Bloomberg: Russia and the United States are close to compromise on inter-Syrian negotiations

51
Russia and the United States are ready to make some concessions on the upcoming negotiations on the settlement of the Syrian crisis, reports RIA News post bloomberg.

Bloomberg: Russia and the United States are close to compromise on inter-Syrian negotiations


“Disagreements between Russia and the United States lie in the composition of the opposition delegation in the negotiations on Syria. But now the risks of breakdown of negotiations are minimal, ”the newspaper notes.

According to Bloomberg, "Staffan de Mistura (UN special envoy for Syria) will invite two separate delegations of the Syrian opposition to Geneva." It is expected that the details will be covered by Special Envoy 25 January at the briefing.

According to the source, “Moscow can go to participate in the negotiations of the radical“ Army of Islam ”, which is supported by Saudi Arabia, and Washington, for its part, is ready to agree to a delegation coming to Geneva, which is friendly to Moscow (meaning former vice Prime Minister of Syria, now the representative of the Popular Front for Change, Kadri Jamil and the leader of the Kurdish Democratic Union Salih Muslim) ”.

Earlier, Sergei Lavrov and Secretary of State John Kerry discussed the preparation of negotiations by telephone. According to the press service of the Russian Foreign Ministry, "the parties paid special attention to the need to form a truly representative delegation of the opposition."
  • http://mk-london.co.uk/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +16
      24 January 2016 13: 38
      Amerikosov is always interested in consent only on their terms. All other points of view are wrong. You can discuss until the second coming, and still remain with your opinions ...
      1. +28
        24 January 2016 13: 45
        Yes, there will be no sense in tomorrow's talks, this Islamic Army is not much different from ISIS and Al Qaeda. A kind of image of Minsk will be obtained, as they continued to fight, they will, but for some reason Russia will be blamed for this. hi
        1. +13
          24 January 2016 13: 55
          Lavrov cannot be envied, almost every day you have to negotiate with American "friends" knowing
        2. +10
          24 January 2016 13: 59
          Only one single "compromise" is possible with the Yankees - hands off Syria! request
        3. +5
          24 January 2016 15: 57
          but for some reason Russia will be blamed for this.


          So blaming Russia is sacred. If the second coming of Christ in Moscow took place, then Russia would be to blame for this. This is a matter of American presence. If Assad's victory would be without the participation of the Americans, then this is fraught with a catastrophic weakening of the US in the entire Middle East. Apparently, a bargaining dog rummaged around here, the inviolability of American interests in the region (which is not bad. What if someone kissed the Arabs on the gums) in exchange for what? The lifting of sanctions? Ukraine? Assad? Or all together in an indirect proportion?
        4. +2
          24 January 2016 17: 14
          Quote: vlad66
          Yes, there will be no sense in tomorrow's talks, this Islamic Army is not much different from ISIS and Al Qaeda. A kind of image of Minsk will be obtained, as they continued to fight, they will, but for some reason Russia will be blamed for this. hi

          Would you agree to marry Radical? for what?
          1. +8
            24 January 2016 19: 12
            Quote: valokordin
            Would you agree to marry Radical? for what?

            Avona how, firstly respected valokordin, my wife married me 26 years ago, and please do not contact me with such suggestions. And I'm a normal orientation.hi And what for what? What feces? hi
      2. +3
        24 January 2016 13: 48
        There a hand washes a hand! I think they have agreed on everything for a long time, not when they will not tell the whole truth, because the management system prohibits doing this!
        1. +9
          24 January 2016 14: 06
          Our task is to wet the devils ...
          Here the owners stirred ...)))
          1. +5
            24 January 2016 14: 43
            RIA News. The Syrian army, with the support of militia units, has taken control of the city of Ar-Rabia in the province of Latakia in the north of the country, according to a Syrian national agency SANA, citing a military source. It is believed that the killers of a Russian pilot are hiding in this city. Now the assault on the city continues in the north-west and south, a number of small groups of terrorists have been cut off from their accomplices and are trying to break into the province of Idlib towards the settlement of Herbet al-Jos.
          2. +3
            24 January 2016 15: 22
            Quote: MIKHAN
            Here the owners stir ...

            Do not flatter yourself.
            The Americans have a pre-election year, the old president, as a rule, doesn’t want to decide anything and doesn’t decide, but there isn’t a new one yet. And American weakness can be mistaken for victory, but this is a mistake. They all turn their own back on, they don’t need peace.
        2. 0
          24 January 2016 20: 30
          Quote: shooter18
          There a hand washes a hand!

          Despite the fact that politics is a dirty business, I think your opinion is wrong. What truth do you want to hear? A shorthand of the negotiations. They won’t really tell us this. Whether it is necessary. I believe it is not. The desired result is important in Russia’s favor. Let at least the muzzles there be beaten to each other. And the state governance system is simple. It is under the manual control of the president The media agree with this), but it’s good in foreign policy. It's terrible in economics. I don’t understand why Putin will not disperse these liberals. But ... hope dies last. hi
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +4
        24 January 2016 15: 45
        Quote: oleg-gr
        You can discuss until the second coming, and still remain with your opinions ...


        You can write or write to all sorts of "partners" for a long time, but Lavrov oppresses his line.
  2. +19
    24 January 2016 13: 37
    Bloomberg: Russia and the United States are close to compromise on inter-Syrian negotiations
    (cry)
    1. +17
      24 January 2016 13: 38
      ready to go on some concessions


      -My mother says that I should be wearing a hat at the wedding.
      -I say I want a veil.
      -And what does the groom want?
      -And he doesn’t want to get married ... lol
    2. +2
      24 January 2016 13: 59
      Well, you, Andrey Yurievich, give it! - New "tools" of diplomacy.
      1. +13
        24 January 2016 14: 30
        American diplomats know how to keep punch laughing
  3. avt
    +9
    24 January 2016 13: 39
    Our campaign was SELLED, contrary to the position of the Turks and Sauds. The presence of the Kurdish delegation and members of the Assad government! good
    1. +7
      24 January 2016 13: 46
      Well, the Americans themselves dragged the Kurds, they have global plans for Kurdistan. And they are forced to endure Assad until the next election, but the fact that some other terrorists were recognized as moderate is bad
  4. +8
    24 January 2016 13: 42
    Ordinary American trade, they still insist that there are right and wrong barmales.
  5. +5
    24 January 2016 13: 45
    Yes, yes, the main word is "concessions".
    USA: "We are ready to make concessions, provided that our conditions are accepted!"
    1. +1
      24 January 2016 14: 02
      We will respond with "reciprocity" to the "concessions" of amers!
  6. +6
    24 January 2016 13: 45
    I'll bet on Lavrov. This one will sell "our line". Kerry is rather weak against him. Again, as the hegemons do not puff their cheeks, and the Aerospace Forces and the Armed Forces of the SAR are clearly winning in the military sense, therefore, the negotiations will be held under the dictation of the "strong". The Turks also stepped on a corn by inviting the Syrian Kurds.
    Well, soon we will see everything with our own eyes.
    1. +7
      24 January 2016 13: 48
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Turks also stepped on a corn

      They stepped on the eggs, and not on the corn. Yes
      1. +4
        24 January 2016 14: 00
        They stepped on their eggs without even inviting the Ottomans to negotiate ..
    2. +6
      24 January 2016 13: 49
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The Turks also stepped on a corn, inviting the Syrian Kurds.

      Well no,,. laughing , for the Turks, the Kurds are not a Faberge corn! So let's see how it is steel ..
  7. +7
    24 January 2016 13: 48
    The only possible compromise between Russia and America is that they stop shitting on us, for a while we stop dreaming of destroying America.
    1. avt
      +5
      24 January 2016 13: 54
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      The only possible compromise between Russia and America is that they stop shitting on us, for a while we stop dreaming of destroying America.

      No. "Only when everyone is dead, only then will the Great Game end."
    2. +2
      24 January 2016 14: 03
      Wrong compromise .. They are Alaska to us, and we allow them to leave planet Earth .. Everyone will breathe a sigh of relief ..
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      The only possible compromise between Russia and America is that they stop shitting on us, for a while we stop dreaming of destroying America.
    3. 0
      24 January 2016 14: 39
      Well, you (you) Michael, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye !.
  8. +4
    24 January 2016 13: 48
    Kurds should be present on anyone.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      24 January 2016 13: 57
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      Kurds should be present on anyone.

      And what is so categorically important in Kurds?
      Maybe someone will explain to me? No, I certainly do not mind, of course, they should be present - just what is their importance?
      The conversation will be about one thing - Assad leaves or not and about the subsequent device of Syria.
      I think Russia will try to push through the federalization of Syria.
      Federalization in the BV is a new joke.
      These parts of the federation automatically turn into separate states. Well, the result - Syria will fall apart, which in general is very, but not bad.
      United Syria, this is of course the victory of the Sunnis in the elections, of course, the Kurds will not be touched. but the Alawites were slowly crushed all over.
      I think hardly agree on what.
      Although Russia is beginning to understand that it is necessary to look for some way out because Assad cannot capture the whole of Syria, let alone keep it, and the war will go on endlessly with it.
      1. +5
        24 January 2016 14: 03
        The Kurds have considerable strength and this is not an unimportant factor in their presence in the negotiations.
        1. +2
          24 January 2016 14: 38
          In addition, the Kurds present in the negotiations will irritate Erdoganchik that the same is not bad.
      2. +7
        24 January 2016 14: 09
        Well, yes, you sleep and see the collapse of Syria. But for some reason you are offended by Mikhan who, with all his heart, wishes the same to you.
      3. +12
        24 January 2016 14: 12
        Quote: atalef
        The conversation will be about one thing - Assad leaves or not and about the subsequent device of Syria.

        Welcome hi You repeat the mantra
        Quote: atalef
        Syria will fall apart, which is generally very good.

        Quote: atalef
        I think hardly agree on what.

        Here I completely agree with you. hi
        Quote: atalef
        Although Russia is beginning to understand that it is necessary to look for some way out because Assad cannot capture the whole of Syria, let alone keep it, and the war will go on endlessly with it.

        But come on, dear Alexander, we’ll wait a little longer and will not vang. We will see how it ends and then we will discuss it. With respect hi
      4. +3
        24 January 2016 15: 29
        Quote: atalef
        And what is so categorically important in the Kurds? Can someone explain to me?

        The Kurds control a not weak piece of Syria and Iraq, the oil fields of Iraq are just on the land of the Kurds. Kurds historically live there and this is already an important factor.
        That's what it is to invite the Army of Islam, which no one knew yesterday, but a bunch of groups similar to gangs ............ if only to sign the surrender protocol
      5. 0
        24 January 2016 20: 09
        The whole point is in the division of Syria into enclaves. Do Jews seem to see it? Instead of a strong Arab country, they need a handful of small regions with self-government. Will you try to convince?
  9. BAT
    +5
    24 January 2016 13: 51
    But as for me, the Americans are just afraid to stay empty. As in 1944. They understand that Assad, with the help of our VKS, will sooner or later squeeze out all the evil from Syria. So they fussed. But you have to somehow keep a good face with no game at all. So they begin to set some conditions, knowing in advance that Russia will not agree to them. And still, they will make concessions and will not go anywhere. They stalled in Syria and on the outskirts.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      24 January 2016 14: 06
      Quote: sichevik
      They understand that Assad, with the help of our VKS, will sooner or later squeeze out all the evil from Syria. So fussed

      If that were so. then neither Russia would go to negotiations for Assad.
      maybe what is the point of negotiating. if you win so?
      A contract always implies a compromise.

      Quote: sichevik
      But you have to somehow keep a good face with no game at all

      To date, Assad’s troops have not achieved dramatic changes.
      Take it as a fact
      Quote: sichevik
      So they begin to set some conditions, knowing in advance that Russia will not agree to them

      a question. why should Russia even participate in these negotiations? If everything is so good
      Quote: sichevik
      They stalled in Syria and on the outskirts.

      An interesting offer, interesting, but who do you mean?
      1. +4
        24 January 2016 14: 14
        Negotiations are needed to stop the "All against All" massacre and it is beneficial for Assad in terms of concentration on specific areas, and not on all fronts.
      2. +12
        24 January 2016 14: 58
        Quote: atalef
        To date, Assad’s troops have not achieved dramatic changes.

        The Syrian army and militia forces recaptured the city of Ar-Rabia in the north of Latakia province from the militants. In addition, the settlement of Ar-Road was liberated, Interfax reports.
        During the operation, a large number of terrorists were destroyed along with weapons. According to Reuters, the capture of the city opened the way for the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s troops to enter the border with Turkey. In January, government forces recaptured the city of Salma, which the bandits have been holding since 2012. We understand that Alexander did not make drastic changes. fellow Best regards hi
        1. +6
          24 January 2016 15: 04
          This is Ataraf kamarad wrote about the Golan Heights, there they cherish and cherish their terrorists, and control so that Assad does not offend them
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            24 January 2016 15: 11
            Quote: Lalaika
            This is Ataraf kamarad wrote about the Golan Heights, there they cherish and cherish their terrorists, and control so that Assad does not offend them

            Are these those with whom the videoconferencing is now collaborating?
            1. +5
              24 January 2016 15: 12
              No, these are the ones that Israel treats.
        2. -2
          24 January 2016 15: 08
          Quote: vovanpain
          Quote: atalef
          To date, Assad’s troops have not achieved dramatic changes.

          The Syrian army and militia forces recaptured the city of Ar-Rabia in the north of Latakia province from the militants. In addition, the settlement of Ar-Road was liberated, Interfax reports.
          During the operation, a large number of terrorists were destroyed along with weapons. According to Reuters, the capture of the city opened the way for the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s troops to enter the border with Turkey. In January, government forces recaptured the city of Salma, which the bandits have been holding since 2012. We understand that Alexander did not make drastic changes. fellow Best regards hi

          Look where it all is and you will understand. that there are no cardinal changes.
          Latakia Province.
          I'm not saying that the city is somehow strongly said
          Salma (Arabic: سلمى) is a village in northwestern Syria, located in the territory of Latakia governorate. It is part of the Huff district (English) Russian .. The population in 2010 was 2131 inhabitants.
          1. +7
            24 January 2016 15: 29
            Quote: atalef
            Look where it all is and you will understand. that there are no cardinal changes.
            Latakia Province.
            I'm not saying that the city is somehow strongly said

            And you need everything at once, you yourself know that it doesn’t happen. Look at Alexander, my comment is higher, but I repeat we wait and see, and to vang and make a bad sign for the future. Best regards hi
          2. +4
            24 January 2016 17: 15
            The senator called the capture of Ar-Rabi in Syria a serious blow to the oil traffic of the Islamic State in Turkey
            24 January 2016, 17: 02
            The capture of the city of Ar-Rabia in the province of Latakia will make it possible to block one of the sections of the Syrian-Turkish border through which oil is smuggled from territories controlled by the Islamic State, said First Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security Franz Klintsevich.

            It’s not the size that matters, but the location
        3. The comment was deleted.
      3. +4
        24 January 2016 16: 40
        Quote: atalef
        a question. why should Russia even participate in these negotiations? If everything is so good


        Negotiations do not always indicate the need to negotiate. Tactically, this is a good way:
        - slow down the opponent so that he does not take active actions;
        - find out any information,
        - disclose the plans of the parties;
        - set sides against each other by sowing distrust in another camp;
        - feed any misinformation;
        - and much, much more, choose to taste.

        In any case, taking into account many third parties such as the USA, Turkey, CA and others, it is always useful to listen to all the positions. We learn a lot of interesting things, understand how to proceed. And to show a constructive position is never harmful.
  10. +1
    24 January 2016 14: 01
    and Assad was invited?
  11. +6
    24 January 2016 14: 19
    Well, yes, they will sign a couple of papers that do not give anything to one of the parties! There must be peace in Syria on the conditions of Russia and Assad.
  12. +2
    24 January 2016 14: 23
    The former Syria, anyway, will not exist. The Americans make a base in the north of Syria in the region, in fact, controlled by Turkey. Syrian Kurds are holding their territory. The Saudis, with the help of "moderate terrorists" and Daesh, control the eastern part. Each side will hold its own piece with its teeth. Therefore, either a war to "blue in the face", or a break in parts. At best, federalization of Syria. We will agree to this, subject to the federalization of Ukraine.
    1. +4
      24 January 2016 14: 26
      Quote: askort154
      The former Syria, already for any, will not be.


      MOSCOW, October 21 - RIA News. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad visited Moscow on Tuesday evening, where he held talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The presidents discussed issues related to the continuation of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces and the Syrian army.
      In the negotiations it was noted that the victory over terrorism in Syria will be won, and after military operations political steps are necessary. Moscow is convinced that a long-term settlement in the Arab Republic is possible only on the basis of a political process.
  13. +4
    24 January 2016 14: 32
    Will I live to see the time when someone says to mattresses - By what right do you meddle in the affairs of other countries? Sit still, breathe evenly, and vyakte- angry
  14. +3
    24 January 2016 14: 40
    As always, the United States is making headaches for the world, and in the meantime, it is deploying ground forces. They will not allow Assad to live peacefully, in any case. All Syrian oil wells have long been divided among the "US ELITE". Our troops in Syria are like a bone in the throat of the Americans. But how will it end?
  15. +3
    24 January 2016 14: 45
    Quote: atalef
    Federalization in the BV is a new joke.

    - A new anegdote, or fire-fedot, - in fact - an "anecdote" - a witty short fiction.
  16. +3
    24 January 2016 14: 47
    There are no negotiations, the Naglosaks understand only the language of power, after sanctions on hohlopopiya, there will be sanctions on Litvenko, whom the Britons themselves eliminated by accusing Russia.
  17. +3
    24 January 2016 15: 06
    Oh, and what is this))) ours, they brought some kind of pipes to Syria, maybe for the water supply system, or maybe for gas)))
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      24 January 2016 16: 03
      Quote: Imperial
      Oh, and what is this))) ours, they brought some kind of pipes to Syria, maybe for the water supply system, or maybe for gas)))


      They made fun, colleague. Or maybe those pipes are Jericho, purely from KRET? Uh, I'm not joking. I know about what I’m talking about ...
      1. +3
        24 January 2016 16: 09
        Yes, that's actually the pipelayers for the work)))
        1. +1
          25 January 2016 00: 06
          Quote: Imperial
          Yes, that's actually the pipelayers for the work)))


          Well, what is so-and-so? good The pipes were laid. Work, it is work. If we are proud of our achievements in public - this is how apple trees on Mars will never bloom. But we are all waiting, I want it, damn it, well, the astronauts promised the same, wait again. Well, we have to go there, to Mars, for apples and for knowledge ... And then there is some America with its poop. Handbrake of civilization.
  18. +5
    24 January 2016 15: 31
    Something, in the West they began to trumpet strenuously about "breakthroughs in negotiations, prospects and even a possible lifting of sanctions"! Smells like another political and diplomatic pod!
    1. +1
      24 January 2016 17: 12
      Quote: Leprechaun
      It smacks of another political and diplomatic trick!


      "somewhere in the galaxy there is a place where politics and well, it is clear that they are not synonymous?"
      This was written in one stupid fantasy book.
  19. 0
    24 January 2016 15: 49
    Any successful negotiations certainly imply a reasonable compromise. The main thing is that the concessions should not be one-sided (from our side and Assad).
  20. -1
    24 January 2016 15: 49
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Our task is to wet the devils ...
    Here the owners stirred ...)))

    Even the foreign tourist was raging ...
    Is it possible to say so in general terms - what does he need?
  21. +1
    24 January 2016 16: 51
    So after all, even without negotiations, everything is going very well, as Russia needs, as planned by the General Staff. But the Americans do not like this, so they needed "negotiations". Russia and Syria do not need this, there is still no one to negotiate with. Then why is this event necessary at all ???
  22. +1
    24 January 2016 19: 17
    Knowing the "honesty" of the Americans and the price of agreements with them, and also taking into account the commitment of the Russian authorities, in the presence of military successes, to sit them in places like "Minsk" and "Khasavyurt", I conclude that Assad is doomed to either leave his post or stay for another for a while as a wedding general. Westerners are screaming with might and main about constructiveness in Syrian affairs. So the main question is agreed. It remains to agree on many technical details. The "honor" of Assad's departure is very important. This is one of the most important conditions for Moscow.
    1. 0
      24 January 2016 20: 24
      Have you personally participated in the preparation of the negotiations?
      1. 0
        24 January 2016 23: 36
        Quote: ty60
        YOU PERSONALLY

        Of course not. And I really want to make a mistake in my conclusions. But most likely I'm right.
  23. +3
    24 January 2016 20: 28
    I do not believe the Americans ...
  24. 0
    24 January 2016 21: 30
    There is such a character in a fairy tale - a cat bayan! He speaks and lulls with his fairy tales the travelers who have approached and those of them who lack the strength to resist his magic and who have not prepared for battle with him, the sorcerer cat mercilessly kills .....

    Useless American talking-negotiating room does not bode well. Sweet promises will still not be fulfilled .......
  25. 0
    24 January 2016 21: 52
    I think that it’s impossible to reconcile the bandits who fought with the Syrian people. Amerikosy do everything to stick their terrorists in the government, to constantly stir up water, and later seize power. Russia needs to keep a brand here in order to reduce all risks for Syria in the future.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"