Military Review

"Sarmat" will replace the "Governor"

80
The new generation of ICBMs will ensure the neutralization of any potential threats.


Western sanctions, a crisis in the economy, military operations of the VKS against the Islamic State banned in our country ... How the strategic deterrence tasks that are primarily assigned to the Strategic Missile Forces are solved under these conditions, the strategic missile forces commander told the Military Industrial Courier destination Colonel-General Sergey Karakayev.

- Sergey Viktorovich, what were the results of the 2015 school year for your troops?

- The level of training of formations and military units as a whole ensured the fulfillment of the tasks assigned by the Minister of Defense for the 2015 academic year. Combat training plans implemented in full.

In the 2015 school year, work was continued on mastering the personnel of new technology, a missile regiment was retrained for a new missile system. Due to the intensity of tactical and tactical special training activities, including working out the tasks of combat duty, the field training of personnel and readiness for maneuverable actions of the PGRK missile regiments remain stable. The level of training for combat calculations of start-up, multi-axle chassis driver-mechanics allows you to perform assigned tasks with guarantee. This is confirmed by the results of inspections by the commissions of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, as well as the results of training of strategic nuclear forces under the leadership of the Supreme Commander.

The command of the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces checked the control of the formation, 17 percent of the missile divisions, 10 percent of the missile regiments and 17 percent of the military units. Allied commanders - 58 percent of missile divisions, involving 28 percent of rocket regiments and 54 percent of support and guard units. The commanders of the missile divisions for the year evaluated the 62 percent of the missile regiments and the 29 percent of the support and security units. All units and military units of the Strategic Missile Forces for the state of combat training received positive ratings.

Compared to the 2014 school year, the estimate was upgraded to five rocket regiments, four support and security units. These results are evidence of systematic organizational work for maintaining troop training.

- How many launches are done in 2015, how many are planned in 2016?


- In the 2015, the Strategic Missile Forces carried out seven missile launches: one - in the framework of the training session on the management of the Russian Armed Forces, two - for experimental testing of the combat equipment of strategic missiles, three - for testing missile systems and one - for the purpose of eliminating missiles with expired service and launch spacecraft.

"Sarmat" will replace the "Governor"

Andrei Sedykh collage (photo by ITAR-TASS)

In 2016, it is planned to conduct 16 launches, of which two - with the aim of extending the service life, 14 - testing, experimental development of developed missile systems, combat equipment of strategic missiles and for management training of the Armed Forces.

- How were the contracts for state defense order implemented in the interests of the Strategic Missile Forces? Did you manage to coordinate the positions of the Ministry of Defense and industry regarding the price of strategic missile systems?

- The state armament program for 2011 – 2020 years provides for a balanced set of measures to create advanced missile weapons, re-equip the Strategic Missile Forces with modern missile systems, maximize the use of the RK duty personnel, and create a scientific and technical reserve.

What has been done last year. Firstly, the modernization of the RK "Yars" mobile ground and stationary, with enhanced capabilities to overcome the existing and future missile defense systems. Secondly, the planned work on the creation of the newest stationary RK with a Sarmat heavy-class missile. Thirdly, a lot of attention is paid to maintaining the grouping by extending the service life of the HSRC that are on duty.

VVST supply plans for 2015 were fully met. More than 90 percent of orders in the interests of the Strategic Missile Forces are executed on long-term contracts. The state defense order provides for further development of the shock funds of the Strategic Missile Forces, with much planned to be done in 2016

As for the prices of products, they are determined in accordance with the calculations provided by enterprises - potential suppliers. The problem with pricing is completely exhausted.

- In your opinion, are Russian enterprises ready to produce in the required volume new missile systems, including those of a heavy class?

- In accordance with the Federal Target Program “Development of the Defense-Industrial Complex of the Russian Federation before 2020 of the Year”, industrial enterprises, planned to be the only suppliers of serial products, receive funding from the state budget for the preparation of production. These funds are used to build or repair industrial premises, purchase machinery and other equipment, and train personnel.

Thus, it is possible to speak with confidence about the readiness of domestic industry cooperation to create and supply in the required volumes to the troops of the Yars missile system and to complete the development work on the Sarmat complex.

I am pleased to note that at present the state tests of the Yars RK have been completed; it is recommended by decision of the state commission for adoption.

As for the rates of rearmament on the Yars, they correspond to the instructions of the president and range from four to five rocket regiments per year. This is quite enough to complete the reequipment of the Strategic Missile Forces in time and in time.

In December, we almost completed the combat duty of five missile regiments in the Tagil, Novosibirsk and Kozel formations. As planned, the troops received in accordance with the state defense order of the Yars missile of mobile ground and stationary bases. In 2016, five more regiments will be retrofitted to this complex. The rearmament of the Irkutsk and Yoshkar-Ola divisions will begin, and the Novosibirsk, Kozelsk and Nizhne-Tagil divisions will continue. Two dozen intercontinental ballistic missiles will enter these compounds.

Of course, such a high rate of re-equipment was achieved thanks to the use of ready-made infrastructure of positional divisions of PGRK missile divisions, which made it possible to significantly reduce the cost of putting the RV Yars into the strategic rocket forces grouping.

- What are the advantages of this complex?


- It has the properties that make it difficult for the enemy to solve the problem of countering: a reduced accelerating section of a rocket’s flight, significantly shorter in duration than that of previous generations, new body covers and other elements, a durable and lightweight design, powerful engines and control devices capable of operating significant overloads.



The new RK replaces the aging complexes with fourth-generation ICBMs — the single-block PC-12M Topol and the multiply charged PC-18 Stilette as their extended service life expires. In the near future, together with the Topol-M missile complex of the RS-12М2 missile complex Topol-M, the ICBR RS-24 of the PGRK Yars will be the basis of the Strategic Missile Forces grouping.

The commander-in-chief has set us the task: by the year of 2022, to bring the share of modern types of missile weapons to 100 percent. Today it is already 56 percent.

- What are the approximate characteristics of the promising Sarmat missile and how is it better than the RS-20В “Voevoda”?

- According to its weight and size characteristics, it is similar to its predecessor. But along with this, there will be new types of combat equipment, promising means of overcoming the enemy's missile defense. The most important thing is that the complex is being developed and will be manufactured at the enterprises of Russian cooperation. I will add that in April 2015, the president decided to suspend the conversion program Dnipro.

- Some experts say that the US missile defense system can level our nuclear missile potential in the event of war. Others - that even the missile defense system being created is unable to become a tangible threat to the Russian strategic nuclear forces in a retaliatory strike and retaliatory strike ...

- Estimations of experts show: the US missile defense system deployed for today, by its information and fire capabilities, is unable to withstand the massive use of the strategic missile forces grouping.

Analyzing the timetable for implementing the US missile defense concept outlined before 2020, the European Phased Adaptive Approach, I can say that it exceeds all previous projects in its scope and military strategic consequences. Already today, sea-based missile defense systems have been deployed in many regions of the world, forming the backbone of the future global missile defense system, a network of information and intelligence facilities and specialized points and control systems has been created, organizational and technical measures are being taken to link them into a single system. The current US administration has not cut a single anti-missile program outlined by this concept in 2009: neither the production of new information systems and extended-range interceptors, nor their delivery and deployment plans in key regions of the world. According to American estimates, the integration of different in purpose and characteristics of the means in the new missile defense system will allow organizing a multi-echelon protection system providing impact on space and air targets on any part of the trajectory. It is primarily about the defeat of our missiles and warheads.

Long-term plans for the development of the Strategic Missile Forces and strategic nuclear forces have already been adjusted to reflect the projected rate and scale of deployment of information and impact tools of this system.

The implementation of our plans involves the use of fundamentally new effective means and ways to overcome any missile defense. According to the plans approved by the political leadership of Russia for the development of strategic nuclear forces of the Strategic Missile Forces, they will maximally modernize their weapons, taking into account the parameters of the START Treaty. Creation of ICBMs with qualitatively new characteristics and equipping them with complexes of means for overcoming the anti-missile and air defense of the new generation will ensure that any potential threats are neutralized.

- What is the situation with automated combat control system? What will be its new look?

- The command and control system used in the mobile-based Yars RK provides a significant increase in the likelihood of bringing orders thanks to more advanced means of communication and the use of modern information and telecommunication technologies. This will allow the use of rocket complexes without limiting the distances when performing maneuverable actions and expanding the possibilities for choosing the routes of their combat patrols.

The use of new mobile control points ensures sustainable, continuous and operational management of nuclear weapons taking into account the peculiarities of the combat use of both existing and future strategic strategic forces in real time.

Equipping this ASBU with the re-equipped formations and military units of the Strategic Missile Forces makes it possible in the near future to begin upgrading stationary command and control centers. The new look of ASBU, the implementation of which is planned since 2016, is based on a promising integrated automated system. It will allow for the operational re-targeting of missiles, as well as solving the tasks of providing information and managing the daily activities of the Strategic Missile Forces. Orders will be transmitted via wire, radio and satellite communication channels, which have the required survivability and noise immunity.

Complexes of automation equipment promising integrated automated combat control system of the fifth generation are compact, low power consumption, improved algorithms for the closure of the transfer of information, increased resistance to external influences and reliability of operation.

ASUs of the fourth and fifth generations provide for bringing combat control orders directly to launchers, bypassing intermediate links, including under conditions of nuclear influence and electronic suppression.

- As you know, we began work on the creation of a new railway in Kazakhstan? What has already been done and does this cause irritation to our counter-partners?

- At present, the outline design has been completed, working design documentation for the units and systems of the complex is being prepared. In 2017, a report on the prospects for its deployment should be presented to the president.

I would emphasize that under the terms of the START Treaty, control in the field of nuclear weapons is carried out on a parity basis. Russia and the United States annually conduct 18 inspections to confirm the accuracy of the declared data on strategic offensive arms. Also used technical controls. The parties exchange data on the state of their strategic offensive arms (as of March 1 and September September 1). In 2015, RVSN objects were inspected 12 times.

- Is it possible to use the arsenal of the Strategic Missile Forces in non-nuclear equipment to attack the terrorists of the "Islamic state"?

- I do not see the need. Rational planning is that each object is assigned the means of destruction that is most effective.

The use of intercontinental ballistic missiles of the Strategic Missile Forces with any type of equipment is carried out under the sanction of the Supreme Commander. If a corresponding political decision is made, the Strategic Missile Forces are ready to perform any task.

- Does the Strategic Missile Forces receive equipment based on new physical principles?

- The Strategic Missile Forces have long professed the principle: everything new and promising, including the application of new physical principles that can serve to strengthen their existing capabilities, should be among the troops.

Machine engineering and disguise (MIOM) - one of the first in this series. Starting with 2012, MIOM enters the arsenal of the Teikov Rocket Division. Together with industrial enterprises, work is being carried out to modernize and expand the possibilities for engineering reconnaissance of patrol routes, preparing the terrain for field positions of mobile ground-based missile systems, and applying various camouflage measures. In the future, it is planned to supply the already upgraded machine to the Irkutsk and Novosibirsk missile formations of the Strategic Missile Forces.

Do not forget about another innovation in the interests of the Strategic Missile Forces - the machine for remote demining "Foliage". This model was created by the ROC "Yars" to increase the survivability and security of units PGRK on combat patrol routes and field positions, for demining sections of the routes of movement of columns of equipment.

In military conditions, an inspection was carried out of the combat effectiveness of the FAR "Foliage" for the destruction (neutralization) of mine-explosive devices (special assemblies of engineering ammunition). The first two vehicles have already been delivered to the Novosibirsk and Teikov missile formations.

- The relocation of the Peter the Great Military Academy of Strategic Missile Forces from Moscow to Balashikha did happen. How justified is this step?

- In accordance with the directive of the Minister of Defense 1 of September 2015, the redeployment of the Peter the Great Military Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces to Balashikha was completed to the funds of the liquidated Military Technical University. This was due to the urgent need for a deep modernization of the academy, including its educational material base and infrastructure necessary for the qualitative solution of the assigned tasks of training officer personnel.

Scientists and engineers of the country are actively conducting research and development of promising missile systems, which will be put into service before the 2020 year. In such conditions, the Strategic Missile Forces BA requires fundamentally different approaches to the training of highly qualified officers. The corresponding material base for this is created on the new funds of the Academy.

It is planned to build a new academic building with a total area of ​​about 42 thousand square meters, which will house the teaching and research staff of the academy. Specialized classes with educational-cutting samples of modern and promising RK and training facilities, simulators will be interconnected into a single system through the training center with access to the network of command and control command points of the regiment-connection-association. There will also be an academic library with a modern electronic access system and specialized pavilions with weapons and military equipment, with the possibility of working out individual elements of tasks for their intended purpose.

An administrative building (approximate total area - 8600 sq. M), a universal sports complex with three halls, a complex with a pool and an ice rink, a museum of rocket technology will also be built.

After the delivery of these objects in 2016 – 2017, the formation of the academy on new foundations will be finally completed, the quality of the educational process will change. Currently, it is positive that after the relocation of the university, the training system for the Strategic Missile Forces remained unchanged in quantitative terms (the academy prepares specialists for all the programs listed in the annex to the license). The level and quality of academic education, scientific and pedagogical potential saved.

The Strategic Missile Forces recognize the leading role of the academy in the training of officers and take all measures to preserve and enhance the achievements of their main university.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/28908
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pereira
    Pereira 27 January 2016 19: 32 New
    -53 qualifying.
    Sense of nuclear weapons, if they try to strangle us economically, and not by military means? I would rather read about the successes in import substitution and the restoration of machine tools.
    No, the improvement of technology is necessary, but it is better if it is possible to earn on this technique. Today it is extremely relevant.
    It would be good to equip the decommissioned poplars with an ordinary warhead and push the Hussites at a reasonable price. And run from somewhere in Africa. Type of military outsourcing.
    1. bort4145
      bort4145 27 January 2016 19: 36 New
      36
      So everyone should do their own thing, here the missile crews are coping. But economists do not hike winkbut hopefully correct.
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 27 January 2016 19: 40 New
        +5
        September 1, 2015 the redeployment of the Peter the Great Strategic Missile Forces Military Academy to Balashikha was completed
        It is interesting to whom and under what they will get (got, IN ADVANCE!) The squares and buildings of the Academy in Moscow ???
        History is silent!
        Probably, I hope, the government will correctly "dispose" of the tasty property in the center of Moscow!
        For the good of Russia, the Motherland, the people! hi laughing
        1. Pereira
          Pereira 27 January 2016 19: 42 New
          -23 qualifying.
          They already found new, larger pockets for dough on their pants.
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 28 January 2016 03: 43 New
            -1
            It turns out that effective managers who manage the squeezed property in Moscow have many defenders.
      2. Pereira
        Pereira 27 January 2016 19: 40 New
        +6
        Economists have nothing to do with it. Effective managers who think that they are able to manage the economy cannot cope.
      3. NIKNN
        NIKNN 27 January 2016 20: 03 New
        +6
        Quote: Pereira
        Sense of nuclear weapons, if they try to strangle us economically, and not by military means? I would rather read about success in import substitution. and restoration of machine tool industry.
        No, the improvement of technology is necessary, but it is better if it is possible to earn on this technique. Today it is extremely relevant.
        It would be good to equip the decommissioned poplars with an ordinary warhead and push the Hussites at a reasonable price. And run from somewhere in Africa. Type of military outsourcing.


        Read the full article, not the headlines ... request
        In accordance with the federal target program “Development of the Military-Industrial Complex of the Russian Federation until 2020”, industrial enterprises planned by the sole suppliers of serial production receive funding from the state budget for the preparation of production. These funds are used for the construction or repair of industrial premises, the purchase of machine tools and other equipment, and staff training.


        Most importantly, the complex is being developed and will be produced at the enterprises of Russian cooperation.
        1. Pereira
          Pereira 28 January 2016 03: 37 New
          -7
          Medium-sized machinery is good, but heavy in a coma, and the lung is dead. This missile alone is not extended. This is a drop in the ocean. So there is no reason for euphoria.
      4. Blondy
        Blondy 27 January 2016 23: 05 New
        +3
        Quote: bort4145
        So everyone should do their own thing, here the missile crews are coping. But economists do not hike, but I hope to improve.

        So rockets are very difficult to suspect of liberalism.
      5. magician
        magician 28 January 2016 01: 26 New
        +1
        You are right, everyone should do his own thing. In 94-96 in terms of combat readiness, units of the Strategic Missile Forces took the first place in combat readiness, having displaced the Airborne Forces from the eternal championship. And the times were not very telling, sn for 3-4 months delay, supply of quasi, etc. Nothing, they kept the nuclear shield.
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. JIaIIoTb
      JIaIIoTb 27 January 2016 19: 40 New
      +5
      We will not be able to defend ourselves, not by anything, not by what and not by whom it will produce.
      1. Pereira
        Pereira 27 January 2016 19: 43 New
        -18 qualifying.
        We will not restore the economy, there will be nothing to protect.
        1. DIVAN SOLDIER
          DIVAN SOLDIER 27 January 2016 19: 47 New
          -22 qualifying.
          What kind of economy? The USA has it, China has it, Germany has it. And with us they only watch when the barrel of oil is mocking!
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 27 January 2016 19: 53 New
            +5
            Our economy - mechanical engineering, machine tool industry, light industry, in short, everything that effective managers have ruined.
            1. olegfbi
              olegfbi 27 January 2016 20: 46 New
              +1
              Quote: Pereira
              Our economy is mechanical engineering, machine tool industry, light industry,

              Here it is all to restore and DEVELOP It is necessary !!!
              Because to you +!
              1. olegfbi
                olegfbi 27 January 2016 21: 23 New
                +1
                Forgive me Everything, in advance !!!
                I think the one who minus, to put it mildly, not an intelligent person!
                Give at least one reasonable argument against the development of mechanical engineering, machine tool industry and light industry in Russia and I will erase myself from the forum forever!
                1. 79807420129
                  79807420129 27 January 2016 21: 54 New
                  +8
                  Quote: olegfbi
                  Forgive me Everything, in advance !!!
                  I think the one who minus, to put it mildly, not an intelligent person!
                  Give at least one reasonable argument against the development of mechanical engineering, machine tool industry and light industry in Russia and I will erase myself from the forum forever!

                  Oleg, I didn’t minus you and I don’t know who minus you, but it’s not correct to call even minus a smart person, because someone likes, doesn't like, they express in this way, and develop, machine building, especially machine tool building, light industry of course it is necessary. Mr. Pereira was simply bombarded just not for what he thinks so, but for the stupidity that he wrote
                  1. olegfbi
                    olegfbi 27 January 2016 22: 26 New
                    +1
                    Totally agree with you!
                    +.
            2. heccrbq8
              heccrbq8 28 January 2016 19: 56 New
              0
              With this power of temporary workers and thieves, no economy can be restored.
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 27 January 2016 20: 22 New
            +5
            You are mistaken, not everyone is looking - whoever is doing the business.
    3. Tersky
      Tersky 27 January 2016 19: 51 New
      21
      Quote: Pereira
      The sense of nuclear weapons,

      If it weren’t for the nuclear weapons of Russia, you would now crumble the rock for the US metallurgical industry under the close supervision of the EU guard, this is the most optimistic option, the most pessimistic — they used a wooden jacket.
      1. Pereira
        Pereira 27 January 2016 20: 08 New
        -11 qualifying.
        No need to juggle. I did not say that nuclear weapons are not needed. I said that today the rearmament of the economy is more important than the rearmament of new missiles.
        1. tol100v
          tol100v 27 January 2016 20: 22 New
          11
          Judging by the profile picture, you don’t see half, and judging by the statements, you still don’t hear! No offense. But you probably don’t even know which side to approach the machines!
          1. Ami du peuple
            Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 21: 36 New
            +3
            Quote: Tol100v
            But you probably don’t even know which side to approach the machines!

            But he knows which side to approach the keyboard. To throw shit and arrange srach.
          2. Pereira
            Pereira 28 January 2016 02: 46 New
            -1
            How do I know? However, I saw a wooden loom in the museum of rural life. So I know that they approach the machine from the side.
        2. 79807420129
          79807420129 27 January 2016 20: 38 New
          16
          Quote: Pereira
          No need to juggle. I did not say that nuclear weapons are not needed. I said that today the rearmament of the economy is more important than the rearmament of new missiles.

          Oh, Mr. Pereira, who is not Negoro, I understand you, of course, although for the first time I’m reading your comments like Yaroslavna’s cry, say to sell the Hussites, you can sell it, but you can’t sell the chassis, the missile, the carriers are limited by the agreement on not to spread nuclear weapons Yes, there’s a small nuance, the economy is still there, now the truth is mostly tied to defense, you see now the war is still going on, hybrid, on foreign territories, but if it weren’t for nuclear weapons in Russia, then mattress would have been like Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan bombed Russia, and you can sell everything and Russia, including mattresses on the cheap for 5 lards; Ukraine bought everything there, but they don’t need Ukraine, but Russia. With respect, by the way, not my minuses. hi
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 28 January 2016 03: 01 New
            +1
            Dear, about Husitov was just banter. No one in their right mind would do that. Although, perhaps, the sale of a ballistic missile to a private army is legally not prohibited, because no one thought of banning it. But that is not the problem. Say Yaroslavna?
            And ur uriks about and for no reason you are not tired? Yes, for me. That is, modernization is good, but euphoria about this is inappropriate. And the article is precisely aimed at this - to add a spoonful of positive to the barrel of the oil-oriented economy, the stability of which has been lied to us in recent years.
            About the economy. Yes, there are many people working in the military-industrial complex who feed their families, but the military-industrial complex works for state funds and makes a profit in two cases - for export (but this does not apply to nuclear weapons) and for import substitution. In general, using a budget is a very big topic.

            As for the minuses, I extremely rarely value those with whom I personally discuss. I appreciate only other people's discussions. Probably you too.
            1. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 28 January 2016 03: 26 New
              +1
              Quote: Pereira
              And uriks ur with and without reason you are not tired

              Nothing new and unusual - once again they bring in the idea - guns instead of oil .. (the worse things are in the economy, the more launches of all kinds of things we'll see on TV) hi
        3. Tersky
          Tersky 27 January 2016 21: 19 New
          +4
          Quote: Pereira
          No need to juggle. I did not say that nuclear weapons are not needed

          Well, yes, of course not you ... yes
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 28 January 2016 02: 52 New
            0
            I will formulate the problem. Against the backdrop of the catastrophic failure of the government with its innovative economy and the widely publicized import substitution, which, it turns out, is not there. The message on the modernization of nuclear weapons, which in itself did not increase security, is, firstly, a positive distraction from economic problems, and secondly, this is the legacy of the fat years. I’m not sure that the development of nuclear weapons in the current situation will continue at the same pace.
            And if you suspected me of wanting to get rid of expensive weapons, you confused me with a liberalist.
        4. An64
          An64 28 January 2016 10: 34 New
          0
          I said that today the rearmament of the economy is more important than the rearmament of new missiles.

          it’s not clear why they minus Pereira ...
          As far as the rearmament of the Strategic Missile Forces is concerned, in recent years the Topol, Topol-M and Yars missile systems have been created and put into service. "Sarmat" and BZHRK are created.
          Our main "opponents" have one "Minuteman" since 1970 ... and they do not plan to replace him, at least until 2020. The same is with the SLBM - "Trident-2" since 1990 and will serve for another 15 years.
          Why do not we modernize existing complexes, but constantly create new ones. After all, this is different money, completely different, different orders of magnitude ...
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 28 January 2016 13: 31 New
            +1
            Well, Poplar-M is a modernized poplar, and Yars is a modernized Poplar-M. And how do you order to modernize the governor, whose production is located in Ukraine? Therefore, Sarmat create. And on the same BZHRK will stand the same Yars and Frontiers. If I do not confuse anything.
        5. NEXUS
          NEXUS 28 January 2016 11: 24 New
          +1
          Quote: Pereira
          No need to juggle. I did not say that nuclear weapons are not needed. I said that today the rearmament of the economy is more important than the rearmament of new missiles.

          The development of the Strategic Missile Forces, the airborne forces, the navy and the ground component of our army, as well as the development of the NATO military forces, this is the Cold War, and, more precisely, one of its moments, maybe there is also an economic confrontation, both informational and political. and somewhere around us. Now, for now, in the economy the advantage is on the side of the adversary.
          But at the same time, much is being done to counter new threats not only in the military sphere, but also in the economic, industrial (import substitution), and political (expansion of spheres of influence).
          And to sit and yell: All thieves!, You don’t need a lot of intelligence. They are enough everywhere and Russia is no exception.
      2. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 27 January 2016 20: 11 New
        -19 qualifying.
        Here and no one will wave Kyle, everyone will die out from such a policy. Oh yes, the only demographic increase was and that was associated with the annexation of Crimea.
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 27 January 2016 21: 32 New
          +6
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          Here and no one will wave Kyle, everyone will die out from such a policy.

          Yeah ... again about prosralipolymers yes, shavers even 300 years predicted the extinction and collapse of Russia, but we see the opposite, well, at least look at this resource Made by us
        2. Muvka
          Muvka 28 January 2016 15: 20 New
          +1
          From 2010 to 2014, the increase was 800 thousand people. This year, an increase of 250 thousand people. This is without the Crimea.
    4. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 27 January 2016 20: 14 New
      +2
      There will be no success in the economy as long as this very economy is ruled by those who have one concept of "buy and sell." And the decommissioned poplars are needed to develop the domestic missile defense system. By the way, machine-tool production was launched in the Volga region with a capacity of one and a half machines per month ... .But reported .. People talk about the impossibility of "Maidan" in Russia, I think that this is not entirely true .. A couple of years of such "industrialization" and people will smash the government brick by brick ...
      Quote: Pereira
      Sense of nuclear weapons, if they try to strangle us economically, and not by military means? I would rather read about the successes in import substitution and the restoration of machine tools.
      No, the improvement of technology is necessary, but it is better if it is possible to earn on this technique. Today it is extremely relevant.
      It would be good to equip the decommissioned poplars with an ordinary warhead and push the Hussites at a reasonable price. And run from somewhere in Africa. Type of military outsourcing.
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 27 January 2016 20: 25 New
        -3
        But in the government they scold the planned Soviet economy, at the expense of it they themselves filled their pockets, sold out, destroyed everything. But they built shopping centers, churches, and SKOLKOVO with its "fantastic achievements"!
    5. olegfbi
      olegfbi 27 January 2016 20: 57 New
      +4
      Quote: Pereira
      It would be good to equip the decommissioned poplars with an ordinary warhead and push the Hussites at a reasonable price. And run from somewhere in Africa. Type of military outsourcing

      Just crazy nonsense!

      Quote: Pereira
      Sense of nuclear weapons, if they try to strangle us economically, and not by military means?

      Another nonsense!

      Quote: Pereira
      I would rather read about the successes in import substitution and the restoration of machine tools.

      Here I AGREE 100% !!!

      But in fact, there is such an opinion: In the civilian sphere, you can ride on any cars, fly on vacation on any aircraft, watch any TV ..., BUT! It is NECESSARY to fight on your tanks, planes ..., to eat your own food in wartime ... Fortunately, for now, Russia is getting it !!!
    6. opus
      opus 27 January 2016 21: 26 New
      +2
      Quote: Pereira
      Sense of nuclear weapons, if they try to strangle us economically, and not by military means? I'd rather read

      Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Colonel General Sergey Karakaev ...
      It is unlikely that this will be broadcast.
      It is necessary to them

      and the author of the article (about successes in import substitution) must not be Sergey Karakaev, Oleg Falichev,and the writer is Dude

      (he will chew everything for you and predict both about $ and about oil and about "ARTISTIC WORD")

      Quote: Pereira
      It would be good to equip the decommissioned poplars with an ordinary warhead and push the Hussites at a reasonable price.


      What to do with MTCR?



      ---------------------------------
      After all, they will then take and sell the MinutesmenUkraine ending their term.
      And besides the minutemans, their persings are not completely utilized, pieces of 30 MX, Tridents 1, in my opinion, are suitable for the Navy "non-deposit" ...
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 28 January 2016 06: 49 New
        0
        Quote: opus
        After all, they will then take and sell the MinutesmenUkraine ending their term.

        They won’t transmit, because they know a passion for resale, suddenly they - Minutemans will come up somewhere in the Middle East :-) Or in North Korea
        1. opus
          opus 28 January 2016 12: 52 New
          0
          Quote: sa-ag
          They won’t pass, because they know a passion for resale, suddenly they -

          1.Well, it’s very easy to control (Minuteman is not Stinger).
          They can "sell" not only to Ukraine, the MTCR also includes Germany and Poland and Lithuania and Latvia and Estonia, Norway, Sweden, Japan, South Korea.
          2.Well, Husits ​​(
          Quote: Pereira
          at a reasonable price to the Hussites.
          ) Do you think you do not have a passion for resale? Well, not funny.
          After the Hussites, poplars will emerge in the same Ukraine
    7. Stas157
      Stas157 27 January 2016 21: 37 New
      +2
      Sense of nuclear weapons, if they try to strangle us economically, and not by military means?

      So because they want it economically, by military means too tough! And if there were no triad of nuclear weapons, then without any sanctions they would have thrown Tamagavkas!
    8. petalvas
      petalvas 27 January 2016 22: 37 New
      0
      On "import substitution and machine-tool building" you, obviously, have the wrong address.
      You may be interested in the blindfold not on one but on both eyes.
    9. aviator_IAS
      aviator_IAS 27 January 2016 23: 31 New
      +1
      There would be no nuclear weapons, with economic strangulation they would not even bother.
    10. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 28 January 2016 00: 44 New
      0
      And the backward US over the past 26 years has not even designed more than one page of a rocket !! And the 50-year-old rusty trash rusted through!
    11. Nitarius
      Nitarius 28 January 2016 06: 06 New
      0
      That’s why they are trying economically because nuclear weapons do not allow directly affecting either in Yugoslavia or Libya. So throw these illusions .. while it is .. We can economically survive .. let it not be right away, and it will be difficult .. there that REMOVE PINK GLASSES!
    12. theadenter
      theadenter 28 January 2016 06: 43 New
      0
      It would be good to equip the decommissioned poplars with an ordinary warhead and push the Hussites at a reasonable price. And run from somewhere in Africa.

      In no case impossible. I am more than sure that the rocket flight algorithms and the physical parameters of its systems of protection against electromagnetic radiation and anti-missile defense systems should not fall into third parties.

      As for economic asphyxiation, import substitution in certain sectors is not so fast, but it is happening. For faster - you need money, which is barely enough.
    13. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 28 January 2016 07: 01 New
      -1
      shefff mustache gone, mustache shefff!

    14. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 28 January 2016 08: 49 New
      0
      there will be no nuclear shield and other weapons - we will no longer need import substitution, there will be nothing to replace ....
  2. Evgesh91
    Evgesh91 27 January 2016 19: 33 New
    +2
    All of this, of course, is pleasing, only from the officialness of the narrative I almost fell asleep smile
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 27 January 2016 19: 37 New
    +2
    - What are the approximate characteristics of the promising Sarmat missile and how is it better than the RS-20В “Voevoda”?
    - In terms of its overall dimensions, it is similar to its predecessor.

    Will the mass of Sarmatia be 211,4 tons like the Voivode’s? It seems that it was said before that the mass of Sarmatia will be about 100 tons.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Markiz_A
      Markiz_A 27 January 2016 19: 50 New
      -5
      He has bad math, you don’t blame him for that, he’s a general, why is he to him?
    3. dvina71
      dvina71 27 January 2016 19: 50 New
      0
      .
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      Will the mass of Sarmatia be 211,4 tons like that of the Voivode?

      He meant payload, not total weight.
      1. kil 31
        kil 31 27 January 2016 20: 02 New
        +1
        And in fig 2 starts, one is enough. If it succeeds, then the missiles will be extended for 10 years. Why spend another rocket capable of being on duty for another 10 years, it is not worth a penny and is done in less than five minutes.
        In 2016, it is planned to carry out 16 launches, of which two - with the aim of extending the service life,
        1. Pilat2009
          Pilat2009 27 January 2016 21: 04 New
          0
          Quote: keel 31
          And in fig 2 starts, one is enough. If it succeeds, then the missiles will be extended, say 10 years

          In general, such an extension is doubtful, what if, in a year, the contacts are oxidized to the end?
          1. kil 31
            kil 31 27 January 2016 21: 28 New
            +1
            Quote: Pilat2009
            Quote: keel 31
            And in fig 2 starts, one is enough. If it succeeds, then the missiles will be extended, say 10 years

            In general, such an extension is doubtful, what if, in a year, the contacts are oxidized to the end?

            As for contacts, no start-ups are needed, you can simply determine by storage conditions. And if you make 2 starts, will the contacts oxidize a few years later? They should decide this already according to storage conditions after 5 years, 10, 15. And here the second launch, let's make 15. Let's kill 15 missiles and draw the same conclusion as with one launch.
            1. nazar_0753
              nazar_0753 27 January 2016 23: 26 New
              0
              Quote: Kil 31
              Quote: Pilat2009
              Quote: keel 31
              And in fig 2 starts, one is enough. If it succeeds, then the missiles will be extended, say 10 years

              In general, such an extension is doubtful, what if, in a year, the contacts are oxidized to the end?

              As for contacts, no start-ups are needed, you can simply determine by storage conditions. And if you make 2 starts, will the contacts oxidize a few years later? They should decide this already according to storage conditions after 5 years, 10, 15. And here the second launch, let's make 15. Let's kill 15 missiles and draw the same conclusion as with one launch.

              Let's imagine for a moment that there will be two launches because they will launch missiles of different types ... For example, "Topol" and "Stiletto"
      2. kil 31
        kil 31 27 January 2016 21: 37 New
        +1
        Quote: dvina71
        .
        Quote: Lt. air force reserve
        Will the mass of Sarmatia be 211,4 tons like that of the Voivode?

        He meant payload, not total weight.

        Payload 211 tons? Well, what kind of media is needed? NASA and ROSCOSMOS only dream of such people, others do not even try to dream.
        1. just exp
          just exp 27 January 2016 21: 45 New
          +1
          211 tons it was the total mass of Voivode with PN.
          1. Tersky
            Tersky 27 January 2016 22: 02 New
            +3
            Quote: just explo
            211 tons it was the total mass of Voivode with PN.

            Exactly, the 210-ton Satan (Voivode) is a heavy rocket. The Sarmat weighs half as much.
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 28 January 2016 15: 28 New
              +1
              From Wikipedia:
              Device and performance characteristics [edit | edit wiki text]
              Weight - 210 tons.

              The missile is designed to deliver 10 warheads with a capacity of 750 Kt each. [3]

              2-stage missile with a block for breeding warheads. Liquid rocket engines of both stages are “sunk” into the fuel tank, fuel tanks - bearing with combined dividing bottoms.
    4. Tersky
      Tersky 27 January 2016 21: 59 New
      +4
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      Will the mass of Sarmatia be 211,4 tons like the Voivode’s? It seems that it was said before that the mass of Sarmatia will be about 100 tons.

      Read here "Sarmat" (rocket): characteristics and photos. not details, of course, but the general idea is quite voluminous, hi
  5. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 27 January 2016 19: 59 New
    +1
    For our "sworn friends" we will create a super-heavy rocket with the sonorous name "krants" !!!!!
  6. oxotnuk86
    oxotnuk86 27 January 2016 20: 21 New
    0
    "Lt. Air Force Reserve." How curious we are, give reliable facts and indicate sources. Dying appetite for information is expensive.
  7. pogranicnik
    pogranicnik 27 January 2016 20: 23 New
    +1
    In general, you can sleep peacefully !!!!
  8. tol100v
    tol100v 27 January 2016 20: 25 New
    +1
    But for me, you do not need to replace, but ADD!
  9. sabakina
    sabakina 27 January 2016 20: 52 New
    +4
    And I'm used to "Voevode". The rocket is proven, reliable ... Maybe I'm getting old? ... recourse
  10. valent45
    valent45 27 January 2016 21: 00 New
    +2
    Something RK railway-based is delayed. These RKs have already been.
    Design time should be.
    1. nazar_0753
      nazar_0753 27 January 2016 23: 26 New
      +1
      But wasn’t a rather heavy part of the development of the past BZHRK carried out in Ukraine?
  11. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 27 January 2016 21: 03 New
    +1
    Quote: Pereira
    No need to juggle. I did not say that nuclear weapons are not needed. I said that today the rearmament of the economy is more important than the rearmament of new missiles.


    And the economy is also important. But without nuclear weapons tomorrow our economy will already feed someone else who has nuclear weapons, or the army will simply be stronger.
    1. Yak28
      Yak28 27 January 2016 21: 30 New
      +3
      The USSR had a bunch of nuclear missiles and the army was many times superior to the current one. So everyone knows, without a war and a single shot the USSR fell apart, production was destroyed, hundreds of military aircraft, ships, missiles, various new weapons were sent to scrap. Hitler together with NATO did not have done as much harm to Russia as our greedy politicians for money and power.
  12. Chukcha
    Chukcha 27 January 2016 21: 21 New
    0
    I was suddenly struck by the thought that the United States and Russia have different schools in their approach to carriers of nuclear weapons. And I believe that our school is stronger. This can be seen even in such "trifles" as air defense. Well, no one has analogues of the S-300-400, and the 500th being developed.
  13. Yak28
    Yak28 27 January 2016 21: 36 New
    +1
    Quote: Chukcha
    I was suddenly struck by the thought that the United States and Russia have different schools in their approach to carriers of nuclear weapons. And I believe that our school is stronger. This can be seen even in such "trifles" as air defense. Well, no one has analogues of the S-300-400, and the 500th being developed.
    It is not known whether there are any analogues or not, and how our complexes will not show themselves in a real battle with a serious adversary with electronic warfare is not clear whether mobile missile systems are so good and invulnerable, unlike mine, sea-based
  14. Old26
    Old26 27 January 2016 21: 39 New
    0
    Quote: dvina71
    He meant payload, not total weight.

    Yah? He said
    In terms of its overall dimensions, it is similar to its predecessor.

    By weight and size, not by throw weight. For ten years they have been talking about a 100-ton-class rocket, and now suddenly it becomes similar in weight and size characteristics to the Voyevoda

    Quote: valent45
    Something RK railway-based is delayed. These RKs have already been. Design time should be.

    And to re-create the infrastructure, create or reconstruct field positions, create rolling stock — this takes time.

    Quote: keel 31
    And in fig 2 starts, one is enough. If it succeeds, then the missiles will be extended for 10 years.

    That is, you propose to launch one rocket and extend the service life by 10 years? Which one do you prefer? Launch Voevoda and extend its service life and Topol's service life by 10 years? Or vice versa? Launch "Topol" and at the same time extend the service life of "Voevoda"? Or maybe they should launch two?
  15. Old26
    Old26 27 January 2016 22: 16 New
    0
    Quote: Tol100v
    But for me, you do not need to replace, but ADD!

    Yeah. Extend operation for another 40 years and toss a coin before each launch. Explode or not
  16. Prokrust
    Prokrust 27 January 2016 22: 18 New
    0
    At present, it is positive that after the redeployment of the university, the personnel training system for the Strategic Missile Forces remained unchanged in quantitative terms (the Academy trains specialists in all programs specified in the appendix to the license). The level and quality of academic education, scientific and pedagogical potential are preserved.

    But the thinned scientific and teaching staff of the academy does not think so. Why there ... Years (days) will pass - new professors and doctors will be done in Balashikha ... fellow
  17. Kostya Andreev
    Kostya Andreev 27 January 2016 22: 32 New
    0
    I set the cons, maybe I'm not a smart person, but I understand that the presence of nuclear weapons makes the country independent, and it is difficult to democratize it.
    Regarding the import substitution of machine tools, mechanical engineering, light industry, etc., etc. I propose to go to the car and see what it is made of, how many units, sensors are in it, and this should be done in Russia in a year? then I propose to produce FULLY washing machines, computers, medical equipment and so on and so forth. after that I say, in order to produce this you need machine tools, do you propose to make them yourself? And you represent a modern multi-operational turning milling drilling machine. Remove the cover and see how many there are. You offer to produce it in a year in Russia! but in order to produce this you need equipment and the circle went again!
    A person who thinks that this can be done quickly or is either a provocateur, but most likely a sofa analyte and expert.
    Thank Putin for not letting Western companies into Russia on their terms. because if they go in then I will suck the chupa chups !!!
  18. Stas 86
    Stas 86 27 January 2016 22: 57 New
    0
    "Sarmat" will replace the "Governor"

    I put a minus to the article, since it is still not called, that is, there is no official name for it yet!
    I only know that this is a heavy load as the R-36M.
  19. Yuri VO
    Yuri VO 27 January 2016 23: 00 New
    +1
    Writer and soldier, what do you have in common? It happens that they scribble. Writers in letters, soldiers in bullets. The letters form strings and bullets too. And those and others sometimes make whole works. And only on the writer and the soldier depends on how these works will sound. The results of the works are different.
    1. Stas 86
      Stas 86 27 January 2016 23: 05 New
      0
      I still tend to the creator of this work, let it be followed by a name.
  20. sery volk
    sery volk 27 January 2016 23: 16 New
    -1
    the guarantee of Russia was clear, in my opinion the leader of Pakistan, Zia-ul-Haq, once said, the Pakistanis will eat grass but we must have nuclear weapons. So, there is no more important task than the development of our strategic missile forces, spit on iPhones, Turkey and the Maldives, everything for the strategic missile forces everything for the victory
  21. Zomanus
    Zomanus 28 January 2016 00: 20 New
    0
    Well, I liked the article. Everything is brief and to the point.
    Sarmatians do, Barguzin will soon begin to do.
    Old missiles are launched, new ones are made.
    In short, from this side all the rules.
    It turns out that we only have marine affairs limping on all limbs.
  22. jonht
    jonht 28 January 2016 02: 26 New
    0
    Dear, do you seriously think that missiles collect equipment without machine tools and equipment? The components are taken from the air, and the materials are from gov * a? Maybe we do not have the drug that was in the USSR, but there are many small enterprises that produce clothes and shoes and bedding and much more. In addition to the tanks, the same Chelyabinsk tractor produces cars, locomotives and the same tractors. Russian equipment, both machine-tool and specialized, is the same, but it is still not available in much, they are used to buying more and more over the hill ... Yes, the military-industrial complex, as in the USSR, is now the main driver of our industry, so for me it is better than Chinese or US industry. And stop whining, it's time to roll up your sleeves and work.
  23. Neko75
    Neko75 28 January 2016 03: 38 New
    0
    Someone here wrote that strategic nuclear forces are not as important as economic development. So can write only a liberal or someone who all .... yu (can be in one person). Without the possibility of protecting interests, Russia would long ago be divided into parts and would impose its will. There would be controlled territories, raw materials appendages. The defense industry has always been an engine of progress and believe me, their machines are already being produced, control systems began to make their own a year ago, on their software, they restored and loaded a bunch of enterprises with work. There are no modern strategic nuclear forces, there will be no independence and, as a consequence, no economy. Restore in stages, but not all at once. And it comes to economics. The defense industry, as a segment of the economy, has already earned.
  24. Moore
    Moore 28 January 2016 05: 11 New
    0
    The interview is purely official, and what else can you expect from the Commander?
    Everything is beautiful, everything is in order.
    Not to talk about rabid abuse during rearmament?
    Not the same as, for example, there is still the concept of "painted in the wrong color" and the structures are repainted in a color pleasing to the eye of the chief due to the next object being introduced?