Military Review

Stratfor: images from space recorded in Syria, the military activity of the Americans

81
Photos from the satellite indicate that Americans are expanding the runway in the north-east of Syria, reports RIA News message analytic center Stratfor.


Stratfor: images from space recorded in Syria, the military activity of the Americans


"According to December 28, the length of the runway at the airfield in the province of Al-Hasakah was almost doubled, to 1,3 kilometer," - said in a statement by American analysts.

It is noted that "the length of the strip is sufficient for the take-off and landing of the American military transport aircraft Lockheed C-130 Hercules".

According to the BBC, which published the message, before the civil war, this airfield "was used for agricultural purposes, and now it is under the control of the Kurds."

Center experts believe that "the new infrastructure will allow the United States to create an air bridge to supply the Syrian democratic army in the fight against the IG group."

The editors of the BBC, in turn, adds that the increase in the band "may also indicate that the US is planning new actions against the IG."

Stratfor noted that a number of publications previously reported the intention of the US Air Force to equip an airfield in Syria, but there was no documentary evidence of this.
Photos used:
twitter.com/RIA News
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. yuriy55
    yuriy55 23 January 2016 12: 37
    72
    1. Check with Assad if he gave permission.
    2. Level with the landscape ...
    am
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 23 January 2016 12: 39
      68
      Well, all climbed bastards ... They think the ruble fell, oil, too .. RUSSIA KNEELED? Heh heh .. What a blunder!
      1. kil 31
        kil 31 23 January 2016 12: 43
        19
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, all climbed bastards ...

        And not just climbed, but in emergency mode. Interestingly, they were made to so fuss so abruptly.
        1. cniza
          cniza 23 January 2016 13: 05
          +8
          The United States will not calm down until it receives as it should from the Syrian army.
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 23 January 2016 13: 22
            +8
            Quote: cniza
            The United States will not calm down until it receives as it should from the Syrian army.

            .. a couple of SCADs are enough .. 9K72-O complex with a 8K14-1F missile .. Assad has them, only 70 km from El-Kamyshly. .. laughing
            1. BaLaLaykin
              BaLaLaykin 23 January 2016 13: 33
              +7
              And all the shobla (NATO) will rush to tear Assad under a legitimate pretext, including Israel
              1. Zoldat_A
                Zoldat_A 23 January 2016 14: 10
                13
                Quote: Lalaika
                And the whole shobla (nato) rushes to tear Assad on a legitimate pretext including Israel

                Have you tried it before? Moreover, now tearing Assad means us along with him. Our people in Syria will not sit and watch how Assad is dragged by the feet along the streets! And contact us gykanut. Although - the Turks shot down our plane - maybe to check - how will we behave? Check satisfied America - no return. So they messed up ...
              2. dorz
                dorz 23 January 2016 15: 05
                +9
                In short, without any legal basis, the Americans are building a military base in a foreign country.
                1. vickul
                  vickul 23 January 2016 19: 25
                  +2
                  An interesting question! Probably the UN.
              3. kil 31
                kil 31 23 January 2016 15: 35
                +6
                Quote: Lalaika
                And all the shobla (NATO) will rush to tear Assad under a legitimate pretext, including Israel

                They already said 21.01.16/XNUMX/XNUMX
                If the Minister of Defense of Israel Moshe Yaalon had to choose between Iran and the terrorist group “Islamic State” (ISIS, ISIS), he would choose the latter. The minister said this at a conference at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) in Tel Aviv, reports The Washington Post.
                These are the fighters against terrorism. For God's chosen ISIS, a God's chosen organization.
                1. kil 31
                  kil 31 23 January 2016 17: 40
                  +2
                  Who is minus the God-chosen? First, learn to close your defense minister’s mouth, and then be offended.
            2. remy
              remy 23 January 2016 14: 27
              +7
              SAR OTRK "Tochka-U" doesn’t suck ...
              half tons of explosives equivalent to TNT 3,5 tons + submunitions - "FAIRY TALE"
          2. BaLaLaykin
            BaLaLaykin 23 January 2016 13: 23
            +2
            Militarily, it’s complicated, there’s not enough strength. Only from the UN rostrum, and that’s not the fact that it will be effective
        2. DobryAAH
          DobryAAH 23 January 2016 13: 43
          +4
          And not just climbed, but in emergency mode. Interestingly, they were made to so fuss so abruptly.

          This is it, it seems. They want to have time to chop off a piece under Kurdistan and pick up oil tanks from Syria.
          The sneaky plan to create Kurdistan
          http://www.voltairenet.org/article189567.html
        3. shtanko.49
          shtanko.49 23 January 2016 15: 22
          +2
          They have to get in before the divide, cunningly .. jackals.
        4. Lelek
          Lelek 23 January 2016 19: 36
          +1
          Quote: keel 31
          And not just climbed, but in emergency mode. Interestingly, they were made to so fuss so abruptly.


          And at the same time, some strange stuffing from London went. The Anglo-Saxons are up to something, some other trickster
          (cry.)
        5. 30BIS
          30BIS 23 January 2016 19: 51
          +2
          The Syrians went to the border with Turkey ... Of course, with the support of our VKS ..! As always, to the pie section, the smell of fried and what would not be possible to completely solve the problem of the border with Turkey, the jackals get stuck in a flock. That's just a flock of very s.ka! big .. I hope our Akela does not miss !! Akela knows what to do !!
        6. Vladimir 23rus
          Vladimir 23rus 23 January 2016 22: 17
          +2
          The same as during the Second World War. Adhere to the victory and SHARE (assign) its fruits.
      2. avt
        avt 23 January 2016 12: 46
        +9
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, all climbed bastards ...

        Mosul is squeezed from the Shiite government of Iraq under the Turks, or ISIS, or the Borzanist Kurdistan. Well, how the chip will fall.
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        What are our silent ???

        Let's hope that in Kamyshly, on the already-completed strip and a real air base under the control of the PKK, there will be a jump airfield with at least turntables to begin with. And the PKK, as Semyon Baghdasarov constantly says, will be most important among the barzanists and as evidenced by the last shots from Diarbakir, where the Turks they set up tanks in the city; campaigning in the field is no longer very fun for them.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 23 January 2016 12: 59
          +4
          Quote: avt
          And the PKK, as Semyon Baghdasarov constantly says, according to the most important barzanists, will be and what the latest shots from Diarbakir show, where the Turks place tanks in the city, their campaign in the field is no longer very funny.

          .. absolutely right .. hi .. and the Syrian Kurds are more inclined towards the Turkish than the Iraqi .. the mattress project on Kurdistan for the collapse of Syria and Iraq and oil control in this area creaks .. the Syrian Kurds have already received a lesson from Pope Assad, for participating in the coup on his overthrow .. and they didn’t give up Kurdistan .. already wrote .. hi
          1. avt
            avt 23 January 2016 13: 54
            +4
            Quote: Inok10
            . and Syrian Kurds are more inclined to Turkish than to Iraqi ..

            Let's put it a little differently - as the Ajalanites and the Borzanists were at enmity with each other, that's all that remained - “Javdet is a coward, Abdula is a warrior, they do not love each other.” The Turks and the US threw them up very well in the previous Turn of the Game, when the Borzani family rose on a joint oil trade with Erdogan's family.But now the Turks in the southeast are clearly straining, not yet straining, but in fact the Civil War has already begun and it just won't end, and different Armenians, Zazes, and other religious minorities will easily catch up there So for a minute, the Europeans are ALREADY planning four million refugees / displaced persons in two or three years. And taking into account the ALREADY existing Turkish and Kurdish diaspora in Europe, the territory of Bulgaria freed from the Bulgarians ... Well, funny times are coming.
      3. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 23 January 2016 12: 47
        21
        Here are the Gundos! Proven Saxon arrogance to open a "second front", so God forbid not to be late for distribution. And it doesn't matter whether they ask them or not, nothing changes, but it's a pity, it's time to accustom the Yankes to an unknown word for them - BREAK! am
      4. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 23 January 2016 12: 58
        +3
        "The new infrastructure will allow the United States to create an air bridge to supply the Syrian Democratic Army in the fight against the IS group."
        - They just need to shove the claw, and then erase the xren!
        1. vyinemeynen
          vyinemeynen 23 January 2016 13: 14
          0
          they will cut their nails there right on the shoulders! soldier
          1. BaLaLaykin
            BaLaLaykin 23 January 2016 13: 25
            +1
            Who? SAA can’t, IG willn’t, the Turks have nowhere to go
      5. alone
        alone 23 January 2016 14: 14
        +2
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, all climbed bastards ... They think the ruble fell, oil, too .. RUSSIA KNEELED? Heh heh .. What a blunder!


        the error is not an error, but the fact is obvious. It was not without reason that I said that sooner or later the coalition will enter the ground there. Without large ground forces it is impossible to defeat the Terras. It is impossible to fundamentally change the situation with one bombing
        1. ochakow703
          ochakow703 24 January 2016 06: 25
          0
          Yeah, the Americans go there by ground forces in order to fight IS? Do not tell my slippers. They climb there so that, in the wake of the fight against IS, they will gain a foothold in this extremely important region, in order to pit everyone with everyone, and, of course, in order to suppress Assad. I wonder why Assad is silent? He did not give consent to the placement of amers on his territory? Or did the dog rummage elsewhere?
    2. Yak28
      Yak28 23 January 2016 12: 43
      +8
      They don’t give a damn about permission, the strong one won’t ask permission from the weak.
      1. activator
        activator 23 January 2016 12: 54
        +4
        Quote: Yak28
        Now remember this place on the map of Syria, this territory of Syria will no longer belong

        Most likely, yes, they will share Syria, they will put in power whoever needs to be and Assad will impose sanctions so that he won’t be able to pickle and there will be something similar to North and South Korea and what can Russia do for Assad in this case? Probably nothing in the territory of Assad will be devastated by hunger and cold and Americans will tell which Assad a tyrant does not normally live for people.
        1. activator
          activator 23 January 2016 13: 22
          +1
          I understand that minusers believe that this option can not be? or will Russia have funds to restore the Syrian infrastructure, especially since there will be no oil or is North Korea a paradise on earth?
          1. nrex
            nrex 23 January 2016 13: 33
            +1
            This is someone you bother)))
          2. Ezhaak
            Ezhaak 23 January 2016 15: 38
            +3
            Quote: activator
            minusers believe that this option cannot be

            This minus packs raise their heads! They believe that only their opinion has the right to life.
          3. Bayonet
            Bayonet 23 January 2016 15: 53
            +1
            Quote: activator
            Or is North Korea a paradise on earth?

            For some woodpeckers, yes! True prefer to live in Russia smile
    3. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 23 January 2016 12: 44
      19
      Quote: yuriy55
      1. Check with Assad if he gave permission.
      2. Level with the landscape ...
      am

      1. I didn’t, the Syrians said that the introduction of the American contingent would be considered an act of aggression by the United States. Otherwise, as preparation for this, reconstruction of the air base is impossible to regard.
      2. To whom to level? Ours definitely will not, because an armed conflict with the United States is least needed right now. If only the Syrian Air Force will try, they are in their own right and in their own land.
      1. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 23 January 2016 13: 39
        11
        A certain detachment of unknown (terrorist) forces is attacking an American base. By destroying the hapless American runway builders. Immediately after this, a plane (several) of the Russian Aerospace Forces appears, and demonstratively punishes the terrorists who offended our "partners". Punishes harshly, incl. and BETABs, no matter what, there is no more. As a result: no amers, no terrorists, no witnesses, no band. Everything, the question is closed.
        That's somehow it is necessary to work, I think, what is the influence of our special services there now? Find a detachment of scumbags which do not mind?
        1. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 23 January 2016 14: 02
          -2
          Gentlemen minusers, since you are minuscule, do not consider it difficult to explain. Or will you have to enter into a discussion, and this is not how, can’t ..?
          1. BaLaLaykin
            BaLaLaykin 23 January 2016 14: 43
            0
            Sometimes it’s better to let them down, than to unsubscribe from those arguments. Moreover, trying to convince them is a waste of time and effort laughing
          2. Bayonet
            Bayonet 23 January 2016 16: 06
            +6
            Quote: Observer 33
            Gentlemen minusers, since you are minuscule, do not consider it difficult to explain. Or you have to enter into a discussion,

            I did not set a minus, but I will express my opinion. If the guys from
            CIA or MI6, it would be "vile Anglo-Saxons", and if Observer 33 suggests, that's what you need! Yes?smile
            1. 33 Watcher
              33 Watcher 23 January 2016 17: 06
              -3
              No. It's just that "clean hands" are from MOVIES about scouts. And if you engage in cleanliness, prepare for defeat. I am not forcing you to do this, but I would do just that. But for some reason, in the event of a victory, the slickers will applaud, without thinking about the methods of waging war. Don't know why?
          3. igorka357
            igorka357 25 January 2016 06: 35
            0
            The minus didn’t sculpt, but I will take the liberty of answering the minusers .. they’re afraid to enter into a discussion with you, you are planning strategic operations, and are probably smarter than the people from the general staff, so they minus the hole wink !!!
        2. alone
          alone 23 January 2016 15: 12
          +3
          Quote: Observer 33
          A detachment of unknown (terrorist) forces is attacking an American base. Destroying the unfortunate American runway builders.


          Do you think that the Americans are so stupid that they left their people there without any cover and any detachment can simply enter, destroy and leave. It's only Zadornov's “they are tough.” Put together a squad and go to destroy them. Believe me, you will not get closer to 50 km. you can.
          1. MIKHAN
            MIKHAN 23 January 2016 16: 31
            +1
            Quote: lonely
            Quote: Observer 33
            A detachment of unknown (terrorist) forces is attacking an American base. Destroying the unfortunate American runway builders.


            Do you think that the Americans are so stupid that they left their people there without any cover and any detachment can simply enter, destroy and leave. It's only Zadornov's “they are tough.” Put together a squad and go to destroy them. Believe me, you will not get closer to 50 km. you can.

            Omar can stop teaching Russia? Did you seem to be promising to deal with Armenia over Karabakh? We’ve been waiting for 3 years already ... And they even put the latest weapons for you ..! Aliyev a nonsense means? laughing wink
            1. alone
              alone 23 January 2016 17: 45
              +2
              Quote: MIKHAN
              Omar can stop teaching Russia? Did you seem to be promising to deal with Armenia over Karabakh? We’ve been waiting for 3 years already ... And they even put the latest weapons for you ..! Aliyev a nonsense means?

              And what about Vitaly Karabakh? Are we discussing Karabakh? A man proposes to destroy an American detachment of builders in a deep rear. I’m trying to explain to him that this is impossible. Because the Americans are not stupid. There’s everything under control. And since when Forum Observer 33 is Russia ?

              P.S. I'm tired of teaching you Vitaly. Gorlopanstvom does not solve anything. If you want to do something with a machine gun in your hands and march forward, the pipe calls. Shouting here "Let's destroy, we will fly to Mars" is easy. All this is done in order to earn a rating. But in reality, maybe you are a liberal wassat
          2. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher 23 January 2016 17: 10
            0
            I do not think anything. To think it is necessary to have data on the composition of the military guard. And relying on them to prepare the operation. Just work and everything will work out. But Americans are not afraid of anything that you can’t go to the forest at all.


            1. alone
              alone 23 January 2016 17: 46
              0
              Quote: Observer 33
              I do not think anything. To think it is necessary to have data on the composition of the military guard.

              This is already a base, not a guard. The fact is clear. There they will first be put in military transport, and then also combat.
              1. 33 Watcher
                33 Watcher 23 January 2016 18: 26
                0
                - "Omar may be enough to teach Russia?"
                - "And since when is Forum Observer 33 Russia?"

                Can you teach me? Maybe for starters it’s worth confirming the qualification ..?
                1. alone
                  alone 23 January 2016 19: 13
                  +2
                  Quote: Observer 33
                  Can you teach me? Maybe for starters it’s worth confirming the qualification ..?

                  Learning is never a sin. It may be that I understand some things better than you, and some you understand better than I. And in order to check my qualifications, you must first confirm yourselves. But your hypothesis about a certain detachment showed that, in such matters, your qualifications are lame))) And if you can teach what you know
                  better than me would be glad hi
        3. clidon
          clidon 23 January 2016 22: 00
          0
          In order to do this, oil should cost us a hundred per barrel. Or should we be a country with a GDP of more than 10 trillion dollars.
          And so these are all wonderful fantasies on the topic "How can we get deeper bogged down in the B. East" And with full confidence that no one will guess the nature of terrorists. And no other "terrorist" organization will think of giving us any answer. Well, this is in addition to the fact that first you need to be sure that the American "construction" forces are not covered by anyone or anything ...
      2. tolian
        tolian 23 January 2016 17: 44
        -2
        The strip will be destroyed. Soon. Or captured by the example of Pristina.
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 23 January 2016 18: 35
          +2
          Quote: tolian
          Or captured by the example of Pristina

          By whom? She is already in the hands of someone else, these people seem to be building there. And the strip in Pristina was taken without a single shot. Then you have to sweat and shoot in your case.
        2. clidon
          clidon 23 January 2016 22: 02
          0
          In order to be captured following the example of Pristina, there should not be anyone on it except friendly people.
    4. NIKNN
      NIKNN 23 January 2016 12: 45
      +7
      Quote: yuriy55
      1. Check with Assad if he gave permission.
      2. Level with the landscape ...
      am

      3. In a pinch, allow the aircraft carrier to be placed in this place (aircraft carrier territory of the United States) laughing
    5. vlad66
      vlad66 23 January 2016 12: 47
      23
      Quote: yuriy55
      1. Check with Assad if he gave permission.

      He didn’t. The Syrian Foreign Ministry said that such actions would be regarded as aggression against the ATS. hi
      Quote: yuriy55
      2. Level with the landscape ...

      I wish this very much, where the mattresses were visited only by blood, blood and blood flowing like water.
      "It may also indicate US plans for new actions against the IS."

      Mattresses want to take control of the Turkish border in order to continue their dark affairs with the Turks and barmaley-stolen oil. Weapons, drugs, slave trade. hi
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 23 January 2016 13: 23
        +2
        The appearance without the sanction of Damascus, the US military in Syria, which was mentioned by the head of the Pentagon Ashton Carter, will be regarded as aggression. This, according to Interfax, said the ambassador of Syria to Russia, Riad Haddad.
        “Any interference in the affairs of Syria without the consent of the official government is considered aggression against the Syrian people”- said the diplomat.https://lenta.ru/news/2016/01/23/syria/
    6. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 23 January 2016 13: 14
      +9
      "The BBC editors, in turn, add that the increase in bandwidth may indicate new actions planned by the US against ISIS."

      Or about large-scale assistance to any military groups fighting against the legitimate government of Syria. By the way, does Assad have no desire to build an airfield somewhere in California? But what about Obama’s opinion at that?
    7. castle
      castle 23 January 2016 15: 04
      +1
      It will also be necessary to “level the Kurds with the landscape,” as they consider that territory their own and have long sought and are seeking autonomy from the Assads. Kurds, too, are fighting against ISIS (Daesh), but Assad, how can I put it more delicately ?, do not really consider their friend, and Erdogan is not their friend. The Kurds were hit. Russia is there too with them, not always "like garlic."
  2. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 23 January 2016 12: 38
    +5
    Maybe they’ll build an airfield in Siberia ??? What are our silent ???
    1. There are a lot of us
      There are a lot of us 23 January 2016 12: 48
      +4
      It seems that this issue was agreed upon between Lavrov and Kerry ... sad
      1. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 23 January 2016 13: 24
        +1
        Quote: There are many of us
        It seems that this issue was agreed upon at the talks between Lavrov and Kerry.

        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        Maybe they’ll build an airfield in Siberia ??? What are our silent ???

        Syrian ambassador warns US against ground operation in Raqqa
        http://www.interfax.ru/world/491084
        Moscow. January 22. INTERFAX.RU - Interference in Syrian affairs, including military, without the sanction of official Damascus is regarded as aggression, the Syrian ambassador to Russia in Riad Haddad told Interfax.

        "Any interference in the affairs of Syria without the consent of the official government is considered aggression against the Syrian people," the Syrian ambassador said, commenting at the request of the agency on the statement by the head of the Pentagon, Ashton Carter, that operations to free the main strongholds of terrorists from IS (banned in the Russian Federation) are Syrian Raqqa and Iraqi Mosul - should be carried out with the participation of ground forces.
      2. Hagalaz
        Hagalaz 23 January 2016 13: 32
        -1
        Quote: There are a lot of us
        It seems that this issue was agreed upon between Lavrov and Kerry ... sad

        I think yes. And the partition of Syria is very likely. The question is, who can chop off how much.
    2. nrex
      nrex 23 January 2016 13: 35
      0
      In Kyrgyzstan, there was
  3. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 23 January 2016 12: 38
    +7
    Pin.os want to arrange a full-fledged war between the troops of Assad and their "democratic" broads.
    1. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 23 January 2016 12: 41
      +9
      The first stone in the foundation of the "third world" is being laid.
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 23 January 2016 13: 15
        +3
        Quote: Red_Hamer
        The first stone in the foundation of the "third world" is being laid.
        - Americans again want to disrupt carte blanche. ISIS is squeezing the lid, and here is not only Russia when distributing, but also our "friends", overseas with their Wishlist, like: "We plowed!"
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 23 January 2016 15: 45
          +2
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          overseas with their Wishlist, like: "We plowed!"

          And on this subject there is a caricature, very fresh.
      2. Charik
        Charik 23 January 2016 13: 36
        0
        not the first one has already lined the wall for a long time
  4. Fregate
    Fregate 23 January 2016 12: 39
    +4
    Provisioning for Daesh is organized.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 23 January 2016 12: 45
      +1
      Quote: Fregate
      Provisioning for Daesh is organized.

      Yeah, and when supplies were dropped with parachutes, they not only got the IS, and sometimes those who were fighting the IS. smile
    2. nrex
      nrex 23 January 2016 13: 37
      0
      No, this is a card of moderate opposition.
  5. Appraiser
    Appraiser 23 January 2016 12: 41
    +3
    These actions must be regarded as a military invasion and declaration of war on Syria. It’s strange how, why is the UN Security Council silent? soldier
    1. Yak28
      Yak28 23 January 2016 12: 45
      +6
      The UN has not been working for 20 years, like the League of Nations in its time. Whoever rules the strongest, now such rules on the world stage wink
    2. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 23 January 2016 12: 46
      0
      And where is the UN Security Council located ?? I’m in the United States, therefore, it is silent.
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 23 January 2016 13: 07
      +3
      Well, there’s a Turkish base in Iraq, Iraq has ceased to even bay for the sake of decency, and at first it threatened to bomb, but Erdogan only expanded the base and introduced additional forces.
      1. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 23 January 2016 13: 44
        0
        Ah, there’s no old Saddam on them ... crying
  6. 31rus
    31rus 23 January 2016 12: 42
    +3
    Dear, here's the answer to why you need negotiations in Geneva, to justify the invasion of Syria, everything else extras and cover
  7. Voha_krim
    Voha_krim 23 January 2016 12: 44
    +5
    Question: but why, excuse me ... are the Yankees allowed to enter the territory of a sovereign state? At the request of the Syrian government or personally by President Bashar al-Assad? There was no such thing. With the sanction of the UN Security Council, perhaps? And nothing like that here. How to understand all this? Washington again decided to shake the old days and, as in “better times”, to show, “who is the boss in the house” ?!
    However, the opposite is also possible: are the Americans rushing to help their fundamentalist proteges? But all for the same reason: the jihadists began to specifically bake ...
    1. Glory_box
      Glory_box 23 January 2016 12: 51
      +4
      For them, the law has not been written (they think so), but I think it will not last long yet. Everyone is already tired of this.
    2. BaLaLaykin
      BaLaLaykin 23 January 2016 13: 30
      +1
      Americans have said a hundred times that they do not consider Assad a legitimate president and they do not need his permission, it's time to declare Parashunko illegal, and terrorist terrorists
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. nrex
      nrex 23 January 2016 13: 40
      +1
      You react in vain, terrorists are the general definition of all reactionary radicals, Daesh is the specific name of terrorists in a certain area of ​​the Earth. )))
  9. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 23 January 2016 12: 52
    +5
    It is necessary for the Syrians in that area to establish a no-fly zone for the United States — they are in their own right, and simply must wet the American reptile!
    1. Sibbars
      Sibbars 23 January 2016 13: 31
      0
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      It is necessary for the Syrians in that area to establish a no-fly zone for the United States — they are in their own right, and simply must wet the American reptile!

      To ask Assad how he would feel about this news, if it’s negative, launch a couple of three warheads, and then we are not apologetic.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. Yak28
    Yak28 23 January 2016 13: 02
    +4
    I think the result of the Syrian company is that Assad and his family will come to Moscow, and the new pro-American leadership of Syria will ask the Russian troops to get out of Syria. Then our sworn American friends will take up Iran. Now, bright minds in the General Staff must rack their brains to Did not happen.
  11. maxxdesign
    maxxdesign 23 January 2016 13: 05
    +4
    We have already seen this!

    On June 6, 1944, American, British and Canadian forces under the command of General Eisenhower began a landing in Normandy (Northern France). This is commonly referred to as "opening a second front in Europe."


    scum busters again! as soon as Russia begins to win, so these scavengers are right there .. and then they scream that they won all of them and they are such heroes!
  12. naGua
    naGua 23 January 2016 13: 07
    +3
    I put a minus, because I really, really don't like all this fuss! We are waiting for the next big nasty things from the "free world"!
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 23 January 2016 13: 15
      +1
      Quote: naGua
      I put a minus, because I really, really don't like all this fuss! We are waiting for the next big nasty things from the "free world"!

      I totally agree with you! We look forward to ... We are getting stronger!
    2. nrex
      nrex 23 January 2016 13: 43
      0
      Comrad then here? He expressed one of the scenarios, he does not attack anyone. You are not right.
  13. SSLL
    SSLL 23 January 2016 13: 10
    +1
    Are they going to fight ISIS !! ?? And anyway, what are they doing in a foreign country without the consent of a legitimate government ???
  14. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 23 January 2016 13: 12
    +2
    Prepare for transport workers. There will be supplies "direct" in this place. Parachute emissions all go to the wrong place. Therefore, they are preparing a podliany for the Syrian government. Explicit order. Some kind of opposition to feed in the vicinity. And I think, let it be. A good streak and Assad will come in handy. Russia will not allow Syria to be torn apart in "territory."
  15. potalevl
    potalevl 23 January 2016 13: 32
    -1
    Mattresses will not climb into Syria. They were made clear that without permission from Syria and Russia, nothing shines on them. I think about it Lavrov and Kerry said. In Iraq, mattresses dominate, and therefore send their paratroopers there to prevent Russians from entering Iraq, as well as to spoil the Syrians from Iraq. The situation on the Syrian theater is such that Assad’s troops take control of the Syrian-Turkish border, and therefore the Turks will not be able to support the ISIS bandits. Then these bandits will come to an end, and the mattresses do not need it yet. In addition, I think the mattresses want to show in Iraq that they are the main force that can end ISIS. Therefore, most likely, they will negotiate with the bandits in Iraq on the cessation of hostilities. Something like this.
    1. alone
      alone 23 January 2016 14: 16
      +1
      Quote: potalevl
      Mattresses will not climb into Syria

      They are already equipping the bridgehead there, but you say they won’t climb. And the special forces there are fully operational.
      1. castle
        castle 23 January 2016 18: 46
        +1
        Let's try to put out the emotions! We will wait a week, until 30.01 - 08.02. 2016. Something will be seen there, or rather, information will appear. And the reaction of the Kurds to the appearance of fighters of the US 101st Airborne Division in Kurdistan, and the arrangement of the airfields of El-Kamyshly (taken by Russia) and Rmeilan (taken by the United States). And Libya and Fiji. Wait, see. And do not bark prematurely.
      2. potalevl
        potalevl 23 January 2016 20: 51
        0
        Nu-nu! Where did you see the equipped bridgehead and successful operations of the special forces of the mattress in Syria? Indicate this bridgehead and name at least one successful operation carried out from this bridgehead, you respected our strategic analyst. Or do you think that the 50 mattresses guarded by the Barzani renegade Kurds, sold to the Turks, decide anything on the Syrian theater? Learn materiel, you are our unrecognized marshal. I have the honor.
  16. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 January 2016 13: 36
    +2
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    And I think, let it be. A good streak and Assad will come in handy. Russia will not allow Syria to be torn apart in "territory."

    Will not give! That Turkish fighter would bring down ... Do not fly Basurman! (start buttons have already been erased, from impatience ..))))
    1. BaLaLaykin
      BaLaLaykin 23 January 2016 13: 38
      0
      the information about the downed helicopters was painfully cloudy, in the course of the play ours planted them, otherwise why was the Nuland urgently flying to Russia and screaming about the war?
  17. nrex
    nrex 23 January 2016 13: 49
    +1
    Gentlemen, the true intentions of the United States in Syria have already been voiced here. This is the development of the front of the Syrian moderate opposition against ISIS, but this is only the beginning, then there will be a feint with the ears and, as in that saying "three, four turns and a goat ... Fedota." Russia's silence on this issue should be regarded as a concession at the Surkov-Nuland meeting and, accordingly, a change in rhetoric on the possible lifting of sanctions.
  18. vobels
    vobels 23 January 2016 13: 53
    +1
    And the runway and the entire infrastructure is still useful for Syria. So do not rush to bomb.
  19. midashko
    midashko 23 January 2016 14: 18
    0
    It’s impossible to bomb. This is America, not ISIS. But I hope that when Assad arrives there, he will, firstly, turn to the UN with a request to remove the base, and secondly, put up a couple of dozen tanks on the runway, which will take off from the 20 meters line for takeoff, and then return again . Let everyone out and not let anyone in. And how long will the arrogant Saxons survive there? Well, if not Assad, then the Kurds will subscribe ...
    They climb, they opened a second front, although Syria did not ask them about it, they want to catch the divide of production and influence in the region.
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 23 January 2016 16: 05
      +1
      Only Assad 500 kilometers with battles breaks to this base at least, not to mention that during this action it will be constantly erroneously bombed with ever-increasing force.
  20. sabakina
    sabakina 23 January 2016 15: 43
    +1
    “Prince, are you ready?”
    - Yes! I am announcing an ultimatum!
    - And I come in from behind!
    (c) From the film "Formula of Love".
  21. kg pv
    kg pv 23 January 2016 17: 00
    0
    Poor Syria is being pulled, and nobody will do anything to mattresses.
    1. kg pv
      kg pv 23 January 2016 17: 38
      0
      Before setting a minus, give an example of who and where made mattresses to leave. (it’s not necessary for Vietnam, it was a long time ago) Better yet, give an example of when and who didn’t just force them to leave but did it so to speak by force, that is, give them a slope so that they would run in horror.
  22. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 23 January 2016 17: 17
    +1
    Biden stated his readiness to resolve the Syrian issue by military means.
    http://www.kp.ru/online/news/2285495/
  23. Just BB
    Just BB 23 January 2016 18: 36
    0
    Baba Vanga: "Damascus will fall, but the victory will go to the wrong one ..."
    The phrase was voiced on TV before the start of the Russian air operation.
    Well, how could such words have been said - - now there is no doubt: the rights of a granny.
    Нado there was "naspor" - when he was outraged by Peskov's statement about the impossibility of a ground operation and this will be just used by the Merikos
  24. vickul
    vickul 23 January 2016 19: 28
    0
    Why do I have an enemy flag? Who will answer for this?
  25. alexmarkov
    alexmarkov 24 January 2016 01: 05
    0
    Stratfor always gives good analytics. I myself often use their information for my blog .. By the way, if someone is interested in their original subscription - www.stratfor24.ru - it can help.
  26. Conscience
    Conscience 24 January 2016 01: 50
    0
    and if government troops take off and land a couple of VKS helicopters, how will the Americans behave?