Military Review

Media: during the exercise, Britain did not dare to retaliate a nuclear strike on Russia

123
In Britain, a secret headquarters doctrine, involving the “use” of nuclear weapons leading world powers. Recently, his results were published, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with a link to the Daily Mail.


Media: during the exercise, Britain did not dare to retaliate a nuclear strike on Russia


“According to the teachings legend, riots broke out in eastern Latvia, pro-Russian forces seized 20 border towns. To support them, Moscow sent troops into the territory of a NATO member state. Among the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance, a split arose over the question of how to answer this. As a result, Washington and London decided to conduct a ground attack to oust the occupiers, ”says the British newspaper.

“Then Russia destroyed with a nuclear strike the English helicopter carrier Ocean, killed 1200 people. The committee, which included representatives of the government and military command of Great Britain, voted against delivering a retaliatory nuclear strike at an early stage of the crisis, ”writes the publication.

The US also lost a ship and people, but, unlike the British, they did not sit down - “they used nuclear weapons against the Russian military goal - thereby pushing England towards a full-scale atomic war,” the newspaper notes.

According to the article, “the committee gathered in the Whitehall bunker was faced with the need to take a decision in principle: to respond to a nuclear strike from Russia? And again, overwhelmingly voted against. "

“At that moment, it became clear that the policy of nuclear deterrence failed, and we were faced with a moral problem - the use of force can be justified only by preventing even more evil. However, if Britain is destroyed, what will we achieve by wiping out half of Russia from the face of the Earth? Only we will generate even worse evil, ”commented Sir Richard Shirrev, who until recently had been NATO Assistant Commander for Allies in Europe, commenting on the decision. “Are we meaninglessly killing millions of Russians or not?” It is easy for me to give an answer - we do not do that. ”

What it all ended with, and what the Russian Federation and the United States did, the publication did not report.

Help "WG": “According to official data, the United Kingdom has 225 thermonuclear warheads, 160 of which are on alert. The only means of delivering British nuclear weapons are Trident II ballistic missiles deployed on four atomic submarines in Scotland. Each submarine carries 16 missiles equipped with individual-guided combat units. At least one of the submarines is constantly on duty. "
Photos used:
Federal Government of the United States
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. St Petrov
    St Petrov 1 February 2016 14: 09
    32
    war is not always going according to plan. especially with Russians strong in their improvisation. so all this is nonsense.

    Fortune telling on coffee grounds. Who knows, who else pays the salary to the captain of the submarine, in addition to the British command. Maybe the CIA has long recruited him and he has his own instructions on the nuclear exchange of strikes - after all, it’s up to the launch.

    Well, or something like that. So many inputs and variables that planning such things is a thankless task

    1. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 1 February 2016 14: 10
      +8
      Pralna, the Saxons, the explosion of lemons in the toilet and on the football field - different types of destruction! According to the size of countries, the ratio is somewhere like that! hi
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 1 February 2016 14: 13
        38
        Well, you give a pancake ...))))
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 1 February 2016 17: 11
          +7
          They survived to what extent, without a team from the states they could not decide to use nuclear weapons, or they couldn’t reach a point ... laughing
          But seriously, this is a political stuffing (no one publishes his teachings in the press), it makes sense to show what kind of humanists they are
          Are we meaninglessly killing millions of Russians or not? It’s easy for me to give an answer - we don’t do it. ”
          and what a "bloodthirsty Russia
          Then Russia destroyed the British landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike, 1200 people died.
          The US also lost a ship and people

          Well, Well .... Dreams sometimes come true, like dreams, or whatever they say, "don't croak, or you'll make trouble" ... hi
          1. Alf
            Alf 1 February 2016 21: 02
            0
            Quote: NIKNN
            Well, Well .... Dreams come true sometimes like dreams, or whatever they say, "don't croak, or else you'll make trouble."

            Be afraid of your thoughts, they may come true.
      3. 79807420129
        79807420129 1 February 2016 14: 23
        56
        So the legend of the teachings, the pro-Russian separatists seized 20 cities in Latvia, laughed for a long time, they would have seized the whole bastard, together with the distant prostitute and the rest of the nonsense sprat condoms.
        1. PSih2097
          PSih2097 1 February 2016 14: 46
          +8
          Quote: 79807420129
          But why the hell do we need this spratland?

          how the hell, we will expel sprotland in the states and will control almost the entire Baltic ...
          1. Marconi41
            Marconi41 2 February 2016 04: 17
            0
            Quote: PSih2097
            we will expel sprotland to the states and we will control almost the entire Baltic

            We have created a shortage of sprat ??? Why do we need these lands, with people who hate us? And it’s more fun with them, they spit in the sky, make statements - beauty.
        2. Kent0001
          Kent0001 1 February 2016 14: 50
          +5
          The Anglo-Saxons are calculating the possible development of events with the destabilization of the situation in the Baltic states on their part. Baltic rag tigers are considered as a possible springboard for possible attacks on Russia. And spratland really and for nothing is needed to us.
          1. severniy
            severniy 1 February 2016 15: 00
            +7
            At least some share of the sire’s mind and logic remained, we are all on the same continent (read in the same boat), not like ghouls overseas. That all seems that they will sit out if the world-wide chuckler will ... fool
            1. Scraptor
              Scraptor 1 February 2016 20: 17
              0
              zaberingoprolivskie ... where will they sit? if only in Antarctica (TV series The Last Ship), but they were already there in 1947, after the Fulton speech, on the contrary, like "UFO" ... lol
        3. Vadim237
          Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 21
          +3
          Our entire Latvia would be captured during the night.
        4. FiremamRescueS
          FiremamRescueS 2 February 2016 10: 14
          0
          only one scenario of these exercises can cause tantrum among sprats.
        5. fraders
          fraders 3 February 2016 09: 43
          +1
          paid for the Baltic States with gold
      4. Voha_krim
        Voha_krim 1 February 2016 14: 27
        +8
        Quote: Major Yurik
        Pralna, the Saxons, the explosion of lemons in the toilet and on the football field - different types of destruction! According to the size of countries, the ratio is somewhere like that! hi

        It is not for nothing that NATO generals were recently indignant - Kaliningrad alone is "stuffed" to such an extent that it "will not work" to deliver a preventive democratizing strike against Russia.
        1. Igor V
          Igor V 1 February 2016 14: 40
          +6
          Not "only Kaliningrad", but also the region smile
      5. dyksi
        dyksi 1 February 2016 14: 39
        12
        That's for sure, during the conflict, Great Britain will very quickly turn into Nano-Great Britain, or "Atlantis", then don't go to a fortune-teller, the result is obvious.
        1. shalim
          shalim 1 February 2016 16: 24
          0
          United Kingdom)))
      6. ramzes1776
        ramzes1776 1 February 2016 18: 12
        +2
        They feel bastards that their island kirdyk at 100% will be here and plays a point.
    2. KAV
      KAV 1 February 2016 14: 16
      55
      This is not fortunetelling. This is a purposeful formation of public opinion against our country! What means
      Then Russia destroyed the British landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike, 1200 people died
      ??? Use nuclear weapons against some tattered helicopter carrier? The purpose of the use of nuclear weapons - 1200 people ?? But, nevertheless, like we were the first to apply it. That is the point of these types of teachings. Hollywood is not enough for them - now even here they began to spread their rotten fantasies ... At the same time, Britain was kind of kind, and for no reason did it want to strike back. I cry crocodile tears of tenderness !!!
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 1 February 2016 14: 19
        14
        “According to the legend of the exercises, riots broke out in the east of Latvia, pro-Russian forces captured 20 border cities.

        Yes, there are probably not so many cities throughout Latvia, but they are: "20 border towns ..." smile
        1. hartlend
          hartlend 1 February 2016 15: 00
          +5
          If they have more than 1000 inhabitants in a village, it’s already a city.
        2. Pirogov
          Pirogov 1 February 2016 18: 59
          +1
          Yes, there are probably not so many cities throughout Latvia, but they are: "20 border towns ..." ............................. ............................................... Day
          Tweetly .. July of that Latvia!
      2. St Petrov
        St Petrov 1 February 2016 14: 21
        14
        helicopter carrier (aircraft carrier) is with its guard. There, it will normally wash away all this coden of ships with a wave.

        It’s normal to hit the order of nuclear weapons. For this, there are plans and instructions are written and worked out on exercises.

        Only the number of deaths they clearly underestimated from this blow


        1. sufix
          sufix 1 February 2016 14: 31
          +9
          What is there to discuss. Propaganda and manipulation of public opinion. With a HYPOTHETIC attack by Russia on Latvia and the destruction of a helicopter carrier, a REAL opinion of readers is formed.
        2. KAV
          KAV 1 February 2016 15: 25
          +2
          So that's it. But in this case, either their cover group, contrary to everything, spread over a considerable diameter (or fell down in horror at the purpose of the cover), or we had some kind of jewelry rocket that only the helicopter carrier was wailing. It is practical to use nuclear weapons over large fleet groupings. Not the essence, actually. Here the whole point of this SECRET doctrine is that we were the first to use nuclear weapons, thereby violating our own doctrine. Yes, and then publish the results of the SECRET teaching. And this is never funny already. They already have it in Yankestan, more than half believe that we should be covered with vigorous weapons (there was somehow an experimental video survey of hot dogs on legs) ...
        3. Scraptor
          Scraptor 1 February 2016 20: 20
          0
          he has nothing to do in the Baltic Sea
      3. Muvka
        Muvka 1 February 2016 14: 48
        +3
        In addition to strategic nuclear weapons, there is also tactical. This is for example nuclear warhead calibers. And in this case it is quite justified.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 26
          0
          Tactical nuclear missiles with a range of more than 1000 kilometers will appear when we exit the INF Treaty.
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 1 February 2016 15: 38
            +2
            Does the Caliber-NK tell you anything?
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 50
              0
              I had in mind land-based missiles, and not sea-based, in our fleet of carriers of Caliber units.
              1. Scoun
                Scoun 1 February 2016 16: 07
                +1
                Quote: Vadim237
                I meant ground-based missiles,

                from land Iskander-M
                "Iskander" can deliver to the target cluster (with 54 warheads), penetrating, high-explosive fragmentation, and nuclear warheads. This makes it possible to hit small-sized and area targets, including enemy firepower, air defense and missile defense systems, aviation at airfields, command posts, etc.

                and there is also a "Point" which, if something happens, can deliver (at least theoretically) nuclear warheads for 500 km.
              2. Muvka
                Muvka 1 February 2016 16: 08
                +1
                Really? All Warsaw and Lada at least can. If you dig around, then they are on other submarines. About surface I generally am silent.
      4. Scoun
        Scoun 1 February 2016 15: 10
        +1
        Quote: KAV
        Use nuclear weapons against some tattered helicopter carrier? The purpose of the use of nuclear weapons - 1200 people ??

        why are you actually surprised?
        what artillery nuclear ammunition is for special ammunition 3VB2 and 3VB4 and in air defense there were missiles with nuclear warheads for the S-75 and S-200.
        damn picture is not attached
      5. Scoun
        Scoun 1 February 2016 15: 14
        +1
        Quote: KAV
        Use nuclear weapons against some tattered helicopter carrier? The purpose of the use of nuclear weapons - 1200 people ??

        here is a visual picture .. think of 100000 thousand? )))
      6. anfil
        anfil 1 February 2016 15: 16
        11
        We have better weapons than nuclear ones, electronic warfare turns off all British channels and plays a cartoon about Leopold the cat - "Guys, let's live together!" lol
      7. nikpwolf
        nikpwolf 1 February 2016 21: 12
        +1
        Quote: KAV
        This is not fortunetelling. This is a purposeful formation of public opinion against our country! What means
        Then Russia destroyed the British landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike, 1200 people died
        ??? Use nuclear weapons against some tattered helicopter carrier? The purpose of the use of nuclear weapons - 1200 people ?? But, nevertheless, like we were the first to apply it. That is the point of these types of teachings. Hollywood is not enough for them - now even here they began to spread their rotten fantasies ... At the same time, Britain was kind of kind, and for no reason did it want to strike back. I cry crocodile tears of tenderness !!!

        That's exactly 100 !!! Their tolerant electorate will happily devour everything. They have nowhere to go illogical. Well this is beyond logic - "A secret headquarters exercise was held in Great Britain, which provides for the" use "of nuclear weapons by the leading world powers. Recently, its results were published ...". It's good that it's not published in comics ... "DB" ...
      8. cap
        cap 2 February 2016 02: 43
        0
        Quote: KAV
        This is not fortunetelling. This is a purposeful formation of public opinion against our country! What means
        Then Russia destroyed the British landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike, 1200 people died
        ??? Use nuclear weapons against some tattered helicopter carrier? The purpose of the use of nuclear weapons - 1200 people ?? But, nevertheless, like we were the first to apply it. That is the point of these types of teachings. Hollywood is not enough for them - now even here they began to spread their rotten fantasies ... At the same time, Britain was kind of kind, and for no reason did it want to strike back. I cry crocodile tears of tenderness !!!


        I read this news, my hair stand on end!
        If this is a training plan, I want to ask which one ... wrote it.
        I’ll say it more simply. If the conversation is about the use of nuclear weapons, no one will probably ever knock on the clave and fill in coordinates, an iron trough at sea. The beginning of ANY operation on someone else’s theater of operations involves first of all putting the troops on alert. For nuclear weapons delivery means to areas of combat deployment, or transition to readiness No. 1 for mine-based missiles, the same for submarines located on the database. ON ALL! Target carriers are set up ADVANCE.
        Targets under the numbers. The number is dialed as "call a friend" and "goodbye gentlemen"! Helicopter carrier in Greenland with a crew within an hour, Britain in northern Canada. Washington DC on Easter Island. Then cartographers and dosimetrists work. The war is over.
        Something like this. I forgot who we attacked there. The Baltic seems.
        So her wave washed away !.
        For ....... from NATO. For 2016, the General Staff of Russia plans to conduct 100! (One hundred) combat training deployments of the Strategic Missile Forces as part of combat training. This is open data so that every third day of the year they do not forget to pray in the morning and enjoy the sun and peace in the world. all I wanted to say was "about the teachings."
    3. Lissyara
      Lissyara 1 February 2016 14: 30
      +5
      And you, sir, with a bang, will you be able to reprogram SSBNs for launch? Or do they carry "hackers" on boats for CIA money?
      Although Britain is our "potential friend" (as there is about a dog with a cat - "You are my friend, comrade and dinner"), but nevertheless it is an independent state.
      And about the cities in Latvia ...
      I counted them all there 6:
      Ludza, Balvi, Preili, Rezekne, Daugavpils, Kraslava. The rest of the village.
      1. quote
        quote 1 February 2016 14: 38
        +2
        The war was "lost", but for that at least "SMOKE" on the couch !!
        However, if Britain is destroyed, what will we achieve by wiping out half of Russia from the face of the earth?
        Touching! Erasing half of Russia from the face of the Earth? Helicopter carriers (priority goals! The highest threat. Only nuclear weapons are destroyed!)?
      2. Oladushkin
        Oladushkin 1 February 2016 14: 51
        0
        Well, as if there are at least two more: Riga and Jelgava (before 1945 -Mitava)
    4. marlin1203
      marlin1203 1 February 2016 14: 36
      +2
      Not "at least one of the submarines is on alert," but only one and barely. And another big question, will she have time to shoot if her entire SF "graze" will be. And then they play in humanism, you see ...soldier
    5. Oleg7700
      Oleg7700 1 February 2016 15: 19
      +1
      Indeed, ungrateful ... For example, in Israel, due to the lack of strategic depth and time for doubts and conversations, the conditional "red buttons" are in the hands of the General Staff, not the cabinet of ministers, and are used in the skynet mode ...
    6. 222222
      222222 1 February 2016 15: 26
      +3
      Great Britain refused, and the United States delivered a nuclear strike on Russian targets during the KSHU .. what happens?
      ... is that a mutiny on a ship .. "NATO" ... or "no one wanted to die" ..for it is not clear whose interests .. ?? or England leaves NATO AND the EU ??
    7. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 1 February 2016 15: 48
      +1
      Quote: s-t Petrov
      Well, or something like that.

      These Englishmen, such as Russia, destroyed the NUCLEAR PUNCH OF A HELICOPTER AND TP! Haha? Cruise missile and all! They can’t even do military exercises intelligently. However, the exercises were exercises, but there was a reality, naturally, it hides: infa, although old, but still:
      After March 15, Britain was preparing the first nuclear strike on Russia?
      http://www.newscom.md/rus/posle-15-marta-velikobritaniya-gotovila-pervij-yaderni

      j-udar-po-rossii.html
    8. Allend
      Allend 1 February 2016 16: 11
      0
      in this context, the captain of the nuclear submarine is not interested in anyone; he can’t do anything on his own to launch nuclear weapons without receiving the appropriate codes.
      1. RussiaSILA
        RussiaSILA 1 February 2016 17: 34
        0
        Media: during the exercise, Britain did not dare to retaliate a nuclear strike on Russia


        The British simply realized that after Russia they would not be able to strike back because Britain would no longer be on the ground) therefore, why strain on the exercises)))
    9. Alekseev
      Alekseev 1 February 2016 19: 01
      0
      Quote: s-t Petrov
      who else pays a salary to the captain of the submarine, besides the British command. Maybe the CIA a long time ago

      CIA recruited? smile
      Maybe, maybe. The main thing is that in spite of attempts at missile defense, the CIA did not "enlist" the US invulnerability from a nuclear strike.
      Why is the United States better in this regard of Great Britain? There will be nothing left of Britain, but much can survive from the USA, as well as from the Russian Federation?
      So I don’t think that these common truths are not available to the American government. After all, there are no guarantees that in such an "evil case" they themselves and their children will survive. And beloved relatives, not to mention business.
      Therefore, various notions that Washington or London, or, all the more, Paris are ready to risk themselves for Erdogan, for example, are far from reality.
      They have always agreed and will continue to do so.
      The main thing is not to defend ourselves ... as the Kremlin elders and their successor Mishka Mechenyy once did.
  2. Putinets
    Putinets 1 February 2016 14: 09
    +9
    Yes, they won’t think for a second and apply it, if at least 20 percent of them are left with the opportunity to leave with impunity. What is the moral of hyenas?
  3. Woodman
    Woodman 1 February 2016 14: 10
    +7
    "Then Russia destroyed with a nuclear strike the English landing helicopter carrier

    Well, there’s nothing more than that, it’s a HELICOPTER, here it’s immediately vigorous with a loaf and shied away)))
    1. vch62388
      vch62388 1 February 2016 14: 18
      +4
      Our people were so scared of the reinforced battalion, sailing past Baltiysk (BVMB), that they already forgot about the rest of the means. Oh yes, I forgot, everything else is rusty ...)))
  4. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 1 February 2016 14: 10
    14
    Once a student asked the Master:
    -How long to wait for a change for the better?
    -If you wait, then a long time! - answered the Master.
  5. The black
    The black 1 February 2016 14: 11
    +8
    In my opinion, under the guise of refugees, drug couriers made their way to Britain, who sold their goods near the British General Staff laughing
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 1 February 2016 14: 44
      +3
      Britain herself whoever you want to prescribe drug couriers and drugs at the same time. They actually ate a dog
  6. Dimontius
    Dimontius 1 February 2016 14: 12
    0
    Oh thanks, reassured! But well done, that you understand that you will not get such generosity from us!
  7. ded100
    ded100 1 February 2016 14: 12
    10
    And their legend is crooked and not iron! laughing
    1. Mihalich17
      Mihalich17 1 February 2016 14: 15
      +6
      I completely agree with you, comrade! )))
      "- Do you believe in fairy creatures?
      - I personally know a few fabulous dolbo ::: bov. "
  8. _my opinion
    _my opinion 1 February 2016 14: 12
    +3
    Media: during the exercise, Britain did not dare to retaliate a nuclear strike on Russia

    you look what kind people, and what evil Russia laughing
    what is this secret teaching, if a newspaper trumpets it?
    already concealed by their antics, and they and the American authorities.
  9. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 1 February 2016 14: 13
    0
    This is of course after the Russian nuclear attack! Tolerance, what!
  10. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 1 February 2016 14: 13
    +1
    The information circulated by the media about these exercises does not say that what did Russia do with the USA.

  11. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 1 February 2016 14: 14
    +1
    Forgot to continue the name with the words: since there was no one to answer!
  12. 31rus
    31rus 1 February 2016 14: 15
    0
    Dear, it is reasonable on the part of Great Britain, otherwise there will be no "Foggy Albion" in nature, moreover, this once again emphasizes that the EU is a real screen for the US plans, even the scenario of the exercises speaks for itself
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 1 February 2016 14: 23
      +1
      Quote: 31rus
      that the EU is a real screen for US plans, even the scenario of the exercises speaks for itself

      Oh, and the kids with matches will play out!
  13. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 1 February 2016 14: 17
    +3
    And with Latvia, how did the deal end was not reported?
    1. Gormenghast
      Gormenghast 1 February 2016 14: 20
      +3
      Which Latvia? laughing
    2. APS
      APS 1 February 2016 14: 24
      +2
      They could not read the script to the end - they ran away ...
    3. Igor V
      Igor V 1 February 2016 14: 25
      +1
      Latvia itself will soon end.
    4. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 31
      0
      Full seizure of the entire territory by Russian troops.
  14. APS
    APS 1 February 2016 14: 17
    +1
    Yes, the script is cooler than that of Indian fighters. laughing For whom it was interesting to try?
    1. rusmat73
      rusmat73 1 February 2016 16: 16
      0
      I think the information stuffing continues - they are preparing their electorate to the idea that Russia is enemy No. 1 yes ... forgot the sick history .... am
      do not even think that only the name "Europe" will remain as well as "Atlantis"!
      and the mattress covers will go under water with Japan. crying
      many smart thinking people from the usa and england move to live in Russia, get citizenship - they understand the meaning of life and think about the future. yes
  15. Ugrumiy
    Ugrumiy 1 February 2016 14: 17
    +3
    And what was necessary for our atomic bomb on the Anglo-Highway to shy away, we would calibrate it laughing
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 1 February 2016 14: 23
      +2
      Quote: Ugrumiy
      would calibrate it

      They have no practice to calibrate, but they have a strategy for using tactical nuclear weapons. So they "against themselves" and used nuclear weapons. I think that ours would have had enough submarines to prevent the Anglo-Saxons from opening the local "eastern front" of support for the Balts. And the Balts should be as dumb now!
  16. Cobra77
    Cobra77 1 February 2016 14: 19
    +2
    "Russia destroyed the British landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike" - in this case, it is reckless to use nuclear weapons on enemy territory. This will only lead to unpredictable escalation. The loss of one ship is not very scary, in contrast to the impact on cities. In general, the Brits decided correctly. We would have decided exactly the same.

    "used nuclear weapons against a Russian military target" - but the Americans played too much. If this goal were on the territory of the Russian Federation, it is difficult to predict what would happen next. For example, amers have a lot of military bases around the world. What will happen if a couple of three of them arrive by half a megaton?
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 1 February 2016 14: 26
      0
      What it all ended with, and what the Russian Federation and the United States did, the publication did not report.

      Maybe this was the next step, and then HOW IT HAPPENED !!!
      Yes, I wonder who they had for their GDP.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 1 February 2016 15: 17
      +1
      "In general, the brits decided right" ///

      I think so too. There, as it turned out, responsible people are sitting there at the General Staff.
      The loss of one ship (even as a result of a nuclear strike)
      can be retaliated by destroying an enemy ship or base
      conventional CD.
      And save 200 hydrogen warheads as a last resort.
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 34
      0
      Yes, they will not have enough warheads with the United States to cover all our military facilities - and you are talking about cities.
  17. pavelty
    pavelty 1 February 2016 14: 21
    +1
    was it scary? it's good.
  18. The black
    The black 1 February 2016 14: 22
    +1
    A TASK:
    According to the legend of the exercises, riots began in the east of Latvia, pro-Russian forces captured 20 border cities. To support them, Moscow deployed troops to the territory of a NATO member state. Among the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance, a split arose over the question of how to respond to this. As a result, Washington and London decided to carry out a ground attack in order to oust the invaders, "... then Russia destroyed the English landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike, 1200 people died

    TO FIND: Which of the AngLi Generals sells Afghan heroin? smile
  19. MARGADON
    MARGADON 1 February 2016 14: 22
    +3
    What’s called play out. What kind of helicopter carrier will shoot down a nuclear charge and wait for the enemy’s reaction. Though the media wouldn’t throw away their crazy games.
  20. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 1 February 2016 14: 27
    +1
    They used to be friends ... am
  21. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 1 February 2016 14: 28
    +1
    They did not write the main thing - is there much left of the USA after our reply?
  22. lex locis
    lex locis 1 February 2016 14: 29
    +3
    However, if Britain is destroyed,
    And at the same time, America ...
    That makes no sense to bomb the Russians ...
    Now, if with impunity, then without thinking.
    Hurray to our VKS, Navy and other allies of Russia represented by the ordinary army ...
  23. Simon
    Simon 1 February 2016 14: 30
    0
    Yes ... well, apparently the sensible UM began to appear among the British! And the rest - like Obama.
    1. Mihalich17
      Mihalich17 1 February 2016 14: 38
      +1
      Few people know, but the famous phrase of the Pink Floyd group "We don't need no education ..." can be translated as "How we were fools, fools and we will die !!!")))
  24. Cobra77
    Cobra77 1 February 2016 14: 31
    +1
    Quote: MainBeam
    What it all ended with, and what the Russian Federation and the United States did, the publication did not report.

    Maybe this was the next step, and then HOW IT HAPPENED !!!
    Yes, I wonder who they had for their GDP.


    McCain would have played for him smile They have such an association with GDP.
  25. salad
    salad 1 February 2016 14: 31
    0
    What controls the brains of subhumans from these countries?
  26. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 1 February 2016 14: 32
    0
    If the Russian nuclear submarines wake up constantly on duty near the British Isles with a "Caliber" on board and even with a nuclear warhead, then the Queen of England is awakened by insomnia. smile
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 38
      0
      Yes, there the flight time of warheads is only 6-7 minutes - the guys will not have time to launch their own.
  27. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 1 February 2016 14: 35
    0
    I’ve only one thing, I didn’t understand: Why the hell, that would sink the helicopter carrier, nuclear weapons ??? request Smoke too, something?
  28. Wolka
    Wolka 1 February 2016 14: 38
    +1
    that the Saxons were depressed, no way .... point played
  29. Papapg
    Papapg 1 February 2016 14: 43
    +1
    Quote: Volka
    that the Saxons were depressed, no way .... point played

    It's just that they have a vigorous button called "SELF SECURITY".
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 1 February 2016 15: 06
      0
      Quote: Papapg
      the vigorous button is called "SELF-SILICATION".

      not - "Overload"and in Russian letters
  30. el coyote
    el coyote 1 February 2016 14: 47
    +2
    Quote: Observer 33
    I’ve only one thing, I didn’t understand: Why the hell, that would sink the helicopter carrier, nuclear weapons ??? request Smoke too, something?

    And we in Mother Russia always when we get vodka from matryoshka dolls and lubricate our Kalashnikov rifle, we start throwing left and right with nuclear missiles.

    As far as I understand, they still believe in "cartoon" nuclear weapons, nuclear clouds from which do not move anywhere, the consequences of an explosion are always exclusively local, tectanic movements from such explosions have no effect on anything, the water layers, if they do not deteriorate, then too don't move anywhere. And what is the attitude to the gentlemen, shying nuclear weapons do not need to say. I'm not even talking about the fact that shooting from our nuclear matches at the Bear with a multi-thousand missile arsenal is an awesome idea.
  31. uskrabut
    uskrabut 1 February 2016 14: 49
    +2
    - Where are you going to go on vacation?
    - On a British cruise
    “And the next day?”

    "I just did not understand one thing: Why the heck, what would sink the helicopter carrier, nuclear weapons ???"
    Caliber saved
  32. PBF
    PBF 1 February 2016 14: 50
    0
    As a result, Washington and London decided to launch a ground attack. Neighing! laughing And that Australia was not invited to participate? She seems not too far away either.
  33. ser-pov
    ser-pov 1 February 2016 14: 56
    0
    Quote: Gormengast
    The information circulated by the media about these exercises does not say that what did Russia do with the USA.

    The press release read: "And in the US there was already no one to answer ..." wink
  34. brasist
    brasist 1 February 2016 14: 59
    +2
    “According to the legend of the exercises, riots broke out in the east of Latvia, pro-Russian forces captured 20 border cities. To support them, Moscow deployed troops to the territory of a NATO member state. Among the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance, a split arose over the question of how to respond to this. In the end, Washington and London decided to launch a ground offensive to oust the occupiers

    Where the troops entered and why the Baltic states (if, according to our teachings) have not existed for about ten minutes, and while Washington and London will make their way through the ruins of pro-Russian forces, they will shoot them from slingshots. It’s necessary for them to publish something like this according to legend, the teachings may happen ...
  35. Stauffenberg
    Stauffenberg 1 February 2016 15: 05
    +2
    According to legend, after 20 days, the Latvians noticed that they had captured 20 cities.
  36. tomcat117
    tomcat117 1 February 2016 15: 05
    +1
    ... during the exercise, Britain did not dare to retaliate against Russia ...

    On the reciprocal there will not be enough anyone there, but with the wrong hands (such as stubborn Ukrainians) or proactive ...
    Do not believe Britons. Like a cat, a lullaby, lulls and strikes stealthily.
    This statement is for external use, and so will be applied with amerikos for a couple, how to give a drink.
  37. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 1 February 2016 15: 06
    0
    staff secret teaching
    Oh yo, I had to add London scribes super super peculiarsecret doctrine (after all, nuclear weapons are not a pound of raisins) .You see that British scientists in England have ended and now the journalists have switched to military archives. There, in general, they give a deadline for such sensational leaks. And not a dime, but like in all normal countries --- up to a lifetime laughing .
  38. Mixweb
    Mixweb 1 February 2016 15: 06
    +1
    Here is scream laughing nuclear attack on a helicopter carrier laughing Yes, in the event of a conflict he will not even be able to swim to our shores, just one hit by a torpedo or cr. rockets. On ships of this class, armor is serious armor and there is no defense system. Now, if tens of 5 large-tonnage enemy ships were crowded around a helicopter carrier, then a nuclear strike would be justified. Well, the loss would be 300-400 thousand people.
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 1 February 2016 15: 36
      +1
      Zenit is a champion! Not in the subject, but from the heart :)
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 47
      +1
      It turns out that on each of these 5 large-tonnage vessels, there will be 30-40 thousand people - what kind of vessels are these - landing tankers with cannon fodder probably?
  39. Bedrovich
    Bedrovich 1 February 2016 15: 09
    0
    Let's play in the Latvian cities. Wikipedia says that the status of the city is assigned to 76 settlements.
  40. Vadim237
    Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 19
    0
    If necessary, these British Tridents can also deliver 14 kiloton warheads for each ICBM.
  41. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 1 February 2016 15: 19
    +1
    The topic of a possible limited nuclear conflict is very interesting. It is clear that everyone is afraid to deliver a nuclear strike on the territory of the country, a member of the nuclear club. An answer will follow. But what will happen if a nuclear strike is launched against enemy troops located outside the national territories of a country with nuclear weapons? Our troops abroad are very few. But the USA, England and France have a lot. So the British are rightly afraid.
  42. skrabplus.ru
    skrabplus.ru 1 February 2016 15: 20
    0
    Quote: 79807420129
    So the legend of the teachings, the pro-Russian separatists seized 20 cities in Latvia, laughed for a long time, they would have seized the whole bastard, together with the distant prostitute and the rest of the nonsense sprat condoms.

    captured only 20 cities - so as not to humiliate proud Latvians
    en.wikipedia.org ›Cities of Latvia
    In Latvia, city status (Latvian: pilsēta) has been assigned to 76 settlements. Of these, 9 have the status of republican cities, 67 - the status of regional cities.
  43. Boulochkin
    Boulochkin 1 February 2016 15: 21
    +3
    Anglo-Saxons and FALSE, concepts are inherent.
    1. Throw in, afraid.
    2. Do not want to disappear in the otvetka.
    3. To blunt vigilance (of type).
    4. In any case, critters, DESTROY !, in any case!
  44. victorklestov
    victorklestov 1 February 2016 15: 26
    +1
    Yes, well, and the idea of ​​our "Western partners" about our use of nuclear weapons, why use them against a helicopter carrier? You can get by with conventional rockets.
  45. Stinger
    Stinger 1 February 2016 15: 28
    +1
    The United States also lost the ship and its people, but, unlike the British, they did not sit back - “they used nuclear weapons against the Russian military target - thereby pushing England to a full-scale nuclear war”
    For this, NATO was created. Snoop and sit out overseas. The result of the exercise: Poisoned the idiots. Protected. Counted. Only from Latvia and England not a damn left. We decided. that just yapping because of the fence is safer.
    1. rusmat73
      rusmat73 1 February 2016 16: 18
      0
      + 100!!! yes I just think that it’s necessary to add Europe to Latvia and England! lol
  46. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 1 February 2016 15: 35
    +2
    Already a tear came from the nobility of the arrogant Saxons. If they had not spoiled us secretly over large and small things for centuries, I would even have believed. May be.
  47. Proud.
    Proud. 1 February 2016 15: 35
    +2
    "... Then Russia destroyed the British landing helicopter carrier Ocean with a nuclear strike, 1200 people died ..." - Attention, a question! Or rather two: What power is needed for the "nuclear gift" on the helicopter carrier?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 1 February 2016 15: 54
      +2
      Three kiloton torpedoes will be more than enough.
  48. Swed
    Swed 1 February 2016 15: 45
    +2
    And I thought it was an exuberant fantasy :) We are drowning the English landing helicopter carrier Ocean by NUCLEAR, and for this they decide to destroy the half of Russia or not ... belay ... Further comment does not see the point.
  49. Jackking
    Jackking 1 February 2016 16: 01
    +2
    The authors of the teachings have to go to a room with soft walls and dozens of orderlies.
  50. Maksim
    Maksim 1 February 2016 16: 05
    +2
    Quote: Oleg7700
    Indeed, ungrateful ... For example, in Israel, due to the lack of strategic depth and time for doubts and conversations, the conditional "red buttons" are in the hands of the General Staff, not the cabinet of ministers, and are used in the skynet mode ...

    And that Irzayil has nuclear weapons? Have you confessed? or is it "the most cunning of all"?