Military Review

Tehran is interested in the mobile complex "Bastion"

74
Iranian representatives expressed interest in the Russian coastal missile system "Bastion" with the supersonic Yakhont missile, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to Interfax.


Tehran is interested in the mobile complex "Bastion"


“The interest of Iranian partners in this complex is due to the high tactical and technical characteristics of the Bastion, its reputation in the global arms market. And the most important thing is that Iran has a long coastline and sea areas requiring cover, ”a MTC source told Interfax.

He noted that “after the lifting of international sanctions against the Islamic republic, military-technical cooperation between Moscow and Tehran appeared new perspectives and for the supply of the Russian Bastion complex nothing hinders Iran.”

It is noted that the complex "Bastion" "is able to protect the coast with a length of over 600 kilometers, while being in 200 kilometers from the coastline."

Reference "RG": "The" standard "battery consists of four self-propelled launchers, one or two command and control vehicles, a combat duty support vehicle, and four transport-loading vehicles. Additionally, the complex can be equipped with Monolith-B mobile radar or airborne radar. The deployment time from the marching to the combat position does not exceed five minutes, and the interval between missile launches is only from two to five seconds. ”

Photos used:
http://aeroplan2010.mirtesen.ru/
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Neko75
    Neko75 22 January 2016 11: 39 New
    33
    It would be nice. Iranians would block the entire Persian Gulf.
    1. alex-s
      alex-s 22 January 2016 11: 41 New
      16
      It would be nice.

      Only need to be prohibited to put them on the Caspian!
      1. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 22 January 2016 11: 57 New
        +8
        Russian weapons, as a guarantor of American aggression, sounds gorgeous) given the activity of American mongrel in this region, Iran has a well-founded interest in this guarantor)))
      2. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 22 January 2016 11: 58 New
        -8
        Quote: alex-s
        Only need to be prohibited to put them on the Caspian!
        - Right! Let them put them on the Arctic!
      3. tomcat117
        tomcat117 22 January 2016 14: 57 New
        +3
        What a foolish thing to ban Iran from putting them in the Caspian.
        They even arrested the "lost" American Ossians, and the political conjuncture and alliances, as you know, change from the alignment of forces and the preference for benefits.
        There is no need to go far for an example, starting with all sorts of dads, Turkmenbash and ending with brothers, everyone swears in friendship ... for the time being. (None of them recognized either Abkhazia, Ossetia, or Crimea, they mutter something incomprehensible in nose).
        1. Talgat
          Talgat 22 January 2016 19: 48 New
          +5
          as always I repeat: Iran closes the Caspian Sea (and therefore the Russian Federation and us) by itself from potential aggressors

          Iran is now the target number 1 and the enemy for the aggressor, because the "passage" to the Caspian Sea to the center of Eurasia

          Therefore, Syria. Therefore, Iran will not be left alone. Therefore, it is necessary to supply Iran with the most modern weapons. Trade with him - strengthening him. What Kazakhstan and Russia do
          And Iran understands this, so it has long taken a course towards maximum rapprochement with Russia and the CSTO

          And in the worst case scenario, send CSTO troops and fight on its territory (if it does not cope). It is not in vain that Iran does not terminate and holds an agreement on the deployment of Russian troops to the reserve.

          And Onyx is just what you need - only the threat of their appearance in the Gulf is already a huge trump card for Russia and Iran - so we must not rush to put it - but make the most of the trump card. And then put it under the necessary "pretext"

          In 300 Bay conditions, kilometer RCC becomes a strategic factor
    2. avg
      avg 22 January 2016 11: 48 New
      +1
      Yes, if you still disperse, equip and disguise sensibly positional areas, then the mattresses will howl.
      1. gergi
        gergi 22 January 2016 12: 08 New
        10
        No need to disguise. Only time to waste, the mobile bastion, arrived, fucked and dumped at a pace. That's good.
        1. Ze Kot
          Ze Kot 22 January 2016 14: 39 New
          0
          Now drones are working online.
        2. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 22 January 2016 18: 33 New
          +2
          Not only is it necessary to disguise, but also to get a few dozen inflatable divisions! Let the enemy try to figure out which direction the luli will grab!
      2. Pajamas
        Pajamas 22 January 2016 16: 32 New
        -2
        Quote: avg
        Marshal
        avg (2) RU Today, 11:48 ↑ New

        Yes, if you still disperse, equip and disguise sensibly positional areas, then the mattresses will howl.


        Unfortunately they won’t howl -Surface Ship Vertical Launched Tomahawk Land Attack Missile is the RGM / UGM-109E is quite a tool to deal with the Bastion.
        1. shans2
          shans2 22 January 2016 17: 35 New
          +2
          they will move under the cover of armor ....
          1. Pajamas
            Pajamas 22 January 2016 21: 20 New
            0
            Quote: shans2
            Did you write for "trolling" or don't "know" why?
            We read my friend.
            RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk


            My friend, and you always focus only on the first article found in Google? If you are proficient in the topic, you can share knowledge of what will prevent the United States from working out the Kyrgyz Republic on the Bastions.
          2. Pajamas
            Pajamas 23 January 2016 01: 12 New
            0
            In St. Petersburg, the report "Actual problems of protection and safety" was read in the report "Assessment of the characteristics of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system" ..... At the same time, the report notes the following shortcomings of the complex, identified as a result of real shooting at the range:
            1) Poor air defense missile defense capabilities are shown for firing targets maneuvering and flying with a heading parameter of more than 2-3 km;
            2) The possibility of firing at targets flying at speeds of more than 400 m / s has not been confirmed, although a speed of 1000 m / s is given in the performance characteristics of the complex;
            3) The maximum firing range of 20 km is provided for aerial targets flying at a speed of no more than 80 m / s (on the E-95 target), since the available overloads of missiles at this range do not exceed 5 units.
            4) The main disadvantage of a bicaliber missile (model not specified) is the lack of an engine in the march stage of the missile launcher, as a result of which within the declared damage range the missile will move with negative acceleration of the order of 50-30 m / sq. Sec, which leads to the appearance of such non-linearities in the input signal of the missile control loop, which lead to an increase in errors of its guidance on the actively maneuvering target.
            5) The capabilities of the complex to defeat tactical ballistic missiles, OTP, as well as their warheads when using a hypersonic missile with a warhead weighing 4 kg have not been confirmed.
            6) The presence of only two guidance methods for SAM (the model is not specified) - the three-point method and the half-straightening method - which limits the capabilities of the air defense system to defeat various types of air-defense systems in difficult conditions (maneuver, interference, NLC, a hovering helicopter, UAV, etc. .d.).
            7) The control system for the detonation of the warhead of a hypersonic missile, operating on a signal from the anti-aircraft missile system in accordance with the established distance difference between the target and the missile, can only be effective when aiming the missile defense system (model not indicated) by the method of full straightening, and when aiming the missile defense system using the "three-point method "and half straightening is triggered only when the target moves directly to the firing ZPRK combat vehicle.
            8) In the aforementioned last case, the effectiveness of hitting a target may turn out to be low due to the phenomenon of rebounding of the striking elements of the combat chat, since in this case their vector of their speed will be directed at a small angle to the surface of the target.
            9) The effective coordination of missile defense missile equipment (the area of ​​operation of the non-contact target sensor, the NDC and the strike area of ​​the striking elements of the warheads), as well as the prevention of the operation of the NDC of the SAMs (model not specified) from the underlying surface when firing at the NLC, is not ensured.
            10) The influence of meteorological conditions (rain, fog, hydrometeors) on a decrease in the target detection range for the developed radar SCR of the millimeter wave range is 10-50 times stronger than for the version of the ZPRK with a radar of the centimeter wave range, and this disadvantage cannot be compensated for by the presence in the ZPRK "Patsir-S1" optoelectronic channel for tracking the VC, due to the strong dependence of the quality of the latter on weather conditions.
        2. quote
          quote 22 January 2016 19: 16 New
          +2
          Quote: Pajama
          Quote: avg
          Marshal
          avg (2) RU Today, 11:48 ↑ New

          Yes, if you still disperse, equip and disguise sensibly positional areas, then the mattresses will howl.


          Unfortunately they won’t howl -Surface Ship Vertical Launched Tomahawk Land Attack Missile is the RGM / UGM-109E is quite a tool to deal with the Bastion.


          Did you write for "trolling" or don't "know" why?
          We read my friend.
          RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk

          Modification of the missile, designed to make it more suitable for tactical support of troops, that is, use in the immediate vicinity of the front line. During the program, measures were taken to reduce the cost of the rocket in comparison with previous samples, through the use of lighter materials and a cheaper Williams F415-WR-400/402 engine. The UHF satellite communications system makes it possible to redirect a missile in flight to any of the 15 pre-programmed targets. A TV camera installed on board allows you to assess the state of the target when a rocket approaches it, and make a decision on whether to continue the attack or re-target the rocket to another.

          Due to the lightweight design, the rocket is no longer suitable for launching from torpedo tubes. However, submarines equipped with the Mk-41 VPU can still use this missile.

          Currently, the rocket is the main modification used by the US Navy. On November 5, 2013, the Reiteon company of the US Navy delivered a three thousandth CR of this modification [16] since 2004 [17].
          RGM / UGM-109E TLAM-E (Tomahawk Block IV)

          A modification of the Tactical Tomahawk currently under development, with advanced tactical capabilities and the ability to hit moving targets (including surface ships).

          Well, how will he deal with Bastion? Do not confuse the possibility of application, and the real opportunities and tasks!
          Two! EGE Well!
    3. sever.56
      sever.56 22 January 2016 11: 49 New
      10
      Quote: Neko75
      Iranians would block the entire Persian Gulf.


      Most importantly, they can block the Strait of Hormuz, through which Saudi Arabia and Qatar drive oil around the world. Here are the "joys" for the Americans with the Saudis and Qataris ...
    4. vlad66
      vlad66 22 January 2016 11: 51 New
      17
      Quote: Neko75
      It would be nice. Iranians would block the entire Persian Gulf.

      And even better, if our coast was covered up, we would have a larger Persian Gulf coast. To this day, as part of the Russian Armed Forces, we have: In the North-1 complex \ 4 launchers. On the Black Sea-3 complex \ 12 launchers. In the Pacific Ocean- 1 complex \ 4 PU. It will be a little. hi
      1. Maksus
        Maksus 22 January 2016 11: 56 New
        +1
        I agree, but it is not reasonable to supply such complexes for export, especially to the Islamic state. Who knows that Ayatollahs will wander into the head.
        But the joy in the comments ... For some reason, no one is afraid that our Mediterranean squadron can also become a target.
        1. oldseaman1957
          oldseaman1957 22 January 2016 12: 12 New
          12
          Quote: Maksus
          Who knows that Ayatollahs will wander into the head.
          - "Bastion" - DEFENSIVE complex. And whatever the "Ayatollahs" come to mind, he will not shoot further than his declared 300 km. But the "Ayatollahs" will pay real bucks for "Bastions", which is very gut.
          1. DobryAAH
            DobryAAH 22 January 2016 12: 21 New
            +3
            Instability in the Persian Gulf area means high oil prices. Cracks will again breathe freely, buying an iPhone that has fallen in value in rubles.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Maksus
            Maksus 22 January 2016 12: 32 New
            0
            Normal statement - what's the difference how to shoot a ship? Defending against his actions or attack him BEFORE the action begins. The only defensive weapon in the world is a mine, everything else - as you want, so use it. And what do we get from these bucks for several complexes? This will not fix the situation in the economy, the Chinese will see what is inside. The plant is a big plus only.
            1. sharp-lad
              sharp-lad 22 January 2016 18: 38 New
              0
              You can also slip a mine under your feet! lol So, in principle, there are no defensive weapons.
              1. Maksus
                Maksus 22 January 2016 20: 14 New
                0
                In this case, it will be more like a sophisticated version of suicide))))
          4. KVIRTU
            KVIRTU 22 January 2016 13: 12 New
            0
            It’ll even shoot.
            300 km is a flight along a combined trajectory (reduction to min. Altitude when approaching the target for air defense breakthrough), at medium altitudes it will fly off by 500 km.
        2. GRAY
          GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 23 New
          +1
          Quote: Maksus
          . For some reason, no one is afraid that our Mediterranean squadron may also become a target.

          My neighbor has a gun, but I don’t think that I will become his target.
          There is one question that gives answers to a lot. In the French interpretation, it sounds like this: "- Nahua?".
          1. Maksus
            Maksus 22 January 2016 12: 34 New
            -4
            Are not afraid? I envy. Try to flood his apartment, and then send a drunken nahua, then maybe you can worry)))
            But seriously, Ukrainians and Ukrainians were not taken seriously either, they were so saturated with weapons since the times of the USSR that some people can’t calm down for 2 already, others shot down our Tu-22.
            1. GRAY
              GRAY 22 January 2016 12: 40 New
              +2
              Quote: Maksus
              Are not afraid? I envy. Try to flood his apartment, and then send a drunken nahua, then maybe you can worry)))

              Well, the customs there you have. Does everyone do this to you? Where do you live? How many murders in your house take place a year?
              1. Maksus
                Maksus 22 January 2016 13: 02 New
                0
                This is not with us, it is everywhere. Here we have it. Or are you not living in Russia? have you ever heard how they break their heads behind a scratched car, or how do they drag a man about a kick in the yard of an 50 yard?
            2. max702
              max702 22 January 2016 13: 08 New
              +7
              Quote: Maksus
              Are not afraid? I envy. Try to flood his apartment, and then send a drunken nahua, then maybe you can worry)))

              And why should I stoke his apartment? And if I messed up then how an adequate person will pay his losses. Won't you do that? If we let the connection be, and you flooded me, and I presented you with a claim for which you would send me to .. Then do not exact ..
              Quote: Maksus
              But seriously, Ukrainians and Ukrainians were not taken seriously either, they were so saturated with weapons since the times of the USSR that some people can’t calm down for 2 already, others shot down our Tu-22.

              And on this occasion, I will say this, then I understood that these "brotherly" peoples would have to beat the tinsel back in 1991 .. Seeing their actions and hearing their rhetoric, I perfectly understood the world will not end .. They got too hungry and lost the shores .. And so it happened , the rodents have gotten theirs, the Euragabon has everything ahead of us .. There is no doubt that we will have to fight, alas, but the fact is, it will not end like this until the BIG Krovushka returns the brain to its place, all this is useless.
        3. avdkrd
          avdkrd 22 January 2016 12: 34 New
          +5
          Quote: Maksus
          I agree, but it is not reasonable to supply such complexes for export, especially to the Islamic state. Who knows that Ayatollahs will wander into the head.
          But the joy in the comments ... For some reason, no one is afraid that our Mediterranean squadron can also become a target.

          Iran is not so much "Islamist" as an Islamic state. Iran is not engaged in the export of Islam, the meaning is an Islamist synonym for extremism, and this is closer to the Saudis and Qatar. The same Emirates are much closer to the Islamists, although they have a fairly balanced foreign policy, but we sell weapons to them. Iran is on the same side with Russia. All the fuss around his nuclear program is just an excuse to curb the growth of his influence and economy in a region vital for the Americans. No one announces sanctions on Israel, Pakistan and India, although Israel practically threatens to use its nuclear weapons on Iran, and Pakistan is still a powder keg.
          1. Maksus
            Maksus 22 January 2016 13: 00 New
            -1
            So, sanctions have been imposed on it because Iran is the only Shiite state. And the main ally of the USA is the Saudis, which are Sunnis. Everything is simple here.
        4. sharp-lad
          sharp-lad 22 January 2016 18: 36 New
          0
          The bugs will save how the French themselves turned off the French high-tech weapons in Iraq.
      2. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 22 January 2016 12: 05 New
        +4
        Quote: vlad66
        And even better if our coast was covered
        - Yes, enough to deal with projections. Iran acts on the basis of its own interests. And our interests to them insofar as, i.e. - do not care.
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 22 January 2016 12: 12 New
          +5
          Quote: vlad66
          Better yet, if our coast was covered up, we would have a larger Persian Gulf coast.
          This year they promise to give the country 5 complexes. Well, not so bad. Yes, and why not cover the entire coast. Only airborne hazard and nodal points.
        2. bannik
          bannik 22 January 2016 13: 42 New
          +3
          We also need to proceed from our interests: we will not sell - we will buy from others and put where we want. The presence of a contract for the supply and support, whatever one may say, stipulates certain conditions.
      3. max702
        max702 22 January 2016 12: 57 New
        +1
        Quote: vlad66
        And even better, if our coast was covered up, we would have a larger Persian Gulf coast. To this day, as part of the Russian Armed Forces, we have: In the North-1 complex \ 4 launchers. On the Black Sea-3 complex \ 12 launchers. In the Pacific Ocean- 1 complex \ 4 PU. It will be a little.

        The fact is that these complexes are, let's say, an analogue of the Strategic Missile Forces, I will explain why. If we have to use these complexes, it means THIRD WORLD! Yes Yes exactly! What threats does this complex neutralize? mainly work on enemy landing craft or large ongo ships .. And who has these classes of ships? That's right, NATO and its comrades .. anyone seriously expects Bole less successfully to fight NATO without the use of Strategic Missile Forces? By and large, these are weapons of the last stage of the defense of our coast .. And perhaps there is an obvious need for them in the Black Sea, there is a headless Turkey, in the Baltic no one will climb to us, in the North, especially, in the Pacific Japan, but again the probability of war it is not great, and since it will have to do with it only by bastions, everything and everyone will be used there, and above all nuclear weapons, the Yap's fleet is too strong and the striped ally is nearby, so if it starts there, then "The whole world is in dust ! "(c) .. With China in the same area? An absolutely incredible scenario, they are not at all able to fight with us from us and they get everything so well without war, they now have other problems and they perfectly understand the threat from Russia now, and in case of a conflict, China will be devoured from the other side .. that these complexes should be sold to Iran and it is desirable to force him to use them for us it is extremely profitable, the oil industry takes off, Iran's needs for weapons will grow progressively, if the sanctions are not included, everything that they sell for oil will go to buy it from us .. And they will include sanctions we’ll beat back on oil, but the same Iranian across the Caspian .. And with whom with whom, and with us, Iran is not at all able to fight with it for at least another 10-20 years. So you need to sell, the only question is how much will the production pull?
      4. Alex777
        Alex777 22 January 2016 16: 42 New
        +1
        They will earn money - they will put more with us.
    5. Monge
      Monge 22 January 2016 12: 59 New
      +2
      Iranians would block the entire Persian Gulf
      The main thing is that they do not change their priorities over time, they can deploy them in the Caspian.
    6. sanches-nk
      sanches-nk 23 January 2016 06: 34 New
      0
      Americans will wear blue diarrhea, but they will try to do everything so that we do not put "Bastions" there. They will negotiate, ask, demand, etc. In fact, these systems are a very serious trump card.
  2. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 22 January 2016 11: 39 New
    +6
    The Persians rushed to absorb the money. More than fifty yards of greenery removed from sanctions, just the same hand burn smile Come on, comrades, Iranians, invest in the Russian military-industrial complex - we still have a lot of interesting things. Prices are lower than market prices, and western prices, for sure.
    1. gergi
      gergi 22 January 2016 12: 11 New
      +3
      It is frightening to live without gut when the peaceful American humanitarians hang around.
  3. Hubun
    Hubun 22 January 2016 11: 39 New
    +7
    I would not be interested. Power !!!!. Once again, proud of Russian weapons
    1. kodxnumx
      kodxnumx 22 January 2016 12: 08 New
      +1
      In fact, if Iran buys a bastion, the shores will be covered very reliably, NATO and the United States are not suicidal flattery to where they do not shine not what they are unlikely to become!
  4. A-Sim
    A-Sim 22 January 2016 11: 41 New
    +1
    How the wheels raked violence .... Shine!
    1. mart-kot
      mart-kot 22 January 2016 13: 12 New
      +1
      filled up
    2. mart-kot
      mart-kot 22 January 2016 13: 12 New
      0
      filled up
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 January 2016 11: 44 New
    +8
    Such a complex in Iran is a guaranteed blocked not only the Strait of Hormuz, but also the Persian Gulf. For a greater extent. And in combination with the complex C 300 - it will become uncomfortable with any IUD, even striatum.
  6. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 22 January 2016 11: 44 New
    +1
    Even now they do not hesitate to infringe on the American Navy, and they will frolic with the Bastion! Only welcome, let them take on credit!
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 22 January 2016 12: 22 New
      +3
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      Even now they do not hesitate to infringe on the American Navy, and they will frolic with the Bastion! Only welcome, let them take on credit!

      They will now have enough money without a loan.
      Let them pay - they need the money themselves, to produce such complexes for themselves. We have few of them now ...
      To this day, as part of the RF Armed Forces, we have: In the North-1 complex \ 4 launchers. On the Black Sea-3 complex \ 12 launchers. In the Pacific Ocean-1 complex \ 4 launchers ...
  7. chikenous59
    chikenous59 22 January 2016 11: 45 New
    0
    Bastion means all the "generals" are ready to sell, but when an article comes out about the SU-35, which is going to be sold to China, such a buzz rises. It's strange somehow.
    Iranians will not work on the study of this complex in order to obtain an analogue? Or the Chinese can not sell any secrets?
    1. Andy
      Andy 22 January 2016 11: 55 New
      0
      they theoretically can, and the Chinese do it in practice. it is a pity that with his field marshal epaulettes it is not able to understand. You can also include a clause on non-resale in the contract. But the Chinese sneezed on all the contracts.
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 22 January 2016 11: 59 New
        10
        Quote: Andy
        they theoretically can, and the Chinese do it practically.

        Do not even underestimate Iran, the Persians are no more stupid than the Chinese and also on your mind. hi
    2. gergi
      gergi 22 January 2016 12: 14 New
      +1
      An analog? This, my friend, do not copy the sledgehammer! Merikos tried to copy the S-300 and nothing came of it, the exceptional ones broke off.
  8. Magic archer
    Magic archer 22 January 2016 11: 45 New
    +3
    I can imagine how the Americans will howl!)))) They were against C 300, and then there’s PCR to the heap! Again, threats of sanctions and other nonsense will begin
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 22 January 2016 11: 56 New
      +3
      The Americans will really "howl", but such a howl is pleasant for us. They are again going to impose new sanctions with the British. If we still cannot answer with adequate sanctions, then at least create a problem for the Americans in this matter.
    2. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 22 January 2016 12: 06 New
      +1
      To save face, they may not even notice this contract. After all, the letter of the law is observed, Iran is a peaceful country and you can sell any weapon (even a "death star") except nuclear weapons. It's surprising to me something else. The Iranians have their own missile program and they are very proud of their PKR . A bunch of photos from parades, videos from exercises ... but they became interested in our "Bastions". Iranian weapons are coming out, which is good, but not very good. request )))
    3. tol100v
      tol100v 22 January 2016 12: 13 New
      +1
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Again threats of sanctions and other nonsense will begin

      Delirium and sanctions against Russia are insolently Saxons inventing from scratch! So it would be better to put on the "Bastions" and the S-300 than to wait for sanctions from the void!
  9. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 22 January 2016 11: 47 New
    +2
    It would be necessary to put, for nefig amers in a strange basin to rinse their tricks
  10. Neko75
    Neko75 22 January 2016 11: 48 New
    +5
    Like it or not, but in addition to Syria and Iran, we have no allies in the Middle East. And all that benefits the allies is to the detriment of the enemy.
    1. An64
      An64 22 January 2016 12: 02 New
      +1
      we have no allies in the Middle East


      Allies? I would not speak so categorically. Partners at a certain stage - yes, no more. As an example - yesterday Iran did not allow our "Knights" to fly to Qatar ...
      1. Talgat
        Talgat 22 January 2016 20: 00 New
        0
        Because Qatar is probably "kaka" and if Russia does not always understand. then the Iranians understand everything clearly

        Secondly, it’s hard to believe - Iran allows Russian combat aircraft to fly through itself for bombing, over its territory to carry out launches of CD. overflights of the KR over itself (what if it falls? not everyone will allow this at all), that is, in fact, Russia disposes of the airspace of Iran as its own - and suddenly does not allow the flight of "Knights"?
    2. gergi
      gergi 22 January 2016 12: 18 New
      +1
      But why are you not Syria and Iran allies? How many times have they betrayed us? Where did you make it? Unlike other multi-colored bros.
  11. gg.na
    gg.na 22 January 2016 11: 53 New
    +2
    Ha! Still to such a toy good not show interest wink !!! A very beautiful thing, so interest is normal! bully
  12. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 22 January 2016 11: 54 New
    +2
    On shots, it takes off and flies beautifully. Impressive!
  13. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 22 January 2016 12: 03 New
    0
    Can we? Help!
  14. triglav
    triglav 22 January 2016 12: 03 New
    -1
    Good machine! Let the Americans be licked again.
  15. skrabplus.ru
    skrabplus.ru 22 January 2016 12: 05 New
    +2
    The Iranians have never been friends with us, but in today's geopolitical situation, the rhetorical weapons must be sold to Iran, but for gold, all the same allies are against the igil. We will not sell - the Yankees ilm rice-eaters will boil their shit. + More on yachts!
  16. pts-m
    pts-m 22 January 2016 12: 08 New
    0
    Well, of course, you need to disguise the car body. For example, put an inscription on the sides - milk ---, that is, a milk carrier.
  17. Sobol
    Sobol 22 January 2016 12: 10 New
    0
    The machine is good, no doubt about it. Only, here, a friend from Iran is unclear. And you need to strengthen it very carefully. Friend today, tomorrow? Vaughn, this "friend" did not miss the Knight in Bahrain at the air show.
  18. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 22 January 2016 12: 12 New
    0
    This is all good, but what will they bomb the Saudis for killing the preacher? Good aviation is needed, but not on credit. We load our aircraft plants with orders under the cover.
    And boats with Caliber, but not to the Caspian Sea. Let them make a rustle to Africa.
  19. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 22 January 2016 12: 22 New
    0
    I have long expected this, for Iran this complex is vital.
  20. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 22 January 2016 12: 37 New
    0
    Quote: oldseaman1957
    Quote: Maksus
    Who knows that Ayatollahs will wander into the head.
    - "Bastion" - DEFENSIVE complex. And whatever the "Ayatollahs" come to mind, he will not shoot further than his declared 300 km. But the "Ayatollahs" will pay real bucks for "Bastions", which is very gut.

    And maybe not in dollars ..... why support the economy of a "partner".
  21. Megavolt
    Megavolt 22 January 2016 12: 40 New
    0
    Well ... "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." At least for now. Why not sell. After all, they do not ask for free. And there, you see, they will be interested in something else. So much for the established sales market for Russian weapons in the export version.
  22. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 22 January 2016 12: 42 New
    0
    Iran needs a lot more to arm itself, this is a great start.
  23. sa-ag
    sa-ag 22 January 2016 13: 05 New
    0
    The Sultanate of Oman, in anticipation of how his role will grow in the event of the Iranian threat, will come to him an oil and gas pipe from the north :-)
  24. Pete mitchell
    Pete mitchell 22 January 2016 13: 23 New
    +7
    Full speed ahead, it’s such a splinter in ..., and the Iranians will find how to apply it.
  25. urik62
    urik62 22 January 2016 14: 35 New
    0
    Quote: GRAY
    Quote: Maksus
    . For some reason, no one is afraid that our Mediterranean squadron may also become a target.

    My neighbor has a gun, but I don’t think that I will become his target.
    There is one question that gives answers to a lot. In the French interpretation, it sounds like this: "- Nahua?".

    I wouldn’t be so sure in your place, however it can happen
  26. PValery53
    PValery53 22 January 2016 18: 49 New
    0
    Of course, "Bastion" should be where it should be, in Iran. But to the NORTH, his path should be prohibited, by definition. When directed to the NORTH, he should fly to TEHERAN.
  27. flay
    flay 22 January 2016 21: 39 New
    0
    Quote: Maksus
    I agree, but it is not reasonable to supply such complexes for export, especially to the Islamic state. Who knows that Ayatollahs will wander into the head.
    But the joy in the comments ... For some reason, no one is afraid that our Mediterranean squadron can also become a target.

    Strongly agree and support! yes
    Today there is an ayatollah, but tomorrow God forbid, or rather Allah, who will be ?!
    Still some DAISH, under the slogan of GIVE the water area .... and who will these Bastoins go to?
    No, gentlemen - comrades .... do it LOW
  28. sanches-nk
    sanches-nk 23 January 2016 06: 34 New
    0
    It seems to me that the Americans will wear blue diarrhea, but they will try to do everything so that we do not put Bastions there. They will negotiate, ask, demand, etc. In fact, these systems are a very serious trump card.