Military Review

Media: American UAV shot down in Yemen by a Soviet rocket

120
In the network there was a video of the destruction of the American drone Yemeni Hussites, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta.


Media: American UAV shot down in Yemen by a Soviet rocket


“It is assumed that the unit was destroyed on January 20 in the sky over the capital of Yemen, Sanah. The video contains the moment of launch of the rocket with Hussites from the C-75 Dvina anti-aircraft missile system and the shooting of the UAV debris located on the ground, ”the publication comments.

The newspaper reminds that the “Dvina” C-75 air defense system was adopted in the USSR in 1957 year, was supplied to more than four dozen countries and in many of them it is still in service ”.



Recently, the Washington Post reported that "in 2015, the US lost a total of 24 heavy UAVs in Afghanistan, in the Horn of Africa, in Iraq in Libya, Kuwait, Turkey, Syria, and, presumably, in Mali and Yemen."
Photos used:
Gerald L Nino / US Air Force
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. GRAY
    GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 07
    75
    The Americans call it "failed landing" and "operator error".
    1. Sasha 19871987
      Sasha 19871987 22 January 2016 12: 08
      132
      The genius of Soviet engineers inspires respect !!! the modern newfangled American colossus is shot down by a rocket of a complex of more than half a century of development ... glory to the Russian genius !!!
      1. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 22 January 2016 12: 14
        47
        Pralna, the Yemeni air defense motto is: We don't fly ourselves, and we don't give amerikosy! Get out, "exceptional"! am
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 48
          +3
          Quote: Major Yurik
          Pralna, the Yemeni air defense motto is: We don't fly ourselves, and we don't give amerikosy! Get out, "exceptional"!

          Litak Saudi, most likely, was.
          1. djqnbdjqnb
            djqnbdjqnb 22 January 2016 13: 23
            23
            If I am not mistaken, such a Powers rocket was shot down?
            1. raf
              raf 22 January 2016 19: 04
              17
              Quote: djqnbdjqnb
              If I am not mistaken, such a Powers rocket was shot down?

              Her beloved! It was the case served at such a complex! It only surprised me that they shot one missile, usually they shoot three, or at least two. Can missiles be in short supply ?!
              1. Yuri from Volgograd
                Yuri from Volgograd 22 January 2016 21: 01
                44
                Promotion from Shoigu -
                Collect pieces of the remains of an enemy UAV in pieces, send to Russia and get a set of new missiles for free!
                Note: The promotion is limited by the number of vehicles of the United States and its allies. Hurry to be in time!
              2. 1rl141
                1rl141 23 January 2016 01: 17
                15
                Quote: raf
                Quote: djqnbdjqnb
                If I am not mistaken, such a Powers rocket was shot down?

                Her beloved! It was the case served at such a complex! It only surprised me that they shot one missile, usually they shoot three, or at least two. Can missiles be in short supply ?!


                The probability of hitting the S-75 with one missile is 0,8, and the two are 0,95.
                If the target is not fast and does not maneuver like a louse on a scallop, then just one missile is enough, which has been practically proved.
              3. Romanenko
                Romanenko 25 January 2016 10: 05
                0
                Probably, how many of them did not, once they should end)))))
                So now they save.
                According to modern technologies, five Bukov missiles would be made of materials for one Dvina now, and nothing else could be said about the others. So most likely they are not being made anywhere else - they are being shot from warehouses.
          2. vladimirw
            vladimirw 25 January 2016 10: 17
            0
            And no difference, they shot down and good
      2. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 22 January 2016 12: 16
        +7
        American UAV shot down in Yemen by a Soviet missile!
        “So tremble the Yankees!” RUSSIAN modern rockets cooler!
        1. kil 31
          kil 31 22 January 2016 12: 21
          21
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          American UAV shot down in Yemen by a Soviet missile!
          “So tremble the Yankees!” RUSSIAN modern rockets cooler!

          And not only modern rockets. It is a pity that heavy drones do not fly on ukraine. Would like to watch. Well, there’s nothing to put the Hussites with new equipment, they will give us.
          The history of the disappearance of new Western equipment from the Ukrainian army without a trace is long and sad. Or maybe it's funny - it's like someone. But in any case, it continues. Now drones too! The situation was succinctly described by the member of the US House of Representatives Duncan Hunter. Having visited Ukraine on a study tour, the California Republican told his congressional colleagues the following: "Joking aside, the Russians do not shoot down Ukrainian drones - they take them for themselves. They take them to Russian territory, where they land." The words of the congressman are quoted by the Washington Times.
          1. Vladimir 23rus
            Vladimir 23rus 22 January 2016 13: 09
            +4
            It is a pity that heavy drones do not fly on ukraine
            Of course, we no longer have the "omnipotent" KGB, but I think we have already "raped" more than one American drone hi
          2. russmensch
            russmensch 22 January 2016 13: 26
            13
            Yes, their whole brood has already landed. The Amer general complained that they suddenly flew to Russia on their own, as ours changed their program in flight.
            1. iliitchitch
              iliitchitch 24 January 2016 21: 57
              +2
              Quote: russmensch
              Yes, their whole brood has already landed. The Amer general complained that they suddenly flew to Russia on their own, as ours changed their program in flight.


              Where the truth is, they fly there.
        2. niki233
          niki233 22 January 2016 18: 28
          +4
          this is our peaceful tractor flying! laughing
      3. Mahmut
        Mahmut 22 January 2016 12: 18
        13
        Although this complex is antediluvian, but not every shepherd knows how to manage it. And in terms of the height of the targets hit, it will not yield to the most modern air defense systems.
        1. SAM 5
          SAM 5 22 January 2016 12: 31
          +8
          And in Yugoslavia, what brought down the F-117? S-75!
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 55
            15
            Quote: SAM 5
            And in Yugoslavia, what brought down the F-117? S-75!

            S-125 was there, sort of.
            http://www.srpska.ru/article.php?nid=28331
            1. SAM 5
              SAM 5 22 January 2016 13: 05
              +2
              Really 125, but before infa was that 75th.
              1. samoletil18
                samoletil18 22 January 2016 17: 29
                +4
                Iraqis shot down the 75th tornado in 1991.
      4. AlexTires
        AlexTires 22 January 2016 12: 18
        29
        From the SAM that was put into service in the distant 1957, there was almost nothing left, even the KUNGs in which the equipment was located, it seems to me, are different. And missiles have long been gone. The question (rhetorical) is different: what kind of he.r.r.n.ya. such that someone allows himself to violate the borders of countries, and never such cases are the subject of proceedings at the UN ...
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 22 January 2016 13: 27
          +7
          Quote: AlexTires
          even the KUNGs in which the equipment is located, it seems to me, are different.

          Agree that from the form of KUNG itself the ability to destroy a target does not change. Regarding the equipment, of course, much has changed constructively over 60 years. Because the elemental base changes without asking designers.
          Quote: AlexTires
          such cases are never the subject of litigation at the UN

          For a long time, the UN tried to open its mouth and slammed its mitt. Like, shut up dear, otherwise I will stop paying my fees and make you pay for renting land and buildings! Since then, the UN has stuck its tongue into the anus itself.
      5. gray smeet
        gray smeet 22 January 2016 12: 30
        22
        Unpleasant news for our pilots fighting in Syria: in the area of ​​the Deir Ez-Zor airbase, the militants of the “Islamic State” * captured the fighting positions of a part of the Syrian army’s air defense. What exactly and in what quantity fell into the hands of thugs is unknown. But judging by the images that the bandits posted on the Web, they now have at least one 2P25 combat vehicle, a self-propelled reconnaissance and guidance unit (SURN 1C91) and several 3M9 anti-aircraft missiles. All these are the main components of the Kvadrat air defense mobile complex, the export variation that became notorious after the Donbass summer of 2014, “Cuba”. What is missing is the target designation reception booth (KPTs 9S417).
        Naturally, from photographs it is difficult to judge in what condition the weapon is. Outwardly, neither cars nor rockets showed any damage. What is inside - only Allah knows. However, in war, commanders simply must foresee the worst case scenario. That is, in this case - that the “Square” captured in Deir Ez-Zor is serviceable and ready for battle.
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 22 January 2016 13: 01
          -1
          Here is the link: http://ren.tv/novosti/2016-01-22/terroristy-igil-opublikovali-foto-zahvachennogo
          -rossiyskogo-zrk-kvadrat? fuf
        2. Mountain shooter
          Mountain shooter 22 January 2016 13: 03
          +9
          And they prepared the operators and mastered the maintenance? And will this complex be moved along the roads? The cube is not MANPADS, you can’t take it in a jeep and you will not shoot offhand. They seized planes at airfields, threatened to bomb the Kremlin.
          1. aleks26
            aleks26 22 January 2016 13: 54
            +5
            Ukrainians will catch up, they will become
          2. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 22 January 2016 15: 29
            +6
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            And they prepared the operators and mastered the maintenance?

            The Islamists have specialists. Many officers of Saddam's army dispersed by the Americans are fighting on their side.
            1. samoletil18
              samoletil18 22 January 2016 17: 32
              +2
              They, like Square did not deliver.
        3. Mera joota
          Mera joota 22 January 2016 13: 13
          +2
          Quote: gray smeet
          Bad news for our pilots fighting in Syria:

          Yes, there was one trash, the video shows nothing serious to use ....
        4. SAM 5
          SAM 5 22 January 2016 13: 28
          +6
          export variations that became notorious after the Donbass summer of 2014 "Cuba"

          What the fuck "Cuba", "Buk". The hell with two they will use it, especially without target designation, and they have no prepared calculations.
        5. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 22 January 2016 13: 29
          +6
          Quote: gray smeet
          Bad news for our pilots fighting in Syria

          So, either beat off or destroy. One out of two.
        6. Ze Kot
          Ze Kot 22 January 2016 14: 46
          +2
          Quote: gray smeet
          All these are the main components of the Kvadrat air defense mobile complex, the export variation that became notorious after the Donbass summer of 2014, “Cuba”



          The Buk was there.
        7. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 22 January 2016 15: 27
          +4
          Quote: gray smeet
          Unpleasant news for our pilots fighting in Syria: in the area of ​​the Deir Ez-Zor airbase, the militants of the “Islamic State” * captured the fighting positions of a part of the Syrian army’s air defense. What exactly and in what quantity fell into the hands of thugs is unknown. But judging by the images that the bandits posted on the Web, they now have at least one 2P25 combat vehicle, a self-propelled reconnaissance and guidance unit (SURN 1C91) and several 3M9 anti-aircraft missiles. All these are the main components of the Kvadrat air defense mobile complex, the export variation that became notorious after the Donbass summer of 2014, “Cuba”. What is missing is the target designation reception booth (KPTs 9S417).

          At bmpd and Denis Mokrushin, this topic has already been discussed.
          In the comments, they quickly recalled the fate of the serviceable Osa air defense systems captured by the militants. For them, the militants had both crews and missiles. But with this air defense system, shoot down only 2 Syrian helicopters - after which the "wasps" were destroyed by the Russian Aerospace Forces.

          By the way, what is the infamous "cube"? In Donbass there was a "beech" - the next generation, the heir of the "cube".
          Quote: gray smeet
          However, in war, commanders simply must foresee the worst case scenario. That is, in this case - that the “Square” captured in Deir Ez-Zor is serviceable and ready for battle.

          It is easy to find out: if the RTR detects the broadcasting of the 1C11 radar (or, even worse, 1C31), then the "square" will move to the list of top priority targets. If not, it will wait for its turn.
          Moreover, this air defense system is quite old, and even in export version.
        8. vova1973
          vova1973 24 January 2016 13: 05
          +2
          Under this, the captured air defense system will be put by the enemies of a workable complex of the same model, and then they will say that they shot down the planes from the captured complex and find the calculations. How many former military experts around the world are wobbling. The basis of the ISIL command staff is former Iraqi officers with combat experience.
        9. Belousov
          Belousov 25 January 2016 08: 47
          0
          In this case, they simply clean up the area of ​​the alleged dislocation of the complex using the lunar landscape design method.
        10. Belousov
          Belousov 25 January 2016 08: 47
          0
          In this case, they simply clean up the area of ​​the alleged dislocation of the complex using the lunar landscape design method.
      6. Maksus
        Maksus 22 January 2016 14: 14
        +7
        I wouldn’t have hit it yet, the missiles were designed to knock down maneuvering supersonic fighters, and not subsonic floppy buckets with a propeller.
      7. Kent0001
        Kent0001 22 January 2016 14: 14
        +4
        I agree, but this missile can shoot down faster targets .... and it will be!
      8. poacher
        poacher 22 January 2016 14: 26
        +3
        hi from the past, what have we preserved from the old one, to shoot down their raptors?
      9. Evpatiy.
        Evpatiy. 22 January 2016 14: 31
        +3
        I wanted to say the same thing! It’s too early to write off Soviet weapons!
      10. Ze Kot
        Ze Kot 22 January 2016 14: 44
        +7
        And what not to bring down that? Subsonic is NOT an inconspicuous target ...
      11. 11 black
        11 black 22 January 2016 14: 53
        +4
        Quote: sasha 19871987
        The genius of Soviet engineers inspires respect !!! the modern newfangled American colossus is shot down by a rocket of a complex of more than half a century of development ... glory to the Russian genius !!!


        Glory is glory - but for the sake of justice, the UAVs "Reaper" and "Predator" flying over Yemen are a very simple goal - it's like shooting down an attack aircraft from the Second World War - if the raptor was thrown or at least a penguin - then it's another matter, but the UAV .. ...
        Quote: poacher
        hi from the past, what have we preserved from the old one, to shoot down their raptors?

        Of course, you’re kidding raptors as a joke - I’d like to see how the C-75 raptor knocks down, but this is extremely unlikely
        1. Vladimir73
          Vladimir73 23 January 2016 08: 27
          +2
          Quote: 11 black
          I would like to see how the S-75 raptor knocks down, but this is extremely unlikely


          They do not let raptors go where they can shoot ... yes
      12. Suhow
        Suhow 23 January 2016 13: 54
        +1
        Soviet engineering school, Glory. But +
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 22 January 2016 12: 12
      12
      Quote: GRAY
      The Americans call it "failed landing" and "operator error".

      No matter how it is called, but the cadres are encouraging, the mattress killer is also there, and the more such cadres will be, the better for the world. good
    3. Finches
      Finches 22 January 2016 12: 35
      10
      Soviet rocket, and even assembled by Soviet workers - and in a million years, by smell, it will find and destroy the American warrior !!!
  2. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 22 January 2016 12: 08
    +6
    And the Americans will claim that it was an operator error or a technical malfunction. Well, for these reasons alone, UAVs lose.
    1. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 22 January 2016 12: 13
      +5
      ..... And the Americans will claim that it was an operator error or a technical malfunction. Well, solely for these reasons, UAVs lose ....

      .... Well, yes .... The chassis is not pulled ..... laughing
    2. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 22 January 2016 13: 20
      0
      The Americans can report that their drone has successfully rammed a ground target and completed the task.
  3. newcomer
    newcomer 22 January 2016 12: 08
    +7
    what a news! shame and ashes on the head of the Yankees. I want to thank and take off the hat in front of our designers.
    1. Dazdranagon
      Dazdranagon 22 January 2016 12: 20
      11
      Quote: newbie
      what a news! shame and ashes on the head of the Yankees. I want to thank and take off the hat in front of our designers.
      - you can shoot down a subsonic drone without Stealth technology even from 72-K of 1940 ...
      1. Dazdranagon
        Dazdranagon 22 January 2016 13: 17
        +1
        "Minus makers" refute me! Or weak? No one was embarrassed that the video shows the cuts - first in the afternoon, the missile is guided, in the evening it is launched, in the morning the wreckage ...
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 22 January 2016 13: 33
          +2
          Quote: Dazdranagon
          - first in the afternoon, launching a rocket, launch in the evening, wreckage in the morning ... Stop hacking, turn on your brains!

          But the video can not be attached neither to the area, nor to the time.
          And at night, "guidance" still cannot be removed, without special equipment.
  4. avg
    avg 22 January 2016 12: 08
    +4
    Soviet means excellent! good
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 22 January 2016 12: 08
    10
    Our old air defense system contributed to the just cause. Weapons in the USSR and in Russia are made in good faith with a large margin of safety and service.
  6. bronik
    bronik 22 January 2016 12: 09
    13
    The technique is old, and the goals are new. Nice ...
  7. Neko75
    Neko75 22 January 2016 12: 09
    +8
    This is what was recently written about here .... Otherwise, it’s not military losses ... they are slowly knocking it down. And what a pleasure the old Soviet weapons are working!
    1. Jack-b
      Jack-b 22 January 2016 12: 29
      +5
      Sorry for the offtop buddy, but your avatar is wrong. In the USSR, homosexuality was "not welcome". Otherwise, I agree.
      1. flay
        flay 22 January 2016 22: 12
        +1
        and indeed, among normal men soldier not ... NOT WELCOME!
        hi
      2. Angry orc
        Angry orc 22 January 2016 22: 44
        +1
        Well, we can assume that Germany is feminine, and the USSR is masculine
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. Dr. Barmaley
    Dr. Barmaley 22 January 2016 12: 10
    16
    American UAV shot down in Yemen by a Soviet missile


    "The accursed Stalin reached out!" (C)
    This Soviet technique has no reverence for democratic prodigies.
  9. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 22 January 2016 12: 12
    +6
    It is assumed that the device was destroyed on January 20 in the sky over the capital of Yemen - Sana'a. The video contains the moment of the launch of the missile by the Houthis from the S-75 "Dvina" anti-aircraft missile system


    What to say? Old it does not mean not effective, especially in skilled hands. The old horse will not spoil the furrow))).
  10. Taygerus
    Taygerus 22 January 2016 12: 12
    +3
    Yemenis landed an omega toy, weapons of the Soviet era are still in operation
  11. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 22 January 2016 12: 13
    +1
    the rocket was aimed at the target by shouting "alah akbar" (joke). this thing and stealth shoot down
  12. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 22 January 2016 12: 13
    0
    The UAV model is not clear.
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 22 January 2016 13: 16
      +5
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      The UAV model is not clear.

      Who cares? Just do not understand the cries and saliva of the patriots. In landfill conditions to bring down a slow-moving CC cause for puppy squeals?
  13. pts-m
    pts-m 22 January 2016 12: 13
    +8
    as they say ... the goal justifies the means of defeat ... Good luck to the people of Yemen in the fight against the clique of sau dith!
  14. Signal
    Signal 22 January 2016 12: 14
    +4
    Still working. Super.
  15. Hubun
    Hubun 22 January 2016 12: 15
    0
    Full international))))
  16. Andrea
    Andrea 22 January 2016 12: 16
    +1
    I don’t understand? Who let me in? Government troops? They got something wrong?
    If not, what happens, the opposition? The assembly does not understand whom.
    It is worth thinking. what Won't the complexes get along with the calculations, where not necessary?
    1. AlexTires
      AlexTires 22 January 2016 12: 24
      0
      Quote: Andrea
      Won't the complexes get along with the calculations, where not necessary?

      After the 25 summer sale of the Ukrainian industry, you can no longer think about it, but worry ...
    2. GRAY
      GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 26
      +2
      Quote: Andrea
      Won't the complexes get along with the calculations, where not necessary?

      They have already fallen where necessary. laughing
    3. Mera joota
      Mera joota 22 January 2016 13: 18
      +2
      Quote: Andrea
      Do not understand? Who let go? Government troops?

      The Hussites were letting in. This is not a half-wild gang, but part of the army, and therefore they know how to use it ...
      Quote: Andrea
      Won't the complexes get along with the calculations, where not necessary?

      I mean to Syria? Husites Shiites and IG are enemies for them. If you plan to go to the USA, then what will they see new?
    4. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 22 January 2016 16: 57
      0
      Quote: Andrea
      I don’t understand? Who let me in? Government troops? They got something wrong?

      That's right - the launch was carried out by the calculations of government troops. It’s just that each side of the war in Yemen has its own government. smile

      Seriously, most of the government army is fighting on the side of the Hussites. But since in the Western media this war is represented as a rebellion by a handful of extremists against the legitimately elected president, the army men were also recorded as Hussites.
      It cannot be said that the regular army is fighting on the side of the opponents of the democratically elected president - this does not fit into the official Western version of this war. But here's the trouble - the army has a lot of such weapons, which the rebels never had. From here there are mind-blowing messages like "rebels fired on ballistic missiles in saudi arabia"Or"SAM rebel shot down a drone". smile
      1. Pissarro
        Pissarro 23 January 2016 21: 28
        0
        especially delivering reports that five warships of Saudi Arabia were sunk by wild Hussite rebels, four of which in one month, October 2015, on the high seas. laughing
    5. Pissarro
      Pissarro 23 January 2016 21: 23
      0
      In Yemen, what kind of government troops? Half remained loyal to President Saleh and sculpted for the Hussites, half for the Saudi coalition, loyal to the new runaway and returning President Hadi .. There are a lot of Soviet weapons there, several f15 and f16 were shot down, and one of f16 was shot down from S-60, ordinary anti-aircraft guns, the Hussites have 120 of them left.This indicates not only the skill of the anti-aircraft gunners, but also the level of training of the Saudi pilots
  17. kursk87
    kursk87 22 January 2016 12: 17
    0
    That's what high-quality Soviet missiles mean, which, after many years, are capable of hitting modern targets
  18. PatriotKZ
    PatriotKZ 22 January 2016 12: 17
    +2
    USSR quality mark. hi
  19. Engineer
    Engineer 22 January 2016 12: 18
    +9
    And what's the problem of shooting down this slow-moving airplane with a propeller? At landfills, targets are harder to shoot down than this.
    1. AlexTires
      AlexTires 22 January 2016 12: 26
      +5
      That's it - the scout flies according to the given program, there are no warning systems for launching missiles, he does not do anti-aircraft maneuvers.
    2. GRAY
      GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 35
      +5
      Quote: Engineer
      And what's the problem of shooting down this slow-moving airplane with a propeller? At landfills, targets are harder to shoot down than this.

      I am surprised that there is still not a single comment on the topic "this is not true, it cannot be because the old rusty C-75 cannot shoot down a high-tech US UAV made entirely of shit sticks composite materials and possessing negligible ESR ".
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 22 January 2016 21: 57
        0
        Where is it high-tech?
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 22 January 2016 17: 01
      0
      Quote: Engineer
      And what's the problem of shooting down this slow-moving airplane with a propeller? At landfills, targets are harder to shoot down than this.

      EPR.
      S-75 is a rather old complex, designed for sheds of type B-52 or F-4. EMNIP, before him in the line of air defense systems was only S-25.
  20. jovanni
    jovanni 22 January 2016 12: 22
    +3
    So much for the "lag" of Soviet engineering! Traitors 25 years ago took our homeland away under the pretext of "lagging behind", and this "backward" weapon still works ...
  21. SAM 5
    SAM 5 22 January 2016 12: 23
    0
    The bird flew (Gray eagle-Gray eagle). 25th went, anniversary.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. Tra-ta-ta
    Tra-ta-ta 22 January 2016 12: 29
    +2
    The USA lost a total of 24 heavy UAVs ..
    MQ-9 Reaper = 16900000 USD x 24 = 405600000 ...
  24. iouris
    iouris 22 January 2016 12: 32
    0
    It may very well be, although unlikely. Most likely, the S-125 upgraded in Belarus was used.
  25. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 22 January 2016 12: 33
    +1
    There is nothing surprising here! Soviet missiles for more than a dozen years, you can shoot down anything.
  26. demo
    demo 22 January 2016 12: 35
    0
    The Washington Post recently reported that “in 2015, the United States lost a total of 24 heavy UAVs in Afghanistan, in the Horn of Africa, in Iraq in Libya, Kuwait, Turkey, Syria, and also, presumably, in Mali and Yemen.

    Those who are looking for are asked to return for a fee.
  27. demo
    demo 22 January 2016 12: 36
    +1
    And the rocket cheerfully flew so and knocked down the adversary.
    Despite the years.
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 22 January 2016 13: 19
      0
      Quote: demo
      And the rocket cheerfully flew so and knocked down the adversary.
      Despite the years.

      What terrible thing happened? The new UAV will be launched, business ...
  28. Old
    Old 22 January 2016 12: 37
    0
    A beautiful flash in the night sky!) This is really fantastic: how old is the technique, but it works! We knew how to do it before!
  29. tolyasik0577
    tolyasik0577 22 January 2016 12: 39
    +5
    And actually, what is the problem to shoot down a drone. I do not understand them, but I think he is not stealth, does not fly at supersonic speed. The main advantage of drones, in my opinion, is the relative cheapness and lack of a pilot inside. They must a priori be knocked down and fall. The fact that the Americans lose them only means that they use them intensively.
    Respect of the Chunga Chang that managed to cope with the SAM.
  30. epsilon571
    epsilon571 22 January 2016 12: 42
    +3
    Urgent news. In Syria, terrorists captured the air defense system
    "Square"
    The square was captured

    In the area of ​​the Deir-Ez-Zor airbase, militants of the "Islamic State" banned in the Russian Federation attacked the positions of a part of the Syrian air defense unit. In the hands of the terrorists, judging by the pictures they posted on the Web, there were at least one 2P25 combat vehicle, a self-propelled reconnaissance and guidance system (SURN 1S91) and several 3M9 anti-aircraft missiles - the main components of the Kvadrat mobile air defense system.
    It is difficult to judge the state of the weapon from the photo. Externally, no damage was done to vehicles or rockets. What is inside is not known. Perhaps the captured "Square" is serviceable and ready for battle.

    / Newspaper "UTRO" http://www.utro.ru/articles/2016/01/22/1268211.shtml /
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 22 January 2016 12: 57
      0
      "Square" Square was captured,
      and what, do they think on horseback? Specialists are needed for the complex, besides let them launch the radar, here they (bearded) will understand what it means when retribution comes from heaven.
    2. WUA 518
      WUA 518 22 January 2016 13: 05
      +1
      Quote: epsilon571
      Urgent news. In Syria, terrorists captured the air defense system
      "Square" Square was captured

      News from Twitter, not yet confirmed.
  31. pinhead
    pinhead 22 January 2016 12: 44
    0
    that's what school means ...
  32. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 22 January 2016 12: 48
    +8
    It turned out that the USSR defeated the Cold War. laughing

    But then a major betrayal occurred in the leadership of the USSR, and the victory was surrendered "for a jar of jam and a basket of cookies"bad boy. am
    1. tolyasik0577
      tolyasik0577 22 January 2016 13: 16
      +3
      For joy, such a bad guy bathed in jam, but he has not been able to completely wash himself to this day.
  33. kizhe
    kizhe 22 January 2016 12: 57
    +1
    Glory to Soviet missiles all over the world!
  34. Streich
    Streich 22 January 2016 13: 02
    0
    I just can’t understand, what is it that everyone is worn with these unmanned vehicles? The same pieces of iron as ordinary planes. As for stealth, this is generally complete nonsense. At the M200BR, who understands (this is the first radar on lamps) we saw the Shrike compartment and could accompany it. And for the 75 complex, this is not the trick.
    Another issue, in my opinion, UAVs are very interesting as a scout, as a strategist who has been bartering the sky for a long time. Well let's say a week. I understand that this is only possible with a nuclear power plant. Moreover, such an aircraft was tested, though with a crew, but irradiation. The topic was closed. In my opinion, it is time to return to this topic again.
  35. doework
    doework 22 January 2016 13: 03
    +4
    The "old lady" S-75 is still working .. I had the honor of serving in the technical division and serving her ..
    Although, IMHO, it would be better to land this UAV without the use of weapons, but with the help of the appropriate REO, and take it out for a detailed study.
  36. rov81
    rov81 22 January 2016 13: 08
    +3
    The old horse does not spoil the furrow)
  37. Nimijar
    Nimijar 22 January 2016 13: 27
    +1
    The Soviet Union will punish everyone!))))
    1. Gormenghast
      Gormenghast 22 January 2016 15: 13
      +2
      Dead hand of the USSR in action. laughing
  38. Kachesgm
    Kachesgm 22 January 2016 13: 52
    +3
    As I understand it, all these heavy UAVs are detected by any anti-aircraft radar, so it is not surprising that the S-75 calmly knocks it down. It affects only the operating periods laid down by the designers in Soviet weapons. And the manufacture of military equipment was at its best ...
  39. axay032
    axay032 22 January 2016 13: 54
    +1
    The video is certainly interesting, but you can glue anything. First day, then night start somewhere then again day. Torn plot. Well, of course, if everything is true.
  40. satelit24
    satelit24 22 January 2016 14: 21
    +2
    Honestly, drones are made for that, so as not to spare them! There are no losses in manpower - no one needs to pay, and the piece of iron is still stamped - thereby the country's economy is also supported recourse
  41. KOMA
    KOMA 22 January 2016 14: 26
    0
    Our smart and accurate rocket, hit any height!
  42. Bort radist
    Bort radist 22 January 2016 14: 59
    0
    There is life in the old dog yet!
    There are still berries in the buttocks!
    There is still power and not mowed
    Old fighter!
    There is still gunpowder - so shoot!
    There is still money - so take a walk!
    There are more songs - so let's finish them to the end!fellow
  43. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 22 January 2016 15: 13
    0
    We trust modern weapons, it is not clear to anyone, especially. How will the pilots feel now ??? and happiness that "Square" will be inoperative.
  44. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 23 January 2016 10: 41
    0
    The newspaper reminds that the “Dvina” C-75 air defense system was adopted in the USSR in 1957 year, was supplied to more than four dozen countries and in many of them it is still in service ”.
    Now imagine that with their well-heaped-up Fe-35 and the rest of the trash, our missiles and planes will make later years of construction. The great praiser of Mujamdar technique, or whatever his name is, is probably crying now and bites his elbows.
  45. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 23 January 2016 10: 46
    0
    Quote: russmensch
    Yes, their whole brood has already landed. The Amer general complained that they suddenly flew to Russia on their own, as ours changed their program in flight.

    It all started with Depardieu. All rule us.
    1. Zefr
      Zefr 23 January 2016 16: 39
      +1
      Depardieu dumped. I sold all the donated apartments and left.
      1. Mih
        Mih 25 January 2016 00: 00
        0
        Depardieu dumped. belay
        Horrible! yes Well, he cares love
  46. Voyager
    Voyager 23 January 2016 13: 04
    +2
    Quote: oldseaman1957
    American UAV shot down in Yemen by a Soviet missile!
    “So tremble the Yankees!” RUSSIAN modern rockets cooler!

    Enough is enough. We had so much noise about calibers. Everything is great, but they have no special advantages in terms of technical characteristics over their Western counterparts, and their arsenal is much richer.
    1. KCA
      KCA 23 January 2016 20: 38
      0
      Here are just the western counterparts on cruisers and destroyers, I haven’t heard something about such ships as RK and MRK with "Tomahawks", and a flock of RTOs with a speed of under, or even for 40 knots is a very unpleasant enemy even for AUG, they will dive with a range (official, not the fact that the maximum) 300 km, and in the case of real hostilities with what number of RTOs lost can be compared to the sunken "Cole" or even an aircraft carrier?
  47. duchy
    duchy 23 January 2016 13: 43
    0
    It is interesting of course, but who will provide a link to the video. On YouTube it was deleted by the "exclusive nation" !!
  48. partizan86
    partizan86 23 January 2016 15: 20
    0
    It can be shot down with an anti-aircraft machine gun, unless of course it initially flies after the shooter.
    1. KCA
      KCA 23 January 2016 20: 40
      0
      On T24 they told and showed "Armor", so something is not very good they shot down an unmanned target from guns with a rate of fire of 4000 rounds per minute, they had to get missiles
      1. PVOSV
        PVOSV 24 January 2016 09: 50
        0
        fired at the E-95 target, fuselage length 2.2 m, wingspan 2.4 m. Such a midge is difficult to hit with a cannon canal.
  49. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 23 January 2016 18: 47
    0
    Who said that in Russia they can’t do good things !?
  50. Jan2016
    Jan2016 23 January 2016 19: 55
    0
    s-75 shot down a traitor? Is it the same with invisibility technology? Or is it another?