Military Review

Atomic Rover "Eagle" will return to the Northern Fleet before the end of the year

34
Atomic submarine SF Orel, which suffered in April 2015 from a fire in the dock of the Zvyozdochka Ship Repair Center (Severodvinsk), will be handed over the fleet until the end of this year, said a representative of the company Evgeny Gladyshev.




“The Eagle will be handed over to the Navy without any delay, within the planned timeframe stipulated by the contract, at the end of 2016. In April, the ship will be launched ", - quotes Gladyshev newspaper MIC.

The fire on the submarine occurred during the fire work. “Insulating rubber coatings caught fire in the side of the boat aft. All aboard managed to leave the submarine, no one was hurt. To extinguish the fire, it was necessary to partially flood the dock-camera - to the level of the ship's waterline. Nuclear fuel from nuclear submarine reactors was unloaded, there was no ammunition and fuel materials on board. As a result of the incident, there was no threat of environmental and radiation contamination, ”the enterprise’s press service previously reported.

The submarine was built at the shipyard of JSC "Sevmash" and joined the fleet in 1993.

To restore technical readiness, the Eagle was delivered to the Zvezdochka in April of the 2014. “After the factory repair, the service life of the nuclear-powered icebreaker will be extended by 3,5 of the year,” said a representative of the Center.
Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. fox21h
    fox21h 28 January 2016 18: 45
    +8
    This is good news, well, at least something positive for today! I am curious that at least some conclusions were made about the fire, because this is not the first warship that we have been losing recently for a similar reason?
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 28 January 2016 18: 49
      +2
      Well, what about? More oil has grown.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 28 January 2016 19: 06
        +3
        "" Eagle "will be delivered to the Navy without any delay

        I think much earlier, or maybe already sailed to the "warm seas" ...
        1. 79807420129
          79807420129 28 January 2016 19: 15
          14
          Quote: MIKHAN
          "" Eagle "will be delivered to the Navy without any delay

          I think much earlier, or maybe already sailed to the "warm seas" ...

          Vitalik hurrying painfully, even as they say on the slipway at the plant is a colleague of "Kursk", in April they will be launched and tested. hi
        2. alex_V15
          alex_V15 28 January 2016 22: 07
          0
          APRK K-266 "Eagle" knowingly called Opel. As he did not climb out of the seas, he will continue to be in them constantly. Scare enemies.
          Interestingly, what will they do with him in 3,5 years? A deeper upgrade, it seems.
    2. severyanin
      severyanin 28 January 2016 20: 21
      +3
      Quote: fox21h
      because this is not the first warship that we have been losing recently

      Thank God they didn’t lose this one, although the situation was on the verge am
      1. alex_V15
        alex_V15 28 January 2016 22: 09
        +1
        On the verge were the deadlines! Rubber is still changed. And therefore - problems would be to the plant! And the losses - to him. A ship ... Would not have burned down! Ignition was where the worst was designed. Therefore, panic should not be raised here.
        1. severyanin
          severyanin 29 January 2016 00: 03
          +2
          And I don’t stir up panic, I’m just stating the fact: I saw how it burned - the flame rose above the docking camera ... And a lot of interesting things could be said about how to extinguish it, but ... I won’t, otherwise many "faint of heart" recourse
  2. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 28 January 2016 18: 48
    +9
    Something some kind of strange repair to extend the life of 3,5 years.
    1. kote119
      kote119 28 January 2016 18: 57
      +5
      called the restoration of those. readiness
      1. remy
        remy 28 January 2016 20: 01
        +5
        still they would replace RCC with P-800 Onyx or RCC Zircon with an increase in BC from 24 to 72 units
        1. kote119
          kote119 28 January 2016 21: 10
          0
          and who saw this Zircon?
      2. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 28 January 2016 21: 06
        +4
        Quote: kote119
        called the restoration of those. readiness

        This is understandable, but at such a pace, we will put the submarines every 3,5 years to restore technical readiness, instead of occupying the shipyard with the construction of new submarines, or a serious modernization of old submarines.
        What prevented the repair and modernization of the Eagle (to modernize the electronics, HAC, etc., etc.) with an extension of the service life by 10 years?

        I noticed that we are laying a small technical and modernization resource. For example, our Su-27 has a glider resource of 2000 hours, and US fighters have 6000 hours. The same thing with submarines, they go on military trips for years, and they serve much less and quite often stand idle in shipyards on the occasion of the next repair.
  3. polite people
    polite people 28 January 2016 18: 48
    +9
    You read the news of Russia and the news of Ukraine. SKY and earth. How could they give up all this. The most wild fooling in the history of the world.
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 28 January 2016 18: 52
      16
      Could. They were promised more than Russia has. Nuland swore by her mother, Obamba gave a golden tooth. How could you not trust respected people?
      Who knew that Smoked would turn out to be a skier, and a pastry chef a thief on trust?
    2. Anton Gavrilov
      Anton Gavrilov 28 January 2016 19: 22
      +5
      Why refuse it? They even had an 1 nuclear submarine? There wasn’t, and therefore there is nothing to refuse
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 28 January 2016 19: 28
        12
        Quote: Anton Gavrilov
        Why refuse it? They even had an 1 nuclear submarine? There wasn’t, and therefore there is nothing to refuse

        What nuclear-powered ship, their flagship of the submarine fleet, "Zaporozhye" is welded to the pier in Sevastopol, if ripped off from the pier, it will go to the bottom with an ax. hi
        1. Anton Gavrilov
          Anton Gavrilov 28 January 2016 21: 42
          0
          theirs
          иХ

          Well, 1 did this dive to the periscopic depth still.))
  4. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 28 January 2016 18: 52
    +2
    Or maybe wait until the boat returns to service and doesn’t make any plans? Since I almost burned it ..
  5. Barakuda
    Barakuda 28 January 2016 18: 53
    +1
    Either I’m not becoming reliable, I’m shod in skis on asphalt.
  6. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 28 January 2016 18: 56
    +1
    949A "Antey" is a handsome man, interestingly it was rearmed with "Caliber".
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Inok10
      Inok10 28 January 2016 19: 39
      14
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      949A "Antey" is a handsome man, interestingly it was rearmed with "Caliber".

      .. and, what for him "Caliber"? .. he has 24 pieces. 3M45 "Granite" on board .. 7t. starting, 2,5M speed (with a direct-flow experimental 4D04 OKB-670 gave out 4M) what is worth no one knows .. Armored warhead 750 kg., there is a SpetsBCH 500 kt., range 600 km. .. according to rumors, with such a mass overclocked to 2,5M, he is not afraid even of a direct hit by an anti-aircraft missile .. and an excerpt on the tactics of "Granit":
      In the rapid fire mode, one missile acting as a "gunner" flies along a high trajectory to maximize the target area, while other missiles fly on a low trajectory. In flight, missiles exchange target information. If the "gunner" missile is intercepted, then one of the other missiles will automatically take over its functions. The missiles themselves distribute and classify the importance of the target, choose the attack tactics and the plan for its implementation. To eliminate errors when choosing a maneuver and hitting a given target, the on-board computer (BCVM) contains electronic data on modern classes of ships. In addition, the onboard computer also contains tactical information, for example, about the type of ship orders, which allows the rocket to determine who is in front of it - a convoy, aircraft carrier or landing group, and attack the main targets in its composition. The on-board computer contains data on countering the enemy's electronic warfare, capable of jamming to divert missiles from the target, tactics for evading the fire of air defense systems. After the missile is launched, they themselves decide which of them will attack which target and which maneuvers for this need to be carried out in accordance with the mathematical algorithms incorporated in the behavior program. The missile also has a means of countering the attacking missiles. After destroying the main target in the ship's group, the remaining missiles attack other ships of the order, eliminating the possibility of two missiles hitting the same target.
      .. relevant and now .. hi
      1. kote119
        kote119 28 January 2016 20: 58
        0
        don't read the wiki for the night
      2. mvg
        mvg 28 January 2016 23: 23
        +1
        Yes, Professor Preobrazhensky also spoke about the wiki like this ... Granite (3M45) is an ideal target, for the most part of the approach to the target (altitude and ideal trajectory for SAM). What these 949A were built for, they will not do now. AUG attack, with the failure of an aircraft carrier .. Back in the 80s it was believed that at least 30 of these missiles were necessary for the AUG .. The first 22 were guaranteed to be destroyed .. (an article flashed on the VO not so long ago).
        Now 2016 is already in the yard. Air defense / missile defense AUG has grown. SM-2A, SM-6, Asters 15/30, Goalkeepers and all the rest of the crap .. And the fact that all 24 missiles will come out of the mines and fly after 30 years ... This still needs to be checked. 600 km .. Who will direct it? I do not think that the A-50U will be allowed to fly such a distance to the AUG.
        Py.Sy .: And to arrange a fire on a boat during repair, it’s a scribe, a scribble ... How about an American sailor who was in a hurry for a date ... Here, fuck
        1. Rus86
          Rus86 29 January 2016 07: 46
          0
          there was a welder, the contractor kind of like
    3. kote119
      kote119 28 January 2016 21: 08
      0
      But what is Caliber panacea for all boats?
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 28 January 2016 22: 31
        +1
        Quote: kote119
        But what is Caliber panacea for all boats?


        Not Caliber, but versatility, as pr.855.
        With the 949s Granites, only AUGs are suitable to drive, and the capabilities of the carrier are much wider than this task. Here's the installation on them of the entire spectrum of rockets from the 855th ... etozh what kind of pendoadmiral crap .. Guess .. why they downloaded there .. and who they hunt.
  7. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 28 January 2016 19: 03
    +1
    Well, with a handsome man, you got excited. Rather, man, bull. Beauties muzzle beat, with all my heart.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. goblin xnumx
      goblin xnumx 28 January 2016 19: 17
      +2
      if 949 buhai, then who was 941? :)
  8. Senior manager
    Senior manager 28 January 2016 19: 29
    +4
    For reference - Opel is called a loaf, or rather all 949's.
  9. gcn
    gcn 28 January 2016 19: 30
    +1
    The USSR was gone and the plants were working properly
  10. gelezo47
    gelezo47 28 January 2016 19: 38
    +2
    Good news! Now one more missile submarine will take up combat duty. The Pentagon will be "very happy"! ... yes
  11. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 28 January 2016 19: 52
    +4
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/050/ktgg972.png
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 28 January 2016 20: 20
      0
      I’m embarrassed to ask about the fire. The court will be and who will pay? Now there is a fashion: Repairmen are suing the MO, the MO is suing the repairmen. Maybe all the same, they sorted out among themselves quietly and would not be dishonored in the courts.
    2. kote119
      kote119 28 January 2016 21: 06
      -2
      on the poster, the crap is full, especially about paired pu, even on the poster it is clear that they are not paired, the crew is 130 people - and 118 people died of the same type in Kursk, so it turned out not to be staffed? Though it is necessary to include brains a little when you insert cheap posters
      1. Primus pilus
        Primus pilus 28 January 2016 21: 35
        +1
        Dear this poster reflects objective reality. fool
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock 28 January 2016 21: 42
          0
          Quote: Primus Pilus
          Dear this poster reflects objective reality.

          The torpedo 65-76 "Kit" was removed from service, it was she who was used through 650 mm torpedo tubes.
          1. Primus pilus
            Primus pilus 28 January 2016 22: 39
            0
            Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
            Quote: Primus Pilus
            Dear this poster reflects objective reality.

            The torpedo 65-76 "Kit" was removed from service, it was she who was used through 650 mm torpedo tubes.

            Through 650mm torpedo tubes, RPK-7 “Wind” can be used.
        2. dvina71
          dvina71 28 January 2016 23: 16
          +1
          Quote: Primus Pilus
          Dear this poster reflects objective reality

          If it will reflect objective reality - Article 276 of the Criminal Code