Military Review

Foreign Ministry: Britain will help Libya, but will not send its troops there

20
London will support the new Libyan government of national consensus, when it is formed, but does not intend to send troops to the country, reports RIA News Statement by the head of the British Foreign Office, Philip Hammond, made in Rome, where representatives of the so-called “small group” of the Western coalition to combat IS gathered for a meeting.


Demonstration of the Libyan military at a base in Tripoli.

“Definitely, we will want to support the new government of Libya in any practical way that we can, but I can’t imagine that there will be a situation when it is necessary or we want to send combat units for a ground operation”,
the minister said to reporters.

“I don’t think we can decide that sending combat units to the field would be a useful contribution — there are enough armed people in Libya. They need organization, command and control, intelligence gathering from the air, a strategic organization, ”he added.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pereira
    Pereira 3 February 2016 09: 54
    +1
    there are enough armed people in Libya.

    we will want to support the new government of Libya in any practical way we can


    Soon there will be more armed people. And what is the new government? Is he already talking about the ISIS government?
    1. Kostyar
      Kostyar 3 February 2016 09: 56
      +7
      Anglo-Saxons, bullshit bullies, in all their glory ..... !!!
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 3 February 2016 10: 09
        0
        And most importantly:
        London will support the new Libyan government of national consensus when it is formed
        This is very far away! (x / f "can't be", V. Nevinnyi:
        ... I said I will give it back!
        Later.
        Half.
        May be!
        1. bort4145
          bort4145 3 February 2016 10: 39
          +1
          But the proto-ukry announced their intentions to send their "super-trained servicemen" to help amers.
      2. sgazeev
        sgazeev 3 February 2016 10: 10
        +1
        [quote = Kostyar] Anglo-Saxons, rascal bullies, in all its glory ..... !!!
        From oatmeal, courage will not increase. wassat
        1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
          Uncle VasyaSayapin 3 February 2016 10: 20
          +1
          Yes they need it? Climb your bare ass into the anthill!
    2. marlin1203
      marlin1203 3 February 2016 09: 56
      +3
      What is this in the photo?! .. melee hand-to-hand combat, and even in the stalls ?! belay Equilibrium is resting ... laughing
    3. GRAY
      GRAY 3 February 2016 10: 22
      +1
      Quote: Pereira
      And what is the new government?

      The British themselves do not know lol
      However, they got it right - this cannot be taken away. Now they can support any of the groups of their choice.
  2. PunisheR
    PunisheR 3 February 2016 09: 55
    +3
    Well, there’s nothing to say even laughing laughing laughing
    1. marlin1203
      marlin1203 3 February 2016 09: 57
      +2
      So you would be shaved and say "you're just cannon fodder." It would be more honest ... although it is quite in their spirit ...
  3. papont64
    papont64 3 February 2016 09: 56
    +4
    How to bomb and send mercenaries is so easy, but when the roasted rooster in ... they pecked right away.
  4. Finches
    Finches 3 February 2016 09: 56
    +5
    You already helped them somehow turning a once flourishing country into a destroyed dump and a hotbed of terrorism ...
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 3 February 2016 09: 58
    +5
    A bad brew is much easier to brew than later to dissolve. In the Anglo-Saxons, the natives themselves must do this, they are not sorry.
  6. bad
    bad 3 February 2016 10: 01
    +2
    Foreign Ministry: Britain will help Libya, but will not send its troops there
    ..heh .. how to bomb, so the troops are free and there are planes .. but how to really fight, so "we will think for you" is purely British policy, everything is by someone else's hands .. laughing
  7. polite people
    polite people 3 February 2016 10: 05
    +3
    Anglo-Saxons are the champions of LIES.
  8. BOB044
    BOB044 3 February 2016 10: 29
    +1
    And ISIS will fight there. Local tribes. Everything that you have developed there will come to you in Britain. You have a tongue without bones, you chat without giving an account of what you are saying. The cat will pour out, the tears of the mouse.
  9. v1tz
    v1tz 3 February 2016 10: 43
    +1
    Here's how, cynically and categorically, they refuse to support their brainchild. And there are plenty of such idiots who believe in the Naglosaks, including ours.
  10. Stinger
    Stinger 3 February 2016 10: 43
    +1
    Shy steel. Will the piglet send? After all, my dear Jamahiriya, and I don’t have to pay off my debts.
  11. Lelek
    Lelek 3 February 2016 11: 07
    +1
    (London will support the new Libyan government of national accord when it is formed, but does not intend to send troops to the country.)

    Who would doubt that. Shitting away from your own home, throwing bombs and missiles at cities and towns; to incite the radicals to banditry and murder, covering it with rants on democracy and humanism; to organize receptions regarding the hanging and tearing of objectionable leaders - this is in the spirit of Anglo-Saxon. And also (it’s already by definition - aerobatics) to push the cleaning and restoration after having done something to someone else. Humanists are fucking!
  12. cap
    cap 3 February 2016 11: 54
    0
    “I don't think we can decide that sending combat units to the field will be a useful contribution - there are enough armed people in Libya. They need organization, command and control, air intelligence gathering, strategic organization, ”he added.

    And the loud glory of the winner of everything and everyone in the name of democracy, since organization and control, intelligence gathering from the air, strategic organization were made by our valiant British warriors, I add.
    Prince Harry in Afghanistan fought tore everyone. The truth is there is terrorism now, but that doesn't matter.
  13. Prisoner
    Prisoner 3 February 2016 17: 25
    0
    So it seemed to beg for it. Have Libya been asked for permission to deploy its soldiers? Either they didn’t allow it, or the arrogant Saxons were frightened of something.