Military Review

Sevmash will continue to serve the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya

25
JSC Sevmash Production Association will sign new contracts with India for servicing the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the enterprise.


Sevmash will continue to serve the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya


“Currently, work is underway on signing new contracts for servicing the aircraft carrier of the Indian Navy Vikramaditya and supplying spare parts for it (spare parts, tools, accessories),” the release said.

“The operation of the ship in India is going well. The work on the fulfillment of warranty obligations was recognized by the Indian side as positive, ”the press service noted.

At Sevmash, it was recalled that “they handed over the aircraft carrier of the Indian Navy 16 to November 2013 of the year with the condition of annual warranty service”. Later, the Indian military offered the company to serve the ship "during the entire life cycle of the ship."



Help "MIC": “The agreement to acquire an aircraft carrier was signed in January 2004. India received the Admiral Gorshkov Corps free of charge with the condition of its modernization and equipping with a Russian-made air group, in addition, Russia pledged to train the Indian crew of an aircraft carrier. Initially, the total value of the contract was estimated at 1,5 billion dollars, and work on the re-equipment of the ship was planned to be completed in 2008 year. However, the timing of the implementation of the agreement has shifted, and the cost of the transaction, according to the Indian side, has grown to 2,33 billion dollars. ”
Photos used:
JSC “PO“ Sevmash ”, bastion-karpenko.ru
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. PKK
    PKK 27 January 2016 16: 39 New
    +7
    Well done Sevmashovtsy! Honestly fulfilled the order!
    1. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 27 January 2016 16: 45 New
      +7
      Did the Indians have a choice ?!
      In order to completely understand a ship of such complexity from scratch, in theory, you must first completely disassemble it. Alas, forgive the pun.
      1. seti
        seti 27 January 2016 16: 48 New
        +8
        Well, that's great. Hindus get quality service. Our budget is additional funding, and a simple Russian man work. Everyone is happy.
        1. dmi.pris
          dmi.pris 27 January 2016 17: 18 New
          +3
          All this is wonderful .. Some received service, others got work .. Question-And what did our fleet get ??
          1. oldseaman1957
            oldseaman1957 27 January 2016 17: 24 New
            +4
            Quote: dmi.pris
            And what did our fleet get ??
            - Well, they didn’t sell it for free, and our specialists will serve the aircraft carrier. Part of this money will go to the military-industrial complex and the modernization of our fleet. As in the hungry 90s, the sale of our military equipment over a hill did not allow the same military-industrial complex to bend.
          2. Simon
            Simon 27 January 2016 18: 06 New
            +1
            Experience buddy, experience! It is most important. Only our craftsmen from Severomorsk can remake old cruisers into aircraft carriers.
            1. sisa29
              sisa29 27 January 2016 18: 23 New
              +1
              Why offend Severodvintsy, so they did it all!
        2. Maksus
          Maksus 27 January 2016 18: 54 New
          0
          Not everything, Hindu chasing a ship halfway around the world is not an ice, although this is not our problem am
    2. Simon
      Simon 27 January 2016 18: 00 New
      0
      The main thing they learned to remake the cruiser into aircraft carriers. No one in the world has ever done this before and is unlikely to do it, except for our craftsmen from Sevmash.
      1. Maksus
        Maksus 27 January 2016 20: 25 New
        0
        In general, Vikramaditya was originally a TAVKR; no one from the cruiser remade it. At Sevmash, we increased and strengthened the flight deck for conventional aircraft, not VTOL aircraft. Apart from other alterations, of course.
  2. Dezinto
    Dezinto 27 January 2016 16: 41 New
    +3
    Well, yes ... it’s logical the Indians arrived .... they know that they themselves don’t really manage to service our equipment





    At the pier, the submarines are drowning. request
    1. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 27 January 2016 16: 57 New
      +1
      Batteries need to be replaced on time.
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 27 January 2016 17: 09 New
      +1
      Quote: DEZINTO
      At the pier, the submarines are drowning.

      Is it only the Indians?
    3. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 27 January 2016 17: 24 New
      +2
      Anything can happen ... talked to a person who has worked with the Indians for a long time, he says that the notorious "Russian maybe" is nothing compared to the carelessness that happens among the descendants of Mahatma Gandhi ..
    4. Maksus
      Maksus 27 January 2016 20: 30 New
      0
      Jokes, jokes, but the Indians are building a new aircraft carrier - Vikrant. And here Kuznetsov is no longer young, and a little too small.
  3. dsi
    dsi 27 January 2016 16: 42 New
    +3
    The exploded submarine taught the Indians something. So what's up with the Chinese aircraft carrier ...
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 27 January 2016 23: 23 New
      0
      There, the submarine has not yet pulled.
      1. dsi
        dsi 28 January 2016 01: 44 New
        0
        Sindhurakshak - Indian Navy submarine of project 877EKM. On August 14, 2013 at the Mumbai shipyard, as a result of the explosion and fire, it fell apart and partially sank [1].
  4. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 27 January 2016 16: 42 New
    +3
    Yeah. Now they would have built and maintained several such handsome men for our Navy, it would have been wonderful.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 27 January 2016 17: 06 New
      +7
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Yeah. Now they would have built and maintained several such handsome men for our Navy, it would have been wonderful.

      We need to build normal, atomic ones, but we don't need such people to repeat the fate of Kuzi.
  5. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 27 January 2016 16: 43 New
    0
    Making money for the motherland!
  6. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 27 January 2016 16: 45 New
    +2
    The Hindus understood, not by senka, the hat, in terms of service, so they "went to meet us"! More precisely, they galloped off with the entire crew of the aircraft carrier.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. barclay
    barclay 27 January 2016 16: 53 New
    +2
    Huge work done. I hope all this has benefited our naval shipbuilding, which is going through hard times. The next aircraft carrier should be built directly for the Russian Navy.
  9. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 27 January 2016 16: 55 New
    +2
    At first glance, a good offer providing long-term partnerships, of course financially beneficial and stable.
  10. pogranicnik
    pogranicnik 27 January 2016 17: 18 New
    +2
    we have this aircraft carrier, too, would not be superfluous, would work in bulk !!!
    1. Funnels
      Funnels 27 January 2016 17: 21 New
      +3
      Yes, it would have looked beautiful under the flag of St. Andrew.
  11. hartlend
    hartlend 27 January 2016 17: 31 New
    0
    Well, the leadership of India had the brains to give this order to Sevmash, and not to look for cheaper contractors like Ukraine or Romania. And yet, why are Indians here called Indians? In my understanding, Indians are followers of Hinduism. The inhabitants of India are Indians.
  12. King, just king
    King, just king 27 January 2016 18: 20 New
    +1
    I just don’t understand what the Indians WAS NOT ENOUGH to take Kitty Hawk for free, and buy 30-40 Hornets for him, but maybe they would give Hokai? To tinker with so many overdue years with the restructuring of Gorshkov who was shot without a jump-ski-jump, get on the headstock several times, have an accident, still buy decks ??? Apparently rolled back to our in wagons and Indians in turbaned. Or a high policy that we don’t know about.
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 27 January 2016 21: 47 New
      0
      Maybe because they had the intelligence not to put the aircraft carrier of their fleet in dependence on the country that sponsors, if not all, then 99% of all kinds of terrorists.
  13. King, just king
    King, just king 27 January 2016 23: 52 New
    0
    Quote: Dart2027
    Maybe because they had the intelligence not to put the aircraft carrier of their fleet in dependence on the country that sponsors, if not all, then 99% of all kinds of terrorists.


    About 99 percent, that's strong. K-a-k-and-e-s-t-s Your evidence? And then what is 100? But that's not the point. And the bottom line is that McDonnell-Douglas for the contract for the F-18, and maintenance and spare parts, and for the subsequent inevitable modernization, would cherish and cherish the Customer, tearing any unstable to a German cross. Taking into account when Kitty Hawk, and when the fuss on B. and Wed. East and North Africa began. And India, how to say ... is a very specific country, caste you know, not the "Muslim Brotherhood".

    And I’ll add, although it’s bitter for me to write: do I make my decks dependent on the country in which these decks are standing, or are not standing in service, what should I call it?
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 28 January 2016 06: 45 New
      0
      Quote: King, just king
      K-a-k-and-e-c-t-your evidence?

      For example, US open support for moderate Syrian opposition
      Quote: King, just king
      And the bottom line is that McDonell-Douglas

      will do what the US government orders her.
      Quote: King, just king
      And I’ll add, even if it’s bitter to me

      that in Russia, the military-industrial complex works despite any perestroika.
      MiG ready to deliver fighter jets to India for new aircraft carrier
      http://rusvesna.su/news/1453395350
  14. Wolka
    Wolka 28 January 2016 05: 32 New
    0
    if we discard Russian commercial interest, here it is, the market side of national security in the pursuit of super-armament, is more than indicative, well, why did the Indians acquire what they themselves are not able to service even in peacetime ...
    1. King, just king
      King, just king 28 January 2016 12: 02 New
      0
      And eastern show-offs?
  15. King, just king
    King, just king 28 January 2016 11: 56 New
    0
    Quote: Dart2027
    Quote: King, just king
    K-a-k-and-e-c-t-your evidence?

    For example, US open support for moderate Syrian opposition

    Quote: King, just king
    And the bottom line is that McDonell-Douglas

    will do what the US government orders her.

    Quote: King, just king
    And I’ll add, even if it’s bitter to me

    that in Russia, the military-industrial complex works despite any perestroika.
    MiG ready to deliver fighter jets to India for new aircraft carrier
    http://rusvesna.su/news/1453395350



    Moderate condoms, though they still look pale in comparison with the IG. We will not talk about terrorism, it is still unclear who supports anyone, and none of the mere mortals have information.

    Yes, what are you writing? Always thought the opposite! TNCs command the government.

    If you read carefully - what I wrote, then your answer on MiGs is at least illogical
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 28 January 2016 19: 10 New
      0
      Quote: King, just king
      Moderate, though condoms, but compared to IS

      Is there a difference? Both those and other DAISH.
      Quote: King, just king
      TNCs command the government

      Those who command the US government are holding a printing press.
      Quote: King, just king
      If you read carefully - what I wrote

      You about it
      Quote: King, just king
      in which these decks are either standing or not in service

      We have them in service, they have recently formed a regiment for "Kuzi", so they are.