Media: the West is trying to persuade Libya to allow the deployment of British soldiers in the country

45
The British Defense Ministry and the Pentagon are negotiating with Libya, during which thousands of British troops are trying to convince the government of the need to deploy 1 in the country to strengthen the anti-Igilov forces, reports RIA News post The Times.



"The US and British military, diplomats and intelligence officers make frequent trips to Libya in order to identify the most influential allies from various rebel groups and incline them to a common fight against IS, the number of militants in Libya is about 3 thousand people", - writes newspaper.

It is noted that these measures are "being taken against the background of the statement by French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian that the terrorist network is spreading to Libya and already controls the Mediterranean coast of the country." Such a situation creates a real danger that terrorists will mix with migrants and with them penetrate into Europe.

"About 1, thousands of British soldiers were reserved to join the troops under the command of Italy to train the Libyan military," the newspaper writes, noting that It was".

Britain, France and the United States agree that "it is necessary to take military action before the IG becomes an integral feature of Libya," the newspaper notes.

According to the newspaper’s military source, “Washington and London have developed a plan to support the Libyan army, as well as to apply new air strikes against the positions of the IG.”
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    1 February 2016 10: 44
    Chet, I did not understand - with which of the governments do they want to agree?
    1. +5
      1 February 2016 10: 45
      Quote: GRAY
      Chet, I did not understand - with which of the governments do they want to agree?


      And where is the government army? belay
      1. +3
        1 February 2016 10: 52
        Quote: cniza
        And where is the government army?

        There, every Mujahid who follows the path of light is his own government.
        1. +1
          1 February 2016 10: 57
          From the text of the article
          Britain, France and the United States agree that "it is necessary to take military action before IS becomes an integral feature of Libya"

          Yes indeed, measures must be taken against Daesh in Libya, only Libya does not suspiciously ask for anything. Or is she not hoping for the American coalition and not trusting the British?
        2. WKS
          0
          1 February 2016 11: 30
          Quote: GRAY
          There, every Mujahid who follows the path of light is his own government.

          They will come to an agreement with some "mujahid". Only it is not clear who England will send there? And for what purpose? And what can this thousand people do there?
          1. hartlend
            0
            1 February 2016 15: 46
            It is written that they will train. Nobody wants to fight, only valuable advice is given.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +11
        1 February 2016 10: 57
        the need to deploy 1 thousand British troops on the territory of the country to strengthen the anti-Ghill forces,

        Well, believe ....! Protect the rocking horses ... Here are the bastards! Such a country was completely destroyed, do you need to finish it off?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      1 February 2016 10: 53
      with those who torn the American ambassador ...
    4. -1
      1 February 2016 11: 24
      Chet, I did not understand - with which of the governments do they want to agree?

      And it doesn’t matter to them, only who would allow it, and then it’s a matter of technology. As with the Indians in America.
      request
      1. +1
        1 February 2016 11: 46
        Stupidly stupid and not professional, negotiate with the bandits. After the revolution and several years of banditry, people with nostalgia remember Gaddafi. If you want something to come to peace in Libya, you must negotiate with the lieutenant general. She can raise such a wave on nostalgia, in five minutes the people will cleanse Libya from terrorists.
        For the first time in four years, since November 2011, the daughter of Muammar Gaddafi Aisha appealed to the Libyans. As follows from two published letters, she is in Eritrea after the "captivity" in Algeria and Oman. Aisha Gaddafi first made herself known after fleeing from Algeria to Oman to become a leader of resistance at a crucial moment for the country - on the eve of a new NATO intervention. As a lieutenant general of the Libyan army, she reported allegiance to the work of her legendary father and urged the Libyans to “wake up” to win the victory in order to “return the Jamahiriya to power.”
    5. 0
      1 February 2016 11: 25
      The British Ministry of Defense and the Pentagon are in talks with Libya, during which they are trying to convince the government of the need to deploy 1 thousand British troops in the country

      What ?! World democracy asks permission to send their troops for anti-terrorist operations ?!
      Hm, bright news from the first of February!
      Previously, in my opinion, they only invaded, but here ...
      Somewhere Bobby died ...
    6. +1
      1 February 2016 11: 26
      Chet, I did not understand - with which of the governments do they want to agree?

      ... apparently they agree through mega-speakers ... something at once with everyone
    7. +2
      1 February 2016 11: 40
      An officially recognized government is located in Tobruk. But it is incompetent without Haftar, who holds the territory to Benghazi (with the exception of the enclaves of the IG, Alkaida Marib and Benghazi itself, where there has been a layer cake for a year and a half, there are all IG, Marib, Dawn of Libya, Haftar, just babahis, just bandits, mercenaries) .

      All west to Sirte - holds the Dawn of Libya, which is not recognized by the west. These are "secular nationalists" from among those who overthrew Gaddafi, but who were pushed away from the trough. They took Tripoli and hooked on Benghazi. Now their situation is worsening, since it is on their territory that IS is now active, and the largest of the operating oil terminals, Es-Sidr (from which the loot went to the Dawn of Libya) is closed for rediscounting after a week of fighting and massive explosions of feeding storage facilities.

      Haftar and Dawn of Libya have their own helicopters and combat aircraft, actively using them. At Dawn, even the MiG-25 was, however, defeated in the third or fourth sortie with barrels in Benghazi.
    8. 0
      1 February 2016 12: 00
      Quote: GRAY
      Chet, I did not understand - with which of the governments do they want to agree?

      --------------------------
      Most likely in Benghazi. They need a port and oil fields. On Libya itself they FSUs. 1000 people can’t get anywhere else. They don’t represent any military force. And just to protect the oil industry. Perimeter observation towers, minefields on the way, access control.
      1. 0
        1 February 2016 14: 19
        Quote: Altona
        Most likely in Benghazi. They need a port and oil fields.

        one hundred%!!! +++
        First of all, their goal is to take control of ports and oil terminals and consolidate their presence in the region.
      2. +1
        1 February 2016 14: 27
        Quote: Altona
        Most likely in Benghazi.

        Is this with the one who is sitting on the raid, aboard some pelvis, and is afraid to go ashore?
        In general, they have fun there:
        Channel Libya
        Tuesday, December 29, 2015

        The Benghazi Shura of robberies [SHRB] rebuffed the accusations made by the Islamic state in Libya after a propaganda video appeared condemning the so-called apostates.

        In a written statement circulated online on Monday, the bandit coalition firmly denied claims of "their alliance with the West" and "idol worship."

        “We wrote this statement after much effort trying to reach the people from the Islamic State who released these lies about us,” reads Shura's statement of the Benghazi robberies.

        "We were called" part of the global infidels "such as the United States and Russia, in addition to what they called" the al-Lat party "- they refer to the pre-Islamic Arab goddess al-Lat, who was revered in the Mecca region and was" condemned "by the prophet Muhammad.

        “By accusing the Shura Benghazi robberies, ISIS itself“ delegitimized ”. And time reveals their hidden plan,” the robbers say.

        The statement was released on Monday after a four-minute video appeared on December 21, condemning ISIS enemies, including other rival jihadist groups that work in the West.

        The clip shows the American flag unfurled in front of the emblems of various robbery groups, including the Benghazi robbery Shura.

        The Shura was formed in June 2014, a month after the outbreak of the war by former Colonel Khalifa Haftar, a rogue, traitor [and CIA agent], later appointed leader of the "Libyan" armed forces.

        Among the coalition of robberies and jihadists, the Ansar al-Sharia group was declared a terrorist organization by the UN, there was also "Qatar Shield" No. 1, part of the "state" robberies deployed in various parts of the country, whose mandate had expired.

        Since then, both sides have fought a bitter war over territory in Benghazi. After the Fajarniki - allies of the Shura of the Benghazi robberies in the West - seized control of Tripoli last summer, they appointed a "rival parliament" and "government" and the battle for Benghazi became part of an ongoing civil war.

        In the midst of chaos, ISIS flourished, expanding its territory in the center of the country and taking the oath as a guarantee of loyalty, including from individual robberies from the groups that make up Shura.

        In a statement Monday, the Shura of the robberies cited their war against the Haftaris - now the "official" "Libyan" "army" - as ISIS also accused them of "sympathy for Haftar."

        1. +1
          1 February 2016 14: 28
          Banquet Continuation:
          A statement from the Shura of Benghazi robberies came after a recent statement by jihadists from the western part of the city of Misurata, who declared their allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. The recently formed Shura of Misurata robberies - which is believed to have launched several attacks on the fazer positions around the city - made a statement in a short video clip.

          Misuratyan robberies called on other groups to join ISIS and form ISIS armed groups across the country.

          Nonetheless, the so-called Derna robbery Shura expressed support in the "announced" PNS with conditions in its carefully worded statement.

          The Shura of the Dernah robbers (al-Qaeda - transl.) Said that she "will support" any "government" that puts Sharia law at the core.

          "We fully support 'any dialogue' and 'any government' on the condition that Sharia law is the only source of legislation and that any law that contradicts it will be rejected," it said in a statement released last Wednesday.

          The Shura of the Derna (al-Qaeda) robberies are hard-line jihadists, but they staged an uprising along with the residents of Derna and drove ISIS out of "their" city last June. ISIS has now been forced to attack from the rural areas surrounding the city after losing its first foothold in Libya when it first appeared in the country late last year.

          The ISIS robberies moved their base in the central part to the city of Sirte, from where they recently launched attacks eastward towards Ajdabiya and westward towards Misurata.
    9. 0
      1 February 2016 12: 55
      With his. This is a new colonial policy. Why buy resources? You can buy rulers, reinforce their power with your army and the threat from evil jihadists, and pump oil with your companies for nothing, on the basis of agreements on the separation of raw materials. Who knows how much you pumped out? We take 10, write 1, and even then divide by 4, since it is necessary to recoup the costs of oil companies. Alo, Libya? Congratulations you suckers! The country has been stolen from you, now the bowels will be stolen and forgive goodbye, again in the Middle Ages!
    10. +1
      1 February 2016 13: 26
      Good friends with the Libyans appeared, they first bombed the house and now they ask for a barn in the yard.
  2. +1
    1 February 2016 10: 45
    «Washington and London developed a plan to support the Libyan army, as well as to inflict new airstrikes on IS positions. ”

    The main thing is to comply with polites. Abominationdamn nnn! am
    1. +3
      1 February 2016 11: 05
      Quote: V.ic
      The main thing is to comply with polites. Abomination, damn it!


      Not certainly in that way. The main task of the occupation forces will be to control the oil fields of Libya to the sound of the anthem "God bless the queen ..." (one of the richest on the African continent), and the fight against ISIS will result in bombing "at the limit" (say = 20 bombs a day, because they they cost money, but the Anglo-Saxon will not go to extra expenses and compensate for the spent ones with Libyan oil). The Americans are doing the same in northeastern Syria.
  3. +1
    1 February 2016 10: 47
    And what's the use of waking them up there?
    1. +3
      1 February 2016 10: 56
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      And what's the use of waking them up there?

      ... no matter how, as usual ... the oil-bearing areas are beginning to take over ... this DAISH was given to them ... hi
    2. +4
      1 February 2016 10: 56
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      And what's the use of waking them up there?

      They will guard their base and drive to the toilet in tanks, as in Afghanistan.
  4. +2
    1 February 2016 10: 47
    They survived, at first they collapsed, and now they themselves do not know with whom to negotiate. To carry and carry money one or the other :)
  5. +1
    1 February 2016 10: 47
    "Strengthen" - about the same as in Afghanistan ... A garden near the base will be organized: a patch of hemp, a patch of opium poppy, and what else does NATO need to meet the advent of "democracy", which they so stubbornly sought in Libya.
  6. +1
    1 February 2016 10: 48
    The States have already "sorted out" Libya. Now let them go voluntarily. And then you will sweep the hell out with a filthy broom. And who asked whom when they staged a coup in the country? If Hussein and Gaddafi had not been removed, there would have been no IS, these "dictators" would have soaked it in the bud. We need Libya under the supervision of the Britons .. Inside the country they will carry out their dirty deeds.
  7. +1
    1 February 2016 10: 49
    A thousand? Are they sending them for a snack? Or politicians blood of their soldiers for nothing, just to be noted?
  8. -2
    1 February 2016 10: 51
    I don’t know if it’s true, but they write that Russia is no longer in BRICS !!! China and India enter the group - TICK, which includes Taiwan, India, China and South Korea.
  9. +1
    1 February 2016 11: 00
    Who, I wonder, are they "are negotiating"?

    Statehood is eliminated, Gaddafi is torn to pieces, Tuareg gangs are returning to their pristine state.
  10. +1
    1 February 2016 11: 05
    How to bomb - they didn’t ask permission, but how to stay - they ask. Paradox request ...
  11. +1
    1 February 2016 11: 10
    They are afraid that their "interests" will remain interests. VKS RF works very well. All the "chosen ones" that will remain in flight are simply horrified.
  12. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 11
    Well done in Americans: at first they made a mess in Libya, and now they want to place the British there. Go ahead.
  13. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 11
    In countries where Anglo-Saxons appear, you should definitely not expect good things.
  14. +1
    1 February 2016 11: 13
    "" "This situation creates a real danger that terrorists will mix with migrants and together with them will penetrate into Europe" ""

    This is for you Kadaffi comes around !!!
  15. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 16
    “The West is persuading” sounds very strange. It would be plausible - he commands, orders the natives to pay for the "service" from which they have no right to refuse.
  16. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 16
    let them land in Libya already like it was in Somalia. Masons will not calm down for them little that a peaceful and well-living country has been turned into a territory of permanent chaos according to their Tolmud conspiracy due to friendship with Russia. Now let the hand with the "black mark" be waiting for them on the doorstep.
  17. +1
    1 February 2016 11: 17
    When will editors learn to write article titles in Russian?
  18. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 27
    Yeah, let them introduce 1000 of their troops. Here we finish in Syria. It must be taken for Libya. Throw 10 Syrian soldiers with equipment. And the British will not do anything.
  19. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 31
    British scientists have found that British scientists prevent British scientists from studying British scientists. That's about the same way our partners act fool
  20. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 41
    The same to me, strategists, developed a plan to maintain the Libyan army of the English with the Americans. We know your plans, Vayagi crap.
    1. 0
      1 February 2016 11: 45
      Well, Haftar is still alive - because Egypt supports him. If the army falls apart and Tobruk falls, then the entire western border of Egypt will be a war zone.

      It doesn’t matter who defeats Tobruk - IS, they have already slaughtered Egypt into Villats, the Dawn of Libya also has its shadow unjustly taken from Libya to Egypt, and they do not recognize the Junta, but recognize the Muslim Brotherhood.
  21. VP
    0
    1 February 2016 11: 45
    Thousands of them will be enough only to protect themselves
  22. 0
    1 February 2016 11: 53
    Why would it suddenly need permission !? Apparently, after the US ambassador was executed in Libya ... They began to fear those whom they themselves had brought to power.
  23. 3vs
    0
    1 February 2016 12: 14
    Calling is easy, then these friends are tortured to send home!
  24. 0
    1 February 2016 12: 17
    they want by any means to legitimize their military presence in Libya.
    The military presence is nothing more than control over the "nascent" government.

    Syria taught them a lot. If you want to, you don’t want to, but acting with the sanction of a legitimate government is a powerful trump card.
    Then there will be no problems with the UN.

    They fear that soon, the plunder of Libya will stop.
    Influence leaves them
  25. +3
    1 February 2016 12: 36
    Quote: GRAY
    Chet, I did not understand - with which of the governments do they want to agree?

    The question is interesting. Which one?
    "...... The situation of Libya today is characterized by a complete lack of signs of statehood. The country plunged into an internecine war and disintegrated, part of the territory was captured by the units of the" Islamic State "(IS). In Tripoli, there are parallel authorities, which, however, also control only separate pieces of the territory of the former Libyan Jamahiriya. There are five rival "governments" in Libya now, but none of them is able to stop the general violence and establish control over the situation. Specific to the situation of Libya is the declaration of part of its territory "Islamic State." youth (shura) in Derby has already sworn allegiance to IS, whose positions are gradually strengthening "......
    The game is big. France, Anglo-Saxons (USA, England), China, Russia, Saudis, Qatar, Egypt.
    France’s goal is to transfer its expeditionary force for .... to Libya from Chad. “Military revival” of “strong power” in Libya, which is necessary to stop the flow of refugees to Europe from northern Africa and, secondly, to capture and control Libyan oil and gas fields.
    The States today play a complicated backstage party, shuffling the leaders of terrorist gangs in Tripoli and not allowing the establishment of the power of those people who would not be under their control. At the same time, the task of weakening the dependence of Libyan tribes on Saudi and Qatar, which has long irritated the United States, is being solved.
    Great Britain acted in Libya in order to disintegrate the country into several independent territories. In order to "grab" the territory rich in hydrocarbons under its control.
    The purpose of these three "allies" is to divide, not allowing China, and even more so Russia, into Libya.
    "Spiders in the Bank" - in one word!
  26. 0
    1 February 2016 12: 42
    Is there also an army? And which of the gangs will they support?
  27. 0
    1 February 2016 12: 45
    in each barrel a plug just to be shoved wherever else whereupon shit so that later they would be raked
  28. 0
    1 February 2016 12: 59
    in the need to deploy on the territory of the country 1 thousand British troops

    The main thing is to gain a foothold, and then you can build strength. Oil does not give rest to the Anglo-Saxons, they want to live curly due to the suffering of others. It is time for them (the Anglo-Saxons) to do as the British themselves did when suppressing the sepoy uprising - to attach guns to the barrel.
  29. 0
    1 February 2016 13: 36
    Ask for permission? Persuade? Funny ... Who are they trying to persuade?
  30. 0
    1 February 2016 14: 52
    Englishwoman lol crap wassat ! Scum! Geeks and others.
  31. 0
    3 February 2016 13: 42
    We decided to gain a foothold in northern Africa before the Russians arrived there ... We realized that it was too late in Syria and Iraq hi

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"