Military Review

Media: 4 newest Su-35С fighters are transferred to Syria

78
Eve portal http://scalemodels.ru/ published a series of pictures, which captured the latest Russian fighters Su-35С, allegedly making a flight from an air base in the Astrakhan region to Syria. The material uses information that four Russian fighters with tail numbers from "03" to "06" flew, following the passenger plane Tu-154M (registration number RA-85042). The blog claims that the pictures were taken from a passenger aircraft heading to Syria. Earlier (January 29) the RA-85042 board arrived at the air base in the Astrakhan region from the Chkalovsky airfield near Moscow.


Media: 4 newest Su-35С fighters are transferred to Syria


The material is supported by information from the “FlyRetar” portal page, which demonstrates the flight route of Russian aircraft. If you believe this information, then the Russian multi-role fighters, which last fall were introduced into the structure of the Russian Federation Air Force, were transferred to the Khmeymim airbase.



In November, four Su-35S planes with the indicated flight numbers carried out a flight from Komsomolsk-on-Amur, where fighters were built, to the Volga airport in Astrakhan. The 116th combat training center of the 185th center for combat training and combat use of fighter is located on the base of Volga aviation VKS of the Russian Federation.

The Su-35С aircraft use a modification of the multi-purpose E-B (electronic counter-suppression) complex of the Khibiny air-based. In the photo of the Su-35S in the sky, the containers of such a complex are clearly visible.



Information about the readiness of the use of Russian aircraft Su-35S in Syria and the newspaper leads Kommersant with reference to a source in the General Staff of the Armed Forces. The material of the newspaper states that the air group (airplanes and helicopters) of the Russian Aerospace Force of the Russian Federation in Syria already exceeds 70 units.
Photos used:
http://scalemodels.ru
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 1 February 2016 06: 25
    30
    On Su-35S aircraft, a modification of the air-based Khibiny multifunctional complex REB-P (electronic warfare suppression) is used.

    It is clear why Erdogan became orange. Soon, I suppose, it will turn green and become harder.
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 1 February 2016 06: 34
      24
      Yes, it is rather a response to Erdogan's "orange".
      It is good news that ours began to "test" weapons in Syrian conditions. Well, the strengthening of the grouping of the air base is also not superfluous, suddenly this main Turk will finally tear the roof off.
      1. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 1 February 2016 07: 00
        +6
        on the readiness of the use of Su-35S aircraft by Russia

        So to speak, a cold shower for Erdogan's "falcons".
      2. serega1512
        serega1512 1 February 2016 11: 25
        +4
        And after all, the Khibiny’s are immediately in the base)) you never know who decides to check Our Falcon for stress resistance, it’s not for them to shoot at the back of a 40-year-old bomb, this F 16 will blow it three at a time))
    2. Voha_krim
      Voha_krim 1 February 2016 07: 01
      10
      The RF Ministry of Defense did not waste time either, and in support of its forces in Syria it threw the link of the latest Su-35S fighters, capable, coupled with the S-400, to nullify all the numerical superiority of Turkish aviation. It seems to me that this is not the only precaution against the outraged Turks and Russian submarines with the democrats in the form of the “Caliber” “beloved” by the terrorists, were drawn to the conflict shores. Almost like a movie: “Do you see a submarine? No. And she is! ”
      1. Kostyar
        Kostyar 1 February 2016 07: 11
        +7
        Now the Turks snot on a fist wound specifically, all in an adult! Waving cowards as before, will not work !!!
        No NATA will help, NATA wants to live, NATA is not a fool, she has an instinct for self-preservation, at a primitive level, still works !!!
        1. Voyager
          Voyager 1 February 2016 11: 38
          +2
          And nothing that they have at least a numerical superiority at times.
      2. serega1512
        serega1512 1 February 2016 11: 27
        +2
        lol if this gimp drags on for several years, and everything goes to that, there the T-50 will be rolled around to the full!
    3. serega1512
      serega1512 1 February 2016 11: 23
      0
      laughing how it was with Hoy: "I may not be intimidating for you, but at the very point of the bench press" this F-16 bird will definitely not take it with all the desire))
  2. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 1 February 2016 06: 25
    +8
    So it is the Turks from the "disorder" that "detected" another violation of the border? And we didn't know! laughing
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 1 February 2016 06: 28
      12
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      So it is the Turks from the "disorder" that "detected" another violation of the border? And we didn't know!

      Maybe they’ll try to bring down again? am I think the second time it doesn’t work like the first plane ... It was then threatened with a finger, and now everything will be like an adult.
  3. blizart
    blizart 1 February 2016 06: 25
    -9
    ABOUT! Hot water has gone!
    The commentators of hockey matches shout so excitedly when the game takes on a particularly fierce character. Russia is doing everything so that for its population this remains a game. The farther the better.
    1. aleks700
      aleks700 1 February 2016 08: 41
      +3
      Right! The further the better.
      1. blizart
        blizart 1 February 2016 09: 30
        +3
        Quote: aleks700
        Right! The further the better.

        Well, I think so. In this regard, I do not understand the minusers, what do they want so that everything comes closer? I can praise the prudence of your government, which prefers to step up efforts on distant approaches !? For near all this, even remotely will not resemble a game.
    2. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 1 February 2016 11: 03
      0
      Quote: blizart
      Russia is doing everything so that for its population this remains a game. The farther the better.

      And what are you, Zelik, separating Russia from the people? Not good. As you say: - "will not wait."
    3. serega1512
      serega1512 1 February 2016 11: 30
      +1
      what games are there, sovereignty is at stake here!
  4. izya top
    izya top 1 February 2016 06: 26
    30
    it all fades in the background
    Ukraine will offer the United States assistance in the fight against ISIS in Syria
    haberdasher and cardinal is power
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 1 February 2016 06: 35
      +9
      Quote: iza top
      it all fades in the background
      Ukraine will offer the United States assistance in the fight against ISIS in Syria
      haberdasher and cardinal is power

      Do the Marines eat fat? In my opinion, this is the only thing that Ukraine can help the Americans, but you can’t let ukrovsk go there - a bad omen ...

      Only the Americans may not be happy with lard. I myself saw how the Austrians refused to eat roach with beer when they learned that "this fish has not been cooked" ... Savages ...
    2. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 1 February 2016 06: 36
      +1
      Quote: izya top
      haberdasher and cardinal is power

      If two morons is a force, then one of them is mass, and the second is acceleration)))
      Hu of hu decide for yourself))
    3. serega1512
      serega1512 1 February 2016 11: 32
      0
      good ohhh how exactly about the haberdashery then! Directly designed the idea in a wrapper!
  5. kitamo
    kitamo 1 February 2016 06: 27
    +5
    and why not break in new equipment for the benefit of the country?
  6. dckx
    dckx 1 February 2016 06: 28
    13
    Beautiful car, and the most important thing for pilots Good luck !!!!
    1. AlexTires
      AlexTires 1 February 2016 09: 30
      +4
      Quote: dckx
      Beautiful car, and the most important thing for pilots Good luck !!!!

      SU-35 is beautiful to impossibility !!!! Strength, power and aesthetics in one bottle! fellow
  7. Same lech
    Same lech 1 February 2016 06: 29
    +3
    On Su-35S aircraft, a modification of the air-based Khibiny multifunctional complex REB-P (electronic warfare suppression) is used.


    Maybe this is the reason for the tantrum recently in Erdogan.

    S-400 further KHIBINA what else is stocked up by the Turkish Air Force, their ability to shoot down our aircraft is reduced to zero.
    Involuntarily, ERDOGAN began to carry out banal provocations inciting a war against RUSSIA.
    1. tracker
      tracker 1 February 2016 06: 41
      +4
      How will the S-400 protect short-range air-to-air missiles? there is only a calculation for their electronic warfare and then the latest modifications
      AIM-9X - a modern modification of the rocket. A new matrix infrared seeker was installed, which forms an image of the target in the infrared range and is not sensitive to infrared traps. The resolution of the photodetector matrix is ​​128 × 128. Maneuverability improved thanks to traction vector control
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 1 February 2016 06: 44
        +3
        How will the S-400 protect short-range air-to-air missiles?


        Not from a rocket, but from a threat of attack ...
        not every TURKISH Air Force pilot decides to attack our SU-34s knowing that the S-400 is working against him.
        1. tracker
          tracker 1 February 2016 07: 40
          +1
          in Syria, yes, near the border, they will give an order, if not a sidewinder, so far
      2. Suhov
        Suhov 1 February 2016 11: 18
        0
        Quote: Pathfinder
        How will the S-400 protect short-range air-to-air missiles?

        To use an air-to-air missile, you must first take off.
        There was infa that our pilots didn’t refuse to fly in the area where the inflatable dummies of the S-300 complexes were deployed, but urgently asked that these rubber products be transferred from "combat" position wassatin the "marching".
        And in Syria, the S-400 seems to be real ... hi
      3. aleks 62 next
        aleks 62 next 1 February 2016 11: 28
        0
        ..... how does the S-400 protect short-range air-to-air missiles? ....

        .... That's just the point - short-range action .... This, if you believe the advertisement, -18 km .... And this distance still needs to get closer .... Something tells me that there will be no such distance .. ... And there will be, if necessary, "shooting" the carriers of this device (AIM-9X) from medium and long distances ... hi
  8. Oleneboy_
    Oleneboy_ 1 February 2016 06: 30
    +1
    A good addition to existing aircraft. Yes, and in combat, this is one thing, but on Le Bourget it is different. Its radars are detected at a distance of 400 km.
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 February 2016 06: 39
    +2
    I think that in a month the work for Rosvooruzhenie will increase under new contracts for Russian aviation equipment. Demand for which began to increase after the start of work of our videoconferencing.
  10. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 1 February 2016 06: 40
    11
    If a mess happens with the Turks, then these planes will be not few but very few.
    1. Minstrel
      Minstrel 1 February 2016 08: 45
      +9
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      If a mess happens with the Turks, then these planes will be not few but very few.

      It seems to me that if the real turmoil begins, then a salvo of missiles will follow, after which Erdogan will need an urgent visit to the store with new fighters. And he will have to buy new airfields urgently ... Or do you think that the Russian command will silently and inactively watch the takeoffs of Turkish "falcons" flying to shoot down Russian planes?
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 February 2016 09: 27
      +1
      It is necessary to make allowance for losses from S-300/400 air defense, a couple of volleys will follow immediately and all that is in the air will fall, then jump airfields up to 200 km from the border and radars that provide control of the situation in the region should be damaged. Turkey has about 250 F-16 different (new and not very). They do not have F-15s with long ranges, so that they cannot reach the border with Syria. But our naval group will be attacked and the Turks can start a ground invasion (with tanks and other things), the Turks also have tactical missiles, such as Points. In general, the mess will not be pleasant and will require a direct attack on the ground forces with the corresponding victims and attacks on the territory of Turkey of the Kyrgyz Republic at airfields and bases and bridges and ships, and this is another story ...
    3. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 1 February 2016 11: 33
      +1
      ..... If a mess happens with the Turks, then these planes will be not few but very few ....

      .... I think in this case the main role will be not with airplanes, but with air defense systems .... Moreover, our restored Syrian systems (albeit much outdated, but still battle-worthy), the deployment of which is not limited to the aerodrome in Latakia, but much closer to the intended area of ​​use .... lol
  11. Stinger
    Stinger 1 February 2016 06: 49
    +3
    Oil painting. "Spring. The Rooks Have Arrived." Save your pince-nez. We must, we must test the full capabilities of the machine. Yes, and it is not harmful to visually promote the products of the aircraft industry.
  12. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 1 February 2016 07: 00
    +2
    The experience of combat use, which is so necessary for our military, is necessary and necessary. Break in equipment, experience for specialists. In short, combat training.
  13. papanya59
    papanya59 1 February 2016 07: 08
    +1
    I can not express my emotions! Four powerful beauties !!!
  14. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 1 February 2016 07: 11
    +3
    What was the need to fly so close to the passenger board that you could see everything: from identification marks to attached equipment? If this is not a fake, then it is very similar to "unobtrusive" wink power demonstration: like in a dark alley, when hooligans began to surround you, pull out an ax from your bosom and start cutting your nails ....... repeat
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 February 2016 09: 40
      +1
      For a photo shoot ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 1 February 2016 10: 49
      +1
      And why not show, if there is something to show. request If, for example, the great and the ancients prosralized their aircraft, then they have nothing to show except the hopak and huts in ribbons.
      Do not be shy, and even more so afraid. They are afraid of us, and they are afraid to horror. If they were not afraid and could, then they would have rolled out our base long ago.
      So, let them take the Turks, you can even swallow ...
    4. KnightRider
      KnightRider 1 February 2016 10: 54
      +2
      Quote: S_Baykala
      What was the need to fly so close to the passenger side that you could make out everything: from identification marks to attached equipment?

      So that there are not five "points" on the radars, but one
    5. Voyager
      Voyager 1 February 2016 11: 40
      +2
      Don't you really understand? Almost all fighters were "delivered" in this way, close to the cargo planes to maintain stealth.
    6. Muvka
      Muvka 1 February 2016 13: 23
      +1
      And how much was this board passenger, if judging by the fly-radar, it belonged to the Air Force Force?
  15. dzzen
    dzzen 1 February 2016 07: 21
    +2
    The Turks now have, as they say in the Navy, to catch the wind with blue cowards.
  16. ochakow703
    ochakow703 1 February 2016 07: 31
    +1
    I wonder how well the rotation of our pilots in Syria is organized. It’s good, of course, to test and test equipment in combat conditions, but it is also important for pilots to undergo combat training.
  17. Taygerus
    Taygerus 1 February 2016 07: 47
    +1
    excellent car, good luck to our pilots!
  18. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 1 February 2016 07: 53
    -6
    to where people kill people

  19. Zomanus
    Zomanus 1 February 2016 08: 13
    0
    No, well, they first started.
    Why was it necessary to shoot down and kill our pilot?
    Now the fighters have thrown there,
    that is, planes that are geared towards killing planes.
    Apparently there was infa about the new provocation of the Turks.
    So they worked ahead of schedule,
    to prevent new victims on their and our part.
    If not for the Russian tourists down,
    who smuggle into Turkey ...
  20. SERGEY UI
    SERGEY UI 1 February 2016 08: 26
    0
    Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said that Ankara gave Moscow data proving the violation of the country's airspace by a Russian bomber the day before. He said this at a press conference in Saudi Arabia, Dogan agency reports.


    © RIA "Novosti"
    “I hope Russia will be more responsible in this matter and will tell the truth. We transmitted information about this [violation of the Turkish airspace] to Russia through military channels, ”he said.
    Here are the news request
  21. From Samara
    From Samara 1 February 2016 08: 42
    -4
    Waiting for a Massive Bang in Turkey!
  22. Ros 56
    Ros 56 1 February 2016 08: 58
    +3
    Well, one of us’s dreams came true, though I don’t remember the call sign, everyone worried that there wasn’t 35 in Syria. Now there is such a machine, on occasion we will test in a combat situation. Don’t say that no matter what tests are carried out, a real machine can only be tested in battle.
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 February 2016 09: 44
      0
      Su-30CM is not much inferior, radar characteristics and a little maneuverability. Su-35S is a signal to the Turks, what would they think before the action against our aircraft.
  23. igorka357
    igorka357 1 February 2016 09: 09
    +9
    Guys, I certainly understand everything, patriotism, and so on. etc. and I’ll immediately warn you ... I don’t give a damn about your low minuses, the Turks have only one F-16D-C, about two hundred or a little more, and you write dumb comments like, the su-35 link together with the s-400 complex will flood the Turkish Air Force , damn the site starts to look like a bunch of down-degenerators! Of course, Russia will defeat Turkey, in the event of a full-scale war, but in Syria there are no our armed forces, there is only a very small part of them !!! but very few!
    1. su163
      su163 1 February 2016 09: 22
      -4
      Gouging the runway at Turkish airfields and the question is, where did the soaring flights go?
      1. Rostovchanin
        Rostovchanin 1 February 2016 11: 32
        +1
        Gouging the runway at Turkish airfields and the question is, where did the soaring flights go?

        find where to sit, don’t worry, in such cases we have runway sections on every federal highway, in Soviet times, exercises were regularly conducted on their use, I don’t think that the Turks are dumber than us.
      2. Voyager
        Voyager 1 February 2016 11: 42
        0
        Believe me, it will be much easier for them to gouge our GDP ..
    2. From Samara
      From Samara 1 February 2016 09: 23
      0
      Among all of these F-16s, there are truly no more than half in combat strength ... And the Ground Forces are made up of outright rubbish! But air defense is so completely lacking ... And let the Turks not be seduced by the fact that in Syria we do not have troops. The blow can also be inflicted from other directions. There is Armenia, there is Iran ...
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 1 February 2016 09: 34
        +1
        And Crimea ... And Krymsk .. And Yeysk ...
        1. From Samara
          From Samara 1 February 2016 09: 37
          -1
          So I say that Turkey is taken in Pincers ....
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Markiz_A
        Markiz_A 1 February 2016 09: 47
        -6
        1. We do not have a common border with Armenia.
        2. Iran does not have a common border with Turkey.
        3. Does Armenia need this?
        4. Does Iran need this?
        1. From Samara
          From Samara 1 February 2016 09: 59
          0
          Gee ... Iran has a common border with Turkey. Before writing garbage, study a map or something? If a full-scale war with Turkey starts, then Iran and Armenia will be drawn into it. Armenians need to return their historical lands, Iran has long dreamed of a conflict with Turkey and Saudi Arabia, because because of them he suffers huge material losses ...

          Armenia is convenient for the location of our Iskanders first of all. And if anything, several motorized rifle divisions will easily pass through all of Georgia to Armenia, and Georgia will not even pick it up ...
        2. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 1 February 2016 10: 00
          0
          Armenia will not be against, and if it is, it will be too late.
        3. serega1512
          serega1512 1 February 2016 11: 50
          0
          and who will ask Armenia whether they need it or not, they’ll say we’ll go through you and bear it all! when it comes to direct war and large-scale planning of attacks by the All-Russian Federation. they will, they will confront the fact, and those that would save face will say like they themselves suggested!
      4. Pimply
        Pimply 1 February 2016 12: 23
        -2
        Quote: From Samara
        Among all of these F-16, truly no more than half are in combat ...

        Honestly what?

        Quote: From Samara
        ..And the Ground Forces are made up of overt rubbish! But air defense is so completely lacking ... And let the Turks not be seduced by the fact that in Syria we do not have troops. The blow can also be inflicted from other directions. There is Armenia, there is Iran ...

        Lord, what a naughty nonsense. The Turkish armed forces are among the most trained and equipped in the Middle East.
    3. Trigger-Happy
      Trigger-Happy 1 February 2016 09: 29
      0
      Relax, people here earn stars and positive statistics !!!
    4. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 February 2016 09: 56
      +2
      All 250pcs cannot be based on several airfields near the border (200km).
      1. The loss from the S-300/400 volley will cool the ardor.
      2. airfields will be destroyed.
    5. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 February 2016 09: 56
      0
      All 250pcs cannot be based on several airfields near the border (200km).
      1. The loss from the S-300/400 volley will cool the ardor.
      2. airfields will be destroyed.
      1. Voyager
        Voyager 1 February 2016 11: 43
        +1
        The destruction of airfields will be regarded as an attack on the country of the alliance.
    6. Ros 56
      Ros 56 1 February 2016 11: 30
      +2
      Quote: igorka357
      some F-16D-C about two hundred pieces


      How do you imagine the take-off of 200 hundreds of aircraft. Second, how many pieces out of 200 are ready to take off. This is not for you when you flew regiments and even divisions, but very rarely. It is necessary to fly to the border with Syria, and they will be spotted even when the engines warm up. And why did you decide that in the event of a mess, ours would not take any action. If we have a plan, almost counties are being moved. Well, see the comment below about airfields.
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 1 February 2016 16: 41
        0
        You judge one-sidedly, when a country wages a war of annihilation, it completely switches to military rails, and if the Russian Federation begins to slaughter Turks, then believe all 200 will take off, and Americans will throw them up! Now about the airfields, we have much less of them in Syria, and I think that ours will not begin to send ground troops if a big mess begins! Russia is still in its mind and will simply deliver a massive missile strike on the infrastructure of the Turks, of course, a nuclear-free one, and that's it, the Turks are kirdyk, but unfortunately our small group in Syria will be destroyed, even and have time to do some damage! And all this despite the fact that NATO will rub off and say .. the Turks themselves are to blame, we wash our hands, and if NATO enters the war, then there is only one alignment with us .. hollowing everyone and everything, with all kinds of weapons, including nuclear, otherwise we already kirdyk!
  24. AlexTires
    AlexTires 1 February 2016 09: 33
    +1
    The Su-35С aircraft use a modification of the multi-purpose E-B (electronic counter-suppression) complex of the Khibiny air-based. In the photo of the Su-35S in the sky, the containers of such a complex are clearly visible.

    I feel that soon the Turkish Air Force will be put on mothballing! Still, the T-50 would be there for real tests, because Alager is an alager.
    IMHO, soon a queue should be built for these control systems - there will not be enough plants, for a very promising model for export. Apparently, there is an urgent need to create new aircraft building capacities, only at Beria’s, and not at Chubais’s pace.
    Good luck guys !!!
    1. Markiz_A
      Markiz_A 1 February 2016 09: 57
      -3
      Judging by our gallant statements, our Sushki and MiGs almost defeat Rafali, Eurofighter, F-15, etc. almost all dry. However, oddly enough, India decided to buy Rafali, at a price 3 times higher than our MiG-35 and 2 times higher than the Su-30MKI. And if we take into account that Rafal belongs to the light class of fighters, surprise increases even more. Egypt, for some reason, decided to buy Rafali.
      For example, would you buy a Peugeot 207 at a price 3 times higher than an Audi A-6 ???
      Maybe not everything is as good as shown in our advertising?
      By the way, the same applies to submarines and helicopters and self-propelled guns and transporters.
      1. From Samara
        From Samara 1 February 2016 10: 16
        +1
        Plant Arabs and Hindus at least on the most perfect car, one of them is useless pilots ...
      2. atlantida04
        atlantida04 1 February 2016 12: 43
        0
        Nobody canceled the pressure of the United States, and everyone also saw sanctions against Iran, when all accounts were blocked. And where are the savings from the rich people of India and Egypt?
        And from this we can conclude that the United States is the real terrorists.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Muvka
        Muvka 1 February 2016 13: 29
        +1
        And you are not aware of the fact that, in addition to this, India has ordered another 2020 Su-50MKIs and a production license for about a hundred more by 30?
  25. viktortech
    viktortech 1 February 2016 09: 37
    +4
    Guys, seriously, what a chatter. We have 4 planes flew there, but the talk is as if there are natives with sticks sitting there in Africa. I completely agree with Igorka357, one should not think that fools and incompetent people are sitting everywhere, and our Russian Vanya will win everyone with a sapper blade. Turkey is a serious enemy, and even more so in an alliance with NATO, and their equipment is no worse than ours, no matter how much the media voices about the total superiority of our equipment, this is not always and far from the case. Make no mistake the Amers, they think they are an "exceptional nation" and their technique is invincible.
    1. From Samara
      From Samara 1 February 2016 09: 43
      +1
      Ogh ... One rubbish is collected in Turkey, there even our old BTR-60s bought in the German Democratic Republic at their forefront ... And some of the more or less literate generals are either in prison or fled abroad ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 February 2016 09: 54
        +1
        But don’t worry - if allies of Turkey put up new weapons as soon as possible, the rubbish is not rubbish, but it can shoot.
        1. From Samara
          From Samara 1 February 2016 10: 01
          0
          Yes, I don’t worry. I know the mentality of the Turks, it is difficult to train them in the possession of modern technology ... in fact, these are our Uzbeks ...
          1. cherkas.oe
            cherkas.oe 1 February 2016 11: 46
            +1
            Quote: From Samara
            .. essentially these are our Uzbeks ...

            But building is not bad, not like Uzbeks. lol
    2. Ros 56
      Ros 56 1 February 2016 14: 57
      0
      Quote: viktortech
      and in alliance with NATO


      It's you about NATO, which their women can’t protect, don’t tell p ... u, it is already ridiculous. Their Arabs with blacks hollow with their bare hands. So they climbed to fight for the Turks, yeah, right now, there are half of the blue ones.
  26. BOB044
    BOB044 1 February 2016 09: 44
    +1
    New weapons must pass combat tests. Here on the enemies of Syria and check, if necessary, we will bring something to mind.
  27. sinoptic
    sinoptic 1 February 2016 10: 38
    -1
    If a serious mess begins, all of our group in Latakia will not survive - it is clear to everyone. So she is not there to fight with the Turks. BUT ... the Turks will still not be able to put significant forces on Latakia.
    Do not forget - if the mess begins, we already have more or less normal troops there on the other side of the Black Sea.
    They will be involved. Aviation, fleet.
    I think, at a minimum, all the Turkish airbases (they can be counted there on the fingers) and, possibly, naval bases there will immediately be smashed.

    And if it is completely tight, I suspect that even in Latakia, nuclear weapons will probably be involved, I don’t think ours will allow the Turks to just take Latakia and mock our soldiers. Putin, in this regard, is fine.
    I think 1-2 nuclear attacks (maybe even just demonstration, in the empty sea) and Turkey will sit at the negotiating table on our terms.

    If Erdogan does not understand this situation, then he is simply a patient on his head.
    But I think he understands everything and just bluffs, like: "Look how cool I am", "Look how cool Turkey is." And all because as soon as it comes down to it - all Turks will crap at once. They already showed it when they shot down our plane. This is normal - this is such a psychology in the East, they can only be cowardly and out of tishka.
  28. triglav
    triglav 1 February 2016 10: 53
    +2
    The Turks will be fucked up, that's for sure And after them the Americans. If the Turks appear on ours, the Americans will no longer cover them: dumb. So, the State Department will waddle again ... But it was even worth paying attention to this. This is now a field of activity for our media. Not the yellow stinker and the fifth column, but the popular ones. And first of all - RT. And new equipment must be tested in combat conditions. And we ourselves will understand whether the designers have done a good job, and foreign "partners" will subside.
  29. KnightRider
    KnightRider 1 February 2016 11: 15
    +1
    The first combat missions are coming soon! But before that, briefing, training and flight training ... I think, before being sent to Syria, these aircraft and their crews underwent a very serious combat training and preparatory work, it was not for nothing that they were sent first to the airfield of the 116th USBP, where they were for the first time pictures of "drying" systems with electronic warfare systems "Khibiny-M". Maybe we'll see something else interesting, for example, new air-to-air missiles? soldier
  30. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 1 February 2016 11: 17
    +4
    Lord! Curb the warlike ardor, my fellow commentators! Well, how everyone wants to fight and everyone imagines himself, well, at least Napoleon. First of all: 1.- Nuclear weapons about deterrent weapons will be used only as a last resort, but I hope that it will not come to that. 2-Our VKS in Syria is not to start a war with Turkey or anyone else. 3-. Russia has repeatedly stated that it is not planning ground operations in Syria (I am not talking about the work of individual special forces groups). 4.-35s are now widely advertised, so they decided to "test" them in Syria, in order to once again show "partners" and potential buyers that this is really a new aircraft with an immense range of combat capabilities. 5.-I advise the "generals" who have already taken the Turks in the ring, always remember that our Black Sea coast, especially the Caucasian direction, along the supply line, is very vulnerable. 6.- And finally, I think that the General Staff has long worked through all the real situations in plan "and eat a fish and ... do not sit down."
  31. Vladimir M.V.
    Vladimir M.V. 1 February 2016 11: 18
    +3
    http://chervonec-001.livejournal.com/1125518.html
  32. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 1 February 2016 11: 25
    +1
    We did everything right, it is better to play it safe than to bury someone again. If I had my way, I would have pinned Iskander M there as a factor of final containment.
  33. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 1 February 2016 13: 14
    0
    "Khibiny" - it is, of course, good and blah arodno (c), but the main question remains - what will happen on the AKU-170? Can we finally see something newer than the R-27 on the suspensions of combat machines? smile
  34. Svetlana
    Svetlana 1 February 2016 23: 31
    0
    Just as the vertical black and yellow stripes of a tiger mask it when moving on the ground against the background of yellow fallen leaves, the vertical blue and white stripes on the airplane body mask it when moving in the blue sky against the background of white clouds, reduce the likelihood of its detection in the optical range . Is it possible to apply such a disguise on the SU-35S? See http: //topwar.ru/90089-v-vvs-turcii-obyavlen-vysshiy-uroven-trevogi.html