Ukrainian antimonopolschiki ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier

102
The Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU) stated that Gazprom is obliged to eliminate violations in the field of gas transit in the coming months, reports Lenta.ru report report of the press service of the committee.

Ukrainian antimonopolschiki ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier


“It is obligatory for PJSC Gazprom (Moscow, the Russian Federation) within two months from the date of receipt of the decision to terminate the violation by ensuring receipt of services for the transit of natural gas through trunk pipelines through the territory of Ukraine from NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine on reasonable terms,” states in the release.

A week ago, Kiev made a decision to fine Gazprom with $ 3,47 billion for violating antitrust laws. “We are talking about the abuse of the monopoly position on the market for the transit of natural gas through trunk pipelines through the territory of Ukraine,” said the head of the committee Terentyev.

At Gazprom, this decision was surprising. They recalled that they did not conduct business on the Ukrainian territory, transferring Naftogaz natural fuel at the border of the Russian Federation. “Such a decision of the AMCU cannot be considered in any other capacity, except for an attempt to put pressure on Gazprom,” the Russian holding said.

The report also states that "Gazprom intends to protect its rights and interests by all available legal means."
102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    26 January 2016 14: 04
    Their ears are from that donkey
    1. +25
      26 January 2016 14: 06
      Are they idiots or what? Want to block transit ahead of contract?
      1. +11
        26 January 2016 14: 07
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Are they idiots or what?



        Everyone is suing the monopolies, the "European power" is there

        This is the case when "I heard the ringing, but does not know where he is"



        1. +18
          26 January 2016 14: 34
          Gazprom in the transit market is a consumer of transit services. What is a "monopoly position"? Maybe they are accusing Naftogaz of this? Or do they have an alternative GTS?
          1. +11
            26 January 2016 15: 02
            Quote: armored optimist
            Gazprom in the transit market consumer transit services

            Let them provide an alternative pipeline, otherwise you know, a monopoly laughing
            1. +10
              26 January 2016 15: 11
              From the text of the article
              Ukrainian antitrust officials have ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier.

              Get fucked up! belay Ward No. 6! fool crying
              In Ukraine, the "anti-monopoly" are completely mad! laughing
              1. +7
                26 January 2016 15: 20
                Quote: Tatiana
                From the text of the article
                Ukrainian antitrust officials have ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier.

                Get fucked up! belay Ward No. 6! fool crying
                In Ukraine, the "anti-monopoly" are completely mad! laughing



                The whole country is crazy there, the impression is that of their own importance, the mind has completely abandoned them.
                1. +2
                  26 January 2016 16: 22
                  Disconnect this ruin in Gazprom together with its transit pipelines ahead of schedule! let Europe itch!
                  1. +5
                    26 January 2016 19: 23
                    Quote: krot
                    Disconnect this ruin in Gazprom together with its transit pipelines ahead of schedule! let Europe itch!

                    Three days later, the gas will run out in the pipe, a week later, an off-site meeting of the heads of the EU countries will be held in Ukraine, and the next morning Porosenko will say that he was joking, nervously scratching his "lower back" ...

                    It would have been our "People's Property" a little less greedy, and the Government would have thought a little more about the interests of the country, and not about the majority shareholders of "Russia's Property" ... Merkelikha and Oland would have long danced not to the American tune, but a hopak at Porosenko's grave. ..
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +1
              26 January 2016 17: 57
              Quote: fennekRUS
              Quote: armored optimist
              Gazprom in the transit market consumer transit services

              Let them provide an alternative pipeline, otherwise you know, a monopoly laughing

              yeah - bypassing Ukraine ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. +4
            26 January 2016 15: 27
            As you remember, Ukraine recently adopted a law according to which the state sets tariffs for gas transportation. Naturally, the "fixed" tariff is more than 1,5 times higher than that specified in the Gazprom contract.
            Gazprom, of course, does not recognize the hike in tariffs retroactively, so the Antimonopoly Committee wants to force Gazprom "to provide services for the transit of natural gas via trunk pipelines through Ukraine from NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine on reasonable terms", i.e. agree to the tariff increase.
          5. +2
            26 January 2016 16: 31
            The Ukrainians, by the alternative of Ukro GTS, apparently mean Nord Stream (used by 30%) and apparently Nord Stream 2. Thus, basing on such a decision and submitting it to the European Commission, Gazprom can increase deliveries on the Nord Stream to 100%, while reducing transit through Ukraine. Bravo, gentlemen of dill. They inserted themselves.
        2. +15
          26 January 2016 15: 07
          That says it all.
          1. 0
            27 January 2016 01: 22
            Quote: sherman1506
            That says it all.

            the clinic will no longer help, only a lobotomy ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +18
        26 January 2016 14: 22
        Let them go around the market and choose another supplier. Weak?
        1. +4
          26 January 2016 14: 38
          Ukrainian antimonopolschiki ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier

          Ukraine offers Gazprom to act like Naftogaz - do gas reverse? Well, if Ukraine receives gas by reverse from Europe, then it is necessary to continue to drive it by reverse to Russia. And then back to Ukraine. laughing
        2. +3
          26 January 2016 14: 51
          Quote: bronik
          Let them go around the market and choose another supplier. Weak?



          So they ask for it. Let them be patient until the launch of Nord Stream 2, then they will receive it, through Germany, from anyone for a complete alternative. wassat
      4. +6
        26 January 2016 14: 53
        Shhh, here is a big minus! laughing
      5. +10
        26 January 2016 15: 09
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Are they idiots or what?

        "Morons, bl @ t!" (from)
      6. +3
        26 January 2016 15: 09
        Quote: oleg-gr
        Are they idiots or what?

        For the umpteenth time in recent years, I would like to quote our Foreign Minister ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +4
      26 January 2016 14: 06
      And from the same donkey eggs, lick!
    5. +22
      26 January 2016 14: 08
      Quote: Andrey_Antonov
      Their ears are from that donkey

      Nope, better to the audience .. uh .. the head of the male penis is on their collar. Since when will some muddy office represented by the AMCU “prescribe” something to Gazprom? Gazprom is not a resident of Ukraine and does not carry out business activities on its territory. So tell "Naftogaz" - let them look for fools themselves.
      The inadequacy of Ukraine as a transit country is another argument in favor of Nord Stream 2
    6. +25
      26 January 2016 14: 10
      and I impose a fine of $ 5 trillion on Ukraine for the fact that they have completely settled there in all structures and ask you to pay the specified amount in three months. bank details will be sent in the near future laughing
    7. +37
      26 January 2016 14: 10
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/971/fqyw457.png

      They try to do it soon! wassat
      And what side does the Antimonopoly Committee of UKRAINE relate to a Russian company?
      Since the Ukrainian committee - so let Ukrainian companies "anti-monopolize"!
      1. +18
        26 January 2016 14: 12
        But how can Gazprom not find an alternative supplier, then what? Prohibited to pump gas? Or will they start to face fines? The circus left, but the clowns remained. laughing
      2. +11
        26 January 2016 14: 14
        I hope it will be so after the "Nord Stream-2" is launched. And then their pipe will fit only in order to cut the burzhuikas out of it ... laughing
    8. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        26 January 2016 14: 39
        Idiocy Svidomo clearly progressing ... Yes
    9. +3
      26 January 2016 14: 40
      oh damn .... scream ... what is there in the country 404 sprayed in the air ... huh? THE PUPPIES OF THE UNIVERSE pancake
      1. +1
        26 January 2016 15: 21
        Quote: Air Force Captain
        what is there in the country 404 sprayed in the air ... huh?

        I think they have GTS siphon. Breathed to the cartoons
    10. +21
      26 January 2016 14: 55
      Yes flag in their hands
    11. +4
      26 January 2016 14: 55
      Ukraine, forever! The Show Must Go On !!! laughing
    12. +1
      26 January 2016 15: 17
      Do not like the conditions, piz ... those forest.
      You then the Jews, with de .... m devour.
  2. +6
    26 January 2016 14: 07
    A typical example of the freeloader mentality. Gazprom is obliged ... Well, what can you say? Is it only: hu not ho?
    1. +13
      26 January 2016 14: 11
      Freeloaders are freeloaders. They want GAZPROM to let Kazakh gas through its pipe for them, they say it is cheaper there. They don't want to build their own pipe through us. Why we owe no one in the world except Ukraine knows. fool
      1. +4
        26 January 2016 14: 33
        Ukraine knows everything. You cannot argue with her or be friends. The navel of the world, however.
    2. +8
      26 January 2016 14: 21
      At Gazprom, this decision was surprising.

      Everyone was tired of wondering for a long time, they were upset and laughing too, all that was left was to brush aside this squealing scum.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. avt
      +7
      26 January 2016 14: 09
      Quote: MainBeam
      Unskilled downs. Clowns.

      Well, since Krylov - "Ai Moska! Know she is strong, if she barks at an elephant."
  4. +13
    26 January 2016 14: 07
    Another weighty argument in favor of Nord Stream 2
    1. +2
      26 January 2016 14: 35
      Quote: Black
      Another weighty argument in favor of Nord Stream 2

      Not one but a thousand. Or maybe more. Rather, this tragicomedy would end.
  5. +12
    26 January 2016 14: 07
    "The Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU) said that Gazprom is obliged ..."

    Funny ones.


    It's time for Gazprom to form an alternative government of Ukraine, since the current
    "abuses its monopoly position in the market for generating idiocy and enchanting obscurantism."
  6. +8
    26 January 2016 14: 07
    "Obliged to PJSC Gazprom (Moscow, RF) within two months from the date of receipt of the decision to stop the violation by ensuring the receipt of services for the transit of natural gas through trunk pipelines through the territory of Ukraine from NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine on reasonable terms."

    Comrades, who know MOV, translate into Russian, please. I do not understand anything.
    1. +4
      26 January 2016 14: 29
      Yes, there is just everything ... "Give me a million, give me a million !!!"
    2. TTX
      +2
      26 January 2016 15: 00
      Perhaps Naftogaz of Ukraine wants PJSC Gazprom to undertake all the maintenance of the hot-wire by the territory, because all the equipment is in a deplorable state, so let them serve and Naftogaz will receive American hryvnia for transit (stop the violation by providing natural gas transit services through trunk pipelines in Ukraine) somehow wassat
    3. +2
      26 January 2016 15: 37
      As you remember, Ukraine recently adopted a law according to which the state sets tariffs for gas transportation. Naturally, the "fixed" tariff is more than 1,5 times higher than that specified in the Gazprom contract.
      Gazprom, of course, does not recognize the hike in tariffs retroactively, so the Antimonopoly Committee wants to force Gazprom "to provide services for the transit of natural gas through main pipelines through Ukraine from NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine on reasonable terms" agree to a "reasonable" tariff increase.
      1. +2
        26 January 2016 15: 48
        Thank. That is, as I understand it, there is nothing to do with a business (contract), just grandmas are needed ...
    4. The comment was deleted.
  7. +6
    26 January 2016 14: 08
    Ukrainian brain activity is in doubt.
    1. +8
      26 January 2016 14: 21
      In Ukrainians, the brain is not included in the basic package. recourse
      1. +2
        26 January 2016 16: 27
        Quote: Consul-t
        In Ukrainians, the brain is not included in the basic package. recourse

        AND HE IS NOT IN A LUXURY !!! generally such an option is not in trend with them
  8. +5
    26 January 2016 14: 08
    Eee, how is it? That is, Gazprom on the territory of 404 should independently seek a new transit country for gas supplies to Europe? What is our interest in this? Maybe this is the problem of the European Union?
    1. +2
      26 January 2016 14: 36
      Quote: Maksus
      Maybe this is the problem of the European Union?

      Yes, for sure, this is a problem of the European Union. And what else ?! Only the EU has not yet seen it (the problem). A new round of gas war threatens to stop transit. And in the heating season. The EU has not yet understood what city it is, but it has plunged into the country of 404.
      1. +2
        26 January 2016 14: 41
        My main question is, where do we sell EU gas - on our border or on the western Ukrainian? If on ours - then kakly come in the forest, if not - then we can be put forward for it.
        1. +3
          26 January 2016 15: 07
          On our border, Gazprom transfers gas
          "Naftogaz" for pumping through the territory
          Ukraine, on the border with EU countries receives
          back and transfers to the buyer, transit through
          Ruins are paid separately, according to the contract.
          1. 0
            26 January 2016 15: 31
            Then why pay attention to the cries of kaklov? All claims to the transit, which violates the contract.
          2. +1
            26 January 2016 15: 33
            Does Gazprom pay for pumping over to Naftagaz? Company-company? Then why does the Ukrainian government get involved in setting tariffs?
        2. +1
          26 January 2016 15: 48
          In the Western Ukrainian. So, formally, Gazprom is cunning that it does not conduct commercial activities in Ukraine, and they can solder a fine to it. True, the justification for this fine is really insanely, but this does not remove the problem from Gazprom.
          Imagine you are driving your car in some UKGANDA and a local traffic policeman stops you and writes out a decision on bringing to administrative responsibility in the amount of horseradish knows several million hryvnias for not sitting in your car. Moreover, the car is immediately seized against the payment of a fine. You then, of course, can appeal such a decision in court, but it will be the UkGANDA court and the same UkGANDons are sitting there as the traffic cop who wrote you a fine. And what should you do in this case, especially when you consider that the road is the only one and you simply can’t drive the other way.
  9. +8
    26 January 2016 14: 09
    Any war on our planet can be stopped, swords can be sheathed and dispersed to their homes. Anything except the war between Gazprom and Naftogaz. It seems to me that even if we lay an alternative main route through the Tibet-Indian Ocean mountains, bypassing Africa to Europe ", and Ukraine will completely switch to South African coal and Australian dung ... and then we will continue to be bombarded with claims laughing
    1. +1
      26 January 2016 14: 26
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      Australian dung ..... and then they will continue to bombard us with suits

      And what does Australia produce dung? And even on an industrial scale? Didn't know?
      1. +5
        26 January 2016 14: 49
        Australia --- a tough monopolist in the market of kangaroo dung. Local aborigines make huge fortunes on this. Unique product! fellow
  10. +6
    26 January 2016 14: 09
    Yeah, now we’ll bring along with our gas pipeline and our fields from the passwordless universe !!!
  11. +4
    26 January 2016 14: 14
    their ears are from a herring, even if they block supplies to the EU, they will be happy there laughing
  12. +13
    26 January 2016 14: 15
    I represent who they have in this "antimonopoly committee"fool
  13. +4
    26 January 2016 14: 19
    Marasmus. In fact, they oblige Gazprom to find an alternative supplier of gas to Krajina. Very sorry for the Ukrainians.
  14. +5
    26 January 2016 14: 19
    Well, from our "partners" you need to wait and not such freaks.
    1. why not make a complaint about ... and why a reason, come on without reason!
    2. Based on the foregoing, and why so little was requested, so demand a billion, or even two.
    3. Well, and thirdly, finally: yes, gentlemen, go, or rather, the lords of our Russian forest! current do not get lost ... laughing
  15. +4
    26 January 2016 14: 19
    Well, if you swing to the border with the Ukrainians, create a strict accounting, and your transit only return the money for the infrastructure. And there the gas came or his Ukrainians poked it ***, pay for the volume and that's it.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 23
    It can be seen guys knapsacks beguiled. fool
  19. +3
    26 January 2016 14: 24
    No question, "Gazprom" will offer them Ovsky LNG from the fields of Western "Ukraine".
  20. +4
    26 January 2016 14: 25
    In the ass you need to upload. No transit.
  21. +3
    26 January 2016 14: 26
    To the garden, everything to the garden.
  22. +4
    26 January 2016 14: 27
    Kiev decided to fine Gazprom at $ 3,47

    3,47-3 = 0,47bn. They cleverly decided to get out of debt! Yes, and they made the debtor :)))
    1. +1
      26 January 2016 16: 24
      Quote: Panaebis
      3,47-3 = 0,47bn. They cleverly decided to get out of debt! Yes, and they made the debtor :)))

      Only from this paradise will not come No. not a fig! laughing
  23. +4
    26 January 2016 14: 27
    Let them teach you how to cook your NAFTAGAZ cabbage soup! They don’t know which side to approach and bite us like, like a little Domestic dog. Probably the next order from the Amer.obkom (every day in the media about gas and dissatisfaction with dill)? For the last time, memories of Crimea have become more frequent. Probably the regional committee set the task: If you came to power without the Crimea, and profiled him, then do what you want and return, otherwise you will not see trenches like your ears. Hence such activity both in gas and in CRIMEA. FAS team! It works, but does not lead to any results on our part. Here Ukrainian slow-thinking and invent their claims, some are moronic than others.
  24. +5
    26 January 2016 14: 27
    There is nothing surprising in this!
    It remains to disconnect all of Ukraine from the gas pipe, let them receive reverse gas from Germany, and fine themselves for this. All this is reminiscent of the excuse of the mayor from Nikolai Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General", as a non-commissioned officer's widow whipped herself. hi
  25. +6
    26 January 2016 14: 31
    Iron logic helps rule the state .............
  26. +1
    26 January 2016 14: 33
    Here are cleverly made, because there is a contract in which everything is spelled out. So many years it was all right and now no. Ukraine can supply you with gas for free and pay extra for it. It’s exactly said hoho .. born, a Jew cried. hi
  27. +1
    26 January 2016 14: 41
    and what is the point with the court regarding the debt of Ukraine?
  28. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 41
    And I suddenly realized:
    The catch is worth the fear of passengers!
    Airplane and steam engine - has no alternative ...
    Deposit is everything!
    We get a transit penalty ...
  29. +1
    26 January 2016 14: 43
    The geytsi turned out to be trickier in choosing a place for gas metering meters. They knew in advance that the Urinians would take their side in the fight against Russia. Although these ruins and jumps showed the world their mean nature.
  30. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 46
    The less gas there is in the underground gas storage facility, the more blue thieves become more active. laughing
  31. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 48
    Let the antitrust police of Ukraine make an order to the government and cease to engage in any garbage with them, at least some benefit will be from them!
  32. +3
    26 January 2016 14: 48
    Here is a great alternative. The system of digestion and gas formation of gentlemen parashenko, egg and with them.
  33. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 53
    Find an alternative supplier? And who is it? Or is Biden’s son floating with his gas company? And transit ... And what about transit? The bulk of the fuel goes through the Nord Stream: the Germans frown, they support the sanctions, but they will buy one horseradish and are interested in increasing the amount of fuel. And the south of the EU will wait. To hell with gas, if the chemical industry is almost all concentrated in Germany, France and England ?! Italians will suffer, but Pshek is not sorry
  34. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 53
    It is necessary to give more discounts to animals, then they will become even more insolent. They do the will of an exceptional nation.
  35. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 54
    What can’t you do to once again draw world attention to your emaciated, shabby person, which, alas, is less and less ...
  36. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 57
    Ukrainian antimonopolschiki ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier
    .... here are clowns, not a day goes by without their next trick.
  37. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 57
    excellent, once again they will expose themselves to sheep in front of Europeans who use this gas.
  38. +2
    26 January 2016 14: 59
    fool * PRESCRIBED *. Now I’m going to die of laughter. The booger climbed onto a bear and thinks that it is cooler and taller than all. It is the land of madmen.
  39. +3
    26 January 2016 15: 00
    Petro runs to Angelica:
    - Hello, Angela, I came up with an ultra-fast way to get rich!
    - Well done, excellent, excellent ... Only - you already borrowed money from me! ... By the way, when will you give it back?
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. +3
    26 January 2016 15: 09
    I’m thinking, if the Khokhlyatsky obstinacy, cunning ... maidanutism and the desire to incinerate them from the inside by all means, at any cost to spoil a neighbor, even to the detriment of oneself, and send them to fight with the West. Poland would have lain under Krajina in 36 days, France for 43, Germany would have held out a little longer, but it would have been reformatted into two accounts by its Salafi refugees (ugh, slip of the tongue. SAILOADS).
    And the Ukrainians would have had Polish gardeners, German swineherds, French governesses. Ukraine-tse Europea!
  42. +1
    26 January 2016 15: 13
    There is such a toad. Swells and roars in bass. But amphibians can be understood. Fight for survival. And Ukraine - what is puffing up and trying to mumble bass? Really learns toad to speak? Ukrainians got their stupidity. Honestly already tired. Overlap the gas and do not even check dead, did not die, do not care.
  43. +2
    26 January 2016 15: 24
    As soon as Putin, given his capabilities, has the patience to talk with "our partners"?
    I admit, I would have ... flushed ...
  44. +2
    26 January 2016 15: 31
    "The message also indicates that" Gazprom intends to protect its rights and interests by all available legal means. "- Referring to Medvedev and recommending a reduction in gas prices, the problem will be temporarily resolved.
    1. +1
      26 January 2016 15: 49
      2009’s gas supply and transit contract probably doesn’t mention a ban on the construction and military security of another gas pipeline along the shortest direct route through the territory. We know how to build, we also know how to ensure safety, and let naf-naf gas wait when a fine is instilled from an old pipe ... laughing
  45. +2
    26 January 2016 15: 37
    I’ve already read this stupidity and I’m not going to understand how, but what should Gazprom do ?!
    selling gas in balloons through different suppliers?
  46. +2
    26 January 2016 15: 40
    Gazprom must put a bolt on all of this, ignore the mentally ill and continue to trade.
  47. +1
    26 January 2016 15: 42
    “We are talking about the abuse of monopoly position in the market for the transit of natural gas through pipelines through the territory of Ukraine”
    Let Gazprom announce its competitor for the transit of someone from our ZHEK (management company). And that’s all ... the country has neither money, nor gas, nor power, nor a roof over its head ... and even Europe will not find it.
  48. +1
    26 January 2016 15: 42
    What ????? Let's call the office "Svyaz-GAZ" and all the issues will be settled. It is not a fact that Gazprom sells gas to this office. So these are all "excuses of the prodigal son" .......
  49. +1
    26 January 2016 15: 45
    Oooo-oo-ky have built a legal novel. On the territory of Russia (to the point of delivery of gas), Russian legislation applies; only Gazprom has the right to export pipe gas; no one else from Russia can go into the pipe. Ukrainian legislation on Russian territory? laughing

    But the pipe is already half empty. So let u-kri themselves, or with the help of Biden-2, from their territory, fill their pipe. Who's stopping something?
  50. +1
    26 January 2016 15: 47
    Alaverdy is not much. No one said that "I will not command the parade." So Gazprom can count on me, we will somehow agree on the salary of the general ....... The joke is clear pepper, but it contains a hint to good fellows a lesson. Do not want to agree with Gazprom, well, read my post first.
  51. +1
    26 January 2016 16: 21
    Well, what can I advise them?! what Buy a sponge roller machine, smile it is expensive lol !!! Then let them at least sew a button on your forehead, cheap and cheerful wassat ! The rolled lip will be fastened lol !
  52. 0
    26 January 2016 16: 37
    And I was amused by the very name of the structure: ANTI-MONOPOLY Committee. Somehow it doesn’t fit with what’s happening among the fat eaters. It feels like the competition in their market is off the charts. wassat Oh, I forgot that EROP! Everyone: knock me down with a stick - I can’t land! laughing wassat
  53. 0
    26 January 2016 17: 40
    There is such a wonderful work “Kings and Cabbage”. Written more than a hundred years ago, but how accurately they described the country of 404! hi
  54. 0
    26 January 2016 18: 03
    Supplier of what, morons???
  55. hartlend
    0
    26 January 2016 18: 13
    They barked a little, but we have to work off the mess.
  56. 0
    26 January 2016 18: 18
    ordered Gazprom to find an alternative supplier
    They offer Gazprom to buy gas from Naftogaz in order to make Europe dependent on Ukraine, Naftogaz is Gazprom’s partner!
  57. 0
    26 January 2016 20: 06
    Quote: bulvas
    Everyone is suing the monopolies, the "European power" is there

    This is the case when "I heard the ringing, but does not know where he is"

    It's called: "Where the peasants go, so do the monkeys"!
  58. hartlend
    0
    26 January 2016 23: 09
    You are only to blame for what I want to eat.
    I.A. Krylov.
  59. 0
    27 January 2016 03: 25
    stop the violation by ensuring the receipt of transit services <...> from NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine on reasonable terms

    Look, made with a cunning finger and smeared with lard)) Can this be understood as the issuance of permission to “ensure the receipt of services” by Gazprom?)) Otherwise they will pay later when the support team arrives...