Polish concept tank PL-01 (photo gallery)

Concept tank The futuristic look was first shown several years ago. And the work is in full swing. However, there are rumors that a fully functional version may be ready in 2016. This article does not claim to be a detailed technical description of the conceptual model, let's just admire the creation of Polish engineering - the concept tank PL-01.

PL-01 is a Polish armored fighting vehicle based on the Swedish light tank CV90 / 120-T, created by OBRUM with the support of the British BAE Systems.

The concept tank PL-01 is developed jointly by the Polish company Obrum and the British company BAE Systems. Development began in 2013. The layout of the new tank was first shown to the public in the same year. Currently, this tank is only a technological demonstration model. A fully functional prototype machine must be made in 2016 year. This tank is designed to meet the possible needs of the Polish army. Some sources have reported that this tank could enter service in the 2018 year. Currently, the Polish army operates around 900 main battle tanks, including the PT-91 Twardy and Leopard 2. Also on long-term storage are about 400 OBT T-72. After the start of serial production, the PL-01 tank will also be offered to foreign customers.

The main weapon of the new PL-01 tank is the 105 caliber mm or 120 mm gun installed in an uninhabited turret in accordance with NATO standards. The gun will be capable of firing both conventional ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. Automatic loader provides a rate of 6 shots per minute. Combat is 45 shots, of which 16 ready for firing shells are placed in the slots inside the tower, the remaining ammunition stacked inside the chassis. The tank is also armed with an 7,62-mm machine gun UKM-2000C with 1000 ammunition ammunition.

In the remotely controlled combat module can be installed various weapons systems and protection. At the moment, the project provides for the installation of 7,62-mm or 12,7-mm machine gun or 40-mm automatic grenade launcher with 750 ammunition caliber 7,62 mm, 400 caliber 12,7 mm or 96 grenade 40 mm. An active defense system was also installed to intercept missiles, and smoke grenade launchers are built into the tower.

Materials used:
www.thebrigade.com
www.baesystems.com
www.wikipedia.org
Telegraf.com.ua
www.obrum.gliwice.pl

Comments

[Great-grandfather of Zeus]

The so-called "road tank" with narrow tracks that do not allow driving through the field after rain, and the low ground clearance guarantees the car that it will get stuck in our swamps completely. In addition, the onboard cursing protecting the chassis also deprives the car of maneuverability when driving on rugged terrain .. ...

[corporal]

Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus

narrow caterpillars

In the photo, it’s not much narrower than the 55s.

[inkass_98]

But the side screens reach the bottom rim of the rollers. On the cross-country roads in bad weather you can forget.

[Conductor]

Quote: inkass_98

But the side screens reach the bottom rim of the rollers. On the cross-country roads in bad weather you can forget.

I think that the Polish designers are not stupid and have come up with something about this problem. The width of the caterpillars is also in order. The uninhabited tower is actual. But for what tasks is this technique being created? There’s no 105-120 mm stock reserve for the future, booking- God forbid that 30 mm in all projections held
Base Swede CV90-120 (BMP with gun)

And when the Poles release the first batch, then we'll see if it's "peremog" or not

[Aleksandr72]

So along the way this is the T-55 in the new body kit dress (it’s good if the body kit is at least made of tin, not plastic or cardboard!)
Well this is a joke of humor. But seriously ... Without looking at it and discussing it seriously is impossible. Pshek turned out to be a creative little car - even now shoot in the next sequel to Star Wars - just an imperial armored vehicle, where there is a Russian "Armata". This is the real future of the tank, the main path for the development of armored vehicles!
I have the honor.

[ILDM1986]

clearance and narrow tracks are certainly a weak point, but the engine power of 940 horses per 35 tons of weight compensates for this shortcoming (if the weight data correspond to reality, the model, as I understand it, is not yet serial, it may "get fat"). armor is correspondingly weak, but there are KAZ and technologies to reduce the visibility. installed detectors of laser radiation, radar, all-round cameras. The wiki also says about the troop compartment for 4 people, in principle it is possible given that the prototype was not the T-55 but the CV90 BMP.

[vvp2412]

on the role of BMP somehow pulls, but not a tank!

[Pirogov]

on the role of BMP somehow pulls, but not a tank! ...................................... .....................................
........................ As for me and the BMP does not pull, so a museum exhibit.

[Remy_Argo]

Quote: vvp2412

on the role of BMP somehow pulls, but not a tank!

agree! ours is better ...

[darkriver]

You don’t understand anything in Polish military thought, this is a Polish CAVALERY tank.

[avdkrd]

Quote: ILDM1986

clearance and narrow tracks of course a weak spot

what are you really clinging to clearance? The clearance corresponds to the donor CV90, and she had no problems with patency. Of course you should not expect from this machine all-terrain at the level of Russian tanks, but this is not a SUV. It’s quite a tank for a European theater. The level of armor is definitely not lower than the same T-55. We have on a much lighter BMP-3 achieved protection against RPG-7 due to dz. The Polish body kit assumes an integrated DZ, if you add a workable KAZ to this, then security will be no worse than that of the T-72, or even better. The automatic loader with a rate of 6 rounds per minute, especially with a 105mm gun, raises questions, but overall the design looks viable. The question of price remains - something tells me that it will be at the level of Almaty.

[yushch]

[quote = Aleksandr72] So along the way this is the T-55 in a new dress-kit (it’s good if the kit is at least made of tin, not plastic or cardboard!)

By the way, my first thought was similar to yours, but then I saw that the T-55 with the tower only reached the base of the tower of this miracle and realized that it would be a very noticeable target in height. And if you really make a similar upgrade to the T-55, then it will be much more effective than this model.

[the47th]

It has been done for a long time, only it turned out nobody needs it:

[mvg]

It has been done for a long time, only it turned out nobody needs it:

We know how to count rinks? Why would it be 55?

[the47th]

Since when is the number of track rollers an unshakable feature of the platform? ZSU-57-2, for example, built on the platform of the T-54 had 4 road wheels each. It is immediately evident that the front track roller is different (and more specifically from the T-72). The installation of a 125-mm gun with AZ required the installation of an additional pair of rollers. In addition, the frontal armor of the hull is layered and much thicker. By the way, this is the T-55M6 project.

[wanderer_032]

Quote: the47th

It is immediately clear that the front track roller is different (and more specifically from the T-72).

No, not from 72, but from the T-80.

[Vadim237]

Anti-tank missiles do not care what height the machine will be - in the future, almost all missiles will be hit from above.

[yushch]

Quote: Vadim237

Anti-tank missiles do not care what height the machine will be - in the future, almost all missiles will be hit from above.

For a missile to hit a target, it must first be pointed. An ATGM operator, for example, where would it be easier to point and hold a missile, as you think? Or a simple fighter with a grenade launcher, where it will be easier to get?

[Vadim237]

Now there are such ATGMs - I shot and forgot which drones can direct - everything can be seen from above - and this is already today.

[yushch]

Quote: Vadim237

Now there are such ATGMs - I shot and forgot which drones can direct - everything can be seen from above - and this is already today.

I completely agree with you, but this will only work in a war with a technically "advanced" enemy, and as practice shows, basically conflicts take place with a technologically "backward" enemy.

[uwzek]

Quote: Vadim237

Now there are such ATGMs - I shot and forgot which drones can direct - everything can be seen from above - and this is already today.

So this cameraman shot and forgot. A racket will hit or not, the question is very open. An even more difficult question is whether the racket will hit the target when it hits.
And drones are easily blocked by electronic warfare.

[33 Watcher]

So it is, based on the T-55 was created

[Nross]

And here I agree: it makes an impression if not a cardboard copy, then out of tin or something like that. Although the concept is a concept. Negroes will star in star wars, they will spit out the witty Poles - they will have armor in addition to the chassis.

It looks cool, but you should not vouch for the performance characteristics.
To suppress the uprisings of their own population-the very thing is a machine ....

[vvp2412]

Take a closer look! Already! And 20-30% you know a lot!

[33 Watcher]

So it is built on a hodovka from 55 matches, in general, not already, this is an illusory effect due to the body kit. I probably read about him a year ago ... Apparently they added electronics, servos and again showed.

[uwzek]

Quote: Observer 33

So it is built on a hodovka from 55 matches, in general, not already, this is an illusory effect due to the body kit. I probably read about him a year ago ... Apparently they added electronics, servos and again showed.

So, if the tower is uninhabited, then where do you put the crew on the T-55? About the servos and electronics generally silent ...

[avdkrd]

Quote: Observer 33

So it is built on a hodovka from 55 matches, in general, not already, this is an illusory effect due to the body kit. I probably read about him a year ago ... Apparently they added electronics, servos and again showed.

I don’t know where you read, but it is built on the basis of the CV90 BMP (from the word for sure), with a front-mounted MTO.

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus

The so-called "road tank" with narrow tracks that do not allow driving through the field after rain, and the low ground clearance guarantees the car that it will get stuck in our swamps completely. In addition, the onboard cursing protecting the chassis also deprives the car of maneuverability when driving on rugged terrain .. ...

From the article:

This tank is designed to meet the possible needs of the Polish army.

Are they going to juggle him? Otherwise, why is it still needed?

[amirbek]

and what is it sticking out in front ... chtoli blaster?

[Alez]

Not enough xenon, panoramic roof and bottom lights. It looks futuristic, but how it will prove to be in combat conditions. It is unclear even how they will reload the ammunition, change tracks, where active dynamic protection. In World War II, British tanks were delivered to the USSR with closed sides, which could not drive off-road, trucks were clogged with dirt.

[Bath]

Quote: Alez

Not enough xenon, panoramic roof and bottom lights. It looks futuristic, but how it will prove to be in combat conditions. It is unclear even how they will reload the ammunition, change tracks, where active dynamic protection. In World War II, British tanks were delivered to the USSR with closed sides, which could not drive off-road, trucks were clogged with dirt.

and then forgot about tinting and most importantly do not slam the doors hard, otherwise the radio tape recorder will shake

[mvg]

In World War II, British tanks were delivered to the USSR with closed sides, which could not drive off-road, trucks were clogged with dirt.

Prev The Church of England and Matilda were cool, well-protected combat vehicles. Reliable and comfortable (unlike the early T-34, T-28, KV). The only significant drawback is the weak high-explosive fragmentation shell. 40-57 mm guns - clearly not what Dr. Guderian ordered.
Many tankers remained loyal to the same infantry Matilda until the end of the war.
It was just that they were few, unlike the T-34s, which were built in thousands per month. 40000 teshek .. for comparison, the Tigers were built less than 2000 pieces

[avva2012]

Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus The so-called "road tank"

Well, the side lights! did not forget to deliver. Headlights are generally a miracle, any Lexus will be jealous. And, so the feeling that the tank is in the tank, "matryoshka", damn it.

[screw cutter]

And I had the same feeling, to give this miracle from "Shilka" you look and 55ka will appear, although 35 tons are declared there ...

[abrakadabre]

A couple of observations:
1. A third of the photographs has a mirror-mounted arrangement of the tower machine gun’s power tape and the sensor holes on the front of the tower. That is, photos for the quantity are shown repeatedly, but mirrored.
2. With an uninhabited tower, in some photos where the upper projection of the tank is visible, I tried to find hatches for the WHOLE crew. Where are they? Or does everyone climb through a single driver’s hatch?

[ILDM1986]

there is a hatch in the back. through it and climb. just like a "carrot"

[avdkrd]

Quote: abrakadabre

. With an uninhabited tower, in some photos where the upper projection of the tank is visible, I tried to find hatches for the WHOLE crew. Where are they? Or does everyone climb through a single driver’s hatch?

In principle, the hatch made in the form of a ramp opening up and down is visible on the rear photo. The machine is made on the basis of the CV-90 BMP with a front MTO and has a significantly larger body height compared to the T-55.

[Voice of the Mind]

Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus

The so-called "road tank" with narrow tracks that do not allow to drive through the field after rain

Oh well) chassis from the Swedish CV90 BMP. The Poles creatively reworked the Swedish 2007 concept CV90120-T.
Recycled very funny, the tank seemed to be off the pages of a fantastic cartoon

[mihai_md2003]

I agree to all 100, it rushes not even to the specialist to whom I refer myself. Apparently a tank for European open spaces. Tears from the autobahn and all

[Andrey Yuryevich]

will go for a new film by Fedi Bondarchuk, such as "inhabited island" - but not good for anything else ... argue the miners, why this "SUV" will do ... except for the parade in Warsaw ..

[vvp2412]

At the independence parade at KaKloV!

[avdkrd]

Minus bad manners in the dispute. I will try to argue the viability of the Polish gloomy genius and at the same time justify the meaninglessness. The main criticism on the forum concerns the chassis and this is not correct, like kakly about the Armata, without argumentation. The vehicle is based on the British CV-90 BMP. Nobody blamed the donor car for its low cross-country ability and mobility, although the weight of advanced modifications (Mk lll) reaches 35 tons. The Poles also announced 35 tons in maximum configuration and 30 tons in standard configuration. The weight is comparable to the main tank. Considering the larger reserve volume, it seems to be not good, but we must take into account that the tower of the Pole is much lighter (the same T-55), despite its futuristic appearance, in fact, it is a spaced reservation with (possibly) built-in DZ, since it only protects the breech of the gun and AZ, not the crew. The Poles announced a modular ceramic-aramid coating, which suggests an advantage over conventional armor, I don't know what it is eaten with, but the use of a built-in remote sensing device looks more logical (which was the same, but there are no details), probably even in the side screens, plus KAZ. Poland has experience in deep modernization of tanks, and if everything laid down by the ideologists of this project works, then the tank's security will be at a high level. It is difficult to judge what kind of built-in remote sensing and KAZ the Poles will use. It is not necessary to rely on our own Polish systems (especially the KAZ developed jointly with Ukraine), but there are workable samples in the world. In general - "from the world on a nut - to the Pole a tank."
As a summary to the technical part, I can say (on my own) that the PL-01 will definitely be no worse than the T-55 with which it was rolled out to the bride and allowing a workable KAZ and with a 120 mm cannon, it can even spar with the T-72 with T-90 early releases (still modern SLAs and awareness). At the same time, all PL-01 does not pull on the main tank, the frontal armor in the front MTO even in Merkava is not rational in weight in comparison with the classics. Armata T-15 has a completely different solution for frontal reservation.
But now the second question is - was it worth the fence? The CV90 price of Norway’s BAE Systems sold in 2015 amounted to $ 9 million 28 tons. How much will the PL-01 with the declared bells and whistles cost, even scary to think, especially considering that there is no own electronics and KAZ. Honestly - it would be better to engage in deep modernization of the T-72, which they have enough.

[Waltasar]

As a machine for show and advertising the Polish military-industrial complex is good, handsome.
As a tank, let's see, everything depends on the implementation.

[oblako]

The design is modern with "stealth" claims, an uninhabited tower, the sides are well protected, apparently, but the main thing, of course, is the filling - nothing is known about it, but I am tormented by vague doubts ... it will not be bad. Nice move in the constructors battle. Most likely the crew is downsized. With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot. The Swedes are good designers, and in Poland the school is not weak either. I think we will have a different standard for the European war. He's a crossover, of course. But each car is created for its own theater of operations or for sale. "Merkava" is an example. We need to learn how to beat ...

[Bayonet]

Quote: oblako

We need to learn how to beat ..

Better on top, there the armor is thinner.

[vvp2412]

Yeah. Stealth technology ... Probably want to teach flying like an F-117

[corporal]

On this concept have already been walked repeatedly. From approval to trampling in guano. So the author did not show anything new.

What I think of this concept:
1. If it is equipped with electronics at the level of a 5th generation fighter, yes with the function of "God's gaze".
2. KAZ at the level of "Windbreaker" at least.
3. New armor that can hold the BOPS of the latest generations from all angles.
Yes, such a handsome man will be a new word in tank building

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: Corporal

such a handsome man will be a new word in tank building

what is "new"? an uninhabited tower, we have already embodied, futuristic forms and that's it!

[corporal]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

what's new"? futuristic shapes and that's it!

Well, I explained:

Quote: Corporal

1. If it is equipped with electronics at the level of a 5th generation fighter, yes with the function of "God's gaze".
2. KAZ at the level of "Windbreaker" at least.
3. New armor that can hold the BOPS of the latest generations from all angles.

What form? The eye pleases. Not only do airplanes be beautiful.

[vvp2412]

Probably, the f-117 was also first developed as a tank ... But it was taught to fly! :)
This one also needs to be taught to fly! :)

[Maksus]

Hanging the CV-90 with a bunch of carbon-like plastic and pulling the "Kruban" casing over the cannon - that's the whole Polish engineering idea. And yes, even diode stopar and daytime running lights. This thing is a normal BMP with only a large cannon. Tracked Centaur or SGM Striker.

[Chicot 1]

Quote: Corporal

1. If it is equipped with electronics at the level of a 5th generation fighter, yes with the function of "God's gaze".
2. KAZ at the level of "Windbreaker" at least.
3. New armor that can hold the latest generation BOPS from all angles

If ... If ... If ...

Quote: Corporal

such a handsome man will be

Do not drink water from the beauty ...

Quote: Corporal

will be a new word in tank building

But will he be at all? ..

[Bosk]

As I understand it now, tanks must pass the test in a wind tunnel?

[Mera joota]

Quote: Bosk

As I understand it now, tanks must pass the test in a wind tunnel?

No, what does it have to do with ... This form is caused by the need to reduce radar visibility for side-view radars and radars with a mode of mapping and target selection, which are usually in the range.

[screw cutter]

"This form is caused by the need to reduce RL"
Well then, the machine gunner does not at all fit in with this concept, they could have stuck it with something, it spoils all the beauty.
Is he interested in pneumatic suspension? Otherwise, on loose soil he will hang on the side screens.

[alex-cn]

why did they decide to compare it with the t-55? really does not pull on more? although if a 105 mm gun is possible

[Titanumide]

Handsome tank.

[Homo]

Quote: Titanumide

Handsome tank.

Where did you see the tank? Beautiful model.

[tchoni]

a kind of Polish vision of the tank of the future. Apparently, the pans are counting on the serious export potential of this device.
Personally, I am intrigued by one thing in this entire development: how is the automatic charging replenished? and how is the crew placed?

[Fenia04]

It looks futuristic, and even beautiful in its own way. True, there are so many questions about the performance characteristics and armor (especially about it).
Let’s see what appears in the future about this miracle device.

[Gavril]

In the opinion, as they say, stylish, fashionable, youth ... Give the characteristics, cost, then it will be possible to evaluate.

[Mera joota]

As far as I understand, PL-01 appeared as a result of adapting the CV90105 to the customer. Quite an interesting car, given that the CV-90 base has already earned respect and is in demand. If this is a series of machines for various purposes, then my respect to the Poles, or rather the Swedes from BAE Systems Hagglunds
CV90105 itself

[ziama]

PL-01 appeared as an adaptation of the light tank CV90120-T to the customer. All that has changed in it since 1998 is armor and guns. Initially, a 105-mm rifled gun was installed on it, then a 120-mm Swedish L50 gun manufactured by RUAG Land Systems, in 2010 developed the concept tank CV90120-T Adaptiv with a 120-mm German gun Rheinmetall Rh120 LLR L / 47. Adaptive armor seems a little expensive for the Poles, so it was redone, everything else, including the gun, went unchanged from the CV90120-T Adaptiv.

[La-5]

A Soviet machine gun, probably the automatic loader from the T-72 adapted.

[qwert]

If you believe Rezun, then since Poland has created a "Road Tank", then it plans to occupy all of Europe))))

[Gsxr1300rr]

This is serious, impressive (I'm talking about the NSW on the tower)

[the47th]

The characteristic appearance of the T-14 is due to the built-in, and not mounted, dynamic protection. But what determines the appearance of the PL-01, I can not understand? The fact that this is not a built-in remote sensing is visible.

into an uninhabited tower in accordance with NATO standards.

The parent CV90105 has an engine to the right of the driver. I wonder where the Poles put the gunner and the commander? Either there is a crew of one person, or the gunner and commander are sitting in an "uninhabited tower".

[Free wind]

And on one of the photos, on the machine gun, the price tag hangs, probably a Chinese machine gun, in case of failure it will be possible to hand over under the guarantee, you still need to save the check . And so a beautiful car and this is not the main tank, remember. the Poles talk about it, it's a light tank. no need to compare it with something, it has its own niche. On this machine, the engine is German MTV, and in the pictures our V -shki

[2s1122]

Its a niche, only women are cropping. Type sit down my darling with a breeze I will pump over.
And if without jokes, then this miracle will not cost cheaply judging by its appearance.
Wedge heels pure for the parade

[uwzek]

Quote: Free Wind

Surely a Chinese machine gun

It is quite possible that the Kazakh machine gun. They make "cliffs" there.

[james]

They are positioned as light, but the dimensions are larger than the MBT. And why such a huge tower, if it is uninhabited?

[the47th]

The Ukrainians will be put there, and since the Ukrainians for the Poles are "not people", then the tower is "uninhabited".

[avdkrd]

Quote: james

They are positioned as light, but the dimensions are larger than the MBT. And why such a huge tower, if it is uninhabited?

In general, the Poles position it as the main one. If it is light, then it would be in the cashier. It really stands as heavy. According to Wikipedia, the Korean K-2 "Black Panther" is the most expensive tank in the world $ 8.5 million, and only the donor CV-90 (cost Norway in 2015) costs $ 9.28 million .. The question is what is the most expensive tank in the world?
The tower is small by the way, given the AZ in the niche.

[bracket]

Quote: oblako

With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot.

what's behind these conclusions? in appearance? What kind of theater? The gun is not clear which 105 or 120 (it will already be too small). And what kind of logs is the SCHOOL of tank building, explain.

[vvp2412]

how what? :) Upgrade of Soviet tanks! :)
Well, there to stick the spoilers, put mud flaps, change the name! :)

[Riv]

In my inexperienced view: the body kit is extremely vulnerable even to small arms fire, and the tracks are too narrow for serious weight. And that I’m not very sure that it will fit two people ...

[Bayonet]

Quote: Riv

I’m not very sure that it will fit two people ...

He’s not so small, at 55 they fit

[Riv]

But at 55m only the driver is in front.

[avdkrd]

Quote: Riv

But at 55m only the driver is in front.

here is the same in front, to the left of the engine, it’s just not clear where the exhaust is from the Pole. The engine is exactly right like the CV-90.

[Hammer]

The original Cv-90 can withstand 30mm BOPS in the forehead. Very little for a tank. This means that you will have to radically increase the protection, which in turn will lead to an increase in mass, and this means that inevitably it will be necessary to strengthen the suspension and 100% change the engine to a more powerful one. Installation of a powerful dvigla, change the overall dimensions of the machine. All of the above means that the Poles not only have no tank, but even the concept does not correspond to a hypothetical real machine. And if you do not increase the armor, then you can use it only as a light tank, such as our octopus. Then there’s no need to talk about any competition with real tanks. These are the lesser problems that I saw from the photographs.

[vvp2412]

Octopus SD is a floating light tank. More precisely, a self-propelled anti-tank gun! Dynamics at the BMD-3 level. Comparison like horseradish with a finger. Well, if only armor can be compared. But not in combat qualities.

[Wolka]

a very controversial concept, for example, its powerful medieval knightly armored body kit for a gun with an uninhabited tower, as well as sides, causes some embarrassment in such expediency, in the presence of a small clearance and narrow tracks ...

[Fame]

The front tank is no more.

[76rtbr]

and what is the concept, they pulled the casing on the old "tractor", even the rollers were closed, so as not to immediately determine the type of "tractor" and are happy to the back seat !!

[Mercenary]

Body kit in the tradition of Western Futurism! It's hard to say about the ability of armor, but the tank’s ass asks for an RPG-7, (cheap and cheerful), a niche that is comfortable before, and if, to its surprise, it doesn’t break through, it will jam the tower. And LED flashlights will not help.

[Freeman]

Quote: Gavril

In the opinion, as they say, stylish, fashionable, youth ... Give the characteristics, cost, then it will be possible to evaluate.

Quote: oblako

The design is modern ..... With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot.

Well, the main "chip" has already been shown to you. "The" gadget "is able to make" selfies "in the mirror.

[vvp2412]

I wish you could still control it through a smartphone, like a kettle or boiler! :)

[Nikolay71]

Looks handsome, you can’t say anything. Let's see what happens in the end.

[Freeman]

Quote: Staffa

Quote: oblako

With network-centric capabilities and a potential robot.

what's behind these conclusions? in appearance? What kind of theater? The gun is not clear which 105 or 120 (it will already be too small). And what kind of logs is the SCHOOL of tank building, explain.

Why all this? The main thing now is to "settle" patent issues with Samsung and Apple.

[Arktidianets]

It looks futuristic

[Vadim237]

And this tank has a rear ramp like Merkava.

[R_D_V]

It’s going to go up in the parade;

[Army soldier2]

Dear, how can you draw conclusions on the model without knowing which performance characteristics are going to invest in it?

[Mikhail Zhukov]

Yes, no TTX are not going to invest in it, purely PR

[Ingvvar08]

Tank PL-01 is the first "Parquet" tank. We are waiting for the first "Road".

[Engineer]

What hype raised around this plastic bmp overgrown with drin? The Poles did not make a combat vehicle, but the scenery for the film in the Hollywood style. Our people, as always, look at the wrapper, but do not sniff what kind of city is wrapped in it.

[Termit1309]

Very beautiful layout. And the photos are beautiful. But how does this relate to tank building?

[adma]

And why it is compared with the T-55, if it is positioned as the latest model of BTT. It was more logical, at least with the T-72 ... And why in the turret a NSVT machine gun? But what about the NATO standard?

[Jackking]

The NATO standard still needs to be bought for grandmas, and the mountains of Russian arms remain. But the question arises - if they could not even make a machine gun, then what kind of tank can we talk about :)

[uskrabut]

Judging by the dimensions, the places in it dohrenisha, you can take the girls on a hike. One question torments: what is this thing made of? If made of steel, how much does it weigh. If it’s made of plastic, then how to fight on it - you can demolish the entire body kit from a shotgun.

[oleggun]

And what does RPG-7 think about this?)))

[Resistance]

I could not understand why he had a trim on his nose, and then he saw a photo where a guy pulled his hand down the trunk. In fell into place

[uwzek]

Quote: Persistence

Then I saw a photo where a guy pulled the barrel down with his hand. In fell into place

Any tank gun is hung in the trunnions. If you open it up, a child can swing it (he just doesn’t have enough hands). Otherwise, the stabilizer will have to be made very powerful.

[Amatar]

Handsome man! On such a ride to work, girls ride, and not fight.

[gla172]

The gap between the tower and the hull, it seems to me the kinetic shells when it gets there, will remove the turret, it’s just that the shell asks for it.

[General_colonel]

This tank needs chrome wheels and a spoiler

[Jackking]

The Polish tank is an oxymoron :)))

[holgert]

A great target ---- it’s next to the T-55th, like a down - overgrowth ....

[Freeman]

Quote: qwert

If you believe Rezun, then since Poland has created a "Road Tank", then it plans to occupy all of Europe))))

Exactly all, including England, even the "prul" was created for this, for roads with left-hand traffic.

[Black]

... well, cool crossover. will they sell in a mortgage?

[dima-fesko]

If my Moskvich 2140 (with all due respect) is hung with spoilers, moldings, and other restaylengs, and put next to a "chick in a bikini" - will go for a boomer!

[UNAUTHORIZED]

For the next series of Bond, it will do

[Titanumide]

He would see him in the battlefield. The guide will be brought to mind. And what is his armor. Can flying objects be knocked down?

[uwzek]

Quote: Titanumide

Can flying objects be knocked down?

Of course. Unexpected jumps.

[pavelty]

What does he have there stop signals in photo 2?))

[Dimon19661]

Poland and the concept tanks are incompatible.

[gla172]

Quote: Dimon19661

Poland and the concept tanks are incompatible.

Well, yes, it's worth remembering World War II, as they rushed to the German "steel blitzkrieg" with cavalry ....

[Alexez]

This is not a tank - this is a 6th generation destroyer designed to break through the air defense system through the ionosphere in hypersound.

[brotishka]

It's some kind of nonsense that's not viable from the start. Pininfarina probably developed the design.

[Cobra77]

Quote: Dimon19661

Poland and the concept tanks are incompatible.

Why, they are quite compatible. The Germans and we perfectly combined our tanks with the territory of Poland.

[gla172]

And in general, in my opinion, this is a truly conceptual tank... this is interesting and understandable. The 279th. And it certainly won’t get stuck....

[Evgen_Vasilich]

Quote: mvg

It has been done for a long time, only it turned out nobody needs it:

We know how to count rinks? Why would it be 55?

The modified product is a development of the Omsk KBTM. No need for nerves)))

[slaventi]

The Poles stole Bandarchuk from the "Inhabited Island"

[Zai pali]

Polish tanks. It's funny though.

[bochman]

Beautiful until the first shot of the "Armata"))))))))!

[Mavrikiy]

But I don't read you! Bores. I like the tank! Handsome! To the designer - zloty. Now there are quickly airfields-tankodromes all over Poland, smooth, painted and always with “3 tankmen” bars. And we can wait for the eastern barbarians.
Phew, we are ready to stand up for “she hasn’t died yet.”

[SkobarSerezha]

A worthy competitor to "Azovets"

[Lexeus]

"parquet tank" -)))) In Poland the roads are probably good.... And why is the D-12 engine in the photo? This is ours!)))

[Wiruz]

Child of intercourse between the F-117 attack aircraft and the Zumwalt destroyer Unnatural intercourse

[Ahil]

If he could still drive, there wouldn’t be any trouble. (It was written that way on purpose, I know Russian perfectly well)

[Denis Skiff]

this concept. All!

[Litsvin]

I know Polyakau as “flaky”. Both from a concrete historical point of view and from a purely everyday point of view. The concept of “tank-building power” can be applied to “police” in the same way as the concept of “space pioneers” is applied to “Papuans from Papua New Guinea”. Well, let them amuse themselves and the world for one thing by creating such a “mini-monster”. Funny...
My grandfather's relative served in the Polish army in 1939 (he was called up from the territory of Belarus, temporarily occupied by Poland in 1921). He told how Polish military commanders brainwashed their gunners before the battle, in particular they said that the Germans had plywood tanks. Then, after the battle, those brave Polish jouners who were lucky enough to be captured washed these “plywood” tanks of the remains of “horses and men.”
Therefore, there is no point in being afraid of such a Polish tank; it is some kind of parody, “riveted together on the cheap” from what was already there. A Pole by nature cannot make a good tank, he simply is not capable, because he is a trader from birth, as we have in Belarus there is such a proverb “a Pole is born with a knapsack (in Russian - a bag, a backpack) on his shoulders.”
There are only TWO COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD THAT MAKE THE BEST TANKS IN THE WORLD - GERMANY AND RUSSIA!!! All other countries are either “stupid”, doing something of their own, or copying from us or the Germans. AND PERIOD.

[Yankuz]

Beautiful! Futuristic! What can I say?

[vka]

beautifully drawn crap

[Dmitry Volodin]

I'm not a tanker, but I wasn't impressed

[magirus401]

I wonder if his trunk moves at all

[Uruska]

Beautiful tank. But the impressions are not very good. Some kind of computer, not real, toy, Photoshop. And it is very difficult to implement it in reality. And you can draw anything you want. My conclusion is interesting fantasies!

[rJIiOK]

The Russian people have always been famous for their hating)
Comrade readers, let's somehow proceed from the real performance characteristics, and since 99% of them are not there, plus everything will change closer to release - there is no need to splutter about what a terrible tank this is, and how our soldiers will destroy it with a birch at the ready.

This is, after all, a tank, not a horse with a machine gun) It rides and shoots. Even though Poland cannot go into space))

[Albert1988]

Quote: rJIiOK

let's somehow proceed from real performance characteristics,

That’s the problem: there’s complete silence about performance characteristics, there aren’t even approximate figures, while a pretty concept is actively being pushed into a bunch of exhibitions. And this already makes me think.
Moreover, inside there is a light tank based on the Swedish CV90, they promise British electronics. that is, this tank can be called “Polish” with a very big pretense: they will buy the car in Sweden, electronics in Britain and set up a screwdriver assembly in Poland...
With this approach, one can only guess about its price...

[Fantazer911]

This device is for oligarchs, to protect the cottages and the area around the house, to go to the beach, it’s unlikely to pick mushrooms, it will quickly sit in a puddle or get clogged with mud, if you really put the rollers in chrome and the spokes will be great!
The appearance is certainly cool, but its time has not come yet, and it’s unlikely that a Polish woman will make a good tank, much less a tank on her own, I’d like to drive one around the dacha!?

[Fantazer911]

This device is for oligarchs, to protect the cottages and the area around the house, to go to the beach, it’s unlikely to pick mushrooms, it will quickly sit in a puddle or get clogged with mud, if you really put the rollers in chrome and the spokes will be great!
The appearance is certainly cool, but its time has not come yet, and it’s unlikely that a Polish woman will make a good tank, much less a tank on her own, I’d like to drive one around the dacha!?

[Olegater]

This is what their rotten miracle apples do to Polish brains. This is something you can see in a nightmare. And they, having devoured the apples, embodied such a monster in metal. To intimidate its population, most likely.

[warriordima]

Looks good))

[pooop]

Come on, I’m not even surprised by such a one-sided assessment of the form of this concept)))
I'm sure that half of what was written is just an external emotional assessment)

_
It’s not just too early to judge anything, it’s not even correct.
We need to make 10 pieces and test them at the test site, draw conclusions, tweak them and finish them (if there is enough money).
_
It reminds me of the car exhibition in Detroit or Geneva. You look at the concept, it’s cool and everything is clear, you think: “well, the future has arrived!” You are waiting for the series to come out, you come to the salon, and there... a Chinese hat.

[Albert1988]

Quote: pooop

It reminds me of the car exhibition in Detroit or Geneva. You look at the concept, it’s cool and everything is clear, you think: “well, the future has arrived!” You are waiting for the series to come out, you come to the salon, and there... a Chinese hat.

This is most likely what will happen: they will abandon the futuristic body kit and in the end what will remain is a good-quality light tank, based on a reliable Swedish infantry fighting vehicle with British bells and whistles, which at the same time looks like a Polish one. The only question that remains is the question of the price of this product and the price/effectiveness ratio.

[xomaNN]

The display of "Almata" at the parade in Moscow also stirred up Polish tank builders

[WarMachine]

The Polish defense is trying to show off. No, this trick won't work!

[minirulet]

Beautiful, expensive, stupid and completely impractical in real combat. Such an armored fighting vehicle can only drive blacks around the city with good asphalt. In Harlem for example)

[cheguevarazhiv]

I don’t understand why such passions flared up in the comments when discussing the old chassis covered with plywood, plasticine, etc.