The Chinese Navy received another landing ship dock

36
On Monday in Shanghai, the ceremony of entering into the Navy's fourth amphibious assault ship dock Yimeng Shan (project 071) took place, the blog bmpd. The ship became part of the East fleet.



All four DVKD built in Shanghai at the shipyard "Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard". The latter was launched on January 22 last year, and in September its tests began.

"The first ship of the project 071 Kunlunshan was launched at the shipyard Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard 21 December 2006 years and handed over to the Chinese Navy in November 2007, the second - Jinggangshan - launched 18 November 2010 years and commissioned in October 2011, the third - Changbai Shan - 26 of September 2011 of the year and launched in September of 2012 of the year, ”the author recalls.



According to him, “each ship carries four Z-8F transport helicopters and two landing craft hovercraft of the 726 project, built" based on "American boats like LCAC."



It is noted that “the successful implementation of the construction program of these very large ships with a standard displacement of about 20000 tons will lead to China’s ability to conduct amphibious operations in remote regions of the world at about the level of leading Western countries (with the exception of the United States) and far superior to similar capabilities not only of the Navy of modern Russia, but also of the Navy of the USSR 1980's. ”



  • huohunfw.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    3 February 2016 14: 03
    The Chinese are stamping, like in the movie "2012"! We would be so. And in general such a beautiful boat.
    1. +2
      3 February 2016 15: 36
      Quote: Dimontius
      The Chinese are stamping, like in the movie "2012"! We would be so. And in general such a beautiful boat.


      C'mon ... the parachider is generally pretty ... Good luck to the Chinese ... otherwise there was nothing to bring troops to Taiwan)))
    2. +2
      3 February 2016 20: 41
      Quote: Dimontius
      The Chinese are stamping, like in the movie "2012"! We would be so. And in general such a beautiful boat.

      That's who you had to order "Mistral" (or, as it is in Chinese) ... It is not enough that they would have already been like this and 2 times more for the same money ... request
  2. +8
    3 February 2016 14: 08
    Well done. We envy the Chinese comrades with white envy. Against whom will they potentially be used? Taiwan or the disputed islands?
    1. -6
      3 February 2016 14: 28
      There is a thought that against ISIS.
      China, however, has expressed a desire to participate in our coalition a couple of times.
      1. +4
        3 February 2016 14: 32
        Quote: Lanista
        There is a thought that against ISIS.
        China, however, has expressed a desire to participate in our coalition a couple of times.

        Well, in Yemen, they landed Marines to evacuate their citizens. Impudent and unexpected. So to speak, "polite people" in Chinese))

        Well, something, but the Chinese know how to defend their interests ..
        1. +1
          3 February 2016 15: 13
          Yes, already. China has never been a "comrade" to Russia. And it is unlikely to be: the thousand-year history of China and the peculiarity of military and economic strategy speak about this. Rather, a "convenient" companion at this stage of history.
          1. +2
            3 February 2016 16: 45
            Quote: bhdir1946
            Yes, already. China has never been a "comrade" to Russia. And it is unlikely to be: the thousand-year history of China and the peculiarity of military and economic strategy speak about this. Rather, a "convenient" companion at this stage of history.


            China conducts its game exclusively, and never apologizes to anyone. This is from the time of Damansky. Mao Zedong, they say, was very fond of the tale of two fighting tigers and a cunning monkey that watches them and waits for an opportune moment to finish off. Tigers, in his view, were the USSR and the USA. But China needed to try as long as possible to occupy the role of a monkey. Features of national policy. China just bends its line well.
      2. 0
        3 February 2016 14: 52
        As is usually the case, it’s still difficult to sit out, but they run in before the victory, and, as it were, won together. Then they will have to share interests. What is their army weak? no, they are just waiting for a more appropriate moment, so that everything is clear without them, and there it’s not a sin to connect.
      3. +1
        3 February 2016 16: 26
        Isis minusers pulled up?
  3. +4
    3 February 2016 14: 13
    We have to rejoice at least for the Chinese shipbuilders .... ours would be at such a pace.
    1. +3
      3 February 2016 14: 50
      Quote: jaguar
      We have to rejoice at least for the Chinese shipbuilders .... ours would be at such a pace.

      In the 90s, our shipyards democrats cut metal, not everything is true, this is where all the problems with the fleet and the rest of the construction in the field of weapons, and not only that.
    2. 0
      3 February 2016 19: 19
      Quote: jaguar
      We have to rejoice at least for the Chinese shipbuilders .... ours would be at such a pace.

      Here, it’s more likely not to our shipbuilders, but to politicians, and not the pace, but more brains and less greed ... request
  4. +2
    3 February 2016 14: 17
    How is Ivan Gren doing there?
    1. +4
      3 February 2016 14: 24
      In the dock, on March the first exit.

      But these are different ships, in the sense of different classes, the Chinese also stamp similar to Gren Type-072A / B, with their own specifics (less range, seaworthiness and autonomy).
      10 tanks / amphibious tanks, 250 marines, base helicopter, cargo on the upper deck, 3800 displacement. 10 of such ships are already in the PLA and 2 are still in trials.
      1. +1
        3 February 2016 15: 54
        Quote: donavi49
        But these are different ships, in the sense of different classes,

        Yes, this is understandable, until recently, landing ships and weapons transports did not fit into the military doctrine of the Russian Federation at all.
        And now it is necessary ... but not.
  5. P81
    0
    3 February 2016 14: 20
    The ship is beautiful, but it is interesting that it has weapons. And time will tell how long it takes for the seas to pass before the first breakdown. There is simply a tendency that the weapons of their own production are not of very good quality. It’s possible to build 50 such beauties, only someone should cover them)))
    1. +4
      3 February 2016 14: 42
      Nobody puts armament on the DKVD! Every ton of weapons is harmful to the landing. Even the UDC, the latest Kenbers, have 4x20 mm guns, and remote guns from pirates and martyrs fight off.

      This 76mm gun, 4 universal installation for jamming / launching RBU / volleys on the ground (their development, they shove them all), 2 AK-630, MANPADS.

      These ships are hiding behind 054A with a Calm-Frigate (like on 11356 for the Navy) - of which there are more than 20 pieces in the PLA, 052C destroyers with C-300F and a new radar with large area canvases in the superstructure of which 6 pieces, as well as 052 universal destroyers mines (SAM there is the latest modification of the HHQ-64B) and the new radar in cooperation with world leader Thales.

      Yes, he has the same Gren armament - Duet + 2xAK-630M in the stern + MTPU with Cords from pirates / martyrs fighting off and MANPADS from personnel + A215 (MLRS) mounted or not yet clear.

      About to break. The first three ships showed themselves well, they are regularly located in Aden, go around Africa, the Mediterranean Sea and the Pacific Ocean.
      1. 0
        3 February 2016 21: 41
        Quote: donavi49
        A215 (MLRS) mounted or not yet unclear.

        Mounted ... But the dimensions of the grain and type 71 are not comparable both in type and speed of construction ...
        trinity 71

        and TDK type 72
        [img] http://ship.bsu.by/sm.ashx?guid=15866 [/ img]

  6. +8
    3 February 2016 14: 23
    And we can’t order a couple of these in the PRC for ourselves? At the Pacific Fleet. The Chinese are not French, probably they will not bend under mattresses. Naturally for their helicopters, weapons and other gadgets.
  7. 0
    3 February 2016 14: 24
    But I wonder how much such a pasudin costs? Is it more expensive than a mistral or what?
    1. +7
      3 February 2016 14: 49
      About 300 million dollars. But they squeezed the export version for 220mln for the tender - but it did not take off, or rather the customer did not find the money.

      The cheapest in the world is now Makassar. He's only $ 40 million. But he has a trick and an idea for the project "Even a country of the 3rd world and without money, an adult DKVD for 1 battalion with equipment and helicopters can afford!"

      The Philippines bought two for 91 million dollars, Peru is also two but in the homeless version, but they will build SIMA Callao at home.
      1. 0
        3 February 2016 15: 31
        You can order it yourself, only you need to clearly determine why, what application in the near future?
        Beat the Kuril from the Japanese? Or landings in Turkey to land?
        At first, I think, it is necessary to build up the defensive component of the fleet in order to prevent such floating suitcases from picking up a landing distance. Therefore, they are now engaged in patrol, destroyers and diesel-electric submarines.
  8. 0
    3 February 2016 14: 24
    oh-very similar to the contours of our shipbuilders !! landing current from the stern .. ?? and what to handle the shore with the landing ??
    1. +3
      3 February 2016 15: 00
      Landing there on LCAC tanks and artillery, and the rest on their own (they have special high-speed amphibious tanks and infantry fighting vehicles).



      Normal DKVD in general. Here is a boat tour:


      Far from the coast, he launches groups and helicopters - they storm strategic positions and places unsuitable as it is considered for landing (and little fortified). Then the second wave expands the bridgehead and the usual tank tankers-transports-supply ships come up and begin to be unloaded either through the TDK / LCAC link or to the constructed marina / captured port, or to a novelty - the Chinese analogue of the American MLP has already been accepted into the PLA and the second ship is being built, and MLP can serve as a marina for tank paratroopers and transports.
    2. +1
      3 February 2016 18: 57
      Quote: Yak-3P
      and what to handle the shore with the landing ??

      It’s stupid to land an assault on prepared shore.
  9. +2
    3 February 2016 14: 26
    And why not Russia and China to cooperate in the field of shipbuilding, as partners? For example, to start, order a landing ship dock, Yimeng Shan, with the ability to create these ships in the future, if not independently, then at least in conjunction with a greater share of the creation of parts of this project in their shipyards.
    1. 0
      3 February 2016 14: 58
      Because the Chinese will build them at home. Do we need it? It is necessary to build your own and yourself.
  10. +1
    3 February 2016 14: 29
    It seems that a fur-bearing animal, with slanting eyes, is sneaking towards Taiwan.
  11. 0
    3 February 2016 14: 46
    China is the only hope to stop the grabbers of the West
  12. +4
    3 February 2016 14: 46
    lucky the Chinese .... Get serious boats.
    They have stolen rear rear-generals-put on the wall
    Is it worth reminding us?

    Uncle Vova, where is the landing? What kind of strange order?
    The richer the thief today, the blind the prosecutor
    Uncle Vova, where is the landing? Kolyma dug up the beds
    And the whole honest people want to sow the garden.
  13. 0
    3 February 2016 14: 56
    To what extent the features of domestic shipbuilding are much guessed in his appearance. The scale is just different, unfortunately.
    1. +4
      3 February 2016 15: 14
      Yes, and agree, when you see the red flag on the mast, involuntarily rolls up sadness.
      It is a pity, of course, that the flag was changed. With our red flag, we won the Great War and were the first in space. Very sorry.
  14. +2
    3 February 2016 15: 02
    Yeah, the Chinese are stamping ships that your motor boats.
  15. PKK
    +1
    3 February 2016 15: 07
    In naval affairs, I don’t understand much. But I think that the DKVD are very vulnerable at crossings. In a big war they will be shot like aircraft carriers. From modern missiles, it’s very difficult to defend them. Apparently they will be used even if they gain air supremacy .
    1. +1
      3 February 2016 16: 23
      Well .. no matter how many landing ships go without escort of destroyers or frigates. In addition to ours, due to our lack of destroyers or frigates.
  16. +1
    3 February 2016 15: 11
    and according to civilian coastal fuel oil, it is a clone with:

    http://topwar.ru/37657-desantnye-transporty-doki-tipa-san-antonio.html
    1. +2
      3 February 2016 16: 26
      Not excluded. But what if a clone? China is building a fleet and the similarity of its ships to strangers is of little concern to them
  17. DPN
    0
    3 February 2016 17: 09
    Well done, the Chinese are able to bring their patriots to power, without breaking the previous gains.
  18. +1
    3 February 2016 20: 55
    The power of China is growing, they silently do their job.
  19. +1
    4 February 2016 09: 54
    Pretty quickly stamped

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"