A VTsIOM poll showed that the number of Russians who perceive Yeltsin’s political figure negatively increased significantly.

392
A regular survey of public opinion in Russia in relation to the so-called Yeltsin era, conducted by experts VTsIOM, showed that the number of Russians, evaluating Yeltsin (as a politician) negatively, has increased significantly in recent years. The number of Russians who blamed the 90's crisis for Yeltsin and his entourage increased from 36% in 2006 to 50% in 2016.

A VTsIOM poll showed that the number of Russians who perceive Yeltsin’s political figure negatively increased significantly.


To name any positive achievement of Yeltsin at the presidential post was difficult for 52% of respondents. In 2007, this figure was 28%. At the same time, 90% of respondents could easily recall the negative sides of the Yeltsin team that ruled the country from 1991 to 2000.

Those who remembered the achievements of Yeltsin most often called this: the revival of private property in the country, the emergence of so-called democratic freedoms, overcoming the acute food crisis that swept the country in the late Soviet and early post-Soviet period.

The main negative elements of the Yeltsin era, the Russians surveyed consider the Chechen campaign, the default of 1998, the plundering of state property under the guise of privatization, mass unemployment, non-payment of wages and social benefits. 55% of Russians surveyed believe that Yeltsin is one of the perpetrators of the collapse of the USSR. In 2007, this figure was 48%.

The survey was conducted among 1600 people in 130 locations of the Russian Federation. The stated error is not more than 3,5%.
392 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +103
    29 January 2016 17: 32
    And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
    Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power ....
    1. +106
      29 January 2016 17: 35
      Quote: wandlitz
      And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....

      And here the question arises. And what for did they vote for? I have never abandoned the bulletin for this alkanaut, I asked the others and heard pathetic answers like: "We vote not for Yeltsin, but for reforms." The reformers are bad ...
      1. +44
        29 January 2016 17: 39
        Interestingly, "VTsIOM" (VChK) took "on the pencil" those who are still for EBNa! laughing
        Surely the very reform liberals! To the wall would have them.
        And it would be like in the good old days - "Unanimously!"
        1. +69
          29 January 2016 17: 46
          http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/726/sube159.png
          1. +4
            29 January 2016 20: 07
            Sorry sweetheart. My hands are short. This is not 10, this is 100 + to you.
            1. +47
              29 January 2016 20: 17
              That’s such a president was in Russia .. I think such videos should be like a presentation at the Yeltsin Museum
              1. +2
                29 January 2016 20: 50
                No, this is an unambiguous pi ... pi.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +28
                  30 January 2016 00: 58
                  wandlitz
                  And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
                  Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power (EBN) ....

                  Some people in Soviet times, before M. Gorbachev, lived in the USSR and did not know grief, therefore they were little interested in politics, and some understood it very peculiarly.
                  For example, I’ll never forget how my neighbor on the landing, who worked as a cook in the dining room, in the restaurant, before choosing EBN, spoke in conversation with the women on the bench (I just walked by), for what reason she voted for him and ALWAYS (!) Will vote. At the same time, women could not convince her so.
                  You only, dear forum users, from such a rare statement do not fall from chairs and sofas!
                  She said:
                  - Here is Yeltsin’s hair - oh, beautiful! I will vote for him alone! And then the rulers are already tired - all bald and bald! And Yeltsin - oh, with hair! Not that Bear - “tagged” - bald! ”
                  True, she was from the village, and that, EBN drinks, she was not particularly embarrassed.
                  Many men in those days were far from her, too, they said, for example:
                  - So what? You think! What is there? We lived under communism - and now we live under capitalism! For a change. And then, look, in the West how well people live! Are we worse?
                  To develop envy among Soviet people was one of the tasks of the CIA’s propaganda in the USSR to destroy the entire socialist camp in general, and the USSR / Russia in the first place.
                  1. +28
                    30 January 2016 01: 02
                    Both Yeltsin and Gorbachev - in fact, two boots of a pair!
                    1. -19
                      30 January 2016 01: 06
                      Will we leave GDP out of scope?
                      1. -17
                        30 January 2016 01: 17
                        Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                        Will we leave GDP out of scope?

                        On the tatami go barefoot. laughing
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                    3. +2
                      30 January 2016 05: 52
                      And it was necessary to nail them on time .... to the floor!
                    4. -5
                      30 January 2016 09: 31
                      ... two "Spanish boots" for Russia ..
                      1. +3
                        31 January 2016 06: 16
                        Both Yeltsin and Gorbachev - in fact, two boots of a pair!

                        ... so I actually had them in mind and why you minus is not clear ... although of course you are so slow to catch up to me for "x" times ...

                        pysy: interesting just what you thought? what
                    5. +6
                      30 January 2016 11: 45
                      Quote: Tatiana
                      two boots

                      of different sizes: one had the goal of destroying the USSR at the direction of the United States, and the other destroyed the USSR in order to remove Humpback from the gang and take its place. There was a section of influence in the bandit group.
                  2. +25
                    30 January 2016 12: 20
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    and that, EBN drinks, she was not particularly embarrassed.

                    This drunk country was drinking in the literal sense ...
                    An old, sickly senile, crushed from power and honors, illegally seizing upon the supreme rule with his nidi-hangers, sawing and selling a great power ...
                    At the end of his drunken reign, he did not decide anything ... Hypocritical slabbers, rotten brooding camarilla determined the fate of the motherland, where their main determining criterion is their money, profit ... And until now, this compradorous evil spells out its conditions, rules and laws. Reformers h.renova ...
                    Every fall opens billion-dollar centers, erects monuments, and the GDP declares about "significant" achievements and "great deeds" of modern "heroes" of the nation ...
                    Light the Borusik, your business lives on!
                    1. +1
                      1 February 2016 15: 24
                      I am ashamed and shameful! Woof ... oh woof .... but! The president of a great country, like a clown! Ready to tear, like a heating pad!
                  3. -2
                    31 January 2016 09: 38
                    To develop envy among Soviet people was one of the tasks of the CIA’s propaganda in the USSR to destroy the entire socialist camp in general, and the USSR / Russia in the first place.

                    The collapse of the USSR is, first of all, the "work" of the KGB officers, who wanted to openly ransack and live on a grand scale. And no CIA could do this with its propaganda. How long have tried. And the internal tycoons were leading the USSR just in time to collapse.
                    I have enough evidence for myself. And the most irrefutable - this is an reconnaissance vessel, standing exactly on the same day, at the channel in the Nikolaev region of the Dnieper-Bug estuary. Everything would be fine, but in order to get there he had to leave Sevastopol, walk a lot of miles, so that by morning he should already be in the right place (strategic district). Question: who could organize this? Who could give such orders, give such orders and put all this into effect? In advance !! The CIA? Yeah .. Coincidence? yes no!
                    A blocked Gorbachev .. what could he already do ?! Could of course be killed as Kennedy, but for the USSR at that time it would be too much. Therefore, they did as they did. And GDP is a project that continued the cause of collapse. Not all gold seems gold.
                3. +3
                  30 January 2016 01: 22
                  Quote: Mavrikiy
                  No, this is an unambiguous pi ... pi.

                  The descendants of the action appreciated - here the market is zero.
              2. +8
                29 January 2016 21: 05
                Quote: shooter18
                That’s such a president was in Russia .. I think such videos should be like a presentation at the Yeltsin Museum

                circus




                "bring me some rub with alcohol and come back more often"


                cannot be brought to ... fool
                and once annealed
                1. +9
                  29 January 2016 22: 50
                  and who has a video of how an elkind pisses on an airplane wheel in the states? I can’t find anywhere.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                2. Mih
                  +21
                  29 January 2016 23: 01
                  Well, Brezhnev was so much like a funny grandfather! He was even very good. Boys, girls - how good! Even asked for alcohol to wipe the optical axes. Yeltsin, with his rural manners, was just a gopnik.
                  1. +10
                    29 January 2016 23: 27
                    I agree. If Brezhnev: "I smear a sandwich with caviar, and thinking - and how the people" ?, then Yolkin Korzhakov was already preparing a bottle of vodka diluted with water since nightfall. Operation "sunset". He rolled up the plugs with a machine. am
                    1. +10
                      30 January 2016 00: 35
                      So that's who first started to badyazh vodka. And you are all "counterfeit, counterfeit".
                  2. +23
                    30 January 2016 03: 04
                    Quote: Mih
                    Well, Brezhnev was so much like a funny grandfather!

                    What am I talking about?
                    But all is well in measure.
                    I think the "EBN era" humiliated us, in their own eyes, and in their eyes.
                    And it will hiccup for a long time.
                    What nah "Yeltsin memorial" ....
                    1. +6
                      30 January 2016 09: 48
                      ... what about the memorial? With the same success, liberfashiks will soon open a memorial to Hitler with spomp, speeches and an orchestra ... fumble !!! negative ... although ukropiteki will most likely surpass everyone with their "heroes" like Bandera and other scum ... fool
                      1. +10
                        30 January 2016 12: 57
                        Quote: 2C5
                        With the same success, liberfashiks will soon open a memorial to Hitler with spomp, speeches and an orchestra ...

                        Here I do not agree with you.
                        There is a fundamental DIFFERENCE m / y Adolf and EBN:
                        -GVP of Germany from 1933 to 1939 doubled. In this case, we are talking about purely inflation-free growth. The rise of the Third Reich economy (and the associated increase in living standards) shocked every economist at the Chicago School, and all other economists as well. Only from 1936 to 1939 the total industrial production of the Third Reich grew by 37%.(The drop in industrial production to Adolf in Germany from 1929 to 1932 was 40,6%.)

                        German GDP from 1933 to 1939 (seven years) has grown approximately in 2,2 times, GDP of the Soviet Union from 1928 to 1940 (13 years) increased almost 6 times.- of course, the reference point = absolute figure is important, but the achievements of the USSR are also impressive



                        2. On average, natural population growth in 1934-1939. in Germany increased by 41%.
                        1922 - 61,9 million people
                        1930 - 65,1 million people
                        1933 - 66 million people
                        1939 - 69,5 million people (within the borders of 1937)

                        3. Roads, expansion of territories, unemployment, etc.
                        in 1933, unemployment amounted to 6 million, then already in 1934 this figure decreased to 3,3 million, in 1935 - to 2,9 million, by 1939 - 302 thousand

                        -------------------------------------------
                        No, Hitler is terrible, his ideology too, he led Germany to collapse ..
                        but compare it with EBN?
                    2. +9
                      30 January 2016 17: 54
                      They themselves humiliated themselves by raising this nits to Olympus ...
                      "The people are worthy of their leaders" or another option: "we did not expect that this would turn out" ... "he did not justify the trust of the people" ... "we did not choose him" and so on ... Now this ghoul is being sculpted and again: "This is not us ... It is they, without asking" ... An eternal story ... bully bully bully
                    3. +11
                      30 January 2016 22: 54
                      What nah "Yeltsin memorial" ............................................ .......................
                      ............................ I fully support you such a memorial even build memorials!
                  3. +2
                    30 January 2016 11: 28
                    YES ALL THEY ARE FUNNY GRANDFATES. Only now I, who was born in 73 to the fullness of their foolishness, grabbed it, we all went to the bottom.
              3. Mih
                +15
                29 January 2016 22: 48
                Descendants confidently appreciated this disgrace.
                1. 0
                  31 January 2016 07: 18
                  [img] http://dg55.mycdn.me/image?t=3&bid=812452157342&id=812452157342&plc=WEB&tkn
                  = * Qyr2P83XmxVTBP_uIr9x4DSvxpE [/ img]
                  ... something like that what
              4. +21
                30 January 2016 00: 13
                wino and pest
                1. 0
                  31 January 2016 23: 59
                  Brevity is a sign of talent.
                  Directly typed. sad
              5. +13
                30 January 2016 05: 48
                Yes, bln. Already appreciated! Such a center was shaved off to this moron! Lenin never dreamed of this in his modest mausoleum! The whole world laughed, but we didn’t even know what time it was! And after all, no one knew that such a center was wiped off when the country goes in full swing and pensioners stretch every ruble for several days!
                1. +5
                  30 January 2016 14: 58
                  The rulers will change and the center will be covered, it is a pity that the money has just gone into the sand.
        2. +16
          29 January 2016 17: 47
          the emergence of so-called democratic freedoms
          It was a very specific manifestation of "freedom"
          1. +36
            29 January 2016 19: 54
            Under El Cynicism, you had to hold a rag during a TV news show - but the screen was always clean
            And to hell with this erysipelas in the top of the article? am
            There is also an "anti-museum" in Yekaterinburg, it has more interesting things than
            "Borka Center".
            1. +4
              29 January 2016 20: 56
              Quote: Very old
              Under El Cynicism, you had to hold a rag during a TV news show - but the screen was always clean

              And sometimes put a basin under the TV. tongue
            2. +4
              29 January 2016 21: 12
              Well, maybe there are still passions in Yekaterinburg and are simmering for the founding father. And the hinterland has long been sending. Yes, we won't reach Bori, but show us the polling centers, these lovely "people". Closer ... "even closer Banderlog"
          2. +7
            29 January 2016 20: 55
            Quote: bort4145
            It was a very specific manifestation of "freedom"

            If you read it correctly, "crappy", then everything falls into place!
          3. +3
            29 January 2016 20: 58
            Again wrong. What they ordered, they got it, or the memory is bad, so why blame the mirror? Specificity, oh lying, just a fee. Go and pay, otherwise ...
        3. +21
          29 January 2016 17: 47
          Quote: Baikonur
          Interestingly, "VTsIOM" (VChK) took "on the pencil" those who are still for EBNa!

          This is a secret behind seven locks hidden in the recently opened "EBN Memorial" ...
          Quote: Baikonur
          Certainly the very reform liberals!

          The most reformed for the "marked" .., all their progress towards the trough began with his persistent Forosov silence ..
          1. 0
            30 January 2016 09: 52
            ... well, there is such a version that EBN was appointed by local financial ghouls for their grandmothers, otherwise Zu would sit in a chair, and they have a mutual allergy with him ..
        4. +5
          29 January 2016 17: 58
          here on the forum there are characters who whine against Volodya, but more than once wrote that they voted for Yelitsin several times

          These are the pies
          1. +13
            29 January 2016 19: 50
            against Volodya, but more than once they wrote that they voted for Yelitsin
            Volodya is also for Yeltsin.
            1. +6
              29 January 2016 20: 58
              Quote: Gardamir
              Volodya is also for Yeltsin.

              You perceive the situation incorrectly. Not for Yeltsin but at the expense of Yeltsin!
            2. 0
              29 January 2016 20: 59
              Quote: Gardamir
              Volodya is also for Yeltsin.

              You misunderstand the situation. Not "for Yeltsin" but "at the expense of Yeltsin"!
          2. +21
            29 January 2016 22: 52
            here on the forum there are characters who whine against Volodya,


            "whine against someone" and "lick someone's ass" leave it to yourself. Here people express their attitude towards someone. Sometimes with strong arguments. Including to "Volodya". By the way, “Volodya” was fed, promoted and pushed to personify their power by the same people, for whom “Borya” was first a ram and then a screen.
            Yes, they learned to choose furniture. The current screen is polished, dust is blown away, it is not allowed to scratch and put out under the most advantageous angle. lol
            1. -9
              30 January 2016 02: 23
              Do you really think that you understand conspiracy theology, history and geopolitics? when I see such stars like you, I’m either angry (because you can’t be so stupid in the world like that) or rzhach breaks, because bodies with intelligence ashtrays talk about matters about which they don’t know anything at all.
              Pu is therefore similar to Stalin, because under the guise of a pro-Western a patriot crawled through, moreover I can say that both Stalin and Putin are NADNational forces, and Putin is more adequate.
              PS Hope you at least do not consider Major Isaev a fascist, otherwise he was zigging and saying "Heil Hitler".
              1. Boos
                +9
                30 January 2016 14: 07
                Stalin served the people, he thought and worked all the time when he was awake or engaged in self-education, especially about the war periods, he did not give rest to himself or to like-minded people. And we all see the "work" of Putin's associates. He didn't even have a clear program and probably won't. And unlike Putin, Stalin anticipated the coming challenges and prepared the Motherland for them in advance.
                1. +4
                  30 January 2016 19: 38
                  Stalin served the people, he thought and worked all the time when he was awake or engaged in self-education, especially about the war periods, he did not give rest to himself or to like-minded people. And we all see the "work" of Putin's associates. He didn't even have a clear program and probably won't. And unlike Putin, Stalin anticipated the coming challenges and prepared the Motherland for them in advance.

                  Stalin prepared in advance, and Putin even couldn’t prepare for what happened once, the Maidan in Ukraine was apparently repeated for the stupid. The same mantras about the crisis, we are waiting for the oil to rise, and endless discussions about whether we have passed the bottom of the crisis.
            2. Boos
              +2
              30 January 2016 14: 00
              Guarantor screen, prime lightning rod ... Logically.
            3. +3
              30 January 2016 14: 25
              Quote: dauria
              dauria (

              Excellent koment, everything is in the business. Thank you hi
        5. +32
          29 January 2016 18: 05
          Well, actually, in addition to frostbitten liberals like Ryzhkov, Kasyanov etc., the rest only spit at the mere mention of the surname Yeltsin, so while I read the article, I spat, thank God that the devils in hell are fried in a pan.
          1. +12
            29 January 2016 18: 32
            Quote: vlad66
            praise God that the devils in hell are fried in a pan in Judah.


            First, the word "God" must be capitalized.
            Secondly, Yeltsin just now dreams of frying pans - the worst is intended for traitors - ice circle of hell!
            1. +9
              29 January 2016 20: 37
              Quote: Weyland

              First, the word "God" must be capitalized.


              This is from a hangover with a capital? Competently write only with a small letter. First, formalism. In 1956, the rules for the use of lowercase and capital letters were adopted. According to these rules, the word God should be written only with a lowercase letter. Since then, no law amending this provision has been adopted. Many commissions worked, projects were submitted, but the law was not adopted. Consequently, the old rules remain valid.
              1. +3
                29 January 2016 20: 41
                Quote: ASK505
                This is from a hangover with a capital?

                + 1000

                One guy here also tried to prove to me that - almost literally - "You, as an appeal to the singular, are written with a capital letter" ..

                Uh, yoyo .. here is literateff divorced .. belay
                1. +4
                  29 January 2016 21: 15
                  This is exactly what is accepted in correspondence, as a respectful treatment is emphasized.
                  1. +4
                    29 January 2016 21: 37
                    Quote: Pereira
                    That is how correspondence and accepted How emphatically respectful treatment

                    He answered thickly, tired of emphasizing wink

                    - in correspondence - forgot "business" or "personal". The site is not one sideways here ..
                    - emphatically respectful attitude - and if I do not want emphasize is that respectful respect? Or, it’s scary to say, the attitude ... not entirely respectful?
                    - in any case - no one is obliged to write "you" with a capital letter when referring to a specific individual ..

                    Namely, they tried to prove ento to me. It didn’t work out, I’m like a Russian, I know a little bit like a thread laughing
                    1. +3
                      29 January 2016 22: 28
                      Actually, no one is forcing you to do this. Write as you like, if polite appeal to the interlocutor is prete or is caused by religious prohibitions. I can offer an emphatically disrespectful form of "YOU" for YOUR enemies. They will read this and be offended.
                      And to prove an empty matter. What for? They tried to explain, YOU did not perceive, YOUR will.
                      1. +3
                        30 January 2016 08: 48
                        Quote: Pereira
                        YOUR WILL

                        Damn .. I'm talking about the rules of the Russian language, and you - about the "concepts" of some request

                        Quote: Pereira
                        Actually, no one is forcing you to do this.

                        Well, I’m talking about ..

                        Okay, I understand you .. If the capital letter in the pronoun is important to you there - let it be for you .. I specifically argue with you .. yes there’s just nothing hi
                    2. +5
                      29 January 2016 22: 35
                      Using "you", no matter with a capital or small letter, is already an emphasis on respect. Therefore, if you do not want to emphasize respect for someone, avoid the pronoun "you" at all.
                      1. +5
                        30 January 2016 06: 08
                        I’ll clarify. A respectful appeal for a very long time is an appeal to you. A capital letter is needed to distinguish a personal respectful appeal to the interlocutor from the usual appeal to a group of interlocutors. A capital letter brings clarity. The absence of a capital letter means that the appeal is addressed to several people, especially if, for example, in correspondence with one person, he and his like-minded people who are not currently participating in the conversation are meant.
                        In short, in addition to politeness, it is also the requirement of common sense.
                      2. -6
                        30 January 2016 08: 49
                        Quote: Pereira
                        The absence of a capital letter means that the address is addressed to several people

                        Nonsense..

                        Quote: Pereira
                        especially if, for example, in correspondence with one person, he and his like-minded people who are not currently participating in the conversation are meant

                        They dragged an example by the ears, it wasn’t about that, as it were ..
                      3. +1
                        30 January 2016 09: 30
                        Some wildness. Indeed, there is nothing to talk about with you. Goodbye, dear.
                      4. 0
                        30 January 2016 13: 02
                        Quote: Pereira
                        Some wildness. Indeed, there is nothing to talk about with you. Goodbye, dear.

                        Baby .. sleep well ..

                        * NM * (Nothing More) - even from FIDO, if you remember this wink
                2. -1
                  30 January 2016 13: 22
                  Quote: GRAY
                  No wonder in Christianity it is believed that a repentant sinner is more valuable than a righteous one.

                  Surprisingly in Yeltsin all our shortcomings, erected in a cube, were brightly highlighted. But he did not want the evil of Russia. I wanted the best, of course, but it turned out as always. Power-hungry, not sufficiently educated, that is, from Stenka Razin. Well, that was smart enough to find Putin. But it could have been much worse. Judah and the traitor is Gorbachev. Gorbachev would ruin Russia.
                3. 0
                  30 January 2016 15: 20
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  This is from a hangover with a capital? Only write with a capital letter

                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  One guy here also tried to prove to me that - almost literally - "You, as an appeal to the singular, are written with a capital letter" ..

                  All the same, Dal authority or not?

                  and Lopatin V.V., Nechaeva I.V., Cheltsova L.K.

                  And the prayers of the Orthodox Church?
              2. +1
                30 January 2016 11: 59
                Quote: ASK505
                Competently write only with a small letter.

                Then, with all your grammar, you will find yourself next to Yeltsin. Devil's glorious, devil's, devil's.
              3. -1
                30 January 2016 22: 47
                Quote: ASK505
                In 1956, the rules for the use of lowercase and capital letters were adopted. According to these rules, the word God should be written only with a lowercase letter.


                Do not tell my slippers! What do I care about the rules adopted by the bald maize - the worst enemy of Christianity? So for 43 years, the devils have clearly explained the whole destructiveness of his delusions!
            2. +6
              29 January 2016 21: 10
              God is not a name, this is a position. Each of the gods has its own name. For example, the Muslim god is called Allah, the Jewish god is Jehovah, and one of the Indian gods is Ganesh (my favorite).
              Hell can also be different. Ice and flame are out of date. Surely the devils have long been using human inventions - electricity, infrasound, advertising, Kirkorov.
              1. +1
                30 January 2016 12: 08
                God is not a name or an office, which is why the Jews did not use the name of God. When you write "gods", this is correct, since God is one, and everything in the plural is idols.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. 0
                30 January 2016 22: 52
                Quote: Pereira
                the Muslim god is Allah


                Ha ha ha three times! There are no articles in Russian, it is easier to compare with English: Arabic al- resp. English the
                ilah - a god (any deity)
                Allah (al-ilah) - The God (specifically, the One).
                In Russian, the difference is determined on the letter exactly capital or lowercase:
                god Apollo - and God Jesus Christ
              4. 0
                30 January 2016 23: 03
                Quote: Pereira
                Surely the devils have long been using human inventions - electricity, infrasound, advertising, Kirkorov.


                Prior to the Last Judgment, only souls live in hell, without bodies - therefore the ice and fire there are still somewhat virtual, and electricity and infrasound simply do not rule! smile
              5. 0
                30 January 2016 23: 03
                Quote: Pereira
                Surely the devils have long been using human inventions - electricity, infrasound, advertising, Kirkorov.


                Prior to the Last Judgment, only souls live in hell, without bodies - therefore the ice and fire there are still somewhat virtual, and electricity and infrasound simply do not rule! smile
            3. +1
              30 January 2016 01: 10
              So maybe right during the life of Gorby in Antarctica at a boarding house? With a full and lifetime guesthouse ...
            4. 0
              30 January 2016 01: 10
              So maybe right during the life of Gorby in Antarctica at a boarding house? With a full and lifetime guesthouse ...
            5. +1
              30 January 2016 11: 54
              Grounded soap, not there, where will you pour pans from? From hydrogen, ozone or ...?
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +6
            29 January 2016 20: 30
            Well, actually, in addition to frostbitten liberals like Ryzhkov, Kasyanov etc., the rest only spit at the mere mention of the surname Yeltsin, so while I read the article, I spat, thank God that the devils in hell are fried in a pan.

            Yeltsin’s GDP itself loves more than any liberalist, here is one of his statements:


            Russia will develop and grow stronger, as the first president of the country Boris Yeltsin wanted. This was announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin in Yekaterinburg at the opening of the Presidential Center of Boris Yeltsin.
            "I remember the words of Boris Nikolayevich, which the whole country knows now:" Take care of Russia! "- said Vladimir Putin. - Boris Nikolayevich wanted our country to become strong, prosperous, happy. Much has already been done to achieve these goals, many difficulties have been overcome. We will definitely solve all the tasks facing us. Russia will grow stronger, develop, through the efforts and work, the talent of our people, their devotion to their Motherland. "
            The colossal challenges, difficulties, contradictions of that time were fully reflected in the personality and fate of Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin believes. "He possessed a strong-willed, direct, courageous character, the ability to show utmost decisiveness. And largely thanks to these qualities, our country did not turn from the chosen democratic path of development,"
            1. +2
              29 January 2016 21: 02
              Quote: assam4
              Yeltsin’s GDP itself loves more than any liberalist, here is one of his statements:

              Learn to see and place accents correctly. Primarily "the first president", and EBN for the second time!
              1. 0
                30 January 2016 09: 25
                Note that "as the first president of the country, Boris Yeltsin, wanted," said not Putin, but a journalist. So the emphasis on the "first president" to make "Boris Yeltsin" secondary was made by the journalist. It is necessary not only to "see the accents", but also to understand who makes them.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StXbB47aRdw
                (4m 50s)
            2. -4
              29 January 2016 21: 59
              Quote: assam4
              Boris Nikolaevich wanted our country to become strong, prosperous, happy.

              And why did you get that he did not want this? It is true to want and do these different things ...
              But he did something good (you know).
              You can draw an analogy with a man who robbed and killed all his life, and in the end he thought about what he would leave behind and decided to do a good deed.
              Undoubtedly, this does not negate the fact that he is a villain in life, but a good deed will not go anywhere either.
              No wonder in Christianity it is believed that a repentant sinner is more valuable than a righteous one.
              1. +3
                29 January 2016 22: 50
                It’s a pity to land, everything is the other way around. At first he did a good deed, but he was put on the presidency and he became a great sinner. The poor fellow sits somewhere in a tar pot, is boiled in bitumen, after all, from the builders.
                1. +3
                  29 January 2016 23: 17
                  Quote: varov14
                  At first he did a good deed,

                  I don’t remember good deeds for him "in the beginning", he went to criticize Gorbachev, that's all.
                  And he did not pull to the presidency (Count Monte Cristo did not work out of him).
              2. +3
                29 January 2016 23: 04
                "But he did some good things (you know)."
                We do not know.
                1. -2
                  29 January 2016 23: 19
                  Quote: Villon
                  "But he did some good things (you know)."

                  He brought Putin to power, at least I think so.
                  1. +3
                    29 January 2016 23: 53
                    Are you sure that he brought Putin to power? And then, is Putin an absolute good? Under his presidency, there were elements of good and elements of bad. It is necessary to compare, but there is not enough information for this. And to give an assessment, especially a final one, is not yet possible.
                    1. +1
                      30 January 2016 00: 26
                      Quote: Villon
                      Are you sure that he brought Putin to power?

                      Not sure, but I do not exclude it.
                      Quote: Villon
                      absolute good

                      This does not happen in nature, however, as well as absolute evil.
                      1. +2
                        30 January 2016 00: 43
                        But everything went smoothly painfully, some characters did not even realize how beautifully they threw them. Do you recognize the deceased? What did he say then and what did he broadcast later, hehe.
                      2. +1
                        30 January 2016 12: 35
                        Quote: GRAY
                        Quote: Villon
                        absolute good

                        This does not happen in nature, however, as well as absolute evil.

                        In nature, it may not happen, but in politics it happens often. Think of Reagan's "evil empire".
                      3. 0
                        30 January 2016 22: 57
                        Quote: GRAY
                        This does not happen in nature, however, as well as absolute evil


                        In nature - can not be. For God and Satan are beyond nature.
                      4. 0
                        30 January 2016 22: 57
                        Quote: GRAY
                        This does not happen in nature, however, as well as absolute evil


                        In nature - can not be. For God and Satan are beyond nature.
              3. +3
                30 January 2016 13: 43
                Quote: GRAY
                No wonder in Christianity it is believed that a repentant sinner is more valuable than a righteous one.

                laughing LAUGHING OUT LOUD! lol
                Keep me seven ... Comfortable however! All my life to do g * ovno, and in the end to become the right dude. Well, right about EBN. Standard, his mother ... Do you speak more worthy of the righteous? fellow
                1. 0
                  30 January 2016 18: 57
                  Quote: Oorfene Deuce
                  LAUGHING OUT LOUD!
                  Keep me seven ... Comfortable however! All my life to do g * ovno, and in the end to become the right dude. Well, right about EBN. Standard, his mother ... Do you speak more worthy of the righteous?

                  I’m smiling ... Well, maybe they put coal for boilers to carry it ... as a ten's manager ...
                  This is also possible ...
                  You are not in hell yet. That's when you get then you will know everything.
                  1. -1
                    30 January 2016 20: 33
                    Quote: GRAY
                    You are not in hell yet. That's when you get then you will know everything.

                    Without fail ...
                    But what immediately to hell? Although all right, the atheist will still be - hell, heaven or whatever Valhalla.
                    1. 0
                      30 January 2016 21: 31
                      Quote: Oorfene Deuce
                      But what immediately to hell?

                      This is just life. Only sinless, pure souls go to heaven - and now estimate how many righteous people are gathered in the whole history of mankind?

                      Such that they would not commit any, even the slightest evil ... I think a maximum of forty thousand, this is not counting the babies who died at birth - the Holy Fathers say that they immediately become angels.

                      Meet me on the spot - we'll talk. laughing
            3. +5
              29 January 2016 22: 42
              Take care of Russia - take as much as you want, for one I can’t stand it and never voted for it. From take how many hosh are still in the pit and sit.
            4. +9
              29 January 2016 22: 53
              He said this so respectfully about Yeltsin. And what about Lenin? "Lenin planted a time bomb under Russia." But if you compare Yeltsin as a statesman and Lenin as a statesman, then the comparison will not be in favor of Yeltsin. And why, speaking about Yeltsin, it was impossible to say, not only what he wanted to do, but what he actually did for the Russian statehood?
              1. -2
                30 January 2016 12: 20
                Quote: Villon
                planted a time bomb under Russia "

                Nicholas II, Vladimir Ulyanov only took advantage of this mine, but he blew up not Russia, but the whole world. Geyropa would have seen her democracy ... if not for Lenin. Although judging by the cut of the "gold reserve" according to the Brest Peace, which should have been transferred through Switzerland to Germany for reparations, they managed to bring it only to Switzerland, when Germany surrendered. So let's see who was in charge of all the affairs then: Trotsky got 75 million, Sverdlov 70 million, Dzerzhinsky 65, ... 50 million went to Lenin's account. Trotsky was not from a family of millionaires, so where did the money for an estate in Mexico come from? After all, the ardent revolutionary did not live poorly among the capitalists ...
                1. +1
                  30 January 2016 14: 37
                  Quote: shasherin.pavel
                  So let's see who headed all the affairs then: Trotsky got 75 million, Sverdlov 70 mil., Dzerzhinsky 65, ... 50 million went to Lenin's account.

                  Please read the sources of your knowledge. Otherwise, your message is similar to Goebbelsyat.
            5. -6
              30 January 2016 02: 25
              Are you really that narrow-minded person? You really don't know what an official statement is and that they rarely reflect an official position?
              damn why everyone who knows how to manage the country are already working as taxi drivers.
              1. +4
                30 January 2016 09: 49
                That "an official statement rarely reflects an official position" I do not know. I know that an official statement must necessarily reflect an official position. True, it is considered a rule of good form to add your personal attitude to an official statement. I agree with you about taxi drivers. But why is it so narrow? Everywhere there are those who know how to govern the country.
                1. 0
                  30 January 2016 12: 26
                  Quote: Villon
                  Where only those who know how to rule the country are not located.

                  To be honest, I don’t know how to manage the country, but my ass .. absolutely knows how not to! to rule the country...
                2. 0
                  30 January 2016 14: 05
                  I made a mistake here, I wanted to write that of. statements do not always show real position on the issue.
                  in fact there is a legend and they play it.
                  the same theme was with Lenin and Stalin, and there and there it seems to be like communism, only communism there is a different paragraph.
                  because the legend and it must be adhered to.
              2. 0
                30 January 2016 12: 23
                Just explo, dear, did you pay attention to the minuses to the simplest phrase about politeness and literacy? No ex-survey is needed ...
                1. +1
                  30 January 2016 14: 06
                  please write in Russian, otherwise I didn’t understand anything.
            6. +4
              30 January 2016 13: 37
              Quote: assam4
              I remember the words of Boris Nikolayevich, which the whole country now knows: "Take care of Russia!" - Vladimir Putin said.

              How much cynicism and hypocrisy in these words ...
          4. +16
            29 January 2016 20: 34
            Quote: vlad66
            ., the rest only spit at the mere mention of the surname Yeltsin


            Therefore, I really, really doubt that only 55% against EBN. This figure is in the region of 90%. And 55% FOR EBN is the figure of the liberals mouthpiece of the VTsiOM.
            1. 0
              30 January 2016 11: 28
              Quote: Aleksander
              Quote: vlad66
              ., the rest only spit at the mere mention of the surname Yeltsin


              Therefore, I really, really doubt that only 55% against EBN. This figure is in the region of 90%. And 55% FOR EBN is the figure of the liberals mouthpiece of the VTsiOM.

              I have the same opinion. As always, just tricky statistics.
        6. +14
          29 January 2016 20: 11
          Interestingly, "VTsIOM" (VChK) took "on the pencil" those who are still for EBNa! laughing
          Surely the very reform liberals! To the wall would have them.
          And it would be like in the good old days - "Unanimously!"


          Why take "on a pencil" - they are already in plain sight ...
          1. -3
            29 January 2016 21: 06
            And what did you prove with this? And what - they wanted to prove?

            It is optional to answer (you understand laughing), just interesting - Thu you suddenly decide to answer ..

            Friday evening .. be careful Yes
          2. 0
            29 January 2016 22: 42
            I believe that does the right thing. Do not shoot the past with a pistol - the future shoot you with a gun.
            1. +2
              30 January 2016 12: 33
              Who forgets the mistakes of the past is doomed to survive them twice, thrice ... You need facts, so study the names of those who lived during the time of Boris Godunov and Boris Yeltsin, do you want another Boriska in our history? Why can Stalin be shot from a cannon, but not Boriska ?!
          3. +8
            29 January 2016 23: 43
            What is this? Like a "mausoleum" in Sverdlovsk ..?
            Countrymen beyond the Urals! What are you .., EVERYTHING in a trance from his nominee.?
            Didn’t you pound the streets of Moscow with miner's helmets ..?
      2. +35
        29 January 2016 17: 42
        Quote: Letun
        And here the question arises. And what for did they vote for? I have never abandoned the bulletin for this alkanaut, I asked the others and heard pathetic answers like: "We vote not for Yeltsin, but for reforms." The reformers are bad ...

        Chubais with a box from a copier knows HOW "we" voted ... The stump is clear, the heart ... By the way, according to the documents, the box is ownerless, i.e. treasure. The officer who "found" the box, in the early 2000s, joked - demanded a percentage of the found treasure. laughing Naturally, talked ...

        Joke in the subject -

        Elections 1996, the country votes with a heart, Yeltsin regains consciousness in a hospital after heart surgery. Near Yastrzhembsky - a man with a gutta-percha spine:
        - The elections, Boris Nikolayevich, were held while you deigned to be under anesthesia. Two news - bad and good. Where to start?
        - Well, come on with the bad ...
        - Zyuganov won 58% of the vote in the elections ...
        “What good then?”
        - And you, Boris Nikolayevich, 64% ...
        Chubais is generally a big fanatic in terms of interest and mathematics ... laughing
        1. +7
          29 January 2016 17: 45
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Chubais with a box from a copier knows HOW "we" voted ... [/ b] The stump is clear, with his heart ...

          Yes, that’s the point, I’ve talked with people, they really did vote. Well, at least those with whom I had to talk.
          1. +25
            29 January 2016 17: 54
            Quote: Letun
            then I talked with people, really they voted. Well, at least those with whom I had to talk

            Talk to me - I have never voted for EBN. At least in this matter, my conscience is clear. I don’t know if this fact will be counted at the Last Judgment, but at least I did something useful in my life. smile
            1. +61
              29 January 2016 18: 07
              Quote: Ami du peuple
              Talk to me - I have never voted for EBN. At least in this matter, my conscience is clear. I don’t know if this fact will be counted at the Last Judgment, but at least I did something useful in my life.

              But someone is minus ... Someone does not agree, for some, the memory of Yeltsin is sacred ... So that the earth is glassy to him ...
              1. +15
                29 January 2016 19: 50
                Not just glassy, ​​but with coarse stuffing! His grave must be filled with lime so that the infection does not spread.
              2. +9
                29 January 2016 21: 08
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                Quote: Ami du peuple
                Talk to me - I have never voted for EBN. At least in this matter, my conscience is clear. I don’t know if this fact will be counted at the Last Judgment, but at least I did something useful in my life.

                But someone is minus ... Someone does not agree, for some, the memory of Yeltsin is sacred ... So that the earth is glassy to him ...

                Wow ! He even put a monument in the form of a broken glass!
                1. 0
                  29 January 2016 23: 04
                  No, this is the memory of a broken toilet - the first working day at a construction site, where he came from and there is the first .......
              3. +5
                29 January 2016 21: 08
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                But someone is minus

                Minus IMHO are those who voted for Yeltsin .. "Yes-Yes-No-Yes", like .. well, people were mistaken, but to admit it - there is no more strength .. and put a minus - not in the face Yes
              4. 0
                30 January 2016 23: 57
                Kicking the dead with us seems to have become a trend. E.B.N. made mistakes, no doubt. But this is our former president, whether you want it or not. If you didn’t have the bravery, the courage to write all this and tell him during his lifetime, clutch the female panties with your teeth.
              5. 0
                31 January 2016 16: 22
                But what can the police not see? The monument is constantly guarded, otherwise it will be smeared with paint or broken! drinks
            2. 0
              30 January 2016 11: 42
              Quote: Ami du peuple
              Quote: Letun
              then I talked with people, really they voted. Well, at least those with whom I had to talk

              Talk to me - I have never voted for EBN. At least in this matter, my conscience is clear. I don’t know if this fact will be counted at the Last Judgment, but at least I did something useful in my life. smile

              You know, it will count. In general, this scam with the collapse simply suggests that socialism (and even more so communism) was a medicine (or, as Ostap said, opium) for the people, and not for "adequate leadership" who lived in a different world. The authorities got tired of the performance at one point and they brought the country in line with their vision. This is where the EBNam memorials come from, we strive to live according to human logic. And there this logic is apparently considered to belong to the plebs. Therefore, no one understands how it is like GDP and suddenly the EBN memorial.
              It's a shame only for the lives and shed blood of our brothers, fathers and grandfathers comrades (civil, Great Patriotic War, Afghanistan, Chechnya, and simply the 90s).
          2. +12
            29 January 2016 18: 04
            Quote: Letun
            Yes, that’s the point, I’ve talked with people, they really did vote. Well, at least those with whom I had to talk.

            I also asked. Friends, acquaintances, casual acquaintances. It was even somehow awkward - after "hello" immediately "for whom he voted." He asked different people - from drunks who came to the polls on the occasion, on the way for "Rosinka" - to bandits and very rich people associated with oil and gas. I didn't count the respondents on purpose - it was just interesting myself. According to estimates, somewhere at least 1000 times asked the question. According to election statistics, 500-600 people should have said “for Yeltsin”. And they said - a maximum of 50. Moreover, "for Yeltsin" there were two directors of factories (not Soviet, new), oilmen (not from drilling, but from the regional office of Rosneft), well, in general, it is clear who ...
        2. +2
          29 January 2016 19: 26
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Chubais is generally a big fanatic in terms of interest and mathematics ...

          I wonder where he will collect interest when his Skolkovo and Nanotech feeding troughs are closed. "
          1. +12
            29 January 2016 19: 36
            After Gorbachev's betrayal of the interests of the USSR in foreign policy, no one expected that such a thing could be done in the domestic one. Most of the population naively thought that after Gorbachev it couldn’t be worse, but it turned out as it could.
        3. 0
          29 January 2016 20: 33
          Elections 1996, the country votes with a heart, Yeltsin regains consciousness in a hospital after heart surgery. Beside Yastrzhembsky - a man with a gutta-percha spine:
          Sorry, dear! But you slightly misinterpreted the name. Evgeny Vaginovich !!!! Pertro Xiang
          called correctly - Yasrebzhensky!
        4. 0
          29 January 2016 22: 57
          Therefore, the LED illuminates our path to the bright tomorrow. Look at him like a red-haired sun.
      3. +25
        29 January 2016 17: 43
        It is enough that the organizer of the treacherous collapse of the USSR was precisely Yeltsin. With the criminal self-removal of Mr. Gorbachev, who started the country, hell knows where. Another question is who did the most evil in the end.
        1. +37
          29 January 2016 18: 18
          Quote: Reserve officer
          Another question is who did the most evil in the end.

          Yes, it’s not a question. He appointed him in advance
        2. 0
          31 January 2016 16: 25
          Quote: Stock Officer
          It is enough that the organizer of the treacherous collapse of the USSR was precisely Yeltsin. With the criminal self-removal of Mr. Gorbachev, who started the country, hell knows where. Another question is who did the most evil in the end.



          Gorbi sold the country for $ 2 billion, and EBN - for 10,5! drinks
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +20
        29 January 2016 17: 47
        I don’t know, I have no acquaintances who would vote for EBN. Then they voted with cash in boxes from under Xerox. EBN was the first pilot project of the drunk president for the Yankees robbery of the country, Petyun Kaklov has a second experiment, and it works! am
        1. 0
          31 January 2016 16: 26
          Quote: Major Yurik
          I don’t know, I have no acquaintances who would vote for EBN. Then they voted with cash in boxes from under Xerox. EBN was the first pilot project of the drunk president for the Yankees robbery of the country, Petyun Kaklov has a second experiment, and it works! am



          No need to tell tales! In the first elections, 93% of those who came to the polls voted for EBN. But he lost the second, but the red one threw ballots and voila!
      6. +15
        29 January 2016 17: 48
        Quote: Letun
        I have never abandoned the bulletin for this alkanaut, I asked the others and heard pathetic answers like: "We vote not for Yeltsin, but for reforms." The reformers are bad ...

        All this is something very reminiscent of ...
        From the name of this "magician" it becomes vomit. am
      7. +27
        29 January 2016 17: 53
        Quote: Letun
        For this alkanaut I have never thrown a bulletin,

        Don’t worry, they threw for you in all areas, and more than once .... Yes ..For me, by the way. winked .
      8. +10
        29 January 2016 18: 09
        Quote: Letun
        And here the question arises. And what for did they vote for? I have never abandoned the bulletin for this alkanaut, I asked the others and heard pathetic answers like: "We vote not for Yeltsin, but for reforms." The reformers are bad ...

        Well, you’re like a small kid. Do you know what was going on at that time? The elections were led by minke whales and the loaf was eaten, whoever doubted the result. I personally have always been committed to the communist idea, so now let's see which idea is closer to ours liberal capitalist or socially communist people. Some time ago, people still hoped that a united Russia could give the country something. Well damn what a disappointment in recent years, and then what? And then we will see smile .
      9. +4
        29 January 2016 18: 30
        Quote: Letun
        And what for did they vote for him?

        They were afraid that the next would be even worse.
      10. +9
        29 January 2016 18: 41
        and I’m honestly telling from Kuban that I don’t even know that someone from my friends would vote for him, for me the elections of those years are just one formality, for today I think that everything is also unlikely to be open and honest.
        1. +2
          29 January 2016 18: 52
          Quote: R-22
          and I don’t know that someone from my friends voted for him

          I am from Moscow and I can say for sure that the majority really voted for him. And all because of the alternative candidates was such a panopticon sho kapets.
      11. +5
        29 January 2016 19: 18
        But what about: "Let everyone take as much freedom as they can!" They took - and got chaos.
      12. +5
        29 January 2016 19: 33
        They divorced the people very well on opposing Yeltsin to Gorbachev. Did a lot of people support the Emergency Committee? It seems that this "sweet couple" Yeltsin-Gorbachev was looking for a long time. And how much is left behind the scenes. The same Yakovlev A.N. Member of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee, Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee for ideology - one of the ideologists of the collapse of the USSR.

        Former chairman of the KGB of the USSR Vladimir Kryuchkov in his book “Personal Affair” (1994) wrote:

        “I have never heard a warm word from Yakovlev about the Motherland, I did not notice that he was proud of something, for example, our victory in the Great Patriotic War. This especially struck me, because he himself was a participant in the war, he was seriously wounded. Apparently, the desire to destroy, discredit everything and everyone prevailed over justice, the most natural human feelings, over elementary decency in relation to the Motherland and their own people. " And yet - I have never heard from him a single kind word about the Russian people. And the very concept of "people" for him never existed at all "


        Despite the poor in transitions, wars on the outskirts, refugees, unemployment, new Russians with all their charms - today the country is better than 15 years ago

        (A.N. Yakovlev, 2005)
      13. +24
        29 January 2016 20: 15
        Quote: Letun
        Reformers are bad ...

        From the "grateful" people
      14. +4
        29 January 2016 20: 37
        Not everyone voted for him, 90% of the ballots were falsified, moreover, brazenly and almost openly. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation with Zyuy was sold for loot and after that their rating went down sharply, we will not see them at all in the next elections of the State Duma.
        1. +1
          30 January 2016 11: 45
          Quote: Che for
          Not everyone voted for him, 90% of the ballots were falsified, moreover, brazenly and almost openly. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation with Zyuy was sold for loot and after that their rating went down sharply, we will not see them at all in the next elections of the State Duma.

          Or maybe that's what you think?
      15. The comment was deleted.
      16. +2
        29 January 2016 20: 53
        Quote: Letun
        And what for did they vote for him?

        "Voted" is said loudly. After all, until now, no one really checked the results of those elections!
      17. +1
        29 January 2016 22: 04
        Napoleon, Amareto, jeans, gum, Hollywood video voted ....
        1. 0
          29 January 2016 22: 11
          Quote: Karlovar
          Napoleon, Amareto, jeans, gum, Hollywood video voted ....

          They didn’t vote for these nishtyaks, they sold the country for them — when they started voting, this rubbish was everywhere in bulk, but it wasn’t easier.
          1. 0
            29 January 2016 22: 50
            They didn’t vote for these nishtyaks, they sold the country for them — when they started voting, this rubbish was everywhere in bulk, but it wasn’t easier.
            only it was impossible to buy. people were not even given that impoverished wage for several months.
      18. +4
        29 January 2016 22: 32
        Quote: Letun
        Quote: wandlitz
        And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....

        And here the question arises. And what for did they vote for? I have never abandoned the bulletin for this alkanaut, I asked the others and heard pathetic answers like: "We vote not for Yeltsin, but for reforms." The reformers are bad ...


        Are you not aware that democratic elections do not exist at all for the purpose of a gentleman who does not represent the interests of those who are in charge of these "elections"? Do you still believe in "democracy" and other nonsense of the bourgeoisie?
      19. +2
        29 January 2016 22: 33
        Quote: Letun
        And here the question arises. And what for voted for him?

        So they voted for Medvedev wink
        1. +2
          29 January 2016 22: 34
          Quote: atalef
          So they voted for Medvedev

          Well, we knew who would be next. winked
      20. Mih
        0
        29 January 2016 22: 43
        https://youtu.be/-8vfOphLUJA
      21. +10
        29 January 2016 23: 27
        Those who remembered Yeltsin's achievements most often called this:
        1. revival in the country of private property,
        2. the emergence of so-called democratic freedoms,
        3. overcoming the acute food crisis that swept the country in the late Soviet and early post-Soviet period.

        1. Crime before the history of the motherland and landmines under the future of the motherland.
        2. Lies about lies. Freedom is either there or not, but what is democratic freedom, it turned out a little later. It turned out that this is when even if everything cannot be bought, then everything can be sold. So they sold their souls in the most democratic way.
        3. He piled himself, he "overcame". There would be no EBN, and such a crisis would not have reached ... In the USSR, there was no complete grocery well-being. I agree with this. I also saw half-empty store shelves in the "outback", for example, in Yaroslavl or Vladimir. But there could be no hunger, and the problem was the deficit of a part of the assortment, favorite ... But the products were natural.
        Today there would be exactly the same deficit, if not worse, if fakes and products containing different substitutes were removed from the stores ...
        I remember. how in the 1990s they bought Voymix instead of oil ... until they got smarter ...
        So this point is about the betrayal of national interests and outright lies.

        Conclusion:
        EBN does not and cannot have advantages, only complacency, self-deception and tyranny.
      22. 0
        30 January 2016 11: 31
        Quote: Letun
        And what for did they vote for him?

        And they voted for him, because he did not keep a single normal person with him. Name at least one person who is from Yeltsin's clique, now would take place as a politician. Apparently, he always chose in proportion to the glass poured and drunk ... In this case, we must remember the author and the destruction of ten most successful banks in Russia by the power of power: Selenga, Khoper, Russian real estate, etc. At first they tried to convince us that it was necessary to fight the Chechen militants. .. when they put things in order, they began to say that the war did not cost us anything, since it was still necessary to eliminate the ammunition from the Great Patriotic War. How the soldiers of this period were fed about shoes can be seen in personal documentary, how soldiers ate dogs. "Where is the money? Zin!" if you ask a question, Yeltsin goes straight to the store, and he does not drink Zin alone. At the same time, he, like Delon, does not want to drink cologne ... But for what he was doing ... most likely he turned off gasoline! I myself personally heard the phrase on the Vremya program: “Today, in the Far East, the Ministry of Internal Affairs arrested THREE WAGONS OF MONEY at the Selenga Bank !!!! For the first time in the world, money was recalculated by wagons! Wagons of which: Dollars, Pounds, If you have detained a speculator, then you must return the money to the victims of the fraudsters, but if the money taken from the fraudsters is not returned to the victims, then this means gangsters robbed the scammers, thereby the authorities signed that they are gangster power, but with the laws of thieves' communication: to take away and share this is their basic function of mathematics.
      23. -1
        30 January 2016 11: 34
        Quote: Letun
        Quote: wandlitz
        And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....

        And here the question arises. And what for did they vote for? I have never abandoned the bulletin for this alkanaut, I asked the others and heard pathetic answers like: "We vote not for Yeltsin, but for reforms." The reformers are bad ...


        They voted for him because he promised to destroy the privileges of the party nomenclature .. But it turned out as always .. wassat
      24. 0
        30 January 2016 12: 00
        Do you think we were asked ??? I was in the army when the elections were, either as president, or for the collapse of the USSR, I was against it. I asked my people in the department, everyone said that it was against, and when we announced the results of our elections, where we voted 100% FOR, I also asked others, EVERYTHING was AGAINST .... In 1989, a friend in the dorm room dragged a brochure , he praised everything, like he’s his idol, and on the cover in the Schwarzkopf style or whatever it is, in short, in profile the black head of this EBAN, I immediately thought about the pig ... And now the Ukrainians have the same story ... only we didn’t have a rabbit, there was a hedgehog instead)))
      25. -1
        31 January 2016 15: 37
        Typically, neither I nor any of my friends voted for him ... but he was constantly elected.
      26. 0
        1 February 2016 09: 03
        And 600 people gathered us on the parade ground and said who wouldn’t vote for EBN in Zinda for a week and a bad demobilization test ... So ...
      27. 0
        1 February 2016 17: 27
        I personally do not need to repent. Not voted since the collapse of the Union. But now the tough question is - will have to vote for Putin, so that they won’t get into power. But maybe a new leader will appear in our country, a worthy successor to Stalin, only this is hope.
    2. 0
      29 January 2016 17: 36
      Quote: wandlitz
      And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....

      To do this, each leader comes in his own time and each has his own difficulties. For two actions, we can say thanks to Yeltsin: for not letting go of energy prices and for putting Putin in power. If it weren’t the first, then we would be like beggars in Ukraine now. If not for the second in power, Nemtsov would stand.
      1. +2
        29 January 2016 17: 46
        EBN damn it, the humpback will shatter it, hellish bastard! I think everything is clear? But seriously, thanks to them for opening our eyes to everything! It’s somehow easier now ... Many people have dropped their masks and we see their essence as a jackal! It’s hard of course, and we don’t understand or see much more ... But Russia has chosen the right direction nevertheless!
        1. +1
          29 January 2016 18: 03
          The most
          Yeltsin's positive achievement as president
          - the fact that he stepped down, transferring power to the GDP. smile
        2. +9
          29 January 2016 18: 24
          Quote: MIKHAN
          EBN damn it, the humpback will shatter it, hellish bastard!

          Greetings, Vitaliy! hi

          You can thank Humpbacked and Alkash ONLY and ONLY for the fact that they let us know what we broke and lost, as well as for making another democratic orange revolution against Western advice impossible in Russia.
        3. +9
          29 January 2016 18: 32
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Russia has chosen the right direction yet!

          I never agree!
          1. +2
            29 January 2016 19: 08
            Quote: Saratoga833
            Quote: MIKHAN
            Russia has chosen the right direction yet!

            I never agree!

            Your right... hi I don’t want to argue!
        4. +3
          30 January 2016 20: 44
          But Russia chose the right direction nevertheless!

          The direction was chosen not by the country, but by a handful of traitors. And now we are reaping it. With a couple of million rich, and the rest have crumbs from the master's table. No science, no medicine, no education, no production. Foreign nishtyaks and the exchange rate of the dollar and oil - none of the people chose this. And now we're going to hell knows what. But definitely not to a "bright future" for the country and its people. If only for oligarchs and big officials ...
          1. +1
            31 January 2016 16: 33
            Quote: sds87
            But Russia chose the right direction nevertheless!

            The direction was chosen not by the country, but by a handful of traitors. And now we are reaping it. With a couple of million rich, and the rest have crumbs from the master's table. No science, no medicine, no education, no production. Foreign nishtyaks and the exchange rate of the dollar and oil - none of the people chose this. And now we're going to hell knows what. But definitely not to a "bright future" for the country and its people. If only for oligarchs and big officials ...



            The funny thing is that the Martians, playing the pipe, again lead us to the abyss, and we are silent and go ... fool
      2. +5
        29 January 2016 18: 01
        Quote: Wend
        For two actions, we can say thanks to Yeltsin: for not letting go of energy prices and for putting Putin in power.

        If Yeltsin allowed to release energy prices, then the people who had already become impoverished overnight, to put it mildly, would not agree with this.
        But whether Yeltsin himself put Putin in power is another question.
        By the way, to my shame, the first time I voted For Yeltsin, but then quickly became convinced that I was in a hurry with my decision.
        1. +7
          29 January 2016 18: 13
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          But whether Yeltsin put Putin in power is another question.

          At least when, on New Year's Eve, he made a message about the transfer of power to Putin - he looked extremely confused, and spoke rather vaguely.
          1. +2
            29 January 2016 18: 20
            Quote: EvgNik
            At least when, on New Year's Eve, he made a message about the transfer of power to Putin - he looked extremely confused, and spoke rather vaguely.

            But it seems to me that Yeltsin, even when he appointed Putin as prime minister, already knew that his resignation was a matter of the near future.
          2. +1
            29 January 2016 18: 45
            Quote: EvgNik
            and spoke rather vaguely.

            But, right after him, Putin spoke and spoke quite definitely.
            The general meaning of his speech was something like this: "There will not be a vacuum of power in the country for a minute, and if someone decides to rock the boat, then let him either prepare white slippers or crackers right away."
            From 12:18:
            1. +2
              29 January 2016 20: 39
              Quote: GRAY
              The general meaning of his speech was something like this: "There will not be a vacuum of power in the country for a minute, and if someone decides to rock the boat, then let him either prepare white slippers or crackers right away."

              I kept my word ...! Although it was not easy ...
            2. 0
              30 January 2016 09: 48
              It is difficult to convey what joy I experienced when I watched this appeal for the first time !!!!! drinks
          3. +2
            29 January 2016 20: 33
            Quote: EvgNik

            At least when, on New Year's Eve, he made a message about the transfer of power to Putin - he looked extremely confused, and spoke rather vaguely.

            we, cadets, sat in class that day. The colonel-teacher enters and begins the lesson: "I inform you that President Yeltsin is resigning." We all started discussing these immediately. He saw, understood, said: "Don't worry, this is a joke, I joked." We calmed down, and only at recess we learned that it was true))
        2. 0
          31 January 2016 16: 34
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Quote: Wend
          For two actions, we can say thanks to Yeltsin: for not letting go of energy prices and for putting Putin in power.

          If Yeltsin allowed to release energy prices, then the people who had already become impoverished overnight, to put it mildly, would not agree with this.
          But whether Yeltsin himself put Putin in power is another question.
          By the way, to my shame, the first time I voted For Yeltsin, but then quickly became convinced that I was in a hurry with my decision.



          You have nothing to be ashamed of! For the first time, 93% voted for him!
      3. +13
        29 January 2016 18: 18
        Quote: Wend
        For two actions, we can say thanks to Yeltsin: for not letting go of energy prices and for putting Putin in power.

        GDP is not merit Yeltsin, and his mistake.

        More truly, not even EBN, but the one who taxied for him since 1995. Really, if the US State Department knew what the GDP would be for Russia and America, would anyone have let him go upstairs? Pushed to hell while still alive Sobchak.

        Basically, in America from birth, for some reason, constantly "makes mistakes" - "at some point something went wrong." But THIS mistake was fatal for America. Now only sit, sigh and make plans for the Orange Revolution in Russia for 2024 ....

        SO THANKS TO SAY AN ALCOHOLIC OF ALL RUSSIA NOT FOR ANYTHING - EVEN FOR PUTIN ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          31 January 2016 16: 37
          GDP is not Yeltsin's merit, but his mistake.

          More truly, not even EBN, but the one who taxied for him since 1995. Really, if the US State Department knew what the GDP would be for Russia and America, would anyone have let him go upstairs? Pushed to hell while still alive Sobchak.

          Basically, in America from birth, for some reason, constantly "makes mistakes" - "at some point something went wrong." But THIS mistake became fatal for America. Now just sit, sigh and make plans for the Orange Revolution in Russia for 2024 ...

          SO THANKS TO SAY AN ALCOHOLIC OF ALL RUSSIA NOT FOR ANYTHING - EVEN FOR PUTIN ...


          GDP is a brilliant FSB operation to remove Harvard boys from power! And EBN went under warranty not to touch the family ... angry
    3. +19
      29 January 2016 18: 04
      Honestly, I can’t recall more than one Russian manager who would be worse than Borka !! And the Boris Museum is a great shame for my country! I believe that this museum should be converted into a museum of the genocide of the Slavs and the destruction of Russia ..
      1. +4
        29 January 2016 18: 35
        Quote: shooter18
        I can’t recall more than one Russian manager who would be worse than Borka !!
        - And Gorbachev? With his heavy hand there was a complete collapse of our country. And Gorbachev’s guilt is much greater than Yeltsin’s.
        1. +1
          29 January 2016 19: 46
          - And Gorbachev? With his heavy hand there was a complete collapse of our country. And Gorbachev’s guilt is much greater than Yeltsin’s.

          Yes, I agree, there is still to think who is worse! but he seemed to be planning a restructuring, but he was moved so quickly, and this one drank two terms altogether !!
      2. +6
        29 January 2016 18: 36
        Quote: shooter18
        Boris Museum is a great shame for my country

        But Putin is very delighted with this museum! I don’t understand this at all! A kind of smart guy.
        1. +4
          29 January 2016 19: 49
          Quote: Saratoga833
          I don’t understand this at all! A kind of smart guy.

          It's just that he has no other options suitable, everything that was good in the country, all the great achievements, all of this belongs to the socialist system, and he is an apologist for the capitalist system. Russia is in the shadow of the USSR and the GDP burns up from this, but it cannot do anything about it, because during the current period of the capitalist system, it was only possible to ruin the country into trash and now we have to deal not with its development, but "just" its restoration.
          At the same time, the people have already begun to forget the geeks of the non-Communists of the final modifications who torn the USSR apart for the sake of a sweet life for themselves and began to recall the times of socialism with nostalgia.
          It is impossible right now to prove the superiority of capitalism by deeds, so they took out the stuffed Yeltsin from the closet as the founder of the new statehood. Like, look at what kind of maladets - he did not have time to completely ruin the country, just a little bit was not enough.
          If there is nothing good in the closet, then you have to get the bad and tint.

          Py.Sy.
          For me personally, "Yeltsin Center" is closely associated with a disco or casino.
          1. +8
            29 January 2016 20: 00
            Quote: GRAY
            For me personally, "Yeltsin Center" is closely associated with a disco or casino.

            And I have a "monument" to the police patrol UAZ
            1. +5
              29 January 2016 20: 36
              White is not impressive
              with ink, the people's love for EBN is better expressed.
            2. 0
              31 January 2016 16: 39
              ABOUT! Now the right shot! drinks
        2. +5
          29 January 2016 19: 51
          But Putin is very delighted with this museum! I don’t understand this at all! A kind of smart guy.

          Yes, a lot is not clear from the outside !! Still, people like Chubais, for example, who are completely on state support, should be in camps ... Here Putin suggested that thieves be taken from the thieves, so they caught Chubais by the hand as he took the money out of the Kremlin in a box, remember? and if you dig it (vouchers, shayushenskaya hydroelectric power station, etc.), it’s not like he deserves a bullet at all, they didn’t come up with such torture, which he already deserved!
          1. 0
            31 January 2016 16: 42
            Yes, a lot is not clear from the outside !! Still, people like Chubais, for example, who are completely on state support, should be in camps ... Here Putin suggested that thieves be taken from the thieves, so they caught Chubais by the hand as he took the money out of the Kremlin in a box, remember? and if you dig it (vouchers, shayushenskaya hydroelectric power station, etc.), it’s not like he deserves a bullet at all, they didn’t come up with such torture, which he already deserved!

            They put one Martian, so the Chubais raised such a howl! And they whined until they let him out ... We must not plant them, but to the highest degree with confiscation! am
        3. +8
          29 January 2016 19: 59
          A kind of smart guy.
          And who said he was stupid? Putin is simply a faithful follower of the Yeltsin’s cause. Everything is also privatization, democratization ...
      3. -21
        29 January 2016 18: 39
        Quote: shooter18
        I can’t recall more than one Russian manager who would be worse than Borka


        I analyzed the history of Russia - I could not find worse than the EBN, but on the same level - Lenin, Kerensky and Shuisky. Fortunately, the last two were not able to steer for a long time. But if it weren’t for the time bomb laid by the bald burry scum, the EBN with its partners would simply have no chance!
        1. +8
          29 January 2016 19: 00
          Quote: Weyland
          I analyzed the history of Russia

          Tatishchev, Lomonosov, Karamzin, Soloviev, Klyuchevsky, Milyukov, Tarle, Pokrovsky, Radzinsky, Weyland ... Why do historians "shrink"? The extreme does not even have publications ... / joke /. feel
          1. -3
            30 January 2016 15: 16
            Quote: V.ic
            The extreme even has no publications ... / joke /


            There are, although not from history - but I do not publish them under anyone! tongue
        2. +5
          29 January 2016 21: 08
          Quote: Weyland
          But if it weren’t for the time bomb laid by the bald burry scum, the EBN with its partners would simply have no chance!

          Are you not a noble by chance? You are too zealous against Lenin. Apparently you regret the hereditary capital? Or do you believe in the tale - "if not for Lenin, we would have lived like France"? No, they would not live like France, at best like Portugal, at worst like a "banana republic" with a change of government every six months or under external control.
          1. -3
            30 January 2016 15: 26
            Quote: Homo
            Apparently regretting the hereditary capital?


            Of the noblemen, only my great-great-grandfather received a ducat from the camps for participating in the "Kazan conspiracy" of 1864 and, essno, the inherited capital went to his law-abiding brothers. And grandfather essno fought for the Reds. But I don't have to repeat their mistakes!
            By the way: among the White Guards, only 2% had any significant capital! And I hate the communists because they are the antichrist seed (by the way, I respect Fidel Castro very much - CHSH, he never opposed the Church!). Think about this: Lollards, Anabaptists, etc. proclaimed communist ideas precisely from the Christian standpoint: "A camel and the eye of a needle ...", "when Adam plowed ..."; Thomas More, the author of Utopia, is a holy martyr at all; the Jesuits in Paraguay created a fairly effective communist society - and it fell because of the external aggression of the many times superior forces of the enemy, and not from the betrayal of the elite, as we have - that is, before Marx, all communist movements were completely Christian - and only here anti-Christian communism prevailed !
        3. -6
          30 January 2016 15: 14
          24 minuses ... Look, how many commies undercut on the forum hang around! I’ll add to you now - both EBN and Gorbi - typical Communists, and there is no faith in you and never will be! You pissed off your chance, there will be no second!
          1. 0
            31 January 2016 16: 45
            Quote: Weyland
            24 minuses ... Look, how many commies undercut on the forum hang around! I’ll add to you now - both EBN and Gorbi - typical Communists, and there is no faith in you and never will be! You pissed off your chance, there will be no second!



            all communists were shot in 1937, the rest died in the war. And Gorby and EBN are opportunists!
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. The comment was deleted.
        6. -2
          31 January 2016 12: 57
          26 minuses - and one attempt at a substantive objection? Hey, 25 cowardly commies - essentially nothing to argue? Drain counted!
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +5
        29 January 2016 19: 19
        Quote: shooter18
        Honestly, I can’t recall more than one Russian manager who would be worse than Borka !! And the Boris Museum is a great shame for my country! I believe that this museum should be converted into a museum of the genocide of the Slavs and the destruction of Russia ..

        The Yeltsin Center is an insult to the vast majority of citizens of our country! I believe that not indifferent people passing by the Yeltsin Center should defiantly spit in his direction, thereby at least expressing their civic position! In Ukraine, they would have thrown paint for a long time and would have been burned altogether!
        1. +2
          29 January 2016 19: 42
          Stas157
          In Ukraine, they would have thrown paint for a long time and would have been burned altogether!

          Would you go from here with your tales !! Biden sits at the head of the table and indicates what needs to be done ... and indeed there are a lot of examples about your great hohland ... and everyone can thinklessly burn, do not break them ... you need to remake this museum into the Museum of the Slavic Genocide and collect everything there facts, including political ones, which we are now observing and free to bring schoolchildren from all over the country to this museum to learn the mind of the mind ...
          1. +2
            30 January 2016 06: 49
            Quote: shooter18
            Would you go from here with your tales !!

            Oh! But the fact that??

            Quote: shooter18
            Biden sits at the head of the table and indicates what needs to be done ...

            Biden came for a few days, sat and left! In Ukraine, in general, power does not control the people. This cauldron of contradictions and anything is possible there! Therefore, the collapse of Ukraine began.

            Quote: shooter18
            and generally a bunch of examples about your great hohland ..

            And where did you get it, "pesatel", this is my hokhlyandiya ??? I just sympathize with the DNI and the LC!

            Quote: shooter18
            .. you need to remake this museum into a museum of the genocide of the Slavs and collect all the facts there

            Dream, dream, hell messenger, the Yeltsin Center was opened, just for the opposite purpose, and you weren’t asked about it! Although the vast majority of the people are against it! I’ve even given you a plus, albeit for a crazy idea. I, I think, and not only in my heart, have painful feelings about the opening of the Yeltsin Center by Putin and Medvedev! For me, this is a symbol of humiliation and shame, which I experienced torn to shreds, my long-suffering Russia, in the 90s!
      6. 0
        29 January 2016 22: 41
        Quote: shooter18
        I believe that this museum should be converted into a museum of the genocide of the Slavs and the destruction of Russia ..

        The idea is good, but for the fact that RUSSIA is written with a lowercase letter, I put you a minus
    4. +14
      29 January 2016 18: 06
      Well, it is clear that not everyone has a negative opinion about Eltsin.
      50% is very small!
      So there are those who believe that this scum was useful to the country !?
      And this suggests that society is still seriously ill.
      The question is, however, who conducts these polls and how?
      Eltsin times - THESE IS THE WORST TIME IN RUSSIA OVER 50 YEARS! And from everyone who considered and considers himself his "comrades-in-arms" (or better - accomplices), you need to ask in the Stalinist way!
      1. +3
        29 January 2016 18: 22
        Quote: Skif83
        So there are those who believe that this scum was useful to the country !?
        And this suggests that society is still seriously ill.

        This fact is very painful.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +11
        29 January 2016 18: 41
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        Chubais is generally a big fanatic in terms of interest and mathematics ...
        By the way, did you hear the news? !! RUSnano and Skolkovo recognized as ineffective crying and their abolition is being prepared. The abolition commission will be led by Dvorkovich. I wonder what the redhead will do this time ..?
        1. +2
          29 January 2016 18: 48
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          I wonder what the redhead will do this time ..?

          And "the red cat is always Shrovetide."
        2. +19
          29 January 2016 18: 50
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          I wonder what the redhead will do this time ..?

          And what we have collapsed the least - for that and take ...
          1. +6
            29 January 2016 21: 09
            Redhead on sterilization for the genocide of the Russian people. Hands chop off a little.
          2. +3
            29 January 2016 22: 11
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            I wonder what the redhead will do this time ..?

            And what we have collapsed the least - for that and take ...

            An interesting photo with Chubais, as the saying goes, "on the thief and the hat is on fire" laughing
          3. 0
            29 January 2016 23: 42
            The rat is boiling with a mind indignant in connection with the abolition of Rosnano
          4. 0
            30 January 2016 10: 07
            ! How does his land wear?
          5. 0
            30 January 2016 17: 48
            It will not take it anymore - since neither is it already.
        3. +6
          29 January 2016 19: 03
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          I wonder what the redhead will do this time ..?

          He would be engaged in sewing rays, in places not so distant.
        4. -3
          30 January 2016 06: 19
          He must be in Syria instead of Assad! And America will lag behind us!
        5. 0
          31 January 2016 16: 49
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Chubais is generally a big fanatic in terms of interest and mathematics ...
          By the way, did you hear the news? !! RUSnano and Skolkovo recognized as ineffective crying and their abolition is being prepared. The abolition commission will be led by Dvorkovich. I wonder what the redhead will do this time ..?


          He is a Mason. Therefore, he will find another feeder .... drinks
      4. 0
        29 January 2016 21: 10
        Quote: Skif83
        50% is very small!

        You need to understand the sharp jumps cause suspicion, so everything is fine - every year 10-15% increase is taking place. By the next presidential election just 99% percent will be typed.
    5. +9
      29 January 2016 18: 27
      It is surprising that in general there are Russians who perceive the figure of Yeltsin positively, although he is barely the same state criminal as Gorbachev! Standing at the origins of the collapse of my homeland! I really hope that he is in hell!
      1. +3
        29 January 2016 19: 06
        Quote: Finches
        It is surprising that in general there are Russians who perceive the figure of Yeltsin positively,

        If such a poll is carried out on "Echo of Moscow", then there will be ninety percent.
        1. +4
          29 January 2016 19: 48
          So there 90% of pidyrasts and whores from 3% of the population of the informal opposition hang out! They do not take them into a decent society, so they hang around in their garbage! After an hour of listening to "Echo of Moscow" I then need to reset to zero for a week - so much shit on Russia on the BBC does not give out in a week!
    6. +5
      29 January 2016 18: 31
      Quote: wandlitz
      Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power ....
      - Yeltsin was not dragged, he himself was a bulldozer. Tk loved power very much. And because of this "love" of his, Russia still cannot come to its senses.
    7. +9
      29 January 2016 18: 40
      Stalin good Khrushchev fool , Brezhnev- stop , Gorbachev- am Yeltsin angry Putin what
      1. +2
        29 January 2016 18: 53
        Stalin - with hair, Khrushchev - bald, Brezhnev - with hair, Gorbachev - bald, Yeltsin - with hair, Putin - not bald yet! smile
        1. +3
          29 January 2016 19: 43
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Putin is not bald yet!


          but the fact that? Are you bald not bald?
      2. +4
        29 January 2016 18: 56
        Chernenko forgot, always forget him laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +3
            29 January 2016 19: 19
            Quote: Koshak
            Andropov was not remembered either

            By the way, bald. smile
        2. +1
          29 January 2016 19: 10
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Chernenko forgot, always forget him

          I remember Chernenko - on TV I saw him being carried on a carriage. True, I was 5 years old then, but for some reason I remember it.
          1. +3
            29 January 2016 19: 35
            So we are almost the same age. In the 82nd I was taken to the neighbors (they had a color TV) to watch Brezhnev's funeral. And I was then six years old. I remember well how they drove on a gun carriage, how we carried awards on red pillows and how my neighbor and I we play cars on the carpet in front of the TV.
            1. 0
              31 January 2016 16: 53
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              So we are almost the same age. In the 82nd I was taken to the neighbors (they had a color TV) to watch Brezhnev's funeral. And I was then six years old. I remember well how they drove on a gun carriage, how we carried awards on red pillows and how my neighbor and I we play cars on the carpet in front of the TV.


              And he stood in a store in Moscow and didn’t sell anything to me! Why? Mourning! Brezhnev is buried! Ahhhh! Just business .. Yes, what are you! This is such a man! drinks
        3. +2
          29 January 2016 19: 12
          Andropov was not remembered either.
          And this is finally a masterpiece:
          "overcoming the acute food crisis that gripped the country in the late Soviet and early post-Soviet period."
          Well, yes, "first we create difficulties, then we heroically overcome them." Overcoming, Karl !!!!!
      3. +2
        29 January 2016 22: 47
        Quote: Sveles
        Stalin-, Khrushchev-, Brezhnev-, Gorbachev-, Yeltsin-, Putin-

        Teddy bear where are you doing?
        I demand to "finish off" the priority list for historical justice!
        No matter how - Four lost years!
    8. +6
      29 January 2016 18: 54
      Quote: wandlitz
      And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
      Well, it was necessary to drag such a person into power ..

      It is not clear why, given such an opinion of the people, the Ekb otrohali "Yeltsincentrt". It's like opening the center of false Dmitry or Mazepa with Vlasov. Why do we need the center of the traitor's name?
      1. +7
        29 January 2016 19: 26
        And you carefully listen again to Putin’s speech on this liberal-Jewish Sabbath and everything will become clear to you .....
      2. +5
        29 January 2016 22: 33
        In Ukraine, they praise the traitor to Bandera, in Russia they try to praise the traitor Yeltsin. American ears stick out here and there. And the 5th column in action.
        Thank God, in Russia people are wiser than Ukrainians. Does not accept enemy propaganda.
    9. +4
      29 January 2016 19: 18
      Quote: wandlitz
      And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
      Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power ....

      Yeltsin is not a man, but .... on, the drunk who drank the country. When he died I rejoiced, although this is a sin. Here's another Medvedev to drive a filthy broom along with the Ministry of Finance and education.
    10. -5
      29 January 2016 20: 21
      So the people themselves dragged through the voices!
    11. -1
      29 January 2016 20: 50
      A VTsIOM poll showed that the number of Russians who perceive Yeltsin’s political figure negatively increased significantly.

      And what's so surprising?
    12. -1
      29 January 2016 21: 55
      Quote: wandlitz
      And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
      Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power ....

      Here you all threw Temko for a talk, how many times today Yeltsin will roll over in his grave! Take a darling today, right? The funny thing is that many of you voted for him.
    13. 0
      29 January 2016 22: 32
      Quote: wandlitz
      And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
      ...

      Yes, it’s hard to fix in 16 years what you screwed up for 8.
      1. 0
        29 January 2016 23: 37
        God's chosen people in the subject - a man was nailed to a piece of wood nailed in a couple of minutes with ease! Only then did it take more than a dozen years and thousands of lives to appreciate their nimbleness ......
      2. +4
        30 January 2016 00: 10
        Quote: atalef
        Yes, it’s hard to fix in 16 years what you screwed up for 8.

        Cut off the head - one stroke of the ax.
        And try to sew back.

        That's also with the restoration of the USSR.
        We will definitely restore it and keep the name, but the path to this is long and hard ...
        And not the fact that peaceful and well-fed ...
        And it is still not known who will be with us to the end, and who will flinch and profit without end ...
    14. Mih
      +2
      29 January 2016 22: 34
      Alcoholics should sit quietly at home and not get involved in big politics, otherwise it will work out as always - Chubais and Gaidar.
    15. 0
      29 January 2016 23: 05
      16 years since he left (((
    16. Sly
      +2
      29 January 2016 23: 15
      in hell burn him
    17. 0
      30 January 2016 09: 11
      apparently, the Estonian diaspora is involved for some very long)))
    18. 0
      30 January 2016 11: 24
      Yes, they set us up with Yeltsin, but I really believed him! Like the first two wives)))
      1. +2
        30 January 2016 11: 28
        Quote: 149RUS
        Yes, they set us up with Yeltsin, but I really believed him! Like the first two wives)))

        laughing Michael spoke out perfectly, the same garbage at the beginning was (plus to you from the heart))))
  2. +18
    29 January 2016 17: 33
    But were there really times when he was evaluated positively. The answer is never.
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 20: 55
      Quote: polite people
      But were there really times when he was evaluated positively. The answer is never.

      Of course you are right.
      If the people voted for the preservation of the USSR by a majority, then the EBN did not have popular support.
      Yeltsin was voted only by those who were at the trough, who made money by robbing the people.
  3. +8
    29 January 2016 17: 36
    And how else to relate to the traitorous-Gorbachev follower who drank and continued the line of the collapse of a great power? !! To the indulging liberals, the guises of the Kasyanov-Germans and the like scum? !!
    1. +7
      29 January 2016 18: 40
      So after all, even now in our government this scum is full of, starting with the Chairman! And there are not even signs that this scum will be thrown away!
      1. 0
        30 January 2016 12: 07
        raven raven does not look into the hollow)))
  4. +1
    29 January 2016 17: 38
    Yes, one, two, four, five! They haven’t asked me yet! They are cheating again (read the rules?)
  5. +1
    29 January 2016 17: 38
    Another study of public opinion in Russia in relation to the so-called Yeltsin era, conducted by VTsIOM experts, showed that the number of Russians who evaluate Yeltsin (as a political figure) has grown significantly in recent years.


    Well, there is a reason.
  6. +9
    29 January 2016 17: 38
    What are 50%, what is the error ..? Yes, there will be 95% wassat
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. +14
    29 January 2016 17: 41
    The traitor-drunk of the Motherland, who first of all reported to the United States for the "work" done, t / v / a / r / b ... angry
    1. +10
      29 January 2016 22: 53
      Quote: ia-ai00
      The traitor-drunk of the Motherland, who first of all reported to the United States for the "work" done, t / v / a / r / b ...

      And the other one, T.R., who still balamutit on urkaine, passed it
  8. +15
    29 January 2016 17: 43
    10 years later, the number of those who are negative about this drunkard will approach 100%, the remaining 20 people will remain silent so as not to trample!
    1. +4
      29 January 2016 19: 59
      The remaining 20 people will call themselves "the conscience of the nation" and will throw mud at Russia.
      From London...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  9. +16
    29 January 2016 17: 43
    Quote: polite people
    But were there really times when he was evaluated positively. The answer is never.
    Personally, I agree with you. And now - the question is in the studio - for what merits and for whose money and for whom the pompous e-center was repelled. ??? What feelings should he evoke, and what evokes?
    1. +12
      29 January 2016 17: 53
      Quote: KBR109
      for what merits and for whose money and for whom they won off the pompous e-center. ???

      future generations will be brainwashed, and it is built on budget, that is, folk money
      Quote: KBR109
      What feelings should he evoke, and what evokes?

      disgust, but as they say, what is the era, such are the monuments.
    2. +12
      29 January 2016 17: 56
      Personally, I agree with you. And now - the question is in the studio - for what merits and for whose money and for whom the pompous e-center was repelled. ??? What feelings should he evoke, and what evokes?

      This is the place where anyone can come and spit! Therefore, the center is huge - so as not to drown ... And feelings ... Talkov also sang about "gentlemen-democrats", although about others, but even now it is modern -

      We would - everyone who than, expressed gratitude:
      A thresher is a collective farmer, a worker is the key,
      Enemy of the people - with a pick, with a prosthesis - "Afghan",
      Well, I used to light someone with a brick
      1. +5
        29 January 2016 18: 30
        Thank you FANTOM-ASa and YUYUKU for their comprehensive answer. It remains only to remember that the second elections of the drunkard were "correctly calculated" and in normal countries the entire TsentrIzbirkom would have trampled the zone.
      2. +1
        30 January 2016 03: 47
        Quote: Yuyuka
        Well, I used to light someone with a brick


        I always wonder ... request Well-thought-out correct comments at the end of the list ... Are few people reading them? Or too lazy to note original thoughts?

        "+" to the author of the message ... Talkov is no longer listened to ... and even remembers ...
        1. +1
          30 January 2016 11: 37
          Well-thought-out correct comments at the end of the list ... Are few people reading them? Or too lazy to note original thoughts?

          Thank you ... voiced my doubts. Indeed, at first a bunch of comments simply on the speed of response without analyzing the article in your head and the ability to earn points with a few phrases. You have to leaf through for a long time to see what hurts and makes you think. Sometimes even very interesting information is hidden at the very end or somewhere in the outback. Yes, and brevity is sometimes not enough for some authors hi
    3. +4
      29 January 2016 18: 42
      Quote: KBR109
      What feelings should he evoke, and what evokes?

      In addition to feelings of disgust and abomination - no!
    4. +4
      29 January 2016 19: 27
      Quote: KBR109
      for what merits ... they beat off the pompous e-center. ?

      For services to the oligarchic-comprador stratum, which concentrated 95% - 98% of RFe assets in its hands
      Quote: KBR109
      on whose money ... they beat off the pompous e-center. ?

      For the money withdrawn from our salaries in the form of taxes.
      Quote: KBR109
      for whom they played off the pompous e-center. ?

      For us orphans, so that they often remember the phrase of the artist Smirnov ("Fedya") from the movie "Operation" Y "and Shurik's other adventures": "He who does not work eats! Study, student!"
  10. +17
    29 January 2016 17: 43
    This citizen sucked a party pacifier all his life! There was an opportunity to change the feeding trough, and even become its owner, with the company of accomplices he betrayed his party! Is it possible to believe the traitors? Unfortunately, the citizens of Russia believed. Now we worry about what we have!
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 03: 51
      Quote: prawdawsegda
      Now we experience what we have!


      Now it remains to check whether everyone wants to continue the banquet ... to have them? Maybe it's time to take off the pink glasses and call a spade a spade?
  11. 0
    29 January 2016 17: 44
    They voted for him, followed him. And what now, after the passage of time, expose assessment stories? At least - this is not serious. Learn, analyze.
    A well-known saying - "I would be as smart as my wife later!"
    1. +5
      29 January 2016 17: 51
      Are you sure that the necessary number of people really voted for him, so that he could take the post ??? what
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +12
      29 January 2016 18: 05
      They voted for him, followed him.

      Because they believed his nonsense as it turned out! He didn’t do anything that he promised! I didn't even lay down on the tracks! And the 98th? When he hung up noodles for everyone that there would be no devaluation of the ruble? And at this time, many in the banking sector had infa on this account and managed to hedge themselves - I personally know a person who bought several cars a few weeks before the default, his wife worked in his bank ... The question is not whether they voted or not, and what trace this "doer" left behind. He threw all who could be in his entourage, in the desire to seize power at least in Russia, got rid of the republics! Who of those present here voted for the collapse of the USSR ?? After all, it was done on the sly, everyone was presented with a fact!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +24
        29 January 2016 18: 37
        Yuyuk RU  Which of those present voted for the collapse of the USSR ?? After all, this was done stealthily; everyone was confronted with a fact!
        Everything is correct. The vast majority was for the preservation of the USSR. But it turned out as needed by a handful of traitors, led by the United States.
        1. DPG
          +3
          29 January 2016 22: 14
          Most likely it turned out as the enemy needed.
          1. +3
            30 January 2016 03: 55
            Quote: DPG
            Most likely it turned out as the enemy needed.


            It remains to understand who is now "sniffing" us thoughts about the "correctness of the decision" and the impossibility of turns and changes (by the way, all the changes will affect whom?), Who is now more at the mercy of friends, casual fellow travelers or enemies?
  12. +14
    29 January 2016 17: 46
    Apparently those who perceive Yeltsin's activity positively, managed to grab a piece from the dying country, adequate people certainly understand that Yeltsin and his gang made nasty things for Russia no less than Hitler
  13. +8
    29 January 2016 17: 47
    Sorry for the off-top.
    Before the "second elections of Yeltsin," I was bitten by a tick. Essno came to the clinic for a vaccine. The nurse asked the paramedic: what are we going to install - new or old? And then they ask me: who are you going to vote for? It's good that he was a minor!
  14. +16
    29 January 2016 17: 47
    It is not clear for what such merits the Yeltsin Center opened in Yekaterinburg?
    1. +12
      29 January 2016 18: 05
      Quote: Masya Masya
      for what merits did the Yeltsin Center in Yekaterinburg open?

      The current government has not condemned the criminal acts of the traitors of the motherland, in the government, the army, the special services, led by Yeltsin. They probably think that everything will be forgotten over time, and from the freak Yeltsin will turn into a hero thanks to false history books
    2. +4
      29 January 2016 21: 54
      Quote: Masya Masya
      It is not clear for what such merits the Yeltsin Center opened in Yekaterinburg?

      Well, accomplices.
  15. +4
    29 January 2016 17: 48
    Cases of bygone days, giving the antiquity deep ... I do not perceive the political figure of Yeltsin
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 03: 58
      Quote: slon991
      The political figure of Yeltsin I do not perceive


      You can assume that you are real Russian. For in Russia about the dead either good or nothing ...
  16. +9
    29 January 2016 17: 49
    I am surprised that not 100% negatively evaluate his work
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 18: 31
      Our country has always been famous for fools
      1. +1
        30 January 2016 04: 04
        Quote: Yak28
        Our country has always been famous for fools


        You overdid it here a bit. Our country was not famous for fools. She was famous for the talents and courage of Russian people who forged and tempered the glory of the Fatherland ...
        “The Russian land is gifted: its soil does not deplete in talents,” wrote V. G. Belinsky.


        And we always treated fools and drunkards condescendingly ... That’s what they did ... what
    2. 0
      1 February 2016 13: 17
      Do not be surprised. In fact, a lot of people made fortunes during the reign of EBN, and now there are less and less such freebies) So everything is logical)
  17. +2
    29 January 2016 17: 50
    Since it is impossible to speak badly about the dead, then I will be silent ... But think .... am
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 18: 10
      Since you can’t talk badly about the dead, then I will be silent ...

      but what bad can be said about him? A good grandfather, an excellent FAMILY ... but his deeds for the good of the Fatherland will be damned for generations ... hi
    2. +6
      29 January 2016 18: 44
      Quote: VadimLives
      Since you can’t talk badly about the dead

      BUT IT CAN SO:
      About the dead - either nothing or good. Yeltsin is dead - that's good!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  18. hartlend
    +3
    29 January 2016 17: 50
    According to the plan of Dulles (director of the CIA), Gorbachev was assigned work on the collapse of the USSR, and Yeltsin, respectively, in Russia. The people feel this, and for that they don’t like it.
  19. +3
    29 January 2016 17: 52
    Quote: TBM - 75
    They voted for him, followed him. And what now, after the passage of time, expose assessment stories? At least - this is not serious. Learn, analyze.
    A well-known saying - "I would be as smart as my wife later!"

    They also followed Moses lol
    And to vote, it’s not just to tick off.
    I had to include all the brains
    1. +6
      29 January 2016 17: 59
      Quote: Thompson
      I had to include all the brains

      They, (brains), many at that time swam in Coca-Cola and stuck with Turkish chewing gum ...
  20. +2
    29 January 2016 17: 54
    The number of Russians blaming Yeltsin and his entourage for the crisis of the 90s grew from 36% in 2006 to 50% in 2016.
    Well, who would have thought ... Or maybe the "specialists" of VTsIOM simply "took off their rose-colored glasses"
  21. +12
    29 January 2016 17: 56
    Did not have time...
  22. +9
    29 January 2016 18: 00
    "At the same time, 90% of those surveyed could easily recall the negative aspects of the Yeltsin team that ruled the country from 1991 to 2000."
    Here it is - popular recognition ....
  23. +6
    29 January 2016 18: 00
    All is correct. Every year, people get more and more information, all sorts of investigations of journalists, declassified data, defectors trying to whitewash themselves, and so on. Our people have not yet forgotten how to compare and analyze information, as they have not been forced to do so. Therefore, people who voted for EBN are now beginning to see clearly. This has always been the case. I would like it to happen in 10-15 years with the GDP. hi
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 18: 13
      brodyaga (1) BY Today, 18:00 New
      Therefore, the people who voted for EBN are now seeing their light.


      Speaking of voting. How many times he voted in the elections then, and never voted for EBN, while he did not speak with anyone, everyone voted against him, but the result was with an overwhelming majority for him!
    2. +1
      30 January 2016 04: 13
      Quote: brodyaga
      ... I wish that in 10-15 years it didn’t work out that way with GDP


      To prevent this from happening even in the near future, I would also like him to make a choice between the interests of the people and the interests of the oligarchy ... It was decided for whom he became the Guarantor ... And what does not correspond to the wishes and will of the majority, it is time to change. To begin with, decide on the issues of voting on various issues, in their authenticity and "meanness" ...
  24. +9
    29 January 2016 18: 02
    I am 100% sure that with pomp, the open Yeltsin Center in the future will still be closed as unnecessary. Due to non-attendance. Who does he need .. (nafig).
    1. +4
      29 January 2016 18: 09
      Quote: kush62
      Due to non-attendance. Who does he need .. (nafig).

      --------------------------
      Any point of receiving glass containers can be called the Yeltsin Center.
    2. Fat
      +2
      29 January 2016 18: 55
      Quote: kush62
      I am 100% sure that with pomp, the open Yeltsin Center in the future will still be closed as unnecessary. Due to non-attendance. Who does he need .. (nafig).

      It was probably not difficult to convert the experiencing difficulties at the construction stage of the RTC into a museum, and vice versa, it is also easy if necessary. hi
  25. +3
    29 January 2016 18: 04
    At the same time, 90% of those surveyed were able to easily recall the negative aspects of the Yeltsin team that ruled the country from 1991 to 2000

    You will not forget this.
  26. gcn
    +6
    29 January 2016 18: 06
    yeltsin excuse me a person who can only be written as a person who is indirectly or to blame for the death of 1500000 people
    (maybe more) like Gorbachev, I'm sorry that I do not observe spelling. I spit through the word ..
  27. +19
    29 January 2016 18: 08
    Yes, the disgrace was continuous, Th. Literally in everything. And it was Yeltsin who was the most corrupt, he created this viper, which still rules us. And he apologized somehow slurred goodbye. Okay, ABOUT THE DEAD OR ANYTHING OR THE TRUTH!
  28. +7
    29 January 2016 18: 08
    And what else positive could be expected from this ever-drunken flaw!
    1. gcn
      +3
      29 January 2016 18: 18
      This gained power over the Great Country and then simply did not know how to sell it too much ...
  29. +3
    29 January 2016 18: 17
    It’s still a shame .. it was a shame to watch the news, then drunk somewhere lying around, then let go of a puddle for yourself ...
  30. +5
    29 January 2016 18: 20
    Of course it was.
    But still he did one good deed.
    As I remember now ...
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 21: 02
      Quote: Shurik70
      But still he did one good deed.
      I remember now ..

      That's right .. I agree with you! He left ... otherwise he would have been hanged!
  31. -2
    29 January 2016 18: 23
    Yeltsin adopted Putin from Sobchak, they are of the same suit for the destruction of Russia, like cocaine prostitute Gaidar with a Georgian in Odessa. Putin and Mendel at the opening of the Yeltsin Center in Yekaterinburg stood as pioneers. Remember the Doll project.
  32. +9
    29 January 2016 18: 26
    Bring back the EBN and the humpback .... How fun was it to spread rot on the Russian people? They want to return the bastards this time ... Damn the old witch! (Sits in Russia all the same ..)
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 19: 48
      At the sight of Alekseeva, my gag reflex immediately awakens!
  33. +5
    29 January 2016 18: 28
    The number of Russians blaming Yeltsin and his entourage for the crisis of the 90s grew from 36% in 2006 to 50% in 2016.

    I am glad that the number of normal people is growing. It is sad that there are still a lot of idiots and traitors!
    1. +1
      30 January 2016 04: 18
      Quote: Weyland
      ... Grieves that there are still a lot of idiots and traitors!


      Do not worry too much, in reality their percentage is much lower, it’s just that not all questionnaire categories were reached by questionnaires ... for example, they gathered answers from those around them ... Yes
  34. +1
    29 January 2016 18: 29
    Quote: brodyaga
    Our people have not yet forgotten how to compare and analyze information, as they have not been forced to do so. Therefore, people who voted for EBN are now beginning to see clearly. This has always been the case. I would like it to happen in 10-15 years with the GDP. hi

    In this regard, it is not clear that Y.B.N. praised then. Mom did not vote for him, so her employees were ashamed. This is 2 times. And the first time they praised how! Communists. And people believed that they were used to trusting the party, they also believed in the hunchback. And Khrushchev believed --- the USSR went into space with him! And for the Komos everything had been laid before!
    And after they were praised, they began to scold and denounce Putin. Where is the logic?
    About this center is generally not clear.
  35. +7
    29 January 2016 18: 30
    It is strange that the academician drew GDP when, when explaining his idea, he read Mayakovsky’s poems dedicated to Lenin, accusing Lenin of the processes that took place in 1991. At the same time, Yeltsin and Gorbachev are not mentioned. It is these last two that must first be taken out of the mausoleum of our history: in order of priority.
  36. +7
    29 January 2016 18: 30
    All the results of the presidential and any federal elections were rigged. If Chubais was caught with a "box from a copier full of greens" he remained unpunished after the shooting of the White House, in front of which snipers from the surrounding houses were shooting provocatively both of them. Before the 1996 presidential election, for the first time in the history of state diplomacy, large quantities of cash were brought in, then the election definitely could not be fair.
  37. +3
    29 January 2016 18: 34
    In a word I sold and drank
  38. +15
    29 January 2016 18: 34
    Looking at this photo at the opening of the Yeltsin center, I always think that we are still riding the Yeltsin trolley bus, because the trolley bus goes by wire and where these wires lead to, who laid them, and if the trolley bus has a battery, if you suddenly need to change the route , and maybe we’re already driving on batteries, but will there be enough power reserve. Many questions, I have no answers yet, only hope remains.
    1. +3
      29 January 2016 18: 39
      Quote: Anatol Klim
      Many questions, I have no answers yet

      There are answers, only we are not ready to perceive them yet, or do not want to.
      Quote: Anatol Klim
      only hope remains.

      And then with it, just, many do not want to part.
      1. +1
        29 January 2016 19: 10
        Quote: PHANTOM-AS
        There are answers, only we are not ready to perceive them yet, or do not want to.

        I sincerely envy, with white envy, that you have answers, I’m ready and I want to hear the truth, but I’ll listen to the next political expert, one speaks, the other speaks another, but no one speaks the truth, just apparently they don’t know.
        Quote: Anatole Klim
        only hope remains.

        And then with it, just, many do not want to part

        But how can one live without hope ...
        1. +3
          29 January 2016 21: 45
          Quote: Anatol Klim
          I sincerely envy, with white envy, that you have answers, I’m ready and I want to hear the truth,

          True to the surface, you need to start from the stove, the stove in this case ebn.
          Inquire about the personalities in power, at least in the part that is freely available, see how citizens, Kudrin, Gref, Medvedev, Sobchaks, the President, Kovalchuk, Rottenberg, Timchuk, Naibulins, Surkovs, Valoshin, Dvorkovich, Sechin, are related to each other, Yakunins, Chubais, Medvedchuk and further down the list, Serdyukovs, Vasilievs and ..., most likely, "seyzam" will open to you Yes
          Quote: Anatol Klim
          But how can one live without hope ...

          Certainly, hopelessness is a missing option, and you need to believe only in the enlightenment of the people, to help people believe in their significance, that only the people themselves can cope with all the hardships, and in this sense, there is nothing to look at public relations ratings and think his head, not a zombie. hi
          1. 0
            29 January 2016 21: 58
            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            stove in this case ebn

            Why is EBN here - a stove? To make writing more convenient? wink

            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            see how related

            And all people are connected .. I am through three people (dead already, really .. but - the first from me in the chain - saw personally and communicated) "connected", it's scary to say .. with Lenin ..

            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            you need to believe only in the enlightenment of the people

            Soooo ...

            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            help people believe in their significance

            Nuland cookies?

            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            only the people themselves can cope with all the hardships

            Nu-nu ..

            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            think with your head, not a zombie

            I’ll say for myself - I didn’t look for years so 7 already, but last year I sold it cheaply - I wanted to eat a dog, but there was no money .. just request

            And you troll thickly .. and where is now Uncle Joe .. such a person did not .. sorry sad
            1. +2
              30 January 2016 00: 08
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              and where now Uncle Joe .. such a person did not .. sorry

              And you will cry about him, remember how, "Cry about him while he is alive", I'll tell you more, at first he was Yarosvet, then Userpik (but in those good times there was no trace of you in VO Yes ), and only then Uncle Joe (excellent, by the way, the guy gave you 100 points forward !!! good ), so that ... by
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              And you troll thickly.

              Trolling is your prerogative, but don't you knock? lol
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              And all people are connected .. I am through three people (dead already, really .. but - the first from me in the chain - saw personally and communicated) "connected", it's scary to say .. with Lenin ..

              You just do not drink "bitter", otherwise it is addictive, you know, I personally bow out hi
              1. 0
                30 January 2016 08: 44
                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                And you cry about him, remember how

                I only said that Uncle Joe told you 100 points ahead .. yes, an erudite guy - not to be taken away, but .. dogmatist .. for specific questions there were completely left answers .. in places.

                I have never said that I love the character under the name Uncle Joe. So cry - I will not, call.

                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                first he was Yarosvet, then Userpick

                Userpic - I remember such a passenger .. somehow he didn’t excite me nirazu ..

                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                You weren’t in those good times

                You, hike, are also someone's .. reincarnation .. I have the date-time of registration - honest, only the "stars" faded .. feel the difference wink

                And so - I wasn’t on the site for about a month and a half, during this time very funny guys disappeared (or simply disappeared somewhere): Lenin, Stroporez, well, and so on .. or I’m in emergency situations (it's easy check, by the way), or .. well, of course ..

                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                Trolling is your prerogative.

                Sinful .. but only in relation to those characters who really have a completely frank blizzard .. or to those who came for "stars" - these, yes, also my clients ..

                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                but do not knock?

                Hmm .. decipher .. "knocking" - it means transferring somewhere some information, in which, wherever it is transferred, are interested. For this, at least, information unknown to anyone except the "knocking" person is needed.

                What do I know about you, for example, in addition to what you wrote here? That's right, nothing ...

                The question is stupid, IMHO .. purely "sketch" is so cheap.

                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                You just do not drink "bitter", otherwise it is addictive, you know

                The basis for advice is personal experience, I guess?

                I will follow your advice .. DR I’ll note it only today - and again I will drink only my favorite drink - tea with lemon laughing
    2. -1
      30 January 2016 06: 25
      In my opinion, we have an extra row on the right!
    3. 0
      30 January 2016 17: 52
      If the battery sits at our trolleybus, they will push us.
  39. +3
    29 January 2016 18: 39
    The number of Russians blaming Yeltsin and his entourage for the crisis of the 90s grew from 36% in 2006 to 50% in 2016.

    And in my opinion 99% is a more real figure
  40. gcn
    0
    29 January 2016 18: 39
    We need to find out where the former comrade Ivanov leads and everything will be clear.
  41. +7
    29 January 2016 18: 46
    While I read all the comments, Yeltsen’s corpse made 900000000000 revolutions around its axis!
    1. +5
      29 January 2016 19: 06
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      While I read all the comments, Yeltsen’s corpse made 900000000000 revolutions around its axis!

      God be his judge .....
  42. +9
    29 January 2016 19: 02
    Putin does not separate himself from Yeltsin.
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 21: 39
      Quote: yury-1972
      Putin does not separate himself from Yeltsin.

      At the expense of "deeply understood the drama" is rightly said, because he drank in black. At the end of the reign (as it seems to me), he himself was freaking out from what he had done. "Give freedom to business", "business will do everything by itself" - he gave, let the galimous hucksters to power and the country was taken away for scrap, and the people were robbed to black hair; “America is our friend,” “there are no secrets from friends,” and in every ministry, American “advisers” help “business” and climb into secret archives ...
      _opa complete. I even feel a little sorry for him.
      But for Putin, I want to say a heartfelt thanks to the Americans - they brought it to Yeltsin’s pen so much that he remembered that he was a Russian man and not a rag, and found a way to turn the country away from the edge of the abyss, though he didn’t do it himself, but at least he found the strength to let those who could do it to the helm.
      You may not agree with me, this is purely my personal opinion and I do not want to impose it on anyone.
      1. 0
        30 January 2016 17: 55
        It’s only necessary to add that the people themselves have made quite a few efforts to take everything away.
  43. +7
    29 January 2016 19: 05
    The survey was conducted among 1600 people in 130 locations of the Russian Federation. The stated error is not more than 3,5%.

    An interesting result is a survey of 1600 people who really determine Russia's policy. What will the result be there? Evaluation of Putin and Medvedev EBN activities given at the opening of the center in E-burg. I think other dignitaries will join them.
  44. +2
    29 January 2016 19: 08
    Yeltsin and Poroshenko are twin brothers,
    Who is more valuable to America?
    We say Yeltsin, we mean Poroshenko,
    We say Poroshenko, we mean Yeltsin.
  45. +3
    29 January 2016 19: 08
    How can you positively evaluate this blue-haired figure, who squandered everything, huh? request
  46. +9
    29 January 2016 19: 20
    Putin gives a bow to his predecessor, promises to succeed :)

    1. +2
      29 January 2016 20: 05
      Solid liberal lies!
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. +2
    29 January 2016 19: 35
    EBN-nickname "railroad" promised a lot! But the result of his reign is deplorable: the collapse of the economy, science and education, the collapse of the Army, Navy and military-industrial complex of Russia. He completely put the country under the external control of the United States ... There was no more negative figure in the history of Russia than EBN! And VVP is forced to attend and say something at events like the opening of the EBN center. This is his path. But, as they say, about the dead is either good or nothing ...
    1. 0
      29 January 2016 19: 42
      Yeltsin graduated from the UPI construction faculty. And I personally met him live near the UPI, when he was already an ex-president, he was sociable with everyone and there was a minimum of security. Of course, he promised on the rails and he was attached Reltsin, but certainly not a railwayman.
    2. +7
      29 January 2016 20: 09
      Quote: MATROSKIN-53
      GDP is forced to attend and say something at events like the opening of the EBN center.

      Firstly, this Yeltsin center didn’t rest against me at all.
      Secondly, the GDP showed its entire liberal nature!
      1. 0
        29 January 2016 22: 52
        And with GDP, it became better and easier for me. And the pension tripled in the 10th year! And under the EBN, many officers fired because the families had nothing to feed and did not pay money. They dragged everything from the ships that they could and sold in order to somehow live ...
  49. -2
    29 January 2016 19: 59
    Honestly, I haven’t read the comments above, under the article and in the headline I’ll say: Tagged left, nuclear weapons in Russia from all over the USSR were collected. The Union collapsed - I perceive how Russia was freed from real parasites from Central Asia, and from the West. Registered VOs certainly remember the Yeltsin state of the Air Force, but Yeltsin did not take decisions on unilateral moratoriums, he frustrated the agreements of the first and only President of the CIS. He transferred powers to a suitable moment. As a result, we have what we have: Pride for the Country, for the President, for the grandchildren who were lucky to serve in the Army that grandfathers dreamed of (and the fathers did not dare to dream) And the most important argument in favor of the First President of the Russian Federation is FIRST pancake ,, Well, you know ....
    1. +8
      29 January 2016 20: 23
      The Union collapsed - I perceive how Russia was freed from real parasites from Central Asia, and from the West

      Children are also parasites, even adults ... not everyone can raise children without parental support. I’m thinking - how can we do without these freeloaders? Especially without grandchildren - the most important parasites and beggars - "grandfather - a horse!" The Soviet Union was really a single family - it traveled around the republics of Central Asia, the attitude was normal, the supply was, of course, much better than "poor" Russia ... And now the situation with Chechnya is not the same? You have to pay for peace of mind, but now you still have to keep your strength in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Or would the Americans be better off there? The average level of development of these republics was much higher than now. And Ukraine? What was she like a freeloader? How much we lost in material terms cannot even be counted ... The devastation of 45 was not even close - then we lost only in the European part of the industry, and only that which we did not manage to evacuate. And the 90s covered the whole country - I mean the entire territory of the former USSR. Powerful factories are also covered with a basin of copper, as in Russia in Kazakhstan - where I have been on business trips, now there are empty workshops with broken windows or wastelands in general.

      And about the first pancake - thank God that he was not given a second bake! I hope they put it in the pan ...
    2. 0
      30 January 2016 11: 52
      Russia in the person of Yeltsin and his associates betrayed the republics themselves (that is, they are actually relatives in spirit and history), and in addition, it betrayed millions of Russian people living and working in the republics. Until now, the bitterness of this betrayal poisons both the Russian world and relations with once close people. The fate of a huge country decided a bunch of villains, for what ??
      1. 0
        30 January 2016 12: 18
        Quote: asher
        Russia in the person of Yeltsin and his associates betrayed the republics themselves

        Um, somehow taut. Russia, represented by Yeltsin (as you put it) did not deter the republic from secession - yes, but nobody forced them out either - did it?

        You should not blame Russia for everything without considering, before that, the situation at that time in a comprehensive manner.

        The villains were then in the republics too - aren't they traitors? After all, they also betrayed us.
        1. 0
          30 January 2016 17: 35
          Hey, bro, who slammed the minus.
          Be kind, justify your position.
          Maybe you will bring such arguments, on the basis of which I am aware of my wrong ...
  50. -5
    29 January 2016 20: 02
    With the Yeltsin center, it will turn out the same as with the mausoleum of VI Ulyanov. First we go later and forget. The rating for a high-ranking deceased person in due time is determined by the number of fans for his tombstone-mummy and the museum. What about the Ulyanov Museum? How much does his mummy visit? Time will pass and the Yeltsin center itself will fade away due to the lack of interest in it. But unlike ** labeled ** the first Russian president did not celebrate birthdays with a glass over the hill and at home did not dump the Kerensky AF over the hill using a foreign diplomatic mission. over the hill money for his pocket (although he put the son-in-law on a bread feeder at Aeroflot) Nobody also forgot from the roof of which embassy the sniper shot in 93. And the country had little choice, either Yeltsin or Zyuganov. And many voted for Yeltsin to avoid Zyuganov. realizing that Yeltsin is not what it was, it would be necessary But Yeltsin, however, as well as ** labeled ** - products of the era, (Made in SLAVA KPSS)
    1. +12
      29 January 2016 20: 36
      Did Yeltsin not run to consult with the US Embassy during the Emergency Committee? And I even wanted to hide there, as a fallback. And why did American specialists work in ministries in the 90s and privatization was carried out under their dictation? That's where the millionaires and billionaires came from.
      1. 0
        31 January 2016 18: 39
        In the ministries, Siluanov and Ulyukaev still have US citizens as assistants. It is possible that they are CIA officers. The same situation is possible in the Central Bank. This is where the FSB looks? US citizens, when they receive a passport, swear everywhere and always protect only the interests of their country. The interests of other countries, including Russia, are not a priori included in their sphere.
    2. +1
      30 January 2016 08: 14
      Quote: AIR-ZNAK
      Either Yeltsin or Zyuganov And many voted for Yeltsin so that it was not for Zyuganov that they understood that Yeltsin wasn’t what was needed, but Yeltsin, however, as well as ** labeled **, are the products of the era, (Made in GLORY of the CPSU)

      You are another liberal and admirer of Judah, if you were born after 91, then it’s excusable, you can go to Ukraine there EBN is loved, and do not touch the Communists who put millions of lives for your life. Vrazhina.
  51. +5
    29 January 2016 20: 14
    Now explain to me, gentlemen who scold Yeltsin and are lovers of Putin, how does it all fit in your head? Wasn’t it Putin who built the Yeltsin Center using budget money, your money? Isn’t it Putin who constantly praises Yeltsin and swears that he will continue and continue Yeltsin’s work?
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 04: 33
      Quote: Gardamir
      ...Isn’t it Putin who constantly praises Yeltsin and swears that he will continue and continue Yeltsin’s work?


      You are already on the second page...don’t wait for answers to the Christian axioms...I will answer you, while various “strays” like Chubais are near power, and a “time lord” is put at the head of the government, and opinions are formed on the statements of “expelled ministers” Kudrinykh,” it remains to state this obvious, but not universally understood, fact:
    2. +2
      30 January 2016 10: 36
      On his conscience are almost 10 million lives of Russians, the complete collapse of the Russian economy, and it is impossible to list in the comments all the “merits” of this drunk!
  52. +4
    29 January 2016 20: 19
    Yeltsin created the genocide of the Russian people, and we are building memorials for him with our money, let Naina build and maintain this shame
  53. -1
    29 January 2016 20: 23
    What does Boris have to do with it? It all started with Gorby. He just started the comprehensive collapse of everything... Yeltsin may have had good intentions, but they stupidly took advantage of them. So I think that some of the blame is on him, but in fact we need to take Gaidar by the balls (but it’s too late), Chubais and everyone else...
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 23: 07
      EBP had a chance to save the union, but he screwed up. I hate this chronicler more than the hunchback. Remember how the wedge laughed at him. I was ashamed of the country. It seems to me that the KGB officers removed him when they realized where he was leading the country. He didn’t leave on his own and I want to forget everything what is connected with it.
  54. +6
    29 January 2016 20: 25
    Boriska? Boriska for the kingdom? So he, the evil one, paid the despicable for the kindest thing, and he himself wanted to reign and rule everything?! Guilty of death!
    Classic though..
  55. +1
    29 January 2016 20: 31
    The problem of the Yeltsin Center and the mausoleum, it seems to me, are two sides of the same coin. Take out Ilyich - the groan will go throughout the country. Well, there is still a generation alive that wore October badges. Closing the EBN memorial is an additional trump card for the liberals and all the foreign trash. Probably, the Darkest cannot allow himself and the entrusted country to give his enemies a trump card for new sanctions. In general, because of an empty person. I think our children will put everything in its place. There was a Lenin museum in Tashkent. Well, Ulyanov has ceased to interest the Uzbeks. They just took it and made it a museum of the history of Uzbekistan. I think it's logical.
    1. 0
      29 January 2016 20: 45
      The darkest cannot afford the entrusted country,
      Why do you call him the darkest?
      1. 0
        30 January 2016 00: 11
        Why... Because what he thinks is hidden behind seven seals. Let it be better than like EBN...
  56. +1
    29 January 2016 20: 31
    Quote: wandlitz

    Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power ....

    Say thank you to mom and dad. Also thank the miners of all Rus', who in 91 banged their helmets and shouted Yeltsin! Yeltsin!, and in 93 the highways were blocked with pickets because they stopped paying salaries. I watched this farm on TV when I was a kid. It was still fun.
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 23: 26
      Quote: Undermining the Foundations
      Also thank the miners of all Rus', who banged their helmets and shouted Yeltsin in 91! Yeltsin!,

      Off topic ...
      On the humpbacked bridge, miners were banging their helmets much later than 91. Under those knocks, a good woman, I. Khakamada, came forward with a recommendation to the starving people - to go collect wild plants, that is, to switch to pasture.
      Now she, in the camp of Kasyanov and Ryzhkov with Mitrokhin, cares about the fate of the country and the “genocide” of compatriots deprived of Parmesan and jamon with Hennessy.
      In general, Boriska Yeltsin, the great man’s personality is rotten and will be cursed by his descendants for centuries, just like Boriska Godunov, for the actions of both of them in the history of Russia will be spoken by the people with very obscene words and called “the time of troubles.”
  57. +3
    29 January 2016 20: 32
    The majority of the people were definitely for Borya. Because everyone was already tired of Gorbachev by then. And they considered this the best way out of the situation. This once again shows that the role of the individual in history for Russia is extremely great, in contrast to other capitalist countries. This was the case under Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev... Except for Andropov and Chernenko, since they did not have time to get used to them due to their short reign. And the national party elites were also not against Bori, since his activities to isolate Russia from other republics gave them the opportunity to seize their power.
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 04: 41
      Quote: kuz363
      The majority of the people were definitely for Borya...


      Don't rely on this unambiguousness. It sounds straight out of Zhirinovsky. Rather, this choice was made due to the usual lack of alternative to cancer. They put the majority in a certain position and offered them a choice: continue to “have fun” in the same state or try!!! find a better position. In our case, Gobachev was opposed by Yeltsin. It worked...
  58. The comment was deleted.
  59. +1
    29 January 2016 21: 06
    I never voted for Yeltsin, and a new Yeltsin will come, I will never vote for him. I have the honor soldier
  60. 0
    29 January 2016 21: 14
    Yes, your VTsIOM is bullshit, all normal people since 93 understood what EBN was. And this information is a signal that domestic policy may radically change.
  61. 0
    29 January 2016 21: 26
    Yes, I'm already sick of this. For the people, EBN and Gorbaty remained traitors. But the country was brought to this state thanks to the previous leadership. Who can now say who owned the idea of ​​the collapse of the USSR and the transition to capitalism? The opinion of the people about the collapse of the USSR was ignored, and no one asked the people about the next steps.
    So in the end we got it....Now understand, should we completely trust the current government? When this government supports and even (I don’t know how to put it) open centers for these scoundrels and reward them.
    Briefly speaking! Putin, of course, is great for supporting our troops and police.
    Well, the people will somehow survive fellow
  62. +2
    29 January 2016 21: 32
    It’s either good or nothing about the dead, yes, I don’t even want to hear anything about him. I don’t want to remember this drunk who peed on the landing gear of the plane, snatched the baton from the conductor’s hands and conducted the orchestra; the stupid, uncultured animal in power degrades even more, sinks even lower. Somewhat similar to Sharikov. And look at Putin - whatever he is, in most cases it’s pleasant to watch and listen to him.
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 23: 11
      This does not apply to this dead man. Damn him.
  63. 0
    29 January 2016 21: 53
    When the change from Gorbachev to Yeltsin took place, my late boss, and he knew him, when asked who was better, answered unequivocally - currently Yeltsin is better, although he is a complete g..., he is needed to change the worldview - people need to get out of the habit from communist habits, there is no return to them.
  64. +1
    29 January 2016 22: 09
    What was the survey supposed to show? Gorbachev is guilty of many troubles in the USSR, but not of its destruction. Since 91, we have been taught that it is Gorbachev who is to blame for the collapse of the USSR, with the sole purpose of taking Yeltsin and those attracted by him, who also dreamed of becoming appanage princelings, beyond the scope of responsibility - Kravchuk and Shushkevich.
  65. 0
    29 January 2016 22: 17
    We live by promises to live better and more fun, but no one knows exactly when this will come. In the 90s, after the Soviet Union collapsed and the oligarchs came to power, we finally... became of no use to anyone. The first President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, about whom they enthusiastically said: “This one will build real socialism,” unexpectedly proclaimed freedom for everyone - and that’s where it all began! 1990 unprecedented increase in crime; 1992 - shutdown of factories and delay of wages; 1993 - execution of the Supreme Council, hyperinflation, theft of the pension fund and collapsed privatization, mass layoffs and freezing of deposits; 1994 - the mortality rate in the Russian Federation exceeded the birth rate for the first time... In general, we lived happily and freely, as promised by the “beloved leader”

    Today we discussed Putin and his oligarch friends. These guys are really doing well and they are not thieves at all - global capitalism is to blame for everything. All that remains is to add - with the departure of the first president of Russia, an entire era has passed away... and an entire Country, which neither the Putins nor the Chubais will ever return - “Thank you” to you Boris Nikolaevich!
  66. +3
    29 January 2016 22: 36
    On August 21, 1991, or more precisely from August 20 to 21, he was a commander in a separate division of the S-300 air defense system. In the evening we arrived from the center. Regiment estates check the performance of service. You can guess why. First of all, they checked the weapons, ammunition, order, soldered a reprimand for the jackdaw that the check was done as it should be, they entered it into the personal file right away. And then the monetary allowance began to be delayed, and not for a month, rations were delayed for almost a year (it was then that everyone switched to providing food, they did not give out clothing at all (even on the parade ground they were brought to the step for the dress code, although the arguments for this reason were accepted and were not allowed to face disgrace). The regiment commander loudly allowed the officers to earn extra money on the side in their free time from service, only without connections with crime (they worked mainly in unloading and loading operations). There was even a meeting on how we evaluate our division commander and who we want to see in this place (we wrote on a piece of paper and threw it in the trash can), it’s good that we didn’t think of attracting L/S. Well, purely February bourgeois. We were forbidden to go outside the unit in uniform, even earlier Gorbaty forbade us to go to a restaurant in uniform. War in Chechnya, during the reading of orders, they reported on the increasing frequency of beatings of officers, soldiers are openly begging, etc. It’s a pity that I didn’t rush from this guard to defend the State Emergency Committee, or to defend the White House. I think that Yeltsin and the shitcrats who take advantage of his drunkenness and ambitions are to blame for all this. And the percentage of negativity will only increase, the stronger we become. He brought the Russian Armed Forces to its knees.
  67. mihasik
    +1
    29 January 2016 22: 39
    Yeltsin is one of the culprits of the collapse of the USSR

    film "Ivan Vasilievich changes profession"
    Georges Miloslavsky: “Why are you, you tsar’s face, squandering state-owned lands”?!!!!
    Eh, it’s a pity that “Georges” wasn’t around when that EBN mug signed the collapse of the USSR!
  68. +1
    29 January 2016 22: 42
    judging by the number of comments he has a lot of “fans”, but actually he wasn’t the president, he was a CONDUCTOR
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 23: 35
      Quote: sery volk
      judging by the number of comments he has a lot of “fans”, but actually he wasn’t the president, he was a CONDUCTOR

      Most likely, he was a tavern pianist, above whom stood a CONDUCTOR, with whom they performed a requiem for the USSR.
      It’s a pity that they didn’t break the piano for him during the first chords.
  69. +1
    29 January 2016 22: 46
    (C) Those who remembered Yeltsin’s achievements most often named this: the revival of private property in the country, the emergence of so-called democratic freedoms, overcoming the acute food crisis that gripped the country in the late Soviet and early post-Soviet periods. (C)

    Two crimes against the people and one dummy are listed - grandiose “achievements”! 1. Private ownership of the results of collective labor. 2. “Democratic freedoms” gave the main thing - “pluralism” and the opportunity for the fifth column to openly destroy Russia. 3. The main merit of the “food crisis” is the party nomenklatura (boyars or bureaucrats of that time), who, under this noise, destroyed the USSR in order to seize state property.
  70. 0
    29 January 2016 22: 48
    Sevastopol did not vote for the EBN; then they ordered the protocols to be redone. I was in a group of comrades... so I know firsthand
  71. +1
    29 January 2016 22: 48
    They erected a monument to Yeltsin, and you asked the people, where is the monument to Stalin - or did he deserve less than Yeltsin? I’m sure the monument and the Yeltsin Center will be demolished, it’s just that apparently the time has not come yet, we don’t have full sovereignty yet
  72. +1
    29 January 2016 22: 49
    VTsIOM made another discovery; Wow.

    Screams about "red menace", about Soviet totalitarianism, about the delights of democracy and liberalism are gradually falling silent.

    But the collapse of the USSR, theft, total poverty, banditry, the brilliance and poverty of the new Russians, extinction and degeneration - this is not forgotten.

    You can’t hide an awl in a bag; no Yeltsing centers will help here. And EBN’s accomplices (who are still with us am ) sooner or later they will get what they deserve; as well as imported advisers, wherever they are hiding.
  73. +2
    29 January 2016 22: 59
    GDP needs to erect a monument for the return of Crimea and Sevastopol! For the revival of the Russian Army and Navy! Because Russia has its own opinion on all international issues and does not look into the ass of any state department and chancellor!... And only then do we kneel when we kiss the Russian flag!
  74. +1
    29 January 2016 23: 03
    We also need to measure the attitude of Russians towards Gorbachev. She's still a bastard!
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 18: 06
      Soon the Gorbachev Center will be built.
  75. +3
    29 January 2016 23: 09
    Yes, I remember. “Vote with your heart” - and they voted... But if Zyuganov had been chosen then, it would have been a completely different story.
  76. +1
    29 January 2016 23: 11
    Those who remembered Yeltsin’s achievements most often named this: the revival of private property in the country, the emergence of so-called democratic freedoms, overcoming the acute food crisis

    And also banditry, drugs, high mortality and the plunder of national property by Yeltsin’s gang
  77. +1
    29 January 2016 23: 14
    The EBNovsky Center is a monument to our gullibility and simplemindedness!
  78. DPG
    +2
    29 January 2016 23: 19
    I don’t understand, everyone here is branding BENya and saying that Marked is not in the aisles???? What are you people even talking about???? In August 91, what did the State Emergency Committee want to do? But what, they were going to take away power from Gorby and arrest BENya, no one remembers this. And the fact that VV came to power after BENya abandoned it in his favor is how????
    Have you forgotten that those who do not remember their past have no future?
    My opinion is that the period of BEN’s reign is like syphilis. The one who suffered it a second time will not wish it, but the fact that he caught it is not his fault, but some kind of institute.
  79. +2
    29 January 2016 23: 24
    I saw one guy in the early 90s with a photograph of a fucking guy on his jacket, walking around like he was wearing an icon.
    From life, before the 1996 elections, two homeless young men asked each other. Who will you vote for? Of course I’m for Yeltsin (I can’t really), otherwise the communists will come again and force me to work.
    The picture with General Swan in the elections was depressing, it sold like the last one.....
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 23: 47
      This is the current face of the site! Why the hell do you ask for military topics and analytics every time, if there are practically “zero” comments! You should be sad about this......!
  80. +1
    30 January 2016 00: 13
    Yeltsin will always be “Fighting 50/50”. Minus 50 for Chubais and Gaidar, and plus 50 for Putin.
  81. +3
    30 January 2016 00: 50
    Quote: kuz363
    the emergence of so-called democratic freedoms


    Under socialism, I could say everything to the foreman or the head of the workshop. Which I did more than once and I got nothing for it.
    Now a sideways glance can get you fired from work. This is freedom of speech.
  82. +1
    30 January 2016 04: 35
    Are they conducting surveys only among liberals and members of the government who are beholden to him (Yeltsin)? What is 36%, what is 50%? What is this even about? Oh yes, I forgot, for VTsIOM everything beyond the GARDEN RING is an unknown, wild territory. In general, strange people live there; they call themselves “RUSSIANS” by some incomprehensible self-name. It's just some kind of anachronism. Some heads of state television channels no longer even know about such people. This is where we have TINA, one big swamp and croaking!
  83. +7
    30 January 2016 04: 58
    Our people with a large share of satire. lol And we will most likely remember the EBN this way.
  84. +1
    30 January 2016 05: 13
    The period of EBN’s rule is in many ways similar to the current situation in the former Ukraine. “Maidan” in 91,93 and XNUMX, the war in Chechnya, devastation in industry, the creation of a “bazaar” economy instead of a “market” one, hyperinflation, banditry, and how the dead man drank, how he drank wherever it was sadly depressive asked! Our handsome guy was “working with documents” all the time, and various BABs freed him from government concerns. In Germany, he would get off the plane, pluck out the swollen balloons, look at the chancellor and his retinue in bewilderment, publicly wet the landing gear, and then sit back on the plane, saying, “Go to Moscow!” He borrowed money in wide tranches. In the hope that when he has to give it back, he will say that he was drunk and doesn’t remember. Now the whole Banderia simply relies on this principle!
    This is where the similarity ends. A fundamentally different basis for an outwardly similar superstructure. The main thing is the ECONOMIC basis, which allowed the Russian Federation to get out of Yeltsin’s binge and which Banderia does not have. We paid off our debts using the available resources (we are still paying them back). It is unknown how those who are in the Maidan will pay them back.
    AND THE MAIN THING: the difference between the then and current People of the Russian Federation from the sad “schenevmerls” with depressive-manic desires to kill everyone around and, if that doesn’t work out, then do more shit. They spray with bile and poison. With such a spirit and mood, you can’t build anything and you can’t get out of a rotten hole! We were much more positive and cheerful at that time. And now we have a Worthy Leader of a Multinational State, around whom we are not ashamed to rally. LET'S BREAK THROUGH!
  85. +1
    30 January 2016 05: 47
    It was not for nothing that EBN’s grave was desecrated. To the point of blowing up the concrete tricolor tombstone. Such “leaders” should be buried in secret places... and, better yet, in unmarked graves.
  86. +4
    30 January 2016 05: 53
    Oh wow! Just now I got to this “news.” I’ve never seen a more stupid creature in my life. I remember how ashamed I was for him, the freak, when they told me: “Look who rules you!” .And I, a citizen of Russia, lived in Estonia. It was a shame - not the right word! This corrupt brute betrayed us all, humiliated us, brought us down below the plinth. A drunk with a yard upbringing. Did he have anything to do with big politics? I liked the monument on the grave of the freak (I saw the photos) - cement scattered in the form of heaps of m..... True, the piles were painted in the colors of the Russian flag. I hope the paint has peeled off. And no one will touch up a bunch of paint. Let there be what should be...
  87. +1
    30 January 2016 06: 31
    And in order to close the topic, it should have been hanged back in 85. And there would be no topic, and the country would live in peace.
  88. +1
    30 January 2016 06: 52
    Ordinary people see life every day, and during Yeltsin’s reign this daily life did not bring joy at all! But complete chaos was clearly visible in a country that was united, albeit with problems. And then one continuous bandit flea market began. And there may have been merit, but ordinary people did not come in handy.
  89. 0
    30 January 2016 07: 10
    “The VTsIOM survey showed that the number of Russians who perceive Yeltsin’s political figure negatively has increased significantly” = “the number of wiser Russians has increased.”
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 07: 43
      Do you think even in those days at least someone took a complete idiot seriously? It was simply ridiculous to conduct public opinion polls back then. It was bad. Because the outcome was obvious.
  90. 0
    30 January 2016 08: 10
    Yeltsin is assessed negatively by 90%, it is the pro-government VTsIOM that gives such lenient figures, well, build another library named after EBN and the rating will fall even more.
  91. 0
    30 January 2016 08: 12
    Well, you have to understand that then we lost the war.
    Well, we got everything we were due.
    Yeltsin, for example, who led strictly at the behest of the West.
    The point here is not that he was bad, he was just a puppet of the West.
    Well, how is Poroshenko in Ukraine now?
  92. +1
    30 January 2016 08: 45
    Nonsense! Not 50% but all 99,9% would gladly spit on his grave.
  93. 0
    30 January 2016 09: 01
    Quote: wandlitz
    And there is no doubt that the period of the EBN’s rule had an extremely negative impact on our country ....
    Well it was necessary to drag such a person into power ....

    I just can’t believe that half the population is for EBN. There are not so many enemies of the liberal people...
  94. +1
    30 January 2016 09: 07
    Yeltsin destroyed the USSR at the instigation and under the leadership of the CIA. That is, he is a traitor. In 1996, the election results were rigged. He was an illegitimate president. Personally, I don't see anything good that he did.
  95. +1
    30 January 2016 10: 17
    I don’t believe that many people approve of the activities of the EBN as President, and it’s time to count and rewrite those who approve; in the near future, the lists will be in demand, I hope.
  96. +3
    30 January 2016 10: 30
    Will someone explain to me why our president erects a monument and opens (well, at least he is present with a speech of praise at the opening) the EBNu museum? Just don’t tell me that he is the father of Russian democracy, and that he bombarded Russian stores with food. Feed the liberals this bullshit morality, they happily eat it!
  97. +1
    30 January 2016 11: 02
    The number of Russians who evaluate Yeltsin (as a political figure) negatively has grown significantly in recent years. the rest just hate him
  98. 0
    30 January 2016 11: 09
    One way or another, with all the dancing essence of FUCK, he had to be. This is the logic of events. So that we know “what is bad”. Otherwise, I remember the end of the 80s. I was finishing school, the Alkanaut personality was so popular! We simply didn’t know what was bad then.
    That’s why I’m irritated by some of the judgments of my Belarusian relatives about Lukashenko. They simply did not have time to find out what a complete kobzdets is. In Russia there was ONE FUCK (now we are Russia already. Crimea and Sevastopol), but in Ukraine - ALL! It’s just that the “grades of shit” were different to a greater or lesser extent. As a positive, we can only remember Kuchma in his 1st term. And that’s relatively and not for everybody.
  99. +2
    30 January 2016 11: 44
    According to ALL laws, Yeltsin is a state criminal. For non-recognition of the results of the referendum (Belovezhskaya Accords), for Chechnya, for the shooting of parliament. But it has already been proven that the results of the second presidential election were falsified. Zyuganov won the elections, but he was afraid of responsibility and sold the results to EBN. It is a fact . Second fact. EBN had 4 (four) heart attacks during and after the elections. After this, the person is declared incompetent. Have you seen the photo of Lenin in Gorki? One on one with FUCK! The last term the country was ruled by VEGETABLES! The person could not speak, write, or think clearly. A facsimile was used instead of a signature. The country was ruled by those WHO HAD ACCESS TO THE FUCKING BODY, namely Dyachenko’s daughter, her husband Yumashev, his wife, Voloshin, Chubais - a family friend and a seven-banker. And now I repeat for the tenth time, turn on your brain. It was at this time that the ex, persecuted by the Prosecutor General’s Office, began to make his career at Chubais’ headquarters. Mayor of St. Petersburg - GDP. It was at this time that more than 30 foreign intelligence officers worked as consultants at Chubais’s headquarters. Did they recruit the flower kiosk tycoon? Question . Did they recruit the former ex-mayor of St. Petersburg? Question . But it is a fact that the benefactor of the one who allowed VVP to enter the body was Chubais! And then... Next, the GDP TAKES POWER FROM AN INCOMPATIBLE, NOT LEGITIMATE FUCK. And another interesting fact. Having taken power from a vegetable, the first thing the GDP did was to issue two extremely interesting decrees: 1) on not prosecuting the YOBNA family and his relatives under criminal charges and 2) On the acquisition with Gazprom’s money of a controlling stake in Sibneft (owner R. Abramovich - the wallet of the YOBNA family) at a market value of 500 million dollars at the time of sale for 13 BILLION dollars. Now think about who your president is.
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 17: 37
      Somehow you have mixed up human horses and volleys of thousands of guns. Formulate and argue more clearly. Pliz!
  100. +1
    30 January 2016 11: 46
    Yeltsin firmly took his place in history next to Vlasov and the like.