Pentagon: American aircraft "was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe manner"

248
The US Department of Defense reported yesterday about the dangerous approach of the Russian fighter to the American reconnaissance aircraft, flying over the Black Sea, reports RIA News.



The incident, according to a spokesman for the ministry, Michel Baldans, occurred on Monday 25 in January.

“The US aircraft RC-135U, which made an ordinary flight in the international airspace over the Black Sea, was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner. We are studying this incident ",
she said.

“The Russian Su-27 flew near an American electronic intelligence aircraft, and then made a dangerous turn and went away. The distance was so close that as a result of the jolt from the jet fighter jet, the RC-135 lost controllability, ”the Washington Free Beacon said, citing a source.

According to the publication, "the incident occurred in 30 miles from the coast in international airspace and away from any Russian territory."

Recall that earlier the US and Russian military agreed mutual security measures during flights in Syria. At the same time, the Pentagon then noted that these measures concern only the situation in Syria and do not apply to other regions.
248 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +135
    29 January 2016 09: 03
    Trimmed what?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +205
        29 January 2016 09: 08
        The distance was so close that, as a result of a push from the fighter jet, the RC-135 lost control

        Excerpt from another publication:
        "" According to the American portal Washington Free Beacon, the Su-27 approached the RC-135U up to 20 feet - over 6 meters... The planes flew side by side for some time, then the Russian fighter made a sharp turn and went away. ""

        Six meters, not weak ... and highly professional.
        1. +27
          29 January 2016 09: 12
          Trimmed what?


          Now they are amendments to the LDPE with the inclusion of penalties for aggressive driving will begin to lobby)))
          1. +102
            29 January 2016 09: 22
            Again there was an occasion to announce new sanctions to Russia, in particular, to close all accounts of the pilot abroad and forbid him to issue a Schengen visa))
            1. +30
              29 January 2016 09: 51
              in particular, close all accounts of the pilot abroad and forbid him to issue a Schengen visa))

              ... with the seizure of all property located outside the Russian Federation.
              1. +56
                29 January 2016 10: 16
                from jet fighter jet

                Chuyka, that that jet was not from a fighter ..... laughing
                1. +26
                  29 January 2016 10: 41
                  "The incident occurred 30 miles offshore in international airspace and far from any Russian territory."


                  Even future ones?
                  1. +10
                    29 January 2016 18: 21
                    Quote: Rosich333
                    "The incident occurred 30 miles offshore in international airspace and far from any Russian territory."

                    And from which shore? Was it an hour from Crimea? Would you "cut" our Su-27 aircraft of theirs 30 miles from Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey?
                  2. +6
                    30 January 2016 11: 44
                    that is, partners in the interception of the Tu-95 can be dangerously close and maneuver anywhere they like, but the pilots of the Russian Air Force, no? partners afraid ??? somehow it’s undemocratic ... Viva Air Force !!!
              2. +8
                29 January 2016 11: 17
                How is he now without his villa in Miami?
            2. +18
              29 January 2016 16: 36
              Military pilots do not need a visa. Only the order of the commander.
            3. +4
              29 January 2016 22: 41
              The West has changed its sexual orientation, and this explains why it turned to us asshole.
          2. +20
            29 January 2016 10: 23
            Quote: gfs84
            Now they are amendments to the LDPE with the inclusion of penalties for aggressive driving will begin to lobby)))

            Russians actually love fast and extreme driving. laughing First, let this navel of the Earth determine where their interests are and let them first learn to fly in such extreme sports! soldier
          3. +4
            29 January 2016 13: 05
            Now they are amendments to the LDPE with the inclusion of penalties for aggressive driving will begin to lobby)))


            Yeah, pilots are deprived of their rights for six months for checkered flights fellow
          4. +22
            29 January 2016 13: 39
            Trimmed what?

            GIBDDshnikov had to be called ....?! These suckers are American, worse than a slutty girl, just screeching all over the world, help! rob, rape ..... !!! Immediately you can see the "great -" exclusively "" - A DEAD AND VILLAGE NATION !!!
            1. +6
              29 January 2016 14: 42
              Quote: Bone
              Immediately you can see the "great -" exclusively "" - A DEAD AND VILLAGE NATION !!!

              And I disagree. why vile nation? Most Americans are perfectly adequate. Another thing is that they were processed with propaganda, yes. The Americans have a different problem - they are run by a group of villains who do not care about the interests of the Americans themselves, in this regard they can be pitied, although they are to blame, no one imposed their "democracy" on them.
              1. +4
                30 January 2016 20: 37
                The German proletariat was also, they say, adequate and peace-loving. Only a bunch of villains, you know ...
                And the Ukrainians. And the Islamists. And ... and others too, in the shower, somewhere, people are good.
            2. +8
              29 January 2016 18: 35
              Quote: Bone
              The traffic police had to call ....?!

              And what does the traffic police have to do with it? There it’s time to call the scavengers ..., now you’ll wash the cabin for about three months ..
        2. +84
          29 January 2016 09: 41
          Quote: subbtin.725
          Six meters, not weak ... and highly professional.

          And most importantly: the American lost control, and Russian pilots are accused of unprofessionalism!
          1. +3
            29 January 2016 19: 47
            Quote: Tol100v
            Quote: subbtin.725
            Six meters, not weak ... and highly professional.

            And most importantly: the American lost control, and Russian pilots are accused of unprofessionalism!

            I remembered "Case in the square 36-80".
          2. +3
            30 January 2016 11: 08
            Quote: Tol100v
            And most importantly: the American lost control, and Russian pilots are accused of unprofessionalism!


            aha, as usual - again we hear: "A-ah! We again have someone shit in our pants!" It sounds exaggerated and stupid, of course, but conveys the essence for sure :)

            And to the pilot of the Su-27, THANKS! Well, honestly, it’s just lighter in my soul :)
        3. +21
          29 January 2016 10: 28
          Quote: subbtin.725
          Six meters, not weak ... and highly professional

          This is for us, for them professionally, it is not less than 2500 km (remember our teachings in the Astrakhan region, how they shouted "dangerously close and unprofessional !!")
          But ours will get SU35, probably the level of trolling will increase and I hope we will hear from the penguin: - "The Russians are very unprofessional .. they burned a hole in the console of our aircraft with their jet stream feel It’s not without reason that all sorts of new figures are being studied, the chakra is there wink
        4. +17
          29 January 2016 10: 45
          Quote: subbtin.725
          Six meters, not weak ... and highly professional.

          needless to say yes and
          Quote: note about our boy
          as a result of the fighter jet propulsion, the RC-135 lost control "

          only a professional could do thisbut not shkolota. Great they are shaking their asses. Probably such cases are not included in the list of insurance, that’s squealing.
          1. +7
            29 January 2016 12: 42
            EW must be used. Will fall due to electronics failure.
          2. +1
            29 January 2016 13: 17
            When will they learn to fly planes? Even up to category "B"?
            Pampers will always be put on a flight!
        5. +26
          29 January 2016 10: 56
          My Black (Russian) Sea Fly over the Atlantic if you can
        6. +10
          29 January 2016 13: 46
          Quote: subbtin.725
          Six meters, not weak ... and highly professional.

          our fingers showed who the boss is ...
          1. +11
            29 January 2016 18: 31
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            our fingers showed who the boss is ...

            Well yes... Yes , that's right ..., it’s somehow more reliable on the fingers, and does not require translation ...
        7. +2
          29 January 2016 17: 34
          For some time the planes flew side by side, then the Russian fighter made a sharp turn and went to the side.

          ours tried to train "partners" for a joint flight at the Parade, then when they simultaneously weakened (which is why there was a push) rushed away! feel
        8. +16
          29 January 2016 20: 41
          Interestingly, there is much more than 6 meters? but ours did not complain ....
          1. PKK
            0
            31 January 2016 09: 32
            Well, not really! And if it would have torn off anything from the Americanos with a jet? Could they show a present?
        9. +3
          29 January 2016 23: 52
          But the Americans are awake lads .. It turns out that they are awake .... Let them be afraid! And they will tell everyone how scary to climb RUSSIAN !!!!
      2. +63
        29 January 2016 09: 18
        Here again their word is against our word. Given that any contact with the Yankees is interpreted by them in a negative way, and their media draws this up as another fake, you should not pay special attention to the screams of US officials.
        Thanks to our pilot good , and the staff for rehabilitation after a nervous shock. Yes
        1. +14
          29 January 2016 10: 20
          Quote: zanoza
          Here again their word is against our word. Given that any contact with the Yankees is interpreted by them in a negative way, and their media draws this up as another fake, you should not pay special attention to the screams of US officials.
          Thanks to our pilot good , and the staff for rehabilitation after a nervous shock. Yes

          I will support.
          And I think that it's high time for ours to adopt the practice of presenting news from "our partners" ...
          In the modern world, for some reason, it’s not the one who has the evidence that is right, but the one who started yelling earlier ...
          1. +2
            29 January 2016 12: 14
            Like at the police station !!!
          2. 0
            29 January 2016 23: 54
            Purely Jewish reception .. Oh wei, ah Wei!
        2. 0
          29 January 2016 11: 20
          And wash!
        3. +1
          29 January 2016 11: 34
          and Shtatovsky’s rehabilitation after a nervous shock.

          ... but first a long-term cure for bear disease! drinks
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +5
            29 January 2016 15: 45
            Well, I would not worry about the US crew. So that on arrival at the base their water is turned off, let them walk longer with traces of training. And our young fellow, I wonder what the "partners" would yell if the scout gurgled? Hello to the person from OMSDON drinks
      3. +27
        29 January 2016 09: 30
        And there is nothing for American radar reconnaissance aircraft to do in the Black Sea, they fly in the Caribbean ...
        It's good that the "khibiny" was not used, so that the electronics would all die
        1. +27
          29 January 2016 09: 40
          Quote: mishaia_23
          It's good that the "khibiny" was not used, so that the electronics would all die

          And for some reason I thought: "It's a pity that the khibiny was not used." request
          1. +13
            29 January 2016 10: 07
            Quote: Misha Honest
            And for some reason I thought: "It's a pity that the khibiny was not used."

            Duc at such a distance it was possible to swat with a reptile from PMa, recklessly spread ears here laughing well, or at least show the ass, but in general all our interceptions are not professional and entail threats to poor specks crying
          2. +7
            29 January 2016 13: 10
            Quote: Misha Honest
            "It's a pity that the khibiny was not used"

            - so he flew there to "sniff" what the air smelled like, including with the included electronic warfare means. Without a special reason, you should not disclose all the properties of the available means of protection, especially if you can simply scare with the roar of the engine and the jet stream.
            1. 0
              29 January 2016 13: 43
              Quote: Kite
              - so he flew there to "sniff" what the air smelled like, including with the included electronic warfare means. Without a special reason, you should not disclose all the properties of the available means of protection, especially if you can simply scare with the roar of the engine and the jet stream.

              So that's just the trick to knock out this airplane as well as "Cook". And send him to the bottom of the Black Sea - to arrange hugs with dolphins. And then let the Yankees prove that he did not fall himself ...
              1. +8
                29 January 2016 14: 52
                smile
                Quote: Misha Honest
                So that's the joke,

                - that in the depths of the Black Sea the water is saturated with hydrogen sulfide, dolphins do not live there
                - that electronic warfare equipment can distort the radar picture, but irradiation that disables all electronics is not a warning, but an attack.
                - to scream "hurray", it is enough to have a throat; to win, you have to be strong and smart. tongue
                - the Yankees will not prove, they all willingly believe them, no matter what nonsense they carry.
                The discussed "news" from that series.
        2. +28
          29 January 2016 10: 00
          ..... And there’s nothing for American radar reconnaissance aircraft to do in the Black Sea ...

          ... They obviously don’t know that the sea used to be called RUSSIAN !!!! .... Let them draw conclusions ... lol
      4. +12
        29 January 2016 10: 01
        Quote: fox21h
        p_endozy have piled full diapers?

        Because of the laid bricks, their alignment was broken. lol
      5. +3
        29 January 2016 12: 22
        Our people love to show their tummy with rackets goodbye, but the Americans at this moment always worry very much ...
    2. +56
      29 January 2016 09: 10
      Where is the USA and where is the Black Sea?
      Nothing to do, trample the floor ... i.e. Our sky is smoked.
      1. +39
        29 January 2016 09: 44
        They didn’t dig for his trouble, so that everything would fly over him ...
        1. +8
          29 January 2016 10: 25
          Maladtsa))))) patstalom)))
    3. +40
      29 January 2016 09: 17
      And do not hell to fly where it is not necessary.
      Recall that earlier the US and Russian military agreed mutual security measures during flights in Syria. At the same time, the Pentagon then noted that these measures concern only the situation in Syria and do not apply to other regions.

      So they themselves answered the hoopoe’s question.
      1. +26
        29 January 2016 09: 33
        According to the publication, "the incident occurred in 30 miles from the coast in international airspace and away from any Russian territory."

        Far from Russian, speak? And where is American territory located?
        1. +2
          30 January 2016 08: 47
          Quote: Maxsh
          And where is American territory located?


          They believe that everywhere. But we are not interested in their opinion.
          But they won’t understand this. By Zadornov- stupid, HOWEVER !!!
    4. +24
      29 January 2016 09: 33
      They become smaller, smaller !!!
      Something tells me that in Soviet times, such maneuvers, on both sides, happened orders of magnitude more often than in our time! Nobody yelled about it, with wet pants!
      Then the professionals worked for our opponent, and now ... even sad !!! sad
      1. +6
        29 January 2016 09: 37
        I remembered the film "Case in the square 36-80" fragment with refueling. True, there the roles were distributed differently
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk2eJZUInfk
        1. +5
          29 January 2016 09: 43
          This movie. The reality was somewhat different. And ours flew like that always. There was only a pause in the 90s.
    5. +15
      29 January 2016 09: 38
      Yeah, the bumper was scratched. And hid before the arrival of the traffic police.
      1. +11
        29 January 2016 10: 28
        Quote: abrakadabre
        Yeah, the bumper was scratched. And hid before the arrival of the traffic police.


        Where is the traffic police from there, the DAI is closer, but they did not have time to the place of the accident (more precisely, the VTP) due to the fact that they have "litak zlamavsya and there is no rich kerosene!"
      2. +28
        29 January 2016 11: 58
        Quote: abrakadabre
        Yeah, the bumper was scratched. And hid before the arrival of the traffic police.
    6. +18
      29 January 2016 09: 45
      was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner.

      Professional and safe interception, this is when our interceptor already covers the turbines at the base, while burning fragments still fall from the sky. And this is just a polite hint of an unwanted presence.
      It would have been unprofessional if it had happened the other way around or no one had flown up a hint.
    7. +9
      29 January 2016 10: 01
      Nothing to do to the amers over the Black Sea ...
      1. -9
        29 January 2016 15: 31
        Quote: Jan Krumins
        Nothing to do to the amers over the Black Sea ...

        Everyone is so brave and witty. And if the answer is a mirror? Ours recently in the Atlantic and the English Channel. Also far from our borders Someone will shake so turbine. God forbid disaster will be
        1. +10
          29 January 2016 20: 08
          Quote: DoctorOleg
          Everyone is so brave and witty. And if the answer is a mirror? Ours recently in the Atlantic and the English Channel. Also far from our borders Someone will shake so turbine. God forbid disaster will be

          The Atlantic and the English Channel are international. The Black Sea is internal. Let the ships and planes of those countries, whose shores it washes, go there. This is the time. Earlier, there was an unspoken agreement - the Black Sea, the sphere of interests of Russia (USSR) .Its INNER sea. Recently, the "partners" are reminded of this quite transparently. Amers have nothing to do there. That's two. Next. Words about "... unsafe and unprofessional manner ...", nothing more than ... . words. Ours work in the Atlantic on alert. Americans, in the Black Sea, for the purpose of intelligence and espionage (underline the necessary). To touch a spy and not let him poke his nose into other things is a good thing. For not ...
        2. +1
          29 January 2016 22: 20
          Well, then you’ll have to once again mislead, over Donald Cook, with the Khibiny! Oh, by the way, have you already got a new crew there?
    8. +12
      29 January 2016 10: 05
      A strange statement, he didn’t intercept him over the Gulf of Mexico, but the Russian TB rules are in force over the Black Sea.
      1. 0
        29 January 2016 12: 33
        EW must be used to fall from the failure of electronics.
    9. +11
      29 January 2016 10: 06
      I had to overtake and get out with a bat
      1. +14
        29 January 2016 10: 24
        ..................... Again, these evil Russians ............
        1. +14
          29 January 2016 10: 31
          ......................
          1. +5
            29 January 2016 22: 47
            I counted - SIX times in a row they reproduced a computer simulation of the "atrocity" of our Sushka, who dared to scare the glorious American pilots. They themselves are not disgusted with so primitive man in the street to put pressure on the brains? Therefore, they are afraid of the RT channel - everything is there with imagination, with a twinkle, no one obsessive repetition, so that the dull average American finally reaches, does not engage.
      2. +6
        29 January 2016 12: 09
        It was necessary to overtake and attach to the front. At the same mentioned distance of 6 m. For the pilots to admire how beautifully the turbine of our engine glows from the inside.
    10. +26
      29 January 2016 10: 20
      Quote: Velizariy
      Trimmed what?

      I’m looking at Russia 24, there the Amur (tiger) patted Timur (the goat) for scruff, for annoyance, doesn’t it remind you of anything? laughing
    11. +5
      29 January 2016 10: 29
      Six meters, flying, six meters! These irresponsible Russian dumbasses! And yes, the boss forgot the diapers again!
    12. 0
      29 January 2016 10: 36
      it's good that the RC-135 did not crash) recourse
      1. +1
        29 January 2016 22: 25
        It’s a pity that it didn’t collapse! No ov - no problem!
    13. The comment was deleted.
    14. The comment was deleted.
    15. +2
      29 January 2016 13: 00
      In a normal flight, you need to wear ordinary diapers and not bother your boss with a head obos .... pants.
    16. +9
      29 January 2016 13: 01
      “The incident occurred 30 miles offshore in international airspace and far from ANY Russian territory”

      Pleased with this quote :)))
    17. +5
      29 January 2016 14: 01
      Quote: Velizariy
      Trimmed what?

      ----------------------
      This crap is ancient as the skin of a mammoth, even when I served in the air defense of 1988, constantly 4 of these things and 2 SR-71 Black Bird patrolled at our borders. If it were my will, I would kill these radio scouts.
    18. 0
      29 January 2016 15: 26
      Yeah, and the emergency gang blinked ..
    19. The comment was deleted.
    20. +1
      29 January 2016 16: 39
      The Americans, apparently, did not have compulsory motor third-party liability insurance, that’s how they got it)))), and the Chinese DVR, the cigarette lighter burned and did not work.
    21. +3
      29 January 2016 17: 52
      Quote: Velizariy
      Trimmed what?

      No, I just hinted thickly and correctly that they weren’t welcome here.
    22. +5
      29 January 2016 18: 57
      Yes, yes! Clipped!
      Here it is:
      МUS defense said yesterday about the dangerous approach of a Russian fighter to an American reconnaissance aircraft flying over the Black Sea
      , we can only answer this way: - And fly fuck where you fly fly !!! am
    23. +3
      29 January 2016 22: 11
      There is no evidence, the traffic police did not call, the evrotrotokol did not make.
    24. 0
      30 January 2016 03: 43
      He also showed a fist!
    25. +1
      1 February 2016 00: 23
      Quote: Velizariy
      Trimmed what?


      At the traffic light, I stamped it out. Touches about the "unprofessional manner." Rights purchased, 100 poods. And only the highest skill of American pilots ... God save America from them.
  2. +18
    29 January 2016 09: 04
    All! American pilots sent for 3 years, for rehabilitation! laughing
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 09: 16
      NOT, on dismissal, as they are not used to aggressive treatment ... laughing
    2. +2
      29 January 2016 09: 27
      Quote: prabiz
      All! American pilots sent for 3 years, for rehabilitation! laughing

      And the whole form was sent to dry cleaning), and the plane to the sink)
      1. +2
        29 January 2016 09: 45
        Quote: ramzes1776
        and the plane to the sink)

        Washing is problematic. Do not wash.
        1. +2
          29 January 2016 15: 21
          Dries and falls off itself wassat
        2. +1
          29 January 2016 15: 21
          Then it will be washed, but the smell will remain. So, only in re-melting =)
          1. 0
            1 February 2016 02: 25
            Quote: GODRICHNIK 1
            Then it will be washed, but the smell will remain. So, only in re-melting =)


            Why remelt something? Buy at residual value, disinfect, brew hatches and on a pedestal. Mi-26 drag on the suspension. But in Russia there is a monument to Cucumber, a monument to Sanya Yamshchikovsky, and this will be a monument to Drischi.
  3. +33
    29 January 2016 09: 06
    Pentagon: American aircraft "was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe manner"
    Apparently, they determine the danger and safety of the maneuver by the state of the American ace's pants and the smell from the cab laughing .... well, I can’t seriously comment on this request
  4. +15
    29 January 2016 09: 07
    Do not hell to fly where it is not necessary.
    1. +6
      29 January 2016 09: 45
      Quote: chauffeur
      Do not hell to fly where it is not necessary.


      He took off his tongue, it's not California.
  5. +9
    29 January 2016 09: 08
    In my opinion, quite professionally "cut"
  6. +7
    29 January 2016 09: 08
    "The distance was so small that as a result of the air jolt, the pilot flew off the jolt" - the whole plane was fucked up!
  7. +17
    29 January 2016 09: 09
    And mattresses should teach history. In the old days the Black Sea was called the Russian Sea! And thirty kilometers from which coast did he fly? From Turkish? Or they can’t understand that Crimea is Russia?
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 09: 51
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And thirty kilometers from which coast did he fly?

      30 miles, that's about 50 km
    2. +2
      29 January 2016 12: 29
      It is a pity that the electronic warfare was not turned on, would have fallen from the failure of the electronics.
      1. +1
        29 January 2016 14: 34
        Quote: cergey51046
        It’s a pity that EW did not turn on

        C'mon, are our animals flying, or what?
  8. +5
    29 January 2016 09: 09
    And there is nothing to fly in the reach of our aircraft)))
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 10: 26
      That's right, you can't fly at all. For if need be we will reach everywhere wink
  9. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 09
    The distance was so close that as a result of the push from a jet stream the RC-135’s fighter has lost control, ”says the Washington Free Beacon, citing a source.

    "Observed"shit! lol Stand = be afraid! angry
  10. +20
    29 January 2016 09: 11
    United States, we fly, we mean, we are peacefully spying on us, when suddenly, behind us, how to sneak up and how it starts to creep, it has ceased to violate the double continuous ...
    1. +6
      29 January 2016 09: 16
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      Usa, we mean peacefully

      Here you need to add the main road laughing
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      when suddenly behind the su27 how to sneak up yes how it starts to creep, it ceased to break the double continuous ...

      Speeding, drunk laughing
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      peacefully spying on ourselves

      We do not spy, but protect democracy laughing
    2. +8
      29 January 2016 10: 29
      Yeah, I almost flew into the ditch lol
  11. +41
    29 January 2016 09: 12
    This Pentagon has not yet encountered drivers of our minibuses!)
  12. +23
    29 January 2016 09: 14
    This is such a terrible Russian pilot that does not allow Americans to quietly spy on Russia, but how dare he laughing What do their fighters themselves lift to intercept the Russian Tu-95?
    1. +19
      29 January 2016 09: 48
      Quote: 0255
      to intercept Russian Tu-95

      Nonsense. This Tu-95 is intercepting an American!
      1. +5
        29 January 2016 11: 08
        Quote: Petrix
        Quote: 0255
        to intercept Russian Tu-95

        Nonsense. This Tu-95 is intercepting an American!

        ... and also mocks the Raptor pilot with the sound of his engines laughing
        1. +2
          29 January 2016 15: 52
          Quote: 0255
          ... and also mocks the Raptor pilot with the sound of his engines

          And it’s even scary to think what will happen to the raptor if the bear makes a dangerous turn and blows on it laughing
    2. +1
      29 January 2016 12: 25
      EW must be turned on so that they fall from electronics failure.
  13. +21
    29 January 2016 09: 16
    The loss of controllability here at such a crocodile ... did a little tremble, but they had already done it in their pants)))
    1. 0
      29 January 2016 12: 23
      EW must be turned on so that they fall from electronics failure.
  14. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 19
    I wonder why the RC-135U front air intake like the F-16?
    1. +8
      29 January 2016 09: 45
      Quote: Athenogen
      I wonder why the RC-135U front air intake like the F-16?

      This is not an air intake, but most likely intelligence equipment bully
      1. +1
        29 January 2016 10: 22
        Quote: 0255
        This is not an air intake, but most likely intelligence equipment


        He has intelligence equipment on his side (it looks like a radar), an air intake in front, but for what? The engines on his wings. (the picture is clickable)
        1. +4
          29 January 2016 12: 29
          Quote: Athenogen
          He has intelligence equipment on his side (it looks like a radar), an air intake in front, but for what? The engines on his wings. (the picture is clickable)

          http://www.airwar.ru/enc/spy/rc135u.html
        2. +1
          29 January 2016 13: 24
          the nose cone was noticeably enlarged and rounded,
          this is to the question, what kind of meatball is under his nose.
      2. +8
        29 January 2016 10: 32
        If to apply ship terminology, ento will turn out ... GALYUN
    2. +5
      29 January 2016 09: 49
      They dried diapers in it. smile
      1. +8
        29 January 2016 10: 37
        Quote: tommy717
        They dried diapers in it. smile

        Are you still tired of writing about diapers? Something a lot of comments about them on one article.
    3. +2
      29 January 2016 10: 29
      This is to provide additional ventilation. After the maneuvers of our interceptors in their cabin, the atmosphere becomes unbearable. And with such a sucker it is ventilated faster ...
    4. +1
      29 January 2016 11: 43
      Air so that after the passage of the Su-27.
    5. 0
      29 January 2016 13: 08
      Of course, to ventilate the cabin ....
  15. +6
    29 January 2016 09: 19
    Let them say thanks that they didn’t get the fuck down - now it’s kind of like, judging by the Turks! ..
    1. +10
      29 January 2016 09: 31
      Based on their "truth", we should have quietly let the spyen near the border and shoot him down, so that in our territories. the waters fell. And then declare that we issued him a warning 30 times. Well, whose problem is it that the American does not understand Russian obscene?
  16. +4
    29 January 2016 09: 20
    Let them fly to the Caribbean. There is nothing to stare at our territory. smile
  17. +7
    29 January 2016 09: 22
    RC-135 has lost control

    I hooked a normal "duck" smile
  18. +3
    29 January 2016 09: 22
    Here damn it again, because only the pants are dry))
  19. +2
    29 January 2016 09: 25
    and nefig fly here
  20. +2
    29 January 2016 09: 26
    These mattresses are taking revenge on us for having a hydrograph in Cuba.
  21. +4
    29 January 2016 09: 27
    in an unsafe and unprofessional manner

    This is in their understanding. For our pilots, this is a common thing, though ... even if you just flew by, it would still be something, but they would blather.
  22. +5
    29 January 2016 09: 27
    Cropped СЂР ° Р · РІРµРґС ‹РІР ° тел СЊРЅС ‹Р№ A plane, not a civilian, is handsome. There is nothing for the reconnaissance aircraft to dodge at our borders.
  23. HAM
    +4
    29 January 2016 09: 29
    Smiled, judging by the Yanker films, there are very cool guys serving there, and after the flight of the SU, they got "Faberge" cool - hot coffee was spilled on their pants ... They would now "PROFESSIONALLY" wash away.
  24. +4
    29 January 2016 09: 30
    “The US aircraft RC-135U was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner.

    The distance was so close that, as a result of the push from the fighter jet, the RC-135 lost control "
    - Well, where is the lack of professionalism ??? laughing
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 09: 44
      And the fact that they forgot to inject some kind of smoke mixture into the afterburner so that not only controllability, but also visibility is lost.
  25. +7
    29 January 2016 09: 30
    I applaud standing for our professionals, again the pants are soaked exceptional laughing
  26. +4
    29 January 2016 09: 31
    Pentagon: American aircraft "was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe manner"


    With amers the only thing to do.
  27. +7
    29 January 2016 09: 32
    If there had been something, then on Monday, screams and squeals with saliva would have crept everywhere. And so ... The usual working situation. This is not Hollywood tales for you, but flights in Russian.
  28. +6
    29 January 2016 09: 34
    according to amers-is it safe maneuvers when the plane flies nearby quietly and scatters pink petals? "Morons, bl ..." (c) (S. Lavrov) .. laughing
  29. +10
    29 January 2016 09: 35
    Quote: 0255
    This is such a terrible Russian pilot that does not allow Americans to quietly spy on Russia, but how dare he laughing What do their fighters themselves lift to intercept the Russian Tu-95?

    And also advise them to remember 1977, spring, Cape Crillon, the head of the PN Major Ustinov Yu gave the command to attack the American RS-135, one missile was launched, passed the target, and the second ran out of fuel, then the Americans went into their pants not that imposed, imposed. The incident was "hushed up", the navigator is to blame for the fact that the plane was about 10 km above our territory, in the area of ​​the rock "Danger Stone".
    1. +3
      29 January 2016 10: 50
      Let us better remember the 1950s - the beginning of the 1960s, when Soviet fighters shot down their scouts soldier Then the reconnaissance flight could end for their crew extremely deplorably. And then the Su-27 flew nearby, and they are unhappy
  30. +6
    29 January 2016 09: 35
    The Black Sea is not a place for walking RC-135U, here our people walk.
    And in general, more
    Al-Masoudi, an Iraqi, Arabian historian, geographer and traveler wrote in 943 On the Black Sea: “SEA OF RUS, ON WHICH OTHER TRIBES DO NOT SWIM, AND THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN ON ONE OF ITS SHORES. ”

    And our pilot (in my opinion) quite professionally hit "this tourist" with a jet stream.
    1. +1
      29 January 2016 09: 45
      Frontal smoky / toned exhaust.
  31. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 38
    In the good news in the morning)))))
  32. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 38
    Do not fly where it is not necessary, let them circle along their coast. Americans completely lost fear
  33. 0
    29 January 2016 09: 42
    as a result of the fighter jet propulsion, the RC-135 lost control "
    The loss of control is the result of the unprofessionalism of the pilots of this RC. This is another reason for them to quit. And our pilot is super ass. It is unfortunate that the American did not fall.
  34. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 43
    Fucking whiners - "again these terrible Russians flew very close with us ....." laughing
  35. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      29 January 2016 09: 51
      In an unsafe manner, it would be like opening a warning fire from a cannon and scratching the cockpit with a teal.
  36. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 46
    And not why fly on "scouts", then no one will intercept. As always, the Americans put it in their pants. laughing
  37. +1
    29 January 2016 09: 48
    I don't know, I didn't hold a candle! There is a proposal to design "parking sensors for aircraft" ... And then LGBT values)))
    Sued for "Sexual Harassment" !! They don't care, but the pilot has a medical examination laughing
  38. 0
    29 January 2016 09: 48
    was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner. We are studying this incident. ”

    And the (professional) pilot of the SGA professionally lost control and used the diapers even more professionally, and FSUs and ...
  39. +7
    29 January 2016 09: 49
    "US aircraft RC-135U, making a normal flight ....
    As it is in the Air Force, and even intelligence can be "normal" flight. Reconnaissance flights have never been a routine, and after someone took the F-16 in the back, there will be no quiet flights near the Russian borders. This is what politicians make statements, and the flight crew knows that everything will have to be paid for.
  40. +5
    29 January 2016 09: 51
    What are they scouting there for? We don’t fly over the Gulf of Mexico, because they wouldn’t have been too alienated there ... and how can a professional act unprofessionally))))) ??? A fighter is by definition a professional!
  41. 0
    29 January 2016 09: 52
    Unprofessional in the mattress - this is when they climb to peep and eavesdrop in someone else's house, and they threatened to lather their neck. Let them swallow. In Russia, their rudeness does not pass!
  42. +3
    29 January 2016 09: 53
    And what the hell ... Amerikos was doing on the Black Sea! It's the same as a homeless man spoiling you in your entrance and dash for you to declare that you stopped him.
    1. -2
      29 January 2016 10: 28
      And the sea, as it were, is common. It is impossible to prohibit flights over neutral waters.
      Your cap.
      1. +1
        29 January 2016 12: 53
        And who argues, but didn’t manage to dodge, don’t get confused under his feet.
      2. 0
        30 January 2016 20: 30
        Quote: EvilLion
        And the sea, as it were, is common. It is impossible to prohibit flights over neutral waters.
        Your cap.


        and it’s all the more impossible to forbid us to fly over the Black Sea, if you have spies, don’t be surprised that you are being driven with pissed rags ...

        Quote: EvilLion
        And who argues, but didn’t manage to dodge, don’t get confused under his feet.
  43. +4
    29 January 2016 09: 53
    All right. Americans, sitting at the helm should be insecure - and whether they will return back to base after flying near Russian territory.
  44. +3
    29 January 2016 09: 54
    Amerikosy completely pampered! For a long time no one trained their ass!
  45. +3
    29 January 2016 09: 56
    And how did you like to fly over our sea and not be afraid. This does not happen. Say thanks, they didn’t turn on EW, they would collect shells at the bottom.
  46. +10
    29 January 2016 09: 57
    In the 60s and 70s, this was all too often, on both sides, including the "dive" on aircraft carriers. There were losses. So on 25.05.1968/16/XNUMX, KAE Tu-XNUMX, Lieutenant Colonel Pliev A.Z. in the Norwegian Sea, at
    "psychological visits" and photography on an American aircraft carrier, carried away and when turning, caught the water with a wing.
    In 1972 Lt. Col. Sveridov, cut the keel of the F-16. These are just two episodes. After long negotiations
    USA and USSR, minimum intervals were established for such maneuvers. No USSR, no intervals.
    So far, we have agreed only on Syria.
  47. 0
    29 January 2016 09: 59
    Is there any sense in showing how much the Amer pilots managed, or yes, most likely it is an attempt to present and recover for the star-striped underpants in the form of washing powder, soap ...? lol
    1. 0
      29 January 2016 12: 48
      Exactly, they are envious of ssy.kuny Putin, they decided to dilute the detergent.
  48. +5
    29 January 2016 10: 00
    I was looking for Putin's yacht, but it was cut off. In a rough way. It's time for the BBC to make another film. I give the name for free. "Brave American Pilots in the Paws of the Russian Bear".
  49. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 02
    Americans, as always, play in public, pissed off! Everywhere you can play along, They will play along as long as they were not to blame. Or even to prove that they are right, but you are not.
  50. 0
    29 January 2016 10: 08
    Again, the Americans have full pants. And do not hell with your lousy nose poke where you should not!
  51. 0
    29 January 2016 10: 10
    The good news is that for a couple of days you have an elevated mood and no need for Red Bulls.
  52. +3
    29 January 2016 10: 13
    It’s hard for these bastards to play such games with our pilots. They forgot how in the seventies our border boat ran into their ship with the anchors released to the fullest extent. These overly insolent Yankees then demolished all the ship’s settings and tore apart the entire side. For many months then this advanced American ship lay in the dock for repairs.
    My only regret is that with this case we are supporting their economy.
    The factories producing diapers (diapers for adults) are probably now filled to capacity with orders. And from the sailors. And from the pilots.
    ... and the pilot got out of the plane. And the smell from him was so Russian.
    Steamed turnips...
    But they are not used to sitting in a *ram. They didn’t even have latrines on the first spacecraft. We wore diapers under ourselves. Beauty. Yes, real gourmets recover right in the closed system of the spacesuit. Into the lungs. And the hard one.
    And VVP, as usual, will comment: “So, they themselves have acted up in a mischief…”)
  53. +2
    29 January 2016 10: 27
    And if you remember the first pictures of the Su-27 from a NATO aircraft? Then there seemed to be an "Orion" and he tried to shake off the "drying" by reducing the speed to a stall, but it didn't work out, because the "drying" had an even lower speed than the propeller-driven "Orion", but a collision occurred, although both are back.

    According to the recollections of our strategists, NATO interceptors almost climbed into the propellers, so it was really scary to fly, if something happened, “they will be saved, but what about us?”
    1. +7
      29 January 2016 10: 59
      Quote: EvilLion
      And if you remember the first pictures of the Su-27 from a NATO aircraft? Then there seemed to be an "Orion" and he tried to shake off the "drying" by reducing the speed to a stall, but it didn't work out, because the "drying" had an even lower speed than the propeller-driven "Orion", but a collision occurred, although both are back.

      According to the recollections of our strategists, NATO interceptors almost climbed into the propellers, so it was really scary to fly, if something happened, “they will be saved, but what about us?”


      If you are talking about an incident in the Barents Sea involving a Su-27 and an Orion, then as an eyewitness to the event I can tell you in detail.
      "Orion" from the Tromsø base came to our borders every day in the summer. From about 5-6 in the morning until late in the evening. And he hung around the border back and forth. Previously, they didn’t pay much attention to him, they didn’t even announce readiness No. 1, but after Rust they gave the command to accompany all the adversaries with our fighters.
      "Orion" can hang in the air for 10-12 hours, and our people accompany it. They walk side by side and get on his nerves. Ours runs out of fuel - he goes to base, another one takes off and everything goes in a circle.
      We had a combined command post with aviation and anti-aircraft missile forces, and a navigator from our type of command post was on hand. He does not control our pilot, but he sees and hears everything.
      Orion's speed is about 400-420 km/h, ours hangs out nearby.
      Everyone is already tired of following this Orion every day, and so our pilot says:
      - Damn... How is this "Orion" already stuck...
      Navigator:
      - Pour kerosene on him...
      - Now!
      He comes in from above the Orion, slightly overtakes it and dumps some kerosene on it.
      The Orion pilot apparently lost his mind or something, but the Orion jerked upward and pierced the belly of our plane with its propellers. Orion's 2 engines stopped working, the speed dropped to 200 km/h and it trudged straight ahead to Norway.
      Ours returned to base, the damage was not very serious.
      The command decided that if the pilot was punished, then our people would be afraid of them. Therefore, the pilot did not suffer any punishment. They were not rewarded, but they were not punished either.
      I once watched a documentary that described this episode. The official version differs from reality. As usual. They said it was an accident.
      And this pilot died some time later in another flight accident. May his memory be blessed.
      1. 0
        29 January 2016 11: 57
        Thanks for the interesting info!
      2. +4
        29 January 2016 13: 42
        [img]http://militaryrussia.ru/forum/download/file.php?id=26071&t=1&sid=ca9fd1c18


        4a44a3401b61d95f59a89d3[/img]
        Quote: 1rl141
        Navigator:

        The Su-27 Orion took off from Andøya Air Station in Norway and moved to the area where our submarines were practicing combat missions. While patrolling along the border over the waters of the Barents Sea, a Norwegian patrol aircraft began placing sonar buoys and conducting reconnaissance of submarines. To control the actions of the Orion, as usual, the operational duty officers of the North Sea Air Defense Corps were given the command to take the fighter into the air. A Su-27, no. 36, took off from the duty flight of the 941st IAP of the 10th Air Defense AR (Kilp-Yavr airfield, Murmansk region). The plane was piloted by Senior Lieutenant Vasily Tsimbal.

        The Norwegian patrol plane could hang in the air at the border for a very long time, and in order to get rid of it more quickly, Cymbal began to exhaust it. Several times he made approaches to the Orion, twisted aerobatics around him, stood in front of him in order to knock the jet off course. “Orion” tried to “shake off” the neighbor, reducing speed, but even at its minimum speed, the Su-27 stayed close. As a result, during the next maneuver, the Su-27 hit the rotor of the engine of the right console of the Orion wing with its keel. The screw broke, and the Norwegian had to go to base. (It is often mentioned that, in addition to everything, Tsimbal went in front of the Orion and poured him fuel directly on the cockpit glazing and the fuselage). Since there was no longer a patrol plane in the sky, after Tsimbal’s report that the Orion had left, he was given permission from the CP to return to the airfield.
        1. 0
          30 January 2016 19: 00
          I base my story on what happened at our checkpoint and on what our navigator and we heard partially. Therefore, I do not claim 100% truth in the details of what is happening. We couldn’t know these details. Our navigator said about the “broken belly,” he, of course, could have been mistaken, and so could I with him. These were probably his emotions.
          But they heard the joke of the navigator from Kilp-Yavr, “pour kerosene on him.”
          And I am confident in the speed and route of both planes. Because at that moment there was an ODKP.
          I can’t say how our Su-27 was spinning around the Orion. Only the pilot could say that. We saw the merging of marks from two targets, which was a prerequisite for the flight arrival. No radar will distinguish between 2 aircraft flying at a distance of 5-10 meters from each other.
          As for the fact that Orion wanted to “dump” the Su-27 by reducing its speed, I seriously doubt it. This is rather the official version.
          Orion always traveled at a speed of about 400 km per hour. Or it could have been less. Sometimes it was reduced to 320-350. And the damned bourgeoisie knew very well that the minimum speed of the Su-27 is about 200 km per hour. And the Orion will not be able to “reset” the drying by reducing the speed.
          The Orion's task is indeed to drop the sonar buoy and circle around it.
          Once, on the island of Kildin, we managed to capture a similar enemy buoy. It was simply thrown ashore. It was conscientiously gutted and its insides were studied.
          1. 0
            30 January 2016 19: 56
            Even before this incident with Orion, there was an incident involving a Su-27 and a pair of F-16s.
            One day, our weather reconnaissance aircraft flew to the Barents Sea area, if I’m not mistaken, a MiG-25. And in neutral waters, 2 F-16s attached themselves to it, “pinched” it and began to drag it north. There’s no way the MiG could get rid of them, already the fuel runs out, the F-16 abandons him and he has nothing left to do but return to base with the remaining fuel.
            NATO members have dealt with this kind of garbage more than once.
            And then our North was equipped with the Su-27.
            Naturally, NATO members were interested in this aircraft. And when the Su-27 took off for weather reconnaissance, F-16s appeared in the sky.
            According to the old proven method, they “clamp” it into a “box” and begin to drag it away from the shore. The Su-27, as it were, “presses on the brakes” and the F-16 rushes forward, he “sits on their tail” and fucked them both.
            The F-16s turn around, one to the left, the other to the right, and again try to squeeze ours in a vice. He again “slows on the brakes” and is again on their tail. Fucked both of them.
            This picture is repeated several times and each time we are on their tail.
            Apparently ours got tired of playing with them and he went into a sharp climb. They, naturally, followed him. Somewhere up to 14 meters they still stayed behind ours, and then
            began to lag behind. Ours reached 18000 meters and calmly left them.
            So the damned bourgeoisie was aware of the minimum speed of the Su-27.
            The Su-27 can “fit” into a square of 200 by 200 meters.
            1. +1
              30 January 2016 21: 53
              Quote: 1rl141
              Even before this incident with Orion, there was an incident involving a Su-27 and a pair of F-16s.

              So....
              Quote: 1rl141
              One day, our weather reconnaissance aircraft flew into the Barents Sea area, if I’m not mistaken, a MiG-25.

              So you will decide on the type of aircraft. Moreover, weather reconnaissance is carried out in the airfield area.
              1. 0
                31 January 2016 01: 32
                I told about the Mig-25 to make it clearer what the NATO F-16s were doing. Just read to the end.
                And weather scouts flew over the Barents Sea. And in the Kildin area and in the Rybachy area. And further. Maybe they weren’t reconnaissing the weather there, but if the OD of a higher command post tells me that this is a weather reconnaissance, then it is so. I personally did not ask the pilot what he was doing there.
                What is the radius of the airfield area? Is this the airfield area 100 km away? It’s 70 kilometers from Kildin to Kilp-Yavr. And even less from Severomorsk.
                So no need to grab my tongue.
  54. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 30
    Let me rephrase: whoever comes to us on a scout will crawl away with wet pants.
  55. +2
    29 January 2016 10: 32
    If this is not a fake, then everything is correct, a strong reflex is already developed: if the Russians are in the sky, then the pants are wet and not even very clean.
  56. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 34
    After 24 hours this morning this is news! I didn't want to sleep anymore. To our pilots - RESPECT AND HONOR!!!
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 44
    I wonder why all the Russian news resources quote the opinion of some clerk from the US Department of Defense? Me too, they found the ultimate truth. It looks absolutely purple to me. I live in Russia. But what does the Russian Defense Ministry think about this?
  59. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 49
    May they not have smooth flights. -Not at home.
  60. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 51
    (The incident, according to department spokeswoman Michelle Baldanza, occurred last Monday, January 25.

    “A US RC-135U aircraft on a routine flight in international airspace over the Black Sea was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner. We are looking into this incident," she said.

    “The Russian Su-27 was flying next to an American electronic reconnaissance aircraft, and then made a dangerous turn and went to the side. The distance was so close that as a result of the shock from the fighter jet, the RC-135 lost control."

    There’s nothing wrong with AMERICAN intelligence officers in our zone of interests. Since ancient times, the Black Sea was called the Russian Sea and not the American Sea. Fly and train over the Gulf of Mexico, but don’t bother us - we’ll bite you. bully
    1. 0
      29 January 2016 11: 33
      Electronic reconnaissance aircraft
      quote from an article about "Chipmunks - Soldiers of the Guard":
      The equipment on the RC-135U was completely new and still remains secret, but, according to the Western press, its capabilities are “bordering on the fantastic”

      So he’s not interested in training over the Gulf of Mexico: so much money has been invested that an adequate return is needed.

      Risk is a noble thing. But why make claims then? Or did an intelligence officer visit the border areas of the Russian Federation on a friendly-partnership visit and not receive the same reception?
  61. 0
    29 January 2016 10: 56
    Ahaha)))
    Our handsome guys are doing the right thing, we need to show the Yankees who’s boss!!!!
    And those in their Boeing, don’t be afraid, were very scared, now they will shake the poop out of the cockpit))))
  62. +1
    29 January 2016 10: 59
    Our concept of professionalism is different. We understand this as the pilot’s high flying qualities, and they mean caution when meeting an aircraft from a neighboring state. Hence the conclusion - it is not for Americans to rant about professionalism in this situation.
  63. +2
    29 January 2016 11: 06
    Quote: Velizariy
    Trimmed what?

    I should have picked up a couple of dryers and taken them into the mattress cover box, maybe I would have tripped on the air myself laughing
  64. +1
    29 January 2016 11: 09
    You have to pay for everything. Even for “routine” flights in “international” airspace.
  65. +1
    29 January 2016 11: 11
    The US Department of Defense reported yesterday that an American reconnaissance aircraft was dangerously approaching a Russian aircraft flying over the Black Sea.
    This is how it should be. This is how the world should perceive news.
  66. 0
    29 January 2016 11: 14
    The morning was marked by two similar pieces of news.

    In the Primorsky Safari Park, one animal rejected the imposition of its species-specific concepts on other animal friends.

    In another zoo..., excuse me, in the Black Sea... Well, that’s what the article is about, I won’t retell the interactions between planes-friends.
    It is clear that the behavior of the partners in both cases is identical.

    It will be interesting to observe what conclusions the “offended” party will make in both cases.
  67. +1
    29 January 2016 11: 39
    “A US RC-135U aircraft on a routine flight in international airspace over the Black Sea was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 in an unsafe and unprofessional manner. We are looking into this incident."
    Eh, who would remind the Americans that military affairs, by definition, are an unsafe thing. And Russia did not sign up to ensure the safety of American flights. Stay at your bases to ensure 100% safety from incidents in the air.
  68. +2
    29 January 2016 11: 54
    Where is America and where is the Black Sea.... Fly closer to home and you will be happy and have a safe “flying”....
  69. +3
    29 January 2016 11: 59
    Quote: Maxsh
    I remember the movie "Case in Square 36-80"

    From another movie:
    Hey citizen! Don't go there, go here. Otherwise it will snow on your head and you will be completely dead. (Vasily Alibabaevich)
  70. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 00
    but it doesn’t say anything about Su-shka’s use of electronic warfare equipment...
  71. +3
    29 January 2016 12: 08
    Quote: 0255
    What do their fighters themselves lift to intercept the Russian Tu-95?

    They don’t risk flying to such a distance. The hands are not suited for this. laughing
  72. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 13
    Quote: TVM - 75
    Unprofessional in the mattress - this is when they climb to peep and eavesdrop in someone else's house, and they threatened to lather their neck. Let them swallow. In Russia, their rudeness does not pass!


    but professionally, apparently, it was necessary to overwhelm him and drown him in the Black Sea.
  73. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 14
    The distance was so close that as a result of the push from the fighter jet, the RC-135 lost controllability,” the Washington Free Beacon clarifies, citing a source.
    Are your pants still dry?
  74. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 18
    Let him thank fate that he was not shot down or irradiated by electronic warfare, so that all the electronics would fail and he himself would fall.
  75. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 23
    ...in an unsafe and unprofessional manner.


    What do they mean by “professional manner”? When you blatantly violate, and they persuade you not to do it? It’s just that their flyers are weak at flying like that. And after this, the Americans will say that their army is the strongest and its warriors the toughest?
  76. +3
    29 January 2016 12: 23
    "We are looking into this incident..." Yes That's it, students learn how to intercept planes. This is Russia, kids!
  77. +2
    29 January 2016 12: 32
    It was necessary to drop the fuel (outboard) tank onto the wing...
  78. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 44
    How about a military aircraft in an “unprofessional manner”? If you were on our roads, that's where manners are, you'd have to shovel the crap out of your car after every trip.
  79. 0
    29 January 2016 12: 46
    Let them say thank you that the pilot’s finger did not move on the trigger, otherwise the matter would have ended not only with the shabby underpants of the US reconnaissance pilots.
  80. +1
    29 January 2016 12: 49
    I wonder if they were able to detect the approach of our fighter? Or did you only see him through the window?
    Is this why they are upset?
  81. 0
    29 January 2016 13: 03
    It's all a lie! The Americans were rocked not by the jet of our fighter, but by the release of their own fart. So they're attacking us.
  82. +1
    29 January 2016 13: 10
    [quote=Lesovik]There’s no point in flying within the reach of our aviation)))

    And when gliders from NATO countries fly up and accompany our strategists as they fly over and inspect the globe, what is it called? And even after this they declare that they are violating something and in general it is ruining their nerves. Our Russian Aerospace Forces should give free advice to their NATO partners that if they want to fly over the Black Sea, then let them fly on Aeroflot planes. The nerves will be intact and psychological treatment will not be required.
  83. +1
    29 January 2016 13: 13
    Quote: fox21h
    Maybe he appeared in sight, and the p_endos have already piled up full diapers?

    Yes, no one “put it anywhere”, this is all written for people (ordinary people), pilots are absolutely calm about such things
  84. PKK
    0
    29 January 2016 13: 45
    I would like to know more about the condition of the Amer pilot. How long did he lose control, did his childhood flash before his eyes, did he think, why the hell did I come here and how did I cope with relaxation and the triggering of the goggle?
  85. +1
    29 January 2016 14: 15
    Yes, damn it, it’s not like controlling a drone from a couple of hundred kilometers away.
    Where is the video?
  86. 0
    29 January 2016 14: 25
    far from any Russian territory
    Crimea was recognized after all!!!
    the measures concern only the situation in Syria and do not apply to other regions
    FAIR! It’s your own fault, there’s no point in sending your shitty planes over our Black Sea to sniff out the situation!
  87. 0
    29 January 2016 14: 43
    This is all bullshit... the main thing is to tell me: how the pilot flew home with his pants full and whether he washed them or not... that's what's important...
  88. +1
    29 January 2016 15: 08
    Such news always improves the mood, and the comments are beyond praise, I laughed heartily good . But it would be more fun if our ace went up instead of to the side, what would happen then laughing
  89. +1
    29 January 2016 15: 14
    What if the “big brother” of the small plane arrived?
  90. 0
    29 January 2016 15: 41
    Right now the whole crew is probably washing their panties.
  91. 0
    29 January 2016 15: 42
    as a result of a push from a fighter jet, the RC-135 lost controllability

    Hold on tight to the driver! Ram!
  92. 0
    29 January 2016 15: 48
    Quote: zanoza
    Here again their word is against our word. Given that any contact with the Yankees is interpreted by them in a negative way, and their media draws this up as another fake, you should not pay special attention to the screams of US officials.
    Thanks to our pilot good , and the staff for rehabilitation after a nervous shock. Yes

    How is it possible to ignore the screams? A trifle, but nice. When they scream, it's like a drop of balm for the soul.
  93. 0
    29 January 2016 15: 51
    “The Russian Su-27 flew near an American electronic intelligence aircraft, and then made a dangerous turn and went away. The distance was so close that as a result of the jolt from the jet fighter jet, the RC-135 lost controllability, ”the Washington Free Beacon said, citing a source.

    there’s no point in flying where you weren’t invited...
  94. 0
    29 January 2016 15: 53
    Quote: severniy
    from jet fighter jet

    Chuyka, that that jet was not from a fighter ..... laughing

    Yeah, someone in the American crew is a little p....l, gas jet, however....... fellow
  95. +2
    29 January 2016 16: 06
    Quote: Helgi4
    AWARD THE Russian pilot!!!
    How would pind0s sing if the same Russian plane was making a reconnaissance flight off the coast of the “Land of Scoundrels”

    This was the case in the summer of 2015. The TU-95 flew up to the California coast the same 30 miles, and the pilot brazenly congratulated all Americans on Independence Day on the radio. The Americans shit themselves, and they raised a howl all over the world. By the way, our plane was also accompanied by US fighters, and no one shouted or took offense. A friend of mine graduated from the Orenburg flight school and flew on an internship with long-distance pilots across the Pacific Ocean. This was at the very beginning of the 90s, until flights were stopped. So he said, they are approaching the US coast, as always, 30 miles (you can’t get any closer): the commander calls him over and says, “You see the lights, trainee, this is San Francisco.” To the question “why did we come here?”, the answer was “so that they know that we will get them here too.” I'm glad that these times are coming back.
  96. 0
    29 January 2016 16: 13
    Quote: KRIG55
    de America, where is the Black Sea....

    Lost and confused with the Gulf of Mexico.
  97. +1
    29 January 2016 16: 15
    Quote: ArMax
    The Black Sea is not a place for walking RC-135U, here our people walk.
    And in general, more
    Al-Masoudi, an Iraqi, Arabian historian, geographer and traveler wrote in 943 On the Black Sea: “SEA OF RUS, ON WHICH OTHER TRIBES DO NOT SWIM, AND THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN ON ONE OF ITS SHORES. ”

    And our pilot (in my opinion) quite professionally hit "this tourist" with a jet stream.

    Yes, yes, and Prince Svyatoslav Igorevich in 965 said that everyone calls the Black Sea Russian.
  98. 0
    29 January 2016 16: 16
    So why complain, you attack everyone and everyone is silent, but when they cut you off, they threw a tantrum.
  99. 0
    29 January 2016 16: 25
    Quote: djqnbdjqnb
    they are controlled by a group of scoundrels who do not care about the interests of the Americans themselves, in this regard one can feel sorry for them, although it is their own fault, no one imposed their “democracy” on them.

    Some kind of Zhirinovism has already begun. If you feel sorry for the Americans... then what do we have? Don't go too far at all. I would love to live in a country with America's standard of living. With technology, like in America, salaries, freedom to do business. We are still up to their level.. Unless, of course, you are a deputy/assistant to a deputy or an employee of the mayor's office/authority. Then yes, your life is better.
    1. 0
      30 January 2016 16: 47
      Quote: IMHO
      I would love to live in a country with America's standard of living.

      And, of course, with government debt, like the SGA. Just beautiful.
  100. DPG
    +2
    29 January 2016 16: 49
    It’s not like they did all kinds of shit in front of our Ils in Afghanistan, this is normal and professional, but when they started flying back, they immediately started whining.