Military Review

Syrian "moderate opposition" delegation leaves Geneva on command from Riyadh

80
UN special envoy for the settlement of the Syrian conflict, Staffan de Mistura, was forced to announce the suspension of the work of the negotiation team in Geneva. In fact, the statement about the "suspension" of negotiations can be called a clear exaggeration, since full-fledged negotiations have not begun. And they did not start for the simple reason that a scattered delegation of the so-called Syrian opposition tried every time to put forward demands, after which they allegedly would “sit down at the negotiating table.” One of these requirements was as follows: the Syrian army should stop its offensive, and the Russian Aerospace Forces should stop the air operation.


Syrian "moderate opposition" delegation leaves Geneva on command from Riyadh


The Syrian "opposition delegation", in which, as it turned out, representatives of overt terrorist groups were present, made it clear that they are not the party that should talk about the fulfillment of some requirements. The onset of the SAR army and the bombing of the positions of terrorists by the airborne forces of the Russian Federation continued.

The Syrian opposition on this "basis" stated that it was leaving Geneva. According to Rider, referring to sources close to the negotiations, the Syrian "moderate opposition" received such a command from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar.

At the State Department, the United States immediately declared that Russia "had to meet halfway, and to begin full-fledged negotiations between Damascus and the opposition to abandon the bombings." US State Department spokesman John Kirby stated that "the bombing ofRajana objects influenced the peace process, and Russia had to stop the operation. ”

Who and what else should Russia? .. And since when did the objects of the terrorist infrastructure become civilian?

Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation Gennady Gatilov called the demarche "moderate opposition to Syria" an attempt to thwart the process of resolving the situation in the country. Gennady Gatilova quotes RIA News:

Their (the delegation of the Syrian Opposition High Negotiating Committee) attempts to disrupt the negotiation process on the pretext that Russia continues to carry out a military operation in Syria are totally unacceptable, since this is about combating the terrorist threat in this country. And the second pretext that they cannot participate in the negotiations, as this does not allow the exacerbated humanitarian situation in Syria, is also untenable.
Photos used:
www.igt.org
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 4 February 2016 06: 46
    21
    Another major success by Assad's troops at the front, they ("moderate opposition") will definitely return to the negotiating table and themselves will ask for negotiations with Assad.
    1. Cormorants
      Cormorants 4 February 2016 06: 54
      +5
      These Syrian opposition are real pug!
      1. Beaver
        Beaver 4 February 2016 06: 59
        29
        Quote: Cormorants
        These Syrian opposition are real pug!

        Wolves are shameful. negative About these still grandfather Krylov wrote: "And I have known your wolf nature for a long time, And therefore my custom is not to make the world with wolves otherwise, Like having skinned them down." laughing
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 4 February 2016 07: 41
          +6
          It should be noted that the West’s hopes for a negotiation process are either illusory or provocative against Syria and Russia. Or a tactical move by opposition militants to regroup forces. Why?

          The fact is that the “Islamic State”, becoming a caliphate, is obliged to pursue its foreign policy according to the laws of Sunni Islam. In Islamic law, this is what is called "Islamic Jihad" - the forcible expansion of its influence in countries in which non-Muslims rule, as well as "infidels." The recognition of borders is a taboo, which the Prophet Muhammad spoke about, and today ISIS propaganda videos repeat. The Caliph must conduct jihad at least once a year. He CANNOT BE INACTIVE, because it is a punishable SIN for him.
          The modern international system, born from the Westphalian world of the 1648 year, is based on the readiness of each state to recognize borders, even with great reluctance. For ISIS, such a confession would be SUICIDE. For ISIS, this is not possible, because it is an act of LESSONITY.
          See “ISIS. The ominous shadow of the Caliphate / comp. Andrey Kemal. - M .: Algorithm, 2015. - 224 sec. - (Military columnist) - S. 80-82.
          The ISIS leaders agreed to TEMPORAL arrangements in the negotiations solely with a view to observing their conditions
          the Syrian army must stop its offensive, and the Russian aerospace forces stop the air operation.
          which, in principle, is not unacceptable in itself for Syria and Iraq.
          1. ARES623
            ARES623 4 February 2016 08: 10
            +5
            Quote: Tatiana
            In Islamic law, this is what is called "Islamic Jihad" - the forcible expansion of its influence in countries in which non-Muslims rule, as well as "infidels." The recognition of borders is a taboo, which the Prophet Muhammad spoke about, and today ISIS propaganda videos repeat. The Caliph must conduct jihad at least once a year. He CANNOT BE INACTIVE, because it is a punishable SIN for him.

            I think it is almost a fatal mistake to relate ISIS to Islam. The Koran should be read adjusted for the time, because the coverage of the issues of confrontation of the faithful with other communities should be considered only in the context of the time frame, and accordingly the situation, the period of writing the text. The use of the term "jihad" in the meaning of the physical destruction of people of non-Islamic religion is an exclusive substitution of concepts, noodles on the ears for the sake of achieving specific political and economic goals, which are not profitable to talk about directly. This is tantamount to arguing about the "sinfulness" of violations of the "concepts" of the thieves' world.
            1. Pereira
              Pereira 4 February 2016 08: 50
              +6
              This is sophistry. What is the point of delving into the study of the Koran if, under its cover, illiterate bandits kill people every day? To whom and what do you want to prove?
              The best argument is not a sura, it's an air bomb.
              We will talk about the interpretation of Islam after the victory in Syria.
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 4 February 2016 10: 55
                0
                ARES623
                The Qur'an must be read adjusted for time.

                You tell ISIS leaders if brave. laughing
                They settled on the tenets of Islam of the 6-7 centuries.
                I specifically refer to the materials of the "Military Observer" indicating pages 80-82. Now I am reading this book excitedly.
                See “ISIS. The ominous shadow of the Caliphate / comp. Andrey Kemal. - M .: Algorithm, 2015. - 224 sec. - (Military columnist) - S. 80-82.

                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 4 February 2016 11: 21
                  0
                  Pereira
                  This is sophistry. What is the point of delving into the study of the Koran if, under its cover, illiterate bandits kill people every day? To whom and what do you want to prove?
                  The best argument is not a sura, it's an air bomb.

                  So I stand in your same position! But this is not sophistry. The enemy needs to know. ISIS is a religious Muslim sect of total global genocide.
                  But the knowledge of the Koran just allows Russia, Syria, Iraq, EU countries, etc. Do not make any agreements on an alleged cease-fire with ISIS, as well as with the USA, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE.
                  That is why I am making a special reference to the materials of the "Military Observer" with the indication of pages 80-82. Now I am reading this book excitedly.
                  See “ISIS. The ominous shadow of the Caliphate / comp. Andrey Kemal. - M .: Algorithm, 2015. - 224 sec. - (Military columnist) - S. 80-82
                2. ARES623
                  ARES623 4 February 2016 11: 32
                  0
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  You tell ISIS leaders if brave.
                  They settled on the tenets of Islam of the 6-7 centuries.

                  Tatyana, in your previous commentary the point of view I disputed sounds like your statement, that's why I am addressing you. And I have nothing to say to the leaders of ISIS. At one time, I had to talk with such persons in short bursts from the AK. There was no time to apply other measures of persuasion and agitation for Soviet power, and did not see the need for it. About your caustic "if courageous" I did not quite understand. You decided to show me something? What exactly? I don't think there is any benefit to you from being too aggressive. Although it may be a permanent permanent state, it is no longer my profile ...
                  1. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 5 February 2016 05: 31
                    0
                    ARES623
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Quote ARES623
                    The Qur'an must be read adjusted for time.
                    You tell ISIS leaders if brave. laughing
                    They settled on the tenets of Islam of the 6-7 centuries.
                    You decided to present something to me? What exactly? I do not think that there is any benefit to you from excessive aggressiveness. Although this may be a permanent permanent state, but this is not my profile ...

                    Dear ARES623! First, do not shy away from the answer that my “aggressiveness” is supposedly “not your profile”! Your! It is yours! laughing Since it was you who wrote in your post from 08: 10
                    I think that correlating ISIS with Islam is almost a fatal mistake. The Qur'an should be read adjusted for the time, because coverage of issues of confrontation between the faithful and other communities should be considered only in the context of the time frame, and accordingly the situation, the period of writing the text.

                    Here you yourself have a mistake. ISIS, ISIS or DAISH is defined by experts precisely as a cruel sectarian Jihadist group in modern Islam with religious Islamist dogmas and Shariah exactly 6-7 century. IG is a neo-Wahhabi state, tracing paper from the emirates, built by the ancestors of the present Saudis and their Muslim allies. Therefore, the IG cannot be reduced simply to a gang of international mercenary bandits. Moreover, modern liberal Islam in its reform form over the past few decades has now receded into the background, and Islamism has come almost everywhere in the study of Islam. Moreover, to the extent that liberal Islamic schools of the 20 century are no longer taught in Islamic universities, namely, they teach the Islamism of the 6-7 centuries. Not understanding this means turning a blind eye to the growing and most dangerous problem for all of humanity.
                    Therefore it is yours
                    The use of the term "jihad" in the meaning of the physical destruction of people of non-Islamic religion is an exclusive substitution of concepts, noodles on the ears for the sake of achieving specific political and economic goals, which are not profitable to talk about directly. This is tantamount to arguing about the "sinfulness" of violations of the "concepts" of the thieves' world.
                    it is for you, alas, just a complete "otpad" laughing in understanding this problem!
                    So you should not be offended in vain! drinks
              2. The comment was deleted.
          2. Andrey Yuryevich
            Andrey Yuryevich 4 February 2016 08: 40
            +9
            Quote: Tatiana
            For ISIS, this is not possible, because it is an act of LESSONITY.

            there is such a sense that "faith" is a screen here, and ISIS-Daesh is a weapon of the United States ... a simple logical chain of events in recent years ... hi
            1. Diana Ilyina
              Diana Ilyina 4 February 2016 08: 58
              10
              Quote: Andrew Y.
              there is such a sense that "faith" is a screen here, and ISIS-Daesh is a weapon of the United States ... a simple logical chain of events in recent years ... hi


              In fact of the matter! I strongly doubt that the Saudis have any real independent influence in the region, however, like the Qataris! There, the United States rules everything, well, maybe with the exception of Erdogan, who is trying to be an independent unit, but at the same time hide his fifth point under NATO! So the team may have passed from Riyadh or Doha, but before that it passed from Washington! The mattress makers want to stop ours in Syria with all their might, so they stir up trouble with the so-called "oppositionists"!

              Anyway, this whole circus called negotiations is just a screen for diverting the eyes! This "opposition" does not represent anyone, just like our so-called. "not a systemic opposition"! And the Americans know this, we know this, everyone knows this, but the Americans pretend that they do not know that we know, we do the same thing, and the "opposition" pretends that it is the opposition and thinks that we do not know that she's not real!
              1. black
                black 4 February 2016 09: 20
                +3
                I am more and more convinced that Washington, its Middle Eastern friends, simply threw up. This is when the king rules, but does not rule. This is not a US manner - to drop negotiations at the very beginning. Those love the girl to mock until she becomes a grandmother. And the fact that the "oppositionists" refused to negotiate is even good. Bombs are falling, tanks are driving and there will soon be no one to talk to.
                1. avia1991
                  avia1991 4 February 2016 10: 55
                  0
                  Quote: black
                  Bombs are falling, tanks are moving and there will soon be no one to talk to.

                  Maybe it's easier to do? A couple more "Gauges" for specific purposes in Doha, Riyadh and Ankara .. Thus, we will clearly show everyone that we can beat without touching civilian objects, and at the same time, we will get rid of the most annoying "splinters". wassat
                2. ARES623
                  ARES623 4 February 2016 12: 21
                  0
                  Quote: black
                  And the fact that the "oppositionists" refused to negotiate is even good. Bombs are falling, tanks are driving and there will soon be no one to talk to.

                  Those who refused are not exactly oppositionists, but rather repainted bandits and US puppets. The real opposition with which one can talk is the Kurds. They are at war, to discuss with them for the honor and future of the country. Although there is not so simple. Assad is still not Yanyk, he will not sign any crap. And Kurds are not so easy to convince within the framework of autonomy.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. cap
          cap 4 February 2016 08: 47
          +4
          Quote: Castor
          Wolves are shameful. negative About such people, grandfather Krylov wrote: "And I have known your wolf nature for a long time, And therefore my custom is not to make a world with wolves otherwise, Like having removed their skin from them." laughing


          How much beshbarmak and shawarma went to this moderate mug. If this is not the secret of the State Department. Or at McDonald’s they trained the opposition. A moderate funnel is clearly not enough to bury the whole opposition. Hammered into the ground and no conditions. More funnels less opposition. Take the latter with your hands up. am
        4. NIKNN
          NIKNN 4 February 2016 20: 47
          +2
          Syrian "moderate opposition" delegation leaves Geneva on command from Riyadh


          There is still God in heaven. Glory to you Lord!
      2. Angara
        Angara 4 February 2016 07: 15
        +8
        Quote: Cormorants
        These Syrian opposition are real pug!

        There is not a pug, but the most ordinary jackal. Do not yap, but howl!
      3. SveTok
        SveTok 4 February 2016 07: 51
        +1
        Banduks understand only one language and the sooner they understand it, the more they will survive.
        1. go21zd45few
          go21zd45few 4 February 2016 08: 05
          +3
          Yes, there is nothing to their survival, only their complete destruction will ensure peace on
          the Middle East, and hence the security in Europe and Russia.
          1. Diana Ilyina
            Diana Ilyina 4 February 2016 09: 09
            +8
            Quote: go21zd45few
            Yes, there is nothing to their survival, only their complete destruction will ensure peace on
            the Middle East, and hence the security in Europe and Russia.


            I agree that all the so-called "non-systemic opposition" must be disposed of completely! And not only in Syria, but also in Russia! Tired of looking at these filthy faces of "amateurs and guardians" of Russia and its people! As you look at Gozman, Reichelgauz, Svanidze, Kasparov, Makarevich, Tsipko, Akhedzhakova and other trash, you really want to go and volunteer at SMERSH! And most importantly, the names of the "amateurs" of Russia, as a selection!
            1. avia1991
              avia1991 4 February 2016 10: 58
              +2
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              I so want to go and sign up as a volunteer in SMERSH!
              Diana! DO NOT .. Do not spoil the impression smile love
              1. Diana Ilyina
                Diana Ilyina 4 February 2016 11: 05
                +8
                Quote: avia1991
                Diana! DO NOT .. Do not spoil the impression smile love


                Yes, do not pay attention, this is me, thoughts out loud! It’s just that when I see the Russophobian face of a gozman, I am already twitching from disgust! love
                1. avia1991
                  avia1991 4 February 2016 11: 17
                  +2
                  Quote: Diana Ilyina
                  when I see the Russophobian face of Gozman, I am already distorting from disgust!

                  laughing Well, you can understand that!
                  But you don’t get your hands dirty, the time will come - we will deal with them! If someone doesn’t have time to escape wassat
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. SSR
      SSR 4 February 2016 08: 14
      +2
      Quote: avvg
      Another major success by Assad's troops at the front, they ("moderate opposition") will definitely return.

      The main thing is that they would definitely return to Syria and let all the advisers of the Turkoman be in Syria and let them remain in the Syrian land.
    4. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 4 February 2016 08: 37
      +3
      One of these requirements was as follows: the Syrian army must stop its offensive, and the Russian Air Force to stop the air operation.
      and a sausage on their collar! "opposition" fucking ... who can guarantee that this is not a delegation from ISIS, with such requests?
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 4 February 2016 09: 00
        +4
        US State Department spokesman John Kirby said “bombing civilian facilities influenced the peace process, and Russia had to stop the operation. ”
        Well, they are equal in themselves. Russian VKS do not do such things.
        Who and what else should Russia? .. And since when did the objects of the terrorist infrastructure become civilian?
        We must not stop bombing terrorist targets in Syria, but rather intensify the attacks on them! Then the so-called "moderate opposition" would be more accommodating. By the way, in the photo at the top of the article, a former member of the Syrian government - in 2012, officially became an American litter.
        Former Syrian Prime Minister Riyadh Hijab, who fled to Jordan last week, condemned the current government of the country, saying that "Bashar al-Assad's regime is close to collapse."
        In a statement broadcast on Jordanian television, Hijab said the Syrian leadership had crashed economically, militarily and morally, and now controlled no more than 30% of the country's territory.
        The former prime minister called on opposition forces abroad to unite, and the Syrian army to go over to the side of the rebels.
        At the same time, he stressed that he is joining the ranks of the opposition "not as a leader, but as a simple soldier."
        This was the first public interview of Hijab since he left the country.
        In response to this statement, the United States lifted the sanctions imposed on it.
        http://kuznetsovvn.ru/news/news_399.html
    5. Dam
      Dam 4 February 2016 09: 08
      +3
      Not everyone will survive to the next negotiations. Syrian poker, the number of players is reduced VKS from negotiations to negotiations
      1. avia1991
        avia1991 4 February 2016 11: 02
        0
        Quote: Damm
        Not everyone will survive to the next negotiations.

        Why did you decide this? These ... (mumble!) Themselves do not participate in battles - they sit in warmth and peace behind a hillock, and from there they yap along cheat sheets!
    6. marlin1203
      marlin1203 4 February 2016 11: 34
      0
      We're the "peaceful" opposition and don't bomb ... laughing What kind of DAISH are they asking "like brothers"?
    7. orca77
      orca77 5 February 2016 04: 18
      +1
      Most likely they will be requested back after they realize that the curators threw them, like the previous ones. Only by that time the need for negotiations may no longer exist.
  2. The black
    The black 4 February 2016 06: 46
    16
    Yes and figs with them. In a month, half of these barmalei will not be alive, and the remaining will be much more accommodating
  3. V.ic
    V.ic 4 February 2016 06: 48
    16
    These "moderate" oppositionists cut off the heads of Syrian Christians yesterday. The loop cries over them.
    1. vell.65
      vell.65 4 February 2016 07: 33
      10
      Quote: V.ic
      These "moderate" oppositionists cut off the heads of Syrian Christians yesterday. The loop cries over them.

      It may be enough to make excuses to the mongrels and their trustees - hollow them to the complete exile, who has been fighting for Assad for a long time. am
  4. rov81
    rov81 4 February 2016 06: 49
    11
    To whom we must forgive everything, and who should forget we should not) Good riddance of this delegation!
  5. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 4 February 2016 06: 51
    +7
    Russia must stop bombing terrorists and, in general, from Syria. In short, you need to peck, peck and peck.
    And so it’s interesting, do these opposition members have a higher education, at least have a higher education?
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 4 February 2016 08: 08
      +6
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      And so it’s interesting, do these opposition members have a higher education, at least have a higher education?

      The character in the picture, Riyadh Hijab, degree Doctors of Philosophy in Agricultural Engineering (Wikipedia claims). Is that explain? Probably, when he bought a doctoral diploma, he did not carefully look at what he had boiled over? laughing
      1. cap
        cap 4 February 2016 08: 55
        0
        Ami du peuple "The character in the picture, Riyadh Hijab, degree Doctors of Philosophy in Agricultural Engineering (Wikipedia claims). Is that explain? Probably, when he bought a doctoral diploma, he did not carefully look at what he had boiled over? laughing[/ Quote]

        Discard the link. I’ll raise the mood. I haven’t laughed sincerely. laughing .
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 4 February 2016 09: 30
          +2
          Quote: cap
          Discard the link

          Yes please!
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B6%D0%B0%D0%B1,_%D0%A0%D0%B8

          %D1%8F%D0%B4_%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B4
          He even spent two weeks as prime minister of the SAR. Probably, while with his fake diploma did not burn laughing
          1. cap
            cap 4 February 2016 09: 52
            0
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            He even spent two weeks as prime minister of the SAR. Probably until laughing with his fake diploma


            And here is a whole list. "Soratnikov ".
            http://www.newsru.com/world/06aug2012/syr2.html
  6. antiexpert
    antiexpert 4 February 2016 06: 53
    35
    - How do you distinguish between ordinary terrorists and moderate ones during the bombing in Syria?
    The girl switched me to the duty officer, who very politely explained:
    - Even before the start of the military operation in Syria, a decisive decision was made at the General Staff of the Russian Defense Ministry. The essence of this decision is our traditional desire for Russia to strictly abide by the principles of legality and justice. So now, all of our ammunition is divided into two categories: ordinary and moderate. Against ordinary terrorists, we use exclusively conventional ammunition. And against moderate terrorists, we use exclusively moderate ammunition. So don’t worry, we take into account the moderation of some of the terrorists and treat them fairly.
    After these words, it became much easier for me. But I still clarified:
    “Do you really use mild ammunition against moderate terrorists, is that true ?!”
    The interlocutor replied:
    - The word of the Russian officer!
    I felt very good. To bring final clarity, I asked:
    - Tell me, how much do your conventional ammunition differ from the moderate ones?
    - Our conventional ammunition differs from moderate ammunition, exactly as much as ordinary terrorists in Syria, differ from moderate terrorists: they are painted with a different paint, in lighter and more moderate colors - the officer answered and hung up. "
    1. ovod84
      ovod84 4 February 2016 07: 45
      +1
      Well said straight to the point. Bravo comrade.
  7. Siberia55
    Siberia55 4 February 2016 06: 53
    +1
    It smelled fried !!!
  8. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 4 February 2016 06: 56
    +2
    About these opposing dead (future) - either good, or nothing but the truth! And on February 25, we must skillfully "breed" them into a scandal! )))
    We have every day counting! ;)))
    So much work to dispose of the moderate "opposition"!
  9. Para bellum
    Para bellum 4 February 2016 07: 01
    +8
    Well, since the Americans say that Russia should have stopped bombing, then we are doing everything right. We should have thrown them.
  10. izya top
    izya top 4 February 2016 07: 03
    +5
    the custodian also blurted out that Assad was to blame for the disruption of the negotiations. recourse
  11. Wolka
    Wolka 4 February 2016 07: 03
    +4
    just as there was no moderate opposition in Syria, it doesn’t exist either by definition or in fact, there are terrorist armed groups represented by ISIS and others like them, funded by the Persian Gulf countries, seized the national wealth of Syria and Iraq, established in the occupied territories terrorist regime of power. The anti-terrorist operation of the government army of the SAR and the Russian Aerospace Forces has a very specific goal of destroying these terrorist groups and spreading the regime of state legitimate power to the liberated territories and restoring full sovereignty to the entire territory of the SAR. Therefore, it is not necessary to generalize: borsch is all together soup, but soup separately, flies separately, and where there is moderate opposition.
  12. roman72-452
    roman72-452 4 February 2016 07: 09
    +3
    There is direct aggression in Syria from several neighboring countries, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, mostly foreigners are fighting, and the "moderate opposition" are corrupt clowns like ours. There is no one to negotiate with.
  13. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 4 February 2016 07: 14
    +6
    A "cunning" plan of striped ears and others like them begins to be drawn. Realizing that it is no longer possible to get into Syria directly, they act in such a difficult way - they say Russia is disrupting the negotiations, because it does not fulfill the demands of the barmaley to stop "pinching" them. Well, Assad is right there - why doesn't he stop cleansing his country of the bearded? Atu them ... And the fact that the demands are put forward in general by random teams of unknown who - so no one cares about it. It's just an excuse.
  14. Delink
    Delink 4 February 2016 07: 17
    +5
    Russia owes nothing to anyone !!!
    This Katz owes you! Here and deal with it!
    But we still need to succumb to the city, they’ll run faster to negotiations without any conditions. More precisely, on our terms, they will agree with everything.
  15. meriem1
    meriem1 4 February 2016 07: 19
    +3
    The lack of negotiations plays into the hands of the Aerospace Forces operation in Syria! We work wherever we think it is necessary! After all, there was no conversation and it is not possible to determine the "moderation" of the negotiators! All those with weapons and against the Syrian army are terrorists! To wet.
  16. 31rus
    31rus 4 February 2016 07: 33
    +5
    Dear, the condition of the ceasefire is one, a white flag and with raised hands, the surrender of arms and positions to the authorities of the SAR, in designated places and at a fixed time, a guarantee that the surrendered person will remain alive before trial
  17. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 4 February 2016 07: 41
    +3
    There is a legally elected government, those who are against arms are terrorists. And what color they do not paint, they will be terrorists, while holding weapons in their hands. Disarm, will be the opposition.
  18. Hooks
    Hooks 4 February 2016 07: 44
    +1
    What a formidable guy in the photo: “I hate it so much that I can’t kill for the third day!” (C). There is a war going on in Syria, and it has its own laws, including the one (quite cynical) that the winners are not judged. There was a case, we talked in Minsk. And did we want to negotiate a truce? We can only talk about surrender and a possible amnesty.
  19. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 February 2016 07: 45
    +3
    In unison, the French Foreign Minister crowed the Americans, saying that the Syrian government was to blame. All those who do not like the West are to blame, but they are ready to hug with bandits.
  20. jPilot
    jPilot 4 February 2016 07: 52
    +2
    Interestingly, this "moderate oppositionist" was specially found with such a menacing look. In the morning, in front of the mirror, he doesn't pee from his eyes !? lol let him smile more often and life will seem better. But seriously, who are they to demand the stop of the GOVERNMENT TROOPS, they generally understand the meaning of this word. How zadolbali these puppets, wave them in front of their nose "life-giving buck", they are happy to try to yapping howling ...
  21. Stinger
    Stinger 4 February 2016 08: 06
    +2
    Judging by the brutal face in the picture, it is very moderate.
  22. Nikolayev
    Nikolayev 4 February 2016 08: 14
    +2
    Negotiations only after the surrender and the surrender of weapons, both "moderate" and not so!
  23. ARES623
    ARES623 4 February 2016 08: 17
    +2
    Negotiations should be conducted with that part of the opposition that, with arms in hand, achieved this right in a joint struggle against IS. It is useless and immoral to talk with the "opposition" living in Paris or some other safe and well-fed place. How immoral and useless to seek allies among the "fathers" of the "Arab apocalypse". Today anyone can understand who is fighting in which trench and for whom.

    "Negotiations only after the surrender and the surrender of arms, both" moderate "and not so!"

    After surrender, negotiations are not conducted, they are only confronted with a fact or against the wall.
  24. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 4 February 2016 08: 24
    +3
    The US State Department immediately announced that Russia “had to go forward, and to start bombing with Damascus in full negotiations”
    Useless negotiations initially.
  25. atamankko
    atamankko 4 February 2016 08: 27
    +1
    The opposition acts on the principle of:
    "Tell me what I have to do and I will tell you why I can't."
  26. Bort radist
    Bort radist 4 February 2016 08: 28
    +1
    The other day, somewhere it flashed that the tactics of the Second World War were outdated. Everything ingenious is eternal. Drive into the cauldron, destroy or force to surrender, and then negotiations. No regrouping, no change of forces, no supply of ammunition under the guise of negotiations - "for the sake of peace, throughout the world."
  27. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 4 February 2016 08: 37
    +2
    We must step up efforts to liberate Syrian cities. Once they were indignant, then their masters understood that their plans were Khan. Whatever they croak, but after the victory of government forces, it turns out that the opposition does not enjoy any popular support, and indeed they are not the opposition, but a propaganda project.
    Something like our opposition — listen to Echo of Moscow, look at Navalny’s blog — the appearance of popular support has been directly created, but in reality they are not a political force in Russia and are a bunch of bloggers who regularly communicate with representatives of the American embassy.
    So is the Syrian "moderate opposition" - a bunch of office plankton representing foreign interests.
    Fighting is carried out by mercenary terrorists, which are pointless to divide into groups — sometimes they themselves do not know which group they belong to.
  28. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 4 February 2016 08: 47
    +3
    Something this very much resembles the situation after the Debaltsevsky and Ilovaisky cauldrons, then the same valiant warriors asked for a ceasefire such as peace, friendship, sausage, lemon, we will talk and lead friendship, just stop firing first. As a result, as soon as they pulled out the fifth point, they wave again with their fists. So what do you want the world gentlemen of the opposition then please be kind to the pitchfork in the sand and respectfully aside, then we will talk, and until then forgive me.
  29. Dart2027
    Dart2027 4 February 2016 08: 48
    +2
    Would anyone else be able to clearly say what this moderate opposition is?
    1. Bort radist
      Bort radist 4 February 2016 11: 52
      0
      Quote: Dart2027
      Still, someone could clearly say what this very diedWhat is the opposition?

      It is that which was, but died, for it seems to be there, but not to be found.
  30. Furious bambr
    Furious bambr 4 February 2016 08: 49
    +1
    As always: we must (though, they didn’t take anything from anyone), and America does not ask permission for a world hegemon. Even the opposition taught fingers to bend. It’s funny. For complete fun, you need to call Don Pedro Poroshenko, he likes to participate in negotiations, and his face is funnier when pouting from the importance
  31. nivander
    nivander 4 February 2016 08: 54
    +1
    it turns out the success of the negotiations depends on the mood of each individual chieftain and generally why Assad must negotiate separately with each Ottoman or Saudi six. It’s easier to put Erdagan’s son, a couple of senior princes from the oil monarchies and a lanky parrot from the State Department
  32. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 4 February 2016 08: 56
    0
    Quote: Tatiana
    It should be noted that the West’s hopes for a negotiation process are either illusory or provocative against Syria and Russia. Or a tactical move by opposition militants to regroup forces. Why?

    The fact is that the “Islamic State”, becoming a caliphate, is obliged to pursue its foreign policy according to the laws of Sunni Islam.

    So nobody seems to be negotiating with IS.
  33. drop
    drop 4 February 2016 09: 11
    +2
    Well, erysipelas in the photo. I have the honor.
  34. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 4 February 2016 09: 27
    +1
    Quote: jarome
    You need to put up with a crushed and crushed enemy.


    I completely agree. Flowers there on the mass grave, to remember an unkind word ...
  35. guzik007
    guzik007 4 February 2016 09: 34
    0
    Do the "oppositionists" know this "representative" by sight? Another CIA puncture - a real Arab will never wear a tie. For him, this is a "western stranglehold." This one, has been living in the west for a long time, with American money, so the slegontsa has pierced. I did not take into account the specifics.
  36. dmitrymb
    dmitrymb 4 February 2016 09: 42
    0
    These are not Syrians, these are adroit traitors!
  37. kg pv
    kg pv 4 February 2016 09: 49
    0
    And if it is known that in the ranks of their delegation are representatives of terrorist groups, then why the hell were they not arrested ????? !!!! am
  38. Vladimir 23rus
    Vladimir 23rus 4 February 2016 09: 53
    0
    And the second pretext that they cannot participate in the negotiations, since the aggravated humanitarian situation in Syria does not allow this, is also untenable
    With such a ryah, it’s necessary to remain silent about humanitarian aid in Syria.
  39. triglav
    triglav 4 February 2016 09: 53
    +1
    US State Department spokesman John Kirby said that "the bombing of civilian targets had an impact on the peace process, and Russia had to stop the operation."

    This moron can only be answered in profanity. And Bashar needs to tell the "American coalition" that it is operating in Syria illegally and they would all go out. We cannot give away Syria to these "partners" in any way!
  40. KnightRider
    KnightRider 4 February 2016 10: 10
    +1
    Well that's just wonderful! Now we can safely bomb Ishil, al-Qaeda and other "opposition" except for the one that cooperates with us until February 25. And by that time, Assad's positions will become even stronger, and the "opposition" will no longer have time for ultimatums, I think ... soldier
  41. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 4 February 2016 10: 34
    +2
    They simply proved that the so-called delegation is not such. This is a bunch of hastily assembled and prikupennyh (Aniskin laughing ) scattered terrorists, representing no one and controlled from outside.
  42. Zheka40
    Zheka40 4 February 2016 10: 49
    +1
    Finish !!! And then you can talk.
  43. tomcat117
    tomcat117 4 February 2016 11: 34
    +3
    From the photograph of the "formidable dzhamshut" one can conclude that this very representative of the Yer-Riyadov "moderate opposition" is the most democratic of all the radiant ones.