Recall how he inhibited. It all started with the January offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbas in 2015, according to the officially given order of Commander-in-Chief Poroshenko. This offensive was stopped by the BCH, tightened with a Debaltz boiler and sealed by Minsk-2.
Why Moscow went to the signing of the Minsk agreements? Recall that the initiators of the Minsk meeting were made by French President Hollande and German Chancellor Merkel, who, after last year’s Munich Conference, urgently flew to Moscow to Vladimir Putin, spitting on Atlantic unity, since the Russian president was brilliantly absent in Munich. Senator McCain was very indignant at their voyage.
President Hollande blurted out to journalists then that the "big European war" was at stake, so he and Merkel undertook an urgent flight to Moscow to Putin. Night, I remember, the negotiations of the Moscow triumvirate were successful, agreed on the conditions of "Minsk-2", the political part of which was a victory for Moscow, and a trap for Kiev.
Since the implementation of the Minsk agreements leads to the political capitulation of the Bandera regime, precisely as a neo-fascist one. Why Poroshenko signed "Minsk-2"? They argue a lot about this ... in our opinion, Poroshenko, on the telephone advice of Biden’s friend, counted on ending the “Minsk-2” summer offensive in the Donbas, but it failed ...
Moscow went to the signing of "Minsk-2", because the alternative was to continue the war, spread it over the whole territory of Ukraine, with the possibility of growing into a "big European war." As a result of the Minsk agreements, some truce was established in the Donbass, and the implementation of Minsk-2 should have led to denazification and debandering of Kiev by peaceful means, under pressure from Russia, France and Germany, as a bonus, Russia agreed with the territorial integrity of mainland Ukraine. This seems to be the significance of the Minsk agreements for Russia.
A year later, before the new Munich conference, we see that Hollande and Merkel, continuing to swear "Minsk-2", are being removed from the Minsk process, instead of them the deputy for the negotiator on its implementation arrived in Kaliningrad. US Secretary of State Victoria Nuland ...
Moscow has fewer hopes to stop the Bandera-fascist component of the Kiev regime with the help of the Minsk agreements. In fact, Hollande and Merkel betrayed the letter and spirit of the Moscow agreement with Putin, “do not exert pressure on Kiev,” in a diplomatic language of Sergey Lavrov. To Victoria Nuland who appeared instead of them, Moscow, in annoyance, sends a political consultant, presidential aide Vladislav Surkov, this is still a diplomatic slap in the face and the State Department, and especially Kiev. They clarified their positions in the brainstorming, but no results were achieved, so there is no point for Putin to go to Munich! However, it is very interesting what Prime Minister Medvedev will say in Munich. Most likely, it will be a tough speech ...
The case goes to the disruption of the Minsk agreements, but it is important how they will be disrupted, that is, by military means, with the new offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbas, about which a number of analysts speak, or by a political crisis. In any case, there is nothing left for Russia to do but declare Kiev as no longer legitimacy, on the basis of non-compliance with the Minsk agreements. And the suppression of the population by the neo-Nazi Bandera militarized battalions, the plantings in the country of the neo-Nazi Bandera ideology. The West is constantly denying legitimacy to regimes it dislikes, so Moscow, in this case, will simply take advantage of Western political values.
Formal oaths of loyalty to “Minsk-2” by all his haters, even official Kiev, say that our Western colleagues understand the threat hanging over them, in the form of depriving Moscow of the remnants of the legitimacy of the Kiev regime. After that, all hopes for the federalization of the country turn to dust, and the Yugoslav scenario becomes on the agenda ...
In this sense, the head of the Ministry of Finance Yaresko in Davos is of interest as the future Prime Minister of the Kiev regime, after the resignation of Brother Rabbit, according to some observers. The basis for this was her political statements, first of all, the Crimean oath of allegiance. She swore by the Crimea that she was against “taking it away” from Ukraine.
The Crimea, in response to Poroshenko and Yaresko’s Davos statements, announced through the mouth of Prosecutor Poklonskaya a wanted list, on a charge of terrorism, of organizing a blockade of the Crimea by People’s Deputy VRU Dzhemilev and his Medzhlis company. These charges can be extended to the official Kiev, in aiding the terrorists-bombers of power lines.
On the other hand, all the rhetoric of Yaresko can be a bluff, and it is she who, as an American citizen and a direct protege of the Department of State, can dramatically change the political course in the prime minister’s office, in accordance with the latest instructions from US Vice President Joe Biden about the need to create the United States of Ukraine. This is consistent with the Minsk agreements, and removes the accusations of Russia of the West in the Minsk betrayal.
While Moscow is waiting, when Kiev is clearly tearing down the Minsk agreements, or will begin to implement them, shooting off the vanguard of its revolution. Then we will see the continuation of the revolutionary thriller “Dignity” live. This reality show, with an unknown result, in contrast to film trailers. Session start time: Fierce month.
The question remains: to whom did the annual Minsk truce benefit? It is answered in different ways. For example, Russia during this period was able to greatly impress the NATO generals with a demonstration of the RF AUF in Syria. This is an example of how Russia can cut the Kiev knot.
Yes, a lot will be decided in February, and therefore Putin is not going to Munich: the commander-in-chief at such a time should be among the troops, on a dashing KP.