Military Review

Nikolai Patrushev in an interview with MK spoke out in favor of “thanking the USA for Crimea”

165
In an interview with Moskovsky Komsomolets, Secretary of the Security Council of Russia Nikolai Patrushev answered a journalist’s question, “Is modern Russia trying, having only a part of the resources of the former Soviet Union, to pursue a foreign policy that was only a superpower of the USSR level?” Nikolai Patrushev replied that Russia does not seek to prove to someone that it is a superpower, and does not seek to dominate the world, as the United States does. According to the Secretary of the Security Council, Russia has its own national interests, and the primary task is to protect these interests.


Nikolai Patrushev in an interview with MK spoke out in favor of “thanking the USA for Crimea”


After that, Patrushev was asked about when the confrontation between Russia and the West would end? And when the secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation answered that it was not Russia that started the confrontation, the journalist "MK" he immediately declared the following:
I suspect that any Westerner will object to this: didn’t you take the Crimea from Ukraine and include it in Russia? You really could not do this!


Nikolai Patrushev gave a very elegant answer to this frankly provocative question, stating that Crimea is not a Russian initiative either, and he offered to thank the United States for the reunification of Crimea and Sevastopol with Russia, which started the anti-constitutional coup in Ukraine.

From an interview with Nikolai Patrushev:
Crimea joined the Russian Federation not because Russia wanted it, but because the population of the peninsula held a referendum and decided by absolute majority: we want to live as part of Russia, and not as part of Ukraine.


The Russian Security Council secretary also answered the question about the “appropriateness” of Russia's participation in the counter-terrorist operation in Syria. According to Patrushev, terrorist groups operating in Syria threaten many countries of the world, including Russia, and therefore the participation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in this operation is the defense of Russian security interests.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
165 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. bort4145
    bort4145 26 January 2016 16: 17
    57
    A long time ago, a song was written: "Yes, we know how to fight, but we don't want to again ..."
    But if forced, we will!
    1. alex-s
      alex-s 26 January 2016 16: 23
      23
      We are peaceful people, but .....
      1. jjj
        jjj 26 January 2016 17: 24
        20
        It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship
        1. Foresterer
          Foresterer 26 January 2016 17: 27
          +9
          Obama urgently to the table in the correct and elegant translation. Let his turnip or what is it, coconut? scratch.
        2. Scoun
          Scoun 26 January 2016 18: 00
          23
          Quote: jjj
          It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship

          everything is clear with Obama, but what about such personnel as the journalist MK?

          Maybe he's just a good journalist trying to ask "sharp" questions .. but taking into account the fact that before that Patrushev answered quite enough
          Russia has its own national interests, and the primary task is to protect these interests.
          After this, Patrushev was asked the question of when will the confrontation between Russia and the West end? And when the Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation replied, that Russia didn’t start this confrontation,

          and here is a clear provocation
          MK journalist immediately stated the following:
          I suspect that any Westerner will object to this: Didn’t You Take Crimea Ukraine and included it in Russia? You could well not have done this!

          I wonder if it was WE who took / returned Crimea, then who is this journalist? whose will not be identified with the Russian Federation? Another could say that WE took it away, but he emphasized that "YOU".
          1. V.ic
            V.ic 26 January 2016 18: 49
            12
            Quote: Scoun
            Who is this journalist? Whose will not be identifying with the Russian Federation?

            The representative of the "second oldest" profession, by nature, most likely related to the "first oldest" in terms of the use of his intellect.
          2. mahor
            mahor 28 January 2016 18: 29
            0
            MK is an American newspaper. drinks The same as the Echo of Moscow. And the questions are asked by their owner ....
        3. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 26 January 2016 18: 37
          13
          Quote: jjj
          It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship

          Nikolai Patrushev gave a very elegant answer, saying that Crimea is also not a Russian initiative, while offering to thank the United States for the reunification of Crimea and Sevastopol with Russia, which started an anti-constitutional coup in Ukraine.
          I already read it as a joke, as
          Obama was informed that they invested 5 lard dollars in Maidan, and he scratched his turnip and thoughtfully said: "Is it that we bought the Crimea from Ukraine for 5 lard from Russia?"
        4. dmi.pris
          dmi.pris 26 January 2016 19: 03
          +1
          With a spin on the back ....
          Quote: jjj
          It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship
        5. ssergn
          ssergn 26 January 2016 19: 48
          +5
          Better "For Services to the Fatherland". In some places they will go crazy completely.
          1. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 26 January 2016 22: 07
            +2
            Quote: ssergn
            Better "For Services to the Fatherland". In some places they will go crazy completely.

            They have McCain twice Hero of the Soviet Union. There are just enough destroyed American planes. Plus the personnel, plus the damage to "Forrestal" ... Dad, of course, covered up - they say that NURS got off his plane, then they hit him, or else he was not there at all ... You can't fool the KGB !! ! laughing Secret Agent McCain - secretly and was awarded. Yes, and dad, McCain Sr., there was a reason behind our agent's cover ... So the New York Times may write - the KGB has long arms! laughing
          2. Alexey-74
            Alexey-74 27 January 2016 09: 14
            0
            Preferably from the hands of Patrushev ..... laughing
        6. Alex77
          Alex77 26 January 2016 21: 45
          +1
          He was already offered to be made a holder of the medal “For the liberation of Sevastopol.” In my opinion, he deserved it.
        7. Ebundey Mukhryuev
          Ebundey Mukhryuev 26 January 2016 22: 45
          +1
          Medal for the reunification of Crimea with Russia!
        8. Michael67
          Michael67 27 January 2016 03: 40
          +2
          It is necessary to reward Obama with all the viruses that they spray in Russia.
        9. ZIS
          ZIS 28 January 2016 20: 57
          0
          In general, he will litter the peoples, but he is worthy of the Crimean medal.
    2. cniza
      cniza 26 January 2016 16: 26
      +9
      Let now they are tormented and trying to solve these mysterious Russians, only how many centuries can not do this ... we are different.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 26 January 2016 16: 36
        16
        Historical note: Russia never started wars, our historical mission of the war is to end.
        Incidentally,news:
        "" Putin proposed to introduce confiscation of the property of corrupt officials. "
        1. atalef
          atalef 26 January 2016 16: 43
          -41 qualifying.
          Quote: subbtin.725
          Historical note: Russia never started wars

          Background
          The Northern War: 1700-1721
          Prussian campaign: 1711
          Sending troops to Khiva: 1717
          Expedition to the Lower reaches: 1722-1724
          War with Persia: 1725-1733
          War with the Commonwealth: 1733-1734
          Hike to the Rhine: 1735
          War with Turkey: 1735-1739
          Military campaign against Sweden: 1741-1748
          Sending Prince Repnin to the Rhine: 1748
          War with Prussia: 1756-1762
          War with the Commonwealth: 1769-1772
          War with Turkey: 1769-1774
          War with Turkey: 1787-1791
          War with Sweden: 1788-1790
          War with the Commonwealth: 1794
          War with Persia: 1796
          War with France: 1798-1799
          Suppression of the uprising of Tadeusz Kostyushki: 1794
          The Russo-Austro-French War, where the Russian army is fighting in Italy: 1798-1802
          The occupation of Kartli, Kakheti, Georgia: 1801
          The Occupation of Megrelia, Georgia: 1803
          The Russian-Iranian war, which entailed the occupation of Azerbaijan, part of Dagestan, and the capture of the Ganja Khanate: 1804-1813.
          Russian-Austro-French War: 1805
          Russian-Prussian-French war: 1806-1807
          The Russian-Swedish war, which led to the occupation of Finland: 1807-1809
          Punitive expedition against the Circassians, which ended practically with their actual extermination: 1822-1826.
          Capture of the Erivan and Nakhichevan Khanates: 1826-1828
          The Russian-Turkish war, which led to the occupation of the Caucasian coast of the Black Sea to Batumi: 1828-1829.
          The creation of the Lezghin line of fortresses in the Caucasus, the suppression of the rebellion of the Murids, the suppression of uprisings in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus: 1830-1831.
          Military expedition to the Trans-Kuban and Accident: 1834
          The war against Shamil in the Caucasus: 1837-1840.
          Breakthrough of the rebelled Highlanders in Kabarda and Kakheti: 1846
          Russian military intervention in Hungary, capture of Shamil Kazikuhum: 1848-1849
          Creation of the Rupa line of fortresses, suppression of the Circassian uprising: 1850-1851
          Crimean War: 1853-1856
          Russian invasion of Central Asia: 1860
          Capture of the fortresses of Pishek and Suzak in Uzbekistan: 1862-1863
          the final conquest of Abkhazia, the capture of the cities of Aliye-Ata, Chimkent in Central Asia: 1863-1864.
          Shturm Russian troops of Tashkent, the invasion of the Bukhara Khanate, the capture of Samarkand and other large settlements: 1865-1868.
          The conquest of the Khivan Khanate: 1868-1872
          The landing of Russian troops on the shore of the Caspian Sea, the beginning of the invasion of Turkmenistan: 1869
          The capture of the Ili region from China, the foundation of Vladivostok as the base of the Far Eastern flotilla: 1871. Suppression of the uprisings of Uzbeks and Kyrgyz, occupation of Sakhalin: 1873-1876.
          The Russian-Turkish war, the suppression of uprisings in Chechnya and Dagestan: 1877-1878.
          Capture of the fortresses of Geok Tepe and Ashgabat: 1881
          The final conquest of Turkmenistan: 1883-1885
          Russian-Afghan military incident due to Kushka: 1885
          Russian occupation of the Pamirs and Primorsky Territory: 1885-1895
          The expansion of Russia in Northeast China, the suppression of the uprising in Uzbekistan: 1896-1898
          Suppression of Ihethuan Rebellion: 1899
          Russian-Anglo-German-American intervention in China, Russian occupation of Manchuria: 1900-1901

          this is so, if in fact.
          1. str73
            str73 26 January 2016 16: 52
            16
            What about the Americans? ... "Even if my country is wrong, but this is my country!" - it seems so?
            1. Mahmut
              Mahmut 26 January 2016 18: 00
              +7
              Punitive expedition against the Circassians, which ended practically with their actual extermination: 1822-1826.
              Creation of the Rupa line of fortresses, suppression of the Circassian uprising: 1850-1851
              shoal
            2. stas-xnumx
              stas-xnumx 29 January 2016 16: 08
              +1
              Whether it is right or not, but this is my Fatherland, I really like this phrase ...
            3. stas-xnumx
              stas-xnumx 29 January 2016 16: 08
              0
              Whether it is right or not, but this is my Fatherland, I really like this phrase ...
          2. Приговор
            Приговор 26 January 2016 16: 57
            35
            I convinced you. We are scary people. We have not come to Israel yet? ..;))))
            1. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 17: 10
              -35 qualifying.
              Quote: Sentence
              I convinced you. We are scary people. We have not come to Israel yet? ..;))))

              why should I convince or not 7
              this is a story, where do you get from it?
              It seems that I invented it myself and there was nothing of this.
              Russia, like any state, waged wars. including predatory. many of which started first.
              and enough slogans already.
              otherwise it’s possible in the second part, to give a historical reference
              Quote: subbtin.725
              our historic mission of war is to end.
              1. Asadullah
                Asadullah 26 January 2016 17: 35
                -7
                and enough slogans already


                laughing Dear, you, like Don Quixote, break spears in the fight against slogans! Watercolor: "The cruel Alexander takes away the last toys from the children.")))
                1. atalef
                  atalef 26 January 2016 17: 39
                  -13 qualifying.
                  Quote: Asadullah
                  and enough slogans already


                  laughing Dear, you, like Don Quixote, break spears in the fight against slogans! Watercolor: "The cruel Alexander takes away the last toys from the children.")))

                  Hey . asadullah
                  Well, no matter what the child was amusing, if only not with his hands. laughing hi
                  1. Asadullah
                    Asadullah 26 January 2016 19: 39
                    +1
                    Hey . asadullah


                    Hello, Alexander! Do you continue to annoy society?) That's what I like about the Jews, they do not leave anyone indifferent!
                    1. atalef
                      atalef 26 January 2016 20: 06
                      -9
                      Quote: Asadullah
                      Hey . asadullah


                      Hello, Alexander! Do you continue to annoy society?) That's what I like about the Jews, they do not leave anyone indifferent!

                      For all the Jews there is a judge.
                      For liveliness. For the mind. For stoop.
                      For the fact that the Jew shot at the leader.
                      For the fact that she missed.

                      hi
                      1. andj61
                        andj61 26 January 2016 21: 39
                        14
                        Quote: atalef
                        For all the Jews there is a judge.
                        For liveliness. For the mind. For stoop.
                        For the fact that the Jew shot at the leader.
                        For the fact that she missed.

                        drinks
                        Having been mistaken in a blissful common paradise,
                        but loving old dreams,
                        Jews emigrate to Israel
                        to feel Russian.

                        Forever and not getting old
                        everywhere and any time of the year
                        lasts where two Jews converge,
                        dispute about the fate of the Russian people.
              2. kartalovkolya
                kartalovkolya 28 January 2016 10: 31
                0
                In vain, gentlemen, you pay attention to this small Jewish card sharper, the ability to distort not only cards but also historical facts in their blood! After all, even the Lord God did not convince them (the Jews), punishing them for meanness and betrayal, scattering them all over the world and Of the Second Coming to be reunited, because even now they (who betrayed the son of God and crucified him) are screaming about their "God's chosenness"!
              3. andrewkor
                andrewkor 28 January 2016 19: 17
                0
                rescript of Alexander III at the beginning of expansion into Central Asia: "In order to expand the boundaries of the Empire ...."
            2. Executer
              Executer 26 January 2016 17: 24
              +1
              Ha! Yes, we have been there for a long time ... Have you noticed? Starting, like, with Golda Meir.
            3. Kite
              Kite 26 January 2016 18: 47
              +6
              Quote: Sentence
              I convinced you. We are scary people. We have not come to Israel yet?

              - how didn’t they come? There, one third of those who have grown up with us have become people.
              1. ssergn
                ssergn 26 January 2016 19: 55
                +1
                And yet, yes, atalef then where?
                Alexander hi
          3. Polite Moose
            Polite Moose 26 January 2016 17: 01
            20
            Quote: atalef
            Background

            Quote: atalef
            this is so, if in fact.


            Given the facts that atalef cited, in my opinion, it is high time for Russia to abandon the image of the non-initiator of the war first. A kind of big, strong, but kind bear. And then it seems that it is precisely in the expectation that Russia will not start first, they are barking at us from all sides.
            1. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 17: 03
              -25 qualifying.
              Quote: Polite Elk
              In my opinion, it is high time for Russia to abandon the image of the non-initiator of war first.

              And why did you decide. that Russia has such an image in the world?
              1. Polite Moose
                Polite Moose 26 January 2016 18: 26
                +6
                Quote: atalef
                And why did you decide. that Russia has such an image in the world?


                Yes, once a school history textbook was read (still Soviet).
          4. Dazdranagon
            Dazdranagon 26 January 2016 17: 05
            34
            Quote: atalef
            Background

            War with Sweden: 1788-1790
            - here's a clean decision to check one thing and hit - "Russian-Swedish war (1788-1790) - the war started by Sweden ..." laughing
            1. jjj
              jjj 26 January 2016 17: 14
              27
              Quote: Dazdranagon
              Russian-Swedish War (1788-1790) - the war started by Sweden ... "

              That's it ... And in the West it is customary to study another story. Yes, and we treacherously incited Hitler. Soon we will be accused of the Holocaust. Here are still living Jewish witnesses, and we will be guilty
            2. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 17: 20
              -19 qualifying.
              Quote: Dazdranagon
              "Russian-Swedish war (1788-1790)

              Quote: Dazdranagon
              Here I decided to check one thing and got it - "Russian-Swedish war (1788-1790) - the war started by Sweden ..."

              Russian-Swedish War (1788-1790) - the war launched by Sweden and supported by Great Britain, Holland and Prussia with the aim of returning the territories lost during the previous wars with Russia.

              The cause of the war was Russia's participation in the internal affairs of Sweden. In particular, Russia's active positioning as a guarantor of the future constitution of Sweden, which was canceled by King Gustav III in 1772 and subsequently served as an occasion for bilateral tension. Another important factor was the armament of the Russian squadron designated for operations in the Mediterranean Sea.

              This is a continuation of the Northern War.
              1. Aleksandr1981
                Aleksandr1981 26 January 2016 17: 58
                24
                [quote = atalef] This is a continuation of the Northern War. [/ quo
                Using your logic, I can say that all wars with Europe are the return of the lands of the ancient Russian state. And we did not start this war.
              2. hrych
                hrych 26 January 2016 18: 02
                10
                Did it all start with the Exodus? No, my friend, Sweden began, then Sweden. Miguel figs start again? wassat And then the continuation of the pier, then call one North ...
              3. Dazdranagon
                Dazdranagon 26 January 2016 21: 51
                +5
                Quote: atalef
                This is a continuation of the Northern War.
                - OK! But would such a reason for the Northern War suit? -
                The Russian Tsar Peter I was the last to join the Northern Union after negotiations with Augustus, which was formalized by the Preobrazhensky Treaty. Russia's territorial claims against Sweden included primarily Ingria and Karelia, which were torn away by Sweden in Time of Troubles under the Stolbovsky Treaty of 1617
              4. Ivan Burygin
                Ivan Burygin 28 January 2016 03: 41
                +1
                Quote: atalef
                The cause of the war was Russia's participation in the internal affairs of Sweden. In particular, Russia's active positioning as a guarantor of the future constitution of Sweden, which was canceled by King Gustav III in 1772 and subsequently served as an occasion for bilateral tension. Another important factor was the armament of the Russian squadron designated for operations in the Mediterranean Sea.

                You show it to amers. And at the same time France, Germany and Poland - also guarantors in 2014 were ...
          5. Sober
            Sober 26 January 2016 17: 06
            18
            Quote: atalef
            this is so, if in fact.

            the author did a great job. And yet he’s not right.
            1. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 17: 21
              -19 qualifying.
              Quote: Sober
              Quote: atalef
              this is so, if in fact.

              the author did a great job. And yet he’s not right.

              Well, disprove it.
              So . that would be consistent
              Quote: subbtin.725
              Russia never started wars
              1. hrych
                hrych 26 January 2016 18: 15
                +6
                Quote: atalef
                This is a continuation of the Northern War.

                Quote: Aleksandr1981
                Using your logic, I can say that all wars with Europe are the return of the lands of the ancient Russian state. And we did not start this war.

                --------------------------------------------------
              2. a housewife
                a housewife 28 January 2016 16: 33
                0
                Started, started. When especially get it! Do not get it !!!
          6. Humpty
            Humpty 26 January 2016 17: 08
            22
            atalef, they checked the authenticity, or did they randomly copy someone’s lies? They forgot to include the Kuchum village, the aspen stake in the Khazaria’s coffin and the ruin of German soap factories.
            1. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 18: 23
              -14 qualifying.
              Quote: Humpty
              atalef, they checked the authenticity, or did they randomly copy someone’s lies? They forgot to include the Kuchum village, the aspen stake in the Khazaria’s coffin and the ruin of German soap factories.

              Take away the wrong, leave it. what do you think is true.
              better read my posts carefully.
              1. Humpty
                Humpty 26 January 2016 18: 42
                +9
                We, like pigs, did not graze together to go to you. Collective farm named after S.M. The tsarist army was not able to take Budyonny, subsequently renamed, by storm. Budenny was not born then and there were no collective farms, although this is not known to the compiler.
                1. atalef
                  atalef 26 January 2016 18: 48
                  -13 qualifying.
                  Quote: Humpty
                  We, like pigs, did not graze together to go to you. Collective farm named after S.M. The tsarist army was not able to take Budyonny, subsequently renamed, by storm. Budenny was not born then and there were no collective farms, although this is not known to the compiler.

                  resembles a neighboring branch. about Rezun.
                  Everyone yells, but no one cites any facts.
                  So, as with list 7
                  Take away the excess. leave it - appropriate.
                  No problems . double check.
                  1. Humpty
                    Humpty 26 January 2016 19: 13
                    +8
                    Let each person insert his own penny. In 1860, and the kokandowns attacked Russia, they were beaten when approaching Verny, then they broke into their nearest fortresses. In Tokmak they broke the wall and let everyone go home with property. After a few days they did the same with Pishpek, although the fortress after the surrender they blew it up. In 1862, after a series of attacks, they returned and broke their fortresses to hell.
                    Suzak is not at all involved in affairs and far from there; he was created during the union, like a collective farm from the former Basmachi.
          7. kare
            kare 26 January 2016 17: 14
            29
            To begin with, we will consider the well-known official expulsions of the Jews and analyze them, then we will consider unofficial expulsions, and after that we will try to draw conclusions based on an analysis of all the facts.

            Official exiles (by order of the official authorities):

            ~ 1200 BC - Exodus from Egypt.

            474 BC - An unsuccessful attempt to expel Jews from the Achaemenid Empire by the court of Haman. Ended up with his execution and the coming to power of the Jews with the formal preservation of power at Artaxerxes I. Formally, the personal dislike of Aman was the reason.

            19 g. - the Roman emperor Tiberius, on the advice of the prefect of the Praetorians Sejanus, ordered to close the synagogue and send four thousand young Jews to military service on the island of Sardinia; in 30 or 31 after the execution of Sejan they were allowed to return, and the synagogues were reopened.

            50 g. - expulsion from Rome by Emperor Claudius.

            414 - under Patriarch Kirill, Jews were expelled from Alexandria

            VII century - from Arabia by Mohammed (Mohammed). Modern Islam is still outliving Jews wherever it has sufficient influence.

            613 AD - All Spanish Jews who refused to be baptized were forced to leave the country on the orders of King Sisebut. Returned to 620, expelled again to 638.

            1113 - from Russia by Vladimir Monomakh, who announced: "Now to expel the Jews from the Russian land with all their property and henceforth not to accept them, and if they secretly enter, then freely kill and rob them"; This happened after a major Jewish pogrom. the population revolted against Jewish oppression.

            1171 g. - the partial expulsion of Jews from Bologna and Rome, as evidenced by Christian and Jewish sources.

            1182 - King of France Philip II Augustus issued a decree expelling all Jews from France and confiscating their property. Most of the exiles took refuge in the neighboring counties of Champagne, the Kingdom of Provence, the county of Venesse and other places.

            1287 g. - pogrom in Bern (Switzerland), 1290 g. - exile.

            1290 from England by the English king Edward I. The official reason is usury, but such a reason cannot be the real reason for the expulsion of an entire nation, so there had to be something else. The complete exile was preceded by the compulsion of the Jews to wear a distinctive sign in the 1218 year. T.O. it can be said that the population of England began to feel discomfort from the Jews, while the Jews disguised themselves as the British and it was difficult to distinguish them. Only Jews were obliged to wear a distinctive sign, other foreigners should not have done this, i.e. Jews stood out among ordinary foreigners moving to England. Exile lasted 365 years and ceased with the destruction of royal power. The Jews were returned by Cromwell in the 1657 year. T.O. we see that the Jews benefited from the fall of the monarchical regime.

            1306 - King Philip IV the Beautiful issued a decree on the eviction of Jews from France and the confiscation of all their property. Jews were also expelled by Lorraine, Savoy, Dauphine, Franche-Comté. Most of the Jews moved to the southern provinces, not subject to the king. 28 July 1315 Louis X allowed Jews to return to France subject to a large ransom

            1320 g. - A decree was issued on the expulsion of all Jews from Rome. A delegation of Roman Jews led by a member of the well-known Roman-Jewish family Kalonimus managed to achieve the abolition of the decree, but while a new order was received, some Jews were already expelled.
            1. kare
              kare 26 January 2016 17: 17
              18
              1348 g. - Repeated expulsion from Switzerland. In 1397, Jews were prohibited from living in Basel, in 1427 in Bern, in 1428 in Friborg, in 1436 in Zurich, in 1475 in Schaffhausen, in 1490 in Geneva (where Jews lived from 1428 in a separate quarter, which was attacked in 1460), in Thurgau in 1494, at the end of 15. - in Lausanne (in some cases, an exception was made for doctors). In 1622, a meeting of representatives of 13 Swiss cantons (they controlled half of the territory of modern Switzerland) decided to “expel” the Jews forever. In the 16 – 18 centuries. Jewish communities existed only in three small towns of Baden County, which was not a full member of the Swiss Confederation - Argau, Klingnau and Oberendingen (now included in the canton of Argau).

              1349 - the first expulsion of Jews from Hungary. 1360 g. - the Jews were again expelled, but in 1364 g. They were allowed (although with some restrictions) to return.

              1394 - King Charles VI again forbade Jews to live in France. Jews again fled to the southern provinces. At the end of the 15th century, these lands entered the royal domain and the Jews were expelled from there too. After this, there were no Jews in France for three centuries.

              The end of the XIII-XIV centuries - numerous local expulsions of Jews from various principalities of Germany.

              1421 AD - By order of Albrecht V, all Jews of Austria were arrested. 270 people were burned at the stake on charges of desecrating a guest in Ens. All the others, with the exception of those who agreed to be baptized, were expelled from the country, their property was confiscated

              1477 - Duke of Lorraine Rene II expelled the Jews from the province.

              1487 g. - The municipal councils of Lisbon and several other cities adopted decrees on the expulsion of Jews. However, these orders were quashed by King Juan II.

              1492 from Spain by Isabella I and Ferdinand II ("Alhambra Decree").

              1492 from the island of Sicily by Ferdinand II.

              1495 from Florence.

              1495 g. - Prince Alexander announced the expulsion of Jews from Lithuania. The real estate of the exiles was declared the property of the prince and partially distributed to Christians. In 1501, Jews were allowed to return, and even property was returned

              December 1496 - King Manuel I issued a decree on the expulsion of Jews from Portugal and the mandatory baptism of all children. 20 000 Jews left the country. Those who remained were subjected to forced baptism according to a decree of March 19 1497 year. However, even the baptism and special “protective” decree of the king adopted in May 1497 did not save Jews from persecution and pogroms.

              1525 g. - the expulsion of Jews from Warsaw.

              1530 - 1584 g. - Under Ivan the Terrible, any stay of Jews in the country was prohibited. After him, the ban ceased to be strictly enforced. The entry of Jews into Muscovite Russia during the Time of Troubles took on a considerable scale, especially during the rule of False Dmitry I (1605 – 1606), which came to power with the help of the Polish army. Jews entered the retinue’s retinue and suffered during its deposition. According to some reports, False Dmitry II, who claimed the throne of Moscow, was a cross from the Jews and served in the retinue of False Dmitry I. Jews actively participated in the organization of the Time of Troubles and tried to come to power.
              1. kare
                kare 26 January 2016 17: 19
                17
                1549 g. - A decree was signed on the expulsion of Jews from Austria. But this decree was not fully implemented and part of the Jewish population remained. Under Maximilian II (1546 – 76), a decree was issued on the expulsion of the Jews of Lower Austria (1572), but it was also not executed despite requests from the estates. Jews forced to wear the distinctive sign introduced in Austria in 1550

                1555 - Pope Paul IV issued a bull about the eviction of Jews in a special quarter and the prohibition of Jews from owning land, selling grain, and Christians being treated by Jewish doctors.

                1569 - Bull Pius V was published on the expulsion of Jews from papal possessions in Italy (except Rome and Ancona) and France.

                1570 g. - the expulsion from Germany (Margrave of Brandenburg)

                23 April 1615 - Louis XIII issued a decree expelling Jews from France for a month under pain of death. Jews were forbidden to live not only in France, but also in its colonies

                1622 - from Switzerland.

                1647 g. - The English Revolution. 1657 - lifting the ban on the residence of Jews by Cromwell.

                1669 g. - An imperial decree was signed on the expulsion of Jews from Vienna, Lower and Upper Austria. In the fall of 1669, 1600 Jews were evicted. In 1670, the rest were expelled, including the richest Viennese Jews.

                1727 g. - from Russia by Empress Catherine I

                1742 g. - from Russia by Empress Elizabeth Petrovna

                1789 g. - The French Revolution. The coming of Jews to power in France, the prohibition of anti-Semitism.

                April 13, 1835 - a decree was published to the Senate, according to which Jews were allowed to settle freely in 6 western provinces and two regions, in 10 provinces with significant restrictions (for example, with a ban on living in provincial cities), in other places the settlement was prohibited - "Line settledness "
                In the 1870's, about 30 of thousands of Russian Jews fled to the United States, fleeing persecution. In the future, the pace of emigration grew rapidly: from 1881 to 1900, another 600 thousand Jews entered the United States. Jews who left Russia were forbidden to return. Relocation of Jews to Great Britain was suspended by the Law on Immigration of Aliens in 1905

                3 May 1882 g. - The so-called "May Laws" were introduced. They canceled some normative acts adopted earlier under Alexander II, which allowed certain categories of Jews to live outside the Pale of Settlement. After this, the next expulsion of Jews from large cities took place. In the very Pale of Settlement, Jews were forbidden to settle, rent or acquire real estate outside cities and towns

                1917 g. - The revolution in Russia. The complete seizure of power by the Jews, the prohibition of anti-Semitism.

                1930 years - from Germany by Adolf Hitler.

                1948 - 2000 - the expulsion of Jews from Muslim countries (Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen and Aden).

                The list above includes only official exiles conducted by official authorities. Ordinary pogroms, often informally supported by the authorities, are simply impossible to calculate.
                1. atalef
                  atalef 26 January 2016 17: 38
                  -21 qualifying.
                  Quote: kare
                  The list above includes only official exiles conducted by official authorities. Ordinary pogroms, often informally supported by the authorities, are simply impossible to calculate.

                  Ok the same was what?
                  Can facts be thrown out of history?
                  1. aleshka
                    aleshka 27 January 2016 17: 08
                    +5
                    No, from this we can conclude, what kind of Jews are good, smart and fair! The Russians are always aggressors, and the Jews are constantly offended! I want to note that of all the peoples of Europe, just the Russians treated the Jews most loyally!
                2. MIKHAN
                  MIKHAN 26 January 2016 17: 52
                  13
                  Quote: kare
                  The list above includes only official expulsions by official authorities.

                  Bravo! It’s time already to do this on the VO site ... They are getting creepy! laughing
                  1. Sirocco
                    Sirocco 26 January 2016 18: 03
                    12
                    Quote: MIKHAN
                    Bravo! It’s time already to do this on the VO site ... They are getting creepy!

                    And who will drive him out? He is a MONUMENT laughing
                3. Colonel
                  Colonel 26 January 2016 19: 22
                  10
                  Kare, great. I'll put it in my archive. And atalefu wish - after a tour of the history of "aggressive" Russia, please, about the "white and fluffy" West, or at least about "peacekeeping" Israel. How not to remember the popular wisdom about a speck in someone else's eye.
                4. Ami du peuple
                  Ami du peuple 26 January 2016 21: 24
                  -11 qualifying.
                  Quote: kare
                  To begin with, we will consider the well-known official expulsions of the Jews and analyze them, then we will consider
                  - time
                  Quote: kare
                  1348 - Repeated expulsion from Switzerland. In 1397, Jews were forbidden to live in Basel, in 1427.
                  -two
                  Quote: kare
                  1549 - a decree was signed on the expulsion of Jews from Austria. But this decree was not fully enforced and
                  -three
                  And each comment is a minimum of 1000 characters.
                  Listen, just leave a link - whoever needs it will read it. It looks like it's time for the moderators to set a limit on comments, well, at least five hundred characters. And then while you wade through such lengthy texts .. You can uncap and paste "War and Peace", for example. So what? Will this be your unique opinion? sorry hi
                  1. The comment was deleted.
          8. andj61
            andj61 26 January 2016 17: 17
            29
            Quote: atalef
            Background

            Greetings, Alexander! hi Well, you're burning! repeat
            It’s just called - a cow in the bathhouse! fellow
            From the fact that two-thirds are indicated - a minimum! - to put it mildly, not very true. wink
            For example, the Crimean War of 1853-1856.
            During the diplomatic conflict with France over the control of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, Russia, in order to exert pressure on Turkey, occupied Moldova and Wallachia, which were under the protectorate of Russia under the terms of the Adrianople Peace Treaty. The refusal of the Russian emperor Nicholas I to withdraw troops led to the declaration on October 4 (16), 1853 by Turkey, and after it Great Britain and France on March 15 (27), 1854, the war of Russia.

            Where is the aggression of Russia? what In my opinion, this is Turkey began the war ...
            And so - in so many cases. Suppression of the rebellions at home (North Caucasus and Poland) and among neighbors at the request of the legitimate ruler (Hungary) - is this aggression? The occupation of the territory of another state, the ruler of which Voluntarily signed an agreement on joining the empire with the provision of a lot of buns to this very ruler and his associates (Georgia - Kakheti, Imereti, Mingrelia, etc.) is also aggression? what
            Then the creation of the state of Israel - by your own standards - is all the more an aggression against the predominantly Arab population. And mind you - this is exactly the result of your, brought to the point of absurdity, "facts", and not at all my opinion. To refute the same on all points, to be honest, is simply lazy. winked drinks
            1. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 17: 35
              -18 qualifying.
              Quote: andj61
              Where is the aggression of Russia?

              Hey . Andrew.
              every war has preconditions and, of course, absolutely fair from the point of view of the attacking side and certainly treacherous and invasive from the point of view of the side under attack.
              there was one question - THE BEGINNING OF THE WAR - I gave a list of wars. which STARTED Russia.
              no more.

              Quote: andj61
              And so - in so many cases. Suppression of the rebellions at home (North Caucasus and Poland) and among neighbors at the request of the legitimate ruler (Hungary) - is this aggression?

              Watching whom to ask?
              here look ,
              North War
              . Russia regained control of the ancient Russian lands (estates) in the Baltic States, lost in the Time of Troubles.

              sort of liberating. lands were lost hell knows when.
              Then the question for Turkey climbing into Syria is the same ancient Turkish lands. which she lost 100 years ago, while they were her property for more than 500 years.
              touch upon Israel, Judea - which the Palaces consider their land - is the interesting name for the Palestinian lands - JEWISH?
              so in everything and from all sides.
              Therefore, I did not consider the aspect - aggression. I tried to choose only those wars and * special operations on previously captured (and there were such territories). as well as sending expeditionary corps to countries (which did not attack Russia. Let it be at the request of the local tsar) - I shared this.
              If there was a war and Russia was not attacked, then Russia began the war.
              It's just about the slogan
              - Russia never started wars.
              I started. nothing wrong with that.
              Everyone fought. all captured and as a rule with the help of military force.
              Such is the mudflow at a certain historical stage.
              IMHO. hi
              1. andj61
                andj61 26 January 2016 20: 29
                +5
                Quote: atalef
                Everyone fought. all captured and as a rule with the help of military force.
                Such is the mudflow at a certain historical stage.

                I completely agree with you - but only precisely with these theses. good
                Still, let's talk about the Crimean War: who was the aggressor there? Turkey declared war on Russia for certain actions of Russia against the Russian protectorate. And all this is due to Turkey’s actions regarding the church in Bethlehem. The usual relations between states - what aggression is there. But the fact that England, France and all sorts of Sardinia came to the Crimea with the war is really aggression.
                About the Northern War: can Russia be considered an aggressor only because it was a member of the Northern Union (Denmark, Poland, Saxony, Russia), which declared war on Sweden? What is aggression here?
                And this is exactly the case with at least two-thirds of the facts you cited. Of course, Russia both attacked and conquered. But someone brought in - for the sake of a word, the well-known phrase that Russia does not start wars, it ends them (and even altering that, they say, Russia did not act as an aggressor), and in response, you roll out the old one in the same way. an old list of "aggressive actions".
                But even that little word about Russia, and your list to the truth are quite distant ... request
                1. atalef
                  atalef 26 January 2016 21: 05
                  -6
                  Quote: andj61
                  But someone brought in - for the sake of a word, the well-known phrase that Russia does not start wars, it ends them (and even altering that, they say, Russia did not act as an aggressor), and in response, you roll out the old one in the same way. an old list of "aggressive actions".

                  Well, of course, I did not check every fact. Skopipestil (as expected) - and therefore said. do not bother, if something is not right - correct and we will come to a consensus, so to speak
                  But the people did not fall for a provocation, they say no, they did not fight and, as always, they reduced it to the Jewish question.
                  It became boring on the site, but there really was no one to argue with.
                  And for someone to carefully read the post, this is generally nonsense.
                  intelligence on the site falls at the rate of ruble devaluation. Sorry..

                  Quote: andj61
                  But even that word about Russia, and your list to the truth are quite distant

                  And the truth, Andrey, in general, is in the middle, namely, it’s not embarrassing to fight and the war starts the same (when required) —the fruits of the war are embarrassing ... and history is forgotten (calm down I’m not talking about Russia, but in general).
                  .
                  And replace true greatness and power with slogans and cheap propaganda.
                  Well, something like this.
                  1. andj61
                    andj61 26 January 2016 21: 32
                    +5
                    Quote: atalef
                    But the people did not fall for a provocation, they say no, they did not fight and, as always, they reduced it to the Jewish question.

                    good Class! You see, even provocations ceased to succeed! fellow
                    But it became boring on the site - you're right. Yes, and interesting publications are somehow smaller.
                    But to reduce the Jewish question to all the problems - this is the national Russian - and not only! - folk fun. And many are addicted to her. A people that does not even count 15 million (like, am I right?) Completely because of this, can consider itself great and powerful, even the greatest in the world! fellow
                    Quote: atalef
                    And the truth, Andrew, in general, is in the middle
                    The truth is somewhere near... bully
                2. vex
                  vex 28 January 2016 02: 24
                  +4
                  The Israeli is distorting large. Transcaucasia has always asked for itself in Russia, languishing under the yoke of Turks and Persians. Circassians and other highlanders engaged in the slave trade, selling captured Russian women, men, children to Turks. On the proposal to accept Russian citizenship, the Circassians refused and left for Turkey. The Turks themselves, the alien people in Asia Minor and the Armenian Highlands, have always been engaged in the extermination and suppression of Christian peoples, as well as Arabs. Wars with the West always began with him, and not with Russia.
                  This Russophobe counts on the fact that the Russian inhabitant does not know his story and will believe in any fraud.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. Orionvit
                Orionvit 28 January 2016 15: 56
                +1
                These are the analysts from Israel, then textbooks on the history of Russia write
            2. Volzhanin
              Volzhanin 26 January 2016 18: 22
              +7
              Ahead ... In general, if you delve into, in this list only 5% can be attributed to aggression with a stretch.
              There’s nothing to discuss.
              1. atalef
                atalef 26 January 2016 18: 26
                -8
                Quote: Volzhanin
                Ahead ... In general, if you delve into, in this list only 5% can be attributed to aggression with a stretch.

                well, not 5, maybe, but it’s also included in some discord with
                Russia never started wars.
                Or am I wrong? Sir wink
          9. McLuha-MacLeod
            McLuha-MacLeod 26 January 2016 17: 22
            +9
            You read the wrong story !?
            1. atalef
              atalef 26 January 2016 17: 52
              -9
              Quote: Ramzaj99
              atalef You forgot to add that the dinosaurs became extinct due to the Russians)))))

              Dinosaurs became extinct due to Ukrainians. they dug the black sea with their bones.
              I generally crap a little from the reaction of the people
              Well started the war. NK seized the territory - so what?
              Everyone has always done that, all countries. all the kings and empires were all expanded by fire and sword, including the Russian Empire.
              Or do you think that the same Yermak to the Chukchi or to whom else there cookies were distributed on their Maidan?
              War is a way of pursuing politics. politics then was like that. expand and Russia did not invent anything new in this.
              What is so terrible about this?
              Papuans ito fight. to capture the neighboring village. and what was worse than Russia?
              1. Ramzaj99
                Ramzaj99 26 January 2016 18: 04
                18
                Quote: atalef
                I generally crap a little from the reaction of the people

                Well, why run so far ??
                Let's take a closer look. Before this weekend, the UN announced that Israel is continuing the annexation of Palestinian fertile land, bulldozing Palestinian homes, and buildings built by the UN to help the homeless. Territory seizure in progress ......
                And in the world SILENCE ..... only the evil Putin roams the planet ......
                1. atalef
                  atalef 26 January 2016 18: 07
                  -14 qualifying.
                  Quote: Ramzaj99
                  Let's take a closer look. Before this weekend, the UN announced that Israel is continuing the annexation of Palestinian fertile land, bulldozing Palestinian homes, and buildings built by the UN to help the homeless. Extensive territories are being captured ......

                  And fuck, you're trying to prove it here. that we never won anything, we won - let them try to take laughing
                  1. Ramzaj99
                    Ramzaj99 26 January 2016 18: 14
                    14
                    Quote: atalef
                    Let’s try to take away

                    We, unlike you, fought for our land.
                    And you are parasitizing on a stranger, cringing from yourself saints. And yet there is enough arrogance to blame others for something.
                    1. atalef
                      atalef 26 January 2016 18: 22
                      -11 qualifying.
                      Quote: Ramzaj99
                      We, unlike you, fought for our land.

                      Let’s go through the war plan?
                      An interesting Arab land called Judea.
                      Or did Jesus live in Ukraine?
                      Quote: Ramzaj99
                      And you are parasitizing on a stranger, cringing from yourself saints.

                      parasitize 7 Is this how 7 Arabs feed us? belay
                      Quote: Ramzaj99
                      And yet there is enough arrogance to blame others for something.

                      Well, arrogance is the second happiness.
                      Although back to our sheep.
                      Russia at least once started a war or not?

                      I'm like in your profile picture. I have a brain.
                      1. sleeping sayan
                        sleeping sayan 26 January 2016 18: 31
                        -1
                        Still, the Tashkent front recall.
                      2. Ramzaj99
                        Ramzaj99 26 January 2016 18: 32
                        11
                        Quote: atalef
                        I'm like in your profile picture. I have a brain.

                        You are tormented by fucking.
                        We won’t talk about Ukraine ...... If someone wanted to capture something there, the militia would take Kiev a year ago. About Crimea, do not even stutter.
                        To parasitize, this is how Israel is doing now. The seizure of foreign lands is constantly ongoing, more and more Israeli villages are being built, moreover in the Palestinian places. And with all this, they still manage to blame Russia for something. I looked at your news here, probably there is no such Russophobia in the states.
                      3. atalef
                        atalef 26 January 2016 18: 38
                        -7
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        You are tormented by fucking.

                        Indeed, in the absence of an object - there is nothing to fuck
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        We won’t be talking about Ukraine ...... If someone wanted to capture something there, the militia would take Kiev a year ago. About Crimea, do not even stutter.

                        Yes, I generally Ukraine on the drum. coupled with the Crimea.

                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        To parasitize, this is how Israel is doing now. The capture of foreign lands is constantly underway

                        Aliens of which country?
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        and in the Palestinian places.

                        Is there such a country? belay
                        Has someone proclaimed it? Maybe she is a member of the UN?
                        When was it proclaimed?


                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        . And with all this, they still manage to blame Russia for something

                        I blame 7 In my opinion, Russia did the right thing, that it fought and expanded. without this it would have been in the borders of Muscovy
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        I looked at your news here, probably there is no such Russophobia in the states.

                        can I link?
                        Read the original in Hebrew? Or like American news. on AMERICAN laughing . language.?
                      4. Ramzaj99
                        Ramzaj99 26 January 2016 18: 52
                        +6
                        Quote: atalef
                        Is there such a country? Has someone proclaimed it? Maybe she is a member of the UN? When she was proclaimed?

                        If at the UN, they directly declare that ISRAEL IS GOING TO CAPTURE, FRUITLY PALESTINIAN MESTERIES, then I am deeply worried about who proclaimed whom and whom.
                        Unfortunately, there is no link. Maybe I'll find it later on YT. An interview with the Estonian President, with very interesting comments from Israeli "experts", I don't even want to repeat that nonsense ...
                        Well, about the "absence of an object" .... I did not get personal.
                      5. atalef
                        atalef 26 January 2016 18: 57
                        -6
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        If at the UN, they directly declare that ISRAEL IS GOING TO CAPTURE, FRUITLY PALESTINIAN MESTERIES, then I am deeply worried about who proclaimed whom and whom.

                        Well, the UN says the same about Crimea. and Abkhazia and Ossetia.
                        And that. that buggers and lesbians are normal and that. that Russia is an aggressor.
                        list to continue?
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        Link, unfortunately no

                        Jaal, master of lies. but read directly from the brain?
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        An interview with the Estonian President, with very interesting comments from Israeli "experts", I don't even want to repeat that nonsense ...

                        Estonia. It's Russia? (please read slowly. like a real Estonian.).

                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        Well, about the "absence of an object" .... I did not get personal.

                        So do I.
                      6. Ramzaj99
                        Ramzaj99 26 January 2016 19: 05
                        +9
                        Quote: atalef
                        Well, the UN says the same about Crimea. and Abkhazia and Ossetia. And that. that buggers and lesbians are normal and that. what is the aggressor. list to continue?

                        So I’m talking about this.
                        But this is strange .... When it comes to Russia, there is such a howl that even Satan seems better than Putin.
                        And when Israel ...... God’s chosen people ...... or rather an ally)))) and silence .....
                      7. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
          10. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Ramzaj99
    Ramzaj99 26 January 2016 17: 33
    +8
    Quote: atalef
    Background

    atalef You forgot to add that the dinosaurs became extinct due to the Russians)))))
    Now it’s fashionable, they’ll give a cookie.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. faridg7
    faridg7 26 January 2016 17: 33
    14
    Quote: atalef
    this is so, if in fact.

    Well, on the first point, Russia entered the already ongoing war (did not start it, but entered) between Sweden, Denmark and the Commonwealth.
    On the second point, this can generally be considered an episode of the Northern War - the Swedes sniffed with the Turks (Karl fled after the defeats in the possession of the Turks and entered into an agreement with them),
    I am sure that for almost every item further down the list you have a small, but a lie or a shortfall.
    1. atalef
      atalef 26 January 2016 17: 45
      -8
      Quote: faridg7
      Well, on the first point, Russia entered the already ongoing war (did not start it, but entered) between Sweden, Denmark and the Commonwealth.

      Of course, but the question was attacked by Russia in this war? No . hence the conclusion ....
      Quote: faridg7
      I am sure that for almost every item further down the list you have a small one, but a lie or an omission

      I have already mentioned . I do not touch the preconditions of war and even allied obligations.
      the slogan was
      DO NOT START WAR
      Started and climbed - like everything and always in the world.
      And what from this?
      1. Humpty
        Humpty 26 January 2016 17: 59
        +7
        Nothing that appears on the list, for example, a fortress that never existed in nature?
        With the union of n. n. the collective farm named after Budenny, created from the former Uzbek Basmachi, where one of the first Russians was the parents of the famous chief medical officer and my grandmother. They treated almost all-round syphilis.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Humpty
        Humpty 26 January 2016 21: 55
        0
        Arbogast is sorry for me and portions of chickpea on you.
      2. faridg7
        faridg7 27 January 2016 07: 09
        +2
        But, but, to accept the ambassador, do not get married and do not marry. If you don’t accept the embassy, ​​then who should you tell me that you are declaring war? And the guns, why not accept, if they brought it themselves. It would be foolish to refuse; these same guns would then be against the Russian troops and would stand. In general, the Europeans themselves ran into their own student. Peter carefully delved into the life of European states. So what they taught, then got
  5. Tjeck
    Tjeck 26 January 2016 17: 46
    +2
    How dare you post this ?! Here the majority prefers to believe Academician Fomenko and proverbs, to hell with a generally accepted story laughing Although your table is also overestimated by about 30 percent - war, rebellion and conflict are two different things.
  6. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 26 January 2016 18: 21
    +8
    Quote: atalef
    Military campaign against Sweden: 1741-1748

    Ahem ... if Russia started this war, then why was it declared by Sweden - the Russian ambassador in Stockholm?
    Quote: atalef
    War with Prussia: 1756-1762

    In pursuance of an alliance agreement with Austria and by virtue of the attack of Prussia on another Austrian ally - Saxony.
    So you and France and Britain blame the attack on Germany in 1939. smile
    Quote: atalef
    War with Sweden: 1788-1790

    Wow! That is, the invasion of the Swedish army on 21.06.1788 on the territory of Russia and the attack of Neyshlot is Russian aggression?

    this is so, if in fact. (C)
  7. Ostwest
    Ostwest 26 January 2016 18: 21
    +4
    And where is the shooting of sepoys or an attack on Hitler?
    Today, the attack on Syria and the barbaric bombing of Daesh in violation of all kinds of human rights.
    The same facts why omitted.
  8. bif
    bif 26 January 2016 18: 26
    +7
    Quote: atalef
    this is so, if in fact.

    So what? Where are the facts? Just with the help of copy paste historical events are listed and that's all ... I agree there are even wars on the list, but who started them and how? apparently this was not in the copy-paste. It is strange that after 1900's nothing was indicated, as if nothing had happened.
    I can also write about a country that has been fighting since its formation ..
    Israel 1948 - To the present - constant attacks on surrounding countries)))
    1. atalef
      atalef 26 January 2016 18: 32
      -9
      Quote: bif
      So what? Where are the facts? Just with the help of copy-paste historical events are listed and that's it

      Of course - war is a historical event with a name and dates
      Quote: bif
      . I agree there are even wars on the list, but who started them and how?

      read my posts.
      Quote: bif
      It is strange that after the 1900s nothing was indicated, as if nothing had happened.

      the conversation was about Russia. after 1917 was the USSR
      Quote: bif
      I can also write about a country that has been fighting since its formation ..
      Israel 1948 - Present - constant attacks on surrounding countries

      But from now on in more detail. especially in part - attacks on surrounding countries. hi
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 26 January 2016 18: 50
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        But from now on in more detail. especially in part - attacks on surrounding countries.

        Whose attack on the airfields started the Six Day War? Who decided to establish "Peace in Galilee"? wink
  9. Kite
    Kite 26 January 2016 18: 41
    16

    "and some background information from atalef (7"

    young, beat .. be! He even reproached the Crimean War! And the war with Sweden is one in which the Swedes under Poltava Well ... they kicked the forgivable was atalefsky laughing All the Turkish wars were the initiative of Russia, and not your relatives from London? Suppression of rebellions in the same list of aggressions wassat
    You have completely regained your tribal skills. Why are you bored and looking for communication with us?
  10. Zoldat_A
    Zoldat_A 26 January 2016 19: 11
    +5
    Quote: atalef

    Background
    The Northern War: 1700-1721
    [...]
    troops of Manchuria: 1900-1901

    this is so, if in fact.

    Good historical background ... Great background ... Only two points -

    At first - all these wars were somehow on the borders of the empire, therefore, had strategic importance for Russia. USA, for example, what stump forgot in Iraq?

    А Secondly, we are accustomed to the peculiar opinion of our Israeli comrades, and therefore I wonder how you, Alexander, did not add the "Soviet-German war of 1941-1945" to this list? So, isn't it called in Western textbooks today? Berlin was also "occupied" ... How the USSR "occupied" half of Europe, the whole world will remember tomorrow, if someone other than us remembers why exactly January 27 is celebrated as the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust ...

    It is from our memory that the cause of this sad anniversary cannot be cut down. And for all the rest, we are evil invaders, occupiers, and so on and so forth ... And we did nothing just in the world, but only we sleep and see how the whole world would be robbed, captured and made to work for itself ....

    Don't you confuse us with any other big country? Which for 33 stars from its borders does anyone bombard for the sake of the interests of their corporations?

    And if we had not "occupied" Crimea, it is natural that ANOTHER big country would not have occupied it like Japan or Germany, no! They would have planted gladioli on the flowerbeds and distributed free sweet nishtyaks for free.
    Confirmation of US intentions to dig in, as they say, in full growth in the territory of Crimea and Sevastopol was revealed during a study of the American portal of public procurement and tenders, where, in fact, a tender was posted for the repair of Sevastopol secondary school No. 5.

    According to information on the Federal Business Opportunity government procurement website, tender N33191-13-R-1240 was added on September 5, 2013 and canceled on April 15, 2014 "due to the current situation in Ukraine." Applications for participation in the tender were accepted until October 21, 2013. The US Navy Civil Engineering Command is listed as the customer in the tender. According to the information on the NAVFAC website, it is engaged in the design, construction and maintenance of facilities and the provision of infrastructure for various units of the US Navy.
    The Pentagon for the Sevastopol kids wanted to repair the school? Ah, what sweethearts ...

    How many are there on the map from Washington to Sevastopol? Significantly further than from Saratov to Bukhara or from Rostov to Tbilisi.
    1. atalef
      atalef 26 January 2016 19: 53
      -4
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      Firstly, all these wars were somehow on the borders of the empire, therefore, they were of strategic importance to Russia. USA, for example, what stump forgot in Iraq?

      Do not understand the connection with Iraq? The conversation was about the wars of Russia, further, about the borders, and where else can there be wars, if not at the borders, inside the country they are no longer wars. And something else
      Well, and thirdly - strategic interests - I agree, one of the interests is the expansion of the empire through wars of conquest.
      So what did I write wrong?


      Quote: Zoldat_A
      And secondly, we are accustomed to the peculiar opinion of our Israeli comrades, and therefore I am surprised how you, Alexander, did not add to this list the "Soviet-German war of 1941-1945"? So, isn't it called in Western textbooks today? Berlin is also "occupied by

      I don’t know how in the West, I haven’t read any textbooks (I’m sure that you are the same) - in Israel it is designated as World War II
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      And for everyone else, we are evil invaders, occupiers, and so on and so forth ...

      Why
      For me personally, no. and for many others the same.
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      Don't you confuse us with any other big country? Which for 33 stars from its borders does anyone bombard for the sake of the interests of their corporations?

      Come on without another slogan.
      A specific question was posed, I gave a specific answer to it (Did Russia start the war) - that you climb to me with propaganda.
      If there was a question about the USA, it would give the same concrete answer.

      Quote: Zoldat_A
      And if we had not "occupied" Crimea, it is natural that ANOTHER big country would not have occupied it like Japan or Germany, no! They would have planted gladioli on flower beds and handed out sweet nishtyaks for free.

      Crimea, in my opinion, has always been and should have remained a part of Russia.
      But after what happened next, especially in New Russia, it seems to me that NATO will no longer need Crimea, they will put their own missiles at the borders.


      Quote: Zoldat_A
      How many are there on the map from Washington to Sevastopol? Significantly further than from Saratov to Bukhara or from Rostov to Tbilisi.

      And aggression or not, is measured in kilometers?
      1. andj61
        andj61 26 January 2016 20: 42
        +5
        Quote: atalef
        Crimea, in my opinion, has always been and should have remained a part of Russia.

        good
        Quote: atalef
        But after what happened next, especially in New Russia, it seems to me that NATO will no longer need Crimea, they will put their own missiles at the borders.

        Come on, Alexander, the Russians are strong in their improvisation. lol In response, we do not need to deploy missiles in Cuba, in which case it’s enough just to blow them up on our own territory. belay The effect will be approximately the same - on the Earth, except that rats and cockroaches will remain, because nuclear weapons are not a means of war, but a means of deterrence. So it makes no sense for the Americans to deploy rockets near Kharkov: their vulnerability is high, and the US’s own security from this does not increase, but decreases.
  11. Disant
    Disant 26 January 2016 20: 33
    +7
    Atalef, where did this HISTORICAL SUMMARY come from?
    immediately on the first points:
    .
    The Prussian campaign of 1711 - an element of the Russian-Turkish war of 1710-1713. Turkey declared war in May 1710.
    .
    - sending troops to Khiva in 1711 - a research expedition with embassy powers of several thousand people. cut out
    .
    - The war with Persia 1722-1735 (in Russian - the first Persian campaign 1722-1723gg. No longer fought). in May 1722, Peter I went on a Persian campaign. The reason for it was the fact of the robbery in Persia of Russian merchants in the total amount of 500 thousand rubles. wild people.
    .
    The war with Turkey 1735-1739. violation by the Ports of the peace terms of the contract
    .
    - Military campaign against Sweden 1741-1748.
    (Russian-Swedish war 1741 - 1743). in July 1741, Sweden declared war on Russia. Russia was guilty of imposing sanctions.
    .

    and so on on the list
    1. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 28 January 2016 00: 20
      +1
      Quote: Disant
      - sending troops to Khiva in 1711 - a research expedition with embassy powers of several thousand people. cut out


      Here, in general, everything was fair, they crushed evil spirits like the current ISIS ...

      "The main tasks of the campaign, identified at a meeting of a special committee of the Asian Department in March 1839 [2], were to stop the Khiva raids on the territories controlled by the Russian Empire, to free Russian prisoners in the Khiva Khanate, to ensure safe trade and transit of goods ...
      The campaign was prepared and implemented by V. A. Perovsky, the Orenburg military governor and commander of the Separate Orenburg Corps since 1833. Perovsky was a supporter of Russia's active policy in Central Asia, due to the aggravation of the situation in this region in the 1830s. As I. Vitkevich, Adjutant of Perovsky, who was sent by him on an intelligence mission to Central Asia, wrote: "Now the power and influence of our administration extends almost no further than the borderline of the Urals and does not inspire any special respect for the Kaisaks or the regions of Central Asia." “From our caravan the Khivans took from Bukhara residents for 340 Bukhara chervonets, or 5440 rubles. As is known, they take from our Tatars twice against the Asians ... They untie bales of our Tatars, beat people and collect them with unheard-of oppression and abuse; from the untied bales they grab and drag goods in all directions ... ”. "If you look with your own eyes at these arbitrariness, of which hardly anyone in our country has any idea, then you should not be surprised at the stagnation of our Asian trade." "The Khivans travel along the Syr Darya, to the very Ak-Mechet of Tashkent, where Kuvan is separated from the Syr, and mercilessly plundered our Chumekeys who winter here and spend the summer on the Orenburg line between Orsk and Verkhneuralsk." "
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 27 January 2016 04: 09
    0
    Ambiguous presentation of information and just, that's the whole story. And here in Russia, I apologize either true or fiction. And please, do not confuse it with fairy tales. Russian folk tale too, the material is serious, but there is a completely different info-code, for different purposes. And don't worry so much, why? It's only the beginning! Have some sedatives, read your thorium at night, use "and It will pass!" ))
  14. vit357
    vit357 27 January 2016 21: 04
    0
    In the very first fact, there is already a lie and twisting))) teach materiel vyunosh))) By the way, the phrase from pedivikia: "Russia regained control over the ancient Russian lands (estates) in the Baltic states, lost in the Time of Troubles." I think there are no less surprises there)))
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. cumastra1
    cumastra1 28 January 2016 08: 46
    0
    Half of the above is self-defense. Part - protection of the Orthodox from genocide, part - preventive defense against "very peaceful Turkey", but what is the Crimean war doing here? A very interesting aggression on its own territory, against the Anglo-French national chess team? ... Are punitive expeditions also aggression, or a response to something else? And there remains only the Swedish war for the return of very disputed territories and a couple of khanates
  17. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 28 January 2016 10: 22
    +1
    According to the flag, you are the most respectable of those who, from year to year, from century to century, spoiled Russia, who constantly swapped black and white and who ultimately organized the most vile and despicable sabotage against the peoples of Russia called the October Revolution! All the abominations in the world are the result of the "activities" of international Zionism and your rigged statistics from the same "opera"! In all world wars, the financial groups play the main fiddle, and who heads them? -The most rabid Zionists! And again this brat is doing everything to bring Russia to its knees, gentlemen will not come out, soon you will all find yourself in the dustbin of history! OUR BUSINESS IS RIGHT, WE WILL WIN!
  18. star44
    star44 28 January 2016 14: 26
    +1
    This is a list of wars of the 18-20 centuries with the participation of Russia, and no more. Without an analysis of the offensive and / or defensive (response) nature of these wars, talking about their aggressiveness (or Russia's guilt at the beginning) is incorrect. So you can blame the USSR at the beginning of the war 22.06.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX, pitying Germany ... Although in its history almost every country in the world at one time or another waged aggressive wars, starting the war first ...
  19. Orionvit
    Orionvit 28 January 2016 15: 51
    0
    "" "This is so if in fact." "" You, dear, forget that for all these "facts", Russia was provoked and drawn into these wars by our Western "partners". This was done by the hands of neighbors and various aborigines who had already become part of Russia. Behind all the wars and uprisings in Russia that you have listed, the tail of a British lion almost always peeps out, in the face of British intelligence. That this is a struggle for spheres of influence between Russia and Europe has never been strongly denied in the West. And in conclusion, if not all these "facts" were eaten, then Russia would now be in the size of a Moscow principality, which has always been dreamed of and what our "friends" have always achieved.
  20. andrewkor
    andrewkor 28 January 2016 19: 22
    0
    The Crimean War was not unleashed by Russia, for example. All wars with Sweden after 1721. were revengeful on her part, reassured them only in 1809. and only then they joined Finland, but they could have been 100 years earlier. They generally bought Courland.
  • Saratoga833
    Saratoga833 26 January 2016 16: 59
    +5
    Quote: subbtin.725
    "Putin proposed to introduce the confiscation of the property of corrupt officials."

    This should have been done a long time ago! There will be guaranteed confiscation - there will be significantly less corruption. After all, it will not make much sense to steal, because the payback for theft is serious!
  • sever.56
    sever.56 26 January 2016 16: 38
    12
    Quote: cniza
    Let them now suffer and try to solve these mysterious Russians


    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/798/fuwy392.png

    If we troll them in the networks, then such people as people like V.Putin, S.V. Lavrov, N.Patrushev and other top officials troll them "live".
    And so it’s great to cope with that, for Western magazines and politicians
    it remains only to lift the jaw from the floor from impotence and inability
    object to something !!!
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 26 January 2016 18: 26
      0
      They have neither brains nor intellect to understand our humor. Dumb people-functions.
  • bornikrub
    bornikrub 26 January 2016 17: 21
    10
    Unlike the "mysterious" Russians, the "transparent" Jew from MK in every possible way demonstrates to potential donors concern about "imperial" ambitions, the return of Crimea, and the upholding of Russian interests.
    These nits did not show "concern" when, after the reunification of Germany, NATO brazenly seized eastern Europe, the Baltic states, and then discovered "interests" in the Caucasus, Ukraine, and Crimea.
    The inventors of fascism are Jews,
    the distributors are Germans,
    the main carriers are Anglo-Saxons.
    Liberal fascism is the mainstream of Anglo-Saxon ideology, since the "burden of the white man" (outright racism and Nazism) has been finally exposed.
    The core of liberal fascism is a group of owners of the largest transnational banks, corporations, and the media.
  • Will
    Will 26 January 2016 17: 25
    +2
    we are different.
    And this is strong.)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • vlad66
    vlad66 26 January 2016 16: 37
    22
    And thanks to the mattresses for Crimea, who owns it, he controls the Black Sea and dill was used by a stranger and Crimea is now at home.
    1. Vend
      Vend 26 January 2016 16: 43
      10
      Quote: vlad66
      And thanks to the mattresses for Crimea, who owns it, he controls the Black Sea and dill was used by a stranger and Crimea is now at home.

      Russia has managed to turn trouble for its own good. And it was more than once. I hope this will continue.
      1. akmalinin
        akmalinin 26 January 2016 21: 53
        +1
        It would be happiness, but not happiness helped.
  • Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 26 January 2016 16: 18
    19
    Yes, in Russia everything is fine with argumentation in all events. All in the framework of international law and the UN Charter.

    It’s uk-ry that will not be able to legitimize the February 2014 coup. As well as the Turks - aggression against Iraq and Syria. As well as the USA - in relation to 100500 countries.
    1. Dmitry 2246
      Dmitry 2246 26 January 2016 17: 56
      +2
      Nice to read elegant answers to provocative questions.
  • BOB044
    BOB044 26 January 2016 16: 19
    17
    Nikolai Patrushev in an interview with MK spoke out in favor of “thanking the USA for Crimea”
    The answer is in the top ten.
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 26 January 2016 16: 22
      17
      Quote: BOB044
      Nikolai Patrushev in an interview with MK spoke out in favor of “thanking the USA for Crimea”
      The answer is in the top ten.

      Nikolai Platonovich auditioned the Americans. Well, Ukrainians at the same time.
    2. akmalinin
      akmalinin 26 January 2016 21: 57
      0
      To bring this to the United States, so they would bite their own elbows. Probably already from 2014, they bite, they have already bitten to the bone.
  • oldseaman1957
    oldseaman1957 26 January 2016 16: 20
    18
    Russia received Crimea due to the fact that the current American strategists, one might say, snickered. They didn’t even want to think about Russia's response to events in Ukraine. That got it!
    1. SklochPensioner
      SklochPensioner 26 January 2016 16: 42
      +7
      Even shorter:
      Usa just wanted Crimea, but did not want to think smile
  • Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 26 January 2016 16: 21
    +7
    I personally am also grateful ... And they will give Alaska then I think they will say thanks ... tongue
    1. Gormenghast
      Gormenghast 26 January 2016 16: 36
      13
      There was a bad tendency to change previously signed contracts, contracts, agreements unilaterally.

      France did not deliver the Mistral. Ukraine has changed the rate of gas transit. 100500 business dealers cite illegal sanctions and shrug.

      And if the Alaskan treaty is subject to revision? Type bonded? am

      And, I forgot, this is only ideological shit and terry liberals can. laughing
  • Starik72
    Starik72 26 January 2016 16: 24
    10
    Well done Patrushev, adequately answered reporters !!! Clearly, specifically and without hysteria !!!
  • Pak_c_TonopoM
    Pak_c_TonopoM 26 January 2016 16: 25
    13
    After these words, the president cried somewhere in the USA)))))))
    1. Abbra
      Abbra 26 January 2016 16: 39
      +8
      And in the icy desert of Nevada, coyotes began to howl at him ... wassat
      1. Igor Polovodov
        Igor Polovodov 26 January 2016 18: 14
        +1
        Even pissed his feet)))
  • The comment was deleted.
  • vobels
    vobels 26 January 2016 16: 36
    +2
    "..for the reunification of Crimea and Sevastopol with Russia, thank the United States .." How politely, subtly and ironically he squandered the stars! Well, just done! That's how you need to "thank" them!
  • Ostwest
    Ostwest 26 January 2016 16: 41
    +8
    Patrushev’s answer is concise, but I think too much. One could also mention the focus of the Americans on the Crimea and their desire instead of our base to patch up their next base there and on duty to accuse us of aggressiveness.
    A base aimed at Russia, and it is impossible to allow such a thing, not at all .. The Americans were completely overwhelmed, I suspect that some people were speechless from our actions. For a long time, the United States did not insert this way.
    Of course, the development of the Crimea is a little expensive, but in the future everything will return to normal, especially since it has always been RUSSIAN, but the Ukrainians have forgotten their Russian ancestors.
  • Vladislav 73
    Vladislav 73 26 January 2016 16: 41
    +9
    Today there was a press conference of Sergey Lavrov, there are also endless questions - Crimea, Ukraine, annexation ... In the West, what, are there few problems? Do you already have a roof in your house, but still the fire will not cry, and even they strive to look at a neighbor, threaten with a finger, like, I’m watching you! Indeed, liberal logic is the absence of any logic! request
  • sw6513
    sw6513 26 January 2016 16: 47
    +2
    In principle, he was right — there was no maidan — there would be no Crimea. Thanks to the amers and their sixes.
  • Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 26 January 2016 16: 47
    +3
    We will thank the United States when they return Alaska to us!
    1. tolancop
      tolancop 26 January 2016 16: 58
      +3
      If they are planning to return Alaska (das ist fantastisch!), Then, IMHO, we should refuse ... We wouldn’t hurt to learn what e; t is.
      And protect from other people's claims.
  • olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 26 January 2016 16: 51
    +6
    The United States does not want to admit that its authority is melting like a snowman in May:
    Crimean residents abandoned the country, which the world hegemon decided to take control of, which should not surprise the states.
    Just need to remember: earlier visits by the US Navy were not at all greeted by a cordial welcome in the Crimea.
  • Arktidianets
    Arktidianets 26 January 2016 16: 52
    +4
    For a word I didn’t reach my pocket, handsome! good
  • Dimontius
    Dimontius 26 January 2016 17: 03
    13
    You know how to please us!
  • polite people
    polite people 26 January 2016 17: 04
    +3
    Friendly the whole country in chorus. Thanks to Uncle Sam for our victory with Crimea. drinks
  • SAF
    SAF 26 January 2016 17: 07
    +1
    From an interview with Nikolai Patrushev:

    Crimea joined the Russian Federation not because Russia wanted it, but because the population of the peninsula held a referendum and decided by an absolute majority of votes: we want to live as part of Russia, not as part of Ukraine.

    Russia supposedly did not want to yet, but the population (at that time - not Russian) decided ...

    Strange logic.
    I have nothing against the annexation of Crimea - only for - 100500+.

    In this way, any state or autonomous entity can join Russia.

    Desire must be mutual !!!!
    1. Alexander_
      Alexander_ 27 January 2016 18: 40
      +1
      The logic is logical.
      "..not because Russia wanted it" does not mean Russia's unwillingness to join.

      "In this way, any state or autonomous entity can join Russia."
      Let them hold referendums, Russia will consider ..
      Some individually receive citizenship of the Russian Federation, where referenda are not ripe))

      Ukraine wants to join the EU, they don’t take it for some reason. Turkey also wants for a long time, and also do not take. Probably considered. The EU only needs refugees.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • samarin1969
    samarin1969 26 January 2016 17: 20
    +6
    on my own behalf, I thank for the Crimea the militiamen who stood on Chongar, the citizens of Sevastopol, women and men who did not get scared in the anti-Tatar crush in February 2014, Aksenov, Chaly, Polonskaya .... and a pixel green surprise when I came to work ... (first time in life so pleasantly surprised!)

    I will not thank the USA for Crimea.
    1. Asadullah
      Asadullah 26 January 2016 17: 46
      +2
      I will not thank the USA for Crimea.


      We must thank the Right Sector, they so skillfully frightened the population that the choice was clear. It’s a pity that they didn’t capture Rada, the old woman would not have to suffer so long.
      1. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 28 January 2016 00: 24
        +1
        Quote: Asadullah
        We must thank the Right Sector, they so skillfully frightened the population that the choice was clear. It’s a pity that they didn’t capture Rada, the old woman would not have to suffer so long.

        But nothing has ended yet. They are trying there to the full. Now the population is being terrified to the fullest. Robbery and raiding is now the national sport of Ukraine.
  • guznorodov
    guznorodov 26 January 2016 17: 26
    0
    Yes, they went, let them want to think it’s time to generally not respond to this and do not make excuses. And then we will hold a referendum in Alaska.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 26 January 2016 17: 59
    +4
    And most importantly, CRIMEA was squeezed out without a single shot and everything was in accordance with the law! Brilliant operation .. (this is for atalef note) Learn Israel!
    1. atalef
      atalef 26 January 2016 18: 03
      -4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      And most importantly, CRIMEA was squeezed out without a single shot and everything was in accordance with the law! Brilliant operation .. (this is for atalef note) Learn Israel!

      Mikhan, and why the hell is the Crimea for us?
      we have enough of our hemorrhoids.
      Yes, at that time, in Ukraine, anyone and anything was overcome.
      Yes, Moldovans. if you wanted to. laughing
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 26 January 2016 18: 13
        +3
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: MIKHAN
        And most importantly, CRIMEA was squeezed out without a single shot and everything was in accordance with the law! Brilliant operation .. (this is for atalef note) Learn Israel!

        Mikhan, and why the hell is the Crimea for us?
        laughing

        Well, under Stalin, there were behind-the-scenes conversations ... Birobidzhan was given to you (but no one lives there)))) That was allowed into Palestine ...
        And the eternal battle, the peace of the Arabs only dreams ... hi
        1. atalef
          atalef 26 January 2016 18: 15
          -6
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Well, under Stalin there were backstage conversations ... Birobidzhan was given to you

          Take it back.
          Quote: MIKHAN
          That was allowed into Palestine ...

          Who let it go?
          Quote: MIKHAN
          And the eternal battle, the peace of the Arabs only dreams.

          Well, at least dream. already good.
  • demo
    demo 26 January 2016 18: 27
    +2
    From an interview with Nikolai Patrushev:
    Crimea joined the Russian Federation not because Russia wanted it, but because the population of the peninsula held a referendum and decided by absolute majority: we want to live as part of Russia, and not as part of Ukraine.

    Not a solid answer.
    As if justified.
    Finally.
    Russia has returned its. For this, we scooped up sanctions.
    An eye for an eye. Tooth by tooth.
    Stop making excuses!
    A normal RUSSIAN leader in Russia should have a Collection of Russian Lands in his blood.

    Well, if you speculatively assume that Alaska will express a desire to join Russia, what will we take?
    Or Finland part?
  • Stauffenberg
    Stauffenberg 26 January 2016 18: 36
    +1
    Again, they want to ask Russia for something. The claims on the Caucasus and Central Asia, where slavery and state banditry were eliminated, are especially touching. It is especially interesting to hear this from a person whose country, in a very recent past, took the lands of neighboring states by military force, waged preventive wars and actively intervened in the politics of not only the Middle East, but the whole world. Not in the 18th century.
    1. atalef
      atalef 26 January 2016 18: 42
      -5
      Quote: Stauffenberg
      It is especially interesting to hear this from a person whose country, in a very recent past, has taken land from neighboring states by military force

      After they attacked her - probably worth noting
      Well, it's kind of like Koenigsberg or the smokers.
      or does the analogy not match?
      Quote: Stauffenberg
      led a preventive war

      Example
      Quote: Stauffenberg
      actively intervened in politics not only in the Middle East, but throughout the world

      The whole universe.
      1. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 28 January 2016 00: 41
        +2
        Alexander, what you threw straight from the Internet without reading this list is "aggressive", that's understandable ...
        After everything I read, I was interested in another thought ... And where did the Jews live before the Egyptian captivity? Where is their native land and who lives there now? Why did Moses not lead them home from slavery? And for 40 years, a hefty amount of people should be taken along this heel too manage ...
        No trick question. Just interesting.
  • MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 26 January 2016 19: 00
    +2
    Well, who else is atalefa ??? All the facts are exhausted, where is my ... laughing
    1. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 26 January 2016 22: 32
      0
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Well, who else is atalefa ??? All the facts are exhausted, where is my ...

      Atalef, like that gopher from the movie about our army, he is, but I have not seen him in the tape for a month now, if not more and not only him, not a single Jew. Apparently they are the whole Codla, they sent me to the black list. Friendly pancake.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • konvalval
    konvalval 26 January 2016 19: 21
    +1
    Quote: jjj
    It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship

    "Order of Friendship of the Papuans"
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 26 January 2016 19: 53
      +2
      Quote: konvalval
      Quote: jjj
      It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship

      "Order of Friendship of the Papuans"

      Our man Obamych! (only to anyone ..)))
  • Ros64
    Ros64 26 January 2016 21: 18
    0
    I ask you to explain the experts - why so many centuries Jews were expelled from so many countries? And who are the Jews, everywhere in the world - Jews, Yude, Jews, and for some reason, in Russia, Jews are who?
  • Ros64
    Ros64 26 January 2016 21: 23
    +3
    Maybe because they are such a people who cannot live normally with other nations? Therefore, they were driven from everywhere? And now they have arranged NATIONALISM in Israel - they calculate how many percent of "precious Jewish" blood a person has and how many percent is he "chosen by God" ?!
  • 4ekist
    4ekist 26 January 2016 22: 14
    0
    Quote: jjj
    It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship

    He has already been awarded the Peace Prize. Enough with him.
  • Nitarius
    Nitarius 27 January 2016 06: 06
    0
    A PAIR of Satan RS-26 missiles under its own power .. WILL THIS GRATITUDE GO? for DONBASS, etc.
  • Wolka
    Wolka 27 January 2016 08: 14
    0
    Patrushev is a wise man and knows his job ...
  • jonht
    jonht 27 January 2016 08: 25
    0
    Quote: jjj
    It is necessary to award Obama with the Order of Friendship

    Moreover, posthumous and so be it with relying military honors .... re-shooting a lifeless body ....
  • Thompson
    Thompson 27 January 2016 10: 10
    +3
    Quote: atalef
    Well, of course, I did not check every fact. Skopipestil (as expected) - and therefore said. do not bother, if something is not right - correct and we will come to a consensus, so to speak

    Cool! The main thing is to blurt out?
    Then you can safely ignore all your posts. Good inscriptions from fences can not be skeptical
  • dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 27 January 2016 16: 49
    +1
    Absolutely correct! In the case of Crimea, one can once again see how you can use the tensions of enemies against them and for your own benefit. This is the height of art. Any aggressive attempts should be used to your advantage, like Aikido art. The more the enemy attacks, the more we gain!
  • pamero
    pamero 27 January 2016 17: 31
    +1
    here is interesting this journalist from "MK" the future of his children with which country connects stating YOU TAKE! After all, people like him hit the power in Russia and end up in the very Country of Russia. We went through this in 1917. smart people in the press !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • galakt
    galakt 28 January 2016 00: 38
    +1
    They drove burrs from Russia from time immemorial. They didn’t let go of White Russia. But they all the same climbed snake, flew a fly and invaded the Slavic lands. In 1917, for all their ordeals, they took revenge on the Slavs, but then they suddenly became enemies of the people. In each nation, there are enough dexterous individuals on hand and mind. I don’t think that the Russians are such a warlike people, it’s the farmers who knew how to work. But there were always those who envied them, raided, robbed and burned settlements, led women into slavery. Without obvious reason, the Russians did not fight. And why did Ivan the Terrible go to fight Kazan? And why did the Russians come to the Crimea and to the Black Sea. And why did they come to the Caucasus, is there gold mines there, or was oil already fountaining then? Please explain the reasons for all the wars conducted by Russia, Russia, the USSR. Hey, historical incident, fulfill the request.
    1622 - attack on the Indians in Jamestown.
    1635-1636 - war with the Algokin Indians in New England.
    1675-1676 - war with the Indians, ending in the destruction of almost half of the cities in Massachusetts.
    1792 - war for the capture of Kentucky.
    1796 - The Tennessee Capture War.
    1797-1800 - pirate attacks on French civilian ships.
    1800 is a slave uprising led by Gabriel Prosser in Virginia. About a thousand people were hanged, including Prosser himself. The slaves themselves did not kill a single person.
    1803 - War for the capture of Ohio.
    1803 - war for the capture of Louisiana.
    1805-1815 - The war in Africa for the rights of the United States to distribute drugs in the world.
    1806 is an attempt of the American invasion of the Rio Grande (then - Spanish possession).
    1810 is an invasion of Spanish West Florida.
    1812-1814 - the war with England, the invasion of Canada.
    1813 - the capture of the Spanish Gulf Mobile, the occupation of the Marquesas Islands.
    1814 - the occupation of the Spanish Pensacola.
    1816 is an attack on Fort Nichols in Spanish Florida.
    to be continued....
  • galakt
    galakt 28 January 2016 00: 39
    0
    1817-1819 - Occupation of East Florida.
    1824 is the invasion of the Puerto Rican city of Fajardo.
    1824 - landing of the American landing in Cuba.
    1833 - the invasion of Argentina.
    1835 - Capture of Mexican Texas.
    1835 - the invasion of Peru.
    1840 - Invasion of Fiji.
    1841 - genocide on the island of Upolu (Drummond).
    1843 - the invasion of China.
    1846-1848 - war with Mexico.
    1846 - aggression against New Granada (Colombia).
    1849 - Indochina shelling.
    1852 - the invasion of Argentina.
    1853-1856 - the invasion of China.
    1853 - the invasion of Argentina and Nicaragua.
    1854 - the destruction of the Nicaraguan city of San Juan del Norte.
    1854 - an attempt to capture the Hawaiian Islands.
    1855 - the invasion and coup in Nicaragua.
    1855 - the invasion of Fiji and Uruguay.
    1856 - the invasion of Panama.
    1858 - intervention in Fiji, genocide.
    1858 - the invasion of Uruguay.
    1859 - attack on the Japanese fort Taku.
    1859 - the invasion of Angola.
  • galakt
    galakt 28 January 2016 00: 40
    0
    1860 - the invasion of Panama.
    1863 - a punitive expedition to Shimonoseki (Japan).
    1864 - military expedition to Japan.
    1865 - invasion of Paraguay, genocide.
    1865 - Panama intervention, coup d'etat.
    1866 - attack on Mexico.
    1866 is a punitive expedition to China.
    1867 - attack on the Midway Islands.
    1868 - multiple invasions of Japan.
    1868 - the invasion of Uruguay and Colombia.
    1874 - the introduction of troops in China and Hawaii.
    1876 - the invasion of Mexico.
    1878 - attack on Samoa.
    1882 - the introduction of troops in Egypt.
    1888 - attack on Korea.
    1889 is a punitive expedition to Hawaii.
    1890 - the introduction of troops in Haiti.
    1890 - the introduction of troops in Argentina.
    1891 - intervention in Chile.
    1891 is a punitive expedition to Haiti.
    1893 - the introduction of troops in Hawaii, the invasion of China.
    1894 - intervention in Nicaragua.
    1894-1896 - the invasion of Korea.
    1894-1895 - war in China.
    1895 - the invasion of Panama.
    1896 - the invasion of Nicaragua.
    1898 - capture of the Philippines, genocide.
    1898 - the invasion of the port of San Juan del Sur (Nicaragua).
    1898 - Capture of the Hawaiian Islands.
    1899-1901 - war with the Philippines.
    1899 - invasion of the Bluefields port of Nicaragua.
    1901 - the introduction of troops in Colombia.
    1902 - the invasion of Panama.
    1903 - the entry of troops into Honduras, the Dominican Republic, Syria.
    1904 - the entry of troops into Korea, Morocco.
    1904-1905 - intervention in the Russo-Japanese War.
    to be continued...
  • galakt
    galakt 28 January 2016 00: 42
    0
    1905 - Intervention in the Revolution in Honduras.
    1905 - the deployment of troops to Mexico.
    1905 - the introduction of troops in Korea.
    1906 - the invasion of the Philippines.
    1906-1909 - the invasion of Cuba.
    1907 - operations in Nicaragua.
    1907 - Intervention in the Revolution in the Dominican Republic.
    1907 - participation in the war of Honduras with Nicaragua.
    1908 - the invasion of Panama.
    1910 - the invasion of the Bluefields and Corinto (Nicaragua).
    1911 - Intervention in Honduras.
    1911 - Genocide in the Philippines.
    1911 - the introduction of troops in China.
    1912 - capture of Havana (Cuba).
    1912 - Intervention in Panama during the election.
    1912 - the invasion of Honduras.
    1912-1933 - the occupation of Nicaragua.
    1914 - intervention in the Dominican Republic.
    1914-1918 is a series of invasions of Mexico.
    1914-1934 - the occupation of Haiti.
    1916-1924 - the occupation of the Dominican Republic.
    1917-1933 - the occupation of Cuba.
    1918-1922 - the occupation of the Russian Far East.
    1918-1920 - the entry of troops into Panama.
    1919 - landing of troops in Costa Rica.
    1919 - war against the Serbs in Dalmatia on the side of Italy.
    1919 - Intervention in Honduras during the election.
    1920 - intervention in Guatemala.
    1922 - intervention in Turkey.
    1922-1927 - intervention in China.
    1924-1925 - the invasion of Honduras.
    1925 - military action in Panama.
    1926 - the invasion of Nicaragua.
    1927-1934 - the occupation of China.
    1932 - the invasion of El Salvador.
    1936 - intervention in Spain.
    1937 - intervention in Nicaragua, coup d'etat.
    1939 - the introduction of troops in China.
    1941-1945 - genocide of the civilian population of Germany (Dresden, Hamburg).
    1945 - a nuclear attack on Japan.
    1945-1991 - sabotage activity against the USSR. (The invasion of air possession - more than 5000, parachute landing - more than 140, direct sabotage. The total budget - 13 trillions of dollars).
    1946 - punitive operations in Yugoslavia.
    1946-1949 - the bombing of China.
    1947-1948 - recolonization of Vietnam, genocide.
    1947-1949 - military operations in Greece.
    1948-1953 - military operations in the Philippines.
    1948 - military coup in Peru.
    1948 - military coup in Nicaragua.
    1948 - A military coup in Costa Rica.
    1949-1953 - attempts to overthrow the government in Albania.
    1950 - Punitive Operations in Puerto Rico.
    1950-1953 - intervention in Korea.
    1951 - military assistance to Chinese rebels.
    1953-1964 - power special operations in British Guyana.
    1953 - the overthrow of Mossadyk, who received in the referendum 99.9% of the vote.
    1953 - Forced Deportation of Inuit (Greenland).
    1954 - The overthrow of the government in Guatemala.
    1956 - the beginning of military assistance to Tibetan rebels in the fight against China.
    1957-1958 is an attempt to overthrow the government in Indonesia.
    1958 - occupation of Lebanon.
    1958 - The bombing of Indonesia.
    1959 - the introduction of troops in Laos.
    1959 - punitive operations in Haiti.
    1960 - military operations in Ecuador.
    1960 - invasion of Guatemala.
    1960 - Support for a military coup in El Salvador.
    1960-1965 - interference in the internal affairs of the Congo. Mobutu support.
    1961-1964 - a military coup in Brazil.
    1961 - terrorist war against Cuba.
    1962 - punitive operations in Guatemala.
    1963-1966 - coup d'état and punitive operations in the Dominican Republic.
    1964 is a punitive operation in Panama.
    1964 - support for the coup in Brazil.
    1964-1974 - interference in the internal affairs of Greece.
    1965 - coup in Indonesia, genocide.
    1965-1973 - aggression against Vietnam.
    1966 - intervention in Guatemala.
    1967 - support for the coup and the subsequent fascist regime in Greece.
    1971-1973 - the bombing of Laos.
    1971 - American military assistance during the coup in Bolivia.
    1972 - the introduction of troops in Nicaragua.
    1973 - the coup in Chile.

    to be continued...
  • galakt
    galakt 28 January 2016 00: 43
    +1
    1980-1992 - military presence in El Salvador, special operations, genocide.
    1980 - support and financing of the Khmer Rouge.
    1980 - Operation Gladio in Italy, 86 casualties.
    1980 is a punitive operation in South Korea.
    1981 is an attempted coup in Zambia.
    1982 - interference in the internal affairs of Suriname.
    1982-1983 - attack on Lebanon.
    1982 - Genocide Support in Guatemala.
    1983 - intervention in Grenada.
    1983 - Interventions in the internal affairs of Angola.
    1984 - Two Iranian aircraft shot down.
    1984 - mining of the bays of Nicaragua.
    1985 - financing of the genocide in Chad.
    1986 - attack on Libya.
    1986-1987 - attack on an Iranian ship in international waters, the destruction of the Iranian oil platform.
    1987-1988 - participation in the Iraq war against Iran, the use of chemical weapons.
    1973 - Terror in Uruguay.
    1974 - support for Mobotu mode in Zaire.
    1974 - preparation of aggression in Portugal.
    1974 is an attempted coup in Cyprus.
    1975 - the occupation of Western Sahara, the introduction of troops in Morocco.
    1975 - Intervention in Australia's internal affairs.
    1975 - attack on Cambodia.
    1975-1989 - support for the genocide in East Timor.
    1988 - explosion of a Pan American passenger aircraft over Scotland. The guilt was recognized in 2003.
    1988 - the invasion of Honduras.
    1988 - Destruction of an Iranian passenger plane.
    1989 - intervention in Panama.
    1989 - bombing in the Philippines.
    1989 is a punitive operation in the Virgin Islands.
    1990 - the naval blockade of Iraq.
    1991 - aggression against Iraq.
    1991 - Kuwait bombing.
    1992-1994 - the occupation of Somalia.
    1992 - genocide and terror in the seizure of the natural wealth of Angola.
    1993-1995 - the bombing of Yugoslavia.
    1994-1996 - terror against Iraq.
    1998 - destruction by a missile strike of a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan.
    1998 - bombing of Iraq.
    1999 - aggression against Yugoslavia.
    2001 - the invasion of Afghanistan.
    2004 - troop deployment in Haiti.
    2008 - the invasion of Pakistan.
    2008 - The war in South Ossetia.
    2011 - The war in Libya.
    2013 - The war in Syria.
    2014 - The war in Ukraine.
    2015 - ??? Hmm Syria
  • zenith
    zenith 28 January 2016 10: 19
    0
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: subbtin.725
    Historical note: Russia never started wars

    Background
    The Northern War: 1700-1721
    Prussian campaign: 1711
    Sending troops to Khiva: 1717
    Expedition to the Lower reaches: 1722-1724
    War with Persia: 1725-1733
    War with the Commonwealth: 1733-1734
    Hike to the Rhine: 1735
    War with Turkey: 1735-1739
    Military campaign against Sweden: 1741-1748
    Sending Prince Repnin to the Rhine: 1748
    War with Prussia: 1756-1762
    War with the Commonwealth: 1769-1772
    War with Turkey: 1769-1774
    War with Turkey: 1787-1791
    War with Sweden: 1788-1790
    War with the Commonwealth: 1794
    War with Persia: 1796
    War with France: 1798-1799
    Suppression of the uprising of Tadeusz Kostyushki: 1794
    The Russo-Austro-French War, where the Russian army is fighting in Italy: 1798-1802
    The occupation of Kartli, Kakheti, Georgia: 1801
    The Occupation of Megrelia, Georgia: 1803
    The Russian-Iranian war, which entailed the occupation of Azerbaijan, part of Dagestan, and the capture of the Ganja Khanate: 1804-1813.
    Russian-Austro-French War: 1805
    Russian-Prussian-French war: 1806-1807
    The Russian-Swedish war, which led to the occupation of Finland: 1807-1809
    Punitive expedition against the Circassians, which ended practically with their actual extermination: 1822-1826.
    Capture of the Erivan and Nakhichevan Khanates: 1826-1828
    The Russian-Turkish war, which led to the occupation of the Caucasian coast of the Black Sea to Batumi: 1828-1829.
    The creation of the Lezghin line of fortresses in the Caucasus, the suppression of the rebellion of the Murids, the suppression of uprisings in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus: 1830-1831.
    Military expedition to the Trans-Kuban and Accident: 1834
    The war against Shamil in the Caucasus: 1837-1840.
    Breakthrough of the rebelled Highlanders in Kabarda and Kakheti: 1846
    Russian military intervention in Hungary, capture of Shamil Kazikuhum: 1848-1849
    Creation of the Rupa line of fortresses, suppression of the Circassian uprising: 1850-1851
    Crimean War: 1853-1856
    Russian invasion of Central Asia: 1860
    Capture of the fortresses of Pishek and Suzak in Uzbekistan: 1862-1863
    the final conquest of Abkhazia, the capture of the cities of Aliye-Ata, Chimkent in Central Asia: 1863-1864.
    Shturm Russian troops of Tashkent, the invasion of the Bukhara Khanate, the capture of Samarkand and other large settlements: 1865-1868.
    The conquest of the Khivan Khanate: 1868-1872
    The landing of Russian troops on the shore of the Caspian Sea, the beginning of the invasion of Turkmenistan: 1869
    The capture of the Ili region from China, the foundation of Vladivostok as the base of the Far Eastern flotilla: 1871. Suppression of the uprisings of Uzbeks and Kyrgyz, occupation of Sakhalin: 1873-1876.
    The Russian-Turkish war, the suppression of uprisings in Chechnya and Dagestan: 1877-1878.
    Capture of the fortresses of Geok Tepe and Ashgabat: 1881
    The final conquest of Turkmenistan: 1883-1885
    Russian-Afghan military incident due to Kushka: 1885
    Russian occupation of the Pamirs and Primorsky Territory: 1885-1895
    The expansion of Russia in Northeast China, the suppression of the uprising in Uzbekistan: 1896-1898
    Suppression of Ihethuan Rebellion: 1899
    Russian-Anglo-German-American intervention in China, Russian occupation of Manchuria: 1900-1901

    this is so, if in fact.
    "

    Where did you grab. So long we do not remember.
  • kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 28 January 2016 11: 05
    +1
    Already sick of these "accusers of Russia", but I want to remind everyone on what "history" they rely on! Much has been said about the fact that crowds of burr-out crowds always "climbed" to us, but remember that we were deprived of the real History by all these newcomers, who in Russia, due to their ignorance of our language, called everyone en masse "dumb" or "Germans" looking at the origin! So all these rogues and adventurers did everything to take away the historical past from Russia and created its history starting with the "Varangians", and before them there seemed to be nothing on our lands! It was not for nothing that the Great Russian Scientist Mikhailo Lomonosov repeatedly beat at meetings of the Academy of Sciences these falsifiers, and now, taking advantage of the moment, the descendants of the "destroyers of Russia" come out with "incriminating facts" which, incidentally, were falsified by their ancestors! initially doomed to lose! And what did they do with the cheaters in Russia in a decent society, but they were simply beaten in the stupid head with candelabra!
  • Orionvit
    Orionvit 28 January 2016 16: 06
    0
    Quote: vex
    The Israeli is distorting large. Transcaucasia has always asked for itself in Russia, languishing under the yoke of Turks and Persians. Circassians and other highlanders engaged in the slave trade, selling captured Russian women, men, children to Turks. On the proposal to accept Russian citizenship, the Circassians refused and left for Turkey. The Turks themselves, the alien people in Asia Minor and the Armenian Highlands, have always been engaged in the extermination and suppression of Christian peoples, as well as Arabs. Wars with the West always began with him, and not with Russia.
    This Russophobe counts on the fact that the Russian inhabitant does not know his story and will believe in any fraud.

    Well, not everyone left, go to the Caucasus in the same Karachay-Cherkessia, and see how many Circassians have left. On the contrary, you won't find a Russian there. So it is with all "oppressed peoples" who have all retained their native language and territory of residence. And mind you, no one was destroyed, unlike the Indians or Australian aborigines. I completely agree with you, and I am amazed that someone else has the audacity to accuse Russia of aggression.
  • Mirovey dodson
    Mirovey dodson 29 January 2016 15: 15
    0
    Frozen, fake questioning? And whose journal will there be? How is the surname? where he studied, further on the list. The country must, must, and know such heroes. Well, not Kasyanov, really!
  • bordos
    bordos 29 January 2016 15: 17
    0
    Quote: subbtin.725
    January 26 2016 16:36
    Historical note: Russia never started wars, our historical mission of the war is to end.


    Quote: atalef
    January 26 2016 16:43
    Background


    Quote: Sober
    Quote: atalef
    this is so, if in fact.

    the author did a great job. And yet he’s not right.

    great job
    and in just 7 minutes yes