Military Review

Syrian "opposition" delegation refuses to negotiate in Geneva

49
Following the Turks that they will not come to Geneva in the near future for the negotiation process to resolve the situation in Syria, representatives of the so-called “moderate Syrian opposition” said. This was announced by a man who calls himself the deputy chairman of the delegation of the "opposition" of the UAR, - George Sabra. According to the TV channel Al-Hadas (it refers to RIA News), “A moderate opposition will arrive in Switzerland only if the obstacles preventing the negotiation process are eliminated”.


Syrian "opposition" delegation refuses to negotiate in Geneva


What kind of “obstacles” does Mr. Sabra say? It turns out that the so-called “moderate Syrian opposition” demands (namely, “demands”) from the government forces of Syria to lift the blockade from those territories that are under the control of “opposition armed groups” (in other words, the militants). In addition, the “oppositionists” demand to stop the bombing of the territories, again under the control of the militants.

Earlier, the head of the so-called "coordination council" of the Syrian "opposition" - a man by the name of Hijab, said he was dissatisfied about why the US accepts the conditions of Russia and does not put pressure on Moscow in order for Assad to resign. This once again proves the fact that earlier it was precisely such promises that Washington made to militants who had suddenly declared themselves oppositionists.

The reluctance of the Turkish delegation and representatives of the “Syrian opposition” to sit down at the negotiating table with the Syrian authorities in Geneva speaks only about one thing: the world in the SAR is not in the interests of either Ankara, or, naturally, pocket terrorist groups.
Photos used:
uk.reuters.com
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 29 January 2016 06: 51
    22
    They just need to be crushed if they do not want to negotiate, they are no longer the "moderate Syrian opposition", but terrorists.
    1. Mahmut
      Mahmut 29 January 2016 07: 01
      +1
      It's just that the time has not come yet.
      1. The black
        The black 29 January 2016 08: 35
        14
        All the normal opposition, which is really not indifferent to the fate of their own country, is fighting to one degree or another with the ISIS and helps our VKS intelligence, and all this pro-Turkish-American shobla are ordinary ghouls and murderers who need to be killed, not dragged from Geneva.
    2. vyinemeynen
      vyinemeynen 29 January 2016 07: 03
      23
      do not want to sit down at the negotiating table will lie down in the ground.
      1. scientist
        scientist 29 January 2016 07: 30
        12
        Apparently the “moderate Syrian opposition”, unlike their sponsors, the Turks and Saudis are well aware that no one will negotiate with terrorists who have their hands to the elbow in the blood of civilians. Therefore, a trip to negotiations may turn out to be a one-way trip - for life. And the Turks and Saudis will be completely compromised by their links with terrorists.
        In any case, for the ATS and Russia, the breakdown of separate negotiations is only at hand. The whole healthy apposition has long been agreed with the ATS government. Let's hope that by spring most of the terrorists in Syria will be destroyed.
      2. demo
        demo 29 January 2016 08: 16
        +4
        The most interesting thing is different.
        While sluggish negotiations and preparations for them are ongoing from month to month, gifts from the Russian Air Force are regularly falling on the heads of these oppositionists and fast trains with cargo are sent to Allah every day.
        If this continues further, in the near future no opposition will remain.
        Neither moderate nor immoderate.
        Perhaps this is our plan.
        But that’s why the Amerikos were led by him — that’s the question.
    3. crumb
      crumb 29 January 2016 08: 05
      +6
      right, it’s necessary that a modest dead option is obtained
    4. Blondy
      Blondy 29 January 2016 08: 39
      +4
      In general, I had a question about the philosophical plan: but we need to negotiate with all sorts of illegal armed banditations, starting with all kinds of "coalitions to fight terrorism" under the leadership of the United States and the CA without a mandate from the UN and SAR, ending with no one who represents other than mercenaries " moderate opposition "sponsored by the SA and others. Emirates, and even on their terms (for example, the Kurds were not allowed at the request of Turkey)?
      1. Al_oriso
        Al_oriso 29 January 2016 09: 35
        +1
        Only the United States and its allies can benefit from these negotiations. For Russia, negotiations will result in the assertion of their rights and positions.
    5. Pig
      Pig 29 January 2016 08: 39
      +2
      the geldings promised the guys "to deal with Russia" and as a result they brought the terms of surrender ... and of course the hijabs now began to suspect that they were "thrown" (how similar is it to Durkaina, isn't it?)
    6. Maksus
      Maksus 29 January 2016 09: 56
      +5
      Explain one thing to me. Why are the representatives of the "Syrian opposition" called to the negotiating table, while the representatives of the DPR and LPR seem to be ignored. Doesn't it seem strange to anyone in the world?
      1. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 29 January 2016 15: 01
        0
        Quote: Maksus
        Explain one thing to me. Why are the representatives of the "Syrian opposition" called to the negotiating table, while the representatives of the DPR and LPR seem to be ignored. Doesn't it seem strange to anyone in the world?

        The answer suggests itself - LPR and DPR are a popular movement, and the "democratic" West neglects the interests of the peoples,
        and the "Syrian opposition" is a paid project of interested countries, so they are fidgeting in place, afraid that their venal essence will come out.
        1. Blondy
          Blondy 29 January 2016 16: 03
          +1
          Quote: Maksus
          Explain one thing to me. Why are the representatives of the "Syrian opposition" called to the negotiating table, while the representatives of the DPR and LPR seem to be ignored. Doesn't it seem strange to anyone in the world?

          Guys, do not forget about Minsk.
  2. Funnels
    Funnels 29 January 2016 06: 52
    +6
    peace in the SAR is not in the interests of either Ankara or, naturally, pocket terrorist groups.
    That’s all said.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 January 2016 07: 08
      +5
      In addition, the "opposition" demand to stop the bombing of territories, again under the control of militants.
      I propose to go to a meeting with these "oppositionists" and intensify the bombing. Well, the siege can be lifted by giving a kick in the ass to the besieged.
      1. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 29 January 2016 08: 12
        +2
        In no case can a siege be lifted.
        Because it is a violation of the principle: evil must be punished.
        The exit from the siege should only be in the ground.
  3. maxbrov74
    maxbrov74 29 January 2016 06: 56
    +6
    Nothing wrong. About three months later, you can get together again. If any of them survive, then they will probably be more accommodating.
    1. Delink
      Delink 29 January 2016 07: 13
      +2
      And why do they sit at the same table with them, there is a neighboring one. Seat their bodies and enjoy silently.
    2. Altona
      Altona 29 January 2016 12: 35
      0
      Quote: maxbrov74
      Nothing wrong. Three months later, you can gather again.

      --------------------------------
      In the form of a salad, it will be easier to talk.
  4. Kos_kalinki9
    Kos_kalinki9 29 January 2016 06: 56
    +4
    The reluctance of the Turkish delegation and representatives of the “Syrian opposition” to sit down at the negotiating table with the Syrian authorities in Geneva speaks only about one thing: the world in the SAR is not in the interests of either Ankara, or, naturally, pocket terrorist groups.

    That did not require any evidence before. All this patchwork "Syrian opposition" sewn with white thread is only needed to once again vyaknut- "Assad must leave."
  5. B.T.V.
    B.T.V. 29 January 2016 06: 58
    +7
    What was required to prove: besides Syria and Russia, nobody needs peace and tranquility in Syria.
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 January 2016 06: 59
    +9
    And nothing so ultimatum! Losing on all counts, dictate your terms to the winning enemy. This is their conceit. Do they really not understand that the "big uncles" will not stand up for the poor oppositionists while our Aerospace Forces are flying over Syria, and the C 400 does not allow everyone else to fly without permission. It reminds me of Poroshenko at the negotiations, when the Debaltseve cauldron was smashed, and he puffed out his cheeks and tried to bargain from a position of strength.
  7. Koronik
    Koronik 29 January 2016 06: 59
    +2
    So he climbs everything inside out, now it will be clear who is who. And I think it is necessary to strengthen Assad’s military assistance until the Syrian army completely wins and liberates the entire territory of the country. And let them hold elections there, Assad’s support is overwhelming.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 29 January 2016 07: 09
      +2
      Quote: Koronik
      , now it will be clear who is who.

      And what you did not understand before. Who is who.
      1. LÄRZ
        LÄRZ 29 January 2016 08: 09
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And what you did not understand before. Who is who.

        Yes, even before September, we had a lot to understand. Only THESE at every corner violated that it was Gulchatay, and now Abdul’s grin has opened to everyone.
  8. Wolka
    Wolka 29 January 2016 07: 09
    +2
    Well, there is no "moderate opposition" in Syria, there are only "white" and "black" terrorists, and all the same terrorists, bandits and all sorts of adventurers hungry and eager for national wealth of the country, pursuing their own mercantile interests, but not sovereign national, therefore in their land in full ...
  9. KOH
    KOH 29 January 2016 07: 09
    +1
    Yes, it’s not necessary to rush to negotiations, another month and they will beg for them, and their requirements, we need to strengthen the bombing of our Air Force ...
  10. Revolver
    Revolver 29 January 2016 07: 12
    +2
    The delegation of the Syrian "opposition" refuses
    Wrong wording. It is their chiefs in Saudi Arabia and Qatar who refuse, and they themselves only voice what is ordered "from above".
  11. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 29 January 2016 07: 12
    +2
    There you can easily do without puppets! These negotiations need the United States and the militants to get a respite and regrouping-the Syrians, this protraction of the war is only to the detriment.
  12. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 29 January 2016 07: 17
    +2
    But they won’t come, the patamushta at the entrance of the weapon is taken away, and without a weapon it is necessary to use the language of diplomacy which is alien to the bearded men, it’s easier for Allah akbar to yell and cut Bosko ..... negotiations !!! You will say too.
  13. SERGEY UI
    SERGEY UI 29 January 2016 07: 19
    +4
    That's the problem, they don’t want it, they don’t want it. Assad’s troops are slowly crushing them, so they need negotiations more than the ATS. In half a year, there’s no one to talk to. laughing
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 January 2016 07: 22
    +2
    ... said the representatives of the so-called "moderate Syrian opposition."

    The Turks whispered with their "brothers" in international robbery and they decided to support them. Well, they do not want to negotiate, which means you need to "wet" to the end.
  15. nivander
    nivander 29 January 2016 07: 34
    0
    But they don’t want to cease fire during the negotiations?
  16. SERGEY UI
    SERGEY UI 29 January 2016 07: 36
    0
    [media = https: //twitter.com/NovostiDamask/status/692703083168661504] This is how you negotiate with the "moderates"
  17. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 29 January 2016 07: 37
    +1
    Syrian "opposition" delegation refuses to negotiate in Geneva

    Defective VKS of Russia. Goals should be adjusted ...
  18. Stinger
    Stinger 29 January 2016 07: 37
    +1
    They do not want negotiations. You will not be forcibly sweet. It is necessary to finish without negotiations.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. Siberian
    Siberian 29 January 2016 08: 05
    +1
    American puppets, the so-called Syrian "opposition," do not want to sit down at the chat table. So you need to increase the air pressure in kilotons. And negotiations are needed not in this corrupt Geneva, but somewhere in Beijing or Astana
  21. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 29 January 2016 08: 16
    +2
    Well, that would be suggested. And then the choice is theirs: either a chair at the negotiating table, or ... And do not swear at us in Arabic and Turkish.
  22. afrikanez
    afrikanez 29 January 2016 08: 45
    +1
    All these negotiations will be similar, as if to agree with America not to bomb anyone or when. Absurdity is complete. Stripping Syria completely and there should be no more compromises! good
  23. Thompson
    Thompson 29 January 2016 09: 00
    +1
    Each side sees the world in Syria equally, but the approaches to it are diametrically opposite!
    Hence, all this utopia and corruption will never go out. New Russia example.
    Therefore, since such a bloody mess, that in politics, and even more so on the battlefield, negotiations must be brought to the topic of CAPITULATION OF Militants!
  24. kos2910
    kos2910 29 January 2016 09: 00
    +1
    Well and good, time is on the side of the Syrian army. You look, and there will be no one to negotiate with.
  25. hartlend
    hartlend 29 January 2016 09: 16
    +1
    Why the opposition is necessarily the one appointed by Washington. With the same success, opposition "from Moscow" may appear and negotiate. Let them bite your elbows later. And I would also like to note that in the Slavic world, the word man had a deeper meaning than just body. It is advisable to avoid calling all kinds of hijabs people.
  26. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 29 January 2016 09: 20
    0
    Those who do not want to negotiate, but clearly want to fight, are clearly terrorists.
  27. Was mammoth
    Was mammoth 29 January 2016 09: 49
    +1
    The other day I saw a skirmish on TV of two Syrians. One for Assad, the other condemned the actions of the Russian Air Force. What is surprising, both have the second citizenship of the Russian Federation. How did they get it, because even from the former fraternal republics it is not easy to get it?
    It is hard to believe that there will be any sense in these negotiations. After all, there will not even be Kurds.
  28. Victor-M
    Victor-M 29 January 2016 10: 40
    0
    Syrian "opposition" delegation refuses to negotiate in Geneva

    There is only one reason, it (the Syrian opposition) is simply not there. laughing
  29. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 29 January 2016 10: 51
    +2
    It turns out that the so-called "moderate Syrian opposition" requires (namely, "demands") the Syrian government to lift the blockade from those territories that are under the control of "opposition armed groups" (in other words, militants). In addition, the "opposition" demand to stop the bombing of territories, again under the control of militants.

    The "opposition" today is not in a position to demand anything! If she continues to wander, then she will no longer have territories from which she demands to lift the blockade of government troops and, in general, her influence will diminish so much that she will no longer be of interest to ANYONE!
  30. black
    black 29 January 2016 11: 11
    0
    Let them roam. The longer they will be allocated, the fewer issues on the agenda of negotiations.
  31. Lelek
    Lelek 29 January 2016 11: 30
    +2
    (What kind of “obstacles” does Mr. Sabra speak of? It turns out that the so-called “moderate Syrian opposition” demands (namely, “demands”) Syrian government troops to lift the blockade from those territories that are under the control of “opposition armed groups” (In other words, militants.) In addition, the “opposition” demands to stop the bombing of territories, again under the control of militants.)

    What kind of OPPOSITION is this? This is the representative of DAISH in Europe and sit down with such at the negotiating table on the state arrangement "zapadlo". Yes, it is not rich in the West with opposition intellectuals, more and more trash podzabornaya with tinned throats.
    (in the photo this same George Sabra)
  32. triglav
    triglav 29 January 2016 12: 35
    +1
    But they would not have gone ... to other territories. They do not want a peaceful dialogue, they will receive non-peaceful. Until complete destruction!
  33. glasha3032
    glasha3032 29 January 2016 13: 08
    +1
    At the very beginning of the fraternal assistance to Syria, apparently our Foreign Ministry made a tactical mistake - appealing to the United States and European countries for assistance in defeating ISIS in Syria. France (now has a voice in the settlement) and a bit of the United States (only on some issues of interest to them) responded. Russia did not receive any real impressive assistance from them in the fighting in Syria. Does it make sense to sit down at the negotiating table with them, because they will most likely demand the partition of Syria, we need it? Should we have several small states hostile to us around Latakia, where is our base? Apparently, taking advantage of the hitch in the negotiations, the Russian Foreign Ministry should quietly sabotage these negotiations, shifting the responsibility for disrupting the negotiations on the "opposition" and smashing them as quickly as possible.
  34. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 29 January 2016 15: 24
    0
    It is necessary to bomb everyone who does not come to negotiations. Who will come later is good and his thoughts will be fresh, and who does not come, maybe he will not come at all ....