Military Review

Obama was advised to return to Europe the armored brigade for permanent presence

39
The National Commission for the Development of the US Ground Forces has published its regular report, which contains recommendations to Congress and the President of the United States. In the report, in particular, there is information that in Europe States need to deploy an armored brigade in the near future. Information Agency TASS results from the report:


The ground forces must carry out the advanced deployment of an armored brigade battle group in Europe. The security changes taking place in Europe, its value as a location for potential operations in the Middle East, as well as the relatively long time required for the deployment of the group indicate the need to return this unit to a permanent presence in the region.

I wonder what kind of "changes in the security sphere in Europe" are the representatives of the National Commission for the Development of the American Ground Forces talking about? Given that all modern security problems in Europe are associated with an influx of refugees from Africa and the Middle East, does this mean that American Tanks Is the US planning to apply specifically against refugees? ..

Obama was advised to return to Europe the armored brigade for permanent presence


Another question arises in this context: will the Abrams, who did not dare to transport across Latvian bridges, also be returned to Latvia “to increase the level of European security”?
Photos used:
https://www.facebook.com/USarmy
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 29 January 2016 14: 06
    +8
    "Considering that all modern security problems in European countries are associated with the influx of refugees from Africa and the Middle East."

    But what about Russia's aggressive plans to capture the unfortunate Baltic states?
    1. Maksus
      Maksus 29 January 2016 14: 21
      +2
      So we are talking about Europe, and not all sorts of limitrophes))) Europe begins with Germany, everything to the east is like this, "members" of Nata, who can be sacrificed.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 29 January 2016 14: 36
        +5
        Quote: Maksus
        Europe begins with Germany


        Europe begins with Ukraine ... everything .. basta - not discussed .. lol
      2. Maxom75
        Maxom75 29 January 2016 14: 43
        +2
        Young NATO members could not understand that their role is to become a theater of military operations. It is these states that should be wiped off the face of the earth in the first place in the event of a conflict, and then the rest of the "enlightened" Europe.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 29 January 2016 15: 50
          0
          Max 75! 14.43. Why should the Young People be the first to come into conflict? Or maybe the first conflicts will begin in Germany with refugees. Or in France. Maybe under this conflict and weapons are imported? Then the rebel refugees (along with the slaves) simply merge with the brothers of the Middle East. Or is such a scenario impossible? How will working Europeans be friends with unemployed refugees receiving benefits? Europeans were forced to work until the age of 70 to pay benefits to migrants. And the question is. Who has whom? Who are the owners and who are the employers?
      3. mahor
        mahor 29 January 2016 15: 57
        +2
        So we are talking about Europe, and not all sorts of limitrophes))) Europe begins with Germany, everything to the east is like this, "members" of Nata, who can be sacrificed.

        For three years at the military department, I studied the issue of delivering a nuclear missile strike on Germany as part of a division ... If necessary, I will remember ... drinks
      4. northern
        northern 30 January 2016 02: 04
        0
        Quote: Maksus
        members of the nat to donate.

        Well, about the "members", you, colleague, got excited :-)
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. vorobey
      vorobey 29 January 2016 14: 33
      +4
      Quote: Vladimirets
      But what about Russia's aggressive plans to capture the unfortunate Baltic states?


      they are destined to come true. the Balts are massively leaving the Baltics ... there is nobody to capture ... soon refugees from all over Europe will be resettled in the Baltics ... this is an insidious plan to expose Russia as aggressor again ... now we will want to capture the type of Africans .. laughing
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 29 January 2016 14: 45
        +1
        Quote: vorobey
        the Balts are leaving the Baltics en masse ... there is nobody to capture there ...

        It means that our people come to Latvia, and there are only "non-citizens" and five Afghans. laughing Hi Sanya. drinks
    4. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 29 January 2016 17: 57
      0
      But I wonder what kind of commission gives advice to the US president. What do they know for 10000 km, or maybe more.
      "What are the Balts? Pumpochka. So I covered them with my palm. And they are not at all."
      What to do to save the relict-pribolt?
      And can I give advice to the President of the United States, well, I know better. One brigade is not enough. I figured it out, it turns out not the rational use of ammunition. Payback starts from 10-12. Urgently 12-15 brigades on a patch, so that with one slipper, all at once.
    5. northern
      northern 30 January 2016 02: 02
      0
      Quote: Vladimirets
      [b] "What about Russia's aggressive plans to capture the unfortunate Balts?

      Yes, everything is fine, NATO just approved our tanks in Europe. Of course, they did it again, but who considers it?
  2. Altona
    Altona 29 January 2016 14: 08
    14
    Let them drive equipment, signify presence, anger locals. Apparently there is nothing more to spend money on, only Galaxy and Hercules to drive back and forth. Let this crap creep in the Baltic loamy loam and eat motor resources.
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 29 January 2016 14: 41
      0
      And we are chasing equipment in Syria do not eat motor resources ??? If they drive something or place it all for a reason. The world is now redistributing influence, the Americans are simply gaining a foothold in strategically important directions (those near us).
  3. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 29 January 2016 14: 09
    11
    Obama was advised to return to Europe the armored brigade for permanent presence
    Yes, on a drum, even if you bring all the US tanks, there is no sense from them. Here you are not Arabia, and not Africa, they do not ask "where" to bring down, they ask "who"? near Prokhorovka, there will be no more tank battles, they will rust in the Baltic, from salt ...
    1. Baikonur
      Baikonur 29 January 2016 14: 22
      +3
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      they will rust in the Baltic states, from salt ...

      So they drive here already dying rust! To suck the loot from the budget and make horror catch up on geyropotsev, like: "we will protect you from" Russians are coming !!! " laughing
  4. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 29 January 2016 14: 10
    +2
    The gangrene of exceptionality spreads over the body of the Earth. In such cases, only amputation helps.
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 29 January 2016 14: 13
      +3
      That is why I love Breedlove so much because he is pushing his figure and position as irreplaceable. With such a pace, the head of the PENTAGON will soon consult with him on any issue and what he says will be.
    2. tol100v
      tol100v 29 January 2016 14: 23
      +2
      Quote: lysyj bob
      In such cases, only amputation helps.

      That organ from which there is a general infection!
    3. dorz
      dorz 29 January 2016 14: 23
      0
      It will be even worse if you send an aircraft carrier to the Vistula or Elba. what
  5. hartlend
    hartlend 29 January 2016 14: 11
    +6
    Troops are needed so that European politicians do not buck up, and disperse protests if the population rises. The United States is increasingly looking like a decrepit lion - growling, but then there is no strength. The resources are not unlimited and you can’t print dollars so simply.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 29 January 2016 16: 02
      0
      Heartland! 14.11/XNUMX. NATO bases are needed so that Western politicians do not buck. If there is a fire with refugees, then the Amer military will urgently get on their Hercules and drop their weapons, turn on the afterburner and pull them from the supersound. And it is possible that the flight will begin even earlier. But it will not be an escape. This will be a cleaning of the territory by the natives themselves from themselves. And who will be dead there is another question. And this will not be the first territory cleared in this way. The Middle East is already clearing itself, Ukraine is starting to self-clean. Next Europe.
  6. Dbnz
    Dbnz 29 January 2016 14: 12
    +2
    Quote: Altona
    Let them drive equipment, signify presence, anger locals. Apparently there is nothing more to spend money on, only Galaxy and Hercules to drive back and forth. Let this crap creep in the Baltic loamy loam and eat motor resources.

    Three times plus !!
  7. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 29 January 2016 14: 13
    0
    I wonder what kind of "changes in the security sphere in Europe" are the representatives of the national commission for the development of American ground forces talking about?

    The second question is what specific point in Europe will this tank brigade defend?
    1. asadov
      asadov 29 January 2016 14: 35
      +1
      she will protect herself
  8. Nikolay71
    Nikolay71 29 January 2016 14: 15
    +1
    And why only one brigade group? Let’s all ten if there’s nowhere to put money and equipment.
  9. Observer2014
    Observer2014 29 January 2016 14: 16
    +3
    "Another question arises in this context: will the" Abrams ", which did not dare to transport through the Latvian bridges, also be returned to Latvia" to increase the level of European security "?"
    But what is really there. Let the rod his "highly maneuverable" armored equipment. You can still ask Israel for the "Merkava" to a heap. Except as a waste of money, this is not how not to call it. By the way, in Eastern Europe, all equipment will have to be disassembled and packaged between rivers. the form of moving pillboxes. Or build new bridges, with roads. Something tells me that Washington is unlikely to make such "sacrifices".
  10. Baloo
    Baloo 29 January 2016 14: 19
    +1
    Obama was advised to return to Europe the armored brigade for permanent presence fool
    We frayed it here and advise Obama to withdraw all American troops from the geyropa on an ongoing basis. It’s necessary marriage, it’s time ...
  11. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 29 January 2016 14: 20
    +1
    And where exactly will they place it?
  12. askort154
    askort154 29 January 2016 14: 22
    +1
    Hey Old World, wake up! The New World you have born makes you not only a bomber, but
    scrap metal dump, for your own eureka. Hitler spinning in a coffin, and Stalin grins in his mustache.
  13. Aitvaras
    Aitvaras 29 January 2016 14: 32
    +2
    It's okay. In the military doctrines of Russia and NATO, it is mutually affirmed that they are strategic adversaries. In fact, this is the declaration of the second "cold war". Is there any illusion about this?
  14. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 29 January 2016 14: 42
    +2
    They are afraid of Russia and not in vain (the stigma is in the gun of many) .. As I recall the 90s, how they robbed, humiliated and deceived .. Fists are compressed!
  15. Saratoff
    Saratoff 29 January 2016 14: 44
    +1
    And I would advise Obama not to escalate the situation. And if Europe has such a value as a place of deployment for potential operations in the Middle East, then let them place them in the warheads, they have six there.
  16. f, hfrjlf, hf
    f, hfrjlf, hf 29 January 2016 14: 46
    0
    I don’t understand. The world turned upside down. The geyropa is humiliated. I’m just sorry that they are, that is, the migrants are being torn so to speak by immigrants, so now they also went to the heap of amerikosy for fun. They raped them to work there 5 times. This is called tolerance. Fagots
  17. SklochPensioner
    SklochPensioner 29 January 2016 14: 47
    +1
    "Obama was advised to return an armored brigade to Europe for a permanent presence"

    It's time to advise Obama to find a suitable branch on a tree somewhere in the vicinity of the white house. I myself am not an evil person, and sometimes I feel sorry for Husseinich ... But, it’s necessary, barak, it’s necessary! yes
  18. lukke
    lukke 29 January 2016 15: 12
    +1
    After the beginning of the 90s, Americans, seeing a weak Russia, reduced their lot. Europeans have so much in liberty struck - redirected the loot from the defense for the benefit of the burghers. Russia came to its senses, carried out the modernization of its armed forces, repaired zealous in Chechnya, piled on rodents, helped in New Russia, returned the Crimea and? The Yankees are in shock! They now have nothing to oppose to them in Europe - the reverse process begins. Plus Europe's wiring for the purchase and maintenance of American soldiers and their equipment in the face of a threat from the East)
    and it works!
    1. 34 region
      34 region 29 January 2016 16: 16
      0
      Luke! 15.12/XNUMX. There, among other things, another action is being prepared. By intimidating Russia, they force Europeans to support the Amer’s defense industry. Which is against the backdrop of a civil recession. Pitting Europeans in BV created for Europeans a problem with refugees. Europe in the ring of phobias. Insidious Russia, insidious Islamists, insidious crisis! All hope for the Amer Batman! But this guy has his own interest.
  19. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 29 January 2016 15: 21
    0
    In Europe, 10 times more armored vehicles than ours. What do they miss? Or are they afraid that the Europeans will not press the button at a crucial moment?
  20. triglav
    triglav 29 January 2016 16: 17
    0
    If refugees continue to act in Europe as masters, troops will be needed ...
  21. Antropos
    Antropos 29 January 2016 17: 01
    +4
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/091/woze475.jpg
  22. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 29 January 2016 17: 08
    0
    Against migrants - a lot. It’s not enough against Russia.
  23. Nix1986
    Nix1986 29 January 2016 18: 22
    +1
    Anything can be advised to Obama, but first of all, their participation in Iraq and Afghanistan is still an open question, and if you listen to the latest news, it is planned to increase the contingent in Iraq to fight the igil and there may well be an additional contingent in Syria. And secondly, in addition to some ardent oaks, everyone understands that now it’s not the middle of the 70s and there will be no tank avalanche of the USSR before the lamb. Yes, and Obama is already approaching the term, it is not in his interests to take any harsh decisions now.
    1. flay
      flay 29 January 2016 22: 20
      +1
      Quote: Nix1986
      Yes, and Obama is already approaching the term, it is not in his interests to take any harsh decisions now.

      This is exactly the diametrically opposite situation. Obama has nothing to lose.
  24. Sergey333
    Sergey333 29 January 2016 20: 03
    +2
    One is not enough, better than 3 or 4, the Americans forgot that they are waging an economic war with us, and the maintenance of a huge number of tanks on a foreign continent costs a lot of money wink