Military Review

NATO confirmed its decision to send AWACS aircraft to Turkey

58
NATO decided to send long-range radar detection aircraft to Turkey to reinforce Turkish air defense, RIA News statement by the Secretary General of the organization Jens Stoltenberg.




"In the south, we agreed to increase the presence of AWACS early warning aircraft over Turkey as part of continuing measures to strengthen Turkey’s air defense,"
said the Secretary General at the presentation of the annual report for the past year.

According to him, "at a summit in Warsaw in the summer of 2016, the leaders will discuss the crisis on the southern borders and the support of partners."

Earlier, Stoltenberg said at a press conference: "We received a request from the United States to support the coalition's efforts by providing assistance regarding reconnaissance aircraft AWACS, and we are currently considering this request."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. zao74
    zao74 28 January 2016 19: 47
    22
    What, it’s hard to see what the Russians are doing? They decided to spy ...
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 28 January 2016 19: 51
      35
      Well, and so they secretly impersonate that there AWACS jihad will track the cars of the barmaley? Ash stump is what we have in Syria.
      1. hrych
        hrych 28 January 2016 20: 03
        19
        Quote: 79807420129
        Ash stump what's behind us in Syria.

        But we will try "Krasuha" on this thing.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 28 January 2016 20: 14
          13
          Quote: hrych
          But we will try "Krasuha" on this thing.

          .. for me it would be better to missile 40N6E .. just about to shoot an experimental batch in the year 15 .. picture of September 15, when the first rumor appeared about the base in Jebla .. laughing
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 28 January 2016 20: 41
            +3
            .. for me it would be better SAM 40N6E ..

            By the way about the birds! That year, information slipped through, they say, on the basis of 40n6, a kinetic interceptor missile would be created. Well, like our SM-3. Say, instead of a 180-kilogram fragmentation warhead, the missile will be equipped with a 50-kilogram "blank". Thus, the flight speed will increase, and the range, and the height of the defeat.
            Has anyone heard anything like this?
            1. Asadullah
              Asadullah 28 January 2016 22: 42
              +1
              Has anyone heard anything like this?


              I heard that in anti-satellite systems this is the basis.
            2. Falcon
              Falcon 29 January 2016 09: 40
              0
              Quote: Wiruz
              Say, instead of a 180-kilogram fragmentation warhead, the missile will be equipped with a 50-kilogram "blank".


              If the disc - then there will be no sense.
              Sm-3 is far from a blank but a kill kinetic vehicle. A very complex stray, which has a seeker and is corrected at hypersonic speed, for accuracy of a couple of centimeters.

              So far, the elementary base has not allowed anyone to create such an exclusion, except for the states. Even in the Israeli hake, the Boeing KKV does. The brains there should not be sour, I think Baikal and the MCIST will not help.

              Our Soviet developments were quite larger and heavier:


              Since then, you yourself understand 25 years lost. So it’s not so easy to create your KKV

              Quote: Wiruz
              Thus, the flight speed will increase, and the range and height of the lesion.


              Height, and so you can increase if you want. the question is how to adjust the flight at altitudes for 40, aerodynamics do not work there.

              Replacing one warhead does not solve this.
        2. Arkuda
          Arkuda 28 January 2016 21: 41
          11
          Ready, gentlemen, NATO partners ?!
      2. ozon34rus
        ozon34rus 28 January 2016 20: 47
        +1
        Okay, uh, the time will come)
      3. Asadullah
        Asadullah 28 January 2016 22: 40
        +1
        what's awacs


        The signal is not very good. Eavesdropping, spying, they are good at satellite ships in a cluster. This thing in such cases can be used to control troops. Perhaps they want to rehearse. Now ours will graze behind this carcass by all electronic forces ....
    2. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 28 January 2016 19: 52
      18
      We need a Turkish fighter ....!,
      Are you ready for the USA, we too ...! Check each other out? Then run the basurman ...
      1. Red_Hamer
        Red_Hamer 29 January 2016 05: 37
        +5
        Oh, is this the guy in the picture, in August 2008, giving out a historical phrase when meeting with the Georgian column (not a single word from which can be written here)))) after which the column retreated? No lying, one word is possible, go))))
    3. NIKNN
      NIKNN 28 January 2016 19: 53
      12
      Whatever the child is amusing ... I have a cat in such cases, the genitals licks ... repeat
    4. The black
      The black 28 January 2016 19: 53
      17
      The oil caravans will warn: "The Russians have flown to you. Run Forest run!" smile
    5. KAV
      KAV 28 January 2016 20: 09
      18
      To what cynicism has reached, on a global scale ... Well, it is already clear to everyone that there is a war going on, it is clear between whom it is going on, on whose territory. No longer even include fantasy, in order to veil their actions and against whom they are directed. Straight big, world, "kindergarten" ... Dull excuses, dull reasons, dumb excuses for their actions. Eh, mattress covers ... Already the thirst for free profit has corrupted the unfilled and bottomless vents and deprived the flexibility of the mind ... Well, nothing. We'll have to give flexibility to this niggardly and overzealous pack of nits ... And if you don't bend, then break it. There are no more exits.
      1. Stanislas
        Stanislas 28 January 2016 22: 13
        0
        Quote: KAV
        It’s necessary to give flexibility to this snickering and presumptuous and snarling pack of nits
        This phrase recalled Makar and his song with the words: "You shouldn't bend under the changeable world, let it bend under us". The words are good, but Makarevich himself, like a snake, began to drive him as soon as Russia stopped bowing to the West. I suppose if we follow his advice and still beautifully drive away this changeable world, then Makar will become completely ill, as if he would not be bent. Don't remember this "idol" by nightfall!
    6. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 28 January 2016 20: 18
      +5
      NATO decided to send early warning aircraft to Turkey to strengthen Turkish air defense

      Well, did someone already sell airplanes in ISIS ?!
      No way to cover the oil caravans from the bombing!
      They lie like in kindergarten - "And it was not me who took it, but Petya ..."
      You might think that someone is about to fly into the Turks!
    7. Imigrantt
      Imigrantt 28 January 2016 20: 36
      +2
      Apparently they forgot about the Russian "BEAUTY" !!!! The most important thing is that after the eyes do not climb out !!!! am
    8. theodore rasp
      theodore rasp 28 January 2016 20: 46
      +1
      The Russian Aerospace Forces is not able to track this relic of the last century in principle. Or, as the saying goes: "Take pity that I am worthless!"
    9. Altona
      Altona 28 January 2016 22: 35
      0
      Quote: zao74
      What, it’s hard to see what the Russians are doing? They decided to spy ...

      ------------------------
      The object for testing our electronic warfare systems was sent. Soon, air control operators will go crazy in it.
      1. Dmitry Volodin
        Dmitry Volodin 28 January 2016 23: 11
        -1
        Will they be written off the board, like with the "Cook"? wassat
    10. 222222
      222222 28 January 2016 22: 59
      0
      zao74 (1) RU Today, 19:47
      What, it’s hard to see what the Russians are doing? They decided to spy ...
      ..magic (MAGIC- ..) will no longer help them ... laughing
    11. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 29 January 2016 05: 21
      0
      Moreover, on the 25th, our Su-27 intercepted their Boeing RC-135u reconnaissance aircraft, over the Black Sea, well, the kakly, as always, raised a howl about the unprofessionalism of Russian pilots. The closer we get to their scouts, the more "unprofessional" they are, in this case 20 feet, that's 6 meters with a tail. Probably straining additional costs for diapers for crews.)) Well, okay, it is alarming that the kakly are showing increased intelligence activity in the region, something is brewing.
  2. hartlend
    hartlend 28 January 2016 19: 48
    +5
    To make a decision is one thing, and to send is another. Money costs are, may not come back.
    1. Pete mitchell
      Pete mitchell 28 January 2016 20: 23
      +9
      “We received a request from the United States to support the efforts of the coalitions ... What request, the team received and rushed to execute. NATO is not a union of equals, it is a union of the caved in, forever.
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 28 January 2016 20: 55
      +1
      Quote: hartlend
      To make a decision is one thing, and to send is another. Money costs are, may not come back.

      If they made that decision today. In vain, not a good day for them.
      30 years ago 28.01.1986/XNUMX/XNUMX A tragedy occurred on the space shuttle Challenger
  3. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 28 January 2016 19: 49
    11
    And what happened to Turkey’s air defense? Maybe our C400s get in the way a bit? No? ..... The jackals are cowardly. Would crave for you, but don’t cost money to take off our attack aircraft. Litter all Europe splatter ... ugh am
  4. viktor561
    viktor561 28 January 2016 19: 51
    +3
    Fine! Schools pulled over - they are clearly losing their last ally in the region and they forgave them oil from ISIS - now they are protecting us - these are corrupt skins. I hope that against Avax we have our EWs
  5. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 28 January 2016 19: 53
    +2
    I think that the Turks were not specifically asked, the State Department said that when they shot down the Russian plane they came to NATO, and now you will have NATO as a guest at home! Also, the fleet will eventually be deployed on the Turkish coast on an ongoing basis.
  6. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 28 January 2016 19: 54
    +2
    Who there squealed that NATO, the Turks will definitely merge?
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 28 January 2016 20: 45
      +2
      If NATO was not a "subsidiary organization" of the Pentagon, then yes, the Turks would be merged hi
  7. Stinger
    Stinger 28 January 2016 19: 55
    +2
    Is the attack on Turkey getting ready? Or just soaked with fear? Such masters shoot in the back and are afraid.
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 28 January 2016 19: 58
    +6
    With 400 they can get these "Avaks" from their positions, and against our Sushki, the Turkish Air Force is about nothing ... They can put them in the back. And in air combat "bone to bone" - I don't think they have anything against ours. Zhenilka did not grow back. NATO is playing the fool again, provoking janissaries into extravagance. After receiving information from NATO "peepers", some stupid ideas may come into their Turkish brains, but there will be no one to keep them, as a result, the Turks will get it, and expensive NATO toys may fall ...
    1. The black
      The black 28 January 2016 20: 03
      +3
      Rather, serve as training targets for testing electronic warfare. Moreover, they are far from being the first in the Syrian campaign. Maybe this is the secret of the fact that Russia, announcing that it will bomb, will bomb the next day, and NATO declares "we have decided here, right now we will put on a formidable look and plan kaaaak"?
    2. Pete mitchell
      Pete mitchell 28 January 2016 20: 20
      18
      I don’t want to upset you, the S-400 will not get AWACS, this bastard will not enter the affected area. But the ability to control the actions of aircraft will increase. Dumping this big-eyed man from the sky with airplanes is a serious task for planning, they can handle it if necessary. It’s only that it becomes a priori goal, and you are right again - to automatically drag the Turkish allies into conflict. I won’t be surprised if the group is increased by fighters, preferably MiG-31mi.
      The bastards, of course, will soon start howling about "fanning the conflict by the Russian authorities", then, as always ...
      1. paul-muatdeeb
        paul-muatdeeb 28 January 2016 21: 06
        +3
        Of course, a system of 4 MIG 31 completely replaces AWACS. They were originally made to control other aircraft
      2. Asadullah
        Asadullah 28 January 2016 22: 46
        +1
        automatically pulling the Turkish allies into conflict.


        Exactly. It’s no longer necessary to retract, but to fully and quantitatively strengthen the actions, completely. Not for nothing that the Turks demand DIRECT NATO support for this. Apparently this is the first swallow.
      3. tolmachiev51
        tolmachiev51 29 January 2016 05: 50
        0
        The howl has already begun !!!!
  9. _my opinion
    _my opinion 28 January 2016 20: 03
    +8
    NATO decided to send early warning aircraft to Turkey to strengthen Turkish air defense

    who was going to fight with Turkish air defense?

    I thought ... Turks shot down our plane for crossing their airspace ... maybe Syria should shoot down all the planes that without the permission of official Damascus fly over its territory?
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 28 January 2016 20: 26
      +2
      Quote: _my opinion
      that without the permission of official Damascus fly over its territory?

      AWACS can observe all of Syria (and not only) without entering its airspace! And with our downed plane, not everything is clean. After all, it was said that AWACS acted as the dispatcher-manager.
  10. V.ic
    V.ic 28 January 2016 20: 20
    +3
    Something I do not like this news, I do not know why, but I do not like it.
  11. potalevl
    potalevl 28 January 2016 20: 25
    +3
    Lord, how much can you endure lawlessness on the part of mattress mattresses and others like them? Isn't it time to give an answer so that they wash themselves with bloody snot? And to give so that they gave their grandchildren and great-grandchildren their orders not to enter into a confrontation with Russia. So that at the mere mention of Russia, they would fear from spontaneous incontinence of urine and feces. Something like this. Lord forgive me a sinner. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, and now and evermore, forever and ever, amen.
    1. castle
      castle 28 January 2016 22: 31
      +1
      1) Spy and eavesdrop from satellites and in any weather. And for a long time.
      2) AWACS is likely to be used as a management relay. Tracking the operational situation, transmitting information to the leadership of the Western coalition and transmitting orders from the leadership to the advanced units of the Western coalition (the Air Force, or whatever specialists there) or direct management of certain operations in real time.
      3) Cool off a bit, and then here some comments begin to call for the outbreak of the third world war. Here, Russian legislation is already being violated (I hope the moderators know the laws), and for psychologists and psychiatrists a wide field of activity is opening up.
      1. Asadullah
        Asadullah 28 January 2016 22: 51
        0
        1) Spy and eavesdrop from satellites and in any weather. And for a long time .....


        Right two of your points, dear. According to the third, here some have been fighting for a long time, don’t take away the sweets from the children, otherwise send everyone who played Red Allert to the psychiatrist. smile
  12. sabakina
    sabakina 28 January 2016 20: 28
    +2
    C-400
    The early detection radar provides a detection range of up to 600 km.

    AWACS
    Target detection up to 400 km

    I am not an expert, but who will spy on whom? And what will the awaxed S-400 crew feel?
    Taken from the wiki.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 28 January 2016 20: 42
      +5
      Quote: sabakina
      I am not an expert, but who will spy on whom? And what will the awaxed S-400 crew feel?

      They will check Russia in Syria ... Turks run into Syria! What is not clear ...?
      They will try now, "will they knock it down or not .." The bastards will provoke ...!
    2. Wiruz
      Wiruz 28 January 2016 20: 43
      +3
      And what will the awaxed S-400 crew feel?

      How will they feel? Well, about the same as what the crew of Donald Cook felt when Bastion sighted on him, and the Su-24 "jammers" turned on laughing
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 28 January 2016 21: 44
        +3
        Quote: Wiruz
        And what will the awaxed S-400 crew feel?

        How will they feel? Well, about the same as what the crew of Donald Cook felt when Bastion sighted on him, and the Su-24 "jammers" turned on laughing

        And on the contrary, we have different feelings .... loveWhen the target is in sight (remember beloved women))))
        1. Dmitry Volodin
          Dmitry Volodin 28 January 2016 23: 26
          0
          Simpotyaga goal, I’ll go to the sniper good
          1. LeftPers
            LeftPers 29 January 2016 06: 22
            +1
            Better Scouts laughing
    3. andj61
      andj61 28 January 2016 22: 02
      +2
      Quote: sabakina
      I am not an expert, but who will spy on whom? And what will the awaxed S-400 crew feel?

      And AWACS are already there. By the way, at least two were in the air nearby when our plane was shot down - one American (in Turkey) and one Saudi (in KSA). This is NATO's statement about increasing its presence - that's all. And the S-400 detection systems are already irradiating them. Capture and escort, however, are unlikely to be carried out, so the pilots have nothing to worry about. And in that region not only our S-400: Turkey is full of air defense systems, and Israel and Saudi. And they all work, "irradiate", so to speak, including our aircraft ...
    4. V.ic
      V.ic 29 January 2016 10: 47
      0
      Quote: sabakina
      I am not an expert, but who will spy on whom?

      Dear, I give a tip to the well-known phrase: "I sit high, I stroke far away, do not sit on a tree stump, do not eat a pie, bring it to grandma, bring it to grandfather." So think about the ratio of flight altitude and viewing range. The higher the tracked objects are above the underlying surface, the higher the signal-to-noise ratio, and hence the distinguishability of targets.
  13. boroda64
    boroda64 28 January 2016 20: 51
    0
    ....
    - "it's not a tank below
    - but just a bus
    - but a very good goal ... "
    - / old rhyme - about the bus and the Madrid - children /
  14. 3vs
    3vs 28 January 2016 20: 56
    0
    Not otherwise, they decided to support the Iglov’s punks from complete defeat
    in Syria.
    Substitute the Turk under this business under some kind of provocation ...
    1. paul-muatdeeb
      paul-muatdeeb 28 January 2016 21: 11
      +1
      Of course, they also announced a ground operation in neighboring Iraq. They will slip their troops under the blow of the Russian Aerospace Forces. or try to stage.
  15. afrikanez
    afrikanez 28 January 2016 21: 13
    +1
    I wonder from whom the Turks intend to defend themselves? You might think someone is threatening them. negative
  16. beer-youk
    beer-youk 28 January 2016 21: 27
    +1
    Quote: NIKNN
    Whatever the child would entertain ...


    ... if only it would not be hung up!
  17. mr.grin19z
    mr.grin19z 28 January 2016 22: 12
    0
    they reinforce everything, they just reinforce something, their coalition is probably not visible, their pants are sitting at home
  18. Barakuda
    Barakuda 28 January 2016 22: 18
    +1
    They pissed away everything (everything was lost - it's a joke, Russia can pull it out). But these birds, modernized, would not hurt in that very Syria. They hummed under my buildings when I studied. It is a pity for "Antonov" practically khan, the government has sentenced sad And I saw them Akademgorodok-Bucha, N. Belichi near Kiev. airfields with a dozen. the rest hovered somewhere ..
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 28 January 2016 22: 32
      0
      The AN-71 didn’t go into the series because of altitude. It was prepared for take-off from an aircraft carrier, but the military didn’t arrange the altitude. The truth is that it didn’t suit the Yak-44
  19. red_october
    red_october 28 January 2016 23: 01
    +1
    Quote: 79807420129
    Well, and so they secretly impersonate that there AWACS jihad will track the cars of the barmaley? Ash stump is what we have in Syria.


    Respected! You're wrong! Aircraft with awacs in Syria are needed to track the migration routes of a rare species of mammals in the Turkish expanses - the Middle Turkish antelopes ringed by radio sensors! This is all done at the request of Greenpaece and WWF, everything is legal and legal !!!!!

    Am I the only one missing Jennifer Psaki?)))
    1. LeftPers
      LeftPers 29 January 2016 06: 27
      +2
      Welcome to the psaki fans club. bully
  20. Zomanus
    Zomanus 28 January 2016 23: 45
    +2
    but okay everything that everyone was so excited about?
    Well AWACS, yes, it will fly to Turkey.
    And what? Yes nifiga ...
  21. Wolka
    Wolka 29 January 2016 05: 36
    +1
    maybe the Turks are better at an enema and a magnifier at the same time ...
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 29 January 2016 10: 51
      0
      Quote: Volka
      maybe the Turks are better at an enema and a magnifier at the same time ...

      Better to everyone on a silk lace. At the end of the execution, the last remaining person is sent to a prison camp for 50 years.