, well ... you say window dressing .... ZRPK where he was then indicated the position, there it is. The rotation of the PAR-already work in the "review". "Convulsive" jerks of the platform with lowering, raising of guns and missiles, switching on the "tracking" mode or a thermal imager, etc., the "soldier" is usually in another place, but the operator was simply not told anything. crying
  17. 0
    4 February 2016 14: 06
    Quote: Irbis5974
    Well, the operator simply did not say anything.

    The operator was reassured, approximately with the following speeches: "Standing at a household microwave oven, you get much more microwave than you are standing here" - this is true.
    The Cat, I think, hinted at passive tracking. All the same, the Pvoshnik Pvoshnik will understand. It seems to me that he served on the DKP
    1. 0
      10 February 2016 15: 07
      Quote: Tusv
      It seems to me that he served on the DKP



      30Н6 wink

      And everyone was hiding when the high was turned on ...
  18. 0
    4 February 2016 22: 20
    [quote = andrei yurievich] on alert, only from a diesel engine! constant

    [quote = Tusv] Pvoshnik Pvoshnik will understand

    ..and also that the sentry is under the petal

    (ZK VU ZRV beginning P-12, P-15 1970-1972)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"