Military Review

Polish concept tank PL-01 (photo gallery)

137

Concept tank The futuristic look was first shown several years ago. And the work is in full swing. However, there are rumors that a fully functional version may be ready in 2016. This article does not claim to be a detailed technical description of the conceptual model, let's just admire the creation of Polish engineering - the concept tank PL-01.







PL-01 is a Polish armored fighting vehicle based on the Swedish light tank CV90 / 120-T, created by OBRUM with the support of the British BAE Systems.

The concept tank PL-01 is developed jointly by the Polish company Obrum and the British company BAE Systems. Development began in 2013. The layout of the new tank was first shown to the public in the same year. Currently, this tank is only a technological demonstration model. A fully functional prototype machine must be made in 2016 year. This tank is designed to meet the possible needs of the Polish army. Some sources have reported that this tank could enter service in the 2018 year. Currently, the Polish army operates around 900 main battle tanks, including the PT-91 Twardy and Leopard 2. Also on long-term storage are about 400 OBT T-72. After the start of serial production, the PL-01 tank will also be offered to foreign customers.



Polish concept tank PL-01 (photo gallery)

The main weapon of the new PL-01 tank is the 105 caliber mm or 120 mm gun installed in an uninhabited turret in accordance with NATO standards. The gun will be capable of firing both conventional ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. Automatic loader provides a rate of 6 shots per minute. Combat is 45 shots, of which 16 ready for firing shells are placed in the slots inside the tower, the remaining ammunition stacked inside the chassis. The tank is also armed with an 7,62-mm machine gun UKM-2000C with 1000 ammunition ammunition.


In the remotely controlled combat module can be installed various weapons systems and protection. At the moment, the project provides for the installation of 7,62-mm or 12,7-mm machine gun or 40-mm automatic grenade launcher with 750 ammunition caliber 7,62 mm, 400 caliber 12,7 mm or 96 grenade 40 mm. An active defense system was also installed to intercept missiles, and smoke grenade launchers are built into the tower.









































Materials used:
www.thebrigade.com
www.baesystems.com
www.wikipedia.org
Telegraf.com.ua
www.obrum.gliwice.pl
137 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 5 February 2016 06: 16
    44
    The so-called "road tank" with narrow tracks that do not allow driving through the field after rain, and the low ground clearance guarantees the car that it will get stuck in our swamps completely. In addition, the onboard cursing protecting the chassis also deprives the car of maneuverability when driving on rugged terrain .. ...
    1. corporal
      corporal 5 February 2016 06: 37
      +7
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      narrow caterpillars

      In the photo, it’s not much narrower than the 55s.
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 5 February 2016 07: 14
        35
        But the side screens reach the bottom rim of the rollers. On the cross-country roads in bad weather you can forget.
        1. Conductor
          Conductor 5 February 2016 13: 52
          +3
          Quote: inkass_98
          But the side screens reach the bottom rim of the rollers. On the cross-country roads in bad weather you can forget.


          I think that the Polish designers are not stupid and have come up with something about this problem. The width of the caterpillars is also in order. The uninhabited tower is actual. But for what tasks is this technique being created? There’s no 105-120 mm stock reserve for the future, booking- God forbid that 30 mm in all projections held
          Base Swede CV90-120 (BMP with gun)

          And when the Poles release the first batch, then we'll see if it's "peremog" or not
      2. Aleksandr72
        Aleksandr72 5 February 2016 07: 23
        39
        So along the way this is the T-55 in the new body kit dress (it’s good if the body kit is at least made of tin, not plastic or cardboard!) laughing
        Well this is a joke of humor. But seriously ... Without looking at it and discussing it seriously is impossible. Pshek turned out to be a creative little car - even now shoot in the next sequel to Star Wars - just an imperial armored vehicle, where there is a Russian "Armata". This is the real future of the tank, the main path for the development of armored vehicles! belay
        I have the honor.
        1. ILDM1986
          ILDM1986 5 February 2016 08: 39
          +5
          clearance and narrow tracks are certainly a weak point, but the engine power of 940 horses per 35 tons of weight compensates for this shortcoming (if the weight data correspond to reality, the model, as I understand it, is not yet serial, it may "get fat"). armor is correspondingly weak, but there are KAZ and technologies to reduce the visibility. installed detectors of laser radiation, radar, all-round cameras. The wiki also says about the troop compartment for 4 people, in principle it is possible given that the prototype was not the T-55 but the CV90 BMP.
          1. vvp2412
            vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 01
            +9
            on the role of BMP somehow pulls, but not a tank!
            1. Pirogov
              Pirogov 5 February 2016 11: 47
              +4
              on the role of BMP somehow pulls, but not a tank! ...................................... .....................................
              ........................ As for me and the BMP does not pull, so a museum exhibit.
            2. Remy_Argo
              Remy_Argo 6 February 2016 19: 47
              0
              Quote: vvp2412
              on the role of BMP somehow pulls, but not a tank!

              agree! ours is better ...
          2. DarkRiver
            DarkRiver 6 February 2016 02: 03
            +4
            You don’t understand anything in Polish military thought, this is a Polish CAVALERY tank.
          3. avdkrd
            avdkrd 6 February 2016 14: 35
            +2
            Quote: ILDM1986
            clearance and narrow tracks of course a weak spot

            what are you really clinging to clearance? The clearance corresponds to the donor CV90, and she had no problems with patency. Of course you should not expect from this machine all-terrain at the level of Russian tanks, but this is not a SUV. It’s quite a tank for a European theater. The level of armor is definitely not lower than the same T-55. We have on a much lighter BMP-3 achieved protection against RPG-7 due to dz. The Polish body kit assumes an integrated DZ, if you add a workable KAZ to this, then security will be no worse than that of the T-72, or even better. The automatic loader with a rate of 6 rounds per minute, especially with a 105mm gun, raises questions, but overall the design looks viable. The question of price remains - something tells me that it will be at the level of Almaty.
        2. yushch
          yushch 5 February 2016 09: 33
          +7
          [quote = Aleksandr72] So along the way this is the T-55 in a new dress-kit (it’s good if the kit is at least made of tin, not plastic or cardboard!) laughing

          By the way, my first thought was similar to yours, but then I saw that the T-55 with the tower only reached the base of the tower of this miracle and realized that it would be a very noticeable target in height. And if you really make a similar upgrade to the T-55, then it will be much more effective than this model.
          1. the47th
            the47th 5 February 2016 09: 45
            +9
            It has been done for a long time, only it turned out nobody needs it:
            1. mvg
              mvg 5 February 2016 16: 20
              +1
              It has been done for a long time, only it turned out nobody needs it:

              We know how to count rinks? Why would it be 55?
              1. the47th
                the47th 5 February 2016 17: 51
                +4
                Since when is the number of track rollers an unshakable feature of the platform? ZSU-57-2, for example, built on the platform of the T-54 had 4 road wheels each. It is immediately evident that the front track roller is different (and more specifically from the T-72). The installation of a 125-mm gun with AZ required the installation of an additional pair of rollers. In addition, the frontal armor of the hull is layered and much thicker. By the way, this is the T-55M6 project.
                1. wanderer_032
                  wanderer_032 29 February 2016 07: 22
                  0
                  Quote: the47th
                  It is immediately clear that the front track roller is different (and more specifically from the T-72).


                  No, not from 72, but from the T-80. wink
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 5 February 2016 10: 05
            +5
            Anti-tank missiles do not care what height the machine will be - in the future, almost all missiles will be hit from above.
            1. yushch
              yushch 5 February 2016 11: 55
              +4
              Quote: Vadim237
              Anti-tank missiles do not care what height the machine will be - in the future, almost all missiles will be hit from above.


              For a missile to hit a target, it must first be pointed. An ATGM operator, for example, where would it be easier to point and hold a missile, as you think? Or a simple fighter with a grenade launcher, where it will be easier to get?
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 5 February 2016 13: 40
                +3
                Now there are such ATGMs - I shot and forgot which drones can direct - everything can be seen from above - and this is already today.
                1. yushch
                  yushch 5 February 2016 14: 20
                  +3
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  Now there are such ATGMs - I shot and forgot which drones can direct - everything can be seen from above - and this is already today.


                  I completely agree with you, but this will only work in a war with a technically "advanced" enemy, and as practice shows, basically conflicts take place with a technologically "backward" enemy.
                2. uwzek
                  uwzek 5 February 2016 18: 03
                  +2
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  Now there are such ATGMs - I shot and forgot which drones can direct - everything can be seen from above - and this is already today.

                  So this cameraman shot and forgot. A racket will hit or not, the question is very open. An even more difficult question is whether the racket will hit the target when it hits.
                  And drones are easily blocked by electronic warfare.
        3. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 5 February 2016 12: 06
          -2
          So it is, based on the T-55 was created yes
        4. Nross
          Nross 5 February 2016 19: 26
          +2
          And here I agree: it makes an impression if not a cardboard copy, then out of tin or something like that. Although the concept is a concept. Negroes will star in star wars, they will spit out the witty Poles - they will have armor in addition to the chassis.

          It looks cool, but you should not vouch for the performance characteristics.
          To suppress the uprisings of their own population-the very thing is a machine ....
      3. vvp2412
        vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 00
        +3
        Take a closer look! Already! And 20-30% you know a lot!
      4. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 5 February 2016 12: 04
        0
        So it is built on a hodovka from 55 matches, in general, not already, this is an illusory effect due to the body kit. I probably read about him a year ago ... Apparently they added electronics, servos and again showed.
        1. uwzek
          uwzek 5 February 2016 18: 06
          +1
          Quote: Observer 33
          So it is built on a hodovka from 55 matches, in general, not already, this is an illusory effect due to the body kit. I probably read about him a year ago ... Apparently they added electronics, servos and again showed.

          So, if the tower is uninhabited, then where do you put the crew on the T-55? About the servos and electronics generally silent ...
        2. avdkrd
          avdkrd 9 February 2016 00: 11
          0
          Quote: Observer 33
          So it is built on a hodovka from 55 matches, in general, not already, this is an illusory effect due to the body kit. I probably read about him a year ago ... Apparently they added electronics, servos and again showed.

          I don’t know where you read, but it is built on the basis of the CV90 BMP (from the word for sure), with a front-mounted MTO.
    2. Misha Honest
      Misha Honest 5 February 2016 07: 52
      +5
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      The so-called "road tank" with narrow tracks that do not allow driving through the field after rain, and the low ground clearance guarantees the car that it will get stuck in our swamps completely. In addition, the onboard cursing protecting the chassis also deprives the car of maneuverability when driving on rugged terrain .. ...

      From the article:
      This tank is designed to meet the possible needs of the Polish army.

      Are they going to juggle him? laughing Otherwise, why is it still needed?
      1. amirbek
        amirbek 5 February 2016 07: 57
        +5
        and what is it sticking out in front ... chtoli blaster?
    3. Alez
      Alez 5 February 2016 08: 36
      12
      Not enough xenon, panoramic roof and bottom lights. It looks futuristic, but how it will prove to be in combat conditions. It is unclear even how they will reload the ammunition, change tracks, where active dynamic protection. In World War II, British tanks were delivered to the USSR with closed sides, which could not drive off-road, trucks were clogged with dirt.
      1. Bath
        Bath 5 February 2016 09: 58
        +9
        Quote: Alez
        Not enough xenon, panoramic roof and bottom lights. It looks futuristic, but how it will prove to be in combat conditions. It is unclear even how they will reload the ammunition, change tracks, where active dynamic protection. In World War II, British tanks were delivered to the USSR with closed sides, which could not drive off-road, trucks were clogged with dirt.

        and then forgot about tinting and most importantly do not slam the doors hard, otherwise the radio tape recorder will shake
      2. mvg
        mvg 5 February 2016 16: 27
        0
        In World War II, British tanks were delivered to the USSR with closed sides, which could not drive off-road, trucks were clogged with dirt.

        Prev The Church of England and Matilda were cool, well-protected combat vehicles. Reliable and comfortable (unlike the early T-34, T-28, KV). The only significant drawback is the weak high-explosive fragmentation shell. 40-57 mm guns - clearly not what Dr. Guderian ordered.
        Many tankers remained loyal to the same infantry Matilda until the end of the war.
        It was just that they were few, unlike the T-34s, which were built in thousands per month. 40000 teshek .. for comparison, the Tigers were built less than 2000 pieces
    4. avva2012
      avva2012 5 February 2016 08: 45
      +8
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus The so-called "road tank"

      Well, the side lights! did not forget to deliver. Headlights are generally a miracle, any Lexus will be jealous. And, so the feeling that the tank is in the tank, "matryoshka", damn it.
      1. screw cutter
        screw cutter 5 February 2016 12: 00
        +3
        And I had the same feeling, to give this miracle from "Shilka" you look and 55ka will appear, although 35 tons are declared there ...
      2. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 5 February 2016 13: 08
        +7
        A couple of observations:
        1. A third of the photographs has a mirror-mounted arrangement of the tower machine gun’s power tape and the sensor holes on the front of the tower. That is, photos for the quantity are shown repeatedly, but mirrored.
        2. With an uninhabited tower, in some photos where the upper projection of the tank is visible, I tried to find hatches for the WHOLE crew. Where are they? Or does everyone climb through a single driver’s hatch?
        1. ILDM1986
          ILDM1986 7 February 2016 11: 00
          +1
          there is a hatch in the back. through it and climb. just like a "carrot" fellow
        2. avdkrd
          avdkrd 9 February 2016 00: 16
          0
          Quote: abrakadabre
          . With an uninhabited tower, in some photos where the upper projection of the tank is visible, I tried to find hatches for the WHOLE crew. Where are they? Or does everyone climb through a single driver’s hatch?

          In principle, the hatch made in the form of a ramp opening up and down is visible on the rear photo. The machine is made on the basis of the CV-90 BMP with a front MTO and has a significantly larger body height compared to the T-55.
    5. Voice of the Mind
      Voice of the Mind 5 February 2016 11: 43
      +1
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      The so-called "road tank" with narrow tracks that do not allow to drive through the field after rain

      Oh well) chassis from the Swedish CV90 BMP. The Poles creatively reworked the Swedish 2007 concept CV90120-T.
      Recycled very funny, the tank seemed to be off the pages of a fantastic cartoon
    6. mihai_md2003
      mihai_md2003 6 February 2016 02: 16
      0
      I agree to all 100, it rushes not even to the specialist to whom I refer myself. Apparently a tank for European open spaces. Tears from the autobahn and all
  2. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 5 February 2016 06: 17
    18
    will go for a new film by Fedi Bondarchuk, such as "inhabited island" - negative but not good for anything else ... argue the miners, why this "SUV" will do ... except for the parade in Warsaw ..
    1. vvp2412
      vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 04
      +1
      At the independence parade at KaKloV!
    2. avdkrd
      avdkrd 9 February 2016 01: 19
      +1
      Minus bad manners in the dispute. I will try to argue the viability of the Polish gloomy genius and at the same time justify the meaninglessness. The main criticism on the forum concerns the chassis and this is not correct, like kakly about the Armata, without argumentation. The vehicle is based on the British CV-90 BMP. Nobody blamed the donor car for its low cross-country ability and mobility, although the weight of advanced modifications (Mk lll) reaches 35 tons. The Poles also announced 35 tons in maximum configuration and 30 tons in standard configuration. The weight is comparable to the main tank. Considering the larger reserve volume, it seems to be not good, but we must take into account that the tower of the Pole is much lighter (the same T-55), despite its futuristic appearance, in fact, it is a spaced reservation with (possibly) built-in DZ, since it only protects the breech of the gun and AZ, not the crew. The Poles announced a modular ceramic-aramid coating, which suggests an advantage over conventional armor, I don't know what it is eaten with, but the use of a built-in remote sensing device looks more logical (which was the same, but there are no details), probably even in the side screens, plus KAZ. Poland has experience in deep modernization of tanks, and if everything laid down by the ideologists of this project works, then the tank's security will be at a high level. It is difficult to judge what kind of built-in remote sensing and KAZ the Poles will use. It is not necessary to rely on our own Polish systems (especially the KAZ developed jointly with Ukraine), but there are workable samples in the world. In general - "from the world on a nut - to the Pole a tank."
      As a summary to the technical part, I can say (on my own) that the PL-01 will definitely be no worse than the T-55 with which it was rolled out to the bride and allowing a workable KAZ and with a 120 mm cannon, it can even spar with the T-72 with T-90 early releases (still modern SLAs and awareness). At the same time, all PL-01 does not pull on the main tank, the frontal armor in the front MTO even in Merkava is not rational in weight in comparison with the classics. Armata T-15 has a completely different solution for frontal reservation.
      But now the second question is - was it worth the fence? The CV90 price of Norway’s BAE Systems sold in 2015 amounted to $ 9 million 28 tons. How much will the PL-01 with the declared bells and whistles cost, even scary to think, especially considering that there is no own electronics and KAZ. Honestly - it would be better to engage in deep modernization of the T-72, which they have enough.
  3. Waltasar
    Waltasar 5 February 2016 06: 19
    10
    As a machine for show and advertising the Polish military-industrial complex is good, handsome.
    As a tank, let's see, everything depends on the implementation.
    1. oblako
      oblako 5 February 2016 07: 02
      11
      The design is modern with "stealth" claims, an uninhabited tower, the sides are well protected, apparently, but the main thing, of course, is the filling - nothing is known about it, but I am tormented by vague doubts ... it will not be bad. Nice move in the constructors battle. Most likely the crew is downsized. With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot. The Swedes are good designers, and in Poland the school is not weak either. I think we will have a different standard for the European war. He's a crossover, of course. But each car is created for its own theater of operations or for sale. "Merkava" is an example. We need to learn how to beat ...
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 5 February 2016 09: 20
        +4
        Quote: oblako
        We need to learn how to beat ..

        Better on top, there the armor is thinner.
      2. vvp2412
        vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 06
        +2
        Yeah. Stealth technology ... Probably want to teach flying like an F-117
  4. corporal
    corporal 5 February 2016 06: 30
    +3
    On this concept have already been walked repeatedly. From approval to trampling in guano. So the author did not show anything new. request

    What I think of this concept:
    1. If it is equipped with electronics at the level of a 5th generation fighter, yes with the function of "God's gaze".
    2. KAZ at the level of "Windbreaker" at least.
    3. New armor that can hold the BOPS of the latest generations from all angles.
    Yes, such a handsome man will be a new word in tank building good
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 5 February 2016 06: 42
      +6
      Quote: Corporal
      such a handsome man will be a new word in tank building

      what is "new"? an uninhabited tower, we have already embodied, futuristic forms and that's it!
      1. corporal
        corporal 5 February 2016 06: 50
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        what's new"? futuristic shapes and that's it!

        Well, I explained:
        Quote: Corporal
        1. If it is equipped with electronics at the level of a 5th generation fighter, yes with the function of "God's gaze".
        2. KAZ at the level of "Windbreaker" at least.
        3. New armor that can hold the BOPS of the latest generations from all angles.

        What form? The eye pleases. Not only do airplanes be beautiful. wink
        1. vvp2412
          vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 07
          +4
          Probably, the f-117 was also first developed as a tank ... But it was taught to fly! :)
          This one also needs to be taught to fly! :)
      2. Maksus
        Maksus 5 February 2016 08: 08
        20
        Hanging the CV-90 with a bunch of carbon-like plastic and pulling the "Kruban" casing over the cannon - that's the whole Polish engineering idea. And yes, even diode stopar and daytime running lights. This thing is a normal BMP with only a large cannon. Tracked Centaur or SGM Striker.
    2. Chicot 1
      Chicot 1 5 February 2016 13: 19
      +2
      Quote: Corporal
      1. If it is equipped with electronics at the level of a 5th generation fighter, yes with the function of "God's gaze".
      2. KAZ at the level of "Windbreaker" at least.
      3. New armor that can hold the latest generation BOPS from all angles

      If ... If ... If ...
      Quote: Corporal
      such a handsome man will be

      Do not drink water from the beauty ...
      Quote: Corporal
      will be a new word in tank building

      But will he be at all? ..
  5. Bosk
    Bosk 5 February 2016 06: 32
    +7
    As I understand it now, tanks must pass the test in a wind tunnel?
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 5 February 2016 07: 03
      +2
      Quote: Bosk
      As I understand it now, tanks must pass the test in a wind tunnel?

      No, what does it have to do with ... This form is caused by the need to reduce radar visibility for side-view radars and radars with a mode of mapping and target selection, which are usually in the range.
      1. screw cutter
        screw cutter 5 February 2016 12: 10
        +4
        "This form is caused by the need to reduce RL"
        Well then, the machine gunner does not at all fit in with this concept, they could have stuck it with something, it spoils all the beauty.
        Is he interested in pneumatic suspension? Otherwise, on loose soil he will hang on the side screens.
  6. alex-cn
    alex-cn 5 February 2016 06: 32
    +6
    why did they decide to compare it with the t-55? really does not pull on more? although if a 105 mm gun is possible
  7. Titanumide
    Titanumide 5 February 2016 06: 38
    -4
    Handsome tank.
    1. Homo
      Homo 5 February 2016 08: 07
      +7
      Quote: Titanumide
      Handsome tank.

      Where did you see the tank? Beautiful model.
  8. tchoni
    tchoni 5 February 2016 06: 41
    +4
    a kind of Polish vision of the tank of the future. Apparently, the pans are counting on the serious export potential of this device.
    Personally, I am intrigued by one thing in this entire development: how is the automatic charging replenished? and how is the crew placed?
  9. Fenia04
    Fenia04 5 February 2016 06: 49
    +1
    It looks futuristic, and even beautiful in its own way. True, there are so many questions about the performance characteristics and armor (especially about it).
    Let’s see what appears in the future about this miracle device.
  10. Gavril
    Gavril 5 February 2016 06: 58
    +4
    In the opinion, as they say, stylish, fashionable, youth ... Give the characteristics, cost, then it will be possible to evaluate.
  11. Mera joota
    Mera joota 5 February 2016 06: 59
    +7
    As far as I understand, PL-01 appeared as a result of adapting the CV90105 to the customer. Quite an interesting car, given that the CV-90 base has already earned respect and is in demand. If this is a series of machines for various purposes, then my respect to the Poles, or rather the Swedes from BAE Systems Hagglunds
    CV90105 itself

    1. ziama
      ziama 5 February 2016 09: 27
      +5
      PL-01 appeared as an adaptation of the light tank CV90120-T to the customer. All that has changed in it since 1998 is armor and guns. Initially, a 105-mm rifled gun was installed on it, then a 120-mm Swedish L50 gun manufactured by RUAG Land Systems, in 2010 developed the concept tank CV90120-T Adaptiv with a 120-mm German gun Rheinmetall Rh120 LLR L / 47. Adaptive armor seems a little expensive for the Poles, so it was redone, everything else, including the gun, went unchanged from the CV90120-T Adaptiv.
  12. La-5
    La-5 5 February 2016 07: 14
    +2
    A Soviet machine gun, probably the automatic loader from the T-72 adapted. yes
  13. qwert
    qwert 5 February 2016 07: 22
    19
    If you believe Rezun, then since Poland has created a "Road Tank", then it plans to occupy all of Europe))))
  14. Gsxr1300rr
    Gsxr1300rr 5 February 2016 07: 34
    +2
    This is serious, impressive (I'm talking about the NSW on the tower)
  15. the47th
    the47th 5 February 2016 07: 40
    +7
    The characteristic appearance of the T-14 is due to the built-in, and not mounted, dynamic protection. But what determines the appearance of the PL-01, I can not understand? The fact that this is not a built-in remote sensing is visible.
    into an uninhabited tower in accordance with NATO standards.

    The parent CV90105 has an engine to the right of the driver. I wonder where the Poles put the gunner and the commander? Either there is a crew of one person, or the gunner and commander are sitting in an "uninhabited tower".
  16. Free wind
    Free wind 5 February 2016 07: 55
    +4
    And on one of the photos, on the machine gun, the price tag hangs, probably a Chinese machine gun, in case of failure it will be possible to hand over under the guarantee, you still need to save the check wink . And so a beautiful car and this is not the main tank, remember. the Poles talk about it, it's a light tank. no need to compare it with something, it has its own niche. On this machine, the engine is German MTV, and in the pictures our V -shki
    1. 2s1122
      2s1122 5 February 2016 17: 05
      +1
      Its a niche, only women are cropping. Type sit down my darling with a breeze I will pump over. laughing
      And if without jokes, then this miracle will not cost cheaply judging by its appearance.
      Wedge heels pure for the parade bully
    2. uwzek
      uwzek 5 February 2016 18: 16
      +1
      Quote: Free Wind
      Surely a Chinese machine gun

      It is quite possible that the Kazakh machine gun. They make "cliffs" there.
  17. james
    james 5 February 2016 08: 08
    +4
    They are positioned as light, but the dimensions are larger than the MBT. And why such a huge tower, if it is uninhabited?
    1. the47th
      the47th 5 February 2016 09: 20
      15
      The Ukrainians will be put there, and since the Ukrainians for the Poles are "not people", then the tower is "uninhabited". wink
    2. avdkrd
      avdkrd 9 February 2016 01: 37
      0
      Quote: james
      They are positioned as light, but the dimensions are larger than the MBT. And why such a huge tower, if it is uninhabited?

      In general, the Poles position it as the main one. If it is light, then it would be in the cashier. It really stands as heavy. According to Wikipedia, the Korean K-2 "Black Panther" is the most expensive tank in the world $ 8.5 million, and only the donor CV-90 (cost Norway in 2015) costs $ 9.28 million .. The question is what is the most expensive tank in the world?
      The tower is small by the way, given the AZ in the niche.
  18. bracket
    bracket 5 February 2016 08: 21
    +7
    Quote: oblako
    With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot.

    what's behind these conclusions? in appearance? What kind of theater? The gun is not clear which 105 or 120 (it will already be too small). And what kind of logs is the SCHOOL of tank building, explain.
    1. vvp2412
      vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 11
      +7
      how what? :) Upgrade of Soviet tanks! :)
      Well, there to stick the spoilers, put mud flaps, change the name! :)
  19. Riv
    Riv 5 February 2016 08: 47
    +2
    In my inexperienced view: the body kit is extremely vulnerable even to small arms fire, and the tracks are too narrow for serious weight. And that I’m not very sure that it will fit two people ...
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 5 February 2016 09: 25
      +3
      Quote: Riv
      I’m not very sure that it will fit two people ...

      He’s not so small, at 55 they fit what
      1. Riv
        Riv 5 February 2016 10: 46
        +1
        But at 55m only the driver is in front.
        1. avdkrd
          avdkrd 9 February 2016 01: 39
          0
          Quote: Riv
          But at 55m only the driver is in front.

          here is the same in front, to the left of the engine, it’s just not clear where the exhaust is from the Pole. The engine is exactly right like the CV-90.
  20. Hammer
    Hammer 5 February 2016 09: 02
    12
    The original Cv-90 can withstand 30mm BOPS in the forehead. Very little for a tank. This means that you will have to radically increase the protection, which in turn will lead to an increase in mass, and this means that inevitably it will be necessary to strengthen the suspension and 100% change the engine to a more powerful one. Installation of a powerful dvigla, change the overall dimensions of the machine. All of the above means that the Poles not only have no tank, but even the concept does not correspond to a hypothetical real machine. And if you do not increase the armor, then you can use it only as a light tank, such as our octopus. Then there’s no need to talk about any competition with real tanks. These are the lesser problems that I saw from the photographs.
    1. vvp2412
      vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 15
      +1
      Octopus SD is a floating light tank. More precisely, a self-propelled anti-tank gun! Dynamics at the BMD-3 level. Comparison like horseradish with a finger. Well, if only armor can be compared. But not in combat qualities.
  21. Wolka
    Wolka 5 February 2016 09: 04
    +3
    a very controversial concept, for example, its powerful medieval knightly armored body kit for a gun with an uninhabited tower, as well as sides, causes some embarrassment in such expediency, in the presence of a small clearance and narrow tracks ...
  22. Shuhrat
    Shuhrat 5 February 2016 09: 04
    +2
    The front tank is no more.
  23. 76rtbr
    76rtbr 5 February 2016 09: 10
    +6
    and what is the concept, they pulled the casing on the old "tractor", even the rollers were closed, so as not to immediately determine the type of "tractor" and are happy to the back seat !!
  24. Mercenary
    Mercenary 5 February 2016 09: 11
    +5
    Body kit in the tradition of Western Futurism! It's hard to say about the ability of armor, but the tank’s ass asks for an RPG-7, (cheap and cheerful), a niche that is comfortable before, and if, to its surprise, it doesn’t break through, it will jam the tower. And LED flashlights will not help.
  25. Freeman
    Freeman 5 February 2016 09: 34
    +3
    Quote: Gavril
    In the opinion, as they say, stylish, fashionable, youth ... Give the characteristics, cost, then it will be possible to evaluate.

    Quote: oblako
    The design is modern ..... With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot.

    Well, the main "chip" has already been shown to you. "The" gadget "is able to make" selfies "in the mirror. laughing
    1. vvp2412
      vvp2412 5 February 2016 10: 17
      +3
      I wish you could still control it through a smartphone, like a kettle or boiler! :)
  26. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 5 February 2016 09: 36
    0
    Looks handsome, you can’t say anything. Let's see what happens in the end.
  27. Freeman
    Freeman 5 February 2016 09: 39
    +3
    Quote: Staffa
    Quote: oblako
    With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot.

    what's behind these conclusions? in appearance? What kind of theater? The gun is not clear which 105 or 120 (it will already be too small). And what kind of logs is the SCHOOL of tank building, explain.

    Why all this? The main thing now is to "settle" patent issues with Samsung and Apple. laughing
  28. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets 5 February 2016 09: 52
    +2
    It looks futuristic
  29. Vadim237
    Vadim237 5 February 2016 10: 12
    +1
    And this tank has a rear ramp like Merkava.
  30. R_D_V
    R_D_V 5 February 2016 10: 17
    +4
    It’s going to go up in the parade;
    1. Army soldier2
      Army soldier2 5 February 2016 10: 52
      +1
      Dear, how can you draw conclusions on the model without knowing which performance characteristics are going to invest in it?
      1. Mikhail Zhukov
        Mikhail Zhukov 4 August 2019 08: 16
        0
        Yes, no TTX are not going to invest in it, purely PR
  31. Ingvvar08
    Ingvvar08 5 February 2016 10: 19
    +4
    Tank PL-01 is the first "Parquet" tank. We are waiting for the first "Road".
  32. Engineer
    Engineer 5 February 2016 10: 21
    +3
    What hype raised around this plastic bmp overgrown with drin? The Poles did not make a combat vehicle, but the scenery for the film in the Hollywood style. Our people, as always, look at the wrapper, but do not sniff what kind of city is wrapped in it.
  33. Termit1309
    Termit1309 5 February 2016 11: 19
    +4
    Very beautiful layout. And the photos are beautiful. But how does this relate to tank building?
  34. adma
    adma 5 February 2016 11: 20
    +4
    And why it is compared with the T-55, if it is positioned as the latest model of BTT. It was more logical, at least with the T-72 ... And why in the turret a NSVT machine gun? But what about the NATO standard?
    1. Jackking
      Jackking 5 February 2016 12: 01
      +3
      The NATO standard still needs to be bought for grandmas, and the mountains of Russian arms remain. But the question arises - if they could not even make a machine gun, then what kind of tank can we talk about :)
  35. uskrabut
    uskrabut 5 February 2016 11: 20
    +2
    Judging by the dimensions, the places in it dohrenisha, you can take the girls on a hike. One question torments: what is this thing made of? If made of steel, how much does it weigh. If it’s made of plastic, then how to fight on it - you can demolish the entire body kit from a shotgun.
  36. oleggun
    oleggun 5 February 2016 11: 27
    +3
    And what does RPG-7 think about this?)))
  37. Resistance
    Resistance 5 February 2016 11: 30
    +3
    I could not understand why he had a trim on his nose, and then he saw a photo where a guy pulled his hand down the trunk. In fell into place
    1. uwzek
      uwzek 5 February 2016 18: 24
      +1
      Quote: Persistence
      Then I saw a photo where a guy pulled the barrel down with his hand. In fell into place

      Any tank gun is hung in the trunnions. If you open it up, a child can swing it (he just doesn’t have enough hands). Otherwise, the stabilizer will have to be made very powerful.
  38. Amatar
    Amatar 5 February 2016 11: 31
    +1
    Handsome man! On such a ride to work, girls ride, and not fight.
  39. gla172
    gla172 5 February 2016 11: 32
    +2
    The gap between the tower and the hull, it seems to me the kinetic shells when it gets there, will remove the turret, it’s just that the shell asks for it.
  40. General_colonel
    General_colonel 5 February 2016 11: 48
    +8
    This tank needs chrome wheels and a spoiler
  41. Jackking
    Jackking 5 February 2016 11: 59
    +3
    The Polish tank is an oxymoron :)))
  42. holgert
    holgert 5 February 2016 12: 34
    +2
    A great target ---- it’s next to the T-55th, like a down - overgrowth ....
  43. Freeman
    Freeman 5 February 2016 12: 37
    +2
    Quote: qwert
    If you believe Rezun, then since Poland has created a "Road Tank", then it plans to occupy all of Europe))))

    Exactly all, including England, even the "prul" was created for this, for roads with left-hand traffic. belay
  44. Black
    Black 5 February 2016 12: 56
    +2
    ... well, cool crossover. will they sell in a mortgage?
  45. dima-fesko
    dima-fesko 5 February 2016 14: 07
    +3
    If my Moskvich 2140 (with all due respect) is hung with spoilers, moldings, and other restaylengs, and put next to a "chick in a bikini" - will go for a boomer!
  46. UNAUTHORIZED
    UNAUTHORIZED 5 February 2016 14: 12
    +3
    For the next series of Bond, it will do
  47. Titanumide
    Titanumide 5 February 2016 14: 30
    +1
    He would see him in the battlefield. The guide will be brought to mind. And what is his armor. Can flying objects be knocked down?
    1. uwzek
      uwzek 5 February 2016 18: 26
      +3
      Quote: Titanumide
      Can flying objects be knocked down?

      Of course. Unexpected jumps.
  48. pavelty
    pavelty 5 February 2016 15: 01
    +2
    What does he have there stop signals in photo 2?))
  49. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 5 February 2016 15: 28
    +3
    Poland and the concept tanks are incompatible.
    1. gla172
      gla172 5 February 2016 16: 25
      +2
      Quote: Dimon19661
      Poland and the concept tanks are incompatible.


      Well, yes, it's worth remembering World War II, as they rushed to the German "steel blitzkrieg" with cavalry ....
  50. Alexez
    Alexez 5 February 2016 16: 13
    +4
    This is not a tank - this is a 6th generation destroyer designed to break through the air defense system through the ionosphere in hypersound.