Media: The Pentagon will seek an increase in the military budget due to the "Russian threat"

55
Pentagon chief Ashton Carter plans this week to present his proposals for an increase in the defense budget against the background of the growing power of Russia and China, reports RIA News message "The Washington Post".

Media: The Pentagon will seek an increase in the military budget due to the "Russian threat"


“The head of the Pentagon, Ashton Carter, is expected on Tuesday to submit a proposal for the military budget to the agency for the 2017-th fiscal year. In addition, the head of the US military should justify why he considers the rapid strengthening of technological and military power of Russia and China, as well as Russia's intervention beyond its borders, as a greater threat than the activities of terrorist organizations, in particular the Islamic State, ”the newspaper writes.

“... The proposals reflect Carter’s attempt to include in the focus of military attention not only insurgent conflicts after 2001 of the year, but also the most important threats from Russia and China. American officials admitted that sometimes the modernization of the armies of these countries exceeds (the modernization of the army) the United States, ”the newspaper notes.

"The United States intends to oppose the progress of Russia and China in the military sphere in the next decade," a Pentagon source told the newspaper.

“Almost half of the new injections that Carter will offer will be aimed at combating the growing threat from Moscow,” which “has demonstrated a desire to use its military power from Ukraine to Syria,” said the source.

It is also assumed that the budget will be allocated 4 times more funds to strengthen the US military presence in Europe. “Washington intends to expand the deployment of combat vehicles and other equipment, help the allies to strengthen the military infrastructure and train qualified military,” the newspaper writes.
  • AFP 2016
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    2 February 2016 15: 24
    "In our time, it is not customary to reckon with the weak, - they reckon only with the strong."
    -Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin
    1. +8
      2 February 2016 15: 31
      Quote: andrey6060
      ... Nowadays, it is not customary to reckon with the weak ...
      - And what is the Pentagon budget there? - 600 billion! “Why not a trillion?” All the same, the same wrappers stamped!
      1. 0
        2 February 2016 15: 45
        Yes, maybe they finally end paper for dollars)))
        1. 0
          2 February 2016 16: 00
          90% of all this money is numbers and zeros on accounts. Current 10% goes in paper form. A little more on the keyboard ...
          1. 0
            2 February 2016 16: 33
            That's why a recent article
            Hammond: Russia only exacerbates the situation in Syria
            Today, 12: 23
            And all the statements from their jackal sips are precisely to increase the capacity of the bubble pump!
          2. +6
            2 February 2016 21: 16
            Pentagon. Obama and the generals discuss when it is best to attack Russia. They cannot come to a consensus when it is better to do so to win.
            We decided to ask those who have already attacked. They ask the French: "When is it better to attack?"
            The French answer: "We don’t know, but certainly not in the winter ..." Then they ask the Germans: "When to attack?" The Germans say: "We do not know, but certainly not in the summer."
            Dead end. What to do? Someone suggests - Let's ask the Chinese, they are the most advanced and cunning, always come up with something ...
            They ask: "The Chinese, when will we attack Russia to win?"
            The Chinese respond: “Right now, immediately. The Russians are building the Power of Siberia and the Turkish Stream, they’re also building the Vostochny Cosmodrome, they’ll start a bridge to the Crimea, they decided to rebuild BAM, they’re building new stadiums for the 2018 World Cup, they’ll master the Arctic - THEM AS FILMS NEEDED! "
      2. +1
        2 February 2016 16: 40
        Guys, imagine, well, maybe the Pentagon would achieve a reduction in the military budget?
        In general, this is not even news - routine. Not a Russian threat, so a Chinese one. not chinese. so Korean, though under Russia with China, more can be claimed. And soon, probably, the FBI will catch up with the growing terrorist threat and the NSA under something of its own, deeply hidden, will ask for something secretly. Everyday business.
        1. 0
          3 February 2016 13: 38
          I wonder when they will start to beg for money from an extraterrestrial threat ....?
    2. +9
      2 February 2016 15: 32
      "It is also assumed that the budget will allocate 4 times more funds to strengthen the US military presence in Europe." Washington intends to expand the deployment of military vehicles and other equipment, help the allies to strengthen the military infrastructure and train qualified military personnel, "the newspaper writes.

      In my opinion, all the hysteria of the Pentagon is reduced only to an increase in spending on military needs! This is the whole point of this war, to get out more money! I can’t believe how in the USA they seriously expect to fight with Russia, the gut is thin! But to bite from different angles or to poison someone, it's in their style!
      1. +1
        2 February 2016 15: 40
        The main thing is budget loot for the corporations of the American military-industrial complex and the expansion of the export of weapons of American manufacture. If at the moment there isn’t any war in the world, it must be started.
        1. +1
          2 February 2016 16: 16
          Quote: OldWiser
          The main thing is budget loot for the corporations of the American military-industrial complex and the expansion of the export of weapons of American manufacture.

          Oh, what a fresh and, most importantly, original solution - to ask for a dough for the "Russian threat"!

          I wonder what needs the Pentagon asked for money for from 1991, when the "Soviet threat" disappeared and until 2001, when the "fight against terrorism" appeared? I think the Pentagon will not be given money to "improve mutual understanding" ...
      2. cap
        +3
        2 February 2016 15: 50
        Quote: Diana Ilyina
        In my opinion, all the hysteria of the Pentagon is reduced only to an increase in spending on military needs! This is the whole point of this war, to get out more money! I can’t believe how in the USA they seriously expect to fight with Russia, the gut is thin! But to bite from different angles or to poison someone, it's in their style!


        Everyone will be brought to Europe, they will find a new Fuhrer and onward. There was no money for a new scenario. Primitive but valid. Migrants are already in crematoriums. They just live for now. But for now.
    3. +8
      2 February 2016 15: 34
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/264/hvel69.png
      1. +4
        2 February 2016 15: 38
        It is also assumed that 4 times more funds will be allocated from the budget to strengthen the US military presence in Europe.

        This means that the United States will shove its military junk into Europe 4 times more.
        1. +1
          2 February 2016 15: 41
          and financially shoe the Geyropeans for a large sum.
          1. +1
            2 February 2016 15: 45
            Again in the Hall of Holocaust the snowstorm is carried.
            1. 0
              2 February 2016 15: 56
              Quote: Fregate
              Again in the Hall of Holocaust the snowstorm is carried.

              The cannon is gaining strength lol What is the forecast for the states from the hydrometeorological center?
    4. 0
      2 February 2016 15: 48
      Quote: andrey6060
      "In our time, it is not customary to reckon with the weak, - they reckon only with the strong."
      -Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin

      Yes, strong and weak have nothing to do with it. It's all about the money. If there is no military threat, then the mattress military will not receive a cent. And they want to eat and drink well. So all this hysteria with the Russian military threat is just for that. If mattresses were smarter, they would never have allowed the fall of the USSR.
    5. 0
      2 February 2016 15: 52
      Pentagon CEO Ashton Carter plans this week ...

      The hatefulness and greed of this "chapter" pales only before the Russophobia, stupidity and idiocy of McCain! lol
      It's just that people got hold of power and dough. And since the sawing is the main method of modernization of the US army, the eyes of the "new head" are shining and the little hands are shaking. In general, nothing new, even the old slogans.
    6. -1
      2 February 2016 16: 19
      "In our time, it is not customary to reckon with the weak, - they reckon only with the strong."
      -Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin

      Actually, it was so in the past, it is in the present and will be in the foreseeable future.
      And therefore, prepare the sleigh in the summer ... and the "tomohawk of war" - ALWAYS!

      It is clear that the US military budget is very bloated, but we would have to keep our own in the right framework.
      Only for this, the economy needs to be tightened up, the ruble must be "excommunicated" from the "green presidents", the fifth column must be liquidated, and ... there is no one.
      Already the current Twitter-government and "elite" is definitely beyond the power!
      It’s not for you to distribute state petrodollars to your personal pockets, here you NEED TO WORK!
    7. +2
      2 February 2016 16: 37
      Where are our "commissions"? laughing
  2. +3
    2 February 2016 15: 25
    “It's time to say decisively and irrevocably that you need to fight enemies, not to agree.”
    -Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 18: 48
      That’s nothing else!
  3. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 25
    They are brakes, however .... only they requested deneh ... laughing

    Ext .: Or they thought as if in jest a pregnant woman - or maybe it will resolve itself ...
    1. +1
      2 February 2016 15: 32
      Quote: iConst
      They are brakes, however .... only they requested deneh ...


      Why brakes? On an imaginary threat and someone else's fear, you can make good money. The frightened man in the street will be ready to give a lot in order to get rid of this fear. Nothing personal just business.
    2. +1
      2 February 2016 15: 33
      "The United States intends to confront the progress of Russia and China in the military sphere in the next decade",
      Wow, they are going to live.
      And the "Doctor" said: to the morgue .....!
  4. 0
    2 February 2016 15: 26
    For 2017, is there something that was allocated for everyone?
  5. +2
    2 February 2016 15: 30
    If you remove at least 50% of your bases, a lot of dough is freed and there will be no need to increase anything
    1. +1
      2 February 2016 15: 43
      The sphere of vital interests of the SGA is the whole world. Didn't you know?
      1. -1
        2 February 2016 16: 22
        The Pentagon will seek an increase in the military budget by any means. Russia is just an excuse. They don’t have friends, that neither the country is either vassals or enemies.
  6. 0
    2 February 2016 15: 30
    How much more? Up to 1 trillion dollars a year?
  7. +3
    2 February 2016 15: 30
    I wonder if I will live to see the time when the US begins to pay its debts. How many public debt do they have there today? After all, someday this money will have to be given winked
    1. +3
      2 February 2016 15: 39
      Quote: Wiruz
      I wonder if I will live to see the time when the US begins to pay its debts. How many public debt do they have there today? After all, someday this money will have to be given winked
      “They have at least three debt relief scenarios.”
      - WW3
      - TTIP
      - Replacing the dollar with Amero, sending three letters of "wrong" borrowers.
      1. +2
        2 February 2016 15: 47
        Make a denomination - remove 6 zeros from the price tags - and that's it!
    2. +1
      2 February 2016 15: 42
      They will carry out debt restructuring and most of the debts, if not all, will not have to be repaid.
  8. +4
    2 February 2016 15: 30
    By the way, next year they will have enough of a trillion, there will again be mega-projects such as a vertical take-off tank, guns using stealth technology, armor dodging shells and missiles, and others, etc., etc. ...
  9. +3
    2 February 2016 15: 34
    In other words, if there weren’t Russia, the Pentagon would have invented it. But how good it is, the Pentagon pray for us.
  10. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 36
    "The United States intends to oppose the progress of Russia and China in the military sphere in the next decade," a Pentagon source told the newspaper.

    Ashton, you will begin to resist, do not tear your navel ...
  11. +2
    2 February 2016 15: 37
    The Pentagon will seek a reduction in the military budget --- that would be a "bomb" !!! And so, the same thing. Not the McCains, so the Carters open their mouths and say the same thing. No creativity laughing
  12. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 38
    And in 2017 there will already be a new "American guarantor" instead of Husseinich, which means they will definitely increase
    Especially in Iowa Clintonsha wins from Democrats
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 16: 05
      Quote: DMoroz
      And in 2017 there will already be a new "American guarantor" instead of Husseinich, which means they will definitely increase
      Especially in Iowa Clintonsha wins from Democrats

      Clintonsha shared the 1st place with the head of one of the states (I did not remember his last name). Trump on the second. But this is not an indicator. There will still be 40 such primaries. And as many times can change.
  13. +3
    2 February 2016 15: 41
    Have you heard, striped-eyed? And in your list only Russia and China? Where is the DPRK? And write India there. Do you want to embrace the immensity and pray for this? Well, well, creak feathers ...
    1. +1
      2 February 2016 16: 09
      Quote: LÄRZ
      Have you heard, striped-eyed? And in your list only Russia and China? Where is the DPRK? And write India there. Do you want to embrace the immensity and pray for this? Well, well, creak feathers ...

      No, they declare us a threat with the Chinese, and others, including from the SCO and BRICS, are called into the Atlantic Trade Association. Thus, they are trying to break the existing state associations that are not under their control.
      1. +2
        2 February 2016 16: 19
        Quote: GSH-18
        and others, including from the SCO and BRICS, are called into the Atlantic Trade Association.

        I hope they are smart enough not to get caught up in American green cookies. In American: "The first injection is for nothing, and then for money."
    2. 0
      2 February 2016 16: 31
      ... in India they have already begun to raise the dregs on the basis of caste politics, so it is necessary to throw some green money there ... if I am not mistaken, the Ministry of Defense is responsible for preparing and supervising "color revolutions"? They want to exclude potential allies of Russia from the game ... after all, they said that the BRICS no longer exists, and there are still many things they will say and justify these statements as a state "override" and again "do not hide your money, otherwise there will be trouble", here, here and there we won, but damn again the threat from the East, South or from space or global warming or absolute dullness ... about inventing reasons for pulling the dough, the Americans were always the first ... after our government, of course wink
  14. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 49
    Shaking (literary word) for their Euro-garden. It is necessary to cut the Eugope, and here Russia with its philanthropy and independence ...
  15. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 49
    Note how effectively the funds of the military budget of the Russian Federation are used. So where is corruption?
  16. +2
    2 February 2016 15: 49
    Well, it’s not for nothing that they cry all the time that their ships don’t go, their airplanes don’t fly, and their tanks don’t shoot. Without the addition, the money will be lost. laughing
  17. 0
    2 February 2016 15: 50
    Saw cut thrives over a large puddle?
    1. Fat
      0
      2 February 2016 17: 42
      Quote: Igor V
      Saw cut thrives over a large puddle?

      There, this case is put on a professional basis and is called not "corruption", but "lobbying" hi
  18. +2
    2 February 2016 15: 58
    How much the budget does not increase, and the US will come to you anyway. hi
  19. 0
    2 February 2016 16: 02
    Pentagon CEO Ashton Carter plans to submit proposals this week to increase defense budgets amid growing power in Russia and China
    The bad news.
    This means that there will be no peace in the Donbass.
  20. 0
    2 February 2016 16: 13
    Announce a contest among our rocket launchers - and who gets from the first rocket right into the center of this pentagon?
    1. +1
      2 February 2016 16: 28
      Here it depends on which rocketers. After all, there are such that a kilometer there, a kilometer here, but there will be nothing left of the pentagon or its center wassat . Therefore, the second attempt may not be.
    2. 0
      2 February 2016 22: 01
      Previously, in the very center of the Pentagon, there was a summer cafe, which was called the point-zero. The target was painted on the floor, guess which table was considered the most honorable?
  21. +2
    2 February 2016 16: 18
    I didn’t understand, due to our threat, we are looting ourselves, and our rollback from this, we tried in vain am
  22. 0
    2 February 2016 18: 38
    I generally respect when they lie with inspiration, with imagination, reasonedly, juicyly, vividly. Do not mind 20 kopecks. give, for trying.
    And here With chewing gum behind the cheek Russian tanks, again Cossacks, sailed. And this is with 1 military budget, with 1 navy. And according to history, we have never cooked porridge in their Yerka.
    I would not give them 20 kopecks.
  23. 0
    2 February 2016 18: 41
    Well, no horror stories:

    Dali Murochka notebook,
    Mura began to draw.
    “This is a furry Christmas tree.
    This is a horned goat.
    This is an uncle with a beard.
    This is a house with a pipe. ”
    “Well, what is it,
    Incomprehensible, wonderful
    With ten legs
    With ten horns? ”
    “This is Byak-Zakalyak
    Biting
    I myself invented it from my head. "
    "Why did you drop the notebook,
    Stopped painting? "
    “I'm afraid of her!”

    K.I. Chukovsky
  24. 0
    2 February 2016 18: 52
    Dear forum users, over the past 3-4 years in the media, and in all articles devoted to the army topics of foreign armies, specifically armaments in lice, the demand for an overestimated budget from governments is constantly passing by the red line. Moreover, the required amount exceeds the required requests of the ministries of defense of foreign states. So I want to ask, but where is the difference in the purchased equipment and the amounts received? Is it all stolen by private individuals? Well, do not believe me that this is possible.
  25. 0
    2 February 2016 21: 05
    we will ruin their budget with myths and tales we will drag them into the Cold War without participating in it laughing
  26. 0
    2 February 2016 22: 10
    increase everything increase and there’s no sense only gays it’s not the army but the brothel that’s getting bigger
  27. 0
    2 February 2016 22: 14
    Yes, it’s scary to think that the American military budget is ten times higher than ours, Russia is surrounded by their bases on all sides, they have a pack of allies and yet we are the first threat to them. And they are aware in the Pentagon that we are still at -30 at stops we drink beer.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"