Military Review

Caution: humanism

67
The spiritual base for the destruction of the state and society has already been created


Humanistic fundamentalism carries a far greater threat to the national security of any state than Islamic fundamentalism or any other. The modern mutation of humanism is a spiritual tool for establishing world domination of Western TNCs.

Since 70-ies of the XX century, the concept of “humanism” has begun to associate activity, which essentially has little to do with humanity, charity, love of neighbor. Under this banner, military operations began to be carried out, entailing huge civilian casualties, large-scale destruction of economies, poverty and hunger for the surviving inhabitants.

Strange Transformation


Did such a strange transformation just happen with humanism? Of course not. History shows that almost any philosophical doctrine aimed at improving the life of society, proclaiming the benefit of a person as its goal, at one or another stage of development, was turned by efforts of adepts into its opposite. Suffice it to recall Catholicism. Crusades with monstrous reprisals against the inhabitants of the captured cities, the Inquisition with hundreds of thousands of burned alive, completely destroyed the indigenous peoples of America - not a complete list of the "feats" of the Roman Church and all "in the name of Christ." Does the Son of God call people to this? Not. He called upon the pastoral to convert the nations into the true faith. So did the apostles. However, their heirs pastoral word replaced the sword. The same path was made by the idea of ​​humanism - from philanthropy, charity, love for one’s neighbor to humanitarian operations.

Mutation roots


As a rule, social confrontation is conducted using all the basic methods, which can be divided into three main groups: informational, economic, forceful. I will not dwell on the last two, since they do not relate to our topic. Many methods of struggle in the information sphere can also be divided into three main groups: ideological, religious, scientific, technological, ethnocultural.

The last two are aimed mainly at achieving scientific and technical superiority, as well as at the formation of the ethnic and cultural foundations of the struggle (requirements, goals, objectives, etc.). The spiritual content of the social confrontation determines the collision in the ideological and religious sphere, that is, the ideological foundations of the opposing communities - states, social classes and groups. Experience shows that the ideological and religious sphere has a decisive influence on the course and outcome of the war. Those parties whose spiritual potential is higher, even yielding to the enemy in the number of personnel and their training, the quantity and quality of weapons and military equipment, have every chance of success. Examples abound. The poorly armed and insufficiently organized mojaheds of Afghanistan actually force NATO to leave their country. The same was achieved by the national liberation forces of Iraq. One explanation: a decisive spiritual superiority over the enemy.

From protest to Protestantism


In order for a system to become a spiritual foundation of a sufficiently massive unification of people, it must meet several requirements.

First, be simple, understandable to a significant part of the audience, which is addressed.

Secondly, give hope for the best. If we are talking about secular ideologies (humanism is one of them), then they should proclaim ideals, the achievement of which promises significant positive changes to a significant part of the population.

Thirdly, to offer a set of principles for achieving a better life that are understandable to ordinary people.

Fourthly, to have sufficient “modernization potential” in order to adapt to the interests of various social groups. The absence of such will inevitably turn adherents into a highly influential sect.

Fifth, to give a clear classification system: what is good and what is bad.

An important factor in the success of an ideological system is its relevance to the dominant economic model in society, which determines the social order. This is a key condition for stability. Inconsistency turns the ideological system into a powerful tool for the destruction of this system.

By changing or rebuilding ideological and even religious systems under the dominant economic order, conformity is achieved. A striking example is the appearance of Protestantism. It, if we discard the external and ritual aspects, served as a religious justification for the emergence of large and medium-sized capital, especially banking, usurious. Conversely, the dominance of socialist ideas in Russian society at the beginning of the 20th century led to the collapse of capitalism in our country.

Today, humanism as a theory and practice most fully meets the listed requirements. That is why, in fact, the atheistic West has made it the spiritual basis of its policy - both internal and external. But practice has become the opposite of theoretical humanism, at least in the form in which the founding fathers formed the foundations of the latter.

Suicide care


The basic position of the humanistic worldview is the recognition of man as the highest value in relation to all others: material, spiritual, natural or social.

The humanist feels part of all humanity Ideally, it is not bound by national or other frameworks. This implies a close connection between humanism and liberalism, which proclaims freedom as the highest value of life. The first can not be implemented without the second and vice versa.

Caution: humanismThe main document of modern humanism is the Humanist Manifesto-2000. Focus on the most important aspects that determine its social impact.

In the matter of building a future society, modern humanists are unambiguously for a single global society with the rejection of states in the modern sense. A world parliament with legislative authority is envisioned. The basis of the global legal system should be a stronger world court with real means of ensuring its governance (that is, superior in this respect to today's Hague Tribunal and the Strasbourg Court of Human Rights).

The manifesto states that “it’s time to introduce a new way of identifying a person - belonging to the world community”. In essence, the authors of the document take the position of denial of the state as a relic of the past. “The de facto political boundaries of the world are arbitrary. We cannot reckon with them ... we are obliged to expand the circle of universal transnational rights of all members of the world community. " The attitude to the distinctive, ethnocultural is appropriate: "... we should be careful not to overemphasize national cultural characteristics." "Ethnic groups are the product of past social and geographical isolation, more uncharacteristic of the open world community."

That is, the division of peoples according to ethnicity is outdated and it is time to cancel it. From these provisions the concept of multiculturalism has grown. It has already put the countries of Western Europe on the brink of a demographic crisis, fraught with social explosions. Today, even leading European politicians, such as German Chancellor Merkel, are forced to admit the collapse of this concept.

At the same time, the manifesto argues that in addition to the existing responsibilities to society, everyone should be aware of the responsibility "for those who are outside the borders of our state." "It is necessary to continue to stand on the defense of democratic changes in various countries of the world community."

Guided by these postulates, the US and NATO have repeatedly “cared” for people outside their borders, supporting “democratic forces” in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Obviously, in order to expand opportunities for such good deeds, modern humanists demand in their manifesto the termination of the right of veto in the UN Security Council.

Their views on moral principles established in society are interesting. They "should not be based on inherited prescientific concepts that do not address the global, altered future." “Humanistic ethics are aimed at maximizing the freedom of choice: it is ... the right of each person to his own way of life, extending so far away as it does not harm others. Humanists approve of a variety of moral views and human values. ” The question arises: is it possible to build a stable society, where there are different ideas about good and evil? Obviously not. And the collapse of the concept of multiculturalism is another confirmation of this.

That is, the modern mutation of humanism actually creates a spiritual basis for the destruction of society as an integral system, turning it into a sum of individuals with different morals and principles of life, often incompatible.

According to modern humanists, “no one should be subjected to discrimination on the basis of ... sexual orientation. Couples of the same sex should have the same rights as heterosexuals. ”

“Many religious and political groups prevent the spread of contraceptives or the financing of programs aimed at reducing the birth rate and limiting population growth. As a result, economic development and the fight against poverty are slowing down, ”says Humanist Manifesto-2000. That is, the task of reducing the population of the Earth is openly posed.

The position of modern humanists in the development of science is also very dangerous. In fact, they require the abandonment of any kind of public control over the direction of technical progress, the application of new developments, including those that may pose a serious threat. Thus, the manifesto states that "humanists strongly oppose attempts to restrain technological developments, subject research results to censorship or deliberately restrict their scope."

In addition to the above, it is worthwhile to add that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is also rejected, which "is fading into the background everywhere in the world."

The analysis carried out clearly shows that the modern model of humanism is anti-human. It is aimed at the destruction of all the foundations of modern society from top to bottom - from the state to the family.

The provisions of the Humanist Manifesto-2000 create the ideological basis for the formation of a global society, where the dictatorship of TNCs will replace the power of national governments. Because after the destruction of states, only they will remain the only force that determines the development of society.

Humanistic fundamentalism is especially dangerous for multinational Russia, a country with established traditions. Measures to counter it - the key task of ensuring our security.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/28924
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sasha75
    Sasha75 27 January 2016 17: 31 New
    13
    It is different for everyone.
    1. hrych
      hrych 27 January 2016 17: 36 New
      29
      Differently...
      1. nils
        nils 27 January 2016 18: 03 New
        +6
        Quote: "The basic provision of the humanistic worldview is the recognition of a person as the highest value in relation to all others: material, spiritual, natural or social."

        Over this dark crowd
        Unwakened people
        Will you come up when freedom
        Will your golden ray shine?

        Your ray will shine and revive
        And the dream will disperse the mists ...
        But old rotten wounds
        Scars of violence and resentment

        Corruption of souls and emptiness
        What gnaws the mind and achs in the heart ...
        Who will cure them, who will cover them? -
        You, the robe of pure Christ ...

        FI Tyutchev
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 27 January 2016 20: 09 New
          11
          Great and relevant article!
          It is a pity that with such extremely important explanatory articles, Russian (Soviet) society and philosophical education were at least 40 years late. Moreover, the liberal "Yakovlevs" with the transnational market leader M. Gorbachev in this matter of the "humanitarian" reformatting of Soviet society with their so-called n. "new thinking" tried very significantly to transfer the USSR on a capitalist track. And now their successors and followers of liberal "humanism" - transnational "market people" - remain in Russia in a decaying political favor.

          To author +
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Nikolay K
            Nikolay K 27 January 2016 23: 18 New
            -4
            It turns out that this is humanism to blame for everything, a little shriveled reptile. Those. according to the author, humanity is to blame for human troubles.
            Stop clinging to concepts, it’s not the terms that are to blame, but the people who are doing their dirty work. Article minus.
            1. anykin
              anykin 28 January 2016 11: 19 New
              0
              Western manipulators elementary grab value concepts and try to fill them with different content, and people either follow a carrot that doesn’t taste good, but seems to have compromised the initial meaning. Understanding of values ​​should be won and not merged. There is no modern model of humanism. There are manipulations with our values.
              1. Nikolay K
                Nikolay K 28 January 2016 13: 49 New
                0
                Do not worry, we also have enough manipulators of concepts. Therefore, I say, it is not the term that is important, but the factual circumstances that describe it.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. NIKNN
          NIKNN 27 January 2016 20: 19 New
          +3
          But I agree - the articles on the site are now more news than specialized, as (in my opinion) should be on such a resource.


          These are puppets of the United States, as well as the UN, OSCE, PACE and are designed to fulfill orders from the owners and pressure on objectionable ... request
  2. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 17: 33 New
    +8
    the close connection of humanism and liberalism, proclaiming freedom the highest value of life

    Indeed, I noticed that when you discuss with liberal-oriented citizens, they put in the first place in the priority of values ​​some kind of abstract "freedom", which we, in Russia, allegedly badly lack. At the same time, they cannot give a clear definition of this term. Even our liberal prime minister and leader of the ruling party doesn't really understand what it is. smile
    1. poquello
      poquello 27 January 2016 17: 47 New
      +7
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      the close connection of humanism and liberalism, proclaiming freedom the highest value of life

      Indeed, I noticed that when you discuss with liberal-oriented citizens, they put in the first place in the priority of values ​​some kind of abstract "freedom", which we, in Russia, allegedly badly lack. At the same time, they cannot give a clear definition of this term. Even our liberal prime minister and leader of the ruling party doesn't really understand what it is. smile

      Elementary - I smoke, leave me this freedom if I do not interfere with others. By the way, the “freedom fighters” could not explain specifically what freedoms in Russia are lacking.
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 27 January 2016 18: 09 New
        +7
        In Russia, the liberals lack the main thing ... Permissiveness. I want to dry out .. I want to mess around .. I’ll give money for this ..
        1. varov14
          varov14 27 January 2016 20: 15 New
          +4
          What are you, what are you, our liberalism of permissiveness is higher than the roof, but thanks to permissiveness, popular recognition and reverence for it has disappeared. They began to correlate it with shit.mom, but after all, initially it was not at all what time does? All the postulates of former philosophers collapse and turn into the exact opposite.
      2. varov14
        varov14 27 January 2016 20: 03 New
        +2
        They couldn’t explain this one thing, but what they don’t understand is your omission, you had to put your fist in your face and here it is the clear clarity of freedom in terms of humanism and moral permissiveness.
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 21: 23 New
          +2
          Quote: varov14
          then your omission, it was necessary to put a fist in the face and here it is the clear clarity of freedom in terms of humanism and moral permissiveness
          1. DPG
            DPG 27 January 2016 23: 33 New
            +1
            But how you are castrated for the sake of a humane attitude to the owners at the end of February, you will immediately understand where he is the same humanism and for whom he is a priority. You live, but we won’t let you and your relatives mark the territory!
      3. aleksey980
        aleksey980 27 January 2016 22: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: poquello
        if I do not bother others

        Here is all the salt in this phrase! And these "fighters" mean absolute rights for themselves, but without a shadow of duties and responsibilities. Anarchy is NOT Liberty! Rights without obligations = anarchy = unfreedom for everyone who is not a "scumbag" and does not have sufficient strength.
      4. fennekRUS
        fennekRUS 28 January 2016 01: 08 New
        +1
        Quote: poquello
        By the way, the “freedom fighters” could not explain specifically what freedoms in Russia are lacking.

        carve in granite!
    2. andrew42
      andrew42 27 January 2016 18: 38 New
      +7
      Freedom (from responsibility) is better than non-freedom (from responsibilities). - I just "accidentally" dropped a few words.
  3. venaya
    venaya 27 January 2016 17: 34 New
    +2
    almost any philosophical doctrine aimed at improving the life of society, proclaiming the good of man as its goal ... was transformed by the efforts of adherents into its opposite.

    For this, there are corrupt and paid philosophers to convert any common thought into its opposite. However, not only philosophers.
    1. Villon
      Villon 27 January 2016 18: 45 New
      +3
      Yes, philosophers play their sinister role in this matter. Once philosophers were famous for their ability to separate good from evil (Voltaire, Russo), modern philosophers are increasingly famous for their ability to mix good and evil.
      1. venaya
        venaya 27 January 2016 19: 08 New
        +2
        Quote: Villon
        Once philosophers were famous for their ability to separate good from evil (Voltaire, Russo), modern philosophers are increasingly famous for their ability to mix good and evil.

        Yes, the Great, and after the activities of these great philosophers, the Great French Revolution arose with the subsequent Napoleonic Wars, the very ones that resulted in France losing a third of its population. What can we say about modern philosophy, go to the Filosovo website (it’s better foreign) and the secret will be revealed to you - modern philosophical teachings are only busy with all their efforts to engage in a trivial substitution of concepts, this is especially evident when comparing their activities with the activities of recognized great philosophers of the past , classics.
        1. varov14
          varov14 27 January 2016 20: 26 New
          0
          They must impress upon the masses that the future life of the biorobot is much better than the life of a rational person.
  4. Sasha75
    Sasha75 27 January 2016 17: 36 New
    16
    That also happens.
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 27 January 2016 18: 51 New
      -3
      That also happens
      minus mine, and the pros must be thought of from alcoholics. In the same way, the USSR was destroyed with jokes and jokes. Now they live according to the principle, "what's wrong", "it's cool."
    2. varov14
      varov14 27 January 2016 20: 32 New
      -1
      Yes, Sasha, your descendants will not drink neither beer nor alcohol, they will have an electric stimulator in their pumpkin and even not Chinese.
  5. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 27 January 2016 17: 38 New
    22
    Caution: humanism
  6. Altona
    Altona 27 January 2016 17: 39 New
    +3
    Experiments on changing a person and his organs, using a person as an organ donor, managing a person and his behavior through technical means already have ethical sides. That is, one organism is donated to another, although initially they should be recognized as equal. The imposition of their ideology and way of life on the allegedly "backward", the imposition of force by force of arms and economic strangulation. Such is "humanism".
  7. red_october
    red_october 27 January 2016 17: 40 New
    11
    Guided by these postulates, the United States and NATO have repeatedly "cared" for people outside their borders, supporting the "democratic forces" in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria.

    And then kind Europe decided to shelter these "people outside their borders", not figuring out who they are and where to settle them ...
    1. SklochPensioner
      SklochPensioner 27 January 2016 18: 24 New
      +5
      Funny picture smile
      But instead of asking "... am I trembling or have the right?" will be: "Alla, I'm in the bar!" and the whole manifesto!

      At first I didn’t understand where the word from Dostoevsky’s quote went ... censorship, however! Replaced by an ellipsis lol
      1. varov14
        varov14 27 January 2016 20: 46 New
        +1
        Our censorship is also implicated in humanism, and the quote from Dostoevsky is not a state secret on the technical characteristics of weapons, for example, she sleeps there. And here is just something, let's say the letter x, but !!!, suddenly the western man in the street will not correctly interpret and take it for a secret Russian symbol, calling for a split in Europe.
      2. DPG
        DPG 27 January 2016 23: 40 New
        0
        The picture is more likely about how you would not hide, and under what guise you would not hide, if you are a thief and a destroyer, then Alla will send her appraiser from the bar to the correct address.
  8. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 27 January 2016 17: 41 New
    +6
    Any idea brought to radicalism is bad.
  9. poquello
    poquello 27 January 2016 17: 43 New
    0
    With the colors of such humanists it is quite humane to crush.
  10. Vasya_Piterskiy
    Vasya_Piterskiy 27 January 2016 17: 43 New
    +3
    World rule ... Sweet dream of the Anglo-Saxons ... But to hell with you with butter. As long as Russia lives this will not happen.
  11. tol100v
    tol100v 27 January 2016 17: 49 New
    +2
    Europe with its tolerance, humanity and terry liberalism has already jumped to the "zugunder", and the inspirers of the "Humanitarian missions to spread crap around the world", it all itching to do!
    1. varov14
      varov14 27 January 2016 20: 52 New
      0
      Yes, the main ideologists of humanism, something in Europe, began to pack their bags together.
  12. Monos
    Monos 27 January 2016 17: 53 New
    +8
    About humanism - I agree. Not the first case of substitution of concepts. The connection between "humanists" and "liberals" is very well noted, and this connection rests on one thesis: the demand for absolute rights for selected individuals and the denial of any obligations to society. Like this:
  13. Vladislav 73
    Vladislav 73 27 January 2016 17: 55 New
    +2
    The criterion for evaluating any theory is practice. What everyone knows about the theoretical delights of liberals is clear to everyone, except for themselves. I think it's time for psychiatry to introduce new types of diseases - liberalism, multiculturalism ... and so on. A man living in his a delusional world divorced from reality is unhealthy in any way.
    1. varov14
      varov14 27 January 2016 20: 57 New
      0
      Glory to God, humanism is still small-town, European humanists pack their bags, apparently there is still room to run, and imagine global - tryndets.
    2. Villon
      Villon 27 January 2016 21: 52 New
      +1
      You know, when a person comes to me and dictates to me his program of my destruction, I want to call him not mentally ill, divorced from reality, but somehow differently.
  14. Humpty
    Humpty 27 January 2016 18: 03 New
    0
    That's what I thought about, the ideas of humanism. The Inquisition, which sometimes burned heretics in some places. Protestants who burned women and cats for hundreds of years. Monks hanged by a rib and burned simple believers in connection with the Nikon reform. Peasants eaten after execution during the cultural revolution.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 27 January 2016 19: 08 New
      +2
      Very nice post. You gave vivid examples
      anti-humanism in history. Examples where human life
      was rated at zero.
    2. varov14
      varov14 27 January 2016 21: 05 New
      +2
      You are hinting at a spiral, the way it is, now the dictatorship is already perceived as the possibility of at least some kind of order, understandable and protecting society. The only thing to introduce is the dictatorship of the majority.
  15. Villon
    Villon 27 January 2016 18: 07 New
    +7
    And what does this modern humanism have in common with the humanism of the 16th century? No need to be fooled by names. Politicians can call everything to everyone, and at the same time prove that they themselves believe in this name. Hitler also considered himself a humanist. After all, he fought with the church - which means a humanist. He was also for the full disclosure of human abilities - which means, again, a humanist. Have you ever seen anyone who calls himself an anti-humanist? But when it comes to ways of implementing humanism, to particulars, the more genuine nature of man or movement is revealed.
    1. Beaver
      Beaver 27 January 2016 18: 41 New
      +2
      Quote: Villon
      And what does this modern humanism have in common with the humanism of the 16th century?

      But this is the most.
      The basic position of the humanistic worldview is the recognition of man as the highest value in relation to all others: material, spiritual, natural or social.

      In the sixteenth century, the ideas of humanism were only gaining strength, they had difficulty struggling their way to people's minds. Today they possess mass consciousness, are absolutized and brought to the point of absurdity.
      I am a person - everything for me, that I want, I do, I do not reckon with anything and with anyone. What distinguishes "this modern humanism" from egoism? Is that the need to distinguish between "humans" and "subhumans."
      1. varov14
        varov14 27 January 2016 21: 22 New
        0
        "Man" and "subhuman" is already easy and understandable. At the modern level of consciousness, it is already being introduced, if you “earn”, then a person, if only “you receive,” is already subhuman, and this no longer depends on your creative potential. Over time, it will simply get worse, as it is now with humanism and liberalism. There are many of us and we are superfluous, they are brought to us, but we do not understand.
  16. BNVSurgut
    BNVSurgut 27 January 2016 18: 18 New
    +2
    The question arises: is it possible to build a stable society, where there are different ideas about good and evil?
    I wonder how Western politicians respond to it, and why people are being led to these answers.
    1. varov14
      varov14 27 January 2016 21: 41 New
      0
      They live relatively well, but they already reproduce poorly. I wonder how the ideas of humanism will be driven into the "African" heads. On an empty stomach, humanism will not crawl into the head, and for free, the idea of ​​taking away arises, if they give and allow. But do not think that only the beggars are taken away by the fords, the rich freeloaders are taking away with even greater zeal, you just have to give and allow, human psychology is one, the creator has molded from one clay. Give - take it.
  17. _my opinion
    _my opinion 27 January 2016 18: 23 New
    +3
    The manifesto argues that "it is time to introduce a new way to identify a person - membership in the world community." In fact, the authors of the document stand on the position of denying the state as a relic of the past.

    Is the state a relic of the past? I agree with this when the United States and England apply this to their states ...
  18. Dezinto
    Dezinto 27 January 2016 18: 38 New
    +7
    And there is also an interesting theory that is also actively used - "Overton window" - read, - the same topic, - one of the management tools ...



    Overton described the TECHNOLOGY, which allows you to legalize absolutely any idea.

    1st step. From the unthinkable to the radical.

    2nd step. From radical to acceptable.

    3rd step. From acceptable to reasonable.

    4th step. From reasonable to popular.

    5th step. From popular to politics / norms.

    And ffso - peasants can and should even if he wants to break into parliament to wear skirts. Marriage with animals. And other mischievous other nonsense ..... that went through Overton's window.
  19. andrew42
    andrew42 27 January 2016 18: 46 New
    +4
    In general, why did you decide that "humanism" is honesty, justice, respect and love for a person? Human is a person, and the semantics does not specify what kind of person he is. You can also interpret "humanism" as "human nutrition". Like I love "Humans", but with a strange love ... - the Polynesian cannibal is quite entitled to such an interpretation. However, modern liberals and "humanists" echo him with the fruits of their deeds.
    1. Beaver
      Beaver 27 January 2016 19: 20 New
      +3
      You want to say, the cannibal, unlike the humanist, really loves people? wassat
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 27 January 2016 20: 20 New
        +1
        He is a humanist. This is black humor ---. Why does a person suffer from the vicissitudes of life? It is better to lie in the stomach of a "humanist" Something like this is said about the right to efthanasia.
      2. varov14
        varov14 27 January 2016 21: 53 New
        +1
        He was just a pure humanist. He did not furnish everything with moral categories in relation to the devoured, as the United States is doing now, and in this sense was more moral.
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 27 January 2016 22: 27 New
          0
          In this connection, I also thought about Iraq, Libya, etc. Such cannibalism on a larger scale. You can find fault with anyone with humanistic motivation.
  20. GAF
    GAF 27 January 2016 18: 49 New
    +2
    Classic. The broom cannot be broken. Individual twigs are easy. After that, the finish based on the Strugatskys' novel "Predatory Things of the Century".
  21. Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam 27 January 2016 19: 14 New
    +4
    It must be remembered and clarified that as soon as “An important factor in the success of an ideological system is its conformity to the economic model that determines the social structure that dominates in society,” this ideological system simply turns into a servant of the economic model. Let’s say frankly that there is no so-called humanism, like liberalism, but there is a fairy tale aimed at turning Man into an element of consumer conglomerate. At the same time, the less a person will have differences from a freely consuming brainless cadavre, the better, the better for an economic model that has got a single goal nailed. All the so-called Western and European values ​​are aimed precisely at such a transformation of Man - freely consuming the likeness of Man.
  22. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 27 January 2016 20: 13 New
    0
    "... the division of peoples along ethnic lines is outdated and it is time to abolish it ....." so in the article. It is already outdated to divide by gender, examples of complete gender reassignment or weekly experiments. Same-sex marriages, marriages with animals, animals- heirs, etc. Thus, a complete lack of identification. Equation with animals. Transformation into faceless biomass. And speechless, because as a result of the mixing of nations, languages ​​will become impoverished, primitivized or completely disappear ... Homosexuality is not an example of freedom, but a breakdown of all concepts in the public religious level. As a result, degradation. This is such a new meaning of freedom.
  23. fsps
    fsps 27 January 2016 20: 32 New
    0
    Freedom is what? Permissiveness? Impunity? Complete disregard for your neighbor? Let them explain, otherwise it looks like religious dogmas without the right to analyze and doubt. There are instructions from "competent authorities" such as the State Department and other special services, so march, otherwise there will be "democratizing bombers" and "humanizing warheads."
  24. akula
    akula 27 January 2016 22: 11 New
    0
    Humanity is ruined elementarily right in front of our eyes, two things, the elementary greed of some and the cowardice of others. I think that the majority of the world's population does not agree with the new world order. A constructive proposal, let's fight, and not stupidly wait until we are chipizated.
    1. aleksey980
      aleksey980 28 January 2016 01: 04 New
      0
      Quote: akula
      Humanity is ruined elementarily right in front of our eyes, two things, the elementary greed of some and the cowardice of others. I think that the majority of the world's population does not agree with the new world order. A constructive proposal, let's fight, and not stupidly wait until we are chipizated.

      Alas and ah, but it is so. But rather not cowardice, but inertia and lack of talent and ability to work with the masses. "In the kitchen" everyone will agree - "let's do something" and ... will continue to sit. As well as, alas, you and I and 99,9% of those present here (0,1% - for hope, or maybe someone is still ...). Because in the first place we have - to feed the family and, therefore, there is no time to try to disturb the water. But those who have plenty of free time and the problems of providing for the family are solved quite simply (they stole several dozen lyamas with scams and live peacefully until the next prey), they, yes, they try to trouble the water, but among them most often, in fact, there are those who who messes up the water in order to swim to the feeder himself.
      In order to act, we need a well-developed program of these actions. Can you make it up? The program is not only a model of the state’s structure, but also a plan for the establishment and development of this system. Collectively, this can be done (at least a model with the beginnings of a plan can be developed based on current realities), even within the framework of local and one or two similar communities, the benefit of educated and competent people is enough. But it’s not at all something to read the article, to run diagonally through the comments and get something done. This is a serious and long work, taking a large piece of time and effort. Who can afford it?
      In addition, the rule has always worked and, for sure, will continue to operate, the rule: "The revolution is conceived by romantics, performed by fanatics, scoundrels use the fruits" (c) / I don't remember who /. On a smaller scale, this also works.

      P.S. (added) As a rule, action without planning leads to "senseless and merciless" (according to Pushkin).
  25. varov14
    varov14 27 January 2016 22: 14 New
    0
    "Humanism - 1. A historically changing system of views that recognizes the value of a person as a person, his right to freedom, happiness, development and manifestation of his abilities, considering the good of a person as a criterion for assessing social relations" ---- at first it was something like this, but without "the good of man", which is considered a criterion for assessing social relations, humanism, as it were, does not exist.
  26. red_october
    red_october 27 January 2016 22: 35 New
    0
    Humanism is a great thing!
  27. Villon
    Villon 27 January 2016 22: 45 New
    0
    Quote: poquello
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    the close connection of humanism and liberalism, proclaiming freedom the highest value of life

    Indeed, I noticed that when you discuss with liberal-oriented citizens, they put in the first place in the priority of values ​​some kind of abstract "freedom", which we, in Russia, allegedly badly lack. At the same time, they cannot give a clear definition of this term. Even our liberal prime minister and leader of the ruling party doesn't really understand what it is. smile

    Elementary - I smoke, leave me this freedom if I do not interfere with others. By the way, the “freedom fighters” could not explain specifically what freedoms in Russia are lacking.

    The freedom of Pussy Riot in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior to celebrate Black Mass.
  28. red_october
    red_october 27 January 2016 23: 13 New
    +1
    Quote: Villon
    Quote: poquello
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    the close connection of humanism and liberalism, proclaiming freedom the highest value of life

    Indeed, I noticed that when you discuss with liberal-oriented citizens, they put in the first place in the priority of values ​​some kind of abstract "freedom", which we, in Russia, allegedly badly lack. At the same time, they cannot give a clear definition of this term. Even our liberal prime minister and leader of the ruling party doesn't really understand what it is. smile

    Elementary - I smoke, leave me this freedom if I do not interfere with others. By the way, the “freedom fighters” could not explain specifically what freedoms in Russia are lacking.

    The freedom of Pussy Riot in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior to celebrate Black Mass.


    The problem is that the West instantly turned "freedom" as the highest value into an uncontrollable satisfaction of any desire of this newly-made "free personality" - but what can you do, humanism, the Renaissance, you have to correspond to the times. Putting a person and only him in the center of the universe and looking at himself, he slowly began to pass the institution of the family. The personality is more important, but the family ... This was especially progressing in the mid-20th century. It became easy to get divorced, without fear of public condemnation, it became easy to start new relationships, it became the norm, flirting, open clothes, casual with *** ks-the norm, it turned out, moreover, that the rights of feminists, gay men, were oppressed for a long time. They adjusted the legislation and the social order to this case - bam! Pedophiles are oppressed. Here's a party for you, gentlemen, pedophiles, here's the laws, citizens of the democratic Netherlands and Norway. From the age of 12 it is now possible, yes. And with your children, you even need to teach it. Do not agree? We will select the children and still teach and educate. Your rights are our main value! To make all categories of minorities happy. And the majority will object - we will sue him. Here's juvenile justice for you, here's sex education lessons and he *** zma, here's Conchita Wurst, and she's got the 1st place at Eurovision. Yes. And such an educated, sensual and free European goes straight to hell, having previously arranged it for descendants on earth ...
  29. Orionvit
    Orionvit 27 January 2016 23: 24 New
    +1
    Quote: varov14
    They couldn’t explain this one thing, but what they don’t understand is your omission, you had to put your fist in your face and here it is the clear clarity of freedom in terms of humanism and moral permissiveness.

    Right. When you hear words like: "all progressive humanity, the entire world community, all democratic forces, humanism, freedom, democracy, tolerance, tolerance, universal human values," and so on, you need to hit the ground with your fist. Yes, so that it would be imprinted on the forehead.
  30. voliador
    voliador 27 January 2016 23: 44 New
    +2
    To each gumnonist and liberalist - on a separate birch, with a free rope as a gift!
  31. KOH
    KOH 28 January 2016 06: 13 New
    0
    We have this freedom in my opinion so ate that the people dream of Tatalitarianism, and abundant salivation from this freedom, even old women spit ...)))))
  32. Villon
    Villon 28 January 2016 11: 50 New
    0
    Quote: red_october
    Your rights are our main value!

    And since my rights are the main value, it means that they are more valuable than "I".