Military Review

Tokyo strongly disagrees with the Russian position on the Kuril Islands

140
Japan considers the position of the Russian Federation on the South Kuriles unacceptable, but is not going to protest in connection with the statement of Sergey Lavrov on this issue, reports TASS report of the Deputy Secretary General of the Japanese Cabinet Koichi Hagiuda.




“We consider the position of the Russian side to be completely unacceptable,” Haguyda noted. “The position of the Japanese government on this issue is clearly expressed, and we do not think about taking any concrete action in connection with these statements (Lavrov).”

According to him, Tokyo "intends to continue to pursue an adequate policy in the matter of a territorial dispute with the Russian Federation."

On Tuesday, Sergey Lavrov said that the conclusion of a peace treaty with Japan does not mean the resolution of a territorial dispute over the Kuriles.

“Yes, there is an agreement between the President of Russia and the Prime Minister of Japan that among those issues to be resolved, the issue of a peace treaty is necessarily present. We do not believe that a peace treaty is synonymous with solving a territorial problem. This is a step that is necessary for the relations between the two countries to be normal not only in substance, but also in terms of legal content ”,
said the Russian Foreign Minister.

He also recalled that "the only document that was signed and ratified by the two countries in 1956, the so-called declaration puts the signing of a peace treaty in the first place very clearly."

“I repeat, this declaration, first of all, proceeded from the main thesis that it recorded recognition of the results of the Second World War by both the USSR and Japan,” Lavrov noted. - And without confirming this position, the results of the Second World War, as they are enshrined in the UN Charter, it is almost impossible to move forward. And our Japanese colleagues know about it. ”
Photos used:
Sergey Fadeichev / TASS Details at TASS
140 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 27 January 2016 09: 48
    47
    Well, and "who is their doctor"?
    Disagree, disagree! )))
    The main thing is that they heard what we told them!
    1. seti
      seti 27 January 2016 09: 51
      79
      Well, we categorically disagree on the position of Japan. They have a chance to return the Kuril Islands. If they become the Japanese Autonomous Okrug within the Russian Federation. May they thank fate that Hokkaido is still theirs. And then you can reunite the Ainu people ..
      1. umah
        umah 27 January 2016 10: 02
        19
        Let them write their disagreement on paper with beautiful hieroglyphs. So that we can turn it into a tube and put it in a hole.
        A hole to them from a public toilet, not the Kuril Islands
        1. Bykov.
          Bykov. 27 January 2016 10: 07
          12
          We consider the position of the Russian side completely unacceptable, ”Hagiuda noted.

          ... and made hara-kiri, himself and the whole Japanese cabinet
          1. meriem1
            meriem1 27 January 2016 10: 17
            21
            Quote: Bulls.
            We consider the position of the Russian side completely unacceptable, ”Hagiuda noted.

            ... and made hara-kiri, himself and the whole Japanese cabinet


            Sepuku, this is a whole ritual available only to born Samurai. End Great Warriors on the island. Only nagging and howling beyond. Let the Japanese prime minister challenge Putin to the battle)))) And then cry in the corner ....

            PS Lavrov so stuffed the topic ... just a sight for the sake !!! Calm and simple. Nefig was to fight! Signed commitments at the UN))) Nefig move like a hut on the ass! And then stop loving finally.
        2. oldseaman1957
          oldseaman1957 27 January 2016 10: 20
          +1
          Quote: umah
          A hole to them from a public toilet, not the Kuril Islands
          - It should be softer somehow. And then from the insult, the hara-kiri will start to do ...
          1. abrakadabre
            abrakadabre 28 January 2016 23: 41
            0
            It’s softer, it’s softer ... Then the rolled-up paper with their position before stuffing them in ... we remember a little ... For softer.
            1. Sssrkz
              Sssrkz 30 January 2016 08: 38
              0
              KURILYOUR !!!
        3. avdkrd
          avdkrd 27 January 2016 11: 07
          +5
          Quote: umah
          Let them write their disagreement on paper with beautiful hieroglyphs. So that we can turn it into a tube and put it in a hole.
          A hole to them from a public toilet, not the Kuril Islands

          directly offered the whole ritual)))
        4. ver_
          ver_ 30 January 2016 07: 50
          0
          ... hieroglyphics - dense distance - the language of the dead times - not worth the present - let them live in years ..
      2. Rav075
        Rav075 27 January 2016 10: 14
        19
        And I disagree with the presence of American military bases in Japan - in fact - the American occupation of Japan. Well, Japan does not have sovereignty, this must be understood. Therefore, all these disagreements are an initiative of the USA. Well, the US needs military bases in the Kuril Islands !!! And that’s it.
      3. akmalinin
        akmalinin 27 January 2016 10: 46
        +4
        It is also necessary to raise the question of the occupation of Hokkaido as expected after the end of World War II.
      4. Orionvit
        Orionvit 27 January 2016 10: 55
        +4
        So there is no longer the Ainu people, maybe a few have remained. All were cut out in the last century, only old photographs remained. Imperial Japan's racial policies were cooler than Hitler's.
        1. mahor
          mahor 29 January 2016 15: 42
          +1
          So there is no longer the Ainu people, maybe a few have remained. All were cut out in the last century, only old photographs remained. Imperial Japan's racial policies were cooler than Hitler's.

          Let them answer for this! And, at the same time, for the encephalitis tick! negative
      5. oleg-gr
        oleg-gr 27 January 2016 11: 41
        0
        Japan's dad hears only his own reasons. So the "owner" from the USA ordered them. Nothing changed.
      6. Al_oriso
        Al_oriso 27 January 2016 12: 16
        +2
        Regardless of the solution to the Kuril issue, Japan will always have claims against Russia. This is the basis of the alliance of Japan with the United States. In which case, America will wage war with us through proxy countries, including Japan.
      7. goncharov.62
        goncharov.62 28 January 2016 20: 50
        +1
        "If they become the Japanese Autonomous Region within the Russian Federation. Let them thank fate that Hokkaido is still theirs."

        Let them hold a referendum. We can help. Polite. But in general - it would be cool and everyone will benefit!
      8. mahor
        mahor 29 January 2016 15: 41
        -1
        Well, we categorically disagree on the position of Japan. They have a chance to return the Kuril Islands. If they become the Japanese Autonomous Okrug within the Russian Federation. May they thank fate that Hokkaido is still theirs. And then you can reunite the Ainu people ..

        It is necessary to raise the question of Hokkaido with an edge: return to the Ainam and a point! You get a hole from a donut, not the Kuril Islands! angry
    2. Vend
      Vend 27 January 2016 09: 52
      +2
      Quote: Mihalich17

      Disagree, disagree! )))
      The main thing is that they heard what we told them!
      Don't think they still hope laughing
    3. Megatron
      Megatron 27 January 2016 09: 52
      16
      How tired of this constant nagging. Is it really impossible, somehow diplomatically, to close this problem and not respond to their attempts?
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 27 January 2016 09: 57
        28
        Tokyo strongly disagrees with the Russian position on the Kuril Islands

        Russia strongly disagrees with the Japanese position on the Kuril Islands

        And then what ?!
        1. yugan
          yugan 27 January 2016 10: 02
          22
          Yes, they have such national fun - if a politician does not require the Kuril Islands, then he is a deer (from their point of view).
        2. marna
          marna 27 January 2016 10: 47
          +4
          Quote: Dembel 77
          And then what ?!

          And then ... Putin’s visit to Japan seems to be postponed from spring.
          People don’t understand that Russia will not even just talk about the Kuril Islands, while they (the Japanese) are under the American umbrella. Well, we also can’t launch the hegemonic region.
          1. faridg7
            faridg7 27 January 2016 11: 15
            14
            And the American umbrella has nothing to do with it. The issue of the Kuril Islands should not even be discussed.
            You won’t save any volosts (J. Miloslavsky)
            1. aleks 62 next
              aleks 62 next 27 January 2016 11: 39
              +3
              .... Some kind of volosts you will not stock up on (J. Miloslavsky) ...

              .... By the way - urka .... What he says, unlike many statesmen - had state and patriotic thinking .... Gaidai subtly noticed in due time .... And touched .... laughing
        3. Fregate
          Fregate 27 January 2016 13: 02
          +1
          Quote: Dembel 77
          And then what ?!

          So what is next:
          Tokyo strongly disagrees with the Russian position on the Kuril Islands

          Russia strongly disagrees with the Japanese position on the Kuril Islands

          Somehow smile
      2. igordok
        igordok 27 January 2016 09: 59
        +7
        Quote: Megatron
        How tired of this constant nagging.

        They need absolution. They understand that they can’t see the islands, but for the Japanese it is necessary to portray Russia as occupiers, not America, which it essentially is.
        1. igordok
          igordok 27 January 2016 10: 25
          +5
          I wonder why the word goat is considered obscene. laughing
          1. kotvov
            kotvov 27 January 2016 11: 18
            +1
            I wonder why the word goat is considered obscene,
            it can be seen depending on who and what.
          2. O. Bender
            O. Bender 27 January 2016 11: 31
            +1
            Mountain goat. Obama kazel. Feel the difference? bully
            1. Kolyan 2
              Kolyan 2 27 January 2016 12: 12
              +1
              In, you had to write lowered goat
            2. abrakadabre
              abrakadabre 28 January 2016 23: 45
              0
              Huh ... then write elegantly and scientifically, in Latin - capra ibex
              And add contextually: Obamicus or Japonica ... wassat
              Censorship script certainly will not cross out.
          3. CTEPX
            CTEPX 29 January 2016 07: 11
            0
            Quote: igordok
            why the word goat is considered obscene.

            Because his friend is Timur))
      3. Phantom Revolution
        Phantom Revolution 27 January 2016 10: 46
        +3
        Quote: Wend
        Don't think they still hope laughing

        Funny hope, because historically these islands did not belong to Japan. They themselves seized from RI in Russian-Japanese, and now they whine that they have taken.
      4. Phantom Revolution
        Phantom Revolution 27 January 2016 10: 46
        +1
        Quote: Wend
        Don't think they still hope laughing

        Funny hope, because historically these islands did not belong to Japan. They themselves seized from RI in Russian-Japanese, and now they whine that they have taken.
    4. vlad66
      vlad66 27 January 2016 09: 54
      14
      Well, I do not agree, and what of this. I was not upset.
    5. Finches
      Finches 27 January 2016 09: 54
      14
      "... she recorded the recognition of both the USSR and Japan of the results of the Second World War" - to the children of Fujiyama and their owners from the ocean, we must also recall that Uncle Joe forgave them Hokkaido, otherwise they would have riveted their robots on the top of the sacred mountain! laughing
    6. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 27 January 2016 09: 58
      +9
      Let them sit on the priest exactly ... Their consent is not required!
      1. SveTok
        SveTok 27 January 2016 10: 44
        +2
        The argument is not worth a damn, soon from the rise in sea level this issue will be resolved on its own.
    7. Uran
      Uran 27 January 2016 10: 29
      0
      smoked we will not give it back to the Japanese
    8. Pig
      Pig 27 January 2016 10: 50
      0
      the question should be put like this:
      geldings from Okinawa and from Japan in general - then a bazaar for the islands ... maybe ... after a rain on Thursday ... when the cancer on the mountain whistles ...
      and then the samurai decided for the "liver" in the form of membership in the ji8 they right now, right now, they will drive the islands;) the "American advisers" advised the campaign
    9. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 27 January 2016 11: 14
      +3
      How bored they are, they set it up like a "stuck" record, like in the joke - "throw out the tree, throw out the tree." The question should be asked again - "if the land is so needed, why aren't the Americans expelled from Okinawa?"
    10. max702
      max702 27 January 2016 13: 05
      +2
      Japan is the staunchest vassal of the United States, remembering the traditions of this country backed up by the military presence and economic stranglehold of the United States, there is no peace treaty, and therefore the beginning of full-fledged cooperation between Russia and Japan, is out of the question (this is death for the United States, similar to the beginning of full-scale cooperation between Russia with Germany) .. This is such an analogue of "Crimea" in Russian-Japanese relations .. And the United States will always stir up this far-fetched question, in Japan they are well aware that they will not see the islands, in the 90s there was a chance but did not put the squeeze on, now it is not real! And what is left for them? Constantly whine at the behest of the owner, and wait for either Russia will weaken and it will be possible to take its own, or when the owner loses his grip and cannot control the actions of his vassal .. So the choice of the Yap is not great .. If you hit the wheel, squeal, but run ..
    11. Berthan
      Berthan 27 January 2016 13: 27
      0
      Anyway - how much you can already chew it ... V.V. seems to be quite definitely summarized:
  2. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 09: 49
    11
    Japan considers the position of the Russian Federation on the South Kuril Islands unacceptable

    Well, do not agree, and what? Take a massive seppuku in protest. I’m not sure that this will help, but you will demonstrate the samurai spirit.
    1. Private27
      Private27 27 January 2016 10: 12
      +2
      Where is Seppuku? ** Joke ** laughing
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 27 January 2016 11: 43
        0
        Quote: Private27
        Where is Seppuku? ** Joke **

        You would have to joke everything)))
        Seppuku is when "komutohrenovato" ie. in translation from the diplomatic language - the impending drop in the rating of the Deputy Secretary General of the Japanese Cabinet of Ministers Koichi Hagiuda and the entire Japanese government due to the lack of a positive solution to the Kuril issue, after which an unambiguous "hara-kiri" sets in.
  3. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 27 January 2016 09: 50
    10
    Our Foreign Minister gave an excellent answer on this subject. It's time to close the question for all sorts of speculation.
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 27 January 2016 10: 12
      +5
      Quote: Dwarfik
      Our Foreign Minister gave an excellent answer on this subject. It's time to close the question for all sorts of speculation.

      All this controversy surrounding the islands is only because every time we comment on, discuss, and refute at the level of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and senior officials. It is time to say in high tribunes that the QUESTION IS CLOSED !!!
      Recognizing the existence of this problem, we ourselves throw firewood into the fire!
      1. Svetlana
        Svetlana 27 January 2016 12: 22
        +3
        Quote: APASUS
        All this controversy surrounding the islands is only because every time we comment on, discuss, and refute at the level of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and senior officials. It is time to say in high tribunes that the QUESTION IS CLOSED !!!
        Recognizing the existence of this problem, we ourselves throw firewood into the fire!

        Absolutely right! The results of World War II are not subject to revision; we, as winners in this war, must first of all remember this. The people remember something, but our corrupt bureaucratic "elite" .... H.re.n knows what to expect from her. On the one hand, Putin is striving to achieve independence from the West, but things are moving very slowly, one step forward, two steps back. First, you need to achieve economic independence, and then you can dictate your own conditions. But we don't have it. The Japs, incited by America, understand this and will not calm down until they are again imprinted on the oblique snouts. I think that the transfer of the Kuriles on the quiet will not work, as with the islands on the Amur. The people in Russia will arrange such a grandiose nix that all volcanoes in the Kuriles will wake up. But you rightly said that the discussions are continuing, although they should not be. The existing peace treaty cannot be signed, it was drawn up not by us, but by the Americans, and by signing it, we will be forced to make concessions to the Japanese on the territorial issue, since it was drawn up like that. Therefore, the Americans are pulling Japan by the strings, demanding that they sign the treaty, which Stalin refused to sign. If Lavrov promises to discuss the signing of this agreement, it means that he gives the Japanese hope for the return of the Kuriles.
  4. Vladimyrych
    Vladimyrych 27 January 2016 09: 50
    +1
    And what do we have with their disagreement? Do not agree - choke on resentment and swing on the sakura silently.
  5. alex-cn
    alex-cn 27 January 2016 09: 51
    +2
    Do not agree - and do not.
    Russia will continue to strengthen the Kuril Islands.
    Until they themselves agree.
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 27 January 2016 10: 08
      20
      This week, the Japanese have not yet shown concern about the ownership of the "northern islands." I really wondered if something happened ...? belay Ah no! Everything is fine, after this statement calmed down good
  6. bad
    bad 27 January 2016 09: 51
    +4
    Tokyo strongly disagrees with the Russian position on the Kuril Islands
    ..we have laid our narrow-eyed opinion..you will answer us back in 1905 ..
  7. fairmen
    fairmen 27 January 2016 09: 52
    +2
    from dohlova donkey ears to them and not Kuril bamboo let them smoke
  8. Boos
    Boos 27 January 2016 09: 52
    +1
    If the samurai does not succeed, but cannot change anything, he makes a seppuko!)
    1. Robinzone
      Robinzone 27 January 2016 10: 44
      0
      But what kind of a samurai is he, figs, a sneak that surfaced on the surface of an official bog, as a maximum. Where did he get the sword from? In the best case, a knife for opening correspondence. wink
  9. Fitter65
    Fitter65 27 January 2016 09: 52
    0
    They categorically disagree; we categorically disagreed with their categorical disagreement without unnecessarily categorical, lay and will lay.
  10. ILIA
    ILIA 27 January 2016 09: 52
    +1
    I think bargaining is not appropriate here)))))
    1. ILIA
      ILIA 27 January 2016 09: 53
      0
      Give me back ..))
      1. ILIA
        ILIA 27 January 2016 09: 55
        +1
        Let's pretend to some sort of territory .... let them prove that they are not camels) and there will be no peace treaty until it satisfies us))))
        1. gunya
          gunya 27 January 2016 12: 20
          0
          and there will be no peace treaty until it satisfies us))))


          What is the "peace treaty" with the surrendered?
          Enough 1956 decisions.
    2. not a Jew
      not a Jew 27 January 2016 10: 06
      +2
      Quote: ILIA
      I think bargaining is not appropriate here)))))



      uh, you don’t have to rush. After two years the presidential election and it is not known who will win them. Maybe some liberal bastard who will sell not only the Kuril Islands will win.
  11. vvp2412
    vvp2412 27 January 2016 09: 54
    +2
    We put a bolt on their consent or disagreement! Let the Americans say they disagree with their base in Okinawa!
    We are fucking for the Wishlist of the former samurai!
  12. Brutal
    Brutal 27 January 2016 09: 55
    10
    Not mine, well, terribly like:
    "Melted like a snowflake in my palm.
    Samurai life.
    Kalashnikov! " crying
  13. Lelek
    Lelek 27 January 2016 09: 55
    0
    (Japan considers the position of the Russian Federation on the South Kuril Islands unacceptable, but is not going to protest in connection with the statement of Sergey Lavrov on this issue.)

    And we US ​​... THAT! Let them repeat this mantra until they turn blue.
    "A hole for you from a donut, not the Kuril Islands ..." (G. Zhiglov). bully
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 27 January 2016 09: 55
    +7
    Japan considers the position of the Russian Federation on the South Kuril Islands unacceptable

    Japan missed its chance to jointly develop the islands. Late to twitch when the process is complete. It may be necessary to write and remind the Japanese more often about the war crimes tribunal committed by Japan. And then they modestly do not remember the atomic bombing of the United States, but the islands they have in the foreground.
  15. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 27 January 2016 09: 56
    +2
    That's what restless, the eighth decade has gone, and they can’t sign the whole peace treaty, because they themselves are to blame, we didn’t start the war, so take offense gentlemen samurai.
  16. Zomanus
    Zomanus 27 January 2016 09: 56
    +1
    They go to the goat ... with their Wishlist.
    Let them get ready for the cataclysm, narrow-film.
    Usually this is exactly what all their Wishlist ends at the expense of our islands.
    We need to equip our islands in terms of defense,
    so that they do not have such thoughts.
    And, you can also touch them nobly,
    arrange meetings with the Chinese there, discussions.
  17. Stinger
    Stinger 27 January 2016 10: 05
    0
    The main thing is that we agree. Including the fact that they do not agree with our consent.
  18. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 27 January 2016 10: 06
    +4
    The Kuril Islands are: beautiful places, huge reserves of hydrocarbons, natural resources (rare), huge stocks of seafood and the opportunity to consider the Sea of ​​Okhotsk -internal sea! I had to be, I know! Therefore, I consider the question of their affiliation settled, they are Russian forever and a point.
  19. V.ic
    V.ic 27 January 2016 10: 06
    +4
    The Japs are dreaming of the Kuril Islands,
    To know not that they smoked again.
    Do not consume fly agaric
    And do not climb to us in the "Okhotsko sea".
    Let them hang in their brains
    Heavy weight:
    Is it time to make hara-kiri?
  20. Dam
    Dam 27 January 2016 10: 06
    +1
    Do not agree? There is only one way out - massive Harakiri. We got puppets already. To get started, take the American hand out of your ass, then it will be clear who is nodding, a Japanese politician or a State Department doll.
  21. Conscience
    Conscience 27 January 2016 10: 07
    +2
    in my opinion so Japan is a toilet country - its America bent over with an atomic bomb, and they lick it backside - samurai negative
  22. MarKon
    MarKon 27 January 2016 10: 07
    0
    as Sharikov said "I do not agree"))
  23. triglav
    triglav 27 January 2016 10: 12
    +2
    All their Japs islands profiled. Now - free. This is for Port Arthur and more.
  24. 3vs
    3vs 27 January 2016 10: 13
    +1
    As Russians, will we accept the Japanese region as part of Russia? laughing
    Then there will be no more questions!
    1. eugraphus
      eugraphus 29 January 2016 06: 54
      0
      The "Japanese region" will have the same population as the rest of Russia. And as citizens of Russia, they will legally begin to settle throughout the territory of our Motherland. And Russia will add crap with American bases, "now" already on its territory. Something like this is not a fusion to me.
  25. BOB044
    BOB044 27 January 2016 10: 15
    +2
    We don’t need a foreign land, but we won’t give up our own. From a dead donkey ears and not the Kuril Islands to you Yapono mother. hi
  26. Abbra
    Abbra 27 January 2016 10: 21
    0
    Oh, the Japanese! Do you be sad?
  27. Taygerus
    Taygerus 27 January 2016 10: 24
    +1
    the national fun of Japanese politicians to ask the Kuril Islands, well, that dreaming is not harmful, especially without sovereignty and being in occupation, damn figures
  28. shelva
    shelva 27 January 2016 10: 24
    0
    It is even strange that they "silently do not accept" only for the Kuril Islands, and they could also keep silent for Sakhalin.
  29. kos2910
    kos2910 27 January 2016 10: 25
    0
    Well, these Japanese already got it, they build themselves offended from themselves. Let them first free themselves from the US occupation, then maybe we can talk, but nothing more ...
  30. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 27 January 2016 10: 26
    0
    “We consider the position of the Russian side to be completely unacceptable,” Haguyda noted. “The position of the Japanese government on this issue is clearly expressed, and we do not think about taking any concrete action in connection with these statements (Lavrov).”
    And we consider the position of the Japanese side completely unacceptable. The position of the Russian government on this issue is clearly expressed, and we are not thinking about taking any specific actions in connection with the statements of Hagiud.)))

    The South Kuril Islands became part of the USSR, the successor of which was Russia, according to the results of the Second World War, and Russian sovereignty over them, having the appropriate international legal design, is not in doubt.

    When it comes to the Kuril Islands, read it comes to the entire territory of the Asian component of the Russian Federation, and yes to everything. Not so sick, the Japanese want. I’m silent about the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. But without kaklov and their arming here it just could not have done.
  31. Armax
    Armax 27 January 2016 10: 26
    0
    "Tokyo" intends to continue to pursue an adequate policy on the issue of the territorial dispute with the Russian Federation. "
    And has she (Japan’s Kuril policy) ever been adequate?
  32. Jarserge
    Jarserge 27 January 2016 10: 29
    +2
    Japan is a colony of the USA! Who is interested in the opinion of the colony?
    1. Nitarius
      Nitarius 27 January 2016 10: 39
      +1
      that's just the point that no! Yes, there is ambition! But let THEY BEGIN TO US IN THE COURT will be filed for the NUCLEAR BOMBING of PEACE CITIES! then the conversation will be!
      and let them shut up!
  33. Ros 56
    Ros 56 27 January 2016 10: 32
    0
    The question is, who owns Okinawa, and what are the Americans doing there? You cannot decide what you have, because you are independent. Just give you, tomorrow there will be striped.
  34. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 27 January 2016 10: 33
    +1
    “We consider the position of the Russian side to be completely unacceptable,” Haguyda noted. “The position of the Japanese government on this issue is clearly expressed, and we do not think about taking any concrete action in connection with these statements (Lavrov).”

    We don’t think, because we can’t do anything. And indeed, they will stop supplying their goods to us.
    According to him, Tokyo "intends to continue to pursue an adequate policy in the matter of a territorial dispute with the Russian Federation."

    That is ... they will stupidly wait for Russia's weakening, for some reason. Or the corrupt liberals coming to power.

    I’m wondering ... do we ourselves need this peace treaty at all? What will it give us? And is it possible that there was some kind of piece of paper in the history that stopped anyone from the war? Ignore them completely! Goods? Let them carry it. Peace agreement? Only on the terms RF
  35. mpzss
    mpzss 27 January 2016 10: 33
    +1
    So I look at all the attempts of Japan to return these islands and I have a question: WHY DO THEY WANT TO RETURN THEM THEM AND ONLY THEM !?
    If you look at the map of Japan after the First World War, then they can also sway at Sakhalin, part of Kamchatka, not to mention China, Vietnam and Korea.
    The question is THAT they there and ONLY forgot there! The islands are not so big, they will not be saved by this territory for the global expansion of the country.
    Perhaps they either hid something there in due time, well, or found something interesting, but could not take it out on time ...
    I understand that this is nonsense, but nevertheless, they reconciled after all with large losses of the territory!
  36. Stauffenberg
    Stauffenberg 27 January 2016 10: 34
    +2
    Samurai go on the attack. Banzai!
  37. Kamchatsky
    Kamchatsky 27 January 2016 10: 35
    +2
    In general, it is surprising - a country that has lost the war is trying to say something to the winners? Or there are no brains at all, or the American hand is so deep in theirs .. that holds them by the Adam's apple.
  38. sibiryk
    sibiryk 27 January 2016 10: 46
    0
    Quote: seti
    They have a chance to return the Kuril Islands.

    They have no chance
  39. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 27 January 2016 10: 49
    0
    Iturup is the only economically viable rhenium deposit; Each year, the volcano emits, as part of volcanic gases, 20 tons of metal. World production, with 40-50 tons. Metal is very expensive and in demand.

    This is just one example, among other mineral wealth (which in Japan is tiny). Maybe this is the whole point?
    1. ayuric
      ayuric 27 January 2016 11: 51
      +2
      add a little bit:
      On the islands and in the coastal zone, industrial reserves of non-ferrous metal ores, mercury, natural gas, and oil have been explored. On the island of Iturup, in the area of ​​the Kudryavy volcano, there is the richest rhenium mineral deposit known in the world. Here, at the beginning of the 1867th century, the Japanese mined native sulfur. The total gold resources in the Kuril Islands are estimated at 9284 tons, silver - 39,7 tons, titanium - 273 million tons, iron - XNUMX million tons. At present, there are few mining developments.
      по материалам https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D
      0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0
  40. gelezo47
    gelezo47 27 January 2016 10: 55
    +2
    There is a document signed by Japan and the USSR. What kind of return can be discussed, gentlemen, the Japanese!? ...
  41. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 27 January 2016 10: 59
    +1
    We will start talking about the territories only if Japan is liberated from American occupation and there is a complete absence of a mattress-and-strip contingent on Japanese soil.
    We do not solve important issues with sixes. There is nothing to talk about.
    And what is not clear here? This small condition will long discourage the desire to raise the issue of the Kuril Islands.
  42. excomandante
    excomandante 27 January 2016 11: 05
    0
    Something the Japanese with their stupid obstinacy began to resemble crested monkeys))) That Crimea, yes put it down, this - the Kuril Islands ... The trend, however. Maybe I don’t understand something in high diplomacy, but it’s been very vain that they recently donated a piece of Russian territory to Norway and China. Apparently, the Japanese are genuinely perplexed - why are they worse than China. In general, others also wanted to.
  43. Straus_zloy
    Straus_zloy 27 January 2016 11: 05
    +2
    The Japanese are not solos? well . they can clog into a corner and cry.
  44. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 27 January 2016 11: 05
    +1
    Met, exchanged views, diverged in views. Well, what do you need to set a date for a new meeting?
  45. Orionvit
    Orionvit 27 January 2016 11: 05
    0
    Quote: igordok
    I wonder why the word goat is considered obscene. laughing

    So is the goat, rooster, chicken, ram, sheep, bull, cow, donkey, deer, elk, pig, and almost half of all other animals, depending on the context. I.A. Krylov used this very subtly in his fables.
  46. atamankko
    atamankko 27 January 2016 11: 11
    0
    No need to distort and redraw maps, our Kuril Islands and the point.
  47. Orionvit
    Orionvit 27 January 2016 11: 16
    0
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Japan considers the position of the Russian Federation on the South Kuril Islands unacceptable

    Japan missed its chance to jointly develop the islands. Late to twitch when the process is complete. It may be necessary to write and remind the Japanese more often about the war crimes tribunal committed by Japan. And then they modestly do not remember the atomic bombing of the United States, but the islands they have in the foreground.

    So it has already reached the point of absurdity. Currently, most Japanese people strongly believe that the Russians dropped atomic bombs on Japan, and they chopped off the smokers from poor Japan. The results of American propaganda. Few people know the real story in Japan, and are not going to teach.
  48. Max_Bauder
    Max_Bauder 27 January 2016 11: 17
    +8
    We don’t get tired and we giving out such an answer laughing
  49. Simon
    Simon 27 January 2016 11: 23
    +1
    Japs broke off. Let them know and remember that it is impossible to fight with Russia, it will be unprofitable.
  50. shax
    shax 27 January 2016 11: 25
    0
    The Japanese do not agree well, rotten cuttlefish
    in their mouths.