Military Review

The “Basic Plan” of the USA as the Basic Law of the Russian Federation

77
You have a good plan, Comrade Brzezinski


Listening to patriots, reading articles about the Central Bank’s “uncontrollability,” that “the ruble is not our national currency” (essentially, not by name), I hear from almost every sensible person outrage words about the primacy of international law over Russian, I constantly ask imagine the same question! And it sounds like this: ONCE OF ALL, THE KNOWN ISSUES ABOUT THE PROBLEMS THAT ARE STATED IN A BASIC CLEARING LAW - OUR CONSTITUTION, WHY PEOPLE AND THE LEGISLATIVE POWER HAVE SELECTED (The Council and the Council of the Federation) DO NOT CHANGE THE ARTICLE LIMITING THE AUTHOR

The urgency of the question so absorbed me that I decided to look for an answer. Moreover, I was very strongly stimulated by the fact that the Constitution of the Russian Federation has already changed, and quite easily: due to changes in the names of the subjects of the federation and the processes of unification of the Russian regions, 9 ONCE (!!!) CHANGED THE ARTICLE 65 of the Constitution (on the composition of the subjects of the Russian Federation ).

And at the end of 2008, President D. A. Medvedev proposed amendments to the Constitution concerning the extension of the terms of office of the President of the Russian Federation from 4 to 6 years. During November-December 2008, these changes were accepted. And although these were the first significant amendments to the current Russian Constitution for its fifteen years with little history, took them pretty quickly. How did they increase the term of office of the president? Voila ...

Read carefully. SIMPLE PROCEDURE:
The project was reviewed and approved by TWO THIRDS OF VOTES OF DEPUTIES OF THE STATE DUMA AND THREE FOUR FOUR VOTES OF MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OF FEDERATION. After establishing the results of the review, the Council of the Federation for seven days sends the law of the Russian Federation on an amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation to the PRESIDENT, WHICH, FOR A FOUR DAYS, SIGNS AND PUBLISHES IT.

Simply? Simply! It turns out if the patriots are not the traitors in power, then any law aimed at improving our lives and getting out of Poluokupatsiya (this term, pronounced by President Putin, confirms the seriousness of the problem and indicates that the top people know about it) , take it easy and simple! But why is this not being done?

I will not intrigue you. Literally in a few sentences I will reveal this “secret”. Which cannot be called a secret, because, it turns out, the answer is in the MOST CONSTITUTION! It’s just that I (I don’t know how you are), to my shame, carelessly read our Basic Law, albeit a lawyer by education.

And in it it is written in black and white that ONLY ARTICLES FROM 3-ITS AND THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS can be changed by the “simplified version”, which I wrote about above.

Another thing is that according to the Constitution ARTICLE 1-CSOs and 2-CSO section in which and are the constitutional order, limiting the sovereignty of Russia, can be changed only if the PILE conditions after the appropriate decision by the Constitutional Assembly, which has not only not been formed, but and the Law on Convocation and the Order of Formation, which until now has not been adopted! (I apologize for the selection of the text, I just consider it necessary to focus on this.)

Do you understand? Neither the referendum (the will of the people) nor the desire of the legislators can bypass this, frankly, trap! Imagine the situation: there are NO RULES for which patterns to create this assembly, so that its education is recognized as legitimate and suits all interested groups? After all, everyone knows how these groups can exert pressure and block such initiatives. Drafts of such a law were submitted to the State Duma back in 1997, 1998, 2000 and 2007, but failed miserably (blocked by deputies).

Exclusivity Lectures

In 1995, at the lectures of a professor from the Altai State University, I had to hear his proud statement that he had participated in the drafting of our Constitution. According to him, we (Russia) should be proud of our Basic Law, as it “conforms to the most advanced principles of world constitutional legislation, because it takes into account the experience of all advanced countries, including the USA!”

If I knew what it would lead him and American advisers to before him, I would have thrown a shoe at him! But, unfortunately, half of the 18-year-old audience was sitting in sweatshirts with the words “USA”, “CHICAGO BULLS”, etc., and we treated the words “guru” from jurisprudence with respect. Those who grew up at that time remember how badly we thought that everything Soviet is bad, but the American is the most advanced and the best. Even the constitution "licked", what can we say about clothes, music, movies!

But in fairness it must be said that the thesis that the American Constitution has been written and executed for the sake of the American people and in their interests will also not be true! Most recently, I still began to divide the people and the national, as well as supranational (global) elites. The bottom line is that all international treaties, and the US Constitution, too, serve the masters of life (money). There, too, minor articles can be changed relatively easily, and the articles in chapters 1 and 2 of the Constitution, containing the foundations of the constitutional system, are only accessible to change by the Constitutional Assembly, which did not meet there God already knows how long, and for convening which also requires a lot of difficult conditions. In this regard, the Constitution of the Russian Federation is really tracing from the US Constitution.

One pleases. The most well-known of the changes to our Basic Law, the increase in the presidential term from 4's to 6 years, was made under pressure from the Americans. His goal is to prevent Putin from returning to the presidency, and to “put Medvedev there” for a longer period! Only now overseas strategists miscalculated, and Medvedev was not destined to go to the 2 term, as planned in the Washington Regional Committee (he voluntarily refused to participate in elections in favor of GDP), and now they will have to talk 12 for years with intractable "tyrant" Putin which of the last forces tries to minimize the flaws of the creators of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

Maybe Medvedev’s irremovability as chairman of the government is explained by the agreement of the tandem to “throw” globalists at that time? But this, as they say, is another story ...

What conclusions can and should be done

Push changes in the Constitution of the Russian Federation "swoop" will not work. With all due respect to the deputy Yevgeny Fedorov, who tried to do this, by making appropriate initiatives in the lower chamber. It is probably worth going the hard way, but the right way.

It is necessary by three fifth votes of the total number of members of the Council of Federation and the deputies of the State Duma to adopt a proposal to revise the provisions of the main chapters of the Constitution and convene a Constitutional Assembly in accordance with federal constitutional law.

According to part three of art. 135 The Constitutional Assembly either confirms the immutability of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, or is drafting a new Constitution of Russia.

Difficult, but doable! And just in this case, it is possible and necessary to study the practice of creating such assemblies by other countries — for example, the same United States.

Otherwise, you will have to put the question squarely before the legislators: whose interests do they really uphold?
Author:
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimyrych
    Vladimyrych 27 January 2016 12: 47
    +6
    Staricello Bzhe something lingered in this world. The devil has been putting absenteeism on him for a long time, and he has been fined for fuel that was just burned.
    1. Vend
      Vend 27 January 2016 12: 53
      +1
      To push through the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation “swoop” will not work.
      And what is the problem here? It’s good that it won’t work out right away. And so every liberalist will begin to redraw the Constitution.
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 27 January 2016 13: 01
        +2
        Quote: Wend
        And what is the problem here? It’s good that it won’t work out right away. And so every liberalist will begin to redraw the Constitution.

        ... I agree .. not an article, but another ".... on the fan" .. but for how much pathos and concern .. hi
        P.S. and as far as I remember in 2015, the Constitutional Court confirmed the supremacy of Russian legislation over international, and I also want to remind his decision on the execution of the decisions of the ECHR .. just tired "concerned" grief patriots with this gum .. about the Constitution and the Central Bank ..
        1. venedofruss
          venedofruss 27 January 2016 13: 39
          15
          The article is excellent. Written on the case and with the facts. Here on TV they say about the ONF, they give it to him what kind of country he is, it would be nice to invite the ONF to discuss the issue of the Constitutional Assembly
        2. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 13: 50
          13
          Quote: Inok10
          The Constitutional Court has confirmed the supremacy of Russian legislation over international, and I also want to recall his decision on the implementation of the decisions of the ECHR

          Dear, if you are a complete ignoramus in matters of law, then at least do not expose your denseness to the public. The article is correct and topical! It is high time to change the current Constitution, written under the dictation of American "advisers"
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 27 January 2016 15: 27
            +2
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            important if you are a complete layman in matters of law

            .. I’ll leave rudeness on your conscience .. and in essence a question .. I recommend to monitor changes in the legislation of the Russian Federation, and not throw slogans .. and so!
            MOSCOW, December 4. / TASS /. The State Duma adopted in the second and immediately in the third, final reading the bill allowing the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to recognize unfeasible decisions of international courts, primarily the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), if they contradict the Russian Constitution. The initiative was sponsored by representatives of all Duma factions led by Vladimir Pligin, chairman of the chamber’s profile committee on constitutional law and state building, as well as Senator Andrei Klishas.
            Amendments are made to the federal constitutional law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation pursuant to the July decision of the Constitutional Court itself. They stipulate that “at the request of the federal executive body vested with competence to protect the interests of the Russian Federation when considering complaints filed against the Russian Federation on the basis of an international treaty by the interstate body for the protection of human rights and freedoms, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation resolves the issue of the possibility of enforcing the decision of the interstate body to protect human rights and freedoms. " In particular, the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation are vested with competence for such appeals to the Constitutional Court, Pligin explained earlier.
            If the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation makes a decision on the impossibility of implementing the decision of the interstate body for the protection of human rights and freedoms in general, or in part, any actions (acts) aimed at the implementation of its relevant decision in Russia cannot be carried out )

            .. and further the decision of the COP from:
            The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation recognized the supremacy of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the execution of decisions of the ECHR
            Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 14.07.2015 N 21-P "In the case of checking the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 1 of the Federal Law" On the Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Protocols thereto ", paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 32 of the Federal Law" On International Treaties of the Russian Federation ", parts one and four of Article 11, paragraph 4 of part four of Article 392 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, parts 1 and 4 of article 13, paragraph 4 of part 3 of article 311 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, parts 1 and 4 of article 15, paragraph 4 of part 1 of article 350 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and paragraph 2 of part the fourth article 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of a group of deputies of the State Duma "
            http://www.consultant.ru/law/hotdocs/43697.html
            © ConsultantPlus, 1992-2016
            .. You still don't like the Constitution ?! .. study Dear! .. hi
            1. Ami du peuple
              Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 15: 48
              0
              Quote: Inok10
              You still don't like the Constitution ?! .. study Dear! ..

              No I do not like. I studied it as part of the academic discipline "Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation", while studying at the law faculty of Voronezh State University. Therefore, I dare say that I understand this issue a little better than you.
              1. Inok10
                Inok10 27 January 2016 18: 18
                +2
                Quote: Ami du peuple
                I studied it as part of the academic discipline "Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation", while studying at the law faculty of Voronezh State University. Therefore, I dare say that I understand this issue a little better than you.

                .. discussed, not your education and place of receipt .. Musical answer .. hi
        3. user
          user 27 January 2016 21: 05
          +1
          But, unfortunately, half of the 18-year-old audience was sitting in hoodies with the inscriptions “USA”, “CHICAGO BULLS”, etc., and we respected the words “guru” from jurisprudence.


          In those days, I was the head of the Computing Center (Computing Center), but I behaved no better. Our faith in ideals played a cruel joke with us, it took us a lot of time and all kinds of events to turn out like now. But now talking to us (I mean Europe or the USA, it doesn’t matter with the government or just citizens) is still a problem for our interlocutor. So, our former citizens from the EU or the USA come to us and I see and feel how hard they manage to understand us, not in the sense of language, but in the sense of actions or our conclusions. During this time, we have changed a lot and if I had not known them since childhood and had not studied or worked together for a long time, I would not have known what to say.
          And the article is interesting in the sense of discussion, but let everyone draw their own conclusions.
        4. yakpkufpkup
          yakpkufpkup 28 January 2016 00: 16
          +4
          One smart person said:
          "To find out who rules the country, find out who is being whispered about."
          Another no less intelligent person said:
          "To find out who really rules, find out who is forbidden to criticize."

          In general, there are many signs, one of them is, oddly enough, a banknote. On the Soviet banknote it was written:
          - "Ticket of the State Bank of the USSR".
          And this means that this monetary unit belongs to the State, and therefore to its citizens. Further we read:
          - "Bank notes are secured by gold, precious metals and other assets of the State Bank."
          That is, this is not just a painted piece of paper, but the equivalent of the country's Gross Domestic Product.

          We read the banknote of the Russian Federation:
          "Ticket of the Bank of Russia". - ALL!
          And this means that this banknote:
          1. NON-STATE, but some obscure bank, the devil knows where, and hell knows who belongs. One thing is for sure, this bill does not belong to the citizens of the Russian Federation.
          2. This bill is NOTHING and NOTHING TO BE PROVIDED BY ANYTHING. This means that it is worth it ... She is not worth a damn.

          We go further in the list:
          The Central Bank, a mysterious office, which due to the mystery and mysticism of its functions and inexplicability of illogical actions will give odds to any biblical myth. One small example:
          It is no secret that the current economic system is built on the basis of parasitism, deception, usury ... in a word - a financial dead-end fraudulent pyramid. Manufacturing enterprises located in this system are forced to "cooperate" with banks, agree to the deliberately enslaving and initially unprofitable spidery conditions of banks-usurers. And it is no secret for every man in the street that the higher the bonded interest, the more difficult it is for the borrower to survive and work. So, the situation:
          There is a crisis in the country, prices are rising (which is the very concept of inflation), enterprises are already suffering losses, and here Naibulina (the author, I mean, deliberately made a mistake) declares: "to reduce inflation, we raise interest rates." But logic dictates that if an enterprise increases its interest rate, then, in order not to go broke, it needs to increase the cost of its goods, and as we have already found out, an increase in prices is an increase in inflation. Like this? Create conditions for rising prices to lower them? Either someone is a fool, or skis do not go, or summer is outside. One of the two, either the head of the Central Bank is foolish, or she considers you and me fools, pushing obvious wild nonsense. Apparently the second. The forum screamers, operating with hackneyed methods of deception, slander, insults and other things, also believe. And when this does not help, the most persistent and inquisitive bans (which threatens me, I feel ... "I always feel" (c))) will soon be on this resource, as on some previous ones))).
      2. Oorfene Deuce
        Oorfene Deuce 27 January 2016 13: 37
        15
        Quote: Wend
        And so every liberalist will begin to redraw the Constitution.

        So it is written by the liberals ... The problem.
      3. yakpkufpkup
        yakpkufpkup 27 January 2016 15: 35
        -1
        The author casts a shadow on the wattle fence, so that those who doubt it can be carried along the wrong path, like Susanin the Poles.
        In general, this is a problem of today. Everyone scolds "ukrov" for their narrow-mindedness and unwillingness to see the obvious. Nevertheless, the situation is similar in Russia, although not in such a grotesque form that, in general, it does not change the essence. However, according to the subject. If the main law of the country was created by enemies and protects the interests of these very enemies, those who, without a liberation revolution, can replace it with a just one that protects the interests of the people, which they allegedly represent, do not change, then the conclusion suggests itself - they are also enemies. If everyone knows that education, social medicine, the military-industrial complex, agriculture, mechanical engineering are destroyed, and the corresponding bureaucrats are not only not punished, but are also awarded annually, then the conclusion is simple - the enemies of the people are in power. If the director of migration policy officially declares that "the country's indigenous population is dying out, decreasing by 2 million annually, but is being successfully replaced by migrants," and the person performing the functions of the president states that "the migration policy is being implemented ahead of schedule," then the conclusion is simple - enemies of the people have seized power in the country, in whose "schedules" the replacement of us with "migrants" has come. If it's not a secret for anyone that this "crisis" (artificially created, by the way) has led to the impoverishment of the people, but at the same time the number of billionaires in the country has increased, then the one who took over the authority to govern the country is responsible. Why, one wonders, do the "people's" court solder 3 years in a strict regime colony for stealing a chicken from hunger, and for the collapse of industries, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, the appropriation of the wealth of OUR subsoil, the untouchable caste receives medals, titles and other kosher buns? Their actors from the TV screen openly declare to us that "our Jewish ancestors have been here since the second century, and your Slavic ancestors have been here only since the sixth century, so don't be rude when visiting" (Solovyov), that "Russia is no longer a country of Russians" (Kandelaki), that "Russians were_dlots who need to be destroyed" (Sobchak), but no one punishes them for calling for genocide and interethnic strife, on the contrary, they are rewarded and receive all kinds of privileges. Why don't we take the example of the Jews who do not allow non-Jews to rule Israel?
        In general, the conclusion is simple, if someone took over the functions, but not only failed, but also caused damage to the state, that is, to you and me, then he certainly must be punished, regardless of his merits, status, nationality.
        Imagine such a hypothetical situation: Stalin cannot respond to Hitler's aggression, because it de contradicts the "constitution" that the Germans wrote for us. Who is he after that?

        I strongly suspect that "Yevgeny Leonov" is the pseudonym of some "Bronstein" who hides behind the name of the beloved People's Artist.
        1. 11 black
          11 black 27 January 2016 16: 37
          -2
          Quote: vyakpkufkup
          The author casts a shadow on the wattle fence, so that those who doubt it can be carried along the wrong path, like Susanin the Poles.
          In general, this is a problem of today. Everyone scolds "ukrov" for their narrow-mindedness and unwillingness to see the obvious. Nevertheless, the situation is similar in Russia, although not in such a grotesque form that, in general, it does not change the essence. However, according to the subject. If the main law of the country was created by enemies and protects the interests of these very enemies, those who, without a liberation revolution, can replace it with a just one that protects the interests of the people, which they allegedly represent, do not change, then the conclusion suggests itself - they are also enemies. If everyone knows that education, social medicine, the military-industrial complex, agriculture, mechanical engineering are destroyed, and the corresponding bureaucrats are not only not punished, but are also awarded annually, then the conclusion is simple - the enemies of the people are in power. If the director of migration policy officially declares that "the country's indigenous population is dying out, decreasing by 2 million annually, but is being successfully replaced by migrants," and the person performing the functions of the president states that "the migration policy is being implemented ahead of schedule," then the conclusion is simple - enemies of the people have seized power in the country, in whose "schedules" the replacement of us with "migrants" has come. If it's not a secret for anyone that this "crisis" (artificially created, by the way) has led to the impoverishment of the people, but at the same time the number of billionaires in the country has increased, then the one who took over the authority to govern the country is responsible. Why, one wonders, do the "people's" court solder 3 years in a strict regime colony for stealing a chicken from hunger, and for the collapse of industries, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, the appropriation of the wealth of OUR subsoil, the untouchable caste receives medals, titles and other kosher buns? Their actors from the TV screen openly declare to us that "our Jewish ancestors have been here since the second century, and your Slavic ancestors have been here only since the sixth century, so don't be rude when visiting" (Solovyov), that "Russia is no longer a country of Russians" (Kandelaki), that "Russians were_dlots who need to be destroyed" (Sobchak), but no one punishes them for calling for genocide and interethnic strife, on the contrary, they are rewarded and receive all kinds of privileges. Why don't we take the example of the Jews who do not allow non-Jews to rule Israel?
          In general, the conclusion is simple, if someone took over the functions, but not only failed, but also caused damage to the state, that is, to you and me, then he certainly must be punished, regardless of his merits, status, nationality.
          Imagine such a hypothetical situation: Stalin cannot respond to Hitler's aggression, because it de contradicts the "constitution" that the Germans wrote for us. Who is he after that?

          I strongly suspect that "Yevgeny Leonov" is the pseudonym of some "Bronstein" who hides behind the name of the beloved People's Artist.

          Nonsense designed for a patriotic urya, you can be sure about VVP and its immediate entourage, there are a number of reasons, I can describe them in detail and with explanations, actually I have already painted them, but "too long commentary", there is no desire to type all this again.
          But you are mistaken! Enemies really are in power, but not at the highest posts.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. yakpkufpkup
            yakpkufpkup 27 January 2016 19: 49
            +1
            And what can you paint? Privatization of absolutely all hydrocarbon deposits? Moreover, only officially all corporations (including state ones) belong to at least half of foreign private companies. And this, for a minute - STRATEGICALLY IMPORTANT OBJECTS! Including the largest financial institutions - Sberbank and VTB. Is it a TOP? And this is 2/3 of the country's territory - the main storehouse of the state's strategic resources, i.e. ours with you.
            1. These territories imply extraterritoriality, which means that these territories are subject to the jurisdiction of the country that "leases" them, and not the Russian one. Is it good?
            2. On this territory can be imported in excess of the migration quota, visa-free labor of the country that rob them, sorry "leases", and not the laws of the Russian Federation. Is it good?
            3. All these strangers have the right to serve in our army, to elect, to be elected. And this means that they will elect ONLY OWN, serve ONLY OWN, and defend ONLY OWN. And taking into account their legal inviolability, they will not be affected by force, since this will mean an attack on the country that is robbing this territory (China, for example), and this means a war with this country. Is that good?
            4. These enterprises have the right not to employ the indigenous population of our country, which means unemployment, lack of livelihoods and coercion to abandon these territories by the indigenous population. Is that good?
            5. These enterprises are oriented ONLY FOR EXPORT, and therefore will not go to the creation of our material values ​​with you. Is that good? By the way, the Trotskyists organized a famine in the 17-20s, when almost all food was exported from the country. It is unlikely that those who died of starvation considered this a blessing. Is it a blessing to export precious and rare-earth gifts of our nature? Is it a good exchange of strategic gas and oil resources in exchange for govnofantiki (which still go into the pocket of a bunch of kosher nouveau riche buddies of GDP) while in central Russia they drown firewood like the Middle Ages?
            6. Next. These enterprises do not pay taxes, customs duties, which means that even govnofantiki do not go to the budget of the Russian Federation. Is that good?
            7. For the entire period of "lease" (and this is a HUNDRED YEARS without a year), these enterprises own EVERYTHING ON THE EARTH and UNDER IT. And there are no looting quotas. For example, a project to build a pipeline from Lake Baikal to China is already ready for implementation. And if we consider that the level of the pearl of the earth, our wealth annually decreases by a rather impressive amount, certain doubts begin to torment. Is it a blessing or not?


            This is only a grain of the tip of the iceberg of works created by the untouchable caste. So is it good or not?
          3. yakpkufpkup
            yakpkufpkup 27 January 2016 20: 17
            0
            And what can you paint? Privatization of absolutely all hydrocarbon deposits? Moreover, only officially all corporations (including state ones) belong to at least half of foreign private companies. And this, for a minute - STRATEGICALLY IMPORTANT OBJECTS! Including the largest financial institutions - Sberbank and VTB. Is it a TOP? And this is 2/3 of the country's territory - the main storehouse of the state's strategic resources, i.e. ours with you.
            1. These territories imply extraterritoriality, which means that these territories are subject to the jurisdiction of the country that "leases" them, and not the Russian one. Is it good?
            2. This territory may be imported in excess of the migration quota, visa-free labor force of the country that robs them, sorry. Is that good?
            3. All these strangers have the right to serve in our army, to elect, to be elected. And this means that they will elect ONLY OWN, serve ONLY OWN, and defend ONLY OWN. And taking into account their legal inviolability, they will not be affected by force, since this will mean an attack on the country that is robbing this territory (China, for example), and this means a war with this country. Is that good?
            4. These enterprises have the right not to employ the indigenous population of our country, which means unemployment, lack of livelihoods and coercion to abandon these territories by the indigenous population. Is that good?
            5. These enterprises are oriented ONLY FOR EXPORT, and therefore will not go to the creation of our material values ​​with you. Is that good? By the way, the Trotskyists organized a famine in the 17-20s, when almost all food was exported from the country. It is unlikely that those who died of starvation considered this a blessing. Is it a blessing to export precious and rare-earth gifts of our nature? Is it a good exchange of strategic gas and oil resources in exchange for govnofantiki (which still go into the pocket of a bunch of kosher nouveau riche buddies of GDP) while in central Russia they drown firewood like the Middle Ages?
            6. Next. These enterprises do not pay taxes, customs duties, which means that even govnofantiki do not go to the budget of the Russian Federation. Is that good?
            7. For the entire period of "lease" (and this is a HUNDRED YEARS without a year), these enterprises own EVERYTHING ON THE EARTH and UNDER IT. And there are no looting quotas. For example, a project to build a pipeline from Lake Baikal to China is already ready for implementation. And if we consider that the level of the pearl of the earth, our wealth annually decreases by a rather impressive amount, certain doubts begin to torment. Is it a blessing or not?


            This is only a grain of the tip of the iceberg of works created by the untouchable caste. So is it good or not?
        2. Barnaul, Altai
          27 January 2016 21: 40
          0
          tongue

          @ leonov-evgeny
          Yes, go, at least in my instagram!
          I live in Barnaul, Name and Surname are real!
          I am a lawyer by training, but I have never worked as a lawyer! I am not a member of any parties, and I am not promoting any Fedorovs and Starikovs (I have questions for them) ...
          This article is a real desire to understand the problem! It is published in the "opinions" section. I am ready for constructive criticism, and not raids, as if I am hiding behind the name of the people's artist! Thanks to mom and dad for calling that!
    2. Finches
      Finches 27 January 2016 13: 06
      +4
      When this figure will play in the box - I personally drink about this indescribably !!!
      1. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 27 January 2016 14: 25
        +1
        All of Russia will drink to the joy that hell finally took away!
        To search for such a stinking ghoul ...
    3. 11 black
      11 black 27 January 2016 16: 17
      +1
      I agree with the author of the article that it is necessary to change the constitution. I also completely agree that this cannot be done in a snap.
      In addition, there are still factors that impede this matter, because adopting a law on creating a new constitution and even developing a draft is only the first step, then we need to ensure its adoption, and the vote should be transparent so that the nose mosquito does not undermine, as it is, show years through 80 the failure of the fundamental law and what shall we do? And here is the problem, mainly in the person of NGOs - foreign agents who, when trying to push through amendments to the constitution, will be extremely active, will try to sabotage the voting process and influence its results. Conclusion - first you need to eliminate the NPO. (this is already being done with a quiet pin - in theory, in the future, we should see the activation of this process)
      Further, it is necessary to be absolutely confident in the country's ability to defend its sovereignty in the process of changing the constitution, because without "cleaning the ranks" even the law on the creation of a constituent assembly will be difficult to pass, after the purge, all this will float into the streets and, with the full help of the YUSA, will spoil us life, besides the Americans for the sake of disrupting the change of const. 9 out of 10 will not be stingy to arrange an external conflict for us at the border, especially since there are both plant materials (dill) and a reason (Crimea)
      The Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Army must be ready to defend the country (it is clear from the Ministry of Internal Affairs - "Storm" cars are mandatory in all large cities, complete control of the Internet or the ability to turn it off is also required, it is necessary to have powerful media ready to resist the false stuffing of TC rain and others like it, and the army should be ready to defend the country from aggression similar to 2008, only counting on weeding the dill beds generously watered with the best Yusov fertilizers.In addition, so that any overseas adversary would not even dare to think about solving the matter by force, the Strategic Missile Forces should be 100% updated

      In short - this is a very difficult matter, there are many more factors that cannot be listed, but a change of consts. if it does, then not earlier than 2020, but for now we are following the situation, because some steps are already noticeable. hi
      1. Barnaul, Altai
        27 January 2016 21: 45
        0
        Yes, the information field on this issue is rather weak! probably 90% of people are not at all in the subject.
  2. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 12: 47
    +8
    In FIG Constitutional Assembly convene. It is easier to adopt a new Constitution than to amend the old one. The procedure for adopting the Basic Law exists and has been tested. Only who will allow?
    1. venaya
      venaya 27 January 2016 12: 59
      +3
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      The procedure for adopting the Basic Law exists and has been tested. Only who will allow?

      This is the main question, or rather the problem. We did not write, did not discuss, unlike the constitution of 1936, none of the subsequent constitutions, they simply imposed them on us.
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 27 January 2016 13: 13
        +8
        Quote: venaya
        We did not write, did not discuss, unlike the constitution of 1936, none of the subsequent constitutions, they simply imposed them on us.

        Do not tell. The draft USSR Constitution of 1977 was widely discussed. At the suggestions of citizens, as far as I remember, one was added and eight articles were amended. Now we can only dream of such a legislative process.
        1. Volzhanin
          Volzhanin 27 January 2016 14: 28
          -1
          Now head to think for whom to vote.
          Although no one voted for United Russia anyway, it somehow leaked into the lead ... smile
          1. Corporal Valera
            Corporal Valera 27 January 2016 16: 22
            -1
            Sorry, I accidentally poked a minus. In another comment, the plus hi
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 27 January 2016 13: 00
      +5
      Otherwise, you will have to put the question squarely before the legislators: whose interests do they really uphold?
      It is necessary to raise the question with an edge now, and not wait. This year is just right.
      The next elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation will be held on September 18, 2016
    3. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 27 January 2016 13: 47
      +6
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      In FIG Constitutional Assembly convene. It is easier to adopt a new Constitution than to amend the old one.

      Maybe it’s easier, but it seems that the first, the second option is a dead number. In the government and in the council of the federation (both houses) 90% of the sales thief ... Do not fail. Why would they cut their own eggs? I doubt it ...
    4. atlantida04
      atlantida04 27 January 2016 16: 17
      +1
      and who to ask?
  3. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 27 January 2016 12: 51
    +5
    But did not even pay attention to this problem !!!
    No forging yourself! So "on the sly" in the 90s we were "vtyuhali" THIS ???
    It is necessary to change and change immediately!
    Only without unnecessary fuss and pathos!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Sars
      Sars 27 January 2016 12: 59
      +9
      And who will write the new constitution? Deputies of the State Duma? Among which half are the people of Chubais, half are the people of Kudrin.
    3. Kolyan 2
      Kolyan 2 27 January 2016 13: 23
      +1
      "on the sly" in the 90s and we "vtyuhali" THIS
      The fact of the matter is that I turn in, there is no discussion with the people just on, sign and comply. But I think I'm not mistaken that 90% of the population did not even try to read it.
    4. PSih2097
      PSih2097 27 January 2016 15: 46
      0
      Quote: Mihalich17
      But did not even pay attention to this problem !!!
      No forging yourself! So "on the sly" in the 90s we were "vtyuhali" THIS ???

      Here is another article from the constitution:
      Article 9
      1. Land and other natural resources are used and protected in the Russian Federation as the basis of the life and activities of the peoples living in the relevant territory.
      2. Land and other natural resources may be in private, state, municipal and other forms of ownership.

      that is, that everything belongs to the people there is nothing ...
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. venaya
    venaya 27 January 2016 12: 57
    +2
    The bottom line is that all international treaties, and the US Constitution, too, serve as masters of life (money)

    It is impossible to disagree with this, all known constitutions are written by the depneg owners and there is evidence of this, this should always be taken into account.
  6. Mustachioed Georgian
    Mustachioed Georgian 27 January 2016 12: 59
    +5
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    in FIG constitutional assembly

    Schaub Ukraine did not work
  7. APS
    APS 27 January 2016 13: 02
    -2
    The most important thing the author forgot in the article is why to amend the Constitution, because of which, only because someone said something. Therefore, a minus.
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 27 January 2016 14: 33
      +2
      At least because of an article prohibiting having an ideology! A nation without ideology, that dumpling without meat! To develop .., but why, where, why and why - it is not clear. A society of disgusting consumers is obtained when there is no idea, especially a national one!
      Well, there are also a few dirty tricks laid down by the nitro-mericos.
    2. avia1991
      avia1991 27 January 2016 14: 37
      0
      Quote: APS
      The most important thing the author forgot in the article is why change the Constitution

      Well, if you are there - behind the Puddle - not up to date, this does not mean that there is no reason! lol
      The need to change the fundamental provisions is long overdue! However, who will do it? If by the Constitutional Assembly
      Drafts of such a law were submitted to the State Duma back in 1997, 1998, 2000 and 2007, but failed miserably (blocked by deputies)
      - means someone "above" is vigilant about the safety of the pro-American version of the text.
      It is interesting: can a national referendum solve this issue? .. Since the "people's representatives" actively refuse?
      I understand that his organization itself is a difficult question. But fundamentally - maybe?
  8. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 27 January 2016 13: 03
    0
    What works, leave. That in America’s favor - with the whole list of worthy scholars - let them give a head start to our reality. And to send our Komsomol warm greetings to America.
  9. pts-m
    pts-m 27 January 2016 13: 04
    -3
    It’s beneficial for someone to rewrite the laws of the state, recalling a popular saying ... the law that draws where you turned it and it turned out ... Therefore, constant shyness in emergency situations. It’s all like a setument with a fire when a bucket with oil instead of a bucket of water
    1. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 27 January 2016 13: 56
      +2
      Quote: PTS-m
      It is beneficial for someone to rewrite the laws of the state, recalling a popular saying ... the law that drew. Where it turned then it turned out ...

      FAVORABLE it was in the 90s, when the laws were written under the dictation of the American "druzhban" ... And now it is NECESSITY.
  10. made13
    made13 27 January 2016 13: 08
    +5
    While most of the assets of deputies will be in the West, there will be no changes.
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 27 January 2016 14: 35
      0
      If desired, you can send deputies there. Although it is better to develop the Arctic.
  11. shelva
    shelva 27 January 2016 13: 08
    +2
    Now, when it finally dawned on us - what kind of "friends" we have in the West, we would take and rewrite the constitution without looking back at the gay European crap, especially since this is not the first time for us.
  12. kepmor
    kepmor 27 January 2016 13: 13
    +4
    What the hell are the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation ?!
    What, to the devil, is the Constitutional Assembly ?!
    What are you about?! It is for them, our rulers, NECESSARY ?! They have everything chocolate!
    Now in our power, filthy, only one task is to leave everything as it is and rule as long as possible! After all, how much more good remained in Russia not stolen, I apologize, not privatized! God forbid the people will get all this!
  13. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf 27 January 2016 13: 14
    +4
    Or maybe it’s even easier to do? Adopt the new Constitution at once in a referendum, and take Stalin as the basis. There is no question for half a year, if the guarantor is really with the people, but vague doubts torment them more and more.
  14. Yuri Y.
    Yuri Y. 27 January 2016 13: 17
    +3
    It makes no difference, I think in this case, how to solve the problem, if it is solved. And long can turn into short if you deal with this issue. If the goal is necessary for independence, a change in the Constitution. Although of course I understand that the liberalists do not have such a goal and there will be obstacles.
  15. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 27 January 2016 13: 21
    +2
    To the author of article 1000 +,
    raises a very important issue for the country.
    Russia must be removed from the dictates of the United States; the country must have an internal segment of the economy that ensures independence from external factors, at least such segments as the defense industry, food security, stable employment, education and healthcare. Only in this case, the country can ensure stable development, and external forces will stop trying to "contain" the country when they understand that all their efforts will be in vain, they will not defeat Russia.
  16. Tra-ta-ta
    Tra-ta-ta 27 January 2016 13: 23
    0
    THERE IS NO RULES for what patterns to create this meeting in order for its education to be recognized as legitimate
    The will of the people is not subject to international law, and it does not need legitimacy.
    If Muscovites come out amicably and demand changes to the Constitution, then the Assembly will be created and vote "as it should."
    The subtlety is that the initiative should come from the people, not from the government, which is more worried about its own skin.
    1. Hell's Angel
      Hell's Angel 27 January 2016 13: 41
      +6
      If Muscovites come out together and demand a change in the Constitution, then
      Oh, I’m afraid to even imagine WHAT changes to the Constitution will require MUSCOVITES! And beyond MKAD there is no life for you?
      1. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 27 January 2016 14: 34
        +3
        It is not necessary to expect that Muscovites will demand amendments to the Constitution. Moscow is placed in special conditions, in comparison with other cities of the country. Muscovites are more likely to go to the swamp en masse, to the appeals of the West they will go for the opposition paid for.
        When they recall the 90s and claim that the people married Yeltsin, they mean that it was the Muscovites who were excited, and no one was interested in what happened in the regions of the country.
        And in the regions of the country there was an absolutely opposite situation. Industry was developed, and enterprises had their own social sphere, housing, children's, health and cultural and entertainment facilities. These enterprises solved the problems with nutrition back in the 80s by creating subsidiary farms, providing their social services with meat and vegetables. Personal subsidiary plots existed. People then did not understand the protests of Muscovites, the outback was calm.
        Moscow rose because of a lack of food, when the planned delivery of food to the capital was canceled.
        And when Yeltsin came to power and the seizure of effective enterprises through bankruptcy began throughout the country, the defense industry stopped without a government order, then there was a wave of rallies on the periphery of people who were left without means of livelihood, Muscovites did not care about the country: remember the indifference to the protests of miners at Bely at home.
        There is no hope of supporting the constitutional reform in Muscovites, they feel quite comfortable, large salaries, a lot of taxes go to the treasury, there are social co-payments.
        1. Kelwin
          Kelwin 27 January 2016 19: 16
          0
          Quote: olimpiada15
          Muscovites are more likely to go to the swamp en masse, to the appeals of the West they will go for the opposition paid for.

          Dear Evgenia, everyone who wanted to have already been there, a whole 1% of the city's population, and then, if you believe the data of the "organizers", so you don't need one size fits all ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 27 January 2016 14: 03
      +3
      Quote: Tra-ta-ta
      If Muscovites come out amicably and demand changes to the Constitution, then the Assembly will be created and vote "as it should."

      Why only Muscovites (I write with a little one)? There is such a country - Russia is called. Maybe they heard?
      And Moscow, in my opinion, is the least necessary.
  17. xorgi
    xorgi 27 January 2016 13: 24
    -4
    a strange article, I strongly doubt that it was written by a lawyer, at least because he OPEN ("I just (I don't know about you), to my shame, inattentively read our Basic Law, even though I am a lawyer by education.") that different chapters of the Constitution change in different ways.
    Now essentially. Chapter 1, article 15.
    1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation has the highest legal force, direct effect and is applied throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. Laws and other legal acts adopted in the Russian Federation shall not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
    4. The universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If the international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes other rules than those provided for by law, the rules of the international treaty are applied.
    I explain specifically for the author: an international treaty will prevail only if it is ACCEPTED in Russia, and it can be adopted in Russia only if it does not contradict the Constitution. And the norms of international law are an integral part of Russian law, but do not dominate it.
    Summary: The author is an ordinary provocateur. Election s.
    1. Nehist
      Nehist 27 January 2016 21: 35
      +1
      Are you laughing State where about article 15 of chapter one! Yes, they’ll put you in a mental hospital! Our constitution is purely declarative. For each article, a bunch of bylaws that nullify the entire constitution
      1. xorgi
        xorgi 28 January 2016 07: 16
        0
        I agree, but the article talks about the Constitution, and not about by-laws.
  18. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 27 January 2016 13: 49
    +5
    Many thanks to the author for the article!
    I've already broken my whole brain over this absurd raskoryak! I just could not understand where the dog is buried and why this idiocy happens!
    One thing is clear - if you want to initiate these processes and bring the matter to the desired result, it is not difficult. If you wish! It was necessary to start them already yesterday !!! Why didn’t they start?
    It is understandable that the comprador, collaborationist elite of the Russian government does not want to do this, but will cling to their seats with all their strength and claws, and make maximum efforts to do so - as if to stay at the top. Naturally, one cannot count on constructive processes and transformations in such an environment!
    As historical practice shows, such characters usually wallow down with a wild roar, while crippling or killing.
    Let's wait a little longer ...
    1. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 27 January 2016 14: 07
      0
      Explanatory commentary.

      Quote: Volzhanin
      Let's wait a little longer ...
      What's the point?
  19. su navy
    su navy 27 January 2016 14: 08
    +1
    Of course, you’ll worry. Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
    Article 2. The authorized capital and other property of the Bank of Russia are federal property. In accordance with the goals and in the manner established by this Federal Law, the Bank of Russia exercises authority to possess, use and dispose of the property of the Bank of Russia, including the Bank of Russia gold and currency reserves. Withdrawal and encumbrance of obligations of the specified property without the consent of the Bank of Russia are not allowed, unless otherwise provided by federal law. The state is not liable for the obligations of the Bank of Russia, and the Bank of Russia for the obligations of the state, if they have not assumed such obligations or unless otherwise provided by federal laws. The Bank of Russia carries out its expenses from its own income.
    Article 6. The Bank of Russia has the right to file lawsuits in courts in the manner determined by the legislation of the Russian Federation. The Bank of Russia has the right to apply for protection of its interests to international courts, courts of foreign states and arbitration courts.
    Article 22. The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to the Government of the Russian Federation to finance the federal budget deficit, to buy government securities at their initial placement, except as provided for by the federal law on the federal budget. The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to finance budget deficits of state extra-budgetary funds, budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets.
    Information for consideration.
    1. xorgi
      xorgi 27 January 2016 14: 54
      +1
      But can this be decrypted for non-lawyers? for example, I don’t see anything bad here
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Barnaul, Altai
        27 January 2016 22: 04
        -1
        Central Bank - reserves income at home, and the government cannot use these reserves without the consent of the Central Bank !!! It turns out that if the Central Bank wants to buy American debt obligations, then no one can interfere with it in this, either the GOVERNMENT or the PRESIDENT!
        Therefore, the Central Bank monthly buys American debt, even in the face of a budget deficit!
        And if, in turn, the government wants to invest, for example, in the production of civilian aircraft, then the Central Bank has the right to refuse it !!! That is why, under current legislation, it is impossible to carry out any projects!

        further: if any disputes arise between the government of the Russian Federation and the Central Bank, the latter, due to our constitution and the law on the Central Bank, has the right to appeal to the courts, for example, the UK !!!
        This is just an abnormal situation!
        in detail about the Central Bank, you can read the article in my instagram
        @leonov_evgeny
        It's called: "Made in USA"
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 27 January 2016 22: 31
          +1
          Quote: Barnaul, Altai
          Central Bank - reserves income at home, and the government cannot use these reserves without the consent of the Central Bank

          And this is normal.

          Quote: Barnaul, Altai
          It turns out that if the Central Bank wants to buy American debt obligations, then no one can interfere with it in this, neither the GOVERNMENT, nor the PRESIDENT!

          Lies. Type in the search engine "National Banking Council", read carefully:

          - who is appointed
          - of whom consists
          - rights and obligations

          This .. um .. body holds the Central Bank’s leadership literally for an Adam's apple - not to breathe, nor .. well, you understand.

          Quote: Barnaul, Altai
          Therefore, the Central Bank monthly buys American debt, even in the face of a budget deficit

          Not therefore.

          Quote: Barnaul, Altai
          ... The Central Bank has the right to refuse him !!!

          No need to scream like that, everything is more complicated there ... and not at all as bad as you are trying to draw ..

          Quote: Barnaul, Altai
          if any disputes arise between the government of the Russian Federation and the Central Bank, the latter, due to our constitution and the law on the Central Bank, has the right to apply to the courts, for example, the UK !!!

          Please provide an article of the Constitution .. or you - yap, dear ..

          Quote: Barnaul, Altai
          in detail about the Central Bank, you can read the article in my instagram

          If there is at the same level as here - it is better not to (read, in the sense).
        2. xorgi
          xorgi 28 January 2016 07: 20
          +2
          for Barnaul, Altai, Dear, you are missing the words "except for those cases when it is provided by federal law", from my point of view, the government does not have the opportunity to OPERATELY use the reserves of the Central Bank, only a long way through the Federal Assembly
  20. epsilon571
    epsilon571 27 January 2016 14: 23
    +1
    Thanks to the author. Not everyone understands the intricacies of constitutional legislation, and it is there, in the main law, a time bomb is laid down. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the main thing - the political system was taken away from Russia. In just a few years, we have turned from a leading socialist power into a country of oligarchic capitalism and have lost our sovereignty. Then, few people thought about the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and that was what the greedy authorities took advantage of. The main goal of the privatizers was the irrepressible enrichment, the looting of state resources and the privatization of everything and everything.

    It’s hard to correct what was lost, and most importantly, to be ashamed. We lost a lot, but we understood a lot - the fraud was revealed, do not miss your chance!
  21. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 27 January 2016 14: 57
    0
    The American constitution is very simple.

    Bill of rights.
    No. 1 Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, the right to petition
    No. 2 The right to store and carry weapons
    No. 3 It is forbidden to place soldiers in private homes without the consent of the owner
    No. 4 Prohibition of arbitrary searches and arrests
    No. 5 Right to due process, right not to incriminate oneself, guarantee of private property
    No. 6 Rights of the accused, including the right to a jury trial
    No. 7 The right to a jury trial in civil matters
    No. 8 Prohibition of excessive liens and fines, cruel and unusual punishments
    No. 9 Transfer of rights in the Constitution should not be interpreted as a diminution of other rights
    No. 10 Powers that the Constitution does not expressly relate to the jurisdiction of the United States are reserved by states and citizens.

    It must not be changed by anyone, nor by presidents, nor by Congress, nor by the Senate, or by the Supreme Court.
    So it has remained since 1789 ...
    1. xorgi
      xorgi 27 January 2016 15: 05
      0
      You are lying, 27 amendments have been adopted.
    2. Barnaul, Altai
      27 January 2016 22: 06
      0
      A hundred times they changed it (supplemented)!
  22. yakpkufpkup
    yakpkufpkup 27 January 2016 15: 28
    0
    The author casts a shadow on the wattle fence, so that those who doubt it can be carried along the wrong path, like Susanin the Poles.
    In general, this is a problem of today. Everyone scolds "ukrov" for their narrow-mindedness and unwillingness to see the obvious. Nevertheless, the situation is similar in Russia, although not in such a grotesque form that, in general, it does not change the essence. However, according to the subject. If the main law of the country was created by enemies and protects the interests of these very enemies, those who, without a liberation revolution, can replace it with a just one that protects the interests of the people, which they allegedly represent, do not change, then the conclusion suggests itself - they are also enemies. If everyone knows that education, social medicine, the military-industrial complex, agriculture, mechanical engineering are destroyed, and the corresponding bureaucrats are not only not punished, but are also awarded annually, then the conclusion is simple - the enemies of the people are in power. If the director of migration policy officially declares that "the country's indigenous population is dying out, decreasing by 2 million annually, but is being successfully replaced by migrants," and the person performing the functions of the president states that "the migration policy is being implemented ahead of schedule," then the conclusion is simple - enemies of the people have seized power in the country, in whose "schedules" the replacement of us with "migrants" has come. If it's not a secret for anyone that this "crisis" (artificially created, by the way) has led to the impoverishment of the people, but at the same time the number of billionaires in the country has increased, then the one who took over the authority to govern the country is responsible. Why, one wonders, do the "people's" court solder 3 years in a strict regime colony for stealing a chicken from hunger, and for the collapse of industries, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, the appropriation of the wealth of OUR subsoil, the untouchable caste receives medals, titles and other kosher buns? Their actors from the TV screen openly declare to us that "our Jewish ancestors have been here since the second century, and your Slavic ancestors have been here only since the sixth century, so don't be rude when visiting" (Solovyov), that "Russia is no longer a country of Russians" (Kandelaki), that "Russians were_dlots who need to be destroyed" (Sobchak), but no one punishes them for calling for genocide and interethnic strife, on the contrary, they are rewarded and receive all kinds of privileges. Why don't we take the example of the Jews who do not allow non-Jews to rule Israel?
    In general, the conclusion is simple, if someone took over the functions, but not only failed, but also caused damage to the state, that is, to you and me, then he certainly must be punished, regardless of his merits, status, nationality.
    Imagine such a hypothetical situation: Stalin cannot respond to Hitler's aggression, because it de contradicts the "constitution" that the Germans wrote for us. Who is he after that?

    I strongly suspect that "Yevgeny Leonov" is the pseudonym of some "Bronstein" who hides behind the name of the beloved People's Artist.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. afrikanez
    afrikanez 27 January 2016 16: 18
    0
    I wonder where the drafters of our Constitution are now?
    1. Stinger
      Stinger 27 January 2016 16: 47
      +1
      In warm places.
    2. Barnaul, Altai
      27 January 2016 22: 08
      0
      In all 50 states! laughing laughing laughing
  25. Villon
    Villon 27 January 2016 22: 38
    0
    Quote: 11 black
    Quote: vyakpkufkup
    The author casts a shadow on the wattle fence, so that those who doubt it can be carried along the wrong path, like Susanin the Poles.
    In general, this is a problem of today. Everyone scolds "ukrov" for their narrow-mindedness and unwillingness to see the obvious. Nevertheless, the situation is similar in Russia, although not in such a grotesque form that, in general, it does not change the essence. However, according to the subject. If the main law of the country was created by enemies and protects the interests of these very enemies, those who, without a liberation revolution, can replace it with a just one that protects the interests of the people, which they allegedly represent, do not change, then the conclusion suggests itself - they are also enemies. If everyone knows that education, social medicine, the military-industrial complex, agriculture, mechanical engineering are destroyed, and the corresponding bureaucrats are not only not punished, but are also awarded annually, then the conclusion is simple - the enemies of the people are in power. If the director of migration policy officially declares that "the country's indigenous population is dying out, decreasing by 2 million annually, but is being successfully replaced by migrants," and the person performing the functions of the president states that "the migration policy is being implemented ahead of schedule," then the conclusion is simple - enemies of the people have seized power in the country, in whose "schedules" the replacement of us with "migrants" has come. If it's not a secret for anyone that this "crisis" (artificially created, by the way) has led to the impoverishment of the people, but at the same time the number of billionaires in the country has increased, then the one who took over the authority to govern the country is responsible. Why, one wonders, do the "people's" court solder 3 years in a strict regime colony for stealing a chicken from hunger, and for the collapse of industries, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, the appropriation of the wealth of OUR subsoil, the untouchable caste receives medals, titles and other kosher buns? Their actors from the TV screen openly declare to us that "our Jewish ancestors have been here since the second century, and your Slavic ancestors have been here only since the sixth century, so don't be rude when visiting" (Solovyov), that "Russia is no longer a country of Russians" (Kandelaki), that "Russians were_dlots who need to be destroyed" (Sobchak), but no one punishes them for calling for genocide and interethnic strife, on the contrary, they are rewarded and receive all kinds of privileges. Why don't we take the example of the Jews who do not allow non-Jews to rule Israel?
    In general, the conclusion is simple, if someone took over the functions, but not only failed, but also caused damage to the state, that is, to you and me, then he certainly must be punished, regardless of his merits, status, nationality.
    Imagine such a hypothetical situation: Stalin cannot respond to Hitler's aggression, because it de contradicts the "constitution" that the Germans wrote for us. Who is he after that?

    I strongly suspect that "Yevgeny Leonov" is the pseudonym of some "Bronstein" who hides behind the name of the beloved People's Artist.

    Nonsense designed for a patriotic urya, you can be sure about VVP and its immediate entourage, there are a number of reasons, I can describe them in detail and with explanations, actually I have already painted them, but "too long commentary", there is no desire to type all this again.
    But you are mistaken! Enemies really are in power, but not at the highest posts.

    You are sorry, of course, but modern computer technology allows you to copy the old comment and paste it into a new one without typing again. This is the first time I hear that there is evidence that enemies are in power, but not in top posts.
    1. yakpkufpkup
      yakpkufpkup 27 January 2016 23: 25
      +2
      Ok, for a second:
      1. Suppose that there is a certain abstract head of an organization, which was created in order to maintain a multi-apartment multi-storey residential building in a functioning state with a boiler room attached to it (the house), power grids and other necessary infrastructure. The builders of this house live in this house, who appointed this leader to maintain order in their house, moreover, they pay him a salary. In the subordination of this citizen there are 10 employees who unscrew the light bulbs in the entrances, sell fire fittings for non-ferrous metals, break down the windows, pull apart the boiler room, cut off the electric wires and in every possible way pull this house apart by bricks. Instead of punishing his subordinates, this citizen-leader encourages his subordinates in every possible way, paying them astronomical salaries at the expense of the residents. At the same time, he declares that some neighboring hooligans are to blame for everything, and he and his team are only doing their job. At the same time, he deceives the residents of their apartments, and sells the seized housing to the Gypsies, who do not give a shit in the house, moreover, they shit in every corner, break bricks out of the house and take them to his Gypsy, in return giving the residents toilet paper painted with gouache. And the head informs the residents that toilet paper and gouache are not cheap these days, and therefore it is necessary to take away all the apartments in the house from the residents, and give the vacated space to other Chuchmeks for new rolls of priceless paper. Accordingly, this citizen is not responsible for the eviction, killing of residents, pulling away the house, since both he and his team are crystal clear, like the lambs of God, and some "drums-fifth elements" are to blame for everything, which no one has seen, but about which everyone has heard a lot ... And suddenly it turns out that both this citizen and his "team" have in the neighboring area a palace, a limousine, a heap and other fintiplushki, which they de earned by honest labor, injecting godlessly "like slaves in galleys."
      2. Now imagine that this citizen does not rule the house, but for a moment - the country.

      An even shorter and grotesque example:
      3. There is a caravan, travelers are hiring a group of armed guards for their protection. Members of this group on the way slowly rob the caravan. Where a pinch cuts a shovel from a gaping traveler, one of them in the bushes will kill another traveler, robbing him along the way, where he will take away the precious cargo in the open. At the same time, the leader of the gang will say that he and his group have nothing to do with it, and that the blame for all the losses are fucking mosquitoes, and they themselves are absolutely clean, and in general they work and starve without sparing themselves, because their bodies are heavy and their faces shine, and the rings are gold and other tsatzki they "earned" by honest labor. And in general, says the leader of the gang, it is necessary to fight robberies, and therefore he introduces an additional quitrent.
  26. Fat
    Fat 28 January 2016 00: 08
    0
    Plan USA is not involved here. Did any of the commentators bother to just re-read the Constitution of the Russian Federation once again before posting? I doubt it. Does anyone remember the words of the Anthem by heart? Who can distinguish the modern coat of arms of the Russian Federation from the coat of arms of the Russian Empire, especially if you cover the crown? Why should the Basic Law of the Russian Federation go against "universal" values? The author of the article clearly provokes a negative, therefore the article is 0, I do not give any minuses to the articles. Let me remind the "clickers" that Russia is NOT EUROPE. Normal men do not behave "weakly", and if brought "to the handle" they can answer "asymmetrically". One "decil" offers to throw out the child along with the dirty water, but he went farther into "democracy". On that I stand and think so. I have the honor stop
    PS Authors: Shakhrai Sergei Mikhailovich, Anatoly Sobchak, Constitutional Meeting of the Russian Federation, Alekseev Sergey Sergeevich.
  27. Fat
    Fat 28 January 2016 00: 42
    0
    A referendum (popular vote) on the adoption of the draft Constitution of the Russian Federation was held on December 12, 1993, simultaneously with the election of deputies to the State Duma and the Federation Council - the chambers of the Federal Assembly - the Russian parliament, introduced by the final and transitional provisions of the adopted Constitution. What? Then they voted, and now "she is not like that"? That no one knew that the Constitution is not a walking girl? Interestingly, the published article is not VBROS in order to drain the Crimea?
    1. yakpkufpkup
      yakpkufpkup 28 January 2016 01: 08
      +3
      I recall:
      1. The people were "tagged" driven to such poverty and despair that they agreed to everything, especially since since 1953 the parasites who usurped the power instilled in people with increasing intensity over the years that the "scoop" is bad, and capitalism does not rot at all, but on the contrary. I remember how children were bribed with "Lunaparkovskoy" chewing gum, how Europeans of aborigines with glass beads, showed colorful pictures, well-fed life. In short, the people were basely deceived. I remember the artificially created deficit, cards like during the war, ruined enterprises and collective farms. I saw how skinny hungry, as if escaped from a concentration camp, calves licked empty troughs in the corners, trying to get at least a crumb, I remember broken, stolen equipment.
      2. Despite this, 80% of the people voted against the separation of the USSR, but this did not affect the fate of the great power, ours. A handful of enemies of the people disposed of themselves in accordance with their vile essence and selfish interest. Of course, there is considerable fault of the people themselves, only the mistake goes back to the 53rd year. Our fathers allowed the presumptuous party bonzes to kill and slander the real patriots with impunity, douse them with mud and trample them in the mud. Then they dragged them by the pork tails from the Kremlin, punished them in public, today there would not have been this bunch of alien, clad in lapserdaki untouchable caste, imagining itself to be rulers, brazenly robbing the country. However, history, as you know, does not tolerate subjunctive moods.
      3. As for the Crimea. There was a referendum in Crimea, and as today, 90% of its population was for joining the RSFSR, but as you know, this has not changed anything.

      Z.Y. Fat troll, fat.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. yakpkufpkup
      yakpkufpkup 28 January 2016 01: 43
      +1
      As far as the mythical "constitutional" referendum is concerned, that is generally a complete oversight. Who today, given the disproportionately necessary large number of lawyers, is able to objectively delve into the very essence of the legal language? Few, apart from professional lawyers, are able to delve into the mind-boggling legal array. What to say about those who have never thought about these things? What could doctors, teachers, turners, miners understand in these minotaur labyrinths? Moreover, as it turns out, this did not in any way affect the outcome of the fraudulent manipulations of the compradors.
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. vvv-73
    vvv-73 12 February 2016 21: 51
    0
    All this is complete garbage and boltology. If the ruling elite had a need for such a change, then the constitution would be amended to bypass all laws, backed up by law with force. And no one would blather.