Hammond: Russia only exacerbates the situation in Syria

66
Russian airstrikes in Syria are aimed at supporting Assad and result only from the escalation of a military conflict, reports TASS statement by the head of the British Foreign Office, Philip Hammond.



“The Russians are undermining all our (Western) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant frustration,” said Hammond during a visit to the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan. - They declare: let's negotiate. After that, they say, say and say, but the problem is that at the same time they are delivering bombing strikes, the purpose of which is to support President Assad. ”

In his opinion, this Russian policy has led to an increase in the number of refugees.

“Since the beginning of the Russian intervention in Syria, a thin stream of Syrians, who, apparently, began to return from the refugee camps back to their homeland, has completely dried up,” the diplomat said.

“Moreover, now even more people are fleeing the country,” he added.

"The Russians say they want to destroy the Daesh, but they are bombing not theirs, but the moderate opposition," says Hammond. - Less than 30% strikes VKS RF directed against the "Daesh". Russian intervention only strengthens the position of the Islamists in the region, which is in conflict with the tasks that Moscow has declared. ”

The minister also criticized the actions of Iran, which "like Moscow does not put enough effort to resolve the conflict."

“I don’t think that at least one of these countries contributes to peace. Both Iran and Russia are interested in maintaining the current regime in Syria and are ready to firmly defend their position, ”Hammond said.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    2 February 2016 12: 26
    How disappointed his disappointment was - he was all twisted!
    1. +17
      2 February 2016 12: 30
      Classic vile Anglo-Saxon!
      1. +8
        2 February 2016 12: 31
        Quote: Hammond:
        only lead to an escalation of military conflict,
        Oil began to leak through fingers.
        this policy of Russians led to an increase in the number of refugees
        Exactly! Only when you bombed civilians fled, and Russia drives the "refugees" of IS. To you "on a visit", IN EUROPA.
        So got up! The point is squeezing something!
      2. +5
        2 February 2016 12: 36
        But these "peacekeepers", along the way, did everything for the "world"!
      3. +2
        2 February 2016 12: 49
        Quote: neri73-r
        Classic vile Anglo-Saxon!

        The actions of the Russian air forces really aggravated the position of the western coalition in supporting moderate terrorists!
        1. 0
          2 February 2016 12: 51
          TASS
          10:43
          Russian Foreign Ministry called “dangerous stuffing” London accusations against Moscow in escalating the war in the SAR
      4. +2
        2 February 2016 14: 52
        Well, how can you not remember our great-great-grandfather Alexanlr Vasilievia: The Englishwoman is crap.
    2. +13
      2 February 2016 12: 31
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/545/kyyy755.jpg

      fool fool fool
      1. +3
        2 February 2016 12: 58
        Wherever he wants to be sent, he happens there 7 times a day. lol
    3. +7
      2 February 2016 12: 33
      Russian airstrikes in Syria are aimed at supporting Assad and only result from the escalation of military conflict, reports Tass statement by the head of the British Foreign Ministry Philip Hammond.

      Usual statements of our enemies hiding under the guise of "democratizers" that have nothing to do with reality!
      So we are doing everything right and on time good
      1. +1
        2 February 2016 13: 59
        Quote: GSH-18
        bullish statements of our enemies with no reality

        How is it, "having nothing with reality"? Direct connection - the worse things are with ISIS and the more chances for Assad to win (peace in Syria), the more active attacks on us!
    4. +12
      2 February 2016 12: 33
      Well, today we discussed one mattress fool earlier, and the second half-wit appeared, the English dart was remembered, for us there is no moderate or immoderate opposition, for us there is only the Assad army or the PATRIOTIC opposition, the remaining ENEMIES. Yes and the mattress coalition are the same enemies.
    5. +3
      2 February 2016 12: 38
      Russians undermine all our (West) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointment, ”said Hammond. In his opinion, such a Russian policy led to an increase in the number of refugees.

      Besides matyukov nothing comes to mind.
      The minister also criticized the actions of Iran, which "like Moscow does not put enough effort to resolve the conflict."

      Powerfully pushed back! laughing A year and a half of the xpenokoalition's actions simply shine with "efficiency"! Enemy excavators, the desert and hospitals with electrical substations in the peaceful cities of Syria have been valiantly destroyed!
      In a word, yap and not a diplomat.
      1. +4
        2 February 2016 12: 42
        The usual shift from a sore head to a healthy one. In the course of true and present politicians have sunk into oblivion. Only rats remained.
    6. Tor5
      +1
      2 February 2016 12: 46
      the dog barks - the caravan goes on.
      1. jjj
        +1
        2 February 2016 12: 49
        So, practical preparations began to define Russia as an aggressor. They will ascribe a hundred or two thousand of dead civilians, and they will bind refugees to Europe. And you can start the bombing.
        But what will be the reaction if one of ours openly declares that Paris and Berlin have not been taken for a long time
    7. +1
      2 February 2016 12: 49
      of course exacerbates. It's right. but only for ankslaksov.))) Viva comrades !!!
    8. +1
      2 February 2016 12: 59
      .... How his disappointment cringed - the whole thing was already crooked! ...


      .... And he calculated the percentages: "... Less than 30% of the attacks of the RF Aerospace Forces are directed against the targets of Daesh." ... laughing
    9. +4
      2 February 2016 13: 03
      Russian policy has led to an increase in the number of refugees.

      It can be seen that these "refugees" are striving for Europe, fleeing from Russian aviation bombs!
      All of Europe sees the "poor" and "peaceful" refugees and "supports" them!
    10. +1
      2 February 2016 15: 09
      Outwardly, they are all uro..y, rats are natural. But they are smarter.
    11. +1
      2 February 2016 16: 20
      Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin
      How disappointed his disappointment was - he was all twisted!
    12. 0
      2 February 2016 18: 42
      How his disappointment cringed - he was already twisted all over! ......................................... ..................................
      ....................................... The fact that it is skewed is okay, and what is it disgusting r.ozh?
    13. +1
      2 February 2016 21: 33
      He has an inadequate face. Most of them are there.
  2. +6
    2 February 2016 12: 26
    The true Anglo-Saxon ..., gentleman! laughing
    1. +3
      2 February 2016 12: 31
      The wards, they are Daesh, the point burns fellow , reluctance to fight then to death, here are the cries of the wrong behavior of Russia in the war,forever we do not punish them by the rules! laughing
    2. +5
      2 February 2016 12: 35
      I’ll add, is it British scum that has colonized half the world, put on drugs and is it still barking at the state level that they are still hunting? am
  3. +4
    2 February 2016 12: 26
    Thugs do not burn. Their "efforts" are the blood of the Syrians.
  4. +4
    2 February 2016 12: 27
    “The Russians are undermining all our (Western) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointment,

    Here he never once lied!
    1. +1
      2 February 2016 12: 43
      Quote: Lesovik
      Here he never once lied!

      True, he didn’t specify that the Anglo-Saxons planted this bomb after the First World War, when they divided Messopotamia, I mean the geographical region of Mesopotamia, where the British divided them at will, and not according to historical regions, and then strengthened after the Second World War.
    2. 0
      2 February 2016 12: 46
      Quote: Lesovik
      “The Russians undermine all our (West) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointments,

      Here he never once lied!

      Yes. If only replace "frustration" with "diarrhea"!
    3. +1
      2 February 2016 13: 31
      For the West and small Britain in particular, Russia is a "source of constant disappointment" in life. Let it be so in the future as long as Russia stands!
  5. +3
    2 February 2016 12: 27
    Shaw, again? How can you make it clear that yes, we are bombing those who are fighting against Assad and the people of Syria. And we don't give a damn about brown "" or chocolate, we don't dig in "shit" !!! And you can pick and pick with a stick ... ugh, sorry for the abomination, got it !!!!
  6. +3
    2 February 2016 12: 28
    It would have been better if he had kept silent the pig, and remembered for whom it all began.
    1. cap
      +2
      2 February 2016 12: 51
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      It would have been better if he had kept silent the pig, and remembered for whom it all began.

      It all started with them. British.
      How they imagine everything can be found easily. And how they react to the actions of their monarchs and their subjects.

      The Five Worst Atrocities of the British Empire
      As a recent YouGov poll showed, many Britons are proud of the British Empire and its colonial past.
      It turned out that 44 percent of respondents are proud of the history of British colonialism, 21 percent regret that it had a place to be, and another 23 percent hold a different point of view. According to the same survey, 43 percent positively assess the British Empire, 19 percent negatively, another 25 percent have a different opinion.
      In 1922, at the peak of the development of the British Empire, a fifth of the world's population and a quarter of the total land area were under its authority. While proponents of the empire claim that it contributed to the economic development of controlled territories, critics point to massacres, famines, and concentration camps.
      Boer Concentration Camps
      Of the 107 thousand people stationed in the camps, nearly 28 thousand Boers died. The number of dead black Africans is unknown.
      Amritsar Massacre
      On April 13, 1919, peaceful protesters in the Indian city of Amritsar who marched against British colonial rule were blocked inside the walled Jallianwala Park and fired upon by Gurkha soldiers.
      By order of Brigadier General Reginald Dyer, the soldiers fired until the cartridges ran out. Within 10 minutes, 379 to a thousand protesters died; another 1, 1 thousand were injured.
      Subsequently, the British public exalted Dyer as a hero, collecting him 26 thousand pounds in gratitude.
      Division of India
      In 1947, Cyril Radcliffe was tasked to determine the border between India and the newly created state of Pakistan as soon as possible.
      After Radcliffe divided the subcontinent by religion, more than 10 million people (Hindus in Pakistan and Muslims in India) were forced to flee their homes as the situation quickly turned violent. According to some estimates, up to a million people died as a result of interfaith strife.
      Mau Mau Rebellion
      Thousands of elderly Kenyans filed a lawsuit against the British government for damages of £ 200 million. They accuse the British colonial forces of ill-treatment during the suppression of the Mau-Mau uprising (1951-1960). Representatives of the Kikuyu tribe were held in camps, where they claim to have been systematically tortured and abused.
      Estimates of the number of deaths vary widely: historian David Anderson counted 20 thousand, while Caroline Elkins claims that up to 100 thousand people could die.
      Famine in India
      During the period of British domination, 12 to 29 million Indians died of starvation. Millions of tons of wheat were exported to Britain, while India itself was sorely lacking food.
      So, in 1943, up to four million Bengalis died of starvation when Winston Churchill sent food to British soldiers and to countries such as Greece. Speaking of the 1943 Bengal famine, Churchill said: “I hate Hindus. Disgusting people with disgusting religion. They themselves are to blame for the famine, because they have bred like rabbits. ”
      http://warfiles.ru/show-107353-pyat-hudshih-zlodeyaniy-britanskoy-imperii.html

      So, "whose cow would moo ...."
  7. +1
    2 February 2016 12: 29
    Hehe, with a pig, only dead, they have a special premier.
  8. +2
    2 February 2016 12: 31
    And where are they (victorious information) they destroyed at least one group, or only the tongue of the tongue to hurt the professionals?
  9. +2
    2 February 2016 12: 34
    Apparently the gentleman was hurt if he no longer hopes to talk Russia out.
    Recent malicious tricks (Litvinenko, etc.) only confirm this.
  10. +2
    2 February 2016 12: 36
    cockroaches ran in, squealed, and Russia didn’t have time to listen to their nonsense; The IG only grew from their blows, and excavators are a significant shock to the IG
  11. +3
    2 February 2016 12: 38
    But our pilots simply have such a task,
    The order to execute without gasping or sighing:
    - With weapons on the side of the enemy - are you standing ???
    So - "daish" !!!))))))))))))))
    - "Milking" the blood of the Syrian people?!?
    Get "daish" from a Russian warrior !!! )))
  12. +1
    2 February 2016 12: 42
    Of course exacerbates. The rule of law is being restored, deliveries from partners are falling .... What else can he say? After all, did not even lie
  13. +1
    2 February 2016 12: 45
    “The Russians are undermining all our (West) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointment
    But he didn’t lie, we really undermine their efforts to destroy Syria’s statehood.
  14. +1
    2 February 2016 12: 45
    Are you nervous Mr. HAMAND? then we are on the right track! and justice will get to you)))) A terrible flatulence from their lips began after the recent victories in Syria SAR. laughing
  15. +2
    2 February 2016 12: 45
    What prevented them from resolving everything a couple of years ago without the Russians?
  16. +2
    2 February 2016 12: 46
    and why be surprised, hypocrisy has been the cornerstone of British policy for several centuries
    1. +2
      2 February 2016 13: 06
      All these Western and not only "strategists" in particular from the US Israel EU want now only one thing - to justify themselves from the fact that they created and supported the terrorists who tried to destroy Syria following the example of Libya.
      And only thanks exclusively to our country, the situation in Syria began to improve for the better. Of course, we must pay tribute to the Syrian army of Hezbollah to Iranian and Iraqi volunteers, but it was the Russian VKS that turned the tide in the country.
      The situation in the ATS.

      Red and pink - CAA and allies.
      Yellow - Kurds.
      Green and gray - SSA Al-Qaeda Al-Nusra DAISH (IG), but it must be borne in mind that although visually beneath them there is more territory, but for the most part it is a desert with saxaul and jerboas.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    2 February 2016 12: 59
    These "comrades" are the creators and ideologists of colonial policy. Great Britain became great at the expense of the colonies. As always, it is very difficult to come to terms with the loss of their influence in the region. And therefore, let us treat their hysterical antics and cries "with a high condescension" as to mentally unbalanced people.
  19. +3
    2 February 2016 12: 59
    Another bugger
  20. +1
    2 February 2016 13: 01
    if the British are unhappy, then the Russians are doing everything right.
  21. 0
    2 February 2016 13: 02
    It is now evident that Hammond is completely nonsense (yes, he himself understands this very well), however, if you manage to defeat Russia in any way (at least informatively), then after several generations many of his words may seem true (sadly ..).
  22. 0
    2 February 2016 13: 03
    What is good for the Russian and the Syrian is death for the British.
  23. +1
    2 February 2016 13: 17
    whose cow would mumble, and the British, in the person of Hammond, would be silent ...
  24. Fat
    +1
    2 February 2016 13: 18
    “The Russians are undermining all our (Western) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant frustration,” said Hammond during a visit to the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan. - They declare: let's negotiate. After that, they say, say and say, but the problem is that at the same time they are delivering bombing strikes, the purpose of which is to support President Assad. ”

    Great words. I would like to express "complete moral satisfaction" with the actions of the "bombers", "talking", undermining all of them (the West) effortswhich caused Mr. Hammond's "disappointment".
  25. +2
    2 February 2016 13: 24
    Some moron, how can such things be said out loud with such a mug.
  26. +1
    2 February 2016 13: 33
    The Russians undermine all our efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointment,

    I’m kind of disappointed all the time. Something awkward. By bombing, by bombing sand and hibernating. I wake up, Obama is rampaging, Erdogan is rampaging, Assad is being dismissed. I scold the obstinate Putin and a little easier. Then again I will be disappointed. So I live. Without a constitution. Want to cry!
  27. +1
    2 February 2016 13: 36
    Englishwoman crap !!! And what else remains for her.
  28. +2
    2 February 2016 13: 51
    "The Russians are undermining all our (Western) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant frustration."
    If the "gentlemen" are disappointed, then we are on the right track, comrades
  29. +2
    2 February 2016 14: 03
    "" The entire treasury - to war !!! " Alexander III was informed about a new geopolitical initiative of the British Cabinet of Turkey’s military revenge in order to implement the Palmerston partition of Russia. This threatened a possible military threat. In response to the report, the Emperor punched the table with his hand and threw only one phrase: "The entire treasury - to war !!!". According to some reports, the Tsar’s reaction was reported through spies to the British Prime Minister, the result was Britain’s refusal of the previously approved plan for a military campaign against Russia by Turkey’s hands. ”
    ―Alexander III
  30. 0
    2 February 2016 14: 09
    “Russians are undermining all of our (Western) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointment,” said Hammond.

    Vigorous Hamon !!! Look at the effort do not fart! (Or is he a boor?) He doesn’t care7
  31. 0
    2 February 2016 14: 10
    I don’t even understand, London wants to give the terrorists a respite so that they can patch up the holes and get back to work ?! And when did they merge their policy "We do not negotiate with terrorists"?
    And then, we have the task of transferring the entire territory under the control of a legitimate president or what ?!
  32. 0
    2 February 2016 14: 28
    yes in the face of vcdna what can it still say
  33. 0
    2 February 2016 15: 11
    Alla, I'm at the bar! (FROM). Only 30%? Something our falcons are lazy. In the beginning, due to the screaming cries, we generally only covered them. Nefik. Half-fidget in half-sneakers is a crappy invention. With weapons against the current government? Immediately nafik. Uncles sit with felt-tip pens and change half-tones to bearded men.
  34. +1
    2 February 2016 16: 15
    Russians undermine all our (West) efforts
    And all their efforts are nothing more than the capture of the entire Middle East, together with all resources. And now in the EU, not just civilians are already fleeing, but most likely militants hiding from complete destruction.
  35. +1
    2 February 2016 16: 28
    “Russians are undermining all of our (Western) efforts, which for me personally is a source of constant disappointment,” said Hammond.

    But how could it be otherwise ?! Of course you and not only you but people like you will be disappointed! lol Oil, and therefore income goes nowhere and not in your pocket! I’ll have to survive this opportunity wassat ..., yeah Yes But how did you think then and what ?! lol We will be tearing until we tear apart the whole rotten igil to a molecular state !!! am
  36. +2
    2 February 2016 16: 30
    "Russian airstrikes in Syria are aimed at supporting Assad and lead only from the escalation of the military conflict," reports TASS, a statement by British Foreign Minister Philip Hammond. What could have been the continuation of this delirium:
    I remember with the Americans, well, there are still 60 or 70 countries, I don’t remember exactly, they bombed all the deserts of the Middle East for 4 years, they stole oil from all who could and all Muslims were happy, and nothing about the Turks, and the Russians took destroyed this universal prosperity.
  37. +1
    2 February 2016 16: 34
    What a disgusting erysipelas !!!
  38. +1
    2 February 2016 17: 17
    Fine! The worse for all this western husk means the better for Syria and Russia. If the howl from the west intensifies, then EVERYTHING IS MAKING CORRECT!
  39. +2
    2 February 2016 18: 21
    The minister also criticized the actions of Iran, which "like Moscow does not put enough effort to resolve the conflict."Well, what can I do? Well, here we have different concepts about conflict resolution, and about decency, apparently, we also have different concepts, and life values ​​somehow do not quite coincide. In general, I am amazed at the endurance of our employees of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs - I would send these d..v on foot on an erotic journey several times a day, BUT POLITIOUS- you go- you go ......
  40. 0
    2 February 2016 22: 17
    Yes, blurted out for the rating.
  41. 0
    3 February 2016 04: 14
    I don’t understand for a long time, for whom are such statements made?
    For the Anglo-Saxons? So they are enemies - they do not care what to say. More precisely, you can not say anything - for them we are just enemies, an alien nation with an alien ideology.

    For Europe? So it’s been gone for a long time - it’s just gone, it is gone. At first it was mixed up and destroyed by authenticity, then it was corrupted by tolerance towards pederasts, and now it is simply destroyed by controlled flows of refugees. That’s all, Europe is no more. Moreover, in a couple of years, emigrants will begin to give birth (and they do not give birth to 1 child, as a rule). Europeans are now passionate about same-sex marriage or childfree, and emigrants breed like rabbits and have large families. In 10-20 years (when our children grow up. The next generation), this will become especially clear.

    For Africa, Asia and others? So they somehow generally even to our threes with pendos-ami generally violet.

    For Russia? Well, we still have Petrosyan, KVN and gum club with Ural dumplings are not funny.

    The less we (Russia) generally somehow respond to such brain farts, the better. How is it there? The dog barks, the wind wears, and the caravan goes ....
  42. 0
    3 February 2016 09: 59
    The least concern is the opinion of the representative of the colonial country about the actions of our troops abroad

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"