Congressman: the IG group strengthened its position in Afghanistan and Libya

22
The successes that were achieved in the fight against IS in Iraq are largely compensated by the fact that terrorists are strengthening their positions in other countries, reports TASS Statement by Mack Thornberry, Head of the US Congressional Armed Services Committee



“Obviously, the IG is expanding its presence in Libya, the administration recognizes this,” the legislator said. Yes, success was achieved in Ramadi (Iraq), but all this is leveled by the fact that ISIS is increasing in Libya, in Afghanistan and other places. ”

According to him, "European countries now have to worry not only because of the militants who can penetrate into the EU from Iraq and Syria, but also because of the Islamists from other states in the region."

Last week, Obama met with members of the National Security Council and instructed to continue to support the counter-terrorism forces of Libya. White House spokesman Ernest said later that Washington was in favor of a diplomatic solution to the Libyan problem.

“Our strategy in Libya is consistent with the actions that we have committed in other places, and provides strong support for the ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve the political situation,” he said.

It is not only the fight against terrorists, but also the formation of the government of national consent in Libya. However, there are no concrete decisions on this.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    2 February 2016 15: 03
    Interestingly, NATO will bomb Libya again?
    1. +1
      2 February 2016 15: 06
      “Our strategy in Libya is consistent with the actions that we have committed in other places, and provides strong support for the ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve the political situation,” he said.


      In short, another brain stem.
    2. +4
      2 February 2016 15: 08
      And where does their 60-look-strange coalition?
      1. +4
        2 February 2016 15: 47
        Quote: milann
        And where does their 60 ty-strange coalition look?

        They squinted at the prospect of impending bliss with a new flood of refugees.
    3. 0
      2 February 2016 22: 45
      Libya is preparing as a terrorist base - the horror of Europe. In order not to show off, just in case.
      Terrorists are also people, because they need to live somewhere, so they will live in Libya, since the evil uncle Assad does not want to leave, although he "must". Yes, and still away from the Dark Lord Pu Libya.
      The preparation of positions in Libya is, so to speak, humanitarian aid to "people too" in the spirit of humanity and tolerance on the Western model.

      Quote: Pereira
      Interestingly, NATO will bomb Libya again?


      It will, of course. With the same success as Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan ...
  2. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 07
    The backup option in action, the State Department and the Turks pull the igil to where it is in relative safety, and further shake the region, at the same time and replenishing the ranks of the militants with new recruits.
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 17: 57
      ... and expanding the ranks of the militants with new recruits ...

      ... well, this is unlikely to take on a direct global character, they have nothing to pay with these fighters, they start to scatter, thanks to the work of our videoconferencing ... and where to get the dough on the new ones? Qatar began to think about the future, there is no need to expect any special favors from fascinatington, so "warriors of Islam" are better trained as "refugees" - and there is no need to fight and what money they pay and you can fuck Europeans with impunity and make fun of ... but let the fools fight and maymunas with propagandized and programmed brains ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 10
    Is Obama Concerned About Europe’s Security? Come on, no need ... laughing
  5. +6
    2 February 2016 15: 10
    significant: it is Libya and Afghanistan. in short, where the Yankees gave birth to democracy. and Iraq, not far away.
  6. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 12
    Something heroic, NATO is in no hurry to send troops into Libya. I suppose it was scary, done things.
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 18: 01
      ... why do they need it? They will either send someone there or wait until Russia reaches Libya, and the Yankees will stick out - Russia can be blamed once again for something and not to make them .. why, and even vice versa, lead something again and puff out their cheeks and other parts of the body from self-awareness ...
  7. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 17
    The West chooses between al-Qaeda of various types, but the essence does not change - even though it is IS, Jebhat al-Nusra, Jaysh al-Fath, Ahrar al-Sham, the only difference is the length of the dagger with which they decapitate their victims.
  8. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 20
    Dear ones, do not rush to believe this statement, they will bomb anyway while blaming Russia, but the goal is different, control over the region, that's why Daesh is being introduced there, then the "good" guys will pass, then the situation in Egypt will swing and further, further
  9. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 24
    Quote: The same Lech
    The West chooses between al-Qaeda of various types, but the essence does not change - even though it is IS, Jebhat al-Nusra, Jaysh al-Fath, Ahrar al-Sham, the only difference is the length of the dagger with which they decapitate their victims.


    Not so: the West suggested that the so-called "moderate" opposition initially disinfected the knife over humane decapitation. wink
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 18: 07
      ... yeah, and under local anesthesia ... well, to be more humane, without violating democratic freedoms and crying human rights and international law too ... it's holy
  10. +1
    2 February 2016 15: 32
    DAISH as a locust spread. Where there is something to profit from, they climb there. Such only to completely destroy, not otherwise. No negotiations and a peaceful settlement will help.
  11. 0
    2 February 2016 15: 43
    Are there moderate ones in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan? And then somehow the struggle is uncertainly ... More and more are discussing something. request
  12. +3
    2 February 2016 15: 57
    Well? They instilled in "democracy" in their own image wherever you get, now get out of your way. If you do not know how to solve international issues normally, do not take it! Or as always: "We will not do it anyhow, we will do it as we have to."
  13. +1
    2 February 2016 17: 16
    They intensified in Libya and Afghanistan ... because ... because Russia does not crush them there ...
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 18: 04
      ... Russia is pressing them THERE and into Europe ... where are the unfortunate "moderate" for them to go?
  14. cap
    +1
    2 February 2016 17: 36
    Quote: afrikanez
    DAISH as a locust spread. Where there is something to profit from, they climb there. Such only to completely destroy, not otherwise. No negotiations and a peaceful settlement will help.


    "Well, what am I, wandering around this desert all my life ?! :)"
    1. 0
      2 February 2016 18: 03
      ... well, actually they’re not negotiating with terrorists, is this a stateful aphorism, if I’m not mistaken?
  15. +1
    2 February 2016 18: 15
    Not even surprising)))
    Strengthening of Daesh occurs exclusively in those regions where the United States and its coalition allies control or are trying to control the situation.
    And at the same time, they declare that they do not see the serious successes of Russia.