Military Review

At Zvezdochka, production of modern thrusters has been launched.

57
In JSC "Ship Repair Center" Zvezdochka "" (Severodvinsk) began the production of modern thrusters (PU) for ships, which are still ordered abroad, transfers TASS message of the press service of the enterprise.


At Zvezdochka, production of modern thrusters has been launched.


“As part of the implementation of the import substitution program, the company carried out design and manufacture of a thruster PU130 / 5,” said the head of the press service Nadezhda Shcherbinina. “The first thruster was shipped to the customer — the Nevsky Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Plant — to equip the medium sea tanker Akademik Pashin under construction at the Schlusselburg shipyard (23130 Ave.).”

According to her, “contracts for the supply of similar equipment for ships being built at the Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg and the Yaroslavsky Shipbuilding Plant are currently being executed.”

“The company is developing and mastering the production of thrusters and screw-steering columns (VRK) of mechanical type in the power range from 500 kW to 9 MW,” the press service noted. “By 2020, the ship repair center in Severodvinsk will be able to meet the needs of domestic shipbuilding in PU and VRK of mechanical type practically throughout the whole range - from tugboats to icebreakers”.

Shcherbinina noted that "in the territory of the Zvezdochka, a specialized workshop of the assembly and test complex of screw-steering columns (engine and screw capsules located under the bottom of ships) and thrusters was erected."

“We are currently working on the construction of the second stage of specialized production, the pile field has already been driven,” she added.
Photos used:
Ship repair center "Asterisk"
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Uran
    Uran 26 January 2016 13: 35
    +6
    that is great
    1. Sid.74
      Sid.74 26 January 2016 14: 27
      +8
      But still the shipyard “Star” in the Big Stone is now being rebuilt.
      "The shipyards will produce gas carriers, oil tankers, drilling ships and oil and gas production facilities for the needs of the Russian industry."

      The first customer is known now. Sovcomflot will build two ice-class supply vessels on the joint venture’s capacities. In the future, ships for the largest Russian companies will go off the stocks of the Bolshoi Kamen super dock.


      And one more news yesterday appeared that Russia will start building cruise liners for the first time in 60 years ... belay

      From this year, Russia will begin to build themselves cruise liners with a capacity of up to 300 passengers to work on inland rivers. For their acquisition in the future will have to motivate travel companies. These plans are reported in the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

      Funds to support shipowners, as explained by the Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov, will be allocated through operational leasing. It is beneficial for expensive projects. The ship at the end of the lease agreement with the shipbuilders does not become the property of the shipowner companies, but remains with the leasing company.
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 26 January 2016 15: 29
        +3
        We have had shipbuilding in the "paddock" since the times of the USSR. Large ships were built in the CMEA countries, Finland .. And the cruise liners ("Admiral Nakhimov" - the fond memory of the dead), were partially received from the Nazis on indemnity .. There is a field unplowed.
        1. Samaritan
          Samaritan 26 January 2016 16: 03
          0
          Quote: dmi.pris
          We have had shipbuilding in the "paddock" since the times of the USSR. Large ships were built in the CMEA countries, Finland .. And the cruise liners ("Admiral Nakhimov" - the fond memory of the dead), were partially received from the Nazis on indemnity .. There is a field unplowed.

          That is why they bought the Finnish company and negotiations are underway about others!
  2. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 26 January 2016 13: 36
    +4
    This is very good, because they can when they want.
    1. Inok10
      Inok10 26 January 2016 14: 09
      +4
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      This is very good, because they can when they want.

      .. they were earlier .. but only for the submarine pr. 667 .. 2 external screw columns RDK-35 with electric motors PG-102M (not fact) with a capacity of 140 hp. development of NPP "Marine Engineering" .. in the photo .. hi
      1. Engineer
        Engineer 26 January 2016 14: 46
        +3
        You really don't make the difference between the outboard speaker and the thruster?
        1. Maxom75
          Maxom75 26 January 2016 15: 01
          +3
          This is the outboard column, the thruster, as a rule, in the body of the hull (it is rigidly fixed in the tunnel, as a rule, it is located closer to the bow of the ship and has screws on both sides and was developed in the USSR, it is installed on almost all dry cargo ships of the late USSR Volgodon, Volgoneft "," Volzhsky "," Volgobalt "). It did not cause any difficulty in production, in practice I even repaired it. I have not met steering columns, I have met rotary nozzles. Mastering the production of rotary nozzles is possible news, but some kind of nonsense about the thruster.
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 26 January 2016 15: 38
            +3
            Quote: Maxom75
            It did not cause any difficulty in production; in practice, I even repaired it. I did not meet steering rotary columns, met rotary nozzles.

            .. absolutely right .. hi and more:
            In 2012 was The head branch of NPO Vint OJSC of TsS Zvyozdochka OJSC signed a contract with Zelenodolsk plant them. A.M. Gorky for the supply of adjustable pitch screws, special thrusters and control systems for the propulsion system on the 1st rank border patrol ship of project 22100 Ocean developed by TsMKB Almaz. The control system, specially developed for this ship, provides integrated control of the propulsion system, the main engine, gearbox and electric drive of the patrol course.
            With 2005 2012 for years. on the border patrol ships of the coastal zone of Project 1496M Walrus, NPO Vint delivered 10 adjustable-pitch propellers VR1496M. These VRS installed on the ship in rotary nozzleare designed to be used as the main mover. They provide the necessary modes of movement of the vessel, including reversal and the regime of "zero thrust", in which the vessel remains stationary without stopping the engine. In 2013, two more similar VRS will be delivered to ships under construction.
            Delivery to ships and vessels under construction is also ongoing. thrusters. NPO "Vint" mass-produces thrusters with power from 22 to 300 kW. In 2012, tests were completed for the full power of the PU200F bow thruster with a power of 1100 kW and a propeller diameter of 2 m. Currently, working design documentation is being developed for PUs with a power of 500 and 750 kW.
            .. pictured rotary nozzle with VRSH VR1496M .. hi
            1. Inok10
              Inok10 26 January 2016 15: 41
              +3
              Quote: Inok10
              .. absolutely true .. and also:

              .. and, here is the PU200F thruster with a power of 1100 kW. screw diameter 2 m ... hi
          2. Karayakupovo
            Karayakupovo 26 January 2016 15: 56
            +1
            I met rotary (360 g) speakers (2 pieces at once and retracted into the case) on a military watchdog built in the 50s. And such thrusters are still on the Volgoneft pr.558 and 1577 (he worked as a captain). Construction of the tanker Krasnoarmeisk and Ruse (Bulgaria).
    2. seti
      seti 26 January 2016 14: 15
      +6
      This is the answer to those who shout from all angles that we do not have import substitution. Something may still not be what it is not possible to do so far, but tea hands are not from the ass.
    3. Karayakupovo
      Karayakupovo 26 January 2016 15: 59
      0
      Basically they will walk along the line Moscow-S. Petersburg. Well, at the end of navigation in Sevastopol. It's still cabotage, not ocean-going ships.
  3. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 26 January 2016 13: 38
    +1
    Well, that's something "to build Airbus helicopters." And so our Sikorsky provided helicopters with helicopters for half a century!
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 26 January 2016 13: 53
      +1
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      Well, that's something "to build Airbus helicopters." And so our Sikorsky provided helicopters with helicopters for half a century!

      Stupid, in content, comment.
      Igor Ivanovich Sikorsky is a Russian and American aircraft designer.
      The four-engine Russian Vityaz aircraft (1913), the heavy four-engine bomber and the Ilya Muromets passenger aircraft, he created in Russia.
      He emigrated to the United States in March 1919, settled in the New York area, earning money for the first time by teaching mathematics. In 1923, he founded the aviation company Sikorsky Aero Engineering Corporation, where he became president.
      And he built helicopters as an American aircraft designer.
      So here the statement "our" is, to put it mildly, inappropriate.
      You would have said the same about Vlasov, Shkuro, Semenov ...
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 26 January 2016 14: 02
        +6
        Quote: oborzevatel
        You would have said the same about Vlasov, Shkuro, Semenov ...

        Sikorsky never called for the armed overthrow of the Soviets, did not fight against the USSR. Do not confuse the pedals. The same Denikin refused the Germans' offer to participate in the war against the USSR, but Shkuro and Krasnov for some reason agreed ...
        1. oborzevatel
          oborzevatel 26 January 2016 14: 35
          0
          Quote: inkass_98
          Quote: oborzevatel
          You would have said the same about Vlasov, Shkuro, Semenov ...

          Sikorsky never called for the armed overthrow of the Soviets, did not fight against the USSR. Do not confuse the pedals. The same Denikin refused the Germans' offer to participate in the war against the USSR, but Shkuro and Krasnov for some reason agreed ...


          Want the facts?
          Well then keep:
          In exile, Sikorsky ... took part in the activities of the monarchist movement. Sikorsky in the 1920s - 1930s was a member of the Sovereign Conference, organized by Kirill Vladimirovich, and also Russian National Union in Americaclose to the "headquarters captain movement" Ivan Solonevich.

          On May 18, 1938, the National Russian Front (NRF) was created, designed to unite right-wing emigrant organizations. Solonevich ideologically supported the creation of the front, which included the Russian fascist union, the Russian national union of war veterans, the Russian national and social movement, circles of “friends of the Voice of Russia”, Russian National Union in America.

          Despite the fact that the German leadership has left hopes for cooperation with Solonevich, his works continued to be used as anti-Soviet propaganda, publications of “Russia in a concentration camp” and “Pamir” were distributed in the occupied territory, fragments of articles were published in German newspapers

          Minus further.
        2. ARES623
          ARES623 26 January 2016 14: 41
          +1
          Quote: inkass_98
          Sikorsky never called for the armed overthrow of the Soviets, did not fight against the USSR. Do not confuse the pedals. The same Denikin refused the Germans' offer to participate in the war against the USSR, but Shkuro and Krasnov for some reason agreed ...

          All of them are, to one degree or another, enemies of the Russian state. Some fought one war, others two, still others armed the enemy armies with new weapons, while they knew who and against whom. All the traitors of Russia, and Sikorsky, including in the same line with Shkuro and Vlasov.
          1. Maksus
            Maksus 26 January 2016 21: 34
            -1
            Do you really think so? Let me ask you what brand of TV? And a computer with a phone? If it’s foreign, then you, based on your own logic, are a traitor, because you economically support the adversary.
            1. ARES623
              ARES623 27 January 2016 15: 07
              +1
              Quote: Maksus
              Do you really think so? Let me ask you what brand of TV? And a computer with a phone? If it’s foreign, then you, based on your own logic, are a traitor, because you economically support the adversary.

              You are clearly not a lawyer, there, as a rule, logic is studied as a subject.
              In essence: a US citizen, before becoming one, undergoes a naturalization procedure, while he renounces obligations in relation to other states and expresses his readiness to defend the United States with arms in hand. Considering that the USSR-Russia has always been, is and will be for all time a probable enemy of the United States, then a native of Russia who took an oath of allegiance to a hostile state, how can you call it in one word? Offer options? Or yourself ...? And I do not see anything wrong with using an enemy trophy. Peter the Great became Great because he knew how to learn from the enemy and then beat the "teacher" with his own science.
              I think so.....
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 26 January 2016 14: 05
        0
        Quote: oborzevatel
        post of president. And he built helicopters as an American aircraft designer.
        So here the statement "our" is, to put it mildly, inappropriate.
        You would have said the same about Vlasov, Shkuro, Semenov ...
        Reply Quote Report Abuse
        bi | emoimgyoutubecolor | quotetranslit

        demagogy ... history in a different direction ...
      3. Maksus
        Maksus 26 January 2016 14: 11
        +1
        Wow, you waved, for which the engineer is on a par with the traitors?
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 26 January 2016 14: 20
          0
          Quote: Maksus
          Wow, you waved, for which the engineer is on a par with the traitors?




          Many of our people still have porridge in their heads.

          They do not understand that from the Bolsheviks thousands and thousands of very worthy and talented people fled wherever they looked — to all sides of the world.

          Who did not run away - destroyed.

          How much a different alignment (most likely, in our favor) could be in the world, if not for the Bolshevik-Leninists


          1. oborzevatel
            oborzevatel 26 January 2016 14: 54
            +2
            Quote: bulvas
            Who did not run away - destroyed.

            What is so categorical?
            Who wanted to stay, he stayed and worked. Worked, no matter what.
            Give you examples? So Google to help, I do not want to clog a branch and spend time.
            I advise you to watch a good film, "The Poem of Wings" is called. There is just about Sikorsky, and about those who remained to work in the USSR.
            1. Maksus
              Maksus 26 January 2016 15: 07
              -2
              Yes, good, not all people change their principles and oath. Or are you one of those who do this easily?
              1. oborzevatel
                oborzevatel 26 January 2016 15: 37
                +2
                Quote: Maksus
                Yes, good, not all people change their principles and oath. Or are you one of those who do this easily?

                I, as a military oath in 1990 (even under the USSR, if you do not know) accepted, I didn’t accept another. In 1991, the USSR rested in the Bose. And in protest against the collapse of my country, I did not leave the army and did not go abroad.
                I took the oath of war of the USSR, which says:
                "to be loyal to your People, your Soviet Motherland and the Soviet Government."
                And until recently, he served in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with all the ensuing consequences.

                From your question it follows that I did something wrong?
                Or should it have been different?
                1. Maksus
                  Maksus 26 January 2016 15: 40
                  -1
                  And people gave the Oath of the Russian Empire and the Emperor, what did they do wrong? And about the fact that you still served in the USSR - of course, you don’t know, we are not familiar)))
                  1. oborzevatel
                    oborzevatel 26 January 2016 15: 46
                    0
                    Quote: Maksus
                    And people gave the Oath of the Russian Empire and the Emperor, what did they do wrong?

                    Keep this for you for your overall development:

                    In 1918, the former tsarist military experts who went to serve in the Red Army did not require a mandatory oath, beginning with the words "I, the son of the working people ...".

                    The Soviet government respected their officer honor, since in the traditions of the Russian army the oath was taken once in a lifetime.
                    Oath for a real man, sorry for the analogy of how to lose innocence ...
                    He who swore twice will swear three times and four - as much as necessary ...
                    I found the text of the tsar’s oath and was surprised to find that the soldiers of the Russian Empire swore allegiance personally and exclusively to the tsar, and not to the Fatherland.
                    However, the former "gold miners" were not required to "re-swear."
                    Apparently, they decided that until 1917 the tsar was the embodiment of the Fatherland.
                    1. Maksus
                      Maksus 26 January 2016 18: 44
                      -2
                      And this is not enough for you? That people defended their ideals and did not want to go to the service of those who destroyed the country? If I were an officer in the imperial army, I would have spat on both the white and the red, I would just have left. For they taught me to kill enemies, not my compatriots. And yes, develop health!
                      1. oborzevatel
                        oborzevatel 26 January 2016 19: 33
                        0
                        Quote: Maksus
                        If I were an officer in the imperial army, I would have spat on both the white and the red, I would just have left. For they taught me to kill enemies, not my compatriots.

                        The position is "moyahataskrayu", is it a gallery?
                        And what, besides internal disagreements, there were no external enemies in those days?
                        Did you study the history of the USSR in school well? Or studied already in the newfangled Russian?
                        Have you heard anything about the Germans, Japanese, intervention?
                        Have you read Pikul's "Moonzund", have you seen the film of the same name?
                        You and in the current situation do not care about everything and everyone?
                        So spit on, the suitcase - the station - the overseas, why wait until they start shooting?
                        I pity you!
                      2. Maksus
                        Maksus 26 January 2016 19: 37
                        -2
                        The young man, Moonzund - this is the first world war, it ended in 1918. Pity yourself better, defender. Why not in the Donbas? Take a trip, apply skills. Show how to love your homeland)
                      3. oborzevatel
                        oborzevatel 26 January 2016 21: 34
                        0
                        I didn’t want to get personal ...
                        Young man, I have already given my debt to the Motherland, unlike you. It is not for you to teach me how to love the Motherland. Donbass certainly does not concern you, there is a civil war going on, you should not worry about it, because "vashahataskraiu". Sit and ostrich yourself in a small way ...
                        I look, and they picked up a suitable emblem for themselves, like you can’t shoot in the red cross?
                        Or will you be from the political educators, they have a similar emblem, only a larger glass, but the snake’s tongue is longer ...
                      4. Maksus
                        Maksus 27 January 2016 13: 57
                        -2
                        My dear stranger, I gave the homeland - 9 years. And if you say something bad for the Red Cross and the emblem of the medical service, then it’s better to bypass the hospital in St. Petersburg, do not let Gd fight. Maybe I'll mix it up and cut something extra))))
                      5. oborzevatel
                        oborzevatel 27 January 2016 19: 03
                        -1
                        Quote: Maksus
                        My dear stranger, I gave the homeland - 9 years. And if you say something bad for the Red Cross and the emblem of the medical service, then it’s better to bypass the hospital in St. Petersburg, do not let Gd fight. Maybe I'll mix it up and cut something extra))))

                        Ok wait.
                        You will recognize me by the Budenovka and the Red Army overcoat with "conversations".
                        Password:
                        "Do you have a Slavic wardrobe for sale?"
                        Feedback;
                        "The wardrobe is already sold, I can offer a nickel-plated bed with a bedside table." (C) lol
                      6. Maksus
                        Maksus 27 January 2016 21: 26
                        -2
                        Joke, joke! Do you know how many such merry fellow passers in front of me every day?
                      7. oborzevatel
                        oborzevatel 27 January 2016 22: 15
                        0
                        Quote: Maksus
                        Joke, joke! Do you know how many such merry fellow passers in front of me every day?

                        The most important thing is that they pass, not carry away ...
                        "This is not a joke yet, dad. The joke will come later ...
                        12 chairs (C)
                      8. Maksus
                        Maksus 28 January 2016 07: 46
                        -1
                        Someone is taken away, not everyone has enough health. Unfortunately.
                      9. oborzevatel
                        oborzevatel 28 January 2016 08: 39
                        0
                        Quote: Maksus
                        Someone is taken away, not everyone has enough health. Unfortunately.

                        Well, there’s a double-edged sword ...
                        Either the health is not enough ... or someone has not finished it ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • bulvas
    bulvas 26 January 2016 17: 27
    0
    Quote: oborzevatel
    Quote: bulvas
    Who did not run away - destroyed.

    What is so categorical?
    Who wanted to stay, he stayed and worked. Worked, no matter what.
    Give you examples? So google to help ....



    No matter what - it is possible if the enemy attacks.

    And if they beat their own? First, just like that, like "bourgeois!", Then simply because someone calls:
    - "more gasstgels, more gasstgels!"

    And Google is not a Gulag, it won’t help
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 26 January 2016 19: 25
      0
      That is, and Tupalev had to be draped, like Sikorsky? And Zhukovsky, and Sukhoi, and Yuryev, and Arkhangelsk, and Stechkin (is it a designer of aircraft engines)?
      And, like Sikorsky,
      half a century of Americans (French, British) provide helicopters (aircraft, aircraft engines)?
      And let his native country be bent ...
      Well, my friend, you’re saying, don’t talk ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. bulvas
        bulvas 26 January 2016 20: 28
        +1
        Quote: oborzevatel
        That is, and Tupalev had to be draped, like Sikorsky? And Zhukovsky, and Sukhoi, and Yuryev, and Arkhangelsk, and Stechkin (is it a designer of aircraft engines)? And, like Sikorsky,


        Demagogy, you immediately feel the Bolshevik sourdough - to blame from a sick head to a healthy one.

        It's not about the fact that it was necessary to flee, but about the fact that it was not necessary to arrange a mess in the country, then they would not have run

        It is not Sikorsky's fault that he left Russia, but those who made life impossible in Russia, that is, the Bolsheviks

        Now even children in the kindergarten know that revolutions are not the work of external well-wishers and that revolutions cannot improve people's lives

        1. oborzevatel
          oborzevatel 26 January 2016 21: 39
          0
          Quote: bulvas
          revolutions do not improve people's lives

          Well, share the recipe on how to improve people's lives? ..
          And then in the Federation Council, State Duma, and in the government, a crowd of people is sitting, trying to improve everything, but something is not working ...
          Since you are so smart, why then "make a sofa" and "keyboard", you are our homebrew expert ...
  • ARES623
    ARES623 27 January 2016 14: 53
    +1
    Quote: bulvas
    Many of our people still have porridge in their heads.

    They do not understand that from the Bolsheviks thousands and thousands of very worthy and talented people fled wherever they looked — to all sides of the world.

    Who did not run away - destroyed.

    How much a different alignment (most likely, in our favor) could be in the world, if not for the Bolshevik-Leninists

    Porridge, this is not bad, worse when manure.
    Maybe in the 17th, that part of the population fled, which considered itself the salt of the Russian land, but it had just created while it was in Russia? No motors, no artillery, no tractors, no machine tools. All Bolsheviks started from scratch, with overseas models. However, by the 40s, the children of farm laborers and peasants had created independent technical schools in almost the entire industrial spectrum. And now, people with a "nekasha" in their heads, ask yourself a question, would Grabin, for example, become a "genius of Russian artillery" under Nicholas 2? And Kalashnikov? And Shavyrin? And Koshkin? Many can be remembered. And there are even more of those who were completely forgotten, but who became the engineering core of the industrial power of the USSR in the 20s and 40s, thanks to which we are now printing in Russian letters. And whoever does not like the Bolsheviks of those years - hang yourself, you will not change anything.
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 27 January 2016 18: 28
      0
      Quote: ARES623
      ... And to whom the Bolsheviks of those years do not like - choke on, you can not change anything ...


      The Bolsheviks have long been gone, immediately after Stalin they began to withdraw.


      The conclusion from your speech is deplorable:
      - There can be nothing good in Russia without a powerful shake-up.
      - there would be no Bolsheviks - there would be no industrialization

      Then regard the 90s in Russia as another shake-up, 15 years of devastation, God forbid, now the revival will begin

    2. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Sharky
    Sharky 26 January 2016 13: 38
    +5
    But this is really good news. Import substitution is slowly starting to gain momentum. It is important that such units have a wide range. Still, the propeller columns have a future (precisely in the context of how propulsors), especially if you need to hold the position in one place (laying a pipeline or cable on the bottom surface). The maneuverability of the vessel increases significantly, the rudder balloon dies off as an unnecessary unit. There is a drawback: service is only in the dry dock ... But, the use of propeller-driven columns is a trend, more and more ships are equipped with them.
  • Приговор
    Приговор 26 January 2016 13: 39
    +4
    Go Russia!
  • 24rus
    24rus 26 January 2016 13: 58
    +2
    From a distance, it looks like "our answer to Chamberlain!"
  • Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 26 January 2016 14: 04
    +4
    So our officials need a rooster constantly pecking them in one place. And in general, it is necessary to organize the work of officials so that they receive their salary from what is done in their territories. There is no salary, but different bonuses and bonuses, which are sometimes significantly higher than their salary. It would have long since gotten off the oil needle if the government sent all the preferences to other sectors and provided benefits to those who set up the release of goods with high added value, goods for export.
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 26 January 2016 16: 06
      0
      Well, where do the officials ??? And with all due respect, where have you been for the last 10 years ??? Or do you think the army and shipbuilding in particular itself rebuilt over the year ??? In short, tie a blizzard to drive!
  • Kolyan 2
    Kolyan 2 26 January 2016 14: 05
    +3
    Quote: Primus Pilus
    This is very good, because they can when they want.


    I agree with you completely, only sadness takes that we begin to itch when the cock already pecks request
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 26 January 2016 15: 47
      0
      Guys, well chesslovo is insulting! If only they were waiting for a rooster, then they would have lived in the 90s! Over the past 15 years, everything has changed, there have simply been priorities: medicine, housing, etc. Well, you can’t do everything at the same time! And all shipyards are being updated for 10 years!
  • Papapg
    Papapg 26 January 2016 14: 08
    +1
    Another channel of kickbacks was blocked, I think that only because of the possibility to hide kickbacks, a lot of products are purchased abroad. In Russia, science-intensive enterprises are being closed, there are specialists and designers and production facilities, and bureaucrats prefer to work with abroad. The slogan "Abroad will help us" does not work. Maybe she helped you, the officials, who were on contracts, but the country did not.
    1. Vovanya
      Vovanya 26 January 2016 15: 28
      0
      Regarding kickbacks:
      The Federal Agency for Industry (Rosprom) in 2008 announced a tender with a total contract price of 100 million rubles and with the same attraction of extra-budgetary funds: Lot No. 2 - R&D "Scientific support for the development of promising highly efficient competitive components of transport systems, taking into account the satisfaction of sanitary standards for noise and vibrations generated by propellers of ships operating in extreme ice conditions in the Russian Arctic. " Comfort-Silence code. Lot # 3 - R&D "Study of the possibility of improving the energy parameters of submersible electric motors, combined with a propeller unit, intended for use on underwater vehicles used at offshore oil and gas production facilities with the development of a structural design." Code "Rotor-Screw". Lot No. 4 - R&D "Research on the selection of optimal design diagrams of propulsion and steering columns for tugboats of increased maneuverability and vessels for servicing offshore oil and gas production facilities with the development of a structural design." Application No. 11-2-N4.7-0002 Page 9. Code "Propulsion ". Terms of work on lots No. 1 - 4 must be completed by November 30, 2010, and October 5, 2010. in Severodvinsk, the management of Zvezdochka Ship Repair Center OJSC signed an agreement with Flowserve Corporation (USA) on the acquisition of a license for the production of propeller-driven propellers (VRK) and thrusters (PU) on the basis of Zvyozdochka TsS OJSC with the transfer of the main technologies from the company "Flowserve Corporation".
      Such innovations ...
  • PKK
    PKK 26 January 2016 14: 22
    -3
    Putin pleases us daily with his far-sighted correct policy!
  • Taygerus
    Taygerus 26 January 2016 14: 27
    0
    The news is excellent, our response is liberal and to all whooper economists there, especially since these units are in demand and will be needed in the future
  • Zomanus
    Zomanus 26 January 2016 14: 50
    +1
    Good news.
    Still to prepare personnel for the future labor feats
    in the field of import substitution and import transcendence.
    That in the future we would buy such things.
  • VP
    VP 26 January 2016 14: 55
    +1
    Quote: bulvas
    How much a different alignment (most likely, in our favor) could be in the world, if not for the Bolshevik-Leninists

    I doubt it. The revolution did not happen at all from scratch. Everything was too much running. And the possibilities to somehow steer everything were ineptly missed earlier.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • hartlend
    hartlend 26 January 2016 18: 18
    0
    Thanks to the Americans.